<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Clinical Ethics via MedWorm.com</title>
        <description>MedWorm.com provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest items from the 'Clinical Ethics' source.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=Clinical+Ethics&t=Clinical+Ethics&s=Search&f=source]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:19:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Emerging themes in the everyday ethics of primary care: a report from an interdisciplinary workshop</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483565&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F211%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>We report key themes arising from a postgraduate workshop organized by the King's Interdisciplinary Discussion Society (KIDS) held in April 2011. KIDS believe that health is a phenomenon that transcends disciplinary boundaries, and therefore issues relating to health care and medical ethics are best addressed with an interdisciplinary approach. The workshop, entitled &amp;lsquo;Everyday Ethics and Primary Healthcare&amp;rsquo;, included poster presentations and oral presentations from participants from a range of disciplines and occupational backgrounds which highlighted the challenges faced by primary health-care workers. Three common themes emerged: the impersonal and cumbersome work environment that can result from the encroachment of rationalizing tools; the tension between &amp;lsquo;ethical prac...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483565</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483565</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote ... Rights, Regulation, and the Technological Revolution</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483564&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F207%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483564</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483564</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The shifting sands of patient autonomy and public interest considerations in health care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483563&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F203%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The past few decades have seen patient autonomy ascend to a prime position in health care. Patient consent is seen as a key component to expression of autonomy. Yet, interventions may also be justified without consent because they are deemed to be in the public interest. We observe some subtle shifts in balance in these justifications in health care and illustrate these with a range of examples. We hope thereby to stimulate a more explicit debate so that health-care professionals can manage these competing interests. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483563</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483563</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A chaplain's perspective on body donation and thanksgiving</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483562&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F200%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>All major religions accept that organ donation is an individual choice and the same is true when it comes to donating one's whole body to medical science. While religious groups have &amp;lsquo;official&amp;rsquo; views, it is common, given the various denominations and subgroups within a religion, to have deviation from the official message. This paper provides some insight into the views of religious leaders from one local community in the UK on the act of body donation. The paper also demonstrates the importance that the Abrahamic religions place on providing opportunities for remembrance and thanksgiving for those who have died and how this is extended through the services of thanksgiving that are held by medical schools for those who have donated their bodies to medical science. (Source: Clin...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483562</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483562</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Perspectives on anatomical donation and holding services of thanksgiving</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483561&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F195%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The value of human bodies for the teaching of anatomy has been recognized since the 16th century. Many medical students are exposed to the process of body donation as human dissection continues to play a fundamental role in many medical courses. The opportunity of dissection not only provides students with an educational approach to learning human structure but also exposes them to the emotions surrounding death and dying and the role of the anatomical donor in their journey. This paper explores the subject of body donation in relation to anatomical examination, the relationship the donor has to the medical student experience and the purpose of thanksgiving services. The paper concludes with a brief description of a study carried out at a UK medical school to seek the views of first- and s...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483561</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483561</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Donating bodily material: the Nuffield Council report</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483560&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F191%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The Nuffield Council on Bioethics' recent report on the ethics of the donation of bodily material for treatment and research (Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research. www.nuffieldbioethics.org/human-bodies) brings to the fore the much-debated question of how far society should go in trying to encourage people to donate their bodily material. Based on conclusions reached by the Working Party with respect to the duties of the stewardship state, the role of altruism and of solidarity, public interest in health-related research, the welfare of the donor and the importance of &amp;lsquo;professional values&amp;rsquo; such as trust and respect, the report presents an &amp;lsquo;Intervention Ladder&amp;rsquo; that sets out the ethical acceptability of various ways of encouraging people to donate. Policy...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483560</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483560</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethicality and confidentiality: is there an inverse-care issue in general practice ethics?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483559&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F186%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper discusses confidentiality as a routine issue of concern to British general practitioners participating in a qualitative study as well as in contemporaneous practice literature. While keen to reflect on routine issues, such as confidentiality, participants who professed a lack of expertise in medical ethics also perceived reluctance or inability to access educational resources or ethics support. Such lack of ability might include a perception of non-entitlement to access advice and support, a fear of criticism, or simply that resources fail to be advertised. Participants' insights are set alongside a concurrent debate in the professional literature over whether problems with maintaining confidentiality should be rigorously discussed in a public forum. A preliminary suggestion is ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483559</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483559</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ongoing processes of managing consent: the empirical ethics of using video-recording in clinical practice and research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483558&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F179%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Using video to facilitate data collection has become increasingly common in health research. Using video in research, however, does raise additional ethical concerns. In this paper we utilize family therapy data to provide empirical evidence of how recording equipment is treated. We show that families made a distinction between what was observed through the video by the reflecting team and what was being recorded onto videotape. We show that all parties actively negotiated what should and should not go &amp;lsquo;on the record&amp;rsquo;, with particular attention to sensitive topics and the responsibility of the therapist. Our findings have important implications for both clinical professionals and researchers using video data. We maintain that informed consent should be an ongoing process and wi...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483558</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483558</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ireland's restrictive abortion law: a threat to women's health and rights?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483557&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F172%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has recently handed down its judgement in the case of three women contesting the abortion law in the Republic of Ireland, which has one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the world. Although the Court ruled that Ireland had to clarify the current law following the success of one of the three claims, the failure of the other two claims allows Ireland to continue to enforce its law, which has an adverse effect on women's health. This paper, therefore, proposes an amendment to abortion legislation in the Republic of Ireland that would be compatible with safeguarding women's health, highlighting several circumstances in which the continuation of a pregnancy may have a detrimental impact on a woman's physical and/or mental health. (S...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483557</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483557</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Challenging some myths about the right to life at the end of life. 1: Not an absolute right</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483556&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F167%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article, and a related one in the next issue, investigates some myths surrounding the application of the right to life at the end of life. The present article focuses upon the myth that the right to life is an absolute right, always requiring the preservation of life. It identifies three distinct situations in which state authorities may be justified in declining to take intervening action in order to save a life. It argues that the right to life encompasses recognition of the impossibility and undesirability of preserving human life in all circumstances and that recognition of this fact will render the right more useful in a health-care context. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483556</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483556</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Key changes in the regulation of assisted reproduction introduced by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483555&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F162%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483555</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483555</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mainstreaming genetics: the potential for miscommunication</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483554&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F159%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483554</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483554</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 16: A request from an accident and emergency department - should we give our patient a blood transfusion?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483553&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F154%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483553</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483553</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The end of an era</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5483552&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F4%2F153%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5483552</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5483552</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Are some kidneys better than others? Clinical goals and the challenging ethical landscape</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204427&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F146%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The increasing shortage of donor kidneys available for transplantation combined with an ageing population has resulted in the use of expanded-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. These kidneys are associated with an increased risk of delayed graft function, acute rejection and reduced graft survival. This paper will cover the use of ECDs and the presentation of risk to patients receiving these organs. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204427</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204427</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Transplant research and deceased donors: laws, licences and fear of liability</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204426&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F140%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Transplantation research on samples and organs from deceased donors in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is under threat. The key problems relate to difficulties encountered in gaining consent for research projects, as distinct from consent to donation for clinical transplantation. They are due partly to the terms of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (the 2004 Act), and partly to its interpretation by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA). They include excessive interaction with donor representatives regarding &amp;lsquo;informed consent&amp;rsquo; to research projects, uncertainty as to the scope and duration of a donor's &amp;lsquo;authority&amp;rsquo; over an organ, and restrictions caused by the apparent need for licensing of transplantation research under the 2004 Act, combined with lack of certainty, or guidan...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204426</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204426</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Liver transplantation using 'donation after circulatory death' donors: the ethics of managing the end-of-life care of potential donors to achieve organs suitable for transplantation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204425&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F134%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The decline in organs donated after brain death has been countered by an increase in organs donated after circulatory death. Organs donated after circulatory death present an increased risk of complications for their eventual recipients when compared with organs donated after brain death, so the likelihood of successful transplantation is decreased. If organ donation is considered to be in the best interests of the patient, interventions that facilitate successful donation and transplantation might be permissible. This paper seeks to establish whether it is ethically permissible to manage the end-of-life care of a dying patient to maximize the chances of successful transplantation, and if so, whether it is permissible to further maximize these chances by managing the potential donor to ena...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204425</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204425</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Optimizing donor potential in the UK</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204424&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F127%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Rates of deceased organ donation in the UK fall well short of those reported from other parts of the world, and result in unnecessary deaths and avoidable morbidity. A particular feature of the UK problem is that its total potential for donation is lower than the actual number of donors reported in the highest-donating countries. This implies that while the identification, referral and conversion of recognized potential deceased donors is an important component of any strategic effort to increase donation, more fundamental is an understanding of why some countries have a greater potential for donation, particularly donation after brain death. While it is possible that these differences reflect a difference in the incidence catastrophic brain injury or the outcomes from it, it is also possi...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204424</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204424</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Supporting organ donation through end-of-life care: implications for heart-beating donation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204423&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F122%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>New protocols have been developed for donors after circulatory death involving early assessment of donor status and premortem supporting treatment in appropriate cases where there is evidence that the patient wished to be an organ donor. These donors are now making an increasingly marked impact on overall deceased donor numbers in the UK. Donors after brainstem death, on the other hand, are much less buoyant yet require the same flexibility in approach in order to improve rates of donation and to realize the wishes of potential deceased organ donors to the proper requisite extent. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204423</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204423</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The European Union Directive on Organ Donation and Transplantation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204422&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F117%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204422</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204422</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 15: A case study in surgical consent - Mr X's appendix</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204421&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F113%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204421</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204421</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The ethics of organ retrieval: goals, rights and responsibilities</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204420&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F111%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204420</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204420</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Farewell to a czar</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5204419&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F3%2F109%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5204419</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5204419</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best practices in clinical ethics consultation and decision-making</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983709&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F103%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The conference entitled &amp;lsquo;Best Practices in Clinical Ethics Consultation and Decision-Making&amp;rsquo;, held in London 8&amp;ndash;9 July 2010, was the first of its kind dedicated to identifying best practices in clinical ethics consultation and decision-making. Academics, health and social care professionals, clinical ethics committee members, lawyers, service users and carers from the UK, USA, Europe, Canada, Australia and Asia attended lectures, workshops, parallel paper sessions and clinical ethics case discussions across adult, maternity, children's, older persons, mental health and learning disabilities settings. Seventy-eight best-practice points impacting on the quality of clinical ethics consultations and subsequent decisions were identified and grouped into eight themes: who tells ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983709</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983709</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Empirical bioethics: coming to maturity?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983708&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F101%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983708</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983708</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why we wrote ... Medical profiling and online medicine: the ethics of 'personalised healthcare' in a consumer age</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983707&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F97%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983707</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983707</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>'Risky' research and participants' interests: the ethics of phase 2C clinical trials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983706&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F91%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Biomedical research involving human participants is highly regulated and subject to stringent ethical requirements. Clinical research ethics, regulation and policy have tended to focus almost exclusively on the protection of participants' interests against harms that might result from taking part in research. Less consideration, however, has been given to the interests that patients may themselves have in research participation, even in trials that may be beyond the bounds of current clinical research practice. In this paper, we consider the case of a suggested extension to clinical trial protocols to explore the ethics of participation in &amp;lsquo;risky&amp;rsquo; research. We argue that patients may have a strong interest in taking part in research, and that even when greater-than-usual risks ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983706</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983706</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cui bono? Can feminist ethics show a path in complex decision-making where 'classical' theories cannot?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983705&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F86%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>We present the case of a six-year-old child with a fatal brainstem tumour, who was left in a &amp;lsquo;locked-in state&amp;rsquo; post-decompressive biopsy. A discussion of the ethical dilemma this situation presents, together with the deliberations of the ethics service when consulted about the optimal course of action, follow. The issues raised highlight an important conflict between the parental view of what is in the child's best interests and what may appear, prima facie, to clinical staff, to be in that child's best interests. We discuss how creative ethical thinking may facilitate resolution of seemingly insoluble situations. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983705</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983705</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical issues in live donor kidney transplantation: attitudes of health-care professionals and patients towards marginal and elderly donors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983704&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F78%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Acceptance of elderly or marginal health individuals as kidney donors is debated, with practices varying between centres. Transplant recipients, live kidney donors and health-care professionals caring for patients with renal failure were surveyed regarding their views on live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) of marginal health (diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, obesity, etc.) and elderly donors. Participants were recruited within a tertiary renal and transplant centre and invited to participate in focus groups and structured interviews. They also completed an anonymous questionnaire. Of 464 participants who completed the questionnaire (36% health-care professionals and 64% patients), 49% and 64%, respectively, stated that marginal and elderly donors should be accepted for LDKT. I...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983704</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983704</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>'No-one fully responsible': a 'collusion of anonymity' protecting health-care bodies from manslaughter charges?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983703&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F68%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 establishes the statutory offence of corporate manslaughter, replacing the previous common law corporate liability for manslaughter. Health-care providers are potentially liable. This includes, but is not restricted to, National Health Service bodies. This paper considers the hypothetical liability of the various bodies involved in a well-known case of death arising from medical error, had the Act been in force when it occurred. The discussion illustrates the likelihood of difficulty in establishing liability. This difficulty arises not only from the requirements of the Act but also the involvement of several different bodies in the facts and circumstances of the fatal mistake. There are implications for a National Health Service w...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983703</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983703</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Treating those who are mentally disordered under the Mental Health Act 1983: Part 2</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983702&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F64%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983702</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983702</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 14: How should we transfer a euthanasia request between general practice and a hospital setting?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983701&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F58%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983701</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983701</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>From Cinderella to princess: how we should care for the elderly</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983700&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F56%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983700</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983700</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Courage, compassion and communication: young people and Huntington's disease</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983699&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F2%2F55%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983699</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983699</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote ... Medical Ethics and Medical Law - A Symbiotic Relationship</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652134&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F52%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652134</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652134</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Disability: a welfarist approach</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652133&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F45%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In this paper, we offer a new account of disability. According to our account, some state of a person's biology or psychology is a disability if that state makes it more likely that a person's life will get worse, in terms of his or her own wellbeing, in a given set of social and environmental circumstances. Unlike the medical model of disability, our welfarist approach does not tie disability to deviation from normal species&amp;rsquo; functioning, nor does it understand disability in essentialist terms. Like the social model of disability, the welfarist approach sees disability as a harmful state that results from the interaction between a person's biology and psychology and his or her surrounding environment. However, unlike the social model, it denies that the harm associated with disabili...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652133</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652133</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The case of Ashley X</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652132&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F39%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper recounts the events surrounding the case of Ashley X, a severely disabled young girl whose parents opted for oestrogen therapy, a hysterectomy and breast removal &amp;ndash; the so-called &amp;lsquo;Ashley treatment&amp;rsquo; &amp;ndash; in order to reduce her projected adult weight and improve her quality of life. Following a description of the events leading up to the procedure itself, and the worldwide debate which ensued, the main arguments in favour and against the procedures are presented. The paper also critically engages with a recent defence of the treatments presented by one of those closely involved with the case &amp;ndash; Dr D Diekema. Finally, the recommendations of a report which criticizes procedures at the hospital in which the treatments took place are described, and it is argue...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652132</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652132</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Discourses of disability and clinical ethics support</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652131&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F32%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>It is now broadly accepted that disability is a concept infused with both descriptive and evaluative meaning, such that invoking the concept of disability necessarily involves making judgements of moral value as well as describing certain facts about individuals. This paper aims to map the complex terrain that shapes our current understandings of disability by outlining five distinct &amp;lsquo;discourses of disability&amp;rsquo;. It is shown how the similarities and differences between the discourses hinge on different ways of making sense of the descriptive and evaluative dimensions of the concept, and the relationships between these dimensions. The paper concludes by considering the specific implications that these different ways of elucidating the concept of disability might have for the provi...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652131</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652131</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cancellations of elective surgery may cause an inferior postoperative course: the 'invisible hand' of health-care prioritization?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652130&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F27%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Elective surgery can be cancelled when resources are overwhelmed by emergency cases. We hypothesized that such cancellations, on psychological grounds, are followed also by inferior clinical results and we conducted a retrospective survey of patients following joint replacement surgery. Sixty patients having suffered from administrative cancellation prior to their operation during an 18-month period and with six months follow-up were identified and compared with another 60 matched patients after having the same type of surgery but without prior cancellation. All patients received questionnaires on complications and on visual analogue scale (VAS) assessment on subjective wellbeing and quality of life (QoL) at follow-up. The study group reported 50 complications versus 33 for controls (P &amp;lt...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652130</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652130</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Physician-assisted dying outlaws: self-appointed death in the Netherlands</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652129&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F20%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>No law in any jurisdiction that permits physician assisted dying offers individuals a medically assisted death without the need to comply with certain criteria. The Netherlands is no exception. There is evidence to suggest that physicians are averse to providing an assisted death even when the Dutch &amp;lsquo;due care criteria&amp;rsquo; have been met and the unbearable pain and suffering requirement is especially difficult to satisfy. Some individuals with an enduring desire to die who do not meet the &amp;lsquo;due care&amp;rsquo; criteria under the Dutch legislation turn to other means of achieving a self-appointed death. This paper explores two alternative methods of securing a self-determined death (an assisted death involving lay assistors or a self-hastened death by stopping eating and drinking), ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652129</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652129</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Children and health-care research: best treatment, best interests and best practice</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652128&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F15%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article focuses on the legal and ethical implications of recruiting into health-care research minors who are not competent to consent. It considers the role played by best interests in obtaining valid parental consent for the participation of children in research, both at common law and under the Regulations that govern clinical trials of medicinal products. In doing so it questions the legality of parental consent to children's involvement in research, and identifies some inconsistencies in parental understandings of best interests in relation to medical research and treatment. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652128</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652128</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Assessing and detaining those who are mentally disordered under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Mental Capacity Act 2005: Part 1</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652127&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F11%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652127</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652127</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 13: Should the school doctor contact the mother of a 17-year-old girl who has expressed suicidal thoughts?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652126&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F5%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652126</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652126</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Disability - ethical issues: a complex and under-recognized challenge in clinical ethics consultation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652125&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F2%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652125</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652125</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Entering the blogosphere</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4652124&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F6%2F1%2F1%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4652124</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4652124</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote... Handbook of Communication in Oncology and Palliative Care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360373&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F220%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360373</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360373</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An extra reason to roll the dice: balancing harm, benefit and autonomy in 'futile' cases</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360372&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F217%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Oncologists frequently have to break bad news to patients. Although they are not normally the ones who tell patients that they have cancer, they are the ones who have to tell patients that treatment is not working, and they are almost always the ones who have to tell them that they are going to die and that nothing more can be done to cure them. Perhaps the most difficult cases are those where further treatment is almost certainly futile, but there remains an extremely slim chance of yet more aggressive treatment having a near-miraculous effect. In such situations, it can be difficult for the oncologist to decide how to explain things to the patient, and how much to tell them. It can also be very difficult to achieve the correct balance between respecting the patient's autonomy and not exp...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360372</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360372</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Beyond informed choice: prenatal risk assessment, decision-making and trust</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360371&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F207%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In 2004, prenatal risk assessment (PRA) was implemented as a routine offer in Denmark, in order to give all pregnant women an informed choice about whether to undergo prenatal testing. PRA is a non-invasive intervention performed in the first trimester of pregnancy and measures the risk of a fetus having Down's syndrome or other chromosomal disorders. The risk figure provides the basis for action, i.e. the decision about whether or not to undergo invasive fetal testing via the maternal route (amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling), which, however, involves the risk of inducing a miscarriage. On the basis of ethnographic fieldwork in an ultrasound clinic in Denmark and interviews with pregnant women and their partners, this paper investigates how ideals such as autonomy and non-directi...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360371</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360371</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Online survey of the perceived need for ethics support in a large National Health Service Foundation Trust</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360370&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F201%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article explores the attitudes of consultants in a large UK teaching hospital to the need for formal clinical ethics support. Data obtained through an anonymous online questionnaire illustrate the ways in which consultants deal with clinical ethical dilemmas and their confidence in such decision-making. In the absence of formal ethics support a large proportion of consultants who took part in the survey said that they would consult with colleagues when faced with a clinical ethical dilemma and the majority considered that this satisfactorily resolved the issue. However, 80% of respondents stated that they would find a form of ethics support within the Trust to be useful. Consultants also noted the reasons for, and barriers to, using ethics support. The response rate to the survey was ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360370</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360370</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Death and best interests: a response to the legal challenge</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360369&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F195%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In an earlier paper I argued that we do not have an objective conception of best interests and that this is a particular problem because the courts describe that they use an &amp;lsquo;...objective approach or test. That test is the best interests of the patient&amp;rsquo; when choosing for children. I further argued that there was no obvious way in which we could hope to develop an objective notion of best interests. As well as this, I argued that a best-interest-based approach was a particular problem around the time of death of some children. A response from a legal perspective argued that, while there is not a clear conception of objective best interests, the courts have a well-described approach to finding a child's objective best interests. In this paper, I argue that without clear agreement...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360369</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360369</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Children, best interests and the courts: a response to Bridgeman</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360368&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F188%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In the context of critically ill children, Baines contended that the best interests test was neither objective nor coherent, and thus of little applicability in making end-of-life decisions. In reply, Bridgeman attempted to refute these claims through legal analysis and contended that the doctrine allowed for responsive, fact-specific, context-sensitive and prudential reasoning. This paper is a response to Bridgeman, and argues that an examination of case law reveals the subjective and value-laden nature of the test. Courts must make decisions in contested cases, but there is no reason to hold that a judge can divine the best interests of a critically ill child better than either parents or medical staff. This paper analyses a number of cases where judicial decisions appear at odds with th...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360368</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360368</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial: Critically ill children and best interests</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360367&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F184%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360367</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360367</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The best interests principle and providing treatment for adults without capacity in England and Wales</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360366&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F180%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360366</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360366</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee case 12: Our adolescent patient has a progressive life-limiting condition and impaired communication skills - how should decisions about her care be made?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360365&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F175%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360365</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360365</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Guiding practical care in feeding at the end of life</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360364&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F172%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360364</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360364</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Think before you click: setting personal boundaries for the acquisition of medical information</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4360363&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F4%2F171%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4360363</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4360363</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote ... Rights, Duties and the Body: Law and Ethics of the Maternal-Fetal Conflict</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030648&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F164%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(No summary is available for this citation) (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030648</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030648</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Being open with patients about medical error: challenges in practice</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030647&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F159%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>There is a significant body of evidence showing that patients want to know when they are harmed as a result of their medical care. In 2005 the National Patient Safety Agency issued guidance on the process to be followed when communicating errors to patients and their carers. However, there is still a significant gap between the rhetoric of being open and clinical practice. This gap reflects the competing interests arising from the concept of being open and the difficulties involved in the process itself. This paper presents several case studies to explore the complexities of being open and the organizational support required to overcome these. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030647</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030647</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Teaching and learning medical ethics and law in UK medical schools</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030646&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F156%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Teaching and learning of medical ethics and law are at the heart of medical education because they are integral to all clinical encounters and public health interventions, and a foundation in medical ethics and law is essential for students to become virtuous doctors. The first model curriculum for medical ethics and law within medical education in the UK, published in 1998, has recently been reviewed and updated. Now called a core content of learning, it emphasizes that teaching and learning of medical ethics and law should be attuned to the students' needs appropriate both to their particular stage of training and to relevant specialty-specific ethical issues; is a shared obligation of all teachers throughout the course; and should be integrated vertically and horizontally throughout the...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030646</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030646</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Parents' attitudes to neonatal research involving venepuncture</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030645&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F148%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In conclusion, parents participating or declining a neonatal study involving venepuncture are different, but participating parents were well informed and seemed able to judge that participation was right for them such that in consenting families venepuncture itself is not problematic. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030645</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030645</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Gaining and maintaining consent when capacity can be an issue: a research study with people with Huntington's disease</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030644&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F142%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In conclusion, this paper adds a pragmatic approach to the debate on informed consent by describing the development of a written information sheet and consent form being used in a current social research study. Particular emphasis is placed on the importance of written information being adapted according to the needs of potential participants. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030644</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030644</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030643&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F136%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>There is growing interest in clinical ethics. However, we still have sparse knowledge about what is actually going on in the everyday practice of clinical ethics consultations. This paper introduces a descriptive evaluation tool to present, discuss and compare how clinical ethics case consultations are actually carried out. The tool does not aim to define &amp;lsquo;best practice&amp;rsquo;. Rather, it facilitates concrete comparisons and evaluative discussions of the role, function, procedures and ideals inherent in clinical ethics case consultation practices. The tool was developed during meetings of the European Clinical Ethics Network. Based on written reports and participation in the network meetings, the development and the content of the tool and the results of its application in presenting...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030643</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030643</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Serious professional misconduct and the need for an apology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030642&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F130%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In this paper I argue that doctors who are found guilty of serious professional misconduct should be required to apologize as a condition of their registration. I argue that such a requirement is to be justified on the basis of the need to protect patients, maintain public confidence in the profession, and declare and uphold proper standards of conduct and behaviour. I also answer an objection that might be made to the position I defend. Finally, I consider whether there should be any exceptions to the demand for an apology from doctors who have been found guilty of serious professional misconduct. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030642</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030642</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A comment on the Director of Public Prosecution's Policy for Prosecutors in Respect of Cases of Encouraging or Assisting Suicide</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030641&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F125%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The Director of Public Prosecutions has recently released the Policy for Prosecutors in Respect of Cases of Encouraging or Assisting Suicide. These guidelines provide information on the factors that shall be considered when contemplating whether to bring a prosecution in the public interest in cases concerning assisting and encouraging suicide. While intended to clarify the potential liability of those engaged in or considering such practices, the guidelines have also stumbled into controversial and murky areas of law. As such any potential positive outcomes the guidelines may produce must be weighed against the potential confusion they may also cause. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030641</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030641</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The legal status of the fetus</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030640&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F122%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(No summary is available for this citation) (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030640</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030640</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 11: Is the insertion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in our patient's best interests?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030639&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F118%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(No summary is available for this citation) (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030639</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030639</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medical ethics and medical law: can you put it into practice?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030638&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F115%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(No summary is available for this citation) (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030638</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030638</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Communication: illusion or reality?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4030637&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F3%2F113%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(No summary is available for this citation) (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4030637</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:20:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4030637</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Spotlight on health and human rights</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671020&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F111%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671020</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671020</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote ... Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671019&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F108%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671019</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671019</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reflection and refraction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671018&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F103%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Personal narratives in which medical students and clinicians reflect on their education and practice, or recipients of health care reflect on their journey though the system can provide valuable insights which can usefully be shared. In this paper, a medical student describes the effect of a humanities-based student-selected component on her understanding of anatomy and dissection, and a junior doctor in Iraq learns some painful lessons about medicine and society during a night shift in the casualty department. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671018</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671018</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The role of guidelines in ethical competence-building: perceptions among research nurses and physicians</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671017&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F95%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The aim of the present study was to describe and explore the perception of ethical guidelines and their role in ethical competence-building among Swedish physicians and research nurses. Twelve informants were interviewed in depth. The results demonstrated that the informants had a critical attitude towards ethical guidelines and claimed to make little use of them in practical moral judgements. Ethical competence was seen primarily as character-building, related to virtues such as being empathic, honest and loyal to patients. Ethical competence was assumed to be learned through good examples, role models and practical experience, while ethical guidelines were not perceived as valuable in this process. In order to improve the staff's familiarity with and the usability of ethical guidelines, ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671017</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671017</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Consent to rapid treatment of eye tumours: is the waiting time too short at Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671016&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F86%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>We present the results of a questionnaire audit exploring the views of patients on how long they waited to undergo invasive procedures for intraocular melanoma. The findings inform a discussion of three plausible reasons for doubting the validity of consent to rapid intervention: the distress of diagnosis may temporarily undermine patients' capacity to choose; the decision may be too complex to make quickly; and rapid availability of treatment may be unduly influential, undermining the voluntariness of the decision. Using the example of enucleation, we argue that, with adequate safeguards, rapid intervention does not undermine the validity of patients' consent. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671016</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671016</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Consenting futures: professional views on social, clinical and ethical aspects of information feedback to embryo donors in human embryonic stem cell research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671015&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F77%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper reports from an ongoing multidisciplinary, ethnographic study that is exploring the views, values and practices (the ethical frameworks) drawn on by professional staff in assisted conception units and stem cell laboratories in relation to embryo donation for research purposes, particularly human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research, in the UK. We focus here on the connection between possible incidental findings and the circumstances in which embryos are donated for hESC research, and report some of the uncertainties and dilemmas of our staff participants. We explore the views of our study participants in relation to two themes: (1) rights to information and anticipating how donors might be informed about future research findings and (2) occupational work goals and trust. (Source:...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671015</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671015</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The challenges of seeking consent from adults to participate in acute research studies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671014&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F73%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In this paper the current legislative landscape and the challenges researchers face in obtaining informed consent in acute situations are explored. In such situations, some current guidelines can be difficult or impossible to apply. Capacity should be formally assessed before consent is sought to ensure that vulnerable persons are neither inappropriately recruited to a study nor denied the opportunity to participate. However, there is little guidance in current legislation as to how this should be achieved. When the patient is considered to be unable to provide prospective informed consent, other forms are sometimes permissible, although all have specific drawbacks. First, it is argued that a brief instrument, suitable for the acute situation, is needed to determine whether patients have t...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671014</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671014</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Autonomy and end-of-life advance directives in Italy: the courts' struggle against the political majority's attacks on constitutional rights</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671013&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F67%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper explores the significance of a landmark Italian judgement regarding end-of-life advance directives, emphasizing the legal and political context in which the decision was made. The analysis particularly focuses on the political majority's attempt to overturn the outcome of the courts' proceedings &amp;ndash; thereby challenging the country's institutional order and jeopardizing constitutional rights. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671013</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671013</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Research and adults without capacity</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671012&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F63%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671012</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671012</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 10: For the record: Should our patient's relatives be able to record her treatment?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671011&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F57%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671011</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671011</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Inside the Ethics Committee: bringing the ethical dilemmas of modern medicine to BBC Radio 4</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671010&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F54%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671010</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671010</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Empirical ethics: a growing area of bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671009&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F2%2F51%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671009</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:46:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671009</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote...Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279528&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F46%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279528</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279528</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Religious perspectives on embryo donation and research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279527&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F35%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The success of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) worldwide has led to an accumulation of frozen embryos that are surplus to the reproductive needs of those for whom they were created. In these situations, couples must decide whether to discard them or donate them for scientific research or for use by other infertile couples. While legislation and regulation may limit the decisions that couples make, their decisions are often shaped by their religious beliefs. Unfortunately, health professionals, scientists and policy-makers are often unaware of the way in which faith traditions view ART and decisions concerning the &amp;lsquo;fate&amp;rsquo; of surplus embryos. In this paper scholars representing six major religious traditions provide a commentary on a hypothetical case concerning the dona...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279527</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279527</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What parents find important when participating in longitudinal studies: results from a questionnaire</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279526&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F28%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The objective of the present paper is to explore parents' views on safety and confidentiality, information and consent, the importance of different kinds of research, and their responsibilities regarding children's participation. A questionnaire was distributed to 2500 families in south-east Sweden with children born during the years 1997&amp;ndash;1999; 1302 responded. The sample was chosen to include views of families with and without earlier research experience. A clear majority of responding parents stated that parents have a moral responsibility to let their children participate in research that is considered important, safe and moderately time-consuming. Respondents stressed the importance of thorough review and control of research involving children. Respondents also found it important ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279526</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279526</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The meanings of consent to the donation of cord blood stem cells: perspectives from an interview-based study of a public cord blood bank in England</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279525&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F22%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In conclusion, the positive finding of a commitment to mutuality in cord blood banking among these women is underlined, and its implications for the wider debate on cord blood banking are discussed. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279525</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279525</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Physical restraint of medical inpatients: unravelling the red tape</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279524&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F16%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Restraint has recently become an important legal and clinical issue in England and Wales with the introduction of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards introduced by the Mental Health Act 2007. The requirements of these two new pieces of legislation are complex, and therefore pose major challenges to the provision of high quality and patient-centred care, support and treatment in a range of health and social care settings. In this paper, the legal and ethical aspects of physical restraint in an acute medical care environment are considered, and practical guidance is provided to individuals adopting methods of restraint to care for general hospital patients. Aspects of the Introduction below are written in the first person to reflect the personal experiences...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279524</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279524</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How much information is 'enough'?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279523&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F13%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279523</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279523</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 9: Should we inform our patient about animal products in his medicine?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279522&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F7%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279522</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279522</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical issues and dementia: the Nuffield Report</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279521&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F3%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279521</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279521</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Shifting the focus</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3279520&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F5%2F1%2F1%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3279520</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3279520</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I Wrote ... Holding On? Vacant Possession, Paternity, Double Trouble, Right to Die - novels addressing key medical ethical dilemmas</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999168&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F213%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999168</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999168</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Splitting hairs over the definition of murder: Thomas Aquinas and the doctrine of double effect</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999167&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F211%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>A recent article in the March 2009 edition of Clinical Ethics stated that, &amp;lsquo;In the Summa Theologica, Thomas Aquinas discusses how murder may be justified in self defence&amp;rsquo;, provided that killing is not intended. This statement is open to challenge on historical and semantic grounds, with respect to the writings of the 13th Century Roman Catholic philosopher Thomas Aquinas (1225&amp;ndash;1274). A better appreciation of Aquinas' writings on this topic could inform the debate relating to medical end-of-life decisions. The normatively loaded word &amp;lsquo;murder&amp;rsquo; is not applicable to Aquinas' conclusion on unintended homicide, nor is it applicable to unintended homicide in current law, which is by definition not murder. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999167</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999167</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Substituted misjudgement</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999166&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F208%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>We present a remarkable case of family members exercising substituted misjudgement for a 42-year-old man hospitalized with multiorgan failure on life support. Feeling that their loved one would rather die than face severe disability, they elected to withdraw life support. Although this was done, the patient remained alive and recovered enough to clearly indicate his preference for life, even with severe disability. This case suggests that in instances of unusual quality-of-life judgements where the patient's wishes cannot be known with reasonable certainty, families and physicians should be very wary using substituted judgement to refuse life support. Unless there are strong considerations based on the patient's prior statements, actions and values to decline life support, it would seem et...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999166</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999166</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Confidentiality and consent in living kidney transplantation: is it essential for a donor to know that their recipient has HIV disease?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999165&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F202%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>It is now possible for someone with HIV disease to receive a kidney transplant from a living donor, although there is evidence only about the short-term outcomes of such a procedure. A person with HIV disease may not wish to disclose their diagnosis to a potential kidney donor. This paper argues that disclosure of the diagnosis of HIV to the donor is not necessary for informed consent. Concerns about the relationship of trust between the clinical team and the donor hold weight in deciding whether disclosure is essential, though openness about the limited nature of informed consent may facilitate a trusting relationship in the absence of disclosure. In general, the recipient's medical information should be treated as confidential, thereby avoiding any need to distinguish between HIV and oth...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999165</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999165</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Experiencing bad treatment: qualitative study of patient complaints concerning their treatment by public health-care practitioners in the County of Stockholm</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999164&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F195%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In conclusion, what patients react most strongly against is when health-care personnel treat them disrespectfully by not abiding by established social norms. The results indicate that the combination of failure in medical treatment and not receiving an apology often leads patients to complain to the Patients' Advisory Committee. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999164</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999164</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subject positions in research ethics committee letters: a discursive analysis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999163&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F187%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Ethical review of applications to conduct research projects continues to be a focus of scrutiny and controversy. We argue that attention to the actual practices of ethical review has the potential to inform debate. We explore how research ethics committees (RECs) establish their position and authority through the texts they use in their correspondence with applicants. Using a discursive analysis applied to 260 letters, we identify four positions of particular interest: RECs positioned as disinterested and responsible; as representing the interests of potential participants; as facilitating ethically sound, high-quality research; and as engaged in dialogue. These positions are used strategically to deflect criticism or complaint. This analysis has implications for reducing contestation betw...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999163</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999163</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cutting through red tape: non-therapeutic circumcision and unethical guidelines</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999162&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F181%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Current General Medical Council (GMC) guidelines state that any doctor who does not wish to carry out a non-therapeutic circumcision (NTC) on a boy must invoke conscientious objection. This paper argues that this is illogical, as it is clear that an ethical doctor will object to conducting a clinically unnecessary operation on a child who cannot consent simply because of the parents&amp;rsquo; religious beliefs. Comparison of the GMC guidelines with the more sensible British Medical Association guidance reveals that both are biased in favour of NTC and subvert standard consent procedures. It is further argued that any doctor who does participate in NTC of a minor may be guilty of negligence and in breach of the Human Rights Act. In fact, the GMC guidance implies that doctors must claim conscie...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999162</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999162</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Competent minors and health-care research: autonomy does not rule, okay?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999161&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F176%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article explores the tensions between law and ethics in relation to clinical research involving minors and concludes that greater respect should be given to the autonomy of those minors who are competent to decide for themselves. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999161</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999161</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Truth-telling in health care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999160&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F173%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999160</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999160</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee Case 8: Should we carry out a predictive genetic test in our young patient?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999159&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F169%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999159</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999159</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethics in collaborative global health research networks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999158&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F165%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999158</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999158</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Focusing clinicians on ethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999157&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F4%2F163%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999157</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999157</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote Children's Consent to Surgery</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757168&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F159%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757168</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757168</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Donating one's brain for research - a very personal perspective</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757167&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F156%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757167</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757167</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Strengths and limitations of considering patients as ethics 'actors' equal to doctors: reflections on the patients' position in a French clinical ethics consultation setting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757166&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F152%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The Clinical ethics centre in Paris offers its services equally to doctors and patients/proxies. Its primary goal is to re-equilibrate doctor&amp;ndash;patient roles through giving greater voice to patients individually in medical decisions. Patients are present at virtually all levels, initiating consults, providing their point of view and receiving feedback. The implications of patients' involvement are threefold. At an operational level, decision-making is facilitated by repositioning the debate on ethical grounds and introducing a dynamic of decisional partnership, although contact with patients can make it difficult to deny their demands and set the limits of our role. Ethically, it reinforces patients' autonomy and grants them a place of veritable ethics &amp;lsquo;actors&amp;rsquo;, with the da...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757166</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757166</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patient involvement in clinical ethics services: from access to participation and membership</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757165&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F146%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Ethics consultation is a novel paradigm in European health-care institutions. In this paper, patient involvement in all clinical ethics activities is scrutinized. It is argued that patients should have access to case consultation services via clearly defined access paths. However, the right of both health-care professionals and patients indicates that patients should not always be notified of a consultation. Ethics education, another well-established function of an ethics committee, should equally be available for patients, lay people and hospital staff. Beyond access and utilization, lay membership on a clinical ethics service is a matter of transparency, equal participation, empowerment and democratization. Lay and patient perspectives will contribute to the quality of ethics services on...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757165</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757165</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The role of patients in clinical ethics support: a snapshot of practices and attitudes in the United Kingdom</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757164&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F139%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This study reports the first specific investigation of patient contact with UK CECs. A questionnaire study was carried out with representatives from UK CECs. Results suggest that patient participation in clinical ethics consultation is low and unlikely to change significantly in the near future. Attitudes towards patients having a role in clinical ethics consultation are mixed, with a variety of reasons put forward both for and against patient participation. These results are discussed in the light of common themes in the literature and the practical and political context of clinical ethics support in the UK. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757164</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757164</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical ethics consultation in Europe: a comparative and ethical review of the role of patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757163&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F131%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Clinical ethics has developed significantly in Europe over the past 15 years and remains an evolving process. While sharing our experiences in different European settings, we were surprised to discover marked differences in our practice, especially regarding the position and role of patients. In this paper, we describe these differences, such as patient access to and participation or representation in ethics consults. We propose reasons to explain these differences, hypothesizing that they relate to the historic and sociocultural context of implementation of clinical ethics consultation services (Cecs), as well as the initial aims for which each structure was established. Then, we analyse those differences with common ethical arguments arising in patient involvement. We conclude that there...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757163</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757163</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Involving patients and relatives in a Norwegian clinical ethics committee: what have we learned?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757162&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F125%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>To date, few Norwegian clinical ethics committees (CECs) have included patients or next of kin in case discussions. In 2008, Rikshospitalet's (The National Hospital's) CEC began to routinely invite patients and relatives into case discussions. In this paper, we describe seven cases discussed by this committee in 2008. Six involved life and death decision-making in collaboration with the next of kin, while one related case did not include relatives. In our opinion, representing the patient's perspective was advantageous to the discussion itself, to the conclusion made and to the next of kin's acceptance of the resolution. We believe that if the patient had been represented in the last case, the outcome might have been different. We conclude that successful patient involvement will rely on w...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757162</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757162</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A plea for precaution with public health: the xenotransplantation example</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757161&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F119%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In this paper we argue that while individual private interests such as autonomy and the need for a medical procedure or treatment are important in the provision and delivery of health care and the utilization of biotechnologies, these concepts need to be balanced with other interests such that in certain situations they do not take priority. We use as an example a particular developing biotechnology, xenotransplantation, to suggest that interest in the health of the public is such that this biotechnology should not be permitted to move to the clinical trial stage because of the particular risk of harm it poses to the potential xeno-recipient, their close contacts and the wider population. This is despite the interest of those in need of a transplant in allowing such clinical trials to proc...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757161</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757161</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Planning for and managing pandemic influenza</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757160&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F116%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757160</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757160</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical ethics committee case 7: our young patient is in heart failure but has multiple co-morbidities. How can we best care for him and his family?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757159&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F111%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757159</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757159</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The role of patients in European clinical ethics consultation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2757158&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F3%2F109%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2757158</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2757158</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote... The Wounded Storyteller: a recollection of life and ethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432255&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F106%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432255</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432255</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obtaining consent from minors with parental responsibility</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432253&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F102%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article explores these controversies through four case scenarios. These scenarios are loosely based on the authors' prior experiences as paediatric surgeons. In light of current statutory guidance, and the paucity of legal precedent, there are few answers to be offered. However, exploring the issues, enabling them to be thoughtfully considered by health professionals, is in itself valuable. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432253</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432253</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical decision-making in two patients with locked-in syndrome on the intensive care unit</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432251&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F98%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In conclusion, most patients with LIS are competent and intellectually intact. In The Netherlands the autonomy of the patient is respected by law. In respecting this autonomy, medical choices can be different in comparable patients. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432251</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432251</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Use or ornament? Clinical ethics committees in infertility units: a qualitative study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432249&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F91%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper examines the role of clinical ethics committees (CECs) in infertility clinics in the UK, focusing on whether they usefully support infertility clinicians' ethical decision-making. The overall aim of the study reported here was to investigate how infertility clinicians approached and handled ethical problems in their everyday practice and this paper reports on one aspect of these data &amp;ndash; what they thought about the use of CECs. This paper gives an overview of what arrangements there are for such committees in infertility clinics; considers why the clinicians used CECs; and examines how these committees provided a useful function in the infertility setting and contributed to making &amp;lsquo;good&amp;rsquo; ethical decisions. Finally, the paper examines how the form of ethics suppor...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432249</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432249</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Being 'one cog in a bigger machine': a qualitative study investigating ethical challenges perceived by junior doctors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432247&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F85%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>There is increasing recognition among bioethicists that health-care practitioners' everyday ethical challenges ought to be the focus of ethical analysis. Interviews were conducted with Australian junior doctors to identify some of the kinds of situations that they found ethically challenging, as a basis for this type of grounded philosophical analysis and for further empirical research into junior doctors' ethical issues. Fourteen doctors in their first to fourth year of work from six hospitals in Melbourne participated. Issues discussed included involvement in treatment perceived as inappropriate, seniors discouraging disclosure of errors, coping when requested help was not forthcoming, observing behaviour perceived as unethical, truth-telling and informed consent. The difficulties descri...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432247</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432247</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Seven-year-old children's perceptions of participating in a comprehensive clinical birth cohort study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432245&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F79%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>While several studies have explored parents' perceptions of their children's participation in research, very few studies have described the children's own perceptions of their participation in research. The aim of this study was to describe children's perceptions of their participation in a comprehensive longitudinal clinical study. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 children aged seven participating in the Copenhagen Prospective Study on Asthma in Childhood. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using the template analysis method. The children rated their experiences with venepunctures on a Wong-Baker faces scale. The regular visits to the hospital and comprehensive clinical tests did not seem to have affected the children negatively. In parti...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432245</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432245</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Alcohol dependence in public policy: towards its (re)inclusion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432243&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F74%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Public policy on alcohol in the UK relies on health promotion campaigns that encourage individuals who misuse alcohol to make healthier choices about their drinking. Individuals with alcohol-dependence syndrome have an impaired capacity to choose health. As a result, individuals with the worst alcohol misuse problems lie largely outside the reach of choice-based policy. However, such policy has been widely criticized and efforts to reform it are underway. This paper argues that the British Medical Association's recent attempt to improve policy on alcohol in the UK by introducing strategies which have been shown to control drinking within populations still gives insufficient attention to alcohol dependence. This is because it fails accurately and consistently to characterize alcohol depende...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432243</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432243</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Should doctors ever be professionally required to change their attitudes?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432241&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F67%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The General Medical Council instructs doctors not to allow their personal beliefs to interfere with their practice. But if attitudes can threaten to impact negatively on a doctor's practice then the question arises: should doctors ever be professionally required to change their attitudes? In this paper I suggest that doctors should be required to amend their attitudes if two conditions are met, namely: (1) the doctor has an attitude that if neglected by the doctor will (or is very likely to) compromise his or her fitness to practise; and (2) the only way in which the doctor can prevent that attitude from compromising his or her fitness to practise is by changing the attitude. I also answer three objections that might be raised against the position that I advance. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432241</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432241</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Organ donation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432240&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F64%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432240</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432240</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee case 6: Our patient wishes to take an unlisted drug even though we're not sure of his diagnosis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432239&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F59%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432239</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432239</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mad dogs and (arguably) madder Scotsmen: biomedical ethics in an Asian context</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432238&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F57%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432238</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432238</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reflections on the ethics of translational research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2432237&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F2%2F55%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2432237</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2432237</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The rule of rescue in clinical practice</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192075&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F50%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>People often have a strong intuitive sense that we ought to rescue those in serious need, even in cases where we could produce better outcomes by acting in other ways. It has become common in such cases to refer to this as the Rule of Rescue. Within the medical field this rule has predominantly been discussed in relation to decisions about whether to fund particular treatments. While, in this setting, the arguments in favour of the Rule of Rescue have generally been found to be unconvincing, there are some reasons for thinking that it may have more of a role to play at the clinical level. In this article, we examine three lines that such reasoning might take. In each case, we argue that the reasons given do not support the adoption of a Rule of Rescue in clinical practice. (Source: Clinica...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192075</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192075</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>When is deception in research ethical?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192074&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F44%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article examines when deceptive withholding of information is ethically acceptable in research. The first half analyses the concept of deception. We argue that there are two types of accounts of deception: normative and non-normative, and argue that non-normative accounts are preferable. The second half of the article argues that the relevant ethical question which ethics committees should focus on is not whether the person from whom the information is withheld will be deceived, but rather on the reasonableness of withholding the information from the person who is deceived. We further argue that the reasonableness of withholding information is dependent on the context. The last section examines how the context of research should shape our judgements about the circumstances in which wi...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192074</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192074</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hope and terminal illness: false hope versus absolute hope</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192073&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F38%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Sustaining hope in patients is an important element of health care, allowing improvement in patient welfare and quality of life. However in the palliative care context, with patients who are terminally ill, it might seem that in order to maintain hope the palliative care practitioner would sometimes have to deceive the patient about the full nature or prospects of their condition by providing a &amp;lsquo;false hope&amp;rsquo;. This possibility creates an ethical tension in palliative practice, where the beneficent desire to improve patient welfare through sustaining hope appears to be in conflict with an autonomy-based requirement not to deceive patients about their condition. In order to resolve this ethical tension, we provide an analysis of the concept of hope and argue that there is at least ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192073</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192073</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Philosophical clinical ethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192072&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F36%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192072</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192072</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why I wrote ... Euthanasia, Ethics and the Law: From Conflict to Compromise</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192071&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F31%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192071</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192071</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Shock of the Human: how the media can change the way we think about ethical dilemmas in medicine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192070&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F26%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The relationship between the media and the medical profession is often one of mutual mistrust. However, the media, and especially television, is a powerful tool for telling individual stories and for providing a medium for medico-ethical dilemmas to be portrayed to a wide audience. The extent to which the use of individual narratives can or should influence public opinion about complex medical issues is examined in this paper from the perspective of a former television journalist with a postgraduate degree in medical law and ethics. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192070</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192070</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reasoning about physician-assisted suicide: analysis of comments by physicians and the Swedish general public</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192069&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F19%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Two questionnaires directed to Swedish physicians and a sample of the Swedish population investigated attitudes towards physician-assisted suicide (PAS). The aim of the present work was to analyse qualitative data from these questionnaires in order to explore how respondents reason about PAS. Data were analysed in two steps. First, we categorized different kinds of responses and identified pro and con arguments. Second, we identified general conclusions from the responses. The data reflect the differences in attitudes towards PAS among the public and physicians, with the former mainly in favour of PAS and the latter mainly against. There was, however, considerable agreement about what requirements must be met before PAS could be considered ethical. Many arguments against PAS concerned the ...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192069</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192069</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A response to 'Death and best interests'</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192068&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F15%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192068</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192068</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Doctrine of Double Effect and end-of-life decisions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192067&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F12%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192067</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192067</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee case 5: Should we discharge our vulnerable patient to a family who seem unable to look after her?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192066&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F6%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192066</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192066</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A missed opportunity to reform an outdated law</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192065&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F3%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192065</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192065</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tomorrow's doctors - the place of creativity</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192064&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F4%2F1%2F1%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192064</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192064</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why we wrote... Medicine, Patients and the Law</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985708&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F205%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985708</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985708</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A closer look at the Nuffield Council on Bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985707&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F199%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The Nuffield Council on Bioethics examines ethical issues raised by new developments in biology and medicine. Established by the Nuffield Foundation in 1991, the Council is an independent body, funded jointly by the Foundation, the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. Independence and quality are the underlining principles of the Council, and the way the Council works has been designed to ensure that its reports are thorough, authoritative and provide a novel, policy-oriented approach to difficult ethical dilemmas. Recent reports have considered the issues raised by public health and critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine. The Council is currently considering the ethical dilemmas surrounding dementia. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985707</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985707</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Through thick and thin: rationalizing the public bioethical debate over therapeutic cloning</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985706&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F194%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Beauchamp and Childress (1994) elaborated an approach to bioethical deliberations based on four universalistic principles. This framework of &amp;lsquo;principlism&amp;rsquo; has been criticized from within biomedical ethics as insufficient and problematic. However, this article considers a more radical sociological critique by John Evans (2002) that rejects the entire approach of defining &amp;lsquo;principles&amp;rsquo; a priori. This sociological critique is based on classical sociologist Max Weber's (1925) distinction between instrumental (&amp;lsquo;thin&amp;rsquo;) and substantive (&amp;lsquo;thick&amp;rsquo;) rationality. As an exploratory assessment of Evans' critique, his conceptualization of &amp;lsquo;thin&amp;rsquo; versus &amp;lsquo;thick&amp;rsquo; rationalization is applied to a large sample of Anglo-American press covera...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985706</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985706</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reproductive medicine and the concept of 'quality'</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985705&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F189%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Selection in reproductive medicine today relies on normative assessments of what &amp;lsquo;good life&amp;rsquo; consists of. This paper explores the terms under which such assessments are made by focusing on three particular concepts of &amp;lsquo;quality&amp;rsquo;: quality of life, biological quality and population quality. It is suggested that the apparently conflicting hypes, hopes and fears that surround reproductive medicine can co-circulate because of the different forms of normative assessment that these concepts allow. To ensure clarity in bioethical deliberations about selection, it is necessary to highlight how these differing forms of assessment are mobilized and invoked in practices of and debates about reproductive medicine. (Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985705</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985705</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>For analytic bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985704&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F185%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper argues that bioethics requires analysis, which is not explicitly ethical in character. The first part of the paper argues the general point, that ethical problems can arise not only on occasions when moral values make conflicting recommendations, but also in understanding the facts. I suggest that this is particularly so where the facts are provided by the biomedical sciences, since it is often not clear how to relate their conceptual framework to that in which we frame our value judgements. In the second part, I illustrate the argument by criticizing the moral conclusions drawn by the authors of a recent widely publicized study of paediatric obesity. There is a failure to translate properly these results into the language we use for moral evaluation. The case therefore illustra...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985704</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985704</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recall of participation in research projects in cancer genetics: some implications for research ethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985703&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F180%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The aim of this study is to assess patients' recall of their previous research participation. Recall was established during interviews and compared with entries from clinical notes. Participants were 49 patients who had previously participated in different types of research. Of the 49 patients, 45 (92%) interviewees recalled 69 of 109 (63%) study participations. Level of recall varied according to the type of research, some participants clearly recalled the details of research aims, giving consent and research procedures. Others recalled procedures (e.g. DNA testing) but were unclear about their purpose. There was no significant effect of time on recall. Some types of research participation (e.g. DNA testing) may be recalled as clinical care. We argue that such misunderstandings may have t...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985703</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985703</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in the Netherlands and the UK: a comparative study of the regulatory frameworks and outcomes for PGD</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985702&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F176%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Developments in biotechnology present difficult social and ethical challenges that need to be resolved by regulators among others. One crucial problem for regulators of new technologies is to ensure that regulation is both clear and sufficiently flexible to respond to new developments. This is particularly difficult to achieve in contentious fields such as medical biotechnology. In the European Union there is a divergence in the solutions to this problem which has lead to different regulatory frameworks for medical biotechnology. This paper compares and contrasts the British and Dutch regulatory frameworks for the selection of embryos by preimplantation genetic diagnosis as an example of the regulation of medical biotechnology. Some of the outcomes of the regulatory choices and possible re...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985702</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985702</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Death and best interests</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985701&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F171%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>I will consider how we can assess the interests of critically ill children who will survive only while aggressive medical support is continued. If aggressive medical support is withdrawn, the child will die shortly afterwards. This is important because when the courts are asked to decide treatments, the standard is that decisions should be made in the best interests of the child. My claim is that this is not a coherent way to consider how some children in this situation should be treated. I will consider two separate aspects of this problem. First, I will argue that there is no objective best interests test and no immediate prospect that we will be able to develop one. Secondly, I will argue that best interests are not a coherent way to consider the interests of children who will die short...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985701</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985701</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Co-payment for medical treatment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985700&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F168%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985700</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985700</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Ethics Committee case 4: our patient is (probably) competent but would not engage with us and wants us to decide for her</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985699&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F164%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985699</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985699</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Jack of all trades, master of none? Challenges facing junior academic researchers in bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985698&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F160%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985698</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985698</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Enhancing empathy across the NHS: a modest proposal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1985697&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F4%2F159%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1985697</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1985697</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why we wrote... Observing Bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1735240&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F3%2F155%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Clinical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1735240</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1735240</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Time for change: the need for a pragmatic approach to addressing organ shortage in the UK</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1735239&amp;cid=s_37241_74_f&amp;fid=37241&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fce.rsmjournals.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F3%2F3%2F149%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article sets out the key findings from the seminar series &amp;lsquo;Transplantation and organ deficit in the UK: Pragmatic solutions to ethical controversy&amp;rsquo; which ran from November 2006 to March 2008, and was sponsored by the Economic and Social Research Council. A broad range of issues were examined in the seminars, including religious and cultural attitudes affecting organ donation, the role of health-care professionals and what could be learned from the experiences of other countries, particularly in the European context. Core participants in the series came from a range of academic and practitioner backgrounds and had different ethical perspectives on issues affecting organ donation and transplantation. Notwithstanding such diversity, the findings set out in the article reflect...</description>
            <author>Clinical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1735239</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1735239</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

