<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Perspectives on Psychological Science via MedWorm.com</title>
        <description>MedWorm.com provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest items from the 'Perspectives on Psychological Science' source.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=Perspectives+on+Psychological+Science&t=Perspectives+on+Psychological+Science&s=Search&f=source]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:09:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Index</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965659&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.volindex_6.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965659</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965659</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Speculation to Inform and Speculation to Explore: Response to Craig et al. (2009) and Turkheimer &amp; Halpern (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965658&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01171.x</link>
            <description>This article, a follow-up to an empirical article on the same subject, was written with both of these purposes in mind. Many researchers are interested in uncovering the genetic mechanisms underlying general intelligence, so no doubt the roles of genes on the X chromosome will one day be understood. Psychologists can contribute best to these developments by being informed about the genetic issues involved. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965658</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965658</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Commentary on &quot;A Role for the X Chromosome in Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence?&quot; (Johnson et al., 2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965657&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01170.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Johnson et al.'s (2009) article highlights the role of X-chromosomal genes in general intelligence and draws attention to their potential role in explaining the observed greater variance for this trait in males and their excess at both extremes of the distribution. We note that this would result from a simple additive effect of X-linked intelligence genes and also discuss the potentially important contribution of recessive deleterious loci. The buffering effect of heterozygosity in females will be partly constrained by the skewing of X-inactivation patterns increasing the variance of females beyond what is expected. Furthermore, escape of some X-linked genes from inactivation may also be relevant to male[ndash]female variance comparisons. We also comment on the difficulty of...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965657</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965657</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sex Differences in Variability for Cognitive Measures: Do the Ends Justify the Genes? (Commentary on Johnson et al., 2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965656&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01169.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Theories about the origin of cognitive sex differences must address differences in three portions of ability distributions: low-tail variability, high-tail variability, and mean values. In addition, genetic theories must provide evidence that these three types of differences are (at least in large part) caused by alleles that are located on the X chromosome. It is well established that there are more mentally retarded males than females, and this disparity is attributable to genes located on the X chromosome. By contrast, there are no known &quot;intelligence genes&quot; that can provide a parallel explanation for differences in variability in the high ability tail of distributions. Mean differences between males and females also defy any X-linked hypothesis about average intelligence...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965656</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965656</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Role for the X Chromosome in Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965655&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01168.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]There is substantial evidence that males are more variable than females in general intelligence. In recent years, researchers have presented this as a reason that, although there is little, if any, mean sex difference in general intelligence, males tend to be overrepresented at both ends of its overall distribution. Part of the explanation could be the presence of genes on the X chromosome related both to syndromal disorders involving mental retardation and to population variation in general intelligence occurring normally. Genes on the X chromosome appear overrepresented among genes with known involvement in mental retardation, which is consistent with a model we developed of the population distribution of general intelligence as a mixture of two normal distributions. Using...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965655</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965655</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ten Statisticians and Their Impacts for Psychologists</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965654&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01167.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Although psychologists frequently use statistical procedures, they are often unaware of the statisticians most associated with these procedures. Learning more about the people will aid understanding of the techniques. In this article, I present a list of 10 prominent statisticians: David Cox, Bradley Efron, Ronald Fisher, Leo Goodman, John Nelder, Jerzy Neyman, Karl Pearson, Donald Rubin, Robert Tibshirani, and John Tukey. I then discuss their key contributions and impact for psychology, as well as some aspects of their nonacademic lives. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965654</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965654</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Monitoring Matters: Meta-Analytic Review Reveals the Reliable Linkage of Parental Monitoring With Adolescent Marijuana Use</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965653&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01166.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Parental monitoring is commonly accredited as an important protective factor against risky adolescent behaviors. In this meta-analytic review, associations of adolescents' perceptions of parental monitoring with adolescent marijuana use were collected and quantified across 25 independent samples from 17 empirical studies involving 35,367 unique participants. Applying a random-effects model, the average magnitude of effect was r=[minus].21. The association was significantly stronger in female-only samples (r=[minus].31 vs. r=[minus].19, p &lt; .001) and when parental monitoring was defined purely in terms of parental knowledge of the child's whereabouts, activities, and relations (r=[minus].24 vs. r=[minus].19, p &lt; .05). Cross-sectional (r=[minus].23) and longitudinal studies (r...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965653</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965653</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Educational Policy and Country Outcomes in International Cognitive Competence Studies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965652&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01165.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Prior studies of students' and adults' cognitive competence have shown large differences between nations, equivalent to a difference of 5 to 10 years of schooling. These differences seem to be relevant because studies using different research paradigms have demonstrated that population-level cognitive abilities are related to a number of important societal outcomes, including productivity, democratization, and health. In this overview of transnational differences, we document a number of positive predictors of international differences in student competence, including the amount of preschool education, student discipline, quantity of education, attendance at additional schools, early tracking, the use of centralized exams and high-stakes tests, and adult educational attainme...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965652</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965652</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Two Is Not Always Better Than One: A Critical Evaluation of Two-System Theories</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2965651&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01164.x</link>
            <description>This article critically examines the scientific advance offered by these theories (in particular advances in the domains of reasoning, decision making, and social cognition) and questions their theoretical coherence as well as the evidence for their existence. We scrutinize the conceptual underpinnings of two-system models and explicate the assumptions underlying these models to see whether they are reasonable. We also evaluate the empirical paradigms used to validate two-system models and ponder about their explanatory strength and predictive power. Given the popularity of these models, we discuss the appeal of two-system theories and suggest potential reasons for their prevalence. We comment on the potential costs associated with these models and allude to the desired nature of potential...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2965651</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2965651</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Erratum</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776790&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01163.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776790</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776790</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Giving Psychological Science Away: The Role of Applications Courses</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776789&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01162.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The applicability of basic research in psychological science is obvious to those in the field, but too often underappreciated outside of it. In this article, I suggest some reasons for that gap, including confusion between the relevance of psychological science and its actual application, which can lead to hype; the interdisciplinary nature of applied science, which can obscure the credit due to the field; and the considerable difficulty of moving basic research into application, including the potential for resistance to the products we deliver. I suggest that our own students constitute a relatively underutilized audience for demonstrating that psychological science has been critical to applications, and I describe an applied cognitive science course that is intended to mak...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776789</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776789</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Shared Reality: Experiencing Commonality With Others' Inner States About the World</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776788&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01161.x</link>
            <description>We present a new conceptualization of shared reality based on four conditions. We posit (a) that shared reality involves a (subjectively perceived) commonality of individuals' inner states (not just observable behaviors); (b) that shared reality is about some target referent; (c) that for a shared reality to occur, the commonality of inner states must be appropriately motivated; and (d) that shared reality involves the experience of a successful connection to other people's inner states. In reviewing relevant evidence, we emphasize research on the saying-is-believing effect, which illustrates the creation of shared reality in interpersonal communication. We discuss why shared reality provides a better explanation of the findings from saying-is-believing studies than do other formulations. ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776788</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776788</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rejoinder to Baumeister, DeWall, and Vohs (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776787&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01160.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776787</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776787</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Social Rejection, Control, Numbness, and Emotion: How Not To Be Fooled by Gerber and Wheeler (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776786&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01159.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Emotional numbness remains an empirically supported and theoretically intriguing pattern of response to social exclusion that warrants further research, and it would be a loss to the field if such research were prematurely terminated or hampered by the unwarranted conclusions from misleading meta-analyses. The meta-analyses by Gerber and Wheeler (2009, this issue) are based on a biased sample that omits much relevant work. Worse, the authors misinterpret what evidence they do assemble, even interpreting strong evidence for numbness as if it contradicted numbness. Their conclusions about control are similarly unfounded and misguided. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776786</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776786</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On Being Rejected: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Rejection</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776785&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01158.x</link>
            <description>This article presents the first meta-analysis of experimental research on rejection, sampling 88 studies. The results are consistent with a needs account, which states that rejection frustrates basic psychological needs, but not with a numbness account, which states that rejection causes physical and emotional numbness. Rejection moderately lowers mood (d=[minus]0.50) and self-esteem (d=[minus]0.70), but does not decrease arousal or flatten affect. Both belonging (d= 0.69) and control (d= 1.16) are frustrated by rejection. Aggressive responses to rejection, considered paradoxical by some, appear to be due to attempts to gain control; measures that contrast belonging and control (d=[minus]1.17) cause antisocial responding, whereas measures that do not allow for control to be restored cause ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776785</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776785</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Varieties of Perspectives on Creativity: Reply to Commentators</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776784&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01157.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]In this reply, I concentrate on two broad issues raised by the four commentaries in this issue: the hierarchical model of domains and individual differences in creativity. In the first case, I cite additional research to address the contrast between &quot;hard&quot; and &quot;soft&quot; domains and the application of this contrast to children, adolescents, and noneminent adults. In the second case, I introduce two recent studies to confirm the model's predictions regarding personal creative achievement. I hope that the original article, the commentaries, and this reply will inspire future inquiries into creativity in all its disciplinary varieties. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776784</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776784</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Simplifying Theories of Creativity and Revisiting the Criterion Problem: A Comment on Simonton's (2009) Hierarchical Model of Domain-Specific Disposition, Development, and Achievement</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776783&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01156.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT Simonton's (2009, this issue) hierarchical model represents a useful contribution to studies of creativity and eminence. Simonton breaks all kinds of new ground by extrapolating the hierarchy to the arts and humanities, interpolating it within disciplines, and relating it to family background and disposition. This commentary poses a few questions about the hierarchical model and proposes an alternative. I also introduce a candidate for a simple theory of creativity that focuses on a universally shared capacity. This simple theory complements Simonton's hierarchical view, though his applies best to actual performance and the simple theory of creativity applies to creative potential. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776783</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776783</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Psychology of Simonton's Science: Commentary on Simonton (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776782&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01155.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]One key assumption of the psychology of science is that psychological factors make certain interests, talents, and abilities more likely and others less likely (Feist, 2006). The line of argument that Simonton (2009, this issue) puts forth[mdash]integrating and uniting the metaliteratures on dispositional and developmental influences on scientific and artistic creativity[mdash]is not only consistent with this assumption from the psychology of science, but it is also a breeding ground for a host of testable hypotheses and calls for future empirical investigations. Given Simonton's own extraordinary levels of scientific creativity, indeed it would be interesting to turn his ideas back on him to see how his science is a product of his own developmental and dispositional experie...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776782</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776782</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sources of Scientific Innovation: A Meta-Analytic Approach (Commentary on Simonton, 2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776781&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01154.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Innovations in science can be divided into at least four major types: radical revolutions (such as Copernican and Darwinian theory), technical revolutions (led by scientists such as Newton, Lavoisier, and Einstein), controversial innovations (for example, Semmelweis's theory of puerperal fever), and conservative innovations (eugenics and various vitalistic doctrines). Biographical predictors of support for scientific innovations are distinctly different depending on the type of innovation, as are the predictors of who initially engineers such innovations. A meta-analytic approach assessing each new scientific theory according to its salient features (including epistemological, ideological, and technical attributes) is required to make sense out of the varied predisposing fac...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776781</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776781</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is One Dimension Enough? A Response to Simonton's Varieties of (Scientific) Creativity (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776780&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01153.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]We admire Simonton's valiant attempt to bring all of creativity under a single dimension. We offer a view that is sometimes complementary and sometimes distinct from Simonton's model: Our own multidimensional amusement park theoretical model, which tries to integrate domain-specific and domain-general points of view. We eagerly await future research on Simonton's model and are curious of how his hard[ndash]soft dimension can be included into the creativity pantheon. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776780</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776780</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Varieties of (Scientific) Creativity: A Hierarchical Model of Domain-Specific Disposition, Development, and Achievement</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2776779&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01152.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Prior research supports the inference that scientific disciplines can be ordered into a hierarchy ranging from the &quot;hard&quot; natural sciences to the &quot;soft&quot; social sciences. This ordering corresponds with such objective criteria as disciplinary consensus, knowledge obsolescence rate, anticipation frequency, theories-to-laws ratio, lecture disfluency, and age at recognition. It is then argued that this hierarchy can be extrapolated to encompass the humanities and arts and interpolated within specific domains to accommodate contrasts in subdomains (e.g., revolutionary versus normal science). This expanded and more finely differentiated hierarchy is then shown to have a partial psychological basis in terms of dispositional traits (e.g., psychopathology) and developmental experience...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2776779</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2776779</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Kind of Empirical Research Should We Publish, Fund, and Reward?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578902&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01151.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]When evaluating empirical papers for publication, grant proposals, or individual contributions (e.g., awarding tenure), the basic question one should ask is how much the contribution adds to understanding in psychology and not whether the contribution takes a particular form or represents one particular model of how to do empirical studies. Academic psychology has flourished with its mastery of the hypothesis[ndash]experiment model of science and its expertise in generating and eliminating alternative hypotheses and isolating causation. These accomplishments are a critical part of psychology, and they are well and appropriately taught by psychologists. However, they are only a part of science and should not comprise the almost exclusive criteria for evaluating research. In p...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578902</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578902</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Human&amp;#x2013;Android Interaction in the Near and Distant Future</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578901&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01150.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]In this article, a psychologist and an artificial-intelligence (AI) researcher speculate on the future of social interaction between humans and androids (robots designed to look and act exactly like people). We review the trajectory of currently developing robotics technologies and assess the level of android sophistication likely to be achieved in 50 years time. On the basis of psychological research, we consider obstacles to creating an android indistinguishable from humans. Finally, we discuss the implications of human[ndash]android social interaction from the standpoint of current psychological and AI research and speculate on the novel psychological issues likely to arise from such interaction. The science of psychology will face a remarkable new set of challenges in gr...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578901</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578901</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Achieving and Sustaining a Good Life</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578900&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01149.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]How can we live well? To answer this question, psychology must acknowledge and integrate its descriptive and prescriptive components. One of psychology's strengths has been its willingness to embrace different purposes, perspectives, and approaches, and this recommendation is in the spirit of the field's history. At present, psychology knows more about people's problems and how to solve them than it does about what it means to live well and how to encourage and maintain such a life. Moreover, what is known is often fragmented because of psychology's specialization. Our article calls for further discussion in psychological terms of what it means to live well; the study of actual people and how they behave; multivariate, multimethod, and longitudinal research; more sophisticat...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578900</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578900</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Do Different Individuals Progress Along Different Life Trajectories?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578899&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01148.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The core marker of progress in psychological science is the degree to which our work enhances the welfare of people. In order to effectively enhance human welfare, we must develop comprehensive models that explain why different individuals progress along different life trajectories. Exciting theoretical accounts that describe transitional processes from gene polymorphisms through moment-to-moment behavior are beginning to emerge. These early accounts highlight opportunities to investigate specific transitional steps along that long pathway, the need to understand the universal and the contextual aspects of psychological processes, and the need to define and measure psychological constructs with more precision and clarity. It is likely that creative new research in each of th...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578899</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578899</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mechanisms of Gene&amp;#x2013;Environment Interaction Effects in the Development of Conduct Disorder</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578898&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01147.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The gene[ndash]environment interaction effect in the development of conduct disorder is one of the most important discoveries of the past decade, but the mechanisms through which this effect operates remain elusive. I propose a model of these processes that focuses on the individual's response to a threatening stimulus in ongoing social interaction. The individual's response coordinates three interrelated systems: neural, autonomic, and information-processing. In each system, adaptive, evolutionarily selected response patterns characterize normal responding, but in psychopathology these patterns have gone awry. Antecedents of individual differences in these response patterns arise from genetic polymorphisms, adverse environmental experiences early in life, and their interact...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578898</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578898</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Perspectives on Preference Aggregation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578897&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01146.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]For centuries, the mathematical aggregation of preferences by groups, organizations, or society itself has received keen interdisciplinary attention. Extensive theoretical work in economics and political science throughout the second half of the 20th century has highlighted the idea that competing notions of rational social choice intrinsically contradict each other. This has led some researchers to consider coherent democratic decision making to be a mathematical impossibility. Recent empirical work in psychology qualifies that view. This nontechnical review sketches a quantitative research paradigm for the behavioral investigation of mathematical social choice rules on real ballots, experimental choices, or attitudinal survey data. The article poses a series of open questi...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578897</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578897</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Unpacking Intuition: A Conjecture</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578896&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01145.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Can intuition be taught? The way in which faces are recognized, the structure of natural classes, and the architecture of intuition may all be instances of the same process. The conjecture that intuition is a species of recognition memory implies that human intuitive decision making can be enormously enhanced by virtual simulation. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578896</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578896</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Giving Debiasing Away: Can Psychological Research on Correcting Cognitive Errors Promote Human Welfare?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578895&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01144.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Despite Miller's (1969) now-famous clarion call to &quot;give psychology away&quot; to the general public, scientific psychology has done relatively little to combat festering problems of ideological extremism and both inter- and intragroup conflict. After proposing that ideological extremism is a significant contributor to world conflict and that confirmation bias and several related biases are significant contributors to ideological extremism, we raise a crucial scientific question: Can debiasing the general public against such biases promote human welfare by tempering ideological extremism? We review the knowns and unknowns of debiasing techniques against confirmation bias, examine potential barriers to their real-world efficacy, and delineate future directions for research on debi...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578895</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578895</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Know Thyself</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578894&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01143.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Self-knowledge has never been a central topic in empirical psychology. There are pockets of research on self-knowledge in different subdisciplines of the field, but until now there has been little communication between them. I believe that these areas will converge in the next few years into a cohesive study of how people form judgments about their past, current, and future selves and about the accuracy of these judgments. I discuss theoretical developments in this area, the costs of poor self-knowledge, how people can know themselves better, and some of the obstacles to the study of self-knowledge. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578894</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578894</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Can Decision Making Be Improved?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578893&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01142.x</link>
            <description>This article argues that the time has come to focus attention on the search for strategies that will improve bounded judgment because decision-making errors are costly and are growing more costly, decision makers are receptive, and academic insights are sure to follow from research on improvement. In addition to calling for research on improvement strategies, this article organizes the existing literature pertaining to improvement strategies and highlights promising directions for future research. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578893</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578893</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can We Improve Our Physical Health by Altering Our Social Networks?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578892&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01141.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Persons with more types of social relationships live longer and have less cognitive decline with aging, greater resistance to infectious disease, and better prognoses when facing chronic life-threatening illnesses. We have known about the importance of social integration (engaging in diverse types of relationships) for health and longevity for 30 years. Yet, we still do not know why having a more diverse social network would have a positive influence on our health, and we have yet to design effective interventions that influence key components of the network and in turn physical health. Better understanding of the role of social integration in health will require research on how integrated social networks influence health relevant behaviors, regulate emotions and biological ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578892</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578892</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to Tell If a Particular Memory Is True or False</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578891&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01140.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]How can you tell if a particular memory belonging to you or someone else is true or false? Cognitive scientists use a variety of techniques to measure groups of memories, whereas police, lawyers, and other researchers use procedures to determine whether an individual can be believed or not. We discuss evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging studies and research on lying that have attempted to distinguish true from false memories. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578891</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578891</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Psychoneuroimmunology: Psychology's Gateway to the Biomedical Future</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578890&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01139.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]How do stressful events and negative emotions influence the immune system, and how big are the effects? This broad question has been intensely interesting to psychoneuroimmunology researchers over the last 3 decades. Many promising lines of work underscore the reasons why this question is still so important and pivotal to understanding and other advances. New multidisciplinary permutations provide fresh vistas and emphasize the importance of training psychologists more broadly so that they will be central and essential players in the advancement of biomedical science. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578890</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578890</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Can Evolutionary Psychology Successfully Explain Personality and Individual Differences?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578889&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01138.x</link>
            <description>This article highlights some promising theoretical directions for tackling this question. These include life-history theory, costly signaling theory, environmental variability in fitness optima, frequency-dependent selection, mutation load, and flexibly contingent shifts in strategy according to environmental conditions. Tackling the explanatory question also requires progress on three fronts: (a) reframing some personality traits as forms of strategic individual differences; (b) providing a nonarbitrary, evolutionary-based formulation of environments as distributions and salience profiles of adaptive problems; and (c) identifying which strategies thrive and which falter in these differing problem-defined environments. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578889</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578889</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The &quot;Humpty Dumpty Problem&quot; in the Study of Early Cognitive Development: Putting the Infant Back Together Again</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578888&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01137.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]In this article, I propose that the big question for the field of infant cognitive development is best characterized as the &quot;Humpty Dumpty problem&quot;: Now that we have studied cognitive abilities in isolation, how do we put the developing cognitive system (and the infant) back together again? This problem is significant because cognitive abilities do not occur in isolation. Infants remember the items they have attended to and perceived, and their emotional state will influence their perception and representation of the events they encounter. Moreover, by examining the development of the whole cognitive system, or the whole child, we gain a deeper understanding of mechanisms developmental change. Thus, the big question for the study of infant cognition is like the question conf...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578888</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578888</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Nature (and Nurture?) of Plasticity in Early Human Development</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578887&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01136.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The effect of early experience is a long-standing concern in developmental psychology. Gaining further insight into the nature of human plasticity is central to efforts to prevent problems in development from arising and promote positive functioning. Evolutionary reasoning suggests that children should vary in their susceptibility to environmental influences, including parenting. Evidence indicates that rather than some children, such as those with negatively emotional temperaments or certain genotypes, being simply more vulnerable to the adverse effects of negative experiences, as commonly assumed, they may actually be more susceptible to both positive and negative experiences. In addition to raising questions about the nature of plasticity in human development, this articl...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578887</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578887</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Naive and Obvious Questions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578886&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01135.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Psychology is the luckiest of the sciences because it owns the most interesting questions, the foremost being, &quot;Why do people do what they do?&quot; Naively, one might expect that research addressing this question would focus on the most important behaviors, but instead most studies choose behavioral dependent variables on the basis of their procedural feasibility and suitability for theory testing. The cumulative result is an uneven and unrepresentative map of the behavioral terrain. Situational variables are chosen in a similar manner with a parallel result. (Personality variables, in contrast, typically are designed to capture intrinsically important individual differences.) In this article, I proposes a simple research agenda that measures situational and behavioral variables...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578886</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578886</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Future of Psychology: Connecting Mind to Brain</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578885&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01134.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Psychological states such as thoughts and feelings are real. Brain states are real. The problem is that the two are not real in the same way, creating the mind[ndash]brain correspondence problem. In this article, I present a possible solution to this problem that involves two suggestions. First, complex psychological states such as emotion and cognition can be thought of as constructed events that can be causally reduced to a set of more basic, psychologically primitive ingredients that are more clearly respected by the brain. Second, complex psychological categories like emotion and cognition are the phenomena that require explanation in psychology, and, therefore, they cannot be abandoned by science. Describing the content and structure of these categories is a necessary a...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578885</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578885</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editor's Introduction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2578884&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01133.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2578884</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2578884</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Commentary on Vul et al.'s (2009)&quot;Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2482364&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01126.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The article &quot;Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition&quot; (Vul, Harris, Winkielman, &amp; Pashler, 2009, this issue) makes a broad case that current practice in neuroimaging methodology is deficient. Vul et al. go so far as to demand that authors retract or restate results, which we find wrongly casts suspicion on the confirmatory inference methods that form the foundation of neuroimaging statistics. We contend the authors' argument is overstated and that their work can be distilled down to two points already familiar to the neuroimaging community: that the multiple testing problem must be accounted for, and that reporting of methods and results should be improved. We also illuminate their concerns with standard statistical concepts...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2482364</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2482364</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reply to Comments on &quot;Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410221&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01132.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410221</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410221</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Understanding the Mind by Measuring the Brain: Lessons From Measuring Behavior (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410220&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01131.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Throughout the history of psychology, the path of transforming the physical (muscle movements, verbal behavior, or physiological changes) into the mental has been fraught with difficulty. Over the decades, psychologists have risen to the challenge and learned a few things about how to infer the mental from measuring the physical. The Vul, Harris, Winkielman, and Pashler article (2009, this issue) points out that some of these lessons could be helpful to those of us who measure blood flow in the brain in a quest to understand the mind. Three lessons from psychometrics are discussed. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410220</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410220</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Correlations and Multiple Comparisons in Functional Imaging: A Statistical Perspective (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410219&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01130.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Vul, Harris, Winkielman, and Pashler (2009, this issue) claim in their article that the correlations reported in fMRI studies are commonly overstated because researchers tend to report only the highest correlations or only those correlations that exceed some threshold. Their article has in a short time given rise to a spirited debate about key statistical issues at the heart of most functional neuroimaging studies. The debate provides a useful opportunity to discuss core statistical issues in neuroimaging and ultimately provides a chance for the field to grow and move forward. This commentary approaches the debate from a fundamentally statistical perspective. We begin by summarizing several of the key points under discussion, followed by our own commentary on these issues fr...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410219</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410219</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Discussion of &quot;Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition&quot; by Vul et al. (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410218&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01129.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]In their article, Vul, Harris, Winkielman, and Pashler (2009, this issue) raise the issue of nonindependent analysis in behavioral neuroimaging, whereby correlations are artificially inflated as a result of spurious statistical procedures. In this comment, I note that the phenomenon in question is a type of selection bias and hence is neither new nor unique to fMRI. The use of massive, complex data sets (common in modern applications) to answer increasingly intricate scientific questions presents many potential pitfalls to valid statistical analysis. Strong collaboration between statisticians and scientists and the development of statistical methods specific to the types of data encountered in practice can help researchers avoid these pitfalls. (Source: Perspectives on Psych...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410218</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410218</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Correlations in Social Neuroscience Aren't Voodoo: Commentary on Vul et al. (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410217&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01128.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Vul, Harris, Winkielman, and Pashler (2009, this issue) claim that many brain[ndash]personality correlations in fMRI studies are &quot;likely [hellip] spurious&quot; (p. 274), and &quot;should not be believed&quot; (p. 285). Several of their conclusions are incorrect. First, they incorrectly claim that whole-brain regressions use an invalid and &quot;nonindependent&quot; two-step inferential procedure, a determination based on a survey sent to researchers that only included nondiagnostic questions about the descriptive process of plotting one's data. We explain how whole-brain regressions are a valid single-step method of identifying brain regions that have reliable correlations with individual difference measures. Second, they claim that large correlations from whole-brain regression analyses may be the...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410217</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410217</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Big Correlations in Little Studies: Inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power&amp;#x2014;Commentary on Vul et al. (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410216&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01127.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Vul, Harris, Winkielman, and Pashler (2009, this issue) argue that correlations in many cognitive neuroscience studies are grossly inflated due to a widespread tendency to use nonindependent analyses. In this article, I argue that Vul et al.'s primary conclusion is correct, but for different reasons than they suggest. I demonstrate that the primary cause of grossly inflated correlations in whole-brain fMRI analyses is not nonindependence, but the pernicious combination of small sample sizes and stringent alpha-correction levels. Far from defusing Vul et al.'s conclusions, the simulations presented suggest that the level of inflation may be even worse than Vul et al.'s empirical analysis would suggest. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410216</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410216</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Commentary on Vul et al.'s (2009) &quot;Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410215&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01126.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The article &quot;Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition&quot; (Vul, Harris, Winkielman, &amp; Pashler, 2009, this issue) makes a broad case that current practice in neuroimaging methodology is deficient. Vul et al. go so far as to demand that authors retract or restate results, which we find wrongly casts suspicion on the confirmatory inference methods that form the foundation of neuroimaging statistics. We contend the authors' argument is overstated and that their work can be distilled down to two points already familiar to the neuroimaging community: that the multiple testing problem must be accounted for, and that reporting of methods and results should be improved. We also illuminate their concerns with standard statistical concepts...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410215</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410215</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition1</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410214&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01125.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition have drawn much attention in recent years, with high-profile studies frequently reporting extremely high (e.g., &gt;.8) correlations between brain activation and personality measures. We show that these correlations are higher than should be expected given the (evidently limited) reliability of both fMRI and personality measures. The high correlations are all the more puzzling because method sections rarely contain much detail about how the correlations were obtained. We surveyed authors of 55 articles that reported findings of this kind to determine a few details on how these correlations were computed. More than half acknowledged using a strategy that computes separate correlati...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410214</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410214</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Editor's Introduction to Vul et al. (2009) and Comments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410213&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01124.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410213</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410213</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patterns of Thinking in Militant Extremism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410212&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01123.x</link>
            <description>We examined extremist groups from a diverse range of continents, cultures, and political and religious orientations. We compared statements by (and, to some degree, statements about) these groups and formulated 16 themes common to the militant-extremist mind-set. Among these themes are perceptions of a crisis involving violations of posited sacred values, along with justifications for the use of violence to remediate such problems. There are indications that such themes are not infrequent in the general population. For example, research participants failed to strongly disassociate themselves from the sentiments and framings found in the fanatical items, which undercuts the notion that militant-extremist thinking represents bizarre ideation. Militant-extremist thinking appears to represent ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410212</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410212</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Understanding the Links Between Social Support and Physical Health: A Life-Span Perspective With Emphasis on the Separability of Perceived and Received Support</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410211&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01122.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Social support has been reliably related to physical health outcomes. However, the conceptual basis of such links needs greater development. In this article, I argue for a life-span perspective on social support and health that takes into account distinct antecedent processes and mechanisms that are related to measures of support over time. Such a view highlights the need to distinguish measures of perceived and received support and its links to more specific diseases (e.g., chronic, acute) and stages of disease development (e.g., incidence). I discuss both the novel implications of these theoretical arguments for research on social support and physical health, as well as the potential intervention approaches that are apparent from this perspective. (Source: Perspectives on ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410211</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410211</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Founding of the Association for Psychological Science: Part 2. The Tipping Point and Early Years</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410210&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01121.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The founding of the Association for Psychological Science (APS) occurred in the context of long-standing dialectical tensions within organized psychology. It represents the most recent breakaway effort from the American Psychological Association (APA), psychology's parent association in the United States. Beginning in the 1970s, numerous APA committees deliberated the Association's structure, making recommendations designed to appease the various constituencies within the changing organization; all but the last of these proposals were ultimately rejected by the APA Council. In 1987, the Assembly for Scientific and Applied Psychologists (ASAP) formed to encourage APA reorganization, and in early 1988, the APA Council approved a reorganization plan; that plan was, however, rej...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410210</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410210</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Founding of the Association for Psychological Science: Part 1. Dialectical Tensions Within Organized Psychology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2410209&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01120.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The founding of the Association for Psychological Science (APS) did not represent the first time a group of psychologists broke away from the American Psychological Association, the parent association of organized psychology in the United States. In fact, the history of organized psychology is replete with examples of splinter groups that sought to better represent the needs and interests of their specific constituencies. All of these breakaway efforts have occurred amid intradisciplinary tensions[mdash]the continual push and pull between unity on the one hand and autonomy on the other[mdash]that reflect some of the enduring challenges of the field. A historical examination of this dialectic provides a useful framework within which to understand the founding of the APS, its ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2410209</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2410209</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Origins of Face Processing in Humans: Phylogeny and Ontogeny</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253914&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01119.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Faces are crucial for nonverbal communication in humans and related species. From the first moments of life, newborn infants prefer to look at human faces over almost any other form of stimuli. Since this finding was first observed, there has been much debate regarding the &quot;special&quot; nature of face processing. Researchers have put forward numerous developmental models that attempt to account for this early preference and subsequent maturation of the face processing system. In this article, we review these models and their supporting evidence drawing on literature from developmental, evolutionary, and comparative psychology. We conclude that converging data from these fields strongly suggests that face processing is conducted by a dedicated and complex neural system, is not hu...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253914</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253914</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Investigating the Awareness of Remembering</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253913&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01118.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]There is a marked lack of consensus concerning the best way to learn how conscious experiences arise. In this article, we advocate for scientific approaches that attempt to bring together four types of phenomena and their corresponding theoretical accounts: behavioral acts, cognitive events, neural events, and subjective experience. We propose that the key challenge is to comprehensively specify the relationships among these four facets of the problem of understanding consciousness without excluding any facet. Although other perspectives on consciousness can also be informative, combining these four perspectives could lead to significant progress in explaining a conscious experience such as remembering. We summarize some relevant findings from cognitive neuroscience investig...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253913</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253913</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Using Language to Navigate the Infant Mind</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253912&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01117.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]How do infants represent objects, actions, and relations in events? In this review, we discuss an approach to studying this question that begins with linguistic theory[mdash]specifically, semantic structures in language. On the basis of recent research exploring infant cognition and prominent linguistic analyses, we examine whether infants' representations of motion events are articulated in terms of the components proposed by Talmy (1985; e.g., path, manner) and whether infants' event representations are defined in terms of broad semantic roles (agent, patient, source, goal) as proposed by Jackendoff (1990) and Dowty (1991). We show how recent findings in infant cognition are consistent with the idea that the infant's representation of events is a close reflection of the li...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253912</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253912</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Impulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253911&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01116.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Though human beings embody a unique ability for planned behavior, they also often act impulsively. This insight may be important for the study of self-control situations in which people are torn between their long-term goals to restrain behavior and their immediate impulses that promise hedonic fulfillment. In the present article, we outline a dual-systems perspective of impulse and self-control and suggest a framework for the prediction of self-control outcomes. This framework combines three elements that, considered jointly, may enable a more precise prediction of self-control outcomes than they do when studied in isolation: impulsive precursors of behavior, reflective precursors, and situational or dispositional boundary conditions. The theoretical and practical utility o...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253911</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253911</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253910&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01115.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Taboo words are defined and sanctioned by institutions of power (e.g., religion, media), and prohibitions are reiterated in child-rearing practices. Native speakers acquire folk knowledge of taboo words, but it lacks the complexity that psychological science requires for an understanding of swearing. Misperceptions persist in psychological science and in society at large about how frequently people swear or what it means when they do. Public recordings of taboo words establish the commonplace occurrence of swearing (ubiquity), although frequency data are not always appreciated in laboratory research. A set of 10 words that has remained stable over the past 20 years accounts for 80% of public swearing. Swearing is positively correlated with extraversion and Type A hostility b...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253910</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253910</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Parental Divorce and Children's Adjustment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253909&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01114.x</link>
            <description>This article reviews the research literature on links between parental divorce and children's short-term and long-term adjustment. First, I consider evidence regarding how divorce relates to children's externalizing behaviors, internalizing problems, academic achievement, and social relationships. Second, I examine timing of the divorce, demographic characteristics, children's adjustment prior to the divorce, and stigmatization as moderators of the links between divorce and children's adjustment. Third, I examine income, interparental conflict, parenting, and parents' well-being as mediators of relations between divorce and children's adjustment. Fourth, I note the caveats and limitations of the research literature. Finally, I consider notable policies related to grounds for divorce, child...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253909</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253909</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Consequences of False Memories for Food Preferences and Choices</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253908&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01113.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]False memories, or memories for events that never occurred, have been documented in the real world and in the laboratory. In the real world, false memories involving trauma and abuse have resulted in real-life consequences. In the laboratory, researchers have just begun to study the consequences of false memories. We review this laboratory-based work and show how false memories for food-related experiences (e.g., becoming ill after eating egg salad) can lead to attitudinal and behavioral consequences (e.g., lowered self-reported preference for and decreased consumption of egg salad). (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253908</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253908</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A New Solution to the Recovered Memory Debate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253907&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01112.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The controversy regarding recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) has been characterized by two perspectives. According to one perspective, some people repress their memories of abuse because these experiences have been so emotionally traumatic, and they become capable of recalling the CSA only when it is psychologically safe to do so many years later. According to the other perspective, many reports of recovered memories of sexual abuse are false memories, often inadvertently fostered by therapists. In this article, we provide evidence for a third interpretation that applies to a subset of people reporting recollections of CSA; it does not require the concepts of repression, trauma, or false memory. These people did not experience their CSA as traumatic; they eit...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253907</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253907</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Relating Psychology and Neuroscience: Taking Up the Challenges</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2253906&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01111.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Advances in brain research have invigorated an ongoing debate about the relations between psychology and neuroscience. Cognitive science has historically neglected the study of neuroscience, although the influential subfield of cognitive neuroscience has since attempted to combine information processing approaches with an awareness of brain functioning. Although cognitive neuroscience does not necessarily support a reductionist approach, certain philosophers of mind have suggested that psychological constructs will eventually be replaced with descriptions of neurobiological processes. One implicitly popular response to this proposal is that neuroscience represents a level of implementation that is separate from a level of cognition. Although recent work in the philosophy of ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2253906</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2253906</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A New Approach to Reducing Disorder and Improving Well-Being</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139834&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01100.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Psychological science has usually approached the treatment of disorder through research on individual combinations of risk and protective factors (including life experiences, thinking styles, behaviors, social relationships and genes) and the application of interventions that focus on improvements in the individual. However, we can do better than this. Not only should we be aiming to enhance well-being rather than merely reducing disorder, but we should also be doing so for the majority of people rather than the few who have a disorder. In this article, I focus on the mental health spectrum and make the case for a broad population-based approach. I argue that a very small shift in the population mean of the underlying symptoms or risk factors can do more to enhance well-bein...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139834</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139834</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Impact of Racism on Ethnic Minority Mental Health</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139833&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01099.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]A problem in ethnic minority mental health that can be solved in the foreseeable future is understanding how subtle and covert forms of racism affect psychological health of racial minorities. Although scientific psychology has generated a large body of literature on racial prejudice, stereotypes, intergroup attitudes, and racial bias and their often implicit and automatic nature, relatively little is known about the effects of these subtle racial bias on minority individuals. Following a selective review of recent developments in experimental psychology and multicultural psychology, I suggest some promising approaches and opportunities for future integration that would advance the field. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139833</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139833</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Solving Social Problems Like a Psychologist</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139832&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01098.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]We suggest that psychologists can play a larger role in the solution of important social problems. Psychology brings two important qualities to the study of social problems: attention to psychological process and rigorous methodology. Our key task is to define social problems in part as psychological problems, and to conduct rigorous research that tests novel psychological solutions. Examples of research that has taken this path[mdash]research on race differences in academic performance, on the training of executive function and intelligence, and on the provision of socially constructive default decisions[mdash]are provided. We argue that addressing social problems can enrich our science by connecting psychologists to interdisciplinary teams and by providing contexts in whic...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139832</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139832</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Using New Interactive Media to Enhance the Teaching of Psychology (and Other Disciplines) in Developing Countries</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139831&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01096.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]My idea for improving psychology responds to the challenge of teaching psychology in lower income, developing countries. With new Web-based e-books on the horizon, I suggest harnessing the Internet to deliver state-of-the-art, interactive, low-cost, locally adapted content to students who cannot afford books. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139831</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139831</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recapturing a Context for Psychology: The Role of History</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139830&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01097.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]With the ever-increasing fragmentation of psychology into narrower subspecialties, the field devolves further and further into a focus on specialized knowledge, answering smaller questions and avoiding the larger and more meaningful ones. It is argued that specialized knowledge acquires its meaning only from an understanding of its place in a broader intellectual context. Psychology appears to have lost that context and perhaps the opportunity for a more significant role in modern science. An understanding of the history of psychological science offers a way to recapture that context and to prepare future psychologists to address the truly significant behavioral problems that face our world. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139830</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139830</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Learning for Life: An Ecological Approach to Pedagogical Research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139829&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01095.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The trend to convert laboratory findings on the conditions associated with optimal memory into recommendations for teaching strategies and learning aids will harm students if findings fail to generalize to students' usual learning environments. Moreover, it is likely that pedagogies function differently for students with different degrees of background knowledge, time, and interest in the subject matter; that some support activities will prevent students from honing their ability learn from narrative material without guided learning; and that an overuse of learning aids will tax students' ability to use them effectively. We contrast two approaches to developing pedagogy[mdash]memory first and pedagogical ecology[mdash]and explain how the human factors approach of pedagogical...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139829</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139829</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Problems, Pitfalls, and Promise in the Peer-Review Process: Commentary on Trafimow &amp; Rice (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139828&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01109.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]In their critique of the peer-review process, Trafimow and Rice (2009, this issue) dramatize a number of ways in which the review process can go awry. On the whole, I agree that the issues highlighted by the authors are indeed problems worthy of careful consideration. However, I fear that their treatment of these issues could send mixed and misleading messages to would-be reviewers about what constitutes proper reviewing behavior, in part because the authors had little to say on this topic. In the present commentary, I attempt to address this omission by discussing qualities of a good review and by distinguishing several responsibilities in the peer-review process that lie uniquely with the editor and the author. Finally, I identify three general strategies for improving the...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139828</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139828</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Are Social Scientists Harder on Their Colleagues Than Physical Scientists Were on Theirs in the Past? Commentary on Trafimow &amp; Rice (2009)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139827&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01108.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Trafimow and Rice (2009; this issue) have written a thought-provoking article that addresses an important issue in a creative, informative, and engaging way. In a series of vignettes, the authors imagine how several of the better known developments of science might have fared if the manuscripts in which they were first described had been assessed according to the standards and predilections of current reviewers of manuscripts in the social sciences. In this commentary, I note points made by Trafimow and Rice with which I agree, mention some questions that the article raises that are important in my view, challenge the authors' assumption that contemporary social scientists generally treat the ideas of their colleagues more harshly than past physical scientists treated those ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139827</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139827</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139826&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01107.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]One might question whether the great works in the history of science would get good reviews if subjected to the type of reviewing process to which psychologists are forced to submit their manuscripts. In some ways, behavioral scientists are too critical, and in other ways they are insufficiently so. To explore these issues, we imagine that great works from the history of nonsocial sciences were submitted for review in behavioral science journals and present simulated editor letters summarizing the comments of behavioral science reviewers. The philosophical underpinnings and justifications of the arguments are discussed, and recommendations for improved reviewing are offered. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139826</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139826</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Masked Reviews Are Not Fairer Reviews</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139825&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01102.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Many people believe that reviewers are less likely to produce unfair and biased reviews when they do not know the identity of the authors. However, there is surprisingly little evidence of such bias, there is little evidence that masked review is effective in addressing bias, and masked review has potential costs and drawbacks to the research community. More empirical work on the existence and nature of bias is needed. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139825</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139825</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Peer-Review and Editorial System: Ways to Fix Something That Might Be Broken</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139824&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01106.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The present article focuses on ways to make the peer-review and editorial process more efficient and more equitable for authors. In particular, we focus on the role of editors and action editors in the process of selecting and managing reviewers, balancing their own impressions of the manuscript with the reviewers' feedback, and rendering a fair and equitable editorial decision. We advance several recommendations to conserve reviewer time, provide authors with appropriate recourse when their papers are rejected unfairly, and expedite the processing of manuscripts that do not meet the standards of the journal to which they have been submitted. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139824</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139824</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Psychology of Referencing in Psychology Journal Articles</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139823&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01104.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Citation statistics can affect major professional decisions, but little is known about how important a particular reference is to the citing document. We asked 49 psychologists to rate the importance of every reference in their own empirical paper and to indicate the primary citation reason. References cited for conceptual ideas or to justify methods and data analyses were regarded as more important than references cited for general background, limitations, or future research. The location, frequency, and length of a citation predicted its importance, but such relationships were weaker for self-citations. We make suggestions about referencing for authors, editors, and bibliographic database designers. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139823</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139823</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139822&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01105.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Anonymous peer review has served as the bedrock of research dissemination in scientific psychology for decades and has only sporadically been questioned. However, other disciplines, such as biomedicine and physics, have found the traditional peer-review system to be wanting and have begun to test and try alternative practices. In this article, we survey criticisms of the traditional peer-review system and describe several alternatives in the interests of facilitating discussion and debate. We also consider why the natural sciences tend to employ fewer reviewers and have lower rejection rates than do the social sciences. Our two recommendations are that a serious discussion of problems and alternatives to peer review should be started at all levels of psychology and that a sc...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139822</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139822</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Publishing in Scientific Journals: We're Not Just Talking to Ourselves Anymore</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139821&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01101.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Increasingly, psychological research is part of the integrative science that spans multiple disciplines, but variable publication standards undermine some of the integrative progress that might otherwise be made. Word limits for articles, norms for shorter reviews (which would improve turnaround time), electronic availability, and appropriate marketing of research will bring psychology closer to the central role it could play in integrative science. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139821</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139821</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Publishing in the Psychological Sciences: Enhancing Journal Impact While Decreasing Author Fatigue</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139820&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01103.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The publication process in the psychological sciences is unduly tedious and would benefit from the adoption of a publishing model typical of the neurosciences and basic sciences. The author argues that such a change would result in higher impact publications in the psychological sciences and would also conserve the time of busy scientists. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139820</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139820</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What (and Where) Is the Ethical Code Concerning Researcher Conflict of Interest?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139819&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01086.x</link>
            <description>This article illustrates relationships that can create conflicts of interest for editors, grant decision makers, journal and grant reviewers, expert witnesses, and also for many researchers with method or theory commitments. The author urges psychology's professional associations to do what they now do either minimally or not at all: provide ethical guidelines that identify these conflicts and offer reasoned advice on managing them. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139819</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139819</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Institutional Review Boards: From Bane to Benefit</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139818&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01085.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Institutional review boards (IRBs) are primarily prevention-focused, avoiding damage to human subjects and averting ethical infractions, thereby protecting participants, researchers, and universities. Yet, the cost of prevention focus is simply avoiding negative outcomes and is enacted through control, risk-aversion, security, detail-orientation, reactivity, anxiety, avoidance, punishment, negative possibilities, and seizing on a single dominant solution. These endanger the research enterprise. An alternative promotion focus is more advantageous as it seeks positive outcomes and thus facilitating research, which is the IRB's second duty. This alternative guides recruiting and training of staff, panel, and researchers; orienting to and reinforcing promotion norms; creating we...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139818</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139818</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Do IRBs Pass the Minimal Harm Test?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139817&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01084.x</link>
            <description>We describe examples of institutional review board (IRB) actions that have delayed or thwarted research that could not conceivably be considered to pose more than minimal risk to participants. We propose three changes to improve the IRB process and reduce both human and financial costs. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139817</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139817</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Evidence-Based Ethical Problem Solving (EBEPS)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139816&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01087.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Although there is usually agreement about the ethical principles that should govern human research, there may be little agreement on how those principles should be interpreted into research procedures in some instances. Empirical research on ethical issues can often elucidate ways to improve on existing research practices and resolve debates with one's institutional review board. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139816</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139816</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>It's Time We Brought Introspection Out of the Closet</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139815&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01090.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]I identify the main reasons why introspection unofficially has been banned from the field for some 100 years, though it has been partly smuggled back in through the use of &quot;verbal (self-) reports.&quot; I then show why introspection is indispensable to psychology. I argue that this ban has retarded the progress of psychology by taking attention away from the problem of the accuracy of self-reports, limiting our understanding of concepts like emotion, discouraging psychologists from using introspection themselves, and ignoring the study of how to develop introspective skill. I conclude by suggesting some approaches to validating introspective reports. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139815</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139815</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Two Is Better Than One</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139814&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01092.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Psychologists too often rely on only one source of evidence to affirm the validity of a construct. However, they usually do not know all the conditions that can produce the evidence they gather. Hence, the inference is often limited to the data gathered and does not generalize to other categories of information. Examples of this habit are presented along with the suggestion that all social scientists should affirm the utility of their concepts with more than one class of information. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139814</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139814</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Can't We Be More Idiographic in Our Research?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139813&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01088.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Most psychological scientists make inferences about the relations among variables of interest by comparing aggregated data from groups of individuals. Although this method is unarguably a useful one that will continue to yield scientific advances, important limitations exist regarding the efficiency and flexibility of such designs, as well as with the generality of obtained results. Idiographic research strategies, which focus on the intensive study of individual organisms over time, offer a proficient and flexible alternative to group comparison designs; however, they are rarely taught in graduate training programs and are seldom used by psychological scientists. We highlight some of the unique strengths of idiographic methods, such as single case experimental designs, and ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139813</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139813</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Are the Brain Mechanisms on Which Psychological Processes Are Based?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139812&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01094.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]That the human brain is the organ of the mind is not in dispute, but we know remarkably little about the brain mechanisms underlying the mind. What are the functional structures and computational processes of the human brain that subserve cognition, emotion, and behavior? Given the complexity of the human brain, progress in understanding the functional organization and structure of the human brain depends on sophisticated theoretical specifications of the psychological representations and processes that differentiate two or more comparison conditions. Psychological scientists, therefore, are well positioned to lead the search for brain mechanisms underlying psychological processes. Doing so constitutes an expansion of the purview of psychological science beyond a science of ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139812</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139812</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Minimally Sufficient Research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139811&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01089.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Psychology would be improved if researchers stopped using complicated designs, procedures, and statistical analyses for the sole reason that they are able to do so. The present article reviews some of the classic studies in psychology, all of which are breathtakingly simple. The notion of minimally sufficient research is suggested as an ideal worth following. More generally, questions should dictate research methods and statistical analyses, not vice versa. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139811</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139811</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>We Have to Break Up</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139810&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01091.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Three mostly positive developments in academic psychology[mdash]the cognitive revolution, the virtual requirement for multiple study reports in our top journals, and the prioritization of mediational evidence in our data[mdash]have had the unintended effect of making field research on naturally occurring behavior less suited to publication in the leading outlets of the discipline. Two regrettable consequences have ensued. The first is a reduction in the willingness of researchers, especially those young investigators confronting hiring and promotion issues, to undertake such field work. The second is a reduction in the clarity with which nonacademic audiences (e.g., citizens and legislators) can see the relevance of academic psychology to their lives and self-interest, which...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139810</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139810</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Applying the Psychology of Science to the Science of Psychology: Can Psychologists Use Psychological Science to Enhance Psychology as a Science?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139809&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01093.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Added to the already tremendous diversity of subdisciplines of psychological science is the psychology of science. Although research on the psychology of science began in 1874, the field has seen a substantial expansion of activity in recent years. One particular subset of this research literature has special importance: namely, inquiries into the psychology of doing great science. These investigations may be assigned into four groups: cognitive, differential, developmental, and social. Each of these deal with critical questions that can, if answered, contribute directly to the improvement of psychology as a science. Potential applications include (a) the identification of scientific talent in psychology, (b) the education of future investigators in psychological science, an...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139809</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139809</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Improving Psychological Science</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2139808&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2009.01110.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2139808</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2139808</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Volume 3, 2008</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978373&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.volcontents_6.x</link>
            <description>(Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978373</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978373</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence: A New Look at the Old Question</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978372&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00096.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The idea that general intelligence may be more variable in males than in females has a long history. In recent years it has been presented as a reason that there is little, if any, mean sex difference in general intelligence, yet males tend to be overrepresented at both the top and bottom ends of its overall, presumably normal, distribution. Clear analysis of the actual distribution of general intelligence based on large and appropriately population-representative samples is rare, however. Using two population-wide surveys of general intelligence in 11-year-olds in Scotland, we showed that there were substantial departures from normality in the distribution, with less variability in the higher range than in the lower. Despite mean IQ-scale scores of 100, modal scores were ab...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978372</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978372</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Reply to Two Stylish Critiques: Response to Hunt (2008) and Mayer (2008)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978371&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00092.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]We reply to helpful critiques by Mayer (2008, this issue) and Hunt (2008, this issue) of our article on the role of styles of learning and thinking in instruction and assessment. We deal with issues of aptitude[ndash]treatment interaction, the range of variables important in instruction and assessment, the originality of our theories, overlap of our constructs with constructs in other theories, ethnic-group differences, and new data reported. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978371</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978371</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Applying the Theory of Successful Intelligence to Education&amp;#x2014;The Good, the Bad, and the Ogre: Commentary on Sternberg et al. (2008)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978370&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00094.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Sternberg, Grigorenko, and Zhang (2008) have presented a creative model for the application of research on intelligence and personality to education. There are many positive aspects of their effort. These include the coordination of individual differences in cognition and personality and their extension of the concept of intelligence beyond skills that can be tested in the normal testing paradigm. Although various parts of their approach have appeared elsewhere, the development of a single package containing all these ideas is a worthwhile improvement in thinking about education. They cite numerous studies in support of their efforts. However, a close examination of some of the major studies shows that this evidence, though not inconsistent with their claims, is not as stron...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978370</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978370</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Incorporating Individual Differences Into the Science of Learning: Commentary on Sternberg et al. (2008)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978369&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00093.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Sternberg, Grigorenko, and Zhang (2008, this issue) make a valiant effort to reinvigorate the somewhat dormant field of cognitive style by showing the implications of cognitive style for instruction and assessment. In support of their call to differentiate instruction for different kinds of learners, they summarize evidence showing that people learn better from a broad instructional method that is sensitive to multiple cognitive styles than they do from a narrow instructional method that is mainly addressed to one cognitive style. In support of their call for using multiple measures of learning potential, they summarize evidence showing that learning outcomes are better predicted by multiple measures of learning potential than by a single measure. In this commentary, I brief...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978369</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978369</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Styles of Learning and Thinking Matter in Instruction and Assessment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978368&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00095.x</link>
            <description>We describe one ability-based theory and one personality-based theory and present supporting data from multiple studies relevant to each. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978368</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978368</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Thought Speed, Mood, and the Experience of Mental Motion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978367&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00091.x</link>
            <description>This article presents a theoretical account relating thought speed to mood and psychological experience. Thought sequences that occur at a fast speed generally induce more positive affect than do those that occur slowly. Thought speed constitutes one aspect of mental motion. Another aspect involves thought variability, or the degree to which thoughts in a sequence either vary widely from or revolve closely around a theme. Thought sequences possessing more motion (occurring fast and varying widely) generally produce more positive affect than do sequences possessing little motion (occurring slowly and repetitively). When speed and variability oppose each other, such that one is low and the other is high, predictable psychological states also emerge. For example, whereas slow, repetitive thin...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978367</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978367</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Precedent in Law (and Elsewhere) is Not Totally (or Even Substantially) About Analogy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978366&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00090.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Cognitive scientists who conduct research on analogical reasoning often claim that precedent in law is an application of reasoning by analogy. In fact, however, law's principle of precedent, as well as the use of precedent in ordinary argument, is quite different. The typical use of analogy in law, including analogies to earlier decisions, involves retrieval of a source analog (or exemplar) from multiple candidates in order to help make the best decision now. But the legal principle of precedent requires that a prior decision be treated as binding even if the current decision maker disagrees with that decision. When the identity between a prior decision and the current question is obvious and inescapable, precedent thus imposes a constraint different from the effect of a typ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978366</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978366</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1978365&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00089.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Study habit, skill, and attitude inventories and constructs were found to rival standardized tests and previous grades as predictors of academic performance, yielding substantial incremental validity in predicting academic performance. This meta-analysis (N= 72,431, k= 344) examines the construct validity and predictive validity of 10 study skill constructs for college students. We found that study skill inventories and constructs are largely independent of both high school grades and scores on standardized admissions tests but moderately related to various personality constructs; these results are inconsistent with previous theories. Study motivation and study skills exhibit the strongest relationships with both grade point average and grades in individual classes. Academic...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1978365</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1978365</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rethinking Rumination</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1758439&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00088.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The response styles theory (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991) was proposed to explain the insidious relationship between rumination and depression. We review the aspects of the response styles theory that have been well-supported, including evidence that rumination exacerbates depression, enhances negative thinking, impairs problem solving, interferes with instrumental behavior, and erodes social support. Next, we address contradictory and new findings. Specifically, rumination appears to more consistently predict the onset of depression rather than the duration, but rumination interacts with negative cognitive styles to predict the duration of depressive symptoms. Contrary to original predictions, the use of positive distractions has not consistently been correlated with lower levels o...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1758439</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1758439</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Familiarity Breeds Attempts: A Critical Review of Dual-Process Theories of Recognition</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1758438&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00087.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Recognition memory and recall/recollection are the major divisions of the psychology of human memory. Theories of recognition have shifted from a &quot;strength&quot; approach to a dual-process view, which distinguishes between knowing that one has experienced an object before and knowing what it was. In this article, I discuss the history of this approach and the two processes of familiarity and recollection and locate their origin in pattern matching and organization. I evaluate various theories in terms of their basic requirements and their defining research and propose the extension of the original two process theory to domains such as pictorial recognition. Finally, I present the main phenomena that a dual-process theory of recognition must account for and discuss future needs an...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1758438</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1758438</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Television Viewing and Aggression: Some Alternative Perspectives</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1758437&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00086.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The focus of this article is on the examination of variables that moderate the influence of exposure to TV violence. The research on the relationship between TV violence and aggressive behavior of the audience has largely focused on addressing the social policy issue of whether witnessing TV violence fosters aggressive behavior in viewers, particularly children. There has been a dearth of research addressing the conditions that enhance the aggression stimulating effects of media violence, those that mitigate these effects, and those that may even result in reduced aggression after one witnesses media violence. To illustrate the importance of potential moderating factors, we present longitudinal correlational data relating the degree of viewing TV violence to various social b...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1758437</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1758437</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Explaining Away: A Model of Affective Adaptation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1758436&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00085.x</link>
            <description>We report tests of new predictions about people's reactions to pleasurable events and discuss the implications of the model for how people cope with negative events, experience emotion in different cultures, and other topics. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1758436</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1758436</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Theory of the Emergence, Persistence, and Expression of Geographic Variation in Psychological Characteristics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1758435&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00084.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Volumes of research show that people in different geographic regions differ psychologically. Most of that work converges on the conclusion that there are geographic differences in personality and values, but little attention has been paid to developing an integrative account of how those differences emerge, persist, and become expressed at the geographic level. Drawing from research in psychology and other social sciences, we present a theoretical account of the mechanisms through which geographic variation in psychological characteristics emerge and persist within regions, and we propose a model for conceptualizing the processes through which such characteristics become expressed in geographic social indicators. The proposed processes were examined in the context of theory ...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1758435</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1758435</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should Conflicts and How That Knowledge Can Help Us Reduce Short-Sighted Decision Making</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1612623&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00083.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Although observers of human behavior have long been aware that people regularly struggle with internal conflict when deciding whether to behave responsibly or indulge in impulsivity, psychologists and economists did not begin to empirically investigate this type of want/should conflict until recently. In this article, we review and synthesize the latest research on want/should conflict, focusing our attention on the findings from an empirical literature on the topic that has blossomed over the last 15 years. We then turn to a discussion of how individuals and policy makers can use what has been learned about want/should conflict to help decision makers select far-sighted options. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1612623</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1612623</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Do Sex, Twins, Spotted Hyenas, ADHD, and Sexual Orientation Have in Common?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1612622&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00082.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]The otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) measured in a collection of special populations of humans and certain nonhuman species suggest that OAEs may provide a window into some processes of human prenatal development and sexual differentiation. For reasons that are unclear, OAEs appear to be highly sensitive to events occurring during prenatal development that seem to be related to the degree of exposure to androgens a fetus receives. The (largely circumstantial) evidence for a relationship between androgen exposure and OAE strength comes from a series of studies of twins, children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, people of differing sexual orientations, and spotted hyenas, among others. Some conclusions are bolstered by parallel studies using auditory evoked potential...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1612622</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1612622</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cognitive Conceptualism&amp;#x2014;Where Have All the Affects Gone? Additional Corrections for Barrett et al. (2007)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1612621&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00081.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Barrett et al. (2007) claim that their approach to emotions covers more of the available evidence than does my affective neuroscience approach (Panksepp, 2007b). In fact, the weight of neurological evidence indicates that raw affect, as monitored by many behavioral tasks, is an aspect of the arousal of instinctual-emotional networks. This provides an empirical approach to understanding how primary-process emotional feelings are constituted by neural activities (Panksepp, 2008). There is abundant evidence for the existence of a variety of primal emotions shared across mammalian species that are biologically ingrained tools for living and learning and that may allow higher brain regions to conceptualize what is really important in the world. Barrett et al., misrepresent my vie...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1612621</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1612621</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Identifying Systematic Disobedience in Milgram's Obedience Experiments: A Meta-Analytic Review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1612620&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00080.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]A meta-analysis of data from eight of Milgram's obedience experiments reveals previously undocumented systematicity in the behavior of disobedient participants. In all studies, disobedience was most likely at 150 v, the point at which the shocked &quot;learner&quot; first requested to be released. Further illustrating the importance of the 150-v point, obedience rates across studies covaried with rates of disobedience at 150 v, but not at any other point; as obedience decreased, disobedience at 150 v increased. In contrast, disobedience was not associated with the learner's escalating expressions of pain. This analysis identifies a critical decision point in the obedience paradigm and suggests that disobedient participants perceived the learner's right to terminate the experiment as o...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1612620</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1612620</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1612619&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00079.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Replication is fundamental to science, so statistical analysis should give information about replication. Because p values dominate statistical analysis in psychology, it is important to ask what p says about replication. The answer to this question is &quot;Surprisingly little.&quot; In one simulation of 25 repetitions of a typical experiment, p varied from .44. Remarkably, the interval[mdash]termed a p interval[mdash]is this wide however large the sample size. p is so unreliable and gives such dramatically vague information that it is a poor basis for inference. Confidence intervals, however, give much better information about replication. Researchers should minimize the role of p by using confidence intervals and model-fitting techniques and by adopting meta-analytic thinking. (Sou...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1612619</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1612619</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981&amp;#x2013;2007)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1612618&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00078.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Until recently, it was widely held that happiness fluctuates around set points, so that neither individuals nor societies can lastingly increase their happiness. Even though recent research showed that some individuals move enduringly above or below their set points, this does not refute the idea that the happiness levels of entire societies remain fixed. Our article, however, challenges this idea: Data from representative national surveys carried out from 1981 to 2007 show that happiness rose in 45 of the 52 countries for which substantial time-series data were available. Regression analyses suggest that that the extent to which a society allows free choice has a major impact on happiness. Since 1981, economic development, democratization, and increasing social tolerance ha...</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1612618</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1612618</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Unlocking the Energy Dynamics of Executive Functioning: Linking Executive Functioning to Brain Glycogen</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1612617&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1111%252Fj.1745-6924.2008.00077.x</link>
            <description>ABSTRACT[mdash]Past work suggests that executive functioning relies on glucose as a depletable energy, such that executive functioning uses a relatively large amount of glucose and is impaired when glucose is low. Glucose from the bloodstream is one energy source for the brain, and glucose stored in the brain as glycogen is another. A review of the literature on glycogen suggests that executive functioning uses it in much the same way as glucose, such that executive functioning uses glycogen and is impaired when glycogen is low. Findings on stress, physical persistence, glucose tolerance, diabetes, sleep, heat, and other topics provide general support for this view. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1612617</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1612617</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Morality: An Evolutionary Account</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1421356&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6924.2008.00072.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 3, Page 149-172, May 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Refinements in Darwin's theory of the origin of a moral sense create a framework equipped to organize and integrate contemporary theory and research on morality. Morality originated in deferential, cooperative, and altruistic &quot;social instincts,&quot;... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1421356</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:47:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1421356</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Comparison of Models for Interstate Wars and for Individual Violence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1421359&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6924.2008.00075.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 3, Page 203-223, May 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—It is assumed that violence is functional at both individual and societal levels. A model developed for violent individuals is compared with a proposed model for interstate wars. In both domains, the data are consistent with the assumption that ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1421359</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:03:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1421359</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1421357&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6924.2008.00073.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 3, Page 173-192, May 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Fiction literature has largely been ignored by psychology researchers because its only function seems to be entertainment, with no connection to empirical validity. We argue that literary narratives have a more important purpose. They offer ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1421357</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:02:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1421357</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Blueprint for Social Cognitive Development</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1421358&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6924.2008.00074.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 3, Page 193-202, May 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—The field of social cognitive development (SCD) has historically failed to emerge as a dominant approach in developmental psychology. We take this opportunity to articulate the assumptions, goals, and contributions of SCD with the aim of ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1421358</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:02:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1421358</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hedonomics: Bridging Decision Research With Happiness Research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1421360&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6924.2008.00076.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 3, Page 224-243, May 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—One way to increase happiness is to increase the objective levels of external outcomes; another is to improve the presentation and choices among external outcomes without increasing their objective levels. Economists focus on the first method. ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1421360</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:02:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1421360</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>War and Peace: Possible Approaches to Reducing Intergroup Conflict</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1284074&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00066.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 2, Page 87-93, March 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—We discuss four potential ways to reduce conflict between groups: consideration of future consequences, independent leadership, outgroup empathy, and coordination. We review relevant empirical findings for each method and discuss how each can ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1284074</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:07:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1284074</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Affect and Cognition</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1284075&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00067.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 2, Page 94-101, March 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—One of the greatest puzzles of human nature concerns the poorly understood interplay between affect and cognition—the rational and emotional ways of dealing with the social world around us. Affect is a ubiquitous and powerful phenomenon in our ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1284075</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:00:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1284075</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Persuasion: From Single to Multiple to Metacognitive Processes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1284079&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00071.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>This article provides a brief overview of major developments in the history of contemporary persuasion theory. The first intuitive and empirical approaches to persuasion were guided by main-effect questions (e.g., are experts more persuasive ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1284079</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:00:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1284079</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1284076&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00068.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 2, Page 102-116, March 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Self-enhancement denotes a class of psychological phenomena that involve taking a tendentiously positive view of oneself. We distinguish between four levels of self-enhancement—an observed effect, an ongoing process, a personality trait, and an ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1284076</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:59:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1284076</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1284078&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00070.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 2, Page 126-136, March 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—We trace the rise, fall, and resurgence of political ideology as a topic of research in social, personality, and political psychology. For over 200 years, political belief systems have been classified usefully according to a single left–right (... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1284078</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:58:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1284078</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In Pursuit of Happiness: Empirical Answers to Philosophical Questions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1284077&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00069.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 2, Page 117-125, March 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—In this article, we provide an overview of what various philosophers throughout the ages have claimed about the nature of happiness, and we discuss to what extent psychological science has been able to substantiate or refute their claims. We ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1284077</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:57:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1284077</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Introduction to the Special Issue: From Philosophical Thinking to Psychological Empiricism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162222&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00055.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 1, January 2008. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162222</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:17:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162222</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Understanding the Vital Human Quest for Self-Esteem</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162228&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00061.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 48-55, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Authors have long noted the human penchant for self-esteem. Experimental research has revealed that this desire for self-esteem has wide-ranging effects on cognition, emotion, and behavior. Terror management theory explains that this desire for ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162228</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162228</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Heuristics Work</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162225&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00058.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 20-29, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—The adaptive toolbox is a Darwinian-inspired theory that conceives of the mind as a modular system that is composed of heuristics, their building blocks, and evolved capacities. The study of the adaptive toolbox is descriptive and analyzes the ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162225</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162225</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Innate Ideas Revisited. For a Principle of Persistence in Infants' Physical Reasoning</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162223&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00056.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 2-13, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—The notion of innate ideas has long been the subject of intense debate in the fields of philosophy and cognitive science. Over the past few decades, methodological advances have made it possible for developmental researchers to begin to examine ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162223</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162223</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Free Will in Scientific Psychology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162224&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00057.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 14-19, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Some actions are freer than others, and the difference is palpably important in terms of inner process, subjective perception, and social consequences. Psychology can study the difference between freer and less free actions without making ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162224</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162224</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Unconscious Mind</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162231&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00064.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 73-79, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—The unconscious mind is still viewed by many psychological scientists as the shadow of a &quot;real&quot; conscious mind, though there now exists substantial evidence that the unconscious is not identifiably less flexible, complex, controlling, ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162231</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162231</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Schizophrenia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162226&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00059.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 30-37, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Theoretical conceptualizations of schizophrenia have undergone significant change in the past century. Through the application of behavioral science methodology, psychologists have played a major role in the pivotal scientific advances that ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162226</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162226</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Love: What Is It, Why Does It Matter, and How Does It Operate?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162232&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00065.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 80-86, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Love is a perennial topic of fascination for scholars and laypersons alike. Whereas psychological science was slow to develop active interest in love, the past few decades have seen considerable growth in research on the subject, to the point ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162232</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162232</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Morality</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162230&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00063.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 65-72, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Moral psychology is a rapidly growing field with two principle lineages. The main line began with Jean Piaget and includes developmental psychologists who have studied the acquisition of moral concepts and reasoning. The alternative line began ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162230</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162230</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Fascination of Wisdom: Its Nature, Ontogeny, and Function</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162229&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00062.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 56-64, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Wisdom has intrigued both scholars and laypersons since antiquity. On the one hand, its seemingly ethereal yet obvious qualities are timeless and universal. On the other hand, these same qualities are evolving and responsive to historical and ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162229</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162229</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Language: A Toolbox for Sharing and Influencing Social Reality</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1162227&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2008.00060.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, Page 38-47, January 2008. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—The key role of language is often neglected in explicitly formulated theories of cognition, affect, and social behavior. Implicitly, though, the relationship between language and mind is at the heart of psychological science. Two major research ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1162227</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:28:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1162227</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038621&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00047.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 2, Issue 4, Page 313-345, December 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—The ability of personality traits to predict important life outcomes has traditionally been questioned because of the putative small effects of personality. In this article, we compare the predictive validity of personality traits with that of ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038621</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:18:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038621</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Optimum Level of Well-Being: Can People Be Too Happy?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038622&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00048.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 2, Issue 4, Page 346-360, December 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Psychologists, self-help gurus, and parents all work to make their clients, friends, and children happier. Recent research indicates that happiness is functional and generally leads to success. However, most people are already above neutral in ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038622</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038622</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Measuring the Immeasurable: Or &quot;Could Abraham Lincoln Take the Implicit Association Test?&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038627&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00052.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 2, Issue 4, Page 406-411, December 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—With the Association for Psychological Science's new ethical standards requiring that all research studies include an Implicit Association Test (IAT), forecasters predict that the population of new participants available to take IATs will ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038627</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038627</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Trio of Concerns</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038623&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00049.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 2, Issue 4, Page 361-376, December 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—This essay assesses the two most significant changes in psychology over the past century: the attempt to localize psychological phenomena in restricted brain sites and the search for genetic contributions to behavior and psychopathology. ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038623</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038623</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Volume 2, 2007</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038628&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00054.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 2, Issue 4, Page 412, December 2007. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038628</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038628</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Emotion Feelings Stem from Evolution and Neurobiological Development, Not From Conceptual Acts: Corrections for Barrett et al. (2007)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038626&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00053.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 2, Issue 4, Page 404-405, December 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Contrary to the arguments of Barrett et al. (2007) in critiquing Izard (2007), emotion feelings (the key component of human emotions) stem from evolution and neurobiological development, not from conceptual acts. Barrett et al. made several ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038626</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038626</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038625&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00051.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science, Volume 2, Issue 4, Page 396-403, December 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Psychology calls itself the science of behavior, and the American Psychological Association's current &quot;Decade of Behavior&quot; was intended to increase awareness and appreciation of this aspect of the science. Yet some psychological subdisciplines ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038625</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038625</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Proceeding From Observed Correlation to Causal Inference: The Use of Natural Experiments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1038624&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00050.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>This article notes five reasons why a correlation between a risk (or protective) factor and some specified outcome might not reflect environmental causation. In keeping with numerous other writers, it is noted that a causal effect is usually ... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1038624</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1038624</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Emotion Refinement: A Theory Inspired by Chinese Poetics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=834028&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00042.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 3, Page 227-241, Sep 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—William James made a distinction between coarse and noncoarse emotions. In the present article, we explore the nature of such noncoarse emotions, which we designate as emotions with refinement. We take our cue from the treatment of refined emoti... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=834028</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:19:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">834028</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Of Mice and Men: Natural Kinds of Emotions in the Mammalian Brain? A Response to Panksepp and Izard</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=834032&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00046.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 3, Page 297-312, Sep 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—For almost 5 decades, the scientific study of emotion has been guided by the assumption that categories such as anger, sadness, and fear cut nature at its joints. Barrett (2006a) provided a comprehensive review of the empirical evidence from the... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=834032</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:39:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">834032</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Neurologizing the Psychology of Affects: How Appraisal-Based Constructivism and Basic Emotion Theory Can Coexist</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=834031&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00045.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 3, Page 281-296, Sep 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Abundant neurobehavioral data, not discussed by Lisa Feldman Barrett (2006), support the existence of a variety of core emotional operating systems in ancient subneocortical regions of the brain (Panksepp, 1998a, 2005a). Such brain systems are t... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=834031</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:39:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">834031</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Basic Emotions, Natural Kinds, Emotion Schemas, and a New Paradigm</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=834030&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00044.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 3, Page 260-280, Sep 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Research on emotion flourishes in many disciplines and specialties, yet experts cannot agree on its definition. Theorists and researchers use the term emotion in ways that imply different processes and meanings. Debate continues about the nature... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=834030</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:39:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">834030</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ideal Affect: Cultural Causes and Behavioral Consequences</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=834029&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00043.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 3, Page 242-259, Sep 2007. 
		
	 ABSTRACT—Most research focuses on actual affect, or the affective states that people actually feel. In this article, I demonstrate the importance and utility of studying ideal affect, or the affective states that people ideally want to feel. First, I def... (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=834029</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:39:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">834029</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Social Neuroscience: Progress and Implications for Mental Health</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=678803&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00032.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 2, Page 99-123, Jun 2007. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=678803</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:15:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">678803</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reply to Commentators</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=678812&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00041.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 2, Page 224-226, Jun 2007. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=678812</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:03:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">678812</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Dynamical Systems Approach to the Development and Expression of Female Same-Sex Sexuality</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=678805&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00034.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 2, Page 142-161, Jun 2007. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=678805</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:03:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">678805</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Better, Stronger, Faster: Self-Serving Judgment, Affect Regulation, and the Optimal Vigilance Hypothesis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=678804&amp;cid=s_27178_36_f&amp;fid=27178&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackwell-synergy.com%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1111%2Fj.1745-6916.2007.00033.x%3Fai%3Dw4c%26af%3DR</link>
            <description>Perspectives on Psychological Science Volume 2, Issue 2, Page 124-141, Jun 2007. (Source: Perspectives on Psychological Science)</description>
            <author>Perspectives on Psychological Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=678804</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:03:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">678804</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
