<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Contact Dermatitis via MedWorm.com</title>
        <description>MedWorm.com provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest items from the 'Contact Dermatitis' source.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=Contact+Dermatitis&t=Contact+Dermatitis&s=Search&f=source]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:12:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Occupational risk factors for hand dermatitis among professional cleaners in Spain</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5625760&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.02023.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Professional cleaning workers may not be sufficiently protected from cutaneous disease at work. Future research should further investigate the roles of multiple product exposures and personal protective equipment. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5625760</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:24:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5625760</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by fructo oligosaccharide</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5579978&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01999.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5579978</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5579978</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A case of SDRIFE induced by Nuvaring®</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5579977&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01990.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5579977</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5579977</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Investigating contact allergy to CS spray</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5579976&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01989.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5579976</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5579976</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fixed drug eruption caused by etoricoxib with tolerance to celecoxib and parecoxib</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5579975&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01982.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5579975</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5579975</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Systemic contact dermatitis following oral exposure to tramadol in a patient with allergic contact dermatitis caused by buprenorphine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5579974&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01981.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5579974</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5579974</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Metal allergy and second‐generation metal‐on‐metal arthroplasties</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5579973&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01970.x</link>
            <description>There are concerns about the induction of metal allergy with second‐generation metal‐on‐metal prostheses, and the role that this may play in the development of complications such as ‘pseudotumours’ or failure of the implant. In this review, we attempt to set out the current knowledge on this subject. From a review of the literature, it is apparent that the first‐generation metal‐on‐metal replacement hips did cause metal sensitization, and that joint failure was associated with this, although it is still not clear which one led to the other. Highly engineered second‐generation metal‐on‐metal arthroplasties used in joint resurfacings are now increasingly employed. Several studies have recently shown an association between metal sensitization and peri‐implant hypersens...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5579973</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:18:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5579973</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cobalt release from implants and consumer items and characteristics of cobalt sensitized patients with dermatitis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5515310&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.02001.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. It is often difficult to interpret the relevance of a positive patch test reaction to cobalt, and there is a need for further studies to determine sources of cobalt exposure. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5515310</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 03:36:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5515310</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Corrigendum</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5495144&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.02003.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5495144</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5495144</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a skin‐lightening agent, 5,5′‐dipropylbiphenyl‐2,2′‐diol</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5495143&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01986.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5495143</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5495143</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Occupational contact urticaria caused by polyvinylchloride gloves</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5495142&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01985.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5495142</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5495142</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Positive patch test reaction to Lonicera japonica extract in a patient sensitized to formaldehyde</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5495141&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01984.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5495141</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5495141</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Case report: allergic contact cheilitis caused by ceresin wax</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5495140&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01983.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5495140</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5495140</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants – diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5495139&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01971.x</link>
            <description>Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to implanted metals are challenging to evaluate and treat. Although they are uncommon, they do exist, and require appropriate and complete evaluation. This review summarizes the evidence regarding evaluation tools, especially patch and lymphocyte transformation tests, for hypersensitivity reactions to implanted metal devices. Patch test evaluation is the gold standard for metal hypersensitivity, although the results may be subjective. Regarding pre‐implant testing, those patients with a reported history of metal dermatitis should be evaluated by patch testing. Those without a history of dermatitis should not be tested unless considerable concern exists. Regarding post‐implant testing, a subset of patients with metal hypersensitivity may...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5495139</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5495139</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The p‐value – a well‐understood and properly used statistical concept?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5495138&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.02002.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5495138</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:30:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5495138</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Non‐occupational contact sensitization to epoxy resin of bisphenol A among general dermatology patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5477891&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01993.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Non‐occupational sensitization sources account for approximately one‐third of epoxy resin sensitization cases, and therefore represent an important risk among hobbies and leisure activities. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5477891</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5477891</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by bis‐diglycerylpolyacyladipate‐2 (Softisan® 649) owing to its 12‐hydroxystearic acid content</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426716&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01994.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426716</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426716</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fragrances in topical over‐the‐counter medicaments – a loophole in EU legislation should be closed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426715&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01977.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426715</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426715</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can reliable information sources be trusted?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426714&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01974.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426714</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426714</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact urticaria caused by carvone in toothpaste</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426713&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01973.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426713</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426713</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Widespread contact dermatitis caused by urushiol in kintsugi</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426712&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01972.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426712</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426712</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by sodium dehydroacetate, not hyaluronic acid, in Ialuset® cream</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426711&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01958.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426711</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426711</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Excessive nickel release from mobile phones—a persistent cause of nickel allergy and dermatitis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426710&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01988.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Apparently, the proportion of mobile phones with significant nickel release remains unchanged, despite the 2009 revision of the EU Nickel Directive. We encourage manufacturers to measure nickel release from metallic components used in the assembly of mobile phones to ensure safe products. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426710</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426710</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h‐CLAT)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426709&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01952.x</link>
            <description>This study was conducted to investigate the predictive performance of the h‐CLAT for human skin sensitizing potential.Materials/Methods. We selected a total of 66 test chemicals with known human sensitizing potential, and tested all chemicals with the h‐CLAT. We then evaluated the performance of the h‐CLAT in predicting human sensitizing potential.Results and conclusion. Forty‐five of 51 tested sensitizers were positive in the h‐CLAT, indicating relatively high sensitivity. Also, 10 of 15 non‐sensitizers were correctly detected as negative. The overall agreement between human data and h‐CLAT outcome was 83%. Furthermore, the h‐CLAT could accurately predict the human sensitizing potential of 23 tested chemicals that were amines, heterocyclic compounds, or sulfur compounds. O...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426709</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426709</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426708&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01945.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Our findings suggest that mixtures of allergens increase the primary response that potentiates the generation of memory T cells in response to the specific allergen. Thus, allergen mixtures enhance both induction and elicitation of contact allergy. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426708</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426708</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hand eczema among Hong Kong nurses: a self‐report questionnaire survey conducted in a regional hospital</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426707&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01961.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Hand eczema is common and severe among Hong Kong nurses. The results of this study suggest that hand eczema is an important problem for nurses and that preventive measures should be emphasized. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426707</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426707</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The ‘overall yield’ with the baseline series – a useful addition to the array of MOAHLFA factors describing departmental characteristics of patch tested patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426706&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01964.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The ‘P’ measure should prove useful as another perspective on departmental characteristics, and should be reported along with established variables (MOAHLFA index). (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426706</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426706</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dermatitis in patients undergoing the Nuss procedure for correction of pectus excavatum</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426705&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01966.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Despite clinical evidence of cutaneous reactions or putative allergy, no patient required early removal of the bar(s). Cutaneous testing with stainless steel discs supplied by the bar manufacturer does not provide accurate screening for allergy to the implant used in the Nuss procedure. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426705</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426705</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Trend of contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients in Thais over a period of 10 years*</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426704&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01978.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Our study showed that ammoniated mercury is an emerging cosmetic allergen, showing an increased prevalence in recent years in Thailand. A focus is required on emerging cosmetic allergens and what may account for the upward trend of cosmetic contact dermatitis. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426704</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426704</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Do hairdressers in Denmark have their hand eczema reported as an occupational disease? Results from a register‐based questionnaire study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426699&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01997.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Hand eczema is considerably under‐reported as an occupational disease; the perception of hand eczema among hairdressers and the lack of reporting from doctors are the main reasons for this. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426699</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:54:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426699</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>p‐Phenylenediamine and other hair dye sensitizers in Spain</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426702&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01979.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Hair dye substances categorized as potent skin sensitizers were used in all studied hair dye products on the Spanish market. The prevalence of p‐phenylenediamine was higher in the present study than in a similar study in Sweden. More than 20 potent sensitizers were identified in each country. Not only p‐phenylenediamine should be used to diagnose allergy to hair dyes. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426702</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426702</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dermal uptake study with 4,4′‐diphenylmethane diisocyanate led to active sensitization</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426701&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01995.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. A dermal uptake study with 4,4′‐MDI in 2.0% pet. with an occlusion time of 8 hr induced active sensitization to 4,4′‐MDI and subsequently to 4,4′‐MDA. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426701</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426701</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic complications from orthopaedic joint implants: the role of delayed hypersensitivity to benzoyl peroxide in bone cement</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426700&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01996.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Components of bone cement, such as benzoyl peroxide, may rarely cause allergic complications. However, because of the irritant potential of these substances, careful performance, reading and interpretation of the patch tests is required. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426700</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426700</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>First results from the multicentre study Rehabilitation of Occupational Skin Diseases – Optimization and Quality Assurance of Inpatient Management (ROQ)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5426703&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01991.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The primary objectives of TIP (return to work, improvement of OSD, enhancement of quality of life, and reduction in the use of topical steroids) were successfully met. The long‐term follow‐up (1 and 3 years after TIP) will examine whether these favourable outcomes can be sustained. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5426703</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5426703</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by iodophor‐impregnated surgical incise drape</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316286&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01965.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316286</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:43:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316286</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nickel in a green eye pencil</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316285&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01960.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316285</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:43:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316285</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Provocation test with metallic palladium in a palladium‐allergic patient</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316284&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01959.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316284</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:42:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316284</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Octyldodecyl xyloside: a novel contact allergen</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316283&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01951.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316283</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:42:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316283</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Efficacy of oral hyposensitization in allergic contact dermatitis caused by nickel</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316282&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01940.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Our study suggested therapeutic efficacy of oral hyposensitization in allergic individuals. Placebo‐controlled studies are required to confirm the results and determine the optimal therapeutic regimen for prolonged beneficial effects. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316282</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:42:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316282</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Non‐fragrance allergens in specific cosmetic products</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316281&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01968.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. This study provides information on the presence and frequency of allergens in specific causal cosmetic products. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316281</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:41:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316281</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316280&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01962.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Sensitization to the 26 individual fragrance ingredients was identified in 7.6% of the subjects patch tested. Most reactions were of clinical relevance. Fragrance‐allergic subjects would be missed if testing with the individual fragrance ingredients was not performed. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316280</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:41:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316280</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The EU Clinical Trials Directive Jeopardises Consumer and Occupational Safety</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5316279&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01998.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5316279</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:41:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5316279</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Long‐term effectiveness of secondary prevention in geriatric nurses with occupational hand eczema: the challenge of a controlled study design</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5301658&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01976.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The results indicate long‐term effects regarding job continuation and disease severity, although few results showed statistical significance. It is outlined that controlled long‐term studies aiming at proving the general effectiveness of secondary prevention are no longer feasible in Germany, as the statutory accident insurance has led to a legal entitlement of all patients affected by occupational hand eczema to immediate preventive intervention. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5301658</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5301658</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Immediate and delayed allergic hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: practical guidelines</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5301657&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01967.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Practical information to the medical profession in order to detect and manage such reactions is provided. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5301657</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5301657</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Analysis of patch test referrals: influence of appropriateness of referrals on sensitization rate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5301656&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01987.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Clinical experience was seen to be crucial for the appropriate selection of patients. Furthermore, appropriate referral for patch testing was shown to influence the sensitization rate. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5301656</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5301656</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Quantification of p‐phenylenediamine and 2‐hydroxy‐1,4‐naphthoquinone in henna tattoos</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5301655&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01992.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Products purporting to be henna, but that in fact contain no henna, are being offered. Moreover, these products may contain PPD, which is associated with health risks, especially severe allergic reactions. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5301655</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5301655</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Exposure to wet work in working Australians</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5266531&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01975.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Specific groups of workers reported high levels of exposure to wet work. There were differences between the profiles of workers reporting frequent hand‐washing and workers reporting increased duration of exposure to hands immersed in liquids. We also found a high correlation between wet work and chemical exposure. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5266531</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:00:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5266531</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On the lookout for precursor lesions: where does dry skin end and slight hand eczema begin?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5249578&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01969.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Erythema, lichenification, and crusting, indicating constant skin ‘strain’, can be regarded as precursor lesions for slight hand eczema, and should be monitored quantitatively. As other occupations, for example hairdressing, have different predilection sites, it can be concluded that the pattern of occupational hand eczema is strongly influenced by the distinct strain profile of an occupation. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5249578</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:44:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5249578</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Corrigendum</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221181&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01980.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221181</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221181</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A case of occupational allergic contact dermatitis in a plumber performing pipeline repair</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221180&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01956.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221180</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221180</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by chromium in a mobile phone</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221179&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01955.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221179</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221179</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Facial leucoderma following eczema: a new case induced by spectacle frames</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221178&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01954.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221178</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221178</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Occupational allergic contact dermatitis of the ears caused by thiurams in a headset</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221177&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01950.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221177</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221177</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ascaridole, a sensitizing component of tea tree oil, patch tested at 1% and 5% in two series of patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221176&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01948.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221176</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221176</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Airborne contact dermatitis to triclosan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221175&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01934.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221175</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221175</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Extreme patch test reactivity to p‐phenylenediamine but not to other allergens in children</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221174&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01930.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The high proportion of extreme patch test reactions to PPD, but not to other important allergens, in children reflects intense sensitization, probably because of a high induction dose from PPD‐containing ‘henna tattoos'. In children with a history of contact allergy to ‘henna tattoos' or hair dyes, the standard patch test concentration of PPD 1% should be drastically reduced. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221174</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221174</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patch testing in children with hand eczema. A 5‐year multicentre study in Spain</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221173&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01943.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Allergic contact dermatitis was the most usual diagnosis in our series of children with hand eczema. We recommend patch testing of all children with chronic hand eczema, as is already performed in adults. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221173</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221173</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221172&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01900.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. We have shown that patch testing can identify relevant allergens in 44% of children with eczema. The commonest relevant allergens were medicament allergens, plant allergens, house dust mite, nickel, Amerchol® L101, and 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol. Patch testing can be performed in children as young as 2 years with the proper preparation. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221172</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221172</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Value of patch tests in clindamycin‐related drug eruptions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221171&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01942.x</link>
            <description>Discussion. We considered the positive patch tests results with clindamycin, in the 9 patients with maculopapular exantema, to be specific, versus the negative results observed in the control group. Although the sensitivity is low (30%), they confirmed the responsibility of this antibiotic in cutaneous adverse drug reactions in which, with only chronological criteria, it was not possible to conclude on the culprit drug. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221171</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221171</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patch testing in fixed drug eruptions–a 20‐year review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5221170&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01946.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Patch testing was shown to be a simple and safe method to confirm drug imputabililty in fixed drug eruption, mainly when NSAID or multiple drugs are suspected. Persistent lack of reactivity to drug classes such as antibiotics and allopurinol represent an important limitation. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5221170</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:16:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5221170</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children – a review of current data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5142504&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01963.x</link>
            <description>Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in children was previously considered to be a rare occurrence. However, the growing number of case reports and cross‐sectional studies through the past three decades indicate that ACD is, in fact, a highly relevant diagnosis in children. Furthermore, the frequency of ACD in children seems to be increasing. In 1999, a review of the literature reported prevalence rates of 14.5–70% in selected paediatric populations. The current paper reviews the studies on the prevalence of positive patch test reactions and ACD in the paediatric population during the past decade, and provides an overview of the main findings. We found reported sensitization rates of 26.6–95.6% in selected groups of children. The associated relevance was 51.7–100%. The most common all...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5142504</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:43:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5142504</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylphenidate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108355&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01949.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108355</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108355</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Acute bullous irritant contact dermatitis caused by EMLA® cream</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108354&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01944.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108354</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108354</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multiple contact allergies to benzophenones</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108353&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01941.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108353</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108353</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Two cases of airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone in paint</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108352&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01924.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108352</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108352</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by tetracaine contained in otic drops</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108351&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01890.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108351</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108351</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact allergy in the cleaning industry: analysis of contact allergy surveillance data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108350&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01937.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Formaldehyde and rubber additives such as thiurams, zinc diethyldithiocarbamate and mercaptobenzothiazole are occupationally relevant allergens in female cleaners. Prevention strategies are needed to address the problem. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108350</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108350</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hand eczema in hairdressers: a Danish register‐based study of the prevalence of hand eczema and its career consequences</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108349&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01935.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Hairdressers work an average of 8.4 years in the profession before leaving it, and hand eczema contributes significantly to this career change. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108349</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108349</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact allergy and human biomonitoring – an overview with a focus on metals</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5108348&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01933.x</link>
            <description>Humans are widely exposed to chemicals. Today, there is an increased acknowledgement of the importance of measuring human and environmental exposures to man‐made or refined chemicals. Different approaches have been applied over time, but during the past 25 years, there has been a general trend towards the use of human biomonitoring. A few studies have used human biomonitoring methodology to track contact allergens together with information on patch test reactivity. Hypothetically, the internal load of reactive chemicals might modify the immune response to haptens and the propensity to sensitize and elicit allergic contact dermatitis or develop tolerance. This review offers a general overview of human biomonitoring, including information about its typical application and methodology. Furt...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5108348</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:30:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5108348</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation – evaluation of a public health intervention</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5065076&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01957.x</link>
            <description>In conclusion, the Danish nickel regulation and the EU Nickel Directive have changed the epidemiology of nickel allergy in Denmark. However, the Nickel Directive and its reference methods need to be revised to better protect consumers and dermatitis patients.Resumé (Danish)I løbet af det 20. århundrede blev nikkel i tiltagende grad anvendt i billige forbrugerprodukter såsom bæltespænder, smykker, ure, knapper og lynlåse da metallet var billigt, gav en pæn og skinnende overflade og kun i ringe grad rustede. Ved længerevarende hudkontakt frigav mange af disse metalgenstande nikkelioner i koncentrationer der medførte nikkelallergi og eksem. Industrialisering gjorde således vestlige forbrugere rigere, men samtidig med de ændrede forbrugsvaner, førte den til en stigende forekomst a...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5065076</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:08:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5065076</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patch testing with formaldehyde and formaldehyde‐releasers: multicentre study in Spain (2005–2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5065075&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01953.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The inclusion of imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea in the baseline series of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group (GEIDAC) should enable better classification of patients allergic to formaldehyde, and could aid in their management. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5065075</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5065075</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Summary of shoe allergic contact dermatitis caused by dimethyl fumarate in Spain</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012057&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01925.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012057</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012057</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact sensitization to quaternium‐15 acting as a warning sign for curare allergy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012056&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01923.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012056</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012056</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Occupational contact allergy to omeprazole and fluoxetine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012055&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01931.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012055</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012055</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Action spectrum for etofenamate photoallergic contact dermatitis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012054&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01920.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012054</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012054</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nickel on the Dutch market: 10 years after entry into force of the EU Nickel Directive</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012053&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01919.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012053</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012053</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sensory irritation caused by two organic solvents–short‐time single application and repeated occlusive test in stingers and non‐stingers</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012052&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01938.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate a potential connection between the responsiveness to the sensory irritation caused by lipophilic irritants and lactic acid. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012052</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012052</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isopropyl alcohol: a missed allergen?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012051&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01936.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. We report here the first large case series of contact allergy to isopropyl alcohol, which demonstrates that sensitization to this substance might not be as uncommon as previously thought. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012051</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012051</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Historical perspective on the use of visual grading scales in evaluating skin irritation and sensitization</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012050&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01912.x</link>
            <description>This article reviews the history of visual grading scales, and the results of investigations into the reliability of the method. Some examples are provided to illustrate the diverse array of protocols that use visual scoring to evaluate skin irritation. Furthermore, as bioengineering methods are developed that can quantitate certain aspects of skin irritant and sensitization reactions, it is important to consider whether such measures should supplement or replace visual assessment. Examples of investigations comparing the outcomes of studies that use visual scoring and those that use bioengineering methods are discussed. These examples provide little evidence that bioengineering measures provide an improvement in overall quality in comparison with current testing methods that rely on visua...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012050</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012050</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Black tattoo inks are a source of problematic substances such as dibutyl phthalate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012047&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01947.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion The sensitizing agent dibutyl phthalate acts directly on keratinocytes and can drive Th2 responses following skin exposure via induction of thymic stromal lymphopoietin gene expression. Hexachloro‐1,3‐butadiene is genotoxic in vitro and 9‐fluorenone is cytotoxic, generating reactive oxygen species under light exposure. The substances found in the inks might be partially responsible for adverse skin reactions to tattoos. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012047</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:30:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012047</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Disease severity and quality of life in a follow‐up study of patients with occupational contact dermatitis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012048&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01896.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions QoL was generally reduced in this group of patients with occupational contact dermatitis, with some correlation between severity and DLQI. The DLQI was a more sensitive measurement of QoL than the SF‐36 in this patient population. Incorporating disease severity rating with a QoL questionnaire is valuable in occupational contact dermatitis and is recommended. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012048</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012048</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lack of effect of ustekinumab in treatment of allergic contact dermatitis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5012049&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01907.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Our observation suggests that, although theoretically plausible, Ustekinumab does not seem to be a valuable therapeutic approach for chronic allergic contact dermatitis. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5012049</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5012049</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Risk of sensitization to preservatives estimated on the basis of patch test data and exposure, according to a sample of 3541 leave‐on products</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4969073&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01939.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. High frequencies of sensitization may be put into perspective by the frequent use of certain preservatives. Despite infrequent use, others (with higher potencies or too high use concentrations) may turn out to be associated with an increased risk. Hazard assessment should be supplemented by risk assessment. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4969073</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:31:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4969073</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Palladium allergy prevalence might be underestimated because of an inadequate test allergen</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922296&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01929.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922296</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922296</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Palladium allergy prevalence is underestimated because of an inadequate test allergen</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922295&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01926.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922295</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922295</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Revision of the European standard for control of the EU nickel restriction – a probable improvement for European citizens</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922294&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01928.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922294</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922294</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Interconversion between local lymph node assay EC3 units</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922293&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01913.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922293</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922293</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bullous allergic contact dermatitis caused by Critonia aromatisans</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922292&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01918.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922292</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922292</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A case of wheat‐dependent exercise‐induced anaphylaxis sensitized with hydrolysed wheat protein in a soap</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922291&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01917.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922291</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922291</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis in a nurse caused by airborne rubber additives</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922290&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01914.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922290</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922290</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical work‐up of a highly reactive nickel‐allergic patient</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922289&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01910.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922289</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922289</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact dermatitis caused by chlorothalonil on imported roses: irritant or allergic reaction?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922288&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01903.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922288</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922288</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by Tinosorb® M</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922287&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01894.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922287</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922287</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Acrylates tooth and nail: coexistent allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates present in desensitizing dental swabs and artificial fingernails</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922286&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01867.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922286</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922286</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A new entity: the neutrophilic fixed food eruption</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922285&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01845.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922285</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922285</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fixed drug eruption caused by iodinated contrast media</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922284&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01816.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922284</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922284</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Textile allergy – the Melbourne experience</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922283&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01861.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Textile allergy is not uncommon. In Melbourne, Basic Red 46 in inexpensive, dark‐coloured, acrylic‐blend, men's work socks is the most important cause. It is important to test with samples of patients' clothing. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922283</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922283</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multicentre patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922282&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01921.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The contact allergy frequency in the tested population (1.1%) merits its inclusion in the Swedish baseline series and possibly also in other baseline series. Simultaneous allergic reactions were noted to colophonium, M. pereirae, and fragrance mix I. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922282</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922282</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A retrospective study of patch tests in Chongqing, China from 2004 to 2009</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922281&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01854.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Contact allergy in southwest China has particular characteristics, and these findings should be helpful in the development of strategies to reduce contact allergy in this geographical region. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922281</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922281</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Classification of hand eczema: clinical and aetiological types. Based on the guideline of the Danish Contact Dermatitis Group</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922280&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01911.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The relationship between clinical type of hand eczema and aetiological diagnosis fitted with general experience, but no simple relationship was found. This emphasizes that patch testing and exposure analysis are mandatory. Hyperkeratotic palmar hand eczema was identified as a distinct clinical subtype. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922280</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922280</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hand eczema guidelines based on the Danish guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hand eczema</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922279&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01915.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Operational guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hand eczema are described. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922279</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922279</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nomenclature of metal allergens in contact dermatitis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922278&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01927.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922278</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922278</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The risk for cross‐reactions after a cutaneous delayed‐type hypersensitivity reaction to heparin preparations is independent of their molecular weight: a systematic review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4922277&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01932.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The available data demonstrated the lowest overall risk for cross‐reactions for pentosan polysulfate (36.4%) and fondaparinux (10.4%). In the clinical context, fondaparinux is recommended as the current best alternative when a DTH reaction occurs. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4922277</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:45:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4922277</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Time trends of contact allergy to a modified European baseline series in Beijing between 2001 and 2006</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4876329&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01897.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. High sensitivity rates were observed in the study. Significant increasing trends in sensitivity rates for 10 allergens, probably reflecting increasing changes in exposure, were found. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4876329</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 13:45:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4876329</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patch tests with beryllium salts</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823459&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01906.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823459</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823459</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Danger from the workplace: allergic contact dermatitis from the first exposure to isothiazolinones</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823458&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01905.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823458</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823458</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by diethylthiourea in a neoprene handle of a cleaning trolley</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823457&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01904.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823457</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823457</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bis‐diglycerylpolyacyladipate‐2: An emergent allergen in cosmetics?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823456&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01902.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823456</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823456</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2,2′‐azobis(2‐methylpropion‐amidine) dihydrochloride used in the manufacture of acrylic polymers</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823455&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01892.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823455</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823455</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by Solvent Orange 60 dye</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823454&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01871.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823454</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823454</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact dermatitis caused by C30–38 olefin/isopropyl maleate/MA copolymer in a sunscreen</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823453&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01868.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823453</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823453</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical and experimental studies of octocrylene's allergenic potency</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823452&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01899.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The clinical studies show that octocrylene is both a photocontact allergen and a contact allergen. Octocrylene's ability to cause contact allergy is probably attributable to its reactivity towards lysine. To be able to understand why octocrylene causes photocontact allergy, further studies are needed. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823452</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:01:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823452</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Methylisothiazolinone contact allergy and dose–response relationships</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823451&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01901.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. A maximum of 100 ppm MI is permitted in cosmetic products. Eighteen per cent of MI‐allergic patients reacted to a concentration 20 times lower in a ROAT. The amounts used in cosmetics should be reduced, and the development of MI contact allergy should be monitored closely. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823451</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:00:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823451</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patch, prick or intradermal tests to detect delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823450&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01888.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Patch testing with the active principles diluted in ethanol remains the diagnostic method of choice for the detection of delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids. Intradermal tests with late readings, despite detecting additional contact allergy cases, should not be routinely performed, because of an important risk of atrophy, particularly with corticosteroid suspensions. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823450</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:00:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823450</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>C16‐methyl corticosteroids are far less allergenic than the non‐methylated molecules</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823449&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01874.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. C16‐methyl substitution, interfering with protein binding, and halogenation, seem to reduce the allergenicity of corticosteroid molecules. Hence, when indicated, C16‐methylated corticosteroids should be preferentially prescribed. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823449</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:00:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823449</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Correlation between lesion site and concentration of dimethyl fumarate in different parts of shoes in patients with contact dermatitis caused by dimethyl fumarate in footwear</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823446&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01922.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. A correlation exists between the concentrations of DMF in the different parts of the shoe and the localization of the lesions. Although DMF is a volatile substance, it can remain impregnated in shoes for a long period of time. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823446</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 01:00:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823446</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Validation of self‐reporting of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823448&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01908.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. We found good agreement between self‐reporting of hand eczema and clinical examination. There was good sensitivity and high specificity. Self‐reporting of hand eczema among hairdressing apprentices is considered to be a valid method for estimating the prevalence of hand eczema, although it might underestimate the true prevalence. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823448</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823448</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patch testing with hydroxyethyl‐p‐phenylenediamine sulfate – cross‐reactivity with p‐phenylenediamine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4823447&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01916.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. HPPS may be an alternative hair dye for individuals not tolerating PPD‐containing dyes. However, cross‐reactivity with PPD and other aromatic amines may occur. HPPS is also a known sensitizer, and the risk of de novo sensitization can only be assessed by a controlled study on a large panel and under regular use conditions. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4823447</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4823447</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can exposure limitations for well‐known contact allergens be simplified? An analysis of dose–response patch test data</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4768547&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01876.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. We found a rather small variation in the ED10 patch test between the allergens, and no clear relationship between induction potency and elicitation threshold of a range of allergens. This knowledge may stimulate thoughts on introducing a generic approach for limitations in exposure to well‐known allergens. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4768547</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4768547</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Corrigendum</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718592&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01909.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718592</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718592</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact cheilitis caused by ditrimethylolpropane triethylhexanoate in a lipstick</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718588&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01872.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718588</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718588</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by azithromycin in an eye drop</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718586&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01869.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718586</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718586</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A case of IgE‐mediated allergy and cell‐mediated allergy to Seaprose‐S in the same patient</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718584&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01891.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718584</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718584</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone in a deodorant</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718581&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01885.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718581</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718581</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Occupational contact urticaria caused by didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718579&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01882.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718579</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718579</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cutaneous adverse drug reactions caused by delayed sensitization to carboxymethylcellulose</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718576&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01881.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718576</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718576</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A rare case of acquired leukoderma following patch testing with an acrylate series</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718574&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01879.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718574</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718574</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by dihydroxyacetone – optimal concentration and vehicle for patch testing</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718572&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01870.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718572</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718572</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nickel allergy in Spain needs active intervention</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718570&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01865.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718570</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718570</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Post‐implantation erythema in 3 patients and a review of reticular telangiectatic erythema</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718568&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01887.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Owing to the delayed onset and variable recovery, RTE remains a diagnostic challenge. RTE should be included in the differential diagnosis of any patient presenting with erythema over the site of a previously implanted device. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718568</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718568</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants: a prospective study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718566&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01886.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Given the discrepancies between the information obtained while taking patient histories and test results, preoperative history‐taking alone appears to be insufficient for identifying patients with metal sensitivity. Moreover, the increase in the percentage of patients who tested positive for metal sensitivity 1 year post‐implantation suggests the possibility of prosthesis‐induced sensitization. Therefore, objective determination of metal sensitivity at preoperative assessment should be considered in planning arthroplasty intervention, as it would help the surgeon in selecting the most appropriate prosthesis for the patient and could benefit implant performance. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718566</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718566</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Deodorants are the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance ingredients*</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718563&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01889.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion. Deodorants were the leading causes of fragrance allergy, especially among men. Seemingly, deodorants have an ‘unhealthy’ composition of the fragrance chemicals present in FM II. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718563</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718563</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergens responsible for allergic contact dermatitis among children: a systematic review and meta‐analysis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718561&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01860.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. This meta‐analysis offers guidance on which allergens are most prevalent in the paediatric population and should have priority for inclusion in standardized allergen series. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718561</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718561</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Prevalence of and factors influencing sensitization to corticosteroids in a Danish patch test population</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4718559&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01898.x</link>
            <description>Discussion/conclusion. Chronic dermatoses (atopic dermatitis and leg dermatitis) were identified as risk factors for group A corticosteroid allergy, probably because of more pronounced exposure to group A steroids resulting from ease of access that is exploited by patients with a chronic dermatosis. The duration of disease rather than the dermatosis itself seemed to be important for group B and D2 corticosteroid allergy. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4718559</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:45:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4718559</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by an ethinylestradiol–norelgestromin transdermal therapeutic system</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604077&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01880.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604077</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604077</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by ascorbyl tetraisopalmitate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604076&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01875.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604076</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604076</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergy to oxidized linalool in the UK</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604075&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01873.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604075</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604075</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cobalt release from inexpensive earrings from Thailand and China</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604074&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01866.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604074</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604074</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by Salvia officinalis extract</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604073&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01848.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604073</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604073</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EMA revokes marketing authorization for bufexamac</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604072&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01883.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604072</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604072</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Prevalence of cutaneous reactions to the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) in an adult population</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604071&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01884.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions.These findings show that PPM cutaneous reactions are common in this southern European population, including peripheral urban areas, and that the main risk is related to exposure to this insect. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604071</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604071</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fragrance allergens in ‘specific’ cosmetic products</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604070&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01877.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions.This study not only underlines the usefulness of fragrance‐ingredient labelling in order to identify the causal allergen(s) present in specific cosmetic products, but may also provide information on trends in the actual use of sensitizing fragrance ingredients in them. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604070</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604070</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is cocamidopropyl betaine a contact allergen? Analysis of network data and short review of the literature</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604069&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01863.x</link>
            <description>Conclusion.The vast majority of positive reactions to CAPB are presumably false positive. Allergic reactions are very rare. This would support the notion of CAPB being ‘not a significant skin sensitizer’, in line with current classification systems. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604069</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604069</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Late reactions to patch test preparations with reduced concentrations of p‐phenylenediamine: a multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604068&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01855.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions.The occurrence of late reactions to PPD may be influenced by patch test concentration and duration. PPD 0.4–0.5% pet. may cause late reactions indicative of active sensitization. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604068</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604068</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Metal allergen of the 21st century—a review on exposure, epidemiology and clinical manifestations of palladium allergy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4604067&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2011.01878.x</link>
            <description>Consumers are mainly exposed to palladium from jewellery and dental restorations. Palladium contact allergy is nearly always seen together with nickel allergy, as palladium and nickel tend to cross‐react. We aimed to analyse the available palladium patch test data and case reports to determine whether the prevalence of palladium mono‐sensitization has increased. Based on available patch test data from the period 1986–2008, a total of 10 778 patients were patch tested with palladium chloride. The median prevalence of palladium allergy was 7.8% (range &amp;lt;1.0–19.0%) in dermatitis patients and 7.4% (range 1.3–13.9%) in dental patients. The median prevalence of palladium mono‐sensitization (defined as the presence of palladium allergy and the absence of nickel allergy) was 0.2% (ra...</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4604067</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:15:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4604067</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The different decomposition properties of diazolidinyl urea in cosmetics and patch test materials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4483828&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01862.x</link>
            <description>Conclusions. The diazolidinyl urea‐derived decomposition products differed between the cosmetics and patch test preparations. To test the contact sensitivity of the diazolidinyl urea present in cosmetics, patch tests with HU and 3,4‐BHU in petrolatum should be performed. (Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4483828</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:30:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4483828</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allergic contact dermatitis caused by benzophenone‐4 in a printer</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4416073&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01864.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4416073</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:15:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4416073</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Photodermatitis caused by oral ketoprofen: two case reports</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4416072&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01817.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4416072</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:15:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4416072</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Occupational erythema multiforme‐like contact reaction to iodoacetonitrile in a chemistry student</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4416071&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01853.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4416071</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:15:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4416071</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Anaphylactic reactions following Kenacort‐A® injection: carboxymethylcellulose is involved once again</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4416070&amp;cid=s_31738_12_f&amp;fid=31738&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1600-0536.2010.01850.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Contact Dermatitis)</description>
            <author>Contact Dermatitis</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4416070</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:15:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4416070</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

