<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry via MedWorm.com</title>
        <description>MedWorm.com provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest items from the 'Journal of Bioethical Inquiry' source.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=Journal+of+Bioethical+Inquiry&t=Journal+of+Bioethical+Inquiry&s=Search&f=source]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:10:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Sale of Sperm, Health Records, Minimally Conscious States, and Duties of Candour</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5624988&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fvj681716770x31vk%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Recent DevelopmentsPages 1-8DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9347-6Authors
		Cameron Stewart, Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2006Bernadette Richards, Law School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia 5005Richard Huxtable, Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH UKBill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaTina Cockburn, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5624988</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:53:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5624988</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rethinking the Body and Its Boundaries</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5576930&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fg0750566h678532n%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory EditorialPages 1-6DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9353-8Authors
		Leigh E. Rich, Department of Health Sciences (Public Health), Armstrong Atlantic State University, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USAMichael A. Ashby, Palliative Care and Persistent Pain Services, Royal Hobart, Hospital, Southern Tasmania Area Health Service, and School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, 1st Floor, Peacock Building, Repatriation Centre, 90 Davey Street, Hobart, TAS 7000 AustraliaPierre-Olivier Méthot, ESRC Centre for Genomics in Society (Egenis), University of Exeter, Byrne House, St German’s Road, Exeter, EX4 4PJ UK
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical In...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5576930</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:45:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5576930</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism and the Potential Adverse Effects for Boys and Girls with Autism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5569186&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F2p1l35376262727k%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Autism, typically described as a spectrum neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impairments in verbal ability and social
 reciprocity as well as obsessive or repetitious behaviours, is currently thought to markedly affect more males than females.
 Not surprisingly, this encourages a gendered understanding of the Autism Spectrum. Simon Baron-Cohen, a prominent authority
 in the field of autism research, characterizes the male brain type as biased toward systemizing. In contrast, the female brain
 type is understood to be biased toward empathizing. Since persons with autism are characterized as hyper-systemizers and hypo-empathizers,
 Baron-Cohen suggests that, whether they are male or female, most possess an “extreme male brain profile.” We argue that Baron-Co...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5569186</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:03:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5569186</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Donating Embryos to Stem Cell Research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5569187&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fg984r3r4721p8376%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This paper is based on linked qualitative studies of the donation of human embryos to stem cell research carried out in the
 United Kingdom, Switzerland, and China. All three studies used semi-structured interview protocols to allow an in-depth examination
 of donors’ and non-donors’ rationales for their donation decisions, with the aim of gaining information on contextual and
 other factors that play a role in donor decisions and identifying how these relate to factors that are more usually included
 in evaluations made by theoretical ethics. Our findings have implications for one factor that has previously been suggested
 as being of ethical concern: the role of gratitude. Our empirical work shows no evidence that interpersonal gratitude is an
 important factor, b...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5569187</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 06:48:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5569187</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Good Mothering” or “Good Citizenship”?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5556880&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fc05t578g602523jx%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Umbilical cord blood banking is one of many biomedical innovations that confront pregnant women with new choices about what
 they should do to secure their own and their child’s best interests. Many mothers can now choose to donate their baby’s umbilical
 cord blood (UCB) to a public cord blood bank or pay to store it in a private cord blood bank. Donation to a public bank is
 widely regarded as an altruistic act of civic responsibility. Paying to store UCB may be regarded as a “unique opportunity”
 to provide “insurance” for the child’s future. This paper reports findings from a survey of Australian women that investigated
 the decision to either donate or store UCB. We conclude that mothers are faced with competing discourses that force them to
 choose b...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5556880</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:45:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5556880</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Psychiatric Ethics and a Politics of Compassion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542378&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fmwk3j55671710636%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Australia has one of the harshest regimes for the processing of asylum seekers, people who have applied for refugee status
 but are still awaiting an answer. It has received sharp rebuke for its policies from international human rights bodies but
 continues to exercise its resolve to protect its borders from those seeking protection. One means of doing so is the detention
 of asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat. Health care providers who care for asylum seekers in these conditions experience
 a conflict of “dual loyalty,” whereby their role in preserving and maintaining the health of patients can run counter to their
 employment in detention facilities. Many psychiatrists who have worked in the detention setting engage in forms of political
 activism in o...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542378</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:55:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542378</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Regulating Consent to Organ and Embryo Donation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542379&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F515030lx64107265%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;As rational adults, we are free to elect what is (or is not) done to our bodies. However, this strong freedom does not extend
 to the borders of life. Control over the uses of our biological material is constrained and uncertain at law. Our article
 examines the legal condition of embryos and organs: how law conceptualises them and regulates their uses.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleCategory SymposiumPages 1-7DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9348-5Authors
		Ngaire Naffine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaBernadette Richards, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542379</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:55:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542379</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Informed Consent and Fresh Egg Donation for Stem Cell Research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542380&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fk57n357344075210%2F</link>
            <description>This article develops a model of informed consent for fresh oöcyte donation for stem cell research, during in vitro fertilisation
 (IVF), by building on the importance of patients’ embodied experience. Informed consent typically focuses on the disclosure
 of material information. Yet this approach does not incorporate the embodied knowledge that patients acquire through lived
 experience. Drawing on interview data from 35 patients and health professionals in an IVF clinic in Australia, our study demonstrates
 the uncertainty of IVF treatment, and the tendency for patients to overestimate their chances of success prior to the experience
 of treatment. Once in active treatment, however, patients identify their oöcytes as both precious and precarious. We argue
 that it is necessary to for...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542380</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:49:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542380</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Donation of Stem Cells and Reproductive Tissue</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542381&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fu7187g8knq8tm2t6%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory SymposiumPages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9351-xAuthors
		Catherine Waldby, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaIan Kerridge, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Medical Foundation Building (K25), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaLoane Skene, Faculty of Law and Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Studies, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VA, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542381</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:50:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542381</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical Challenges in End-of-Life Care for GLBTI Individuals</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542382&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F77w208h85254724l%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Case StudiesPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9345-8Authors
		Colleen Cartwright, ASLaRC Aged Services Unit, Southern Cross University, Brett St., Tweed Heads, NSW 2485, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542382</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:06:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542382</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Castration Anxiety</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5542383&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fw12202vp31141182%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Chemical castration laws, such as one recently adopted in the U.S. State of Louisiana, raise challenging ethical concerns
 for physicians. Even if such interventions were to prove efficacious, which is far from certain, they would still raise troubling
 concerns regarding the degree of medical risk that may be imposed upon prisoners in the name of public safety as well as the
 appropriate role for physicians and other health care professionals in the administration of pharmaceuticals to competent
 prisoners over the inmates’ unequivocal objections. This paper argues that the concerns raised by chemical castration are
 grave enough that, until they are adequately addressed by policymakers, physicians ought not to participate in the process.
 
 
	Content Type Journal Ar...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5542383</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:06:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5542383</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical Issues in New Drug Prescribing</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5512724&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F1166320v0281m667%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;We use the format of a hypothetical case study to review issues related to pharmaceutical product approval and physician prescribing
 practices. In this case, a new FDA-approved drug is recommended for a patient who subsequently experiences an adverse event
 that may or may not be related to the prescription. This case raises a number of ethical and legal considerations physicians
 routinely face when deciding whether to recommend such drugs for their patients. Despite the need for ongoing observation
 by the regulatory apparatus, physicians should be cognizant of the limitations of the drug approval system and the post-approval
 prescription drug surveillance system. We discuss physicians’ ethical obligations when faced with a newly approved drug, including
 seeking ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5512724</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:43:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5512724</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mandatory Reporting: Watch Your (Legal) Language</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5512723&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F9n690n3r46482430%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Case StudiesPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9344-9Authors
		Kerry John Breen, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, 57-83 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, Victoria, 3006 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5512723</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:43:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5512723</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Turning a Blind Eye Is Unreasonable, Unprofessional, and Unethical</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5512725&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F734g88147j247137%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Case StudiesPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9340-0Authors
		Anthony G. Tuckett, The University of Queensland / Blue Care Research and Practice Development Centre, Toowong, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5512725</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:42:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5512725</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Overhauling America’s Healthcare Machine: Stop the Bleeding and Save Trillions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5492785&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F0410676670258301%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Book ReviewPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9339-6Authors
		Richard D. Lamm, University of Denver, Denver, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5492785</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 17:03:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5492785</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Eggsploitation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5465381&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fq125826772r6574x%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Film ReviewPages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9337-8Authors
		Leigh E. Rich, Armstrong Atlantic State University, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5465381</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:47:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5465381</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Do Embryos Have Interests?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5437470&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fm0225u5g565116h4%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Are embryos deserving of moral consideration in our actions? A standard view suggests that embryos are considerable only if
 they have interests. One argument for embryonic interests contends that embryos are harmed by death because they are deprived
 of valuable future lives as adult persons. Some have challenged this argument on the grounds that embryos aren’t identical
 to adults: either due to the potential for embryos to twin or because we do not exist until the fetus develops consciousness.
 These arguments fail to show that embryos do not have future adult lives. There is a better reason to think that embryos cannot
 have interests; namely, because they are not capable of having desires. Others have held this view but have not sufficiently
 justified it. The ju...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5437470</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:59:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5437470</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Match: Complete Strangers, A Miracle Face Transplant, Two Lives Transformed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5418074&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F18202322m322tm5l%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Book ReviewPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9338-7Authors
		Katrina A. Bramstedt, PO Box 1620, Sausalito, CA 94966, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5418074</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:48:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5418074</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An Odyssey With Animals: A Veterinarian’s Reflections on the Animal Rights and Welfare Debate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5404862&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fv1w6713wu2504v4l%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Book ReviewPages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9327-xAuthors
		Rob Irvine, Sydney Bioethics Program, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Medical Foundation Building, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Sydney, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5404862</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:54:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5404862</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Confronting Death in Legal Disputes About Treatment-Limitation in Children</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5397080&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fg06168046qql2751%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Most legal analyses of selective nontreatment of seriously ill children centre on the question of whether it is in a child’s
 best interests to be kept alive in the face of extreme suffering and/or an intolerable quality of life. Courts have resisted
 any direct confrontation with the question of whether the child’s death is in his or her best interests. Nevertheless, representations
 of death may have an important role to play in this field of jurisprudence. The prevailing philosophy is to configure death
 as a release from a futile or painful existence and/or as a dignified end in an objectively hopeless situation. However, there
 can be disagreement about the meaning of death in these settings. Some parents object that death would be premature or that
 it represe...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5397080</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:56:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5397080</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Unveiling the Past—Preparing the Conditions for Human Beings to Live in the Midst of One Another Again? A Response From Living in Northern Ireland</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5375929&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fx7krn132464540h2%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory SymposiumPages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9334-yAuthors
		Derick Wilson, University of Ulster, School of Education, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, BT52 1SA UK
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5375929</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:15:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5375929</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Tip of the Hat to Our Peer Reviewers</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5321702&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Ft1h577vp0wh8307n%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory EditorialPages 1-4DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9328-9Authors
		Michael A. Ashby, Palliative Care and Persistent Pain Services, Royal Hobart Hospital, Southern Tasmania Area Health Service and School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, 1st Floor, Peacock Building, Repatriation Centre, 90 Davey St, Hobart, TAS 7000, AustraliaLeigh E. Rich, Department of Health Sciences (Public Health), Armstrong Atlantic State University, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5321702</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:51:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5321702</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Omissions, Causation, and Responsibility</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5293639&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F55k8ggv46623w14h%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In this paper I discuss a recent exchange of articles between Hugh McLachlan and John Coggon on the relationship between omissions,
 causation, and moral responsibility. My aim is to contribute to their debate by isolating a presupposition I believe they
 both share and by questioning that presupposition. The presupposition is that, at any given moment, there are countless things
 that I am omitting to do. This leads both McLachlan and Coggon to give a distorted account of the relationship between causation
 and moral or (as the case may be) legal responsibility and, in the case of Coggon, to claim that the law’s conception of causation
 is a fiction based on policy. Once it is seen that this presupposition is faulty, we can attain a more accurate view of the
 logical...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5293639</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:51:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5293639</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Discussing Difference and Dealing With Desolation and Despair</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5281838&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Flq7142gv536g0648%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory EditorialPages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9331-1Authors
		Michael A. Ashby, Palliative Care and Persistent Pain Services, Royal Hobart, Hospital, Southern Tasmania Area Health Service, and School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, 1st Floor, Peacock Building, Repatriation Centre, 90 Davey Street, Hobart, TAS 7000 AustraliaLeigh E. Rich, Department of Health Sciences (Public Health), Armstrong Atlantic State University, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5281838</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:32:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5281838</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5269295&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fb0gu867434263386%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Case StudiesPages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9332-0Authors
		Sarah Winch, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia 4072Michael Sinnott, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia 4072
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5269295</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:47:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5269295</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response to Comments on “Truth in Reconciliation”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5269294&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fk424l82153775121%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory SymposiumPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9333-zAuthors
		Alphonso Lingis, Pennsylvania State University, 240 Sparks Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5269294</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:47:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5269294</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Conflicts of Interest and the Future of Medicine: The United States, France, and Japan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5233799&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fe44561w046284587%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Book ReviewPages 1-4DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9326-yAuthors
		Adam Licurse, Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USAAaron S. Kesselheim, Harvard Medical School, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 1620 Tremont St. Suite 3030, Boston, MA, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5233799</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:53:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5233799</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reflecting on the Psycholization of TRCs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5233800&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fw45p30642588054w%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory SymposiumPages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9329-8Authors
		Zvi Bekerman, School of Education, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel 91905
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5233800</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:53:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5233800</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Considering the “Born-Alive” Rule and Possession of Sperm Following Death</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5233801&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fh07788jg13pklu40%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Recent DevelopmentsPages 1-5DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9324-0Authors
		Bernadette Richards, Law School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, AustraliaBill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaTina Cockburn, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5233801</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:53:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5233801</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Destination Hospitals”—Design of Cleveland Clinic Hospital, Abu Dhabi</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5233802&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fgh3281u2xg62v21x%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Art ReviewPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9325-zAuthors
		Katrina A. Bramstedt, PO Box 1620, Sausalito, CA 94966, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5233802</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:53:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5233802</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5217915&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F5232828772887nm8%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Religious voices were important in the early days of the contemporary field of bioethics but have now become decidedly less
 prominent. This is unfortunate because religious elements are essential parts of the most foundational aspects of bioethics.
 The problem is that there is an incommensurability between religious language and languages of public discourse such as the
 “public reason” of John Rawls. To eliminate what is unique in religious language is to lose something essential. This paper
 examines the reasons for the marginalization of religion in bioethics, shows the limitations of Rawls’s notion of public reason,
 and argues for a more robust role for theology in articulating a new language for public discourse in bioethics.
 
 
	Content Type Journal Arti...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5217915</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 06:01:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5217915</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Ethics of Interpersonal Relationships</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5191405&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F2364107r5g01t72n%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Book ReviewPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9308-0Authors
		Meghan A. Harris, P.O. Box 1805, Sausalito, CA 94965, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5191405</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:58:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5191405</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rights of Authors: Do We Need Guidelines for Editors as Well?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5174034&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fe41v7248531883t2%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleCategory Letter to the EditorPages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9307-1Authors
		Yatan Pal Singh Balhara, Lady Hardinge Medical College and SSK Hospital, New Delhi, India
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5174034</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:49:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5174034</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5076555&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fx540436346687720%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9322-2Authors
		Steven Skov, Northern Territory Department of Health Centre for Disease Control, P.O. Box 40596, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia 0811
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5076555</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:52:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5076555</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent Developments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5048477&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F638v65820482w278%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-7DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9321-3Authors
		Cameron Stewart, Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaJohn Coggon, Institute for Science, Ethics, and Innovation, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5048477</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:02:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5048477</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“The Climax of Reconciliation”: Transgression, Apology, Forgiveness and the Body in Conflict Resolution</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5018145&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fu4017g3162004112%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;According to Charles Hauss, “[i]n the last few years, reconciliation has become one of the ‘hottest’ topics in the increasingly
 ‘hot’ field of conflict resolution” (2003, ¶1). However, despite the apparent interest in this “hot” academic topic (which is becoming increasingly warm in Canada
 as our own Truth and Reconciliation Commission commences), reconciliation studies have been dominated by Truth-based approaches.
 The restrictions of these approaches, which emphasize objectivity and rationality, often elide the body and the primacy of
 emotions in the reparative process. This essay begins a conversation on the role of the body and emotion in the study of reconciliation
 by engaging the work being done in the social sciences with contemporary trends...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5018145</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 06:31:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5018145</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4997187&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Ft5042x26gu2031q3%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-4DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9319-xAuthors
		Leigh E. Rich, Department of Health Sciences (Public Health), Armstrong Atlantic State University, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USAMichael A. Ashby, Palliative Care and Persistent Pain Services, Royal Hobart, Hospital, Southern Tasmania Area Health Service, and School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, 1st Floor, Peacock Building, Repatriation Centre, 90 Davey Street, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4997187</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:11:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4997187</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reconciliation and the Technics of Healing</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4983698&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fw6277w4t3636p687%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9318-yAuthors
		Paul A. Komesaroff, Monash Centre for Ethics in Medicine and Society, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., AustraliaElizabeth Kath, Global Cities Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, Vic., AustraliaPaul James, Global Cities Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4983698</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:52:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4983698</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4974787&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fn88n73gql22g8501%2F</link>
            <description>This study aimed to generate a rich, empirically-grounded understanding
 of the values held by journal editors and peer reviewers with a view to informing journal policy. Qualitative methods were
 used to carry out an inductive analysis of biomedical reviewers’ and editors’ values. Data was derived from in-depth, open-ended
 interviews with journal editors and peer reviewers. Data was “read for” themes relevant to reviewer anonymisation and interactions
 among editors, reviewers, and authors. Editors and peer reviewers provided three arguments that would support a more open
 and interactive peer-review process. First, a number of participants emphasised the importance of not only ensuring the scientific
 quality of published research but also nurturing their colleagues and supporti...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4974787</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:42:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4974787</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4974788&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F415488378h7228u6%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9320-4Authors
		Mark Woodrow, Wesley Emergency Centre, Chasely Street, Auchenflower, 4066 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4974788</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:03:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4974788</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republication: In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4974789&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fblp7136x8k767870%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9309-zAuthors
		Paul A. Komesaroff, Department of Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University Centre for Ethics in Medicine and Society, 99 Commercial Road, Prahran, Victoria 3143, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4974789</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:03:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4974789</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best Interest of the Child: Surrogate Decision Making and the Economics of Externalities</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4974790&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Ftp872454125026k8%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The case of Twin B involves the decision to send a newborn to a less intensive Level 2 special care nursery (SCN) than to
 the Level 3 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) that is considered optimal by the physician. The physician’s acceptance of
 the transfer is against the child’s best interest and is due to parental convenience. In analyzing the case, we reject the
 best interest standard. Our rejection is partly supported by the views of Douglas Diekema, John Hardwig, and Lannie Ross.
 Instead of the best interest standard, we offer and defend an approach we base on a microeconomic analysis of externalities,
 such as those involved with automobile emissions. This extends our previously presented general microeconomic approach to
 patient decision-making. It provi...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4974790</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:03:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4974790</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4974791&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Ff127634183157753%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9314-2Authors
		Malcolm Parker, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4974791</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:44:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4974791</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Film Review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4974792&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fk616558755210135%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9313-3Authors
		Katrina A. Bramstedt, Clinical Ethicist, AskTheEthicist.com, PO Box 1620, Sausalito, CA 94966, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4974792</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:35:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4974792</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mourning and Forgiveness as Sites of Reconciliation Pedagogies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4974793&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F7335q272wx1q6154%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This paper explores mourning and forgiveness not simply as sources of existential, political, or emotional meaning, but primarily
 as possible sites of reconciliation pedagogies. Reconciliation pedagogies are public and school pedagogical practices that examine how certain ideas can enrich our thinking
 and action toward reconciliation—not through a moralistic agenda but through an approach that views such ideas both constructively
 and critically. Mourning and forgiveness may constitute valuable points of departure for reconciliation pedagogies, if common
 pain is acknowledged as an important aspect of rehumanizing the “enemy-other.” This work is difficult and the wider society
 may be skeptical; however, such work is about assisting a “never again” mentality...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4974793</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:13:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4974793</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Truth in Reconciliation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4967735&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F0q5k451u3175128n%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;To what extent is truth required for reconciliation of peoples in conflict? What kind of truth? Objective truth, subjective
 truth? Maybe reconciliation require that the pursuit of truth be limited? The trial of the former “Khmer Rouge” leaders in
 Cambodia for crimes against humanity provides a case where these issues are examined.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-5DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9306-2Authors
		Alphonso Lingis, Pennsylvania State University, 240 Sparks Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4967735</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:42:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4967735</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Film Review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4951584&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fyx304l7r31j55738%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9311-5Authors
		Ariff Moolla, Bioethics Intern, AskTheEthicist.com, PO Box 1620, Sausalito, CA 94966, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4951584</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:46:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4951584</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sternberg, Eliezer J. 2010. My Brain Made Me Do It: The Rise of Neuroscience and the Threat to Moral Responsibility</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4951585&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F75n05lu48m8231x0%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9305-3Authors
		Peter B. Reiner, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4951585</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:46:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4951585</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Consent, Autonomy, and the Benefits of Healthy Limb Amputation: Examining the Legality of Surgically Managing Body Integrity Identity Disorder in New Zealand</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4920178&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fr455827v4lm21040%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Upon first consideration, the desire of an individual to amputate a seemingly healthy limb is a foreign, perhaps unsettling,
 concept. It is, however, a reality faced by those who suffer from body integrity identity disorder (BIID). In seeking treatment,
 these individuals request surgery that challenges both the statutory provisions that sanction surgical operations and the
 limits of consent as a defence in New Zealand. In doing so, questions as to the influence of public policy and the extent
 of personal autonomy become important. Beyond legal issues, BIID confronts dominant conceptions of bodily integrity, medical
 treatment, and ethical obligations. This paper seeks to identify the relevant public policy concerns raised by BIID in New
 Zealand and the limits of au...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4920178</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 05:57:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4920178</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In that Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4723094&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fbxn7v5730hq21373%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9301-7Authors
		Paul A. Komesaroff, Department of Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University Centre for Ethics in Medicine and Society, 99 Commercial Road, Prahran, Victoria 3143, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4723094</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:51:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4723094</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4723095&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fg63475006t288j35%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9302-6Authors
		Michael A. Ashby, Palliative Care and Persistent Pain Services, Royal Hobart Hospital, Southern Tasmania Area Health Service, and School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, 1st Floor, Peacock Building, Repatriation Centre, 90 Davey St, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, AustraliaLeigh E. Rich, Department of Health Sciences (Public Health), Armstrong Atlantic State University, 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4723095</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:53:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4723095</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent Developments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4692588&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fw24174051r943750%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-7DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9300-8Authors
		Bernadette Richards, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South AustraliaBill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaTina Cockburn, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4692588</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:58:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4692588</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>No Chance, No Value, or No Way: Reassessing the Place of Futility in Health Care and Bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4692589&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F1p0713480l40l347%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9303-5Authors
		Sarah Winch, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, AustraliaIan Kerridge, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4692589</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:45:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4692589</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Same Coin-Different Sides? Futility and Patient Refusal of Treatment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4669648&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fn2374010jjq45585%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9304-4Authors
		Eleanor Milligan, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Little High Street, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4669648</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:37:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4669648</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4641892&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F9h1p363141320054%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9296-0Authors
		Henry Kilham, General Medicine and Clinical Ethics, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW Australia 2063David Isaacs, The Centre for Values Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia 2006
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4641892</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:58:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4641892</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Futility Determination as a Process: Problems with Medical Sovereignty, Legal Issues and the Strengths and Weakness of the Procedural Approach</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4635976&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fm0625055352k7125%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Futility is not a purely medical concept. Its subjective nature requires a balanced procedural approach where competing views
 can be aired and in which disputes can be resolved with procedural fairness. Law should play an important role in this process.
 Pure medical models of futility are based on a false claim of medical sovereignty. Procedural approaches avoid the problems
 of such claims. This paper examines the arguments for and against the adoption of a procedural approach to futility determination.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-9DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9297-zAuthors
		Cameron Stewart, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW Australia 2006
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4635976</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 05:55:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4635976</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Marginalizing Experience: A Critical Analysis of Public Discourse Surrounding Stem Cell Research in Australia (2005–6)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4630934&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F767826376l551425%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Over the past decade, stem cell science has generated considerable public and political debate. These debates tend to focus
 on issues concerning the protection of nascent human life and the need to generate medical and therapeutic treatments for
 the sick and vulnerable. The framing of the public debate around these issues not only dichotomises and oversimplifies the
 issues at stake, but tends to marginalise certain types of voices, such as the women who donate their eggs and/or embryos
 to stem cell research and the patients who might benefit from its potential clinical outcomes. This paper draws on empirical
 research conducted on a recent stem cell policy episode in Australia. From the qualitative examination of 109 newspaper opinion
 editorials and twenty-three in...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4630934</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:05:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4630934</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Negative “GHIs,” the Right to Health Protection, and Future Generations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4630932&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F74704631333w273w%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The argument has been made that future generations of human beings are being harmed unjustifiably by the actions individuals
 commit today. This paper addresses what it might mean to harm future generations, whether we might harm them, and what our
 duties toward future generations might be. After introducing the “Global Health Impact” (GHI) concept as a unit of measurement
 that evaluates the effects of human actions on the health of all organisms, an incomplete theory of human justice is proposed.
 Having shown that the negative GHIs of our current generation cause unfair harm to future generations, I argue that each human
 being must be allocated a fair threshold of negative GHIs that should not be exceeded. By emphasising the need to consider
 all the GHIs of hu...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4630932</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:05:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4630932</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sharrock, Justine. 2010. Tortured: When good soldiers do bad things</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4630935&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fu662651663g1088k%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9299-xAuthors
		Leonard Rubenstein, Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4630935</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:56:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4630935</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Defining Medical Futility and Improving Medical Care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4621533&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fk652057401010772%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;It probably should not be surprising, in this time of soaring medical costs and proliferating technology, that an intense
 debate has arisen over the concept of medical futility. Should doctors be doing all the things they are doing? In particular,
 should they be attempting treatments that have little likelihood of achieving the goals of medicine? What are the goals of
 medicine? Can we agree when medical treatment fails to achieve such goals? What should the physician do and not do under such
 circumstances? Exploring these issues has forced us to revisit the doctor-patient relationship and the relationship of the
 medical profession to society in a most fundamental way. Medical futility has both a quantitative and qualitative component.
 I maintain that medical futil...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4621533</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:55:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4621533</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Futility of Futility: Death Causation is the ‘Elephant in the Room’ in Discussions about Limitation of Medical Treatment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4614729&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fggq10634n1024203%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The term “futility” has been widely used in medical ethics and clinical medicine for more than twenty years now. At first
 glance it appears to offer a clear-cut categorical characterisation of medical treatments at the end of life, and an apparently
 objective way of making decisions that are seen to be emotionally painful for those close to the patient, and ethically, and
 also potentially legally hazardous for clinicians. It also appears to deal with causation, because omission of a futile treatment
 cannot surely be a cause of death. The problem is that futility can be argued to be a “false friend”, in that it gives an
 appearance of representing a reliable conceptual basis, in ethics, for limitation of medical treatment—usually in the context
 of dying—...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4614729</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:28:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4614729</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Minimally Conscious States, Deep Brain Stimulation, and What is Worse than Futility</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4610264&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F0512m162w4p62v55%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The concept of futility is sometimes regarded as a cloak for medical paternalism in that it rolls together medical and value
 judgments. Often, despite attempts to disambiguate the concept, that is true and it can be applied in such a way as to marginalize
 the real interests of a patient. I suggest we replace it with a conceptual toolkit that includes physiological futility, substantial benefit (SB), and the risk of unacceptable badness (RUB) in that these concepts allow us to articulate what is at stake in ethical judgments where outcomes are crucial in determining
 what should be done.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-5DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9292-4Authors
		Grant Gillett, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioet...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4610264</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:48:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4610264</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Film Review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4580648&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fp76636m13106p214%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9287-1Authors
		Katrina A. Bramstedt, AskTheEthicist.com, PO Box 1992, Sausalito, CA 94966, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4580648</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:08:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4580648</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allhoff, Fritz, Patrick Lin, and Daniel Moore. 2010. What is nanotechnology and why does it matter? From science to ethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4580649&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fe4r302664k431p3g%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-3DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9289-zAuthors
		Jennifer Kuzma, University of Minnesota, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, 301 19th Ave So, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4580649</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:08:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4580649</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Unfit for Life”: A Case Study of Protector-Protected Analogies in Recent Advocacy of Eugenics and Coercive Genetic Discrimination</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4577754&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fl87j7k8j0vrg0140%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This paper utilizes Iris Marion Young’s critical, post-9/11 reading of Thomas Hobbes, “as a theorist of authoritarian government
 grounded in fear of threat” (Young 2003). Applying Young’s reading of Hobbes to the high-profile ethicist Julian Savulescu’s advocacy of genetic enhancement reveals
 an underlying unjust discrimination in Savulescu’s use of patriarchal protector–protected analogies between family and state.
 First, the paper shows how Savulescu’s concept of procreative beneficence, in which parents use genetic selection to have children who will have the “best lives” possible, is unjustly discriminatory
 against marginalized groups. Increasingly, however, he has invoked public security to justify genetic interventions. In recent
 speeches,...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4577754</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:59:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4577754</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medical Futility and the Death of a Child</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4565424&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fv021181533188445%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Our response to death may differ depending on the patient’s age. We may feel that death is a sad, but acceptable event in
 an elderly patient, yet feel that death in a very young patient is somehow unfair. This paper explores whether there is any
 ethical basis for our different responses. It examines in particular whether a patient’s age should be relevant to the determination
 that an intervention is medically futile. It also considers the responsibilities of health professionals and the rights of
 family members in situations where an interventions is clearly futile.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-7DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9288-0Authors
		Nancy S. Jecker, School of Medicine Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 9819...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4565424</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:04:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4565424</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republication: In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4559509&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fak225pk485028147%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9286-2Authors
		Bill Lukin, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4559509</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:47:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4559509</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4441686&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fu11674r432873415%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9285-3Authors
		Christopher James Ryan, Discipline of Psychiatry and the Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4441686</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:07:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4441686</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Gold-Plated Leucotomy Standard and Deep Brain Stimulation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4405095&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F5tk72w69483q2322%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Walter Freeman, the self styled neurosurgeon, became famous (or infamous) for psychosurgery. The operation of frontal leucotomy
 swept through the world (with Freeman himself performing something like 18,000 cases) but it has tainted the whole idea of
 psychosurgery down to the present era. Modes of psychosurgery such as Deep Brain Stimulation and other highly selective neurosurgical
 procedures for neurological and psychiatric conditions are in ever-increasing use in current practice. The new, more exciting
 techniques are based in a widely held philosophical position on the relationship between the mind, brain and soul, which is
 the key to ethical debates in this area. Psychosurgery has always posed questions of responsibility, personality, character,
 identity, spir...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4405095</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:32:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4405095</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Erratum: “This is Why you’ve Been Suffering”: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4405096&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fu5666p167740r617%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-1DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9284-4Authors
		Emily Borgelt, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaDaniel Z. Buchman, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaJudy Illes, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4405096</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:31:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4405096</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republication: In that Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4326802&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fe831h21g13r3xh44%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticlePages 1-2DOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9283-xAuthors
		Malcolm Parker, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4326802</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:51:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4326802</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Criminal Law as It Pertains to Patients Suffering from Psychiatric Diseases</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4324707&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fk647x5n3141x3m73%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The McNaughton rules for determining whether a person can be successfully defended on the grounds of mental incompetence were
 determined by a committee of the House of Lords in 1843. They arose as a consequence of the trial of Daniel McNaughton for
 the killing of Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel’s secretary. In retrospect it is clear that McNaughton suffered from schizophrenia.
 The successful defence of McNaughton on the grounds of mental incompetence by his advocate Sir Alexander Cockburn involved
 a profound shift in the criteria for such a defence, and was largely based on the then recently published “scientific” thesis
 of the great US psychiatrist Isaac Ray, entitled A Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity. Subsequent discussion
 of this defence ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4324707</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:45:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4324707</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Symposium: Neuroethics and Mental Health—Old Wine in New Bottles or a Legitimate New Field of Bioethical Inquiry</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4317904&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fu79260716r370446%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Neuroethics is a relatively novel field of investigation. Applied to mental health practice and research, neuroethics would
 seem to enlighten many traditional ethical connundra. This editorial introduces this symposium on neuroethics in the Journal
 of Bioethical Inquiry.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9267-xAuthors
		Michael Robertson, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine and Discipline of Psychiatry, K25, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4317904</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:54:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4317904</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4313553&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F92t8272l15037422%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9282-yAuthors
		Bill Lukin, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4313553</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 06:51:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4313553</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent Developments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4293383&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fd24x22010360r248%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9276-9Authors
		Cameron Stewart, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia 2006Bill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW AustraliaTina Cockburn, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld AustraliaJohn Coggon, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, and Institute for Science, Ethics, and Innovation, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4293383</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:02:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4293383</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4284769&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fh8t22u6133711910%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9275-xAuthors
		Tony Wild, Wesley Medical Centre, 40 Chasely Street, Auchenflower, 4066 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4284769</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:21:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4284769</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Petryna, Adriana. 2009. When experiments travel: Clinical trials and the global search for human subjects</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4284770&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fq035737u70345378%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9266-yAuthors
		Kevin A. Schulman, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4284770</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:21:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4284770</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4274922&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fh8u28j7xr123mt3p%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9274-yAuthors
		Robert King, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4274922</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:52:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4274922</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Art and Bioethics: Shifts in Understanding Across Genres</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4274923&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F82x62q8388711hm4%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This paper describes and discusses overlapping interests and concerns of art and bioethics and suggests that bioethics would
 benefit from opening to contributions from the arts. There is a description of recent events in bioethics that have included
 art, and trends in art that relate to bioethics. The paper outlines art exhibits and performances within two major international
 bioethics congress programs alongside a discussion of the work of leading hybrid and bio artists who experiment with material
 (including their own bodies) at the ambiguous intersections between art, bio art and bioethics. Their work seeks to engage
 audiences in challenging ethical precepts and assumptions about life and existence. We consider the response of art and social
 theorists and compa...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4274923</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:27:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4274923</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Psychiatric Molecular Genetics and the Ethics of Social Promises</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264492&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F73111458270l875k%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;A recent literature review of commentaries and ‘state of the art’ articles from researchers in psychiatric genetics (PMG)
 offers a consensus about progress in the science of genetics, disappointments in the discovery of new and effective treatments,
 and a general optimism about the future of the field. I argue that optimism for the field of psychiatric molecular genetics
 (PMG) is overwrought, and consider progress in the field in reference to a sample estimate of US National Institute of Mental
 Health funding for this paradigm for the years 2008 and 2009. I conclude that the amounts of financial investment in PMG is
 questionable from an ethical perspective, given other research and clinical needs in the USA.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-0...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264492</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:02:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264492</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>One Flu Over The Cuckoo’s Nest: Comparing Legislated Coercive Treatment for Mental Illness with that for Other Illness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264491&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Ff17w5ntt63m70465%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Many of the world’s mental health acts, including all Australian legislation, allow for the coercive detention and treatment
 of people with mental illnesses if they are deemed likely to harm themselves or others. Numerous authors have argued that
 legislated powers to impose coercive treatment in psychiatric illness should pivot on the presence or absence of capacity
 not likely harm, but no Australian act uses this criterion. In this paper, I add a novel element to these arguments by comparing
 the use of the harm to others justification for coercive treatment in mental illness with its use in illness due to infectious
 disease, and suggest a double standard applies. People with mental illness are subjected to coercive treatments at levels
 of risk to others far, fa...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264491</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:02:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264491</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264493&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fxp0734824g3x6211%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9278-7Authors
		Kate Cregan, Arts Graduate Research School, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Clayton, 3800 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264493</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:41:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264493</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“This is Why you’ve Been Suffering”: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264494&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fej1p02828n0j5070%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Mental health care providers increasingly confront challenges posed by the introduction of new neurotechnology into the clinic,
 but little is known about the impact of such capabilities on practice patterns and relationships with patients. To address
 this important gap, we sought providers’ perspectives on the potential clinical translation of functional neuroimaging for
 prediction and diagnosis of mental illness. We conducted 32 semi-structured telephone interviews with mental health care providers
 representing psychiatry, psychology, family medicine, and allied mental health. Our results suggest that mental health providers
 have begun to re-conceptualize mental illness with a neuroscience gaze. They report an epistemic commitment to the value of
 a brain scan t...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264494</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:41:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264494</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Constitutes Adequate Public Consultation? Xenotransplantation Proceeds in Australia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264495&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fw56702h182163r11%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The Australian moratorium on human clinical trials of xenotransplantation was lifted in December 2009. This decision follows
 public consultations on whether xenotransplantation should or should not proceed in Australia, which occurred in 2002 and
 2004. However, the public consultation, in its design and process, did not facilitate meaningful public engagement and involvement,
 thus marginalising the public and devaluing their social experiences and diverse knowledges. This brief article questions
 what constitutes adequate public consultation, and suggests that consensus conferences or citizen juries should be explored
 as a mechanism for meaningful public engagement for future public consultation exercises in Australia.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s1...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264495</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:41:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264495</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Issues and Challenges in Research on the Ethics of Medical Tourism: Reflections from a Conference</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264496&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fn433wgm0822hx080%2F</link>
            <description>In this report, we synthesize
 conference presentations and present three lessons from the conference: 1) Medical tourism research has the potential for
 cross- or inter-disciplinarity but must bridge the gap between researchers trained in ethical theory and scholars unfamiliar
 with normative frameworks; 2) Medical tourism research must engage with empirical research from a variety of disciplines;
 and 3) Ethical analyses of medical tourism must incorporate both individual and population-level perspectives. While these
 lessons are presented in the context of research on medical tourism, we argue that they are applicable in other areas of research
 where global practices, such as human subject research and health worker migration, are occurring in the face of limited regulatory
 oversight...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264496</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:20:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264496</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A New Challenge for Research Ethics: Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4264497&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fb724254753775184%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;It has become evident that neuroimaging raises new normative questions that cannot be addressed adequately within the (in
 this regard unspecific) frameworks of existing research ethics. Questions that are especially troubling are, among others,
 provoked by incidental findings. Two questions are particularly intricate in view of incidental findings: (1) How can the
 research subject’s right not to know be guaranteed? And (2) should a diagnostic check of scans by a neuroradiologist become
 an obligatory part of neuroscientific research protocols? The present paper examines these question against the background
 of two recent recommendations. The differentiation between “difference position” and “similarity position” serves as an analytic
 tool to further inves...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4264497</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:37:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4264497</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republication: In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4142506&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fk860110644701463%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9264-0Authors
		Malcolm Parker, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4142506</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:05:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4142506</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dignity Promotion and Beneficence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4096303&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F115154up26656422%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The concept of dignity has occasioned a robust conversation in recent healthcare scholarship. When viewed as a whole, research
 on dignity in healthcare has engaged each of the four bioethical principles popularized by Beauchamp and Childress, but has
 paid the least attention to beneficence. In this paper, we look at dignity and beneficence. We focus on the dignity promotion
 component of a model of dignity derived from a grounded theory study. After describing the study and presenting a précis of
 the resulting model, we review the principle of beneficence and look at the ways in which the notion of dignity promotion
 can be used to complement our understanding of this principle. Specifically, we explore what we can learn from dignity promotion
 about the relational ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4096303</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:10:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4096303</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4096304&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F4g025w4214275k74%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9260-4Authors
		Nancy Sturman, The Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital, Floor 8 Health Sciences Building, Herston, QLD 4029 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4096304</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:49:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4096304</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent Developments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4096305&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fk7817613j2w32731%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9256-0Authors
		Cameron Stewart, Centre of Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW AustraliaBernadette Richards, Faculty of Law, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4096305</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:49:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4096305</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4096306&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F3651u18280qj7777%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9262-2Authors
		Kate Cregan, Centre for Ethics in Medicine and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Alfred Centre Monash University, Level 6 (367), Bld 248, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, 3004 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4096306</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:48:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4096306</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In that Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4073153&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F354667n1365tu1g7%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9261-3Authors
		Malcolm Parker, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4073153</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:59:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4073153</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4064769&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Ft411124700065616%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9259-xAuthors
		Doris Schroeder, Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE England
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4064769</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 05:58:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4064769</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Human Non-persons, Feticide, and the Erosion of Dignity</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4053154&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F610m035741nv1762%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Feticide, the practice of terminating the life of an otherwise viable fetus in utero, has become an increasingly common practice
 in obstetric centres around the globe, a concomitant of antenatal screening technologies. This paper examines this expanding
 practice in light of the concept of human dignity. Although it is assumed from the outset that even viable human fetuses are
 not persons and as such do not enjoy full membership in the moral community, it is argued that the fact that these are nevertheless
 human fetuses affords them prima facie moral status. Thus even those who accept a liberal position with regard to therapeutic
 abortion, should be concerned about these more recent developments. Indeed, how we treat viable human fetuses has implications
 for our pr...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4053154</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:51:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4053154</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4001372&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fy432t71520055276%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9253-3Authors
		Brad Partridge, Program in Professionalism and Bioethics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905, USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4001372</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:00:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4001372</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dignity and Narrative Medicine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3998110&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fq44t75274625t270%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Critiques of the dehumanising aspects of contemporary medical practice have generated increasing interest in the ways in which
 health care can foster a holistic sense of wellbeing. We examine the relationship between two areas of this humanistic endeavour:
 narrative and dignity. This paper makes two simple arguments that are intuitive but have not yet been explored in detail:
 that narrative competence of carers is required for maintaining or recreating dignity, and that dignity promotion in health
 care practice is primarily narrative in form. The multiple meanings that dignity has in a person’s life are what give the
 concept power and can only be captured by narrative. This has implications for health care practice where narrative work will
 be increasingly requi...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3998110</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 05:52:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3998110</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3998109&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F908h8r172625t7g0%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9255-1Authors
		Cynthia Forlini, Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, 110, ave des Pins Ouest, Montréal, QC Canada H2W 1R7Eric Racine, Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, 110, ave des Pins Ouest, Montréal, QC Canada H2W 1R7
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3998109</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 05:52:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3998109</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent Developments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3801933&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fa0w0h76549h5u756%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9250-6Authors
		Cameron Stewart, University of Sydney Sydney Law School Sydney NSW Australia 2006John Coggon, University of Manchester Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, and Institute for Science, Ethics, and Innovation, School of Law Manchester UKBill Madden, University of Western Sydney School of Law Sydney NSW AustraliaTina Cockburn, Queensland University of Technology School of Law Brisbane Qld Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3801933</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:45:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3801933</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3786044&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F7x2hk66064h65816%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9251-5Authors
		Kate Cregan, Monash University Centre for Ethics in Medicine and Society Melbourne Australia 3800
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3786044</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:05:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3786044</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Diagnosis, Power and Certainty: Response to Davis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3786045&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fn670u84566258w88%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Lennard Davis’s “Biocultural Critique” of the alleged certainty of diagnosis (Davis Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7:227−235,
 2010) makes errors of fact concerning psychiatric diagnostic categories, misunderstands the role of power in the therapeutic relationship,
 and provides an unsubstantiated and vague alternative to the management of psychological distress via a conceptually outdated
 model of the relationships between physical and psychological disease and illness. This response demonstrates that diagnostic
 knowledge vouchsafes legitimate power to physicians, and via them relief to patients who suffer from psychological distress.
 The history of medicine and psychiatry demonstrates that psychiatric diagnosis shares many features with physical diagnosis,
 ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3786045</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:05:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3786045</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An Australian Based Study on the Readability of HIV/AIDS and Type 2 Diabetes Clinical Trial Informed Consent Documents</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3757346&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F523r30480k1ug347%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The aims of this study were to measure the readability of Australian based informed consent documents and determine whether
 informed consent readability guidelines have been established by Australian human research ethics committees (HRECs). A total
 of 20 informed consent documents, 10 HIV/AIDS and 10 type 2 diabetes, were measured for readability using the Simple Measure
 of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Gunning Fog Index (Fog). Published guidelines and policy statements of the two local HREC who approved
 the 20 clinical trials under study where examined to identify whether they had any formal policies/guidelines on the readability
 of informed consent documents. The two HRECs were contacted via e-mail to also determine whether they utilised any informal
 readability stan...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3757346</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:21:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3757346</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Nobel Prize as a Reward Mechanism in the Genomics Era: Anonymous Researchers, Visible Managers and the Ethics of Excellence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3742151&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fp112430847895101%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The Human Genome Project (HGP) is regarded by many as one of the major scientific achievements in recent science history,
 a large-scale endeavour that is changing the way in which biomedical research is done and expected, moreover, to yield considerable
 benefit for society. Thus, since the completion of the human genome sequencing effort, a debate has emerged over the question
 whether this effort merits to be awarded a Nobel Prize and if so, who should be the one(s) to receive it, as (according to
 current procedures) no more than three individuals can be selected. In this article, the HGP is taken as a case study to consider
 the ethical question to what extent it is still possible, in an era of big science, of large-scale consortia and global team
 work, to acknowl...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3742151</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:21:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3742151</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Film Review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3742150&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fp0782766w8792700%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9242-6Authors
		Katrina A. Bramstedt, Program in Medicine &amp; Human Values Clinical Ethicist, California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC) 2395 Sacramento Street, 3rd floor San Francisco CA 94115 USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3742150</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:21:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3742150</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Physician-Assisted Suicide: Views of Swiss Health Care Professionals</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3736688&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F4764382w286464j7%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9246-2Authors
		Eliane Pfister, University of Zurich Institute of Biomedical Ethics CH-8032 Zurich SwitzerlandNikola Biller-Andorno, University of Zurich Institute of Biomedical Ethics CH-8032 Zurich Switzerland
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3736688</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 05:44:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3736688</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Gerald Nissenbaum, JD and John Sedgwick. 2010. Sex, love and money: Revenge and ruin in the world of high-stakes divorce</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3736689&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F201p1r547077p810%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9243-5Authors
		Katrina A. Bramstedt, California Pacific Medical Center Clinical Ethicist, Program in Medicine &amp; Human Values 2395 Sacramento St, 3rd floor San Francisco CA 94115 USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3736689</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:05:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3736689</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sandra Shapshay. ed. 2009. Bioethics at the movies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3736690&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fh622p84q34511v2p%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9245-3Authors
		September Williams, Laguna Honda Hospital San Francisco Department of Public Health 375 Laguna Honda Blvd. San Francisco CA 94116 USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3736690</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:05:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3736690</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3729556&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fd5u0l6v0rk4k40w2%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9247-1Authors
		Jayne Lucke, University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research Building 71/918, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Site, Herston Brisbane Queensland 4029 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3729556</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 22:50:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3729556</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reply to Jacobs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3651960&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fp1vlg2267wq11223%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9241-7Authors
		Glen I. Spielmans, Metropolitan State University Department of Psychology 1450 Energy Park Drive St. Paul MN 55108 USAPeter I. Parry, Flinders University Department of Psychiatry Adelaide Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3651960</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:15:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3651960</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On Agonising: Street Charity and First Ethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3585070&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F3607u07588444504%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;To agonise is to “undergo great mental anguish through worrying about something,” according to the New Oxford Dictionary of
 English. I suggest that agonising in this sense is a fundamental response to any ethical dilemma. It has a long intellectual
 and literary lineage. In this essay, I agonise over the dilemmas posed by street beggars, their intrusiveness and their appeal
 to our intuitive sense of social duty. I explore the discomfort we may feel at their presence, and the value that discomfort
 may have for the evolution of our ethical lives.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9240-8Authors
		John Miles Little, University of Sydney Centre for Values, Ethics &amp; the Law in Medicine Building K25 Sydney NSW 2006 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3585070</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:58:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3585070</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republication: In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3581242&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F5720w2u13h014792%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9238-2Authors
		Sarah Winch, The University of Queensland School of Medicine Brisbane Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529
	
		Journal Volume Volume 7
	
		Journal Issue Volume 7, Number 2 / June, 2010 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3581242</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 08:22:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3581242</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reproductive Politics, Biopolitics and Auto-immunity: From Foucault to Esposito</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3563403&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F37553734838m7413%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The contingent cultural, epistemological and ontological status of biology is highlighted by changes in attitudes towards
 reproductive politics in the history of feminist movements. Consider, for example, the American, British, and numerous European
 instances of feminist sympathy for eugenics at the turn of the century. This amounted to a specific formation of the role,
 in late nineteenth and early twentieth century feminisms, of concepts of biological risk and defence, which were transformed
 into the justificatory language of rights claims. In this context, one can ask how reproductive politics are to be fitted
 into the paradoxical relationship between biopolitics and thanatopolitics discussed by Michel Foucault and more recently by
 Roberto Esposito. In this cont...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3563403</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 07:01:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3563403</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Vulnerability and the Ethics of Facial Tissue Transplantation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3546790&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fx831242415r38114%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Two competing intuitions have dominated the debate over facial tissue transplantation. On one side are those who argue that
 relieving the suffering of those with severe facial disfigurement justifies the medical risks and possible loss of life associated
 with this experimental procedure. On the other are those who say that there is little evidence to show that such transplants
 would have longterm psychological benefits that couldn’t be achieved by other means and that without clear benefits, the risk
 is simply too great. Ethicists on both sides have called for more analysis of the link between the face and personal identity
 in order to get a better grasp on potential gains and losses. This paper responds to that call by looking at contemporary
 philosophical anal...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3546790</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 08:51:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3546790</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent Developments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3542024&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fa0354158138j7155%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9235-5Authors
		John Coggon, University of Manchester Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Institute for Science, Ethics, and Innovation, School of Law Manchester UKCameron Stewart, University of Sydney Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School Sydney NSW 2006 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3542024</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 08:18:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3542024</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Foucault’s ‘Metabody’</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3542025&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fh63371052k3w9x4n%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The paper treats several ontological questions about certain nineteenth-century and contemporary medical and scientific conceptualizations
 of hereditary relation. In particular, it considers the account of mid-nineteenth century psychiatric thought given by Foucault
 in Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973–1974 and Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975. There, Foucault argues that a fantastical conceptual prop, the ‘metabody,’ as he terms it, was implicitly supposed by that
 period’s psychiatric medicine as a putative ground for psychiatric pathology. After presenting the heart of Foucault’s thought
 on the ‘metabody,’ the paper investigates the possibility that a contemporary version of a ‘metabody’ may oper...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3542025</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 08:18:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3542025</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The English Surgeon. 2008. Produced and directed by Geoffrey Smith. Eyeline Films and Bungalow Town Productions. English and Ukrainian, with English subtitles. 1 hour 33 minutes. http://www.theenglishsurgeon.com</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3518968&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Ft03030q6k257433p%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9225-7Authors
		Rebecca L. Volpe, California Pacific Medical Center Clinical Ethics Fellow, Program in Medicine &amp; Human Values 2395 Sacramento Street, 3rd floor San Francisco CA 94115 USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3518968</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:09:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3518968</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner, ed. 2008. Human genetic biobanks in Asia: Politics of trust and scientific advancement</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3514950&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F978555g6k878646t%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9234-6Authors
		Darryl Macer, UNESCO Bangkok Regional Adviser in Social and Human Sciences for Asia and the Pacific, Regional Unit for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific (RUSHSAP) 920 Sukhumvit Road, Prakanong Bangkok 10110 Thailand
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3514950</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:02:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3514950</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Bioethics of Diagnosis: A Biocultural Critique of Certainty</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3498588&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fm6711q5455433478%2F</link>
            <description>This article argues that traditional models of diagnosis are incomplete in their reliance on a models of certainty that are
 no longer tenable in a postmodern world. Further, it argues that the current form of diagnosis, as applied to psychiatric
 and affective disorders, reduces patient agency and reinscribes the effects of biopower.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9230-xAuthors
		Lennard J. Davis, University of Illinois at Chicago Department of ENGLISH-UIC 601 South Morgan Street (MC 162) Chicago IL 60607 USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3498588</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:24:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3498588</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Policing of Race Mixing: The Place of Biopower within the History of Racisms</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3493843&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F281343m461012622%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In this paper I investigate a largely untold chapter in the history of race thinking in Northern Europe and North America:
 the transition from the form of racism that was used to justify a race-based system of slavery to the medicalising racism
 which called for segregation, apartheid, eugenics, and, eventually, sterilization and the holocaust. In constructing this
 history I will employ the notion of biopower introduced by Michel Foucault. Foucault’s account of biopower has received a
 great deal of attention recently, but because what he actually has to say about race tends to be vague and radically incomplete,
 many race theorists have been critical of his contribution. However, even if the account of the holocaust in terms of biopower
 is incomplete, there is sti...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3493843</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:20:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3493843</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3493844&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fh54x06w374362u71%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9229-3Authors
		Letitia Helen Burridge, The University of Queensland Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine Level 8, Clinical Sciences Building,Royal Brisbane &amp; Women’s Hospitals,Herston Road, Herston Brisbane Qld 4006 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3493844</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:20:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3493844</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rogers, Wendy A., Annette J. Braunack-Mayer. 2009. Practical ethics for general practice, 2nd edition</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3482646&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fw134617u03r98233%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9231-9Authors
		Paul S. Mueller, Mayo Clinic 200 First Street, SW Rochester MN USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3482646</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:52:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3482646</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Continental Philosophy and Bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3482647&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F46w730283031342p%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9233-7Authors
		Catherine Mills, The University of Sydney Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, and, Unit for the History and Philosophy of Science Sydney NSW Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3482647</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:55:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3482647</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3482648&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F30u853tu7h521584%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9232-8Authors
		Grant Gillett, University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3482648</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:53:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3482648</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Playing God, Playing Adam: The Politics and Ethics of Enhancement</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3467261&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fu0nvk6777827m695%2F</link>
            <description>This article argues that none of the dominant positions
 on enhancement within the field of bioethics is entirely satisfactory due to the limited, monadic, pre-technological and non-cultural
 conception of the human that is adopted in these models. Critically engaging with both opponents of enhancement (Habermas)
 and its advocates (Harris, Agar, Bostrom, Dworkin), Zylinska also takes some steps towards outlining a nonnormative ethics
 of enhancement. The latter sees its human and non-human subjects as always already enhanced, and hence dependent, relational
 and coevolving with technology.
 
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9223-9Authors
		Joanna Zylinska, Goldsmiths, University of London Department of Media and Communications New Cross London SE14 6NW UK
	

	
		Journ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3467261</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:51:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3467261</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Letter to the Editor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3436195&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fy5335h1032570h31%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9226-6Authors
		Adam Jacobs, Dianthus Medical Limited London UK
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3436195</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:52:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3436195</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recombinant Identities: Biometrics and Narrative Bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3434857&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fc2w33472648436x3%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In recent years, there has been a growing interest in finding stronger means of securitising identity against the various
 risks presented by the mobile globalised world. Biometric technology has featured quite prominently on the policy and security
 agenda of many countries. It is being promoted as the solution du jour for protecting and managing the uniqueness of identity
 in order to combat identity theft and fraud, crime and terrorism, illegal work and employment, and to efficiently govern various
 domains and services including asylum, immigration and social welfare. In this paper, I shall interrogate the ways in which
 biometrics is about the uniqueness of identity and what kind of identity biometrics is concerned with. I argue that in posing
 such questions at th...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3434857</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:52:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3434857</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3432465&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fy551367x85u25l34%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9227-5Authors
		Malcolm Parker, University of Queensland School of Medicine Brisbane Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3432465</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:04:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3432465</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Body as Gift, Resource or Commodity? Heidegger and the Ethics of Organ Transplantation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3386808&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fehj15376p478v653%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Three metaphors appear to guide contemporary thinking about organ transplantation. Although the gift is the sanctioned metaphor for donating organs, the underlying perspective from the side of the state, authorities and the
 medical establishment often seems to be that the body shall rather be understood as a resource. The acute scarcity of organs, which generates a desperate demand in relation to a group of potential suppliers who are desperate
 to an equal extent, leads easily to the gift’s becoming, in reality, not only a resource, but also a commodity. In this paper, the claim is made that a successful explication of the gift metaphor in the case of organ transplantation
 and a complementary defence of the ethical primacy of the giving of organs need to be grounde...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3386808</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:26:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3386808</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recent Developments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3315966&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fl5g3160707094618%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9219-5Authors
		John Coggon, University of Manchester Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Institute for Science, Ethics, and Innovation, School of Law Manchester UKCameron Stewart, University of Sydney Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School Sydney Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3315966</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:58:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3315966</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>When Listening to the People: Lessons from Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for Bioethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3297903&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fg3v415mw82606317%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) have become increasingly popular over recent decades. Within bioethics CAM has
 so far mostly stimulated discussions around their level of scientific evidence, or along the standard concerns of bioethics.
 To gain an understanding as to why CAM is so successful and what the CAM success means for health care ethics, this paper
 explores empirical research studies on users of CAM and the reasons for their choice. It emerges that there is a close connection
 to fundamental principles of medical ethics. The studies also highlight that CAM’s holistic ontology of health and illness
 has an empowering effect on people in caring for their health, and on an even deeper level, safeguards against biomedicine’s
 reducing image of on...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3297903</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:56:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3297903</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reflexive Biomedicalization and Alternative Healing Systems</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3297904&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F07615t0842033770%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The utilization of alternative medical therapies and practitioners has increased dramatically in the U.S. in the last two
 to three decades. This trend seems paradoxical when one considers the rapid advances taking place in biomedical knowledge
 and technology during this same time period. Observers both inside and outside of the medical profession have attempted to
 explain the rising popularity of alternative medicine by proposing that it signals a growing sense of dissatisfaction and
 disenchantment with professional biomedical practices on the part of the lay public. This paper challenges this thesis and
 offers an alternative explanation, arguing that the rise of alternative medicine is a consequence of the success and expanding
 influence of biomedicine rather tha...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3297904</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:56:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3297904</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Spatialisation of Disease: Foucualt and Evidence-based Medicine (EBM)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3290529&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fv63j10j3g588n551%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;In this paper I draw on the French philosopher Michel Foucault for a viewpoint on aspects of EBM. This means that I develop
 his idea of the spaces occupied by disease. I give much of the paper to only one of these spaces, the space of perception
 of disease, in order to major on the medical gaze, one of Foucault’s best-known contributions to the philosophy of medicine.
 As I explain what I mean by each of the spaces of disease, I configure EBM into this space. The conscientious, explicit, and
 judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. Evidence-based clinical
 practice requires integration of individual clinical expertise and patient preferences with the best available external clinical
 evidence from systematic ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3290529</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:57:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3290529</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republication: In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3287279&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fp74l623632823uq1%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9221-yAuthors
		Dan Brock, Harvard University Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Division of Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School FXB Building, 651 Huntington Avenue, 6th Floor Boston MA 02115 USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3287279</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:03:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3287279</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editorial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3266522&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F774j84q355033310%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9220-zAuthors
		Kate Cregan, Monash University Centre for Ethics in Medicine and Society Melbourne Australia 3800
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3266522</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:20:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3266522</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Problematizing Biomedicine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3266523&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fe64x01tn7763l475%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9217-7Authors
		Grant Gillett, University of Otago Bioethics Centre Otago New Zealand
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3266523</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:20:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3266523</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Defending the Indefensible</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3243243&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fg385w6jh8x122571%2F</link>
            <description>This article concludes with reflections on what documents such as the UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights ought
 to be called to avoid the mislabelling of what essentially are policy documents.
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9209-7Authors
		Udo Schuklenk, Queen’s University Kingston ON Canada
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3243243</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:00:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3243243</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Trust and Distrust in CPR Decisions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3235359&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F522m37328420h1k2%2F</link>
            <description>This article will explore the role of trust in decision-making about cardiopulmonary resuscitation
 (CPR). In this research thirty-three senior doctors, junior doctors and division 1 nurses were interviewed about how decisions
 are made about providing CPR. Analysis of these interviews identified lack of trust as one cause for poor understanding of
 treatment decisions and lack of acceptance of medical judgement. Two key implications emerged from the analysis. First, before
 embarking on a discussion about CPR it is essential to establish trust between the doctor and the patient/family. Secondly,
 it is essential that the CPR discussion itself does not undermine trust and cause harm to the patient.
 
	Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9213-yAuthors
		Barbara Hayes, The Uni...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3235359</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:54:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3235359</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lafleur, William R., Gernot Bohme and Susumu Shimazono, eds. 2007. Dark medicine: Rationalizing unethical medical research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3235358&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fd22263777092m012%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-009-9204-zAuthors
		Stanley G. Korenman, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles CA USA
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3235358</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:54:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3235358</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is there a Real Nexus Between Ethics and Aesthetics?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3224740&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fj5632535j6771426%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Aesthetics is a vexed topic in philosophy, with a long history. For my purposes, an aesthetic experience is a foundational
 affective response to an object, to which terms such as “ugly”, “beautiful”, “pretty” or “harmonious” are applied. These terms
 are derived from a Discourse of aesthetics; some remain constant, others change from generation to generation. Aesthetics
 and ethics have been linked in Western thought since the days of Plato and Aristotle. This essay examines what is happening
 to that link in contemporary experience. It emphasises the ways in which the popular media exploit aesthetic appeal to penetrate
 their market, and to exploit and frame intuitive responses to current and past events. Production values, the artfulness of
 editors a...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3224740</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:04:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3224740</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reply to Udo Schuklenk</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3224742&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fh5256366862u58w1%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-009-9203-0Authors
		Mairi Levitt, Lancaster University Department of Philosophy, Furness College Lancaster LA1 4YG UKHub Zwart, Radboud University Nijmegen Department of Philosophy - Centre for Society &amp; Genomics, Faculty of Science - Institute for Science, Innovation &amp; Society P.O. Box 9010 6500 GL Nijmegen The Netherlands
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3224742</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:59:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3224742</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In that Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3224741&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F2413u15387107417%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9212-zAuthors
		Sarah Winch, The University of Queensland School of Medicine Brisbane Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3224741</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:59:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3224741</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Who’s a Quack?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3224743&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F9146k36534866001%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Are there any characteristics by which we can reliably identify and distinguish quackery from genuine medicine? A commonly
 offered criterion for the distinction between medicine and quackery is science: genuine medicine is scientific; quackery is
 non-scientific. But it proves to be the case that at the boundary of science and non-science, there is an entanglement of
 considerations. Two cases are considered: that of homoeopathy and that of the Quantum Booster. In the first case, the degree
 to which reported phenomena that question established theory should be doubted arises; in the second case, the status of pleomorphism
 as a scientifically plausible doctrine is discussed. The application of the criterion of being scientific to these cases reveals
 something of the ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3224743</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:59:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3224743</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3211824&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F22300764p56172v2%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9210-1Authors
		Paul Ananth Tambyah, National University of Singapore Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road Singapore 119074 Singapore
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3211824</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:54:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3211824</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>From Evidence-based Medicine to Marketing-based Medicine: Evidence from Internal Industry Documents</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3211825&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2Fb674622731k4850q%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;While much excitement has been generated surrounding evidence-based medicine, internal documents from the pharmaceutical industry
 suggest that the publicly available evidence base may not accurately represent the underlying data regarding its products.
 The industry and its associated medical communication firms state that publications in the medical literature primarily serve
 marketing interests. Suppression and spinning of negative data and ghostwriting have emerged as tools to help manage medical
 journal publications to best suit product sales, while disease mongering and market segmentation of physicians are also used
 to efficiently maximize profits. We propose that while evidence-based medicine is a noble ideal, marketing-based medicine
 is the current reality....</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3211825</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:08:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3211825</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3193243&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F1406m5752u1n3673%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-009-9206-xAuthors
		Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Universität zu Lübeck Institut für Medizingeschichte und Wissenschaftsforschung Königsstraße 42 23552 Lübeck Germany
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3193243</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:23:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3193243</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Paul Komesaroff. 2008. Experiments in love and death: Medicine, postmodernism, microethics and the body</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3193245&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F0p135159p31jh413%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-009-9205-yAuthors
		Christopher F. C. Jordens, The University of Sydney Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine Level 1, Building 1, Medical Foundation Building (K25) Sydney NSW 2006 Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3193245</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:23:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3193245</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Disclosure of Genetic Information: A Human Research Ethics Perspective</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3193244&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F873642x689755827%2F</link>
            <description>Abstract&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Increasing emphasis on genetic research means that growing numbers of human research projects in Australia will involve complex
 issues related to genetic privacy, familial information and genetic epidemiology. The Office of Population Health Genomics
 (Department of Health, Western Australia) hosted an interactive workshop to explore the ethical issues involved in the disclosure
 of genetic information, where researchers and members of human research ethics committees (HRECs) were asked to consider several
 case studies from an ethical perspective. Workshop participants used a variety of approaches to examine the complex ethical
 issues encountered, but did not consistently refer to the values and principles outlined in the National Statement on Ethical
 Conduct in Hum...</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3193244</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:23:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3193244</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republication: In That Case</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3044085&amp;cid=s_33341_74_f&amp;fid=33341&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springerlink.com%2Fcontent%2F385333u1456tt585%2F</link>
            <description>Content Type Journal ArticleDOI 10.1007/s11673-009-9196-8Authors
		Rob Irvine, University of Sydney Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine Sydney Australia
	

	
		Journal Journal of Bioethical InquiryOnline ISSN 1872-4353Print ISSN 1176-7529
	
		Journal Volume Volume 6
	
		Journal Issue Volume 6, Number 4 / December, 2009 (Source: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry)</description>
            <author>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3044085</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:58:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3044085</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

