<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Biometrical Journal via MedWorm.com</title>
        <description>MedWorm.com provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest items from the 'Biometrical Journal' source.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=Biometrical+Journal&t=Biometrical+Journal&s=Search&f=source]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:10:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5569048&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201290002</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5569048</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5569048</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Masthead: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5569047&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201290001</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5569047</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5569047</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5569046&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201290000</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5569046</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5569046</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A length‐based hierarchical model of brown trout (Salmo trutta fario) growth and production</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542330&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100083</link>
            <description>We present a hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) to estimate the growth parameters, production, and production over biomass ratio (P/B) of resident brown trout (Salmo trutta fario) populations. The data which are required to run the model are removal sampling and air temperature data which are conveniently gathered by freshwater biologists. The model is the combination of eight submodels: abundance, weight, biomass, growth, growth rate, time of emergence, water temperature, and production. Abundance is modeled as a mixture of Gaussian cohorts; cohorts centers and standard deviations are related by a von Bertalanffy growth function; time of emergence and growth rate are functions of water temperature; water temperature is predicted from air temperature; biomass, production, and P/B are subseq...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542330</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542330</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A minimum version of log‐rank test for testing the existence of cancer cure using relative survival data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542329&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100069</link>
            <description>AbstractCancer survival is one of the most important measures to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment and early diagnosis. The ultimate goal of cancer research and patient care is the cure of cancer. As cancer treatments progress, cure becomes a reality for many cancers if patients are diagnosed early and get effective treatment. If a cure does exist for a certain type of cancer, it is useful to estimate the time of cure. For cancers that impose excess risk of mortality, it is informative to understand the difference in survival between cancer patients and the general cancer‐free population. In population‐based cancer survival studies, relative survival is the standard measure of excess mortality due to cancer. Cure is achieved when the survival of cancer patients is equivalent to t...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542329</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542329</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Local wavelet‐vaguelette‐based functional classification of gene expression data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542328&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000135</link>
            <description>AbstractThis paper focuses on the problem of functional statistical classification of gene expression curves. A local‐wavelet‐vaguelette‐based functional logistic regression approach is presented. This approach is specially suitable for the classification of non‐stationary singular (non‐differentiable) curves. The performance of the methodology proposed is illustrated by implementing it for the classification of yeast cell‐cycle temporal gene expression profiles. A simulation study is also carried out for comparison with other functional classification methodologies. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542328</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542328</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A new proposal for a principal component‐based test for high‐dimensional data applied to the analysis of PhyloChip data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5501251&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000164</link>
            <description>AbstractA modification of the principal component test is presented. It uses a weighted combination of the sums of squares for different principal components and is thus more powerful in high‐dimensional settings with small sample sizes. Under usual normality assumptions, a rotation test is proposed which enables an exact conditional parametric test. The procedure is demonstrated with microarray data for the bacterial composition in the rhizosphere of different potato cultivars. In simulation studies, the power of the proposed statistic is compared with the competing multivariate parametric tests. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5501251</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5501251</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nonparametric estimation for cumulative duration of adverse events</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5501250&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000256</link>
            <description>AbstractAnalysis of adverse events (AE) for drug safety assessment presents challenges to statisticians in observational studies as well as in clinical trials since AEs are typically recurrent with varying duration and severity. Routine analyses often concentrate on the number of patients who had at least one occurrence of a specific AE or a group of AEs, or the time to occurrence of the first event. We argue that other information in AE data particularly cumulative duration of events is also important, particularly for benefit‐risk assessment. We propose a nonparametric method to estimate the mean cumulative duration (MCD) based on the nonparametric cumulative mean function estimate, together with a robust estimate for the variance of the estimate, as in Lawless and Nadeau (1995). This ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5501250</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5501250</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A stochastic model for survival of early prostate cancer with adjustments for leadtime, length bias, and over‐detection</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542327&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000107</link>
            <description>AbstractTo compare the survival between screen‐detected and clinically detected cancers, we applied a series of non‐homogeneous stochastic processes to deal with leadtime, length bias, and over‐detection by using full information on detection modes obtained from the Finnish randomized controlled trial for prostate cancer screening. The results show after 9‐year follow‐up the hazard ratio of prostate cancer death for screen‐detected cases against clinically detected cases increased from 0.24 (95% CI: 0.16–0.35) without correction for these biases, to 0.76 after correction for leadtime and length biases, and finally to 1.03 (95% CI: 0.79–1.33) for a further adjustment for over‐detection. Adjustment for leadtime and length bias but no over‐detection led to a 24% reduction ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542327</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542327</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Semiparametric smoothing of discrete failure time data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5501249&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100058</link>
            <description>AbstractAn estimator of the hazard rate function from discrete failure time data is obtained by semiparametric smoothing of the (nonsmooth) maximum likelihood estimator, which is achieved by repeated multiplication of a Markov chain transition‐type matrix. This matrix is constructed so as to have a given standard discrete parametric hazard rate model, termed the vehicle model, as its stationary hazard rate. As with the discrete density estimation case, the proposed estimator gives improved performance when the vehicle model is a good one and otherwise provides a nonparametric method comparable to the only purely nonparametric smoother discussed in the literature. The proposed semiparametric smoothing approach is then extended to hazard models with covariates and is illustrated by applica...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5501249</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5501249</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Semi‐parametric area under the curve regression method for diagnostic studies with ordinal data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5492727&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100025</link>
            <description>AbstractThe classification accuracy of new diagnostic tests is based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is one of the well‐accepted summary measures for describing the accuracy of diagnostic tests. The AUC summary measure can vary by patient and testing characteristics. Thus, the performance of the test may be different in certain subpopulation of patients and readers. For this purpose, we propose a direct semi‐parametric regression model for the non‐parametric AUC measure for ordinal data while accounting for discrete and continuous covariates. The proposed method can be used to estimate the AUC value under degenerate data where certain rating categories are not observed. We will discuss the non‐standard asymptotic theory, since t...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5492727</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5492727</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Updating risk prediction tools: A case study in prostate cancer</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5417776&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100062</link>
            <description>This article reports on the application of Bayes rule for updating risk prediction tools to include a set of biomarkers measured in an external study to the original study used to develop the risk prediction tool. The procedure is illustrated in the context of updating the online Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator to incorporate the new markers %freePSA and [‐2]proPSA measured on an external case–control study performed in Texas, U.S.. Recent state‐of‐the art methods in validation of risk prediction tools and evaluation of the improvement of updated to original tools are implemented using an external validation set provided by the U.S. Early Detection Research Network. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5417776</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5417776</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nonparametric Bayesian estimation of the three‐way receiver operating characteristic surface</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5396991&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100070</link>
            <description>We describe a nonparametric Bayesian approach for estimating the three‐way ROC surface based on mixtures of finite Polya trees (MFPT) priors. Mixtures of finite Polya trees are robust models that can handle nonstandard features in the data. We address the difficulties in modeling continuous diagnostic data with skewness, multimodality, or other nonstandard features, and how parametric approaches can lead to misleading results in such cases. Robust, data‐driven inference for the ROC surface and for the volume under the ROC surface is obtained. A simulation study is performed to assess the performance of the proposed method. Methods are applied to data from a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study on human immunodeficiency virus patients. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5396991</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5396991</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Robust estimation for the Cox regression model based on trimming</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5396990&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100008</link>
            <description>AbstractWe propose a robust Cox regression model with outliers. The model is fit by trimming the smallest contributions to the partial likelihood. To do so, we implement a Metropolis‐type maximization routine, and show its convergence to a global optimum. We discuss global robustness properties of the approach, which is illustrated and compared through simulations. We finally fit the model on an original and on a benchmark data set. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5396990</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5396990</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On familywise type I error control for multiplicity in equivalence trials with three or more treatments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5396989&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100073</link>
            <description>AbstractFor the all pairwise comparisons for equivalence of k (k≥2) treatments Lauzon and Caffo proposed simply to divide the type I error level α by k−1 to achieve a Bonferroni‐based familywise error control when declaring pairs of two treatments equivalent. This rule is shown to be too liberal for k≥4. It works for k=3 yet for reasons not considered by Lauzon and Caffo. Based on the two one‐sided testing procedures and using the closure test principle we develop valid alternatives based on Bonferroni's inequality. The set H of intersection hypotheses reveals a rich structure, leading to the possibility to present H as a directed acyclic graph (DAG). This in turn allows using some graph theoretical theorems and eases proving properties of the resulting multiple testing problems...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5396989</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5396989</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Development of gatekeeping strategies in confirmatory clinical trials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5396988&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100036</link>
            <description>AbstractThis paper discusses multiplicity issues arising in confirmatory clinical trials with hierarchically ordered multiple objectives. In order to protect the overall type I error rate, multiple objectives are analyzed using multiple testing procedures. When the objectives are ordered and grouped in multiple families (e.g. families of primary and secondary endpoints), gatekeeping procedures are employed to account for this hierarchical structure. We discuss considerations arising in the process of building gatekeeping procedures, including proper use of relevant trial‐specific information and criteria for selecting gatekeeping procedures. The methods and principles discussed in this paper are illustrated using a clinical trial in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. (Source: Biome...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5396988</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5396988</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5396987&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190015</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5396987</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5396987</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mast Head: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5396986&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190014</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5396986</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5396986</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5396985&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190013</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5396985</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5396985</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multi‐stage transitional models with random effects and their application to the Einstein aging study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5343624&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900259</link>
            <description>In this study, we assess the influence of risk factors on the transitions among three cognitive status: cognitive stability (normal cognition for age), memory impairment, and clinical dementia. We have developed a shared random effects model that not only links the propensity of transitions and to the probability of informative missingness due to death, but also incorporates heterogeneous transition between subjects. We evaluate four approaches using generalized logit and four using proportional odds models to the first‐order Markov transition probabilities as a function of covariates. Random effects were incorporated into these models to account for within‐subject correlations. Data from the Einstein Aging Study are used to evaluate the goodness‐of‐fit of these models using the Ak...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5343624</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5343624</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multiplicity issues in clinical trials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5343623&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100177</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5343623</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5343623</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Note on simultaneous inferences about non‐inferiority and superiority for a primary and a secondary endpoint</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5330925&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000247</link>
            <description>AbstractIn their review of challenges to multiple testing in clinical trials, Hung and Wang (2010) considered the situation where a treatment is to be compared with an active comparator and the aim is to show non‐inferiority and (if possible) superiority with respect to a primary and a secondary endpoint. This note extends their discussion of this particular situation, taking the sequentially rejective procedure they used for illustration as a starting point. Some alternative multiple testing procedures (MTPs) are considered, and corresponding simultaneous confidence regions are discussed that provide additional information “for free”. The choice may then be based on the properties of these MTPs and corresponding confidence regions. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5330925</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5330925</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Simultaneous Inference in Regression. W. Liu (2011). Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN: 978‐1‐4398‐2809‐0</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5321664&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100147</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5321664</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5321664</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multiple imputation methods for inference on cumulative incidence with missing cause of failure</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5355523&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000175</link>
            <description>AbstractAnalysis of cumulative incidence (sometimes called absolute risk or crude risk) can be difficult if the cause of failure is missing for some subjects. Assuming missingness is random conditional on the observed data, we develop asymptotic theory for multiple imputation methods to estimate cumulative incidence. Covariates affect cause‐specific hazards in our model, and we assume that separate proportional hazards models hold for each cause‐specific hazard. Simulation studies show that procedures based on asymptotic theory have near nominal operating characteristics in cohorts of 200 and 400 subjects, both for cumulative incidence and for prediction error. The methods are illustrated with data on survival after breast cancer, obtained from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5355523</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5355523</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Marginal structural models for estimating principal stratum direct effects under the monotonicity assumption</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5343622&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100085</link>
            <description>AbstractIn epidemiological and clinical research, investigators are frequently interested in estimating the direct effect of a treatment on an outcome that is not relayed by intermediate variables. In 2009, VanderWeele presented marginal structural models (MSMs) for estimating direct effects based on interventions on the mediator. This paper focuses on direct effects based on principal stratification, i.e. principal stratum direct effects (PSDEs), which are causal effects within latent subgroups of subjects where the mediator is constant, regardless of the exposure status. We propose MSMs for estimating PSDEs. We demonstrate that the PSDE can be estimated readily using MSMs under the monotonicity assumption. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5343622</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5343622</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On tree intensity estimation for forest inventories: Some statistical issues</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5330924&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000193</link>
            <description>AbstractThe effect of the plot shape, number of subplots and their spatial arrangement on the sample variance for spatially explicit point populations is analysed for a simple intensity estimator. We derive the sample variance and covariance for sampling designs involving more than one subplot. Some numerical approximations are also presented. If a clustered point pattern has to be sampled, the best strategy to reduce the sample variance is to consider as many rectangular subplots as possible, for a prescribed total sample area, distributed over a grid. In contrast, if a regular point pattern is to be sampled, then a single circular subplot should be considered. If we assume that the point configuration is Poisson, then we can consider any subplot shape and spatial distribution ensuring no...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5330924</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5330924</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Spatial Statistics and Spatio‐temporal Data. Covariance Functions and Directional Properties. M. Sherman (2011). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978‐470‐69958‐4</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5321663&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100166</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5321663</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5321663</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Latent variable modeling paradigms for genotype‐trait association studies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5191376&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000218</link>
            <description>AbstractCharacterizing associations among multiple single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within and across genes, and measures of disease progression or disease status will potentially offer new insight into disease etiology and disease progression. However, this presents a significant analytic challenge due to the existence of multiple potentially informative genetic loci, as well as environmental and demographic factors, and the generally uncharacterized and complex relationships among them. Latent variable modeling approaches offer a natural framework for analysis of data arising from these population‐based genetic association investigations of complex diseases as they are well‐suited to uncover simultaneous effects of multiple markers. In this manuscript we describe application ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5191376</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5191376</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A simple and flexible Holm gatekeeping procedure</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5191375&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000040</link>
            <description>AbstractMajor objectives of a clinical trial are commonly stated in a hierarchical order as primary and secondary. The parallel gatekeeping testing strategy provides an opportunity to assess secondary objectives when all or partial primary objectives are achieved. The current available gatekeeping procedures have different pros and cons so users either need to justify the assumption associated with some procedures or tolerate suboptimal power performance of other procedures. By applying the Holm test with a flexible alpha splitting technique, we propose a procedure which (1) is powerful for assessing the primary objectives, (2) can be used when no assumption can be made on the dependency structure of test statistics, and (3) has the full flexibility to allocate user‐preferred alpha to as...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5191375</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5191375</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5191374&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190012</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5191374</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5191374</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mast Head: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5191373&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190011</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5191373</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5191373</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5191372&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190010</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5191372</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5191372</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Semiparametric estimation in copula models for bivariate sequential survival times</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5155851&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000131</link>
            <description>AbstractSequentially observed survival times are of interest in many studies but there are difficulties in analyzing such data using nonparametric or semiparametric methods. First, when the duration of followup is limited and the times for a given individual are not independent, induced dependent censoring arises for the second and subsequent survival times. Non‐identifiability of the marginal survival distributions for second and later times is another issue, since they are observable only if preceding survival times for an individual are uncensored. In addition, in some studies a significant proportion of individuals may never have the first event. Fully parametric models can deal with these features, but robustness is a concern. We introduce a new approach to address these issues. We ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5155851</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5155851</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A two‐part mixed‐effects pattern‐mixture model to handle zero‐inflation and incompleteness in a longitudinal setting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5155850&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000190</link>
            <description>AbstractTwo‐part regression models are frequently used to analyze longitudinal count data with excess zeros, where the same set of subjects is repeatedly observed over time. In this context, several sources of heterogeneity may arise at individual level that affect the observed process. Further, longitudinal studies often suffer from missing values: individuals dropout of the study before its completion, and thus present incomplete data records. In this paper, we propose a finite mixture of hurdle models to face the heterogeneity problem, which is handled by introducing random effects with a discrete distribution; a pattern‐mixture approach is specified to deal with non‐ignorable missing values. This approach helps us to consider overdispersed counts, while allowing for association b...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5155850</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5155850</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Environmental and Ecological Statistics with R. Song S. Qian (2010). Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978‐1‐4200‐6206‐9</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5117234&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100120</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5117234</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5117234</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Letter to the Editor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5085320&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100071</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5085320</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5085320</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Optimal weight in estimating and comparing areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve using longitudinal data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5085319&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100033</link>
            <description>AbstractIn the setting of longitudinal study, subjects are followed for the occurrence of some dichotomous outcome. In many of these studies, some markers are also obtained repeatedly during the study period. Emir et al. introduced a non‐parametric approach to the estimation of the area under the ROC curve of a repeated marker. Their non‐parametric estimate involves assigning a weight to each subject. There are two weighting schemes suggested in their paper: one for the case when within‐patient correlation is low, and the other for the case when within‐subject correlation is high. However, it is not clear how to assign weights to marker measurements when within‐patient correlation is modest. In this paper, we consider the optimal weights that minimize the variance of the estimate...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5085319</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5085319</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Logistic regression when covariates are random effects from a non‐linear mixed model</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5048415&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000142</link>
            <description>AbstractIn many studies, the association of longitudinal measurements of a continuous response and a binary outcome are often of interest. A convenient framework for this type of problems is the joint model, which is formulated to investigate the association between a binary outcome and features of longitudinal measurements through a common set of latent random effects. The joint model, which is the focus of this article, is a logistic regression model with covariates defined as the individual‐specific random effects in a non‐linear mixed‐effects model (NLMEM) for the longitudinal measurements. We discuss different estimation procedures, which include two‐stage, best linear unbiased predictors, and various numerical integration techniques. The proposed methods are illustrated using...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5048415</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5048415</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Computational Statistics. An Introduction to R. G. Sawitzki (2009). Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC Press. ISBN 978‐1‐4200‐8678‐2</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5048416&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100138</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5048416</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5048416</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Analysis of covariance with pre‐treatment measurements in randomized trials: Comparison of equal and unequal slopes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5155849&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100065</link>
            <description>AbstractIn randomized trials, an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is often used to analyze post‐treatment measurements with pre‐treatment measurements as a covariate to compare two treatment groups. Random allocation guarantees only equal variances of pre‐treatment measurements. We hence consider data with unequal covariances and variances of post‐treatment measurements without assuming normality. Recently, we showed that the actual type I error rate of the usual ANCOVA assuming equal slopes and equal residual variances is asymptotically at a nominal level under equal sample sizes, and that of the ANCOVA with unequal variances is asymptotically at a nominal level, even under unequal sample sizes. In this paper, we investigated the asymptotic properties of the ANCOVA with unequal slo...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5155849</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5155849</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Graphical approaches for multiple comparison procedures using weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or parametric tests</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5124499&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000239</link>
            <description>AbstractThe confirmatory analysis of pre‐specified multiple hypotheses has become common in pivotal clinical trials. In the recent past multiple test procedures have been developed that reflect the relative importance of different study objectives, such as fixed sequence, fallback, and gatekeeping procedures. In addition, graphical approaches have been proposed that facilitate the visualization and communication of Bonferroni‐based closed test procedures for common multiple test problems, such as comparing several treatments with a control, assessing the benefit of a new drug for more than one endpoint, combined non‐inferiority and superiority testing, or testing a treatment at different dose levels in an overall and a subpopulation. In this paper, we focus on extended graphical appr...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5124499</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5124499</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Joint modelling of longitudinal and time‐to‐event data with application to predicting abdominal aortic aneurysm growth and rupture</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5117233&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100052</link>
            <description>We present classical and Bayesian implementations of the shared random effects model and highlight the advantages of the latter for making predictions. We then apply the models described to a study of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) to investigate the association between AAA diameter and the hazard of AAA rupture. Out‐of‐sample predictions of future AAA growth and hazard of rupture are derived from Bayesian posterior predictive distributions, which are easily calculated within an MCMC framework. Finally, using a multivariate survival sub‐model we show that underlying diameter rather than the rate of growth is the most important predictor of AAA rupture. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5117233</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5117233</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Authors' reply</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5085318&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100103</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5085318</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5085318</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sensitivity analysis for causal inference using inverse probability weighting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5048414&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100042</link>
            <description>AbstractEvaluation of impact of potential uncontrolled confounding is an important component for causal inference based on observational studies. In this article, we introduce a general framework of sensitivity analysis that is based on inverse probability weighting. We propose a general methodology that allows both non‐parametric and parametric analyses, which are driven by two parameters that govern the magnitude of the variation of the multiplicative errors of the propensity score and their correlations with the potential outcomes. We also introduce a specific parametric model that offers a mechanistic view on how the uncontrolled confounding may bias the inference through these parameters. Our method can be readily applied to both binary and continuous outcomes and depends on the cov...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5048414</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5048414</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Approximate nonparametric corrected‐score method for joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data measured with error</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4991861&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000180</link>
            <description>AbstractWe consider the problem of jointly modeling survival time and longitudinal data subject to measurement error. The survival times are modeled through the proportional hazards model and a random effects model is assumed for the longitudinal covariate process. Under this framework, we propose an approximate nonparametric corrected‐score estimator for the parameter, which describes the association between the time‐to‐event and the longitudinal covariate. The term nonparametric refers to the fact that assumptions regarding the distribution of the random effects and that of the measurement error are unnecessary. The finite sample size performance of the approximate nonparametric corrected‐score estimator is examined through simulation studies and its asymptotic properties are als...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4991861</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4991861</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4991860&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190009</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4991860</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4991860</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mast Head: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4991859&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190008</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4991859</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4991859</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4991858&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190007</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4991858</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4991858</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>R Programming for Bioinformatics. R. Gentleman (2009). Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC. ISBN 978‐1‐4200‐6367‐7</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4920122&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100105</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4920122</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4920122</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Introduction to General and Generalized Linear Models. Madsen, H. and Thyregod, (P. 2011). Boca Raton, FL, USA: Chapman and Hall. ISBN: 978‐1‐4200‐9155‐7</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4847270&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100090</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4847270</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4847270</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Robust estimation and inference for bivariate line‐fitting in allometry</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4944276&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000018</link>
            <description>AbstractIn allometry, bivariate techniques related to principal component analysis are often used in place of linear regression, and primary interest is in making inferences about the slope. We demonstrate that the current inferential methods are not robust to bivariate contamination, and consider four robust alternatives to the current methods – a novel sandwich estimator approach, using robust covariance matrices derived via an influence function approach, Huber's M‐estimator and the fast‐and‐robust bootstrap. Simulations demonstrate that Huber's M‐estimators are highly efficient and robust against bivariate contamination, and when combined with the fast‐and‐robust bootstrap, we can make accurate inferences even from small samples. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4944276</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4944276</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bayesian analysis of non‐linear differential equation models with application to a gut microbial ecosystem</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4932443&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000250</link>
            <description>AbstractProcess models specified by non‐linear dynamic differential equations contain many parameters, which often must be inferred from a limited amount of data. We discuss a hierarchical Bayesian approach combining data from multiple related experiments in a meaningful way, which permits more powerful inference than treating each experiment as independent. The approach is illustrated with a simulation study and example data from experiments replicating the aspects of the human gut microbial ecosystem. A predictive model is obtained that contains prediction uncertainty caused by uncertainty in the parameters, and we extend the model to capture situations of interest that cannot easily be studied experimentally. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4932443</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4932443</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Handbook of Adaptive Designs in Pharmaceutical and Clinical Development. A. Pong and S. C. Chow (2010). Boca Raton: Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC Press. ISBN 978‐1‐4398‐1016‐3</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4920121&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100106</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4920121</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4920121</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Two‐sample density‐based empirical likelihood tests for incomplete data in application to a pneumonia study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4910481&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000235</link>
            <description>AbstractIn clinical trials examining the incidence of pneumonia it is a common practice to measure infection via both invasive and non‐invasive procedures. In the context of a recently completed randomized trial comparing two treatments the invasive procedure was only utilized in certain scenarios due to the added risk involved, and given that the level of the non‐invasive procedure surpassed a given threshold. Hence, what was observed was bivariate data with a pattern of missingness in the invasive variable dependent upon the value of the observed non‐invasive observation within a given pair. In order to compare two treatments with bivariate observed data exhibiting this pattern of missingness we developed a semi‐parametric methodology utilizing the density‐based empirical likel...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4910481</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4910481</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Use of pretransformation to cope with extreme values in important candidate features</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4882773&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000189</link>
            <description>AbstractExtreme values in predictors often strongly affect the results of statistical analyses in high‐dimensional settings. Although they frequently occur with most high‐throughput techniques, the problem is often ignored in the literature. We suggest to use a very simple transformation, proposed before in a different context by Royston and Sauerbrei, as an intermediary step between array preprocessing and high‐level statistical analysis. This straightforward univariate transformation identifies extreme values in continuous features and can thus be used as a diagnostic tool for outliers. The use of the transformation and its effects is demonstrated for diverse univariate and multivariate statistical analyses using nine publicly available microarray data sets. (Source: Biometrical Jo...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4882773</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4882773</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Homogeneity test of rate ratios in stratified matched‐pair studies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4861334&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000074</link>
            <description>AbstractThis paper investigates homogeneity test of rate ratios in stratified matched‐pair studies on the basis of asymptotic and bootstrap‐resampling methods. Based on the efficient score approach, we develop a simple and computationally tractable score test statistic. Several other homogeneity test statistics are also proposed on the basis of the weighted least‐squares estimate and logarithmic transformation. Sample size formulae are derived to guarantee a pre‐specified power for the proposed tests at the pre‐given significance level. Empirical results confirm that (i) the modified score statistic based on the bootstrap‐resampling method performs better in the sense that its empirical type I error rate is much closer to the pre‐specified nominal level than those of other te...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4861334</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4861334</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Modeling and testing treated tumor growth using cubic smoothing splines</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4852338&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000098</link>
            <description>AbstractHuman tumor xenograft models are often used in preclinical study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of a certain compound or a combination of certain compounds. In a typical human tumor xenograft model, human carcinoma cells are implanted to subjects such as severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice. Treatment with test compounds is initiated after tumor nodule has appeared, and continued for a certain time period. Tumor volumes are measured over the duration of the experiment. It is well known that untreated tumor growth may follow certain patterns, which can be described by certain mathematical models. However, the growth patterns of the treated tumors with multiple treatment episodes are quite complex, and the usage of parametric models is limited. We propose using cubic smo...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4852338</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4852338</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A statistical model for under‐ or overdispersed clustered and longitudinal count data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4847269&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000076</link>
            <description>AbstractWe propose a likelihood‐based model for correlated count data that display under‐ or overdispersion within units (e.g. subjects). The model is capable of handling correlation due to clustering and/or serial correlation, in the presence of unbalanced, missing or unequally spaced data. A family of distributions based on birth‐event processes is used to model within‐subject underdispersion. A computational approach is given to overcome a parameterization difficulty with this family, and this allows use of common Markov Chain Monte Carlo software (e.g. WinBUGS) for estimation. Application of the model to daily counts of asthma inhaler use by children shows substantial within‐subject underdispersion, between‐subject heterogeneity and correlation due to both clustering of mea...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4847269</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4847269</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Selection models with monotone weight functions in meta analysis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4819746&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000240</link>
            <description>AbstractPublication bias, the fact that studies identified for inclusion in a meta analysis do not represent all studies on the topic of interest, is commonly recognized as a threat to the validity of a meta analysis. One way to explicitly model publication bias is via weighted probability distributions. We adopt the non‐parametric approach initially introduced by Dear and Begg (1992) but impose that the weight function w is monotonely non‐increasing as a function of the p‐value. Since in meta analysis one typically only has few studies or “observations,” regularization of the estimation problem seems sensible. In addition, virtually all parametric weight functions proposed so far in the literature are in fact decreasing. We discuss how to estimate a decreasing weight function in...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4819746</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4819746</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A new location–scale test based on a combination of the ideas of Levene and Lepage</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788221&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000162</link>
            <description>AbstractLepage's test combines the Wilcoxon rank‐sum and the Ansari–Bradley statistics. We propose to replace the latter statistic by a Wilcoxon rank‐sum calculated after Levene's transformation. We use the medians for this transformation, i.e. absolute deviations from sample medians are calculated. The new location–scale test can be carried out as a permutation test based on permutations of the original observations, the Levene transformation has to be applied for each permutation in an intermediate step to calculate the test statistic. Simulations indicate that the new test can be more powerful than an O'Brien‐type test and Lepage's test, the latter is the standard nonparametric location–scale test. The new test is illustrated using real data about colony sizes of yellow‐ey...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788221</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788221</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Analysis of covariance with pre‐treatment measurements in randomized trials under the cases that covariances and post‐treatment variances differ between groups</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788220&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000200</link>
            <description>In conclusion, the ANCOVA with equal slopes can be asymptotically justified under random allocation. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788220</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788220</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On easily interpretable multivariate reference regions of rectangular shape</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788219&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000147</link>
            <description>AbstractTill now, multivariate reference regions have played only a marginal role in the practice of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The major reason for this fact is that such regions are traditionally determined by means of concentration ellipsoids of multidimensional Gaussian distributions yielding reference limits which do not allow statements about possible outlyingness of measurements taken in specific diagnostic tests from a given patient or subject. As a promising way around this difficulty we propose to construct multivariate reference regions as p‐dimensional rectangles or (in the one‐sided case) rectangular half‐spaces whose edges determine univariate percentile ranges of the same probability content in each marginal distribution. In a first step, the correspon...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788219</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788219</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ROC curve inference for best linear combination of two biomarkers subject to limits of detection</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788218&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000083</link>
            <description>AbstractThe receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a tool commonly used to evaluate biomarker utility in clinical diagnosis of disease. Often, multiple biomarkers are developed to evaluate the discrimination for the same outcome. Levels of multiple biomarkers can be combined via best linear combination (BLC) such that their overall discriminatory ability is greater than any of them individually. Biomarker measurements frequently have undetectable levels below a detection limit sometimes denoted as limit of detection (LOD). Ignoring observations below the LOD or substituting some replacement value as a method of correction has been shown to lead to negatively biased estimates of the area under the ROC curve for some distributions of single biomarkers. In this paper, we develop asy...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788218</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788218</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Laplace approximation in measurement error models</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788217&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000095</link>
            <description>AbstractLikelihood analysis for regression models with measurement errors in explanatory variables typically involves integrals that do not have a closed‐form solution. In this case, numerical methods such as Gaussian quadrature are generally employed. However, when the dimension of the integral is large, these methods become computationally demanding or even unfeasible. This paper proposes the use of the Laplace approximation to deal with measurement error problems when the likelihood function involves high‐dimensional integrals. The cases considered are generalized linear models with multiple covariates measured with error and generalized linear mixed models with measurement error in the covariates. The asymptotic order of the approximation and the asymptotic properties of the Laplac...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788217</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788217</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788216&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190006</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788216</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788216</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mast Head: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788215&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190005</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788215</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788215</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4788214&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190004</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4788214</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4788214</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dimension reduction in survival regressions with censored data via an imputed spline approach</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718987&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000168</link>
            <description>AbstractDimension reduction methods have been proposed for regression analysis with predictors of high dimension, but have not received much attention on the problems with censored data. In this article, we present an iterative imputed spline approach based on principal Hessian directions (PHD) for censored survival data in order to reduce the dimension of predictors without requiring a prespecified parametric model. Our proposal is to replace the right‐censored survival time with its conditional expectation for adjusting the censoring effect by using the Kaplan–Meier estimator and an adaptive polynomial spline regression in the residual imputation. A sparse estimation strategy is incorporated in our approach to enhance the interpretation of variable selection. This approach can be imp...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718987</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718987</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Non‐homogeneous Markov process models with informative observations with an application to Alzheimer's disease</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4714063&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000122</link>
            <description>AbstractIdentifying risk factors for transition rates among normal cognition, mildly cognitive impairment, dementia and death in an Alzheimer's disease study is very important. It is known that transition rates among these states are strongly time dependent. While Markov process models are often used to describe these disease progressions, the literature mainly focuses on time homogeneous processes, and limited tools are available for dealing with non‐homogeneity. Further, patients may choose when they want to visit the clinics, which creates informative observations. In this paper, we develop methods to deal with non‐homogeneous Markov processes through time scale transformation when observation times are pre‐planned with some observations missing. Maximum likelihood estimation via ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4714063</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4714063</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Understanding Computational Bayesian Statistics. W. M. Bolstad (2010). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. ISBN 978‐0‐470‐04609‐8.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4703656&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100031</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4703656</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4703656</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Assessing inter‐rater reliability when the raters are fixed: Two concepts and two estimates</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4614712&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000066</link>
            <description>AbstractIntraclass correlation (ICC) is an established tool to assess inter‐rater reliability. In a seminal paper published in 1979, Shrout and Fleiss considered three statistical models for inter‐rater reliability data with a balanced design. In their first two models, an infinite population of raters was considered, whereas in their third model, the raters in the sample were considered to be the whole population of raters. In the present paper, we show that the two distinct estimates of ICC developed for the first two models can both be applied to the third model and we discuss their different interpretations in this context. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4614712</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4614712</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Geographic Spread of Infectious Diseases: Models and Applications. Lisa Sattenspiel (2009). Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978‐0‐691‐12132‐1.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4610239&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201100022</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4610239</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4610239</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Semiparametric estimation for joint modeling of colorectal cancer risk and functional biomarkers measured with errors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4590522&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000070</link>
            <description>AbstractThis research is motivated by a pilot colorectal adenoma study, where the outcome of interest is the presence of colorectal adenoma representing risk for colorectal cancer, and the predictors of interest are protein biomarkers that are repeatedly measured with errors along the length of a microscopic structure in the human colon, the colon crypt. Biomarkers of this type are referred to as functional biomarkers. The investigators are interested in identifying features of functional biomarkers that are associated with risk for colorectal cancer. In this paper, we investigate a joint modeling approach, where the binary clinical outcome is modeled using a logistic regression model with the unobserved true functional biomarkers as the predictors. Most existing methods are developed eith...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4590522</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4590522</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4549401&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190003</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4549401</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4549401</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4549400&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190002</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4549400</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4549400</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An overview of techniques for linking high‐dimensional molecular data to time‐to‐event endpoints by risk prediction models</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4488847&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000152</link>
            <description>AbstractAnalysis of molecular data promises identification of biomarkers for improving prognostic models, thus potentially enabling better patient management. For identifying such biomarkers, risk prediction models can be employed that link high‐dimensional molecular covariate data to a clinical endpoint. In low‐dimensional settings, a multitude of statistical techniques already exists for building such models, e.g. allowing for variable selection or for quantifying the added value of a new biomarker. We provide an overview of techniques for regularized estimation that transfer this toward high‐dimensional settings, with a focus on models for time‐to‐event endpoints. Techniques for incorporating specific covariate structure are discussed, as well as techniques for dealing with mo...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4488847</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4488847</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Leveraging external knowledge on molecular interactions in classification methods for risk prediction of patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4488846&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000155</link>
            <description>This article aims to give an overview of such current methods as well as the databases, where this external knowledge can be obtained from. For illustration, two recent methods are compared in detail, a feature selection approach for support vector machines as well as a boosting approach for regression models. As a practical example, data on patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia are considered, where the binary endpoint “relapse within first year” should be predicted. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4488846</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4488846</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Confidence scores for prediction models</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4488845&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000157</link>
            <description>AbstractIn medical statistics, many alternative strategies are available for building a prediction model based on training data. Prediction models are routinely compared by means of their prediction performance in independent validation data. If only one data set is available for training and validation, then rival strategies can still be compared based on repeated bootstraps of the same data. Often, however, the overall performance of rival strategies is similar and it is thus difficult to decide for one model. Here, we investigate the variability of the prediction models that results when the same modelling strategy is applied to different training sets. For each modelling strategy we estimate a confidence score based on the same repeated bootstraps. A new decomposition of the expected B...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4488845</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4488845</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Assessment of evaluation criteria for survival prediction from genomic data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4459293&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000048</link>
            <description>AbstractSurvival prediction from high‐dimensional genomic data is dependent on a proper regularization method. With an increasing number of such methods proposed in the literature, comparative studies are called for and some have been performed. However, there is currently no consensus on which prediction assessment criterion should be used for time‐to‐event data. Without a firm knowledge about whether the choice of evaluation criterion may affect the conclusions made as to which regularization method performs best, these comparative studies may be of limited value. In this paper, four evaluation criteria are investigated: the log‐rank test for two groups, the area under the time‐dependent ROC curve (AUC), an R2‐measure based on the Cox partial likelihood, and an R2‐measure b...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4459293</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4459293</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Correction of confounding bias in non‐randomized studies by appropriate weighting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4459292&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000154</link>
            <description>AbstractIn non‐randomized studies, the assessment of a causal effect of treatment or exposure on outcome is hampered by possible confounding. Applying multiple regression models including the effects of treatment and covariates on outcome is the well‐known classical approach to adjust for confounding. In recent years other approaches have been promoted. One of them is based on the propensity score and considers the effect of possible confounders on treatment as a relevant criterion for adjustment. Another proposal is based on using an instrumental variable. Here inference relies on a factor, the instrument, which affects treatment but is thought to be otherwise unrelated to outcome, so that it mimics randomization. Each of these approaches can basically be interpreted as a simple rewei...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4459292</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4459292</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Discrimination measures for survival outcomes: Connection between the AUC and the predictiveness curve</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4459291&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000153</link>
            <description>AbstractFinding out biomarkers and building risk scores to predict the occurrence of survival outcomes is a major concern of clinical epidemiology, and so is the evaluation of prognostic models. In this paper, we are concerned with the estimation of the time‐dependent AUC – area under the receiver‐operating curve – which naturally extends standard AUC to the setting of survival outcomes and enables to evaluate the discriminative power of prognostic models. We establish a simple and useful relation between the predictiveness curve and the time‐dependent AUC – AUC(t). This relation confirms that the predictiveness curve is the key concept for evaluating calibration and discrimination of prognostic models. It also highlights that accurate estimates of the conditional absolute risk...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4459291</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4459291</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Incorporating short‐term outcome information to predict long‐term survival with discrete markers</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4501199&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000150</link>
            <description>AbstractIn disease screening and prognosis studies, an important task is to determine useful markers for identifying high‐risk subgroups. Once such markers are established, they can be incorporated into public health practice to provide appropriate strategies for treatment or disease monitoring based on each individual's predicted risk. In the recent years, genetic and biological markers have been examined extensively for their potential to signal progression or risk of disease. In addition to these markers, it has often been argued that short‐term outcomes may be helpful in making a better prediction of disease outcomes in clinical practice. In this paper we propose model‐free non‐parametric procedures to incorporate short‐term event information to improve the prediction of a lo...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4501199</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4501199</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comparison of procedures to assess non‐linear and time‐varying effects in multivariable models for survival data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4488844&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000159</link>
            <description>AbstractThe focus of many medical applications is to model the impact of several factors on time to an event. A standard approach for such analyses is the Cox proportional hazards model. It assumes that the factors act linearly on the log hazard function (linearity assumption) and that their effects are constant over time (proportional hazards (PH) assumption). Variable selection is often required to specify a more parsimonious model aiming to include only variables with an influence on the outcome. As follow‐up increases the effect of a variable often gets weaker, which means that it varies in time. However, spurious time‐varying effects may also be introduced by mismodelling other parts of the multivariable model, such as omission of an important covariate or an incorrect functional ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4488844</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4488844</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical epidemiology and individualized medicine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4464103&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000257</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4464103</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4464103</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Measures of prediction error for survival data with longitudinal covariates</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4459290&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000145</link>
            <description>We present theoretical results of the conditional prediction error, especially regarding the comparison of different prediction rules and its behavior in the presence of misspecification of the link between longitudinal covariates and survival time. A simulation study investigating the performance of its estimator in finite sample sizes rounds off this paper. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4459290</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4459290</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4432725&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000078</link>
            <description>AbstractConcerns have been raised about the use of traditional measures of model fit in evaluating risk prediction models for clinical use, and reclassification tables have been suggested as an alternative means of assessing the clinical utility of a model. Several measures based on the table have been proposed, including the reclassification calibration (RC) statistic, the net reclassification improvement (NRI), and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), but the performance of these in practical settings has not been fully examined. We used simulations to estimate the type I error and power for these statistics in a number of scenarios, as well as the impact of the number and type of categories, when adding a new marker to an established or reference model. The type I error was ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4432725</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4432725</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On responder analyses when a continuous variable is dichotomized and measurement error is present</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393660&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000069</link>
            <description>AbstractIn clinical studies results are often reported as proportions of responders, i.e. the proportion of subjects who fulfill a certain response criterion is reported, although the underlying variable of interest is continuous. In this paper, we consider the situation where a subject is defined as a responder if the (error‐free) continuous measurements post‐treatment are below a certain fraction of (error‐free) continuous measurements obtained pre‐treatment. Focus is on the one‐sample case, but an extension to the two‐sample case is also presented. The bias of different estimates for the proportion of responders is derived and compared. In addition, an asymptotically unbiased ML‐type estimate for the proportion of responders is presented. The results are illustrated using ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393660</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393660</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A semiparametric estimator of the bivariate distribution function for censored gap times</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393657&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000063</link>
            <description>AbstractLet (T1, T2) be gap times corresponding to two consecutive events, which are observed subject to random right‐censoring. In this paper, a semiparametric estimator of the bivariate distribution function of (T1, T2) and, more generally, of a functional E [φ(T1,T2)] is proposed. We assume that the probability of censoring for T2 given the (possibly censored) gap times belongs to a parametric family of binary regression curves. We investigate the conditions under which the introduced estimator is consistent. We explore the finite sample behavior of the estimator and of its bootstrap standard error through simulations. The main conclusion of this paper is that the semiparametric estimator may be much more efficient than purely nonparametric methods. Real data illustration is included...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393657</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393657</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Imputing unobserved values with the EM algorithm under left and right‐truncation, and interval censoring for estimating the size of hidden populations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393656&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000004</link>
            <description>AbstractCapture–recapture techniques have been used for considerable time to predict population size. Estimators usually rely on frequency counts for numbers of trappings; however, it may be the case that these are not available for a particular problem, for example if the original data set has been lost and only a summary table is available. Here, we investigate techniques for specific examples; the motivating example is an epidemiology study by Mosley et al., which focussed on a cholera outbreak in East Pakistan. To demonstrate the wider range of the technique, we also look at a study for predicting the long‐term outlook of the AIDS epidemic using information on number of sexual partners. A new estimator is developed here which uses the EM algorithm to impute unobserved values and th...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393656</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393656</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quantifying the impact of fixed effects modeling of clusters in multiple imputation for cluster randomized trials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393655&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000140</link>
            <description>AbstractIn cluster randomized trials (CRTs), identifiable clusters rather than individuals are randomized to study groups. Resulting data often consist of a small number of clusters with correlated observations within a treatment group. Missing data often present a problem in the analysis of such trials, and multiple imputation (MI) has been used to create complete data sets, enabling subsequent analysis with well‐established analysis methods for CRTs. We discuss strategies for accounting for clustering when multiply imputing a missing continuous outcome, focusing on estimation of the variance of group means as used in an adjusted t‐test or ANOVA. These analysis procedures are congenial to (can be derived from) a mixed effects imputation model; however, this imputation procedure is not...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393655</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393655</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bayesian inference for disease prevalence using negative binomial group testing</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393654&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000148</link>
            <description>AbstractGroup testing, also known as pooled testing, and inverse sampling are both widely used methods of data collection when the goal is to estimate a small proportion. Taking a Bayesian approach, we consider the new problem of estimating disease prevalence from group testing when inverse (negative binomial) sampling is used. Using different distributions to incorporate prior knowledge of disease incidence and different loss functions, we derive closed form expressions for posterior distributions and resulting point and credible interval estimators. We then evaluate our new estimators, on Bayesian and classical grounds, and apply our methods to a West Nile Virus data set. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393654</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393654</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Optimal sampling in retrospective logistic regression via two‐stage method</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393653&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900253</link>
            <description>In this study, we propose a two‐stage sequential analysis, in which the optimal sample fraction and the required sample size to achieve a predetermined volume of a joint confidence set are estimated in an interim analysis. Additionally required observations are collected in the second stage according to the estimated optimal sample fraction. At the end of the experiment, data from these two stages are combined and analyzed for statistical inference. Simulation studies are conducted to justify the proposed two‐stage procedure and an example is presented for illustration. It is found that the proposed two‐stage procedure performs adequately in the sense that the resultant joint confidence set has a well‐controlled volume and achieves the required coverage probability. Furthermore, th...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393653</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393653</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393652&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190001</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393652</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393652</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4393651&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201190000</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4393651</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:31:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4393651</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>When should one adjust for measurement error in baseline variables in observational studies?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4349059&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000038</link>
            <description>AbstractPreviously, we showed that in randomised experiments, correction for measurement error in a baseline variable induces bias in the estimated treatment effect, and conversely that ignoring measurement error avoids bias. In observational studies, non‐zero baseline covariate differences between treatment groups may be anticipated. Using a graphical approach, we argue intuitively that if baseline differences are large, failing to correct for measurement error leads to a biased estimate of the treatment effect. In contrast, correction eliminates bias if the true and observed baseline differences are equal. If this equality is not satisfied, the corrected estimator is also biased, but typically less so than the uncorrected estimator. Contrasting these findings, we conclude that there mu...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4349059</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4349059</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Application of multistate models in hospital epidemiology: Advances and challenges</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4349058&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000146</link>
            <description>AbstractSurvival analysis has established itself as a major statistical technique in medical research. Applications in hospital epidemiology, however, are only beginning to emerge. One reason for this delay is that usually complete follow‐up of patients in hospital is feasible. This overview discusses where survival techniques provide additional insight into hospital epidemiology, and where they are, in fact, needed even in the absence of right‐censoring. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4349058</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4349058</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Detecting and adjusting for small‐study effects in meta‐analysis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4349057&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000151</link>
            <description>AbstractPublication bias and related types of small‐study effects threaten the validity of systematic reviews. The existence of small‐study effects has been demonstrated in empirical studies. Small‐study effects are graphically diagnosed by inspection of the funnel plot. Though observed funnel plot asymmetry cannot be easily linked to a specific reason, tests based on funnel plot asymmetry have been proposed. Beyond a vast range of funnel plot tests, there exist several methods for adjusting treatment effect estimates for these biases. In this article, we consider the trim‐and‐fill method, the Copas selection model, and more recent regression‐based approaches. The methods are exemplified using a meta‐analysis from the literature and compared in a simulation study, based on bi...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4349057</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4349057</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quantifying the predictive accuracy of time‐to‐event models in the presence of competing risks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4349056&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000073</link>
            <description>AbstractPrognostic models for time‐to‐event data play a prominent role in therapy assignment, risk stratification and inter‐hospital quality assurance. The assessment of their prognostic value is vital not only for responsible resource allocation, but also for their widespread acceptance. The additional presence of competing risks to the event of interest requires proper handling not only on the model building side, but also during assessment. Research into methods for the evaluation of the prognostic potential of models accounting for competing risks is still needed, as most proposed methods measure either their discrimination or calibration, but do not examine both simultaneously. We adapt the prediction error proposal of Graf et al. (Statistics in Medicine 1999, 18, 2529–2545) a...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4349056</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4349056</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Handbook of Spatial Statistics. A. E. Gelfand, P. J. Diggle, M. Fuentes and P. Guttorp (2010). Boca Raton, London, New York, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC. ISBN 978‐1‐4200‐7287‐7.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4349055&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000234</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4349055</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4349055</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Applied Biostatistics for the Health Sciences. R. J. Rossi (2010). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978‐0‐470‐14764‐1.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264431&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000215</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264431</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264431</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Impacts on type I error rate with inappropriate use of learn and confirm in confirmatory adaptive design trials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4252589&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900207</link>
            <description>AbstractA two‐stage adaptive design trial is a single trial that combines the learning data from stage 1 (or phase II) and the confirming data in stage 2 (or phase III) for formal statistical testing. We call it a “Learn and Confirm” trial. The studywise type I error rate remains to be at issue in a “Learn and Confirm” trial. For studying multiple doses or multiple enpdoints, a “Learn and Confirm” adaptive design can be more attractive than a fixed design approach. This is because intuitively the learning data in stage 1 should not be subjected to type I error scrutiny if there is no formal interim analysis performed and only an adaptive selection of design parameters is made at stage 1. In this work, we conclude from extensive simulation studies that the intuition is most of...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4252589</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4252589</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Basic ideas and concepts for multiple comparison procedures</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4252588&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000028</link>
            <description>AbstractAround 1970, the author proposed a general theoretical approach to multiple decision problems (MDPs) of which multiple comparison problems (MCPs) are special cases. Suppose that a sample space is given together with a set of probability distributions defined over . Let a finite partition of the parameter space be given. Based on the observation , an MDP is to decide, which ωa the true parameter θ belongs to. An MD confidence procedure is a mapping ψ from to the class of subsets of A, such that the probability that includes the true parameter θ is not smaller than 1−αθ. Here, 1−αθ is called the level of the confidence procedures and may vary depending on θ∈ωa. The MP confidence procedures are derived from the following proposition. When the ωa's are mutually disjoin...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4252588</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4252588</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MCP2009 – 6th International Conference on Multiple Comparison Procedures</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4252587&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000195</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4252587</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4252587</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4252586&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201090008</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4252586</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4252586</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4252585&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201090007</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4252585</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4252585</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multivariate Statistik. R. Schlittgen (2009). Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH. ISBN: 978‐3‐486‐58595‐7.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4189358&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000202</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4189358</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4189358</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Simultaneous and selective inference: Current successes and future challenges</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4182657&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900299</link>
            <description>AbstractThe previous decade can be viewed as a second golden for era Multiple Comparisons research. I argue that much of the success stems from our being able to address real current needs. At the same time, this success generated a plethora of concepts for error rate and power, as well as multiplicity of methods for addressing them. These confuse the users of our methodology and pose a threat. To avoid the threat, it is our responsibility to match our theoretical goals to the goals of the users of statistics. Only then should we match the methods to the theoretical goals. Considerations related to such needs are discussed: simultaneous inference or selective inference, testing or estimation, decision making or scientific reporting. I then further argue that the vitality of our field in th...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4182657</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4182657</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Higher order inference for the consensus mean in inter‐laboratory studies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4241233&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000032</link>
            <description>AbstractIn inter‐laboratory studies, a fundamental problem of interest is inference concerning the consensus mean, when the measurements are made by several laboratories which may exhibit different within‐laboratory variances, apart from the between laboratory variability. A heteroscedastic one‐way random model is very often used to model this scenario. Under such a model, a modified signed log‐likelihood ratio procedure is developed for the interval estimation of the common mean. Furthermore, simulation results are presented to show the accuracy of the proposed confidence interval, especially for small samples. The results are illustrated using an example on the determination of selenium in non‐fat milk powder by combining the results of four methods. Here, the sample size is sm...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4241233</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4241233</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Augmented p‐rep designs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4200078&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000102</link>
            <description>AbstractEarly generation variety trials are very important in plant and tree breeding programs. Typically many entries are tested, often with very little resources available. Unreplicated trials using control plots are popular and it is common to repeat the trials at a number of locations. An alternative is to use p‐rep designs, where a proportion of the test entries are replicated at each location; this can obviate the need for control plots. α‐Designs are commonly used for replicated variety trials and we show how these can be adapted to produce efficient p‐rep designs. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4200078</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4200078</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Robust Methods in Biostatistics. S. Heritier, E. Cantoni, S. Copt and M.‐P. Victoria‐Feser (2009).Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. ISBN: 978‐0‐470‐02726‐4.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4189357&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000194</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4189357</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4189357</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Parameter estimation following an adaptive treatment selection trial design</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4182656&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900134</link>
            <description>AbstractTwo‐stage, drop‐the‐losers designs for adaptive treatment selection have been considered by many authors. The distributions of conditional sufficient statistics and the Rao–Blackwell technique were used to obtain an unbiased estimate and to construct an exact confidence interval for the parameter of interest. In this paper, we characterize the selection process from a binomial drop‐the‐losers design using a truncated binomial distribution. We propose a new estimator and show that it is asymptotically consistent with a large sample size in either the first stage or the second stage. Supported by simulation analyses, we recommend the new estimator over the naive estimator and the Rao–Blackwell‐type estimator based on its robustness in the finite‐sample setting. We f...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4182656</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4182656</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Estimation of the diagnostic threshold accounting for decision costs and sampling uncertainty</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104873&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900294</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104873</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104873</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A novel definition of the multivariate coefficient of variation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104872&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000030</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104872</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104872</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Modelling animal growth in random environments: An application using nonparametric estimation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104871&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900273</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104871</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104871</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A note on the tests for clustered matched‐pair binary data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104870&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000035</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104870</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104870</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multiple imputation for estimating the risk of developing dementia and its impact on survival</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104869&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900266</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104869</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104869</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Simulation‐based power calculations for large cohort studies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104868&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900277</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104868</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104868</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Adaptive dose‐finding: Proof of concept with type I error control</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104867&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900222</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104867</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104867</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104866&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201090006</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104866</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104866</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4104865&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201090005</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4104865</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4104865</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>&quot;Classification of Therapy Resistance Based on Longitudinal Biomarker Profiles&quot; by M. Kohlmann, L. Held and V. P. Grunert Biometrical Journal (2009) 51(4):610-626 Article: . Authors' reply:</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3815888&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000054</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3815888</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3815888</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Robust linear mixed models using the skew t distribution with application to schizophrenia data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3815890&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900184</link>
            <description>We present an efficient alternating expectation-conditional maximization (AECM) algorithm for the computation of maximum likelihood estimates of parameters on the basis of two convenient hierarchical formulations. The techniques for the prediction of random effects and intermittent missing values under this model are also investigated. Our methodologies are illustrated through an application to schizophrenia data. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3815890</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3815890</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Laplace regression with censored data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3815889&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900310</link>
            <description>We consider a regression model where the error term is assumed to follow a type of asymmetric Laplace distribution. We explore its use in the estimation of conditional quantiles of a continuous outcome variable given a set of covariates in the presence of random censoring. Censoring may depend on covariates. Estimation of the regression coefficients is carried out by maximizing a non-differentiable likelihood function. In the scenarios considered in a simulation study, the Laplace estimator showed correct coverage and shorter computation time than the alternative methods considered, some of which occasionally failed to converge. We illustrate the use of Laplace regression with an application to survival time in patients with small cell lung cancer. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3815889</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3815889</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Adaptive Dc‐optimal designs for dose finding based on a continuous efficacy endpoint</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4026887&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900214</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4026887</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4026887</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bounds on controlled direct effects under monotonic assumptions about mediators and confounders</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4017668&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000051</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4017668</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4017668</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multiple Testing Procedures with Applications to Genomics. S. Dudoit and M. J. van der Laan (2008). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. ISBN: 978‐0‐387‐49316‐9.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3998078&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000174</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3998078</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3998078</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Internal pilots for observational studies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3983222&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000050</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3983222</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3983222</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Statistik. Einführung in die computergestützte Datenanalyse. 4th edition. K. Zwerenz (2009). Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag. ISBN: 978‐3‐486‐59112‐5.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3953429&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000137</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3953429</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3953429</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Likelihood inference for a two‐stage design with treatment selection</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3932732&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900170</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3932732</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3932732</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A hierarchical Bayesian approach to multiple testing in disease mapping</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3920220&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900209</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3920220</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3920220</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multivariate one‐sided multiple comparison procedure with a control based on the approximate likelihood ratio test</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3907042&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900203</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3907042</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3907042</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Authors' reply</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3890352&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000119</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3890352</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3890352</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Inference for meta‐analysis with a suspected temporal trend</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3890351&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900307</link>
            <description>Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3890351</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3890351</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contents: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3890350&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201090004</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3890350</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3890350</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial Board: Biometrical Journal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3890349&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201090003</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3890349</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3890349</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Directional multivariate tests rejecting null and negative effects in all variables</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3801921&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900254</link>
            <description>This paper suggests two directional multivariate tests that aim at establishing superiority of a treatment over a control in at least one of several endpoints that are assumed to have a multivariate normal distribution. One of these tests is a one-sided, scale-invariant version of the classical Hotelling T2-test. The other is based on a summary score with weights derived from the data. Both tests overcome an important shortcoming of previous &quot;one-sided&quot; multivariate suggestions, namely that the null hypothesis was restricted to a single point in the multidimensional parameter space. The derivation of the tests is supplemented by simulations investigating their performance and by the application in an osteoporosis trial. (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3801921</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3801921</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Capture–recapture analysis with a latent class model allowing for local dependence and observed heterogeneity</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3854056&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900051</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3854056</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3854056</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Capture-recapture analysis with a latent class model allowing for local dependence and observed heterogeneity</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3801922&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900051</link>
            <description>In epidemiology, capture-recapture models are commonly used to estimate the size of an unknown population based on several incomplete lists of individuals. The method operates under two main assumptions: independence between the lists (local independence) and homogeneity of capture probabilities of individuals. In practice, these assumptions are rarely satisfied. We introduce a multinomial latent class model that can account for both list dependence and heterogeneity. Parameter estimation is performed by maximizing the conditional likelihood function with the use of the EM algorithm. In addition, a new approach for evaluating the standard errors of the parameter estimates is discussed, which considerably reduces the computational burden associated with the evaluation of the variance of the...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3801922</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3801922</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>General solutions to consistency problems in multiple hypothesis testing</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3794189&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900218</link>
            <description>Coherence and consonance are the two important concepts to ensure consistent conclusions drawn from multiple tests. Unlike coherence, consonance of a multiple testing procedure (MTP) has not yet received much attention. Although most of the MTPs used in practice are consonant, cases still exist that dissonant tests have to be used due to their unique advantages, for example, the likelihood ratio tests and sum tests. Consonance adjustments are necessary for such tests to avoid difficulty in interpretation. Moreover, in terms of detecting elementary hypotheses, a consonant test procedure is uniformly more powerful than the corresponding dissonant one. In this paper, several general methods using the partitioning principle to construct (strongly) consonant and strongly coherent MTPs are propo...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3794189</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3794189</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hierarchical Bayesian inference for HIV dynamic differential equation models incorporating multiple treatment factors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3790208&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900173</link>
            <description>This article, motivated by an AIDS clinical study, discusses a hierarchical Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach to dynamic ODE models without a closed-form solution. In this model, we fully integrate viral load, medication adherence, drug resistance, pharmacokinetics, baseline covariates and time-dependent drug efficacy into the data analysis for characterizing long-term virologic responses. Our method is implemented by a data set from an AIDS clinical study. The results suggest that modeling HIV dynamics and virologic responses with consideration of time-varying clinical factors as well as baseline characteristics may be important for HIV/AIDS studies in providing quantitative guidance to better understand the virologic responses to ARV treatment and to help the evaluation ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3790208</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3790208</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meta‐analysis methodology for combining treatment effects from Cox proportional hazard models with different covariate adjustments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3854057&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900168</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3854057</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3854057</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meta-analysis methodology for combining treatment effects from Cox proportional hazard models with different covariate adjustments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3790209&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900168</link>
            <description>In Cox proportional hazard models with censored survival data, estimates of treatment effects with some important covariates omitted will be biased toward zero (Gail et al., Biometrika 71: 431-444). This can be especially problematic in meta-analyses that combine estimates of parameters from studies where different covariate adjustments are made. Presently, few constructive solutions have been provided to address this issue. In this paper, we review the existing meta-analysis methodologies for aggregated patient data (APD) and propose two meta-regression models (meta-ANOVA model and meta-polynomial model) with indicators of different covariates in Cox proportional hazard models to adjust the heterogeneity of treatment effects due to omitted covariates across studies. Both parametric and no...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3790209</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3790209</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A group sequential type design for three-arm non-inferiority trials with binary endpoints</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3771649&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900188</link>
            <description>The three-arm design with a test treatment, an active control and a placebo group is the gold standard design for non-inferiority trials if it is ethically justifiable to expose patients to placebo. In this paper, we first use the closed testing principle to establish the hierarchical testing procedure for the multiple comparisons involved in the three-arm design. For the effect preservation test we derive the explicit formula for the optimal allocation ratios. We propose a group sequential type design, which naturally accommodates the hierarchical testing procedure. Under this proposed design, Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of the sequential effect preservation test when the variance of the test statistic is estimated based on the restricted maximum like...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3771649</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3771649</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A group sequential type design for three‐arm non‐inferiority trials with binary endpoints</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3854058&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900188</link>
            <description>(Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3854058</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3854058</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Challenges to multiple testing in clinical trials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3710064&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900206</link>
            <description>Multiple testing problems are complex in evaluating statistical evidence in pivotal clinical trials for regulatory applications. However, a common practice is to employ a general and rather simple multiple comparison procedure to handle the problems. Applying multiple comparison adjustments is to ensure proper control of type I error rates. However, in many practices, the emphasis of the type I error rate control often leads to a choice of a statistically valid multiple test procedure but the common sense is overlooked. The challenges begin with confusions in defining a relevant family of hypotheses for which the type I error rates need to be properly controlled. Multiple testing problems are in a wide variety, ranging from testing multiple doses and endpoints jointly, composite endpoint, ...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3710064</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3710064</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of random and residual variance-covariance matrices in bivariate mixed effects models</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3655333&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900182</link>
            <description>Bivariate mixed effects models are often used to jointly infer upon covariance matrices for both random effects (u) and residuals (e) between two different phenotypes in order to investigate the architecture of their relationship. However, these (co)variances themselves may additionally depend upon covariates as well as additional sets of exchangeable random effects that facilitate borrowing of strength across a large number of clusters. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian extension of the classical bivariate mixed effects model by embedding additional levels of mixed effects modeling of reparameterizations of u-level and e-level (co)variances between two traits. These parameters are based upon a recently popularized square-root-free Cholesky decomposition and are readily interpretable, eac...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3655333</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3655333</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Scientific Data Mining: A Practical Perspective. Ch. Kamath (2009). Philadelphia, PA, USA: Siam. ISBN: 978-0-898716-75-7</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3647954&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000091</link>
            <description>No Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3647954</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3647954</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>&quot;Exact permutation tests for correlated binomial variables&quot; by J. Yu, J. L. Kepner and R. Iyer Biometrical Journal (2009) 51, 899-914 Article: . Authors' reply: .</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3675997&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000012</link>
            <description>No Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3675997</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3675997</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Letter to the Editor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3647955&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.201000012</link>
            <description>No Abstract (Source: Biometrical Journal)</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3647955</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3647955</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Two-sample nonparametric likelihood inference based on incomplete data with an application to a pneumonia study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3647960&amp;cid=s_33756_70_f&amp;fid=33756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1002%252Fbimj.200900131</link>
            <description>The clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) are important diagnostic variables of pneumonia for forcefully ventilated patients who are susceptible to nosocomial infection. Because of its invasive nature, BAL is performed for patients only if the CPIS is greater than a certain threshold value. Thus, CPIS and BAL are closely related, yet BAL values are substantially missing. In a randomized clinical trial, the control and oral treatment groups were compared based on the outcomes from these procedures. Because of the relevance of both outcomes with respect to evaluating the efficacy of treatments, we propose and examine a nonparametric test based on these outcomes, which employs the empirical likelihood methodology. While efficient parametric methods are ava...</description>
            <author>Biometrical Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3647960</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3647960</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

