<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm: Medical Ethics Research</title>
        <description>MedWorm.com provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 7000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest research in Medical Ethics</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/index.php/Medical-Ethics/74/?journals=1]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:10:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Stem cells: Back to the future</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7243858&amp;cid=d_74_26_f&amp;fid=23303&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.newscientist.com%2Fc%2F749%2Ff%2F10901%2Fs%2F2bfc7619%2Fl%2F0L0Snewscientist0N0Carticle0Cmg218291730B10A0A0Estem0Ecells0Eback0Eto0Ethe0Efuture0Bhtml0Dcmpid0FRSS0QNSNS0Q20A120EGLOBAL0Qhealth%2Fstory01.htm</link>
            <description>The unexpected return of therapeutic cloning could reopen ethical arguments that seemed to have been laid to rest&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (Source: New Scientist - Health)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>New Scientist - Health</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7243858</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 07:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7243858</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Terrorism and jihad in Indonesia: Questions and possible ways forward</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7245452&amp;cid=d_74_172_f&amp;fid=27192&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fajsp.12020</link>
            <description>We critically examine the three papers on terrorism and jihad in Indonesia contained in this issue. First, we argue that thorough discussion and definition of key terms (including religious violence and jihad) would have led to a much stronger framework for understanding the voices of the activists and their supporters. Second, the authors could have engaged more systematically with the international literature on intergroup relations and conflict to discuss how psychological and social processes of radicalization are similar or different in the Indonesian context. Third, we highlight methodological and ethical shortcomings in the three papers that call into question a number of the conclusions drawn by the authors. We outline future research questions and provide suggestions to strengthen...</description>
            <author>Asian Journal Of Social Psychology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7245452</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7245452</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical considerations for experiments involving elite athletes and &quot;doping&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7245552&amp;cid=d_74_68_f&amp;fid=33708&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjap.physiology.org%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Ffull%2F114%2F10%2F1362%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Journal of Applied Physiology)</description>
            <author>Journal of Applied Physiology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7245552</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7245552</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rehabilitation of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Critical Review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7239909&amp;cid=d_74_25_f&amp;fid=36866&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pedneur.com%2Farticle%2FPIIS0887899412005772%2Fabstract%3Frss%3Dyes</link>
            <description>Abstract: The purpose of this critical review of the English literature published between 1975 and 2009 was to assess the quality of the evidence for the efficacy of rehabilitation intervention after traumatic brain injury in children. “Evidence for intervention studies” was used to classify the research strength of design and report. Only a minority (16/439) of the published studies has been related to traumatic brain injury in children and has used a scientific or quasiscientific design. Only one study met the criteria of class I “evidence for intervention” studies. However, this study included adults, as well as children. The other 15 studies, although reporting positive results, had many methodologic deficiencies, and consequently their validity is questionable. Although the me...</description>
            <author>Pediatric Neurology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7239909</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:18:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7239909</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Initiation of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods (IUDs and implant) at pregnancy termination reduces repeat abortion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7243514&amp;cid=d_74_49_f&amp;fid=28855&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Febm.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F18%2F3%2Fe29%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Commentary on: Cameron S, Glasier A, Chen Z. Effect of contraception provided at termination of pregnancy and incidence of subsequent termination of pregnancy. BJOG 2012;119:1074&amp;ndash;80. Context Despite the availability of effective modern contraceptive methods, unplanned pregnancy continues to be a major problem worldwide. In 2008, the worldwide abortion rate was found to be 28/1000 women aged 15&amp;ndash;44, unchanged from 2003 rates of 29/1000 women.1 Immediate initiation of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods following pregnancy termination has been identified as an effective strategy to reduce repeat unintended pregnancy and abortion. Access to these LARC methods&amp;mdash;intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants&amp;mdash;continues to be problematic, especially in the setting ...</description>
            <author>Evidence-Based Medicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7243514</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7243514</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>'We do not see the lens through which we look': screening mammography evidence and non-financial conflicts of interest</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7243516&amp;cid=d_74_49_f&amp;fid=28855&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Febm.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F18%2F3%2F81%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>It has become clear that conflicts of interest can influence scientific judgement and reporting of research results in the medical literature.1 In this issue of EBM, Rasmussen et al2 studied citation of systematic reviews of breast cancer screening3&amp;ndash;5 that found smaller benefits and greater harms than did prior reviews. They then compared how the reviews were cited by general versus specialty journals. In most papers citing the reviews, the key, perhaps controversial, findings regarding overdiagnosis and breast cancer mortality were not discussed. But in those papers that did describe those findings, papers published in general medical journals were more likely than those published in specialty journals to explicitly agree with the findings about overtreatment and overdiagnosis, or t...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Evidence-Based Medicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7243516</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7243516</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Citations of scientific results and conflicts of interest: the case of mammography screening</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7243517&amp;cid=d_74_49_f&amp;fid=28855&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Febm.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F18%2F3%2F83%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Conclusions
Articles in specialty journals were more likely to explicitly reject results from the Cochrane reviews, and less likely to accept the results and methods, than articles in general medical journals. Several specialty journals are published by interest groups and some authors have vested interests in mammography screening. (Source: Evidence-Based Medicine)</description>
            <author>Evidence-Based Medicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7243517</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7243517</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7243518&amp;cid=d_74_49_f&amp;fid=28855&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Febm.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F18%2F3%2F90%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Increasing numbers of healthcare professionals are using smartphones and their associated applications (apps) in daily clinical care. While these medical apps hold great potential for improving clinical practice, little is known about the possible dangers associated with their use. Breaches of patient confidentiality, conflicts of interests and malfunctioning clinical decision-making apps could all negatively impact on patient care. We propose several strategies to enhance the development of evidence-based medical apps while retaining their open nature. The increasing use of medical apps calls for broader discussion across medicine's organising and accrediting bodies. The field of medical apps is currently one of the most dynamic in medicine, with real potential to change the way evidence-...</description>
            <author>Evidence-Based Medicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7243518</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7243518</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Opposite impacts of dietary versus supplemental calcium on cardiovascular health</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7243528&amp;cid=d_74_49_f&amp;fid=28855&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Febm.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F18%2F3%2F113%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Commentary on: Li K, Kaaks R, Linseisen J, et al.. Associations of dietary calcium intake and calcium supplementation with myocardial infarction and stroke risk and overall cardiovascular mortality in the Heidelberg cohort of the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition study (EPIC-Heidelberg). Heart 2012;98:920&amp;ndash;5. Context Calcium supplementation is widely used to maintain bone health. Growing data suggests that calcium supplementation, but not dietary calcium intake, may harm cardiovascular (CV) health.1 2 There is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) that addressed CV events as primary endpoints and such an RCT is unlikely to be conducted considering ethical issues.3 Methods The Heidelberg prospective cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer ...</description>
            <author>Evidence-Based Medicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7243528</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7243528</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review of the literature and commentary</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7238529&amp;cid=d_74_8_f&amp;fid=31817&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chiromt.com%2Fcontent%2F21%2F1%2F14</link>
            <description>This article will provide a narrative review of the MUA literature, followed by a commentary about the current lack of high quality research evidence, the anecdotal and consensus basis of existing clinical protocols, as well as related professional, ethical and legal concerns for the chiropractic practitioner. The limitations of the current medical literature related to MUA via conscious/deep sedation need to be recognized and used as a guide to clinical experience when giving consideration to this procedure. More research, in the form of controlled clinical trials, must be undertaken if this procedure is to remain a potential treatment option for chronic spine pain patients in the chiropractic clinical practice. (Source: Chiropractic and Osteopathy)</description>
            <author>Chiropractic and Osteopathy</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7238529</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7238529</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dental caries prevalence, oral health knowledge and practice among indigenous Chepang school children of Nepal.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7238604&amp;cid=d_74_11_f&amp;fid=34041&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomedcentral.com%2F1472-6831%2F13%2F20</link>
            <description>Conclusions:
Caries prevalence of 5--6 --year- old Chepang school children is above the recommended target set by FDI/WHO. The study reported 31% schoolchildren aged 8-16-year old suffered oral pain and decayed component constituted almost the entire dmft/DMFT index. The brushing habit was reportedly low with only 24% of the children brushing twice daily. A nationwide scientifically proven, cost effective school based interventions is needed for prevention and control of caries in schoolchildren in Nepal. (Source: BMC Oral Health - Latest articles)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>BMC Oral Health  - Latest articles</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7238604</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7238604</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Distraction by a monotube fixator to achieve limb lengthening: predictive factors for tibia trauma</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7239025&amp;cid=d_74_14_f&amp;fid=37190&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.traumamanagement.org%2Fcontent%2F7%2F1%2F3</link>
            <description>Conclusion:
Distraction by a monotube fixator appears effective in achieving correction &gt;38.0% original tibia lengthening following traumatic bone gap. Predictive factors for poor outcome were useful for prognostication. (Source: Journal of Trauma Management and Outcomes)</description>
            <author>Journal of Trauma Management and Outcomes</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7239025</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7239025</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Knowing, Caring, and Telehealth Technology: &quot;Going the Distance&quot; in Nursing Practice</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7240110&amp;cid=d_74_27_f&amp;fid=32323&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjhn.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F31%2F2%2F104%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The use of technology in delivery of health care services is rapidly increasing, and more nurses are using telehealth to provide care by distance to persons with complex health challenges. The rapid uptake of telehealth modalities and dynamic evolution of technologies has outpaced the generation of empirical knowledge to support nursing practice in this emerging field, specifically in relation to how nurses come to know the person and engage in holistic care in a virtual environment. Knowing the person and nursing care have historically been associated with physical presence and close proximity in the nurse&amp;ndash;client relationship, and the use of telehealth can limit the ways in which a nurse can observe the person, potentiate perceptions of distance, and lead to a reductionist perspecti...</description>
            <author>Journal of Holistic Nursing</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7240110</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7240110</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Attitudes and views of the general public towards research participation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7243554&amp;cid=d_74_49_f&amp;fid=28862&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fj.1445-5994.2011.02433.x</link>
            <description>ConclusionAttitudes of the public towards research participation are beleaguered by misconceptions. Stakeholders in clinical research must educate the general public regarding research methods and ethics. (Source: Internal Medicine Journal)</description>
            <author>Internal Medicine Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7243554</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7243554</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bullet point ethics as policy advice?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7245665&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=31005&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fbioe.12036</link>
            <description>(Source: Bioethics)</description>
            <author>Bioethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7245665</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7245665</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Limbic encephalitis: a clinician's guide</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7236720&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32763&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fep.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F3%2F91%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Cases of limbic encephalitis are being increasingly recognised by paediatric neurologists. As they usually present initially to paediatricians it is vital they are aware of the presentation, important investigations and management (table&amp;nbsp;1), as the prompt instigation of immunosuppression in the correct cases will prevent seizures and medial temporal lobe atrophy and significantly improve outcome. This is an excellent guide and includes some excellent MRI images with the various hippocamapl/temporal lobe changes.1 Key clinical features of limbic encephalitis: Cognitive, and particularly memory impairment  Temporal lobe seizures MRI signal change within limbic structures, particularly in the hippocampus. Competing interestsNone. Provenance and peer reviewCommissioned; internally peer re...</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood - Education and Practice</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7236720</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7236720</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Answers to Epilogue questions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7236727&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32763&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fep.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F3%2F119%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>From questions on page 92. Answers to question 1 2004&amp;mdash;Standard 4 in the National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services (Department of Health, 2004) 2006&amp;mdash;Transition: Getting it Right for Young People (Department of Health, 2006) 2007&amp;mdash;Aiming High for Disabled Children (AHDC): Better Support for Families (Department for Education, 2007) and A Transition Guide for All Services: Key Information for Professionals about the Transition Process for Disabled Children (Department of Health, 2007) 2007&amp;mdash;You're Welcome quality criteria (Department of Health, 2007) 2008&amp;mdash;Transition: Moving on Well (Department of Health, 2008) Answers to question 2 Fidelity, confidentiality, competency, honesty, a global perspective, non-judgemental approach, cont...</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood - Education and Practice</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7236727</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7236727</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Answers to Dermatophile questions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7236728&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32763&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fep.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F3%2F120%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>From questions on page 106. ANSWER TO Question 1 The answer is (D), kerion. This is a manifestation of tinea capitis, ringworm of the scalp. It can occur in more severe cases and in the very young, resulting in a boggy mass on the scalp with loss of hair. Diagnosis can be difficult as potassium hydroxide preparations can be negative in the presence of such inflammation; culture is frequently needed to prove scalp infection. Treatment must be in the form of an oral antifungal drug &amp;nbsp;indicated for tinea capitis for sufficient duration. Use of a topical antifungal shampoo is recommended concurrently to decrease spread of the disease.1 ANSWER TO Question 2 The answer is (A), alopecia areata. Alopecia areata is a common, usually patchy and often unpredictable hair loss on the scalp and the ...</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood - Education and Practice</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7236728</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7236728</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tension gastrothorax: a rare cause of breathlessness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7238955&amp;cid=d_74_14_f&amp;fid=28223&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Femj.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F30%2F6%2F500%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>A 67-year-old lady presented to the emergency department with a 4&amp;nbsp;day history of breathlessness for which she had started clarithromycin. She had a history of a hiatal hernia repair in 1996 and had recently started inhalers for presumed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Her pulse was 101&amp;nbsp;bpm, blood pressure 174/120&amp;nbsp;mm&amp;nbsp;Hg, respiratory rate 36 and O2 saturations 88% on air. She was clammy, dyspnoeic and auscultation of her chest revealed global wheeze. She was treated for an exacerbation of COPD. A chest radiograph showed a massive gastrothorax with mediastinal shift (figure 1). Attempts to pass a nasogastric tube were unsuccessful and she rapidly deteriorated, becoming drowsy, dropping her blood pressure to 108/60&amp;nbsp;mm&amp;nbsp;Hg and O2 saturations to 86% on ...</description>
            <author>Emergency Medicine Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7238955</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7238955</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An 80-year-old man with acute onset of right upper limb weakness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7238958&amp;cid=d_74_14_f&amp;fid=28223&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Femj.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F30%2F6%2F508%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>An 80-year-old man with a history of hypertension was referred under the suspicion of stroke. He suffered from acute onset of right upper limb weakness 4&amp;nbsp;h before presenting to our emergency department. He did not have dysarthria, facial palsy or positive pronator sign. But decreased right radial pulse and cold upper limb with cyanosis were noted. Emergent CT angiography was performed and revealed isolated spontaneous right subclavian artery dissection (figure 1A), which extended to axillary artery with compression of true lumen by thrombosed false lumen (figure 1B). He then received heparinisation treatment and the weakness of his right upper limb gradually recovered. Isolated spontaneous subclavian artery dissection is extremely rare.1 The initial clinical presentation is often misd...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Emergency Medicine Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7238958</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7238958</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>BET 3: In well-appearing children suspected of meningococcal disease can procalcitonin reduce the need for empiric antibiotic treatment?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7238964&amp;cid=d_74_14_f&amp;fid=28223&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Femj.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F30%2F6%2F515%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Report by: David Herd, CED Fellow Search checked by: Katie Cole Grimes, Specialty Registrar Institution: Starship Children's Hospital (Auckland, NZ), Manchester Royal Infirmary (UK) Abstract A short-cut review of the literature was carried out to establish whether the biological marker procalcitonin could safely rule out the diagnosis of meningococcal disease (MCD) in children. Using the below outlined search method and after the exclusion of the non-relevant papers, two were found to be relevant to the specific question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these are shown in table 3. The clinical bottom line is that the currently available evidence is not sufficient to support the sole use of pr...</description>
            <author>Emergency Medicine Journal</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7238964</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7238964</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Counselling for sight loss: Using systematic case study research to build a client informed practice model</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7240345&amp;cid=d_74_30_f&amp;fid=32286&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjvi.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F31%2F2%2F102%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>There is compelling evidence to suggest that acquired sight loss negatively impacts on emotional well-being. Despite increasing recognition of the need to provide emotional support for people with sight loss, we still do not fully understand what counselling interventions help and why they help. The aim of this study was to examine the process and outcome of counselling for a 70-year-old client who had experienced complete, irreversible, post-operative sight loss in order to gain a deeper understanding of client-defined helpful aspects of therapy. A Hermeneutic Single-Case Efficacy Design study was undertaken having received ethical approval from the University&amp;rsquo;s Research Ethics Committee. The client received six sessions of counselling from a vision-impaired counsellor working withi...</description>
            <author>British Journal of Visual Impairment</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7240345</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7240345</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Arabin cervical pessary in pregnant women at high‐risk of premature birth: an MR imaging observational follow‐up study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7241351&amp;cid=d_74_37_f&amp;fid=33691&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1002%252Fuog.12507</link>
            <description>ConclusionIn patients at high risk of premature delivery, correct placement of the Arabin cervical pessary should be immediately controlled, which can be easy and fast done with MRI. Our study provides some evidence that in singleton pregnancies with short cervix, cervical pessary delays birth by a mechanical effect on the utero‐cervical angle. (Source: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology)</description>
            <author>Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7241351</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7241351</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Evaluating the impact of a quality of life assessment with feedback for clinicians in patients with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7231746&amp;cid=d_74_172_f&amp;fid=39385&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpubmed%2F23661768%3Fdopt%3DAbstract</link>
            <description>CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life feedback positively influences patient satisfaction, which confirms the relevance of measuring QoL in clinical practice. The absence of a significant effect of QoL feedback on clinical outcomes also suggests that clinicians did not use these data optimally. Our findings suggest a nocebo effect of QoL assessment without feedback that should be considered by researchers and clinicians.
    PMID: 23661768 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] (Source: The British Journal of Psychiatry for Mental Science)</description>
            <author>The British Journal of Psychiatry for Mental Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7231746</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 11:56:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7231746</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Changes in capacity to consent over time in patients involved in psychiatric research.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7231748&amp;cid=d_74_172_f&amp;fid=39385&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpubmed%2F23661766%3Fdopt%3DAbstract</link>
            <description>CONCLUSIONS: Informed consent may be most effectively construed as an ongoing dialogue with participants at each study visit.
    PMID: 23661766 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] (Source: The British Journal of Psychiatry for Mental Science)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>The British Journal of Psychiatry for Mental Science</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7231748</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 11:56:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7231748</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: Preliminary experience</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7231016&amp;cid=d_74_31_f&amp;fid=34570&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thebonejournal.com%2Farticle%2FPIIS8756328213001075%2Fabstract%3Frss%3Dyes</link>
            <description>Conclusion: DTI-1H-MRS protocol performed in femoral neck seems to be highly sensitive and specific in identifying healthy subjects.A MR exam is more expensive when compared to a DXA investigation. However, even though DXA BMD evaluation has been the accepted standard for osteoporosis diagnosis, DXA result has a low predictive value on patients' risk for future fractures. Thus, new approaches for examining patients at risk for developing osteoporosis would be desirable.Preliminary results showed here suggest that future studies on a larger population based on DTI assessment in the femoral neck, in combination with 1H-MRS investigations, might allow screening of high-risk populations and the establishment of cut-off values of normality, with potential application of the method to single sub...</description>
            <author>Bone</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7231016</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 04:10:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7231016</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Produce Industry s Food Safety Push Takes Toll on the Environment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7234894&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=33714&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Dproduce-industry-food-safety-push-toll-environment</link>
            <description>Clean greens are healthy greens. [More] (Source: Scientific American - Official RSS Feed)</description>
            <author>Scientific American - Official RSS Feed</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7234894</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 22:41:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7234894</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>'Sometimes I want to play by myself': Understanding what friendship means to children with autism in mainstream primary schools</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7230195&amp;cid=d_74_25_f&amp;fid=32199&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Faut.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F17%2F3%2F296%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Research has shown that friendship impacts the overall experience of mainstream school for autistic children. Using a unique combination of quantitative, qualitative and social network methods, we investigated the extent and nature of autistic children&amp;rsquo;s friendships from their perspective and from those of their mothers, teachers and classroom peers. Consistent with previous research, children with autism (n = 12), aged between 9 and 11 years, rated their friendships to be of poorer quality than their non-autistic classroom peers (n = 11). There was, however, much variability in autistic children&amp;rsquo;s ratings, which, unexpectedly, was related to neither children&amp;rsquo;s cognitive ability nor their theory of mind ability. Encouragingly, the children generally reported satisfaction ...</description>
            <author>Autism</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7230195</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7230195</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Piloting the 'Children's acceptability of oral formulations (CALF) medicines survey to determine perceptions and practices with paediatrics medicines</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7227364&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32752&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fadc.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F6%2Fe1-ao%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Conclusions
This study supports the importance of eliciting children's unique perspectives relative to medicines use and acceptability. It also highlights that children and their parents/carers often manipulate dosage forms to aid administration; the frequency and clinical significance of these should be further evaluated. The questionnaires appear fit for purpose in relation to the capabilities of respondents, and show promise for the next stage of larger-scale data collection. (Source: Archives of Disease in Childhood)</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7227364</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7227364</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Adherence of paediatric nurses to double checking process steps during medication administration in a children's hospital: an observational study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7227365&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32752&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fadc.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F6%2Fe1-ap%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Conclusions
There was a variation between paediatric nurses adherence to double checking steps during medication administration. Independent double checks were not apparent for all steps in practice. The majority of medication administration errors observed failed to be prevented by the double checking process. (Source: Archives of Disease in Childhood)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7227365</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7227365</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethanol intake of paediatric intensive care patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7227377&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32752&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fadc.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F6%2Fe1-m%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Conclusions
Polypharmacy in PICU patients increases the exposure to alcohol. Some commercially available medicines provide excessive ethanol intake, providing the clinician with ethical, potentially economical dilemmas of prescribing an unlicensed medicine to minimise ethanol exposure. Further research is required to evaluate the scope of the problem, effects of exposure and provision of alcohol free formulations. (Source: Archives of Disease in Childhood)</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7227377</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7227377</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Two years experience of the treatment of molybdenum cofactor deficiency</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7227382&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32752&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fadc.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F6%2Fe1-r%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Conclusions
Until recently the provision of care to children with MOCD has largely been palliative. The experience in these two children suggest that the longer term treatment of the disease is possible and that near normal development can be possible in a disease that was previously fatal.
The ongoing use of cPMP in these patients presents some challenges in supply of a product appropriate for use. (Source: Archives of Disease in Childhood)</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7227382</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7227382</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Characteristics influencing location of death for children with life-limiting illness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7227399&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32752&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fadc.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F6%2F419%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Conclusions
Most children in New Zealand with a life-limiting illness die in hospital with a significant influence resulting from ethnic background, diagnosis and referral to the PPC service. These findings have implications for resourcing PPC services and end-of-life care. (Source: Archives of Disease in Childhood)</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7227399</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7227399</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7227414&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32752&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fadc.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F98%2F6%2F468-a%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Getting it straight from the start For&amp;nbsp; more than a decade Archimedes has presented clinical queries and appraised the evidence that emerges, leading on to a clinical conclusion to the dilemma. What is strikingly common is that many questions can start in a muddle, and a failure to get an &amp;lsquo;evidence-based answer&amp;rsquo; might actually be a failure to ask an accurate question. In a recent trans-disciplinary teaching session, one anaesthetist summarised the formulation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) questions as &amp;lsquo;Does drug A compared to drug B make outcome X happen more or less in patient group Z?&amp;rsquo;&amp;mdash;a brilliant anagram of the &amp;lsquo;PICO&amp;rsquo; formula into Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Patients. Now if your question doesn't fit, or can be fudged to fit, this...</description>
            <author>Archives of Disease in Childhood</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7227414</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7227414</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How the observed create ethical dilemmas for the observers: Experiences from studies conducted in clinical settings in the UK and Australia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7230540&amp;cid=d_74_27_f&amp;fid=32336&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fnhs.12052</link>
            <description>In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with p...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Nursing and Health Sciences</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7230540</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7230540</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>‘Be our guest’: challenges and benefits of using ‘family conversations’ to collect qualitative data about infant feeding and parenting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7230554&amp;cid=d_74_27_f&amp;fid=32348&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fjocn.12224</link>
            <description>ConclusionsBeing able to balance the needs of the researcher and the research participants is an important challenge that is a core component of conducting ethical research.
Relevance to clinical practiceThis paper highlights the viability of ‘family conversations’ as a data collection method for midwifery and nursing research and the need for midwives and child and family health nurses to more actively engage with a woman's support network with education and other strategies to assist in creating an environment for new mothers that is conducive to the continuation of breastfeeding and thriving as a mother. (Source: Journal of Clinical Nursing)</description>
            <author>Journal of Clinical Nursing</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7230554</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7230554</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Image‐directed, tissue‐preserving focal therapy of prostate cancer: a feasibility study of a novel deformable mr‐us registration system</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7234122&amp;cid=d_74_47_f&amp;fid=32576&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fbju.12223</link>
            <description>ConclusionNon‐rigid MR‐US registration is feasible, efficient and can locate lesions on ultrasound.The process has potential for improved accuracy of focal treatments, and improved diagnostic sampling strategies for prostate cancer.Further work on whether deformable MR‐US registration impacts on efficacy is required. (Source: BJU International)</description>
            <author>BJU International</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7234122</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7234122</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Nutrition labelling and the choices logo in Israel: positions and perceptions of leading health policy makers</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7240245&amp;cid=d_74_28_f&amp;fid=32628&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fjhn.12050</link>
            <description>ConclusionsThe results of the present study highlight the importance of a need for an integrated programme of nutrition promotion, including the use of social marketing based on a cooperative effort between the food industry, regulators and professionals, to recommend changes and adjustments in nutritional front of package labelling with the aim of promoting healthier nutrition consumption. (Source: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7240245</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7240245</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Prevalence of rotavirus and adenovirus associated with diarrhea among displaced communities in Khartoum, Sudan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7229856&amp;cid=d_74_20_f&amp;fid=37207&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomedcentral.com%2F1471-2334%2F13%2F209</link>
            <description>Conclusions:
In conclusion, most cases of viral diarrhea are found to be caused by rotavirus especially among children less than five years. Most of the identified rotavirus belonged to type A (VP6).It was also evident that most patients are those who drank untreated water obtained from donkey carts source and who had no access to latrines, and lived in poor environmental conditions would acquire diarrheal infection. (Source: BMC Infectious Diseases)</description>
            <author>BMC Infectious Diseases</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7229856</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7229856</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rose Gardener's disease</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7233100&amp;cid=d_74_40_f&amp;fid=28723&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthorax.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F68%2F6%2F602%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>A 32-year-old man worked as a subsistence farmer raising pigs and tending his small garden; he also kept cats and dogs. He reported fever, night sweats, weight loss of 10&amp;nbsp;kg over 3&amp;nbsp;months, haemoptysis and skin ulcers (figure 1). Radiography and chest CT scan (figure 2) showed extensive bilateral cavities. An HIV test was negative. Bronchoalveolar lavage and biopsy of the skin lesions displayed Sporothrix schenckii. He was treated with amphotericin B and his lesions slowly healed. Sporotrichosis is a chronic pyogranulomatous infection caused by a dimorphic fungus that contaminates skin or subcutaneous tissue after trauma with plant materials such as thorns or splinters, or through cat scratches or bites.1&amp;ndash;3 The term &amp;lsquo;Rose Gardener's disease&amp;rsquo; has been coined follo...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Thorax</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7233100</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7233100</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Foot orthoses for the management of low back pain: a qualitative approach capturing the patient's perspective</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7226040&amp;cid=d_74_71_f&amp;fid=38187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jfootankleres.com%2Fcontent%2F6%2F1%2F17</link>
            <description>Conclusion:
Clinicians need to adopt 'psychologically informed practice' in relation to the provision of foot orthoses. Likewise, researchers should consider all the influencing factors found in this study, both in relation to their study protocol and the outcomes they plan to measure. (Source: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research)</description>
            <author>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7226040</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7226040</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ars Brevis [ART OF ONCOLOGY]</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7228209&amp;cid=d_74_6_f&amp;fid=31124&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjco.ascopubs.org%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F31%2F14%2F1792%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>(Source: Journal of Clinical Oncology)</description>
            <author>Journal of Clinical Oncology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7228209</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7228209</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Delays in updates to ethics guidelines for research spark concern</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7229997&amp;cid=d_74_22_f&amp;fid=30445&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.nature.com%2F%7Er%2Fnm%2Frss%2Fcurrent%2F%7E3%2F3FkyWHUzWTc%2Fnm0513-511</link>
            <description>Nature Medicine 19, 511 (2013). 
      doi:10.1038/nm0513-511

Author: Alla Katsnelson (Source: Nature Medicine)</description>
            <author>Nature Medicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7229997</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7229997</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Foot orthoses for the management of low back pain: a qualitative approach capturing the patient¿s perspective</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7245622&amp;cid=d_74_71_f&amp;fid=38187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jfootankleres.com%2Fcontent%2F6%2F1%2F17</link>
            <description>Conclusion:
Clinicians need to adopt ‘psychologically informed practice’ in relation to the provision of foot orthoses. Likewise, researchers should consider all the influencing factors found in this study, both in relation to their study protocol and the outcomes they plan to measure. (Source: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research)</description>
            <author>Journal of Foot and Ankle Research</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7245622</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7245622</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Johnson &amp; Johnson Removes Some Chemicals from Baby Shampoo, Other Products</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7224869&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=33714&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Djohnson-and-johnson-removes-some-chemicals-from-baby-shampoo-other-products</link>
            <description>At a small ceremony in February, Johnson &amp; Johnson executives were handed a scroll of 30,000 signatures from consumers. [More] (Source: Scientific American - Official RSS Feed)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Scientific American - Official RSS Feed</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7224869</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:15:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7224869</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Chemicals of High Concern Found in Thousands of Children's Products</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7224870&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=33714&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Dchemicals-of-high-concern-found-in-thousands-of-childrens-products</link>
            <description>Cobalt in plastic building blocks and baby bibs. Ethylene glycol in dolls. Methyl ethyl ketone in clothing. Antimony in high chairs and booster seats. Parabens in baby wipes. D4 in baby creams. [More] (Source: Scientific American - Official RSS Feed)</description>
            <author>Scientific American - Official RSS Feed</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7224870</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7224870</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Managing Risk and Marginalizing Identities: On the Society-of-Captives Thesis and the Harm of Social Dis-Ease</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7221592&amp;cid=d_74_36_f&amp;fid=27144&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fijo.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F57%2F6%2F672%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article develops the constitutive features of the society-of-captives thesis as suggested by Arrigo and Milovanovic, and Arrigo, Bersot, and Sellers. The relevance of this thesis is briefly explored in relation to the institutional and community-based treatment philosophies that currently inform the mental health and criminal justice systems. This exploration specifies how risk (being human and doing humanness differently) is managed symbolically, linguistically, materially, and culturally. The management of this risk extends to the kept as well as to their keepers, regulators, and watchers (i.e., the society of captives). This article calls for a new clinical praxis (being/doing a critical mindfulness) designed to overcome the totalizing madness (the harm of social dis-ease) that fol...</description>
            <author>International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7221592</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7221592</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Captivity, Citizenship, and the Ethics of Otherwise in the Society-of-Captives Thesis: A Commentary on Arrigo</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7221593&amp;cid=d_74_36_f&amp;fid=27144&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fijo.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F57%2F6%2F694%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In this engagement with Professor Bruce Arrigo&amp;rsquo;s psychological jurisprudence model, I explore his critique of captivity and risk management. I am particularly interested in his claims that incarceration culminates in society&amp;rsquo;s own captivity, that the most destructive aspect of captivity is its foreclosing of human difference and potentiality, and that a praxis that is both clinical and mindful might point a way out. By way of a case anecdote, I interrogate several of the key terms in Arrigo&amp;rsquo;s formulation&amp;mdash;citizenship, reform, revolution, and praxis&amp;mdash;in an effort to further conjugate from the ground up such an innovative and important set of possibilities. (Source: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology)</description>
            <author>International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7221593</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7221593</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Moral Strangers and Moral Acquaintances: How to Conduct Professional Relationships in a Society of Captives: A Commentary on Arrigo</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7221594&amp;cid=d_74_36_f&amp;fid=27144&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fijo.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F57%2F6%2F703%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In this article, I examine Bruce Arrigo&amp;rsquo;s target article and the implications of his thesis that the mental health and criminal justice systems marginalize vulnerable individuals through a variety of symbolic and discursive practices. In particular, I direct my attention to the problem of value pluralism and how it can create problems communicating across different moral communities. I apply the insights of relational ethics and the concept of moral acquaintanceship in an attempt to bridge this gap. I then discuss the implications of this framework for Arrigo&amp;rsquo;s thesis and a story written by Amy Johnson describing the devastating effects of abuse, racism, and illness on a person of color. (Source: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology)</description>
            <author>International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7221594</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7221594</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Protocol: does sodium nitrite administration reduce ischaemia-reperfusion injury in patients presenting with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction? Nitrites In Acute Myocardial Infarction (NIAMI)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7222016&amp;cid=d_74_39_f&amp;fid=32101&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.translational-medicine.com%2Fcontent%2F11%2F1%2F116</link>
            <description>This study is funded by a grant from the UK Medical Research Council. This protocol is approved by the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee and has also received clinical trial authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (EudraCT number : 2010-023571-26).Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01388504; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01388504 and Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN57596739 (Source: Journal of Translational Medicine)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Translational Medicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7222016</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7222016</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical Amendments to the Israeli Organ Transplant Law</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7226050&amp;cid=d_74_73_f&amp;fid=32950&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1111%252Fajt.12240</link>
            <description>(Source: American Journal of Transplantation)</description>
            <author>American Journal of Transplantation</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7226050</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7226050</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patient and carer views on participating in clinical trials for prodromal Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7229376&amp;cid=d_74_18_f&amp;fid=33638&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1002%252Fgps.3958</link>
            <description>ConclusionsThe priorities of patients might be different to clinicians and those who design and regulate clinical trials. Patient views can be used to inform the ethical debate around the disclosure of biomarker status, the design of clinical trials and the content of trial information. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. (Source: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry)</description>
            <author>International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7229376</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7229376</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In silico study of the haemodynamic effects induced by mechanical ventilation and biventricular pacemaker</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217953&amp;cid=d_74_79_f&amp;fid=35480&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cmpbjournal.com%2Farticle%2FPIIS016926071300062X%2Fabstract%3Frss%3Dyes</link>
            <description>Abstract: In silico modeling of the cardiovascular system (CVS) can help both in understanding pharmacological or pathophysiological process and in providing information which could not be obtained by means of traditional clinical research methods due to practical or ethical reasons. In this work the numerical CVS was used to study the effect of interaction between mechanical ventilation and biventricular pacemaker by haemodynamic and energetic point of view. Starting from literature data on patients with intra and/or inter-ventricular activation time delay and treated using biventricular pacemaker, we used in silico simulator to analyse the effects induced by mechanical ventilatory assistance (MVA). After reproducing baseline and CRT conditions, the MVA was simulated changing the mean int...</description>
            <author>Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217953</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 04:10:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217953</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>[Policy Forum] Research Ethics: Global Research Integrity Training</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7215488&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=30175&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencemag.org%2Fcontent%2F340%2F6132%2F552.full%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Globalization of responsible conduct of research training should be grounded on shared professional standards.Author: Nicholas H. Steneck (Source: Science: Current Issue)</description>
            <author>Science: Current Issue</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7215488</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 07:10:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7215488</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217354&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=31003&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.biomedcentral.com%2F1472-6939%2F14%2F19</link>
            <description>Conclusions:
Conflicts of interest were common, but disclosures were very rare. Most guidelines did not describe how they were developed and many did not describe the evidence behind specific recommendations. Publicly available disclosure lists may assist guideline issuing bodies in ensuring that all conflicts are disclosed. (Source: BMC Medical Ethics)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>BMC Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217354</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217354</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A multi-center study on the regenerative effects of erythropoietin in burn and scalding injuries: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7220514&amp;cid=d_74_22_f&amp;fid=34098&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trialsjournal.com%2Fcontent%2F14%2F1%2F124</link>
            <description>DiscussionWe are seeking new insights into the mechanisms of wound healing in thermally injured patients and more detailed information about the role EPO plays, specifically in these complex interactions. We additionally expect that the biomimetic effects of EPO will be useful in the treatment of acute thermal dermal injuries.Trial registration: EudraCT Number: 2006-002886-38, Protocol Number: 0506, ISRCT Number: http://controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN95777824/ISRCTN95777824. (Source: Trials)</description>
            <author>Trials</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7220514</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7220514</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lead Poisoning Comes to the Remote Amazon</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7215542&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=33714&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Dlead-poisoning-comes-to-the-remote-amazon</link>
            <description>Inside the simple wood-frame house, a 6-year-old boy plays with a piece of malleable metal, biting it as his younger sister watches. In the background, piled against the wall, are two long strips of the metal &amp;ndash; lead sheathing from an electrical cable that the family sold for scrap. [More] (Source: Scientific American - Official RSS Feed)</description>
            <author>Scientific American - Official RSS Feed</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7215542</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 16:10:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7215542</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>News from the Front in War on Cancer--Mission Not Accomplished</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7215550&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=33714&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Dnews-from-cancer-war</link>
            <description>Janet Rowley noticed something odd about the glowing chromosomes revealed by her microscope. It was the early 1970s, the first years of the so-called &amp;quot; war on cancer ,&amp;quot; and she was using a new staining technique to examine cells from patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), a cancer of the blood that was almost always fatal. The technique highlighted bands within the chromosomes, and she could see an extra piece on the end of chromosome 9. That fragment was nearly the same size as a &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; chunk of chromosome 22 that other researchers had detected a decade earlier. To Rowley, it looked as if the tips of these two chromosomes had swapped places, or translocated. During the next few years she found two other cases of chromosomal translocation in different form...</description>
            <author>Scientific American - Official RSS Feed</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7215550</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7215550</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Metapsychology, epistemology and ethics of clinical psychoanalysis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7211953&amp;cid=d_74_36_f&amp;fid=37491&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scielo.br%2Fscielo.php%3Fscript%3Dsci_arttext%26pid%3DS1413-73722012000300003%26lng%3Den%26nrm%3Diso%26tlng%3Den</link>
            <description>Cet article traite de la différence entre la psychotérapie et la psychanalyse et analyse les objectifs respectifs des deux méthodes, en se référant à la théorie de la séduction généralisée de Jean Laplanche, ansi qu'au projet d'émancipation que cette théorie confère à la psychanalyse. Il fait valoir qu'il existe un rapport très étroit entre la théorie et la pratique en psychacanalyse, cela signifie que la pratique implique toujours le choix d'un modèle métapsychologique. L'article soutient par ailleurs que tous les modèles ne sont pas équivalents quant à leur conception de la transformation, objectif inhérent tout-à-fait à la pratique de la psychanalyse.O presente artigo analisa as diferenças entre psicoterapia e psicanálise e situa o quadro e os respectivos obj...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Psicologia em Estudo</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7211953</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 09:15:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7211953</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The protective shield and the Paraskeuê</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7211958&amp;cid=d_74_36_f&amp;fid=37491&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scielo.br%2Fscielo.php%3Fscript%3Dsci_arttext%26pid%3DS1413-73722012000300008%26lng%3Den%26nrm%3Diso%26tlng%3Den</link>
            <description>A noção de paraexcitações (Reizschutz), tal como formulada por Freud, tem forte viés biológico. É possível re-escrevê-la, a partir da teoria da sedução generalizada de Jean Laplanche, mostrando sua constituição nas relações originárias com o outro. O exame da literatura sobre a noção mostra claramente a dimensão ética e estética desse conceito. Autores relacionam condutas tais como a anorexia, a toxicomania, a hipocondria e a conduta criminosa como resultado da má constituição do paraexcitações. Nesse sentido, é possível aproximar o conceito da noção grega Paraskeuê, um escudo moral produzido ao longo da vida, tal como foi estudado por Michel Foucault. Conclui-se ser desejável re-escrever o conceito, integrando-o à história das práticas do cuidado de si p...</description>
            <author>Psicologia em Estudo</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7211958</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 09:15:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7211958</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Letter to the Editor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7211346&amp;cid=d_74_31_f&amp;fid=38549&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thekneejournal.com%2Farticle%2FPIIS0968016013000549%2Fabstract%3Frss%3Dyes</link>
            <description>We write to express our significant reservations regarding the article by Yanhui Jia and colleagues, “Anatomic proximity of the peroneal nerve to the posterolateral corner of the knee determined by MR imaging,” (The Knee 19 (2012) 766–768). This subject matter has been of significant interest to us for the past decade, and we have previously published on the same subject . Therefore, we were initially very interested to review the authors' paper. However, we very quickly recognized important ethical and scientific concerns regarding their work. (Source: The Knee)</description>
            <author>The Knee</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7211346</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 04:11:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7211346</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Plagiarism in medical literature</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7211345&amp;cid=d_74_31_f&amp;fid=38549&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thekneejournal.com%2Farticle%2FPIIS0968016013000537%2Fabstract%3Frss%3Dyes</link>
            <description>The editors have recently dealt with the issue of potential plagiarism in a case where the intent was innocent but the appearance was that of claiming another colleague's work. We believe that scientific progress and evolution like many human endeavors, requires taking from what is known and then improving upon that understanding. So many great ideas, patents and works have been subtle but with brilliant twists or enlightenments of a basic idea. However, the ethical issue arises when that work is claimed by another in print, without due recognition of the source. We believe that there is no place for this problem in our journal and will use measures at our disposal in the electronic publishing realm to identify a discrepancy. This places the onus upon the authors to make absolutely certain...</description>
            <author>The Knee</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7211345</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 04:11:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7211345</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An evaluation of Croi MyAction community lifestyle modification programme compared to standard care to reduce progression to diabetes/pre-diabetes in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7220517&amp;cid=d_74_22_f&amp;fid=34098&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trialsjournal.com%2Fcontent%2F14%2F1%2F121</link>
            <description>Background:
Universal screening using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria has identified a prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) of 12.4% in women living in Ireland. Women with prior GDM are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. A number of risk factors linked to the development of type 2 diabetes are potentially modifiable through lifestyle and behaviour changes, and medical management. No previous Irish studies have adequately investigated the efficacy of lifestyle intervention programmes in reducing these risk factors in women with prior GDM. Through a two-group, parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT), this study aims to assess the clinical impact, cost-effectiveness and psychological experience ...</description>
            <author>Trials</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7220517</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7220517</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Transgenics: A New Breed of Crops</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7215556&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=33714&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Dtransgenics-a-new-breed-of-crops</link>
            <description>When the first genetically modified (GM) organisms were being developed for the farm, says Anastasia Bodnar, &amp;ldquo;we were promised rocket jet packs&amp;rdquo; -- futuristic, ultra-nutritious crops that would bring exotic produce to the supermarket and help to feed a hungry world. [More] (Source: Scientific American - Official RSS Feed)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Scientific American - Official RSS Feed</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7215556</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7215556</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Hard Look at 3 Myths about Genetically Modified Crops</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7215557&amp;cid=d_74_58_f&amp;fid=33714&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scientificamerican.com%2Farticle.cfm%3Fid%3Da-hard-look-at-3-myths-about-genetically-modified-crops</link>
            <description>In the pitched debate over genetically modified (GM) foods and crops, it can be hard to see where scientific evidence ends and dogma and speculation begin. In the nearly 20&amp;nbsp;years since they were first commercialized, GM crop technologies have seen dramatic uptake. Advocates say that they have increased agricultural production by more than US$98 billion and saved an estimated 473 million kilograms of pesticides from being sprayed. But critics question their environmental, social and economic impacts. [More] (Source: Scientific American - Official RSS Feed)</description>
            <author>Scientific American - Official RSS Feed</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7215557</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7215557</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Telling Patients About Staffing Levels</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7220896&amp;cid=d_74_27_f&amp;fid=34190&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjournals.lww.com%2Fajnonline%2FFulltext%2F2013%2F05000%2FTelling_Patients_About_Staffing_Levels.26.aspx</link>
            <description>Transparency or self-interest? (Source: AJN)</description>
            <author>AJN</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7220896</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7220896</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Informed consent or informed refusal?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7208919&amp;cid=d_74_11_f&amp;fid=34438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ajodo.org%2Farticle%2FPIIS0889540613001212%2Fabstract%3Frss%3Dyes</link>
            <description>Karen is an anesthesiology resident and your last patient of the week. Her chief concern is the irregularity of her maxillary incisors. She describes her experience of prolonged, comprehensive orthodontic therapy as an adolescent. She says that she had “4 years of treatment with 8 teeth extracted and a night brace—the works!” She admits that the result was never ideal, even immediately after treatment. (Source: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics)</description>
            <author>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7208919</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7208919</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rethinking placebo in psychiatry: the range of placebo effects [Articles]</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7209307&amp;cid=d_74_172_f&amp;fid=27086&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fapt.rcpsych.org%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F19%2F3%2F162%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article, the first of two on placebo effects, provides a broad overview of placebo in the field of medicine. A brief conceptual history is followed by some basic facts about placebos. Problems of definition are identified. Additive and non-additive models of treatment effects, and problems of measurement of placebo effects are described. The role of placebo in the pharmacotherapy of depression and complementary and alternative medicine is discussed. The &amp;lsquo;efficacy paradox&amp;rsquo; (that placebo treatments can have larger effects than &amp;lsquo;evidence-based treatments&amp;rsquo;) is introduced. Finally, ethical issues are discussed. (Source: Advances in Psychiatric Treatment)</description>
            <author>Advances in Psychiatric Treatment</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7209307</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7209307</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Parental Perceptions of Forgoing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration During End-of-Life Care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7210377&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32770&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpediatrics.aappublications.org%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F131%2F5%2F861%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>CONCLUSIONS:
FANH in children at the EOL is an acceptable form of palliation for some parents and may contribute to a death that is perceived to be peaceful and comfortable. In situations in which FANH may be a reasonable possibility, physicians should be prepared to introduce the option. (Source: PEDIATRICS)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>PEDIATRICS</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7210377</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7210377</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can a Patient Designate His Doctor as His Proxy Decision Maker?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7210391&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32770&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpediatrics.aappublications.org%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F131%2F5%2F986%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>We present a case in which those issues arose, and sought comments from Sabrina Derrington, a pediatric palliative care physician; Arthur Derse, an emergency department physician and lawyer; and Phil Black, a pulmonologist. (Source: PEDIATRICS)</description>
            <author>PEDIATRICS</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7210391</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7210391</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ethical Controversies in Organ Donation After Circulatory Death</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7210401&amp;cid=d_74_33_f&amp;fid=32770&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpediatrics.aappublications.org%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fabstract%2F131%2F5%2F1021%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The persistent mismatch between the supply of and need for transplantable organs has led to efforts to increase the supply, including controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD). Controlled DCD involves organ recovery after the planned withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and the declaration of death according to the cardiorespiratory criteria. Two central ethical issues in DCD are when organ recovery can begin and how to manage conflicts of interests. The &quot;dead donor rule&quot; should be maintained, and donors in cases of DCD should only be declared dead after the permanent cessation of circulatory function. Permanence is generally established by a 2- to 5-minute waiting period. Given ongoing controversy over whether the cessation must also be irreversible, physicians should not be re...</description>
            <author>PEDIATRICS</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7210401</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7210401</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Online Counseling: A Narrative and Critical Review of the Literature</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7211855&amp;cid=d_74_36_f&amp;fid=33731&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fresolve%2Fdoi%3FDOI%3D10.1002%252Fjclp.21974</link>
            <description>ConclusionA growing body of knowledge to date is positive in showing that online counseling can have a similar impact and is capable of replicating the facilitative conditions as face‐to‐face encounters. A need remains for stronger empirical evidence to establish efficacy and effectiveness and to understand better the unique mediating and facilitative variables. (Source: Journal of Clinical Psychology)</description>
            <author>Journal of Clinical Psychology</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7211855</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7211855</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Retraction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7212155&amp;cid=d_74_7_f&amp;fid=29166&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fheart.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F99%2F11%2F820-a%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>DiNicolantonio JJ, Di Pasquale P,Taylor RS et al. Low sodium versus normal sodium diets in systolic heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis This paper was published on-line in Heart on 21 August 2012. It reports a meta-analysis of six earlier papers.1&amp;ndash;6 It has come to our attention that two of these papers contain duplicate data in tables reporting baseline data and treatment effects.3 4 The matter was considered by BMJ Publishing Ethics Committee. The Committee considered that without sight of the raw data on which the two papers containing the duplicate data were based, their reliability could not be substantiated. Following inquiries, it turns out that the raw data are no longer available having been lost as a result of computer failure. Under the circumstances, it was ...</description>
            <author>Heart</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7212155</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7212155</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Suggested Guidelines for the Practice of Arthroscopic Surgery</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7213734&amp;cid=d_74_43_f&amp;fid=34523&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arthroscopyjournal.org%2Farticle%2FPIIS0749806313002260%2Fabstract%3Frss%3Dyes</link>
            <description>This statement was prepared by the Committee on Ethics and Standards and the Board of Directors of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.  The decision to grant and renew privileges in diagnostic arthroscopy and or arthroscopic surgery is typically made by individual hospitals with input from medical staff committees and appropriate department chairpersons, in accordance with individual hospital and medical staff bylaws, rules and regulations. In situations where arthroscopic surgical privileges are requested, a Board Certified orthopedic surgeon or equivalent specialist, with considerable experience in the field of arthroscopic surgery should be involved in the decision making process to grant these privileges. (Source: Arthroscopy)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Arthroscopy</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7213734</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7213734</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pre-symptomatic genetic testing for inherited cardiac conditions: a qualitative exploration of psychosocial and ethical implications</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7214778&amp;cid=d_74_50_f&amp;fid=33068&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.nature.com%2F%7Er%2Fejhg%2Frss%2Faop%2F%7E3%2Flz3yOD7qR-Q%2Fejhg.2013.81</link>
            <description>Authors: Elizabeth Ormondroyd, Stephanie Oates, Michael Parker, Edward Blair
          &amp; Hugh Watkins (Source: European Journal of Human Genetics)</description>
            <author>European Journal of Human Genetics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7214778</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7214778</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217316&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2Fe1%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In the article &amp;lsquo;After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?&amp;rsquo; arguments are made in favour of the moral permissibility of intentionally killing newborn infants, under particular conditions. Here we argue that their arguments are based on an indefensible view of personhood, and we question the logic of harm and interest that informs their arguments. Furthermore, we argue that the conclusions here are so contrary to ordinary moral intuitions that the argument and conclusions based upon it&amp;mdash;including those which defend more mainstream methods of abortion&amp;mdash;should be treated with immediate suspicion. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217316</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217316</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>After-birth abortion: the intuition argument</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217317&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2Fe5%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The argument advanced by Giubilini and Minerva is an important one, but it suffers from some shortcomings. I briefly criticise their reasoning and method and argue that after birth abortion should be limited largely to infants with disabilities. My argument is based not on solid scientific evidence or cold rational reasoning but on intuition, something that has long been discounted as irrelevant in biomedical discourse. I end with a recommendation to all of us: in order to make a change, one should not only choose one&amp;rsquo;s battles, but also one&amp;rsquo;s weapon and mode of attack. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217317</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217317</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217318&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2Fe6%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper discusses the issue of &amp;lsquo;post-birth abortion&amp;rsquo; from an applied perspective. Three hypothetical situations where a newborn considered as a &amp;lsquo;potential person&amp;rsquo; is at risk of being killed are proposed to highlight the potential controversial outcomes of post-birth abortion. The internal consistency of the argument proposed by Giubilini and Minerva to morally justify newborn killing is contested as well. Finally, an alternative moral strategy based on the precautionary principle and excluding any distinction between potential and actual persons is proposed as rational. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217318</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217318</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217319&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2Fe11%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article provides an ethical justification of why we in this political consensus should not waver, and why we should grant the right to life to all born human infants. Moreover, there is an ethical justification to granting the right to life even to unborn human beings, who already bear a human face. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217319</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217319</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217320&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2Fe15%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Two notable limitations exist on the use of personhood arguments in establishing moral status. Firstly, although the attribution of personhood may give us sufficient reason to grant something moral status, it is not a necessary condition. Secondly, even if a person is that which has the &amp;lsquo;highest&amp;rsquo; moral status, this does not mean that any interests of a person are justifiable grounds to kill something that has a &amp;lsquo;lower&amp;rsquo; moral status. Additional justification is needed to overcome a basic wrongness associated with killing something possessing moral status. There are clear arguments already available in this regard in the case of a foetus that are not available in the case of a newborn infant. Hence, there is scope to consistently hold that abortion may be permissible ...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217320</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217320</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Killing fetuses and killing newborns</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217321&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2Fe19%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The argument for the moral permissibility of killing newborns is a challenge to liberal positions on abortion because it can be considered a reductio of their defence of abortion. Here I defend the liberal stance on abortion by arguing that the argument for the moral permissibility of killing newborns on ground of the social, psychological and economic burden on the parents recently put forward by Giubilini and Minerva is not valid; this is because they fail to show that newborns cannot be harmed and because there are morally relevant differences between fetuses and newborns. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217321</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217321</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217322&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F257%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article met those criteria. It created unprecedented global outrage for a paper published in an academic medical ethics journal. In this special issue of the Journal, Giubilini and Minerva's paper comes to print along with 31 articles from some of the best scholars in the world, from the broadest range of perspectives on abortion and infanticide, including those strongly critical of Giubilini and Minerva. The killing of a baby is among the most shocking of human practices. I am strongly opposed to the legalisation of infanticide along the lines discussed by Giubilini and Minerva. But I would like to explain why a journal... (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217322</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217322</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Discussing infanticide</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217323&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F260%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Jeremy Bentham, protesting against the cruelty of inflicting the death penalty on mothers who kill their newborn infants, described infanticide as the killing of a being &amp;lsquo;who has ceased to be, before knowing what existence is.&amp;rsquo; He also pointed out that is an offence &amp;lsquo;of a nature not to give the slightest inquietude to the most timid imagination,&amp;rsquo; for all those who come to learn of the offence are themselves too old to be threatened by it.1 These points still hold true, and also apply to abortion. They do not, of course, enable one to conclude that there is nothing wrong with either abortion or infanticide, but they do suggest a plausible ground for thinking that these acts should not be thought of as morally equivalent to the murder of beings who are capable of &amp;lsq...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217323</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217323</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217324&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F261%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call &amp;lsquo;after-birth abortion&amp;rsquo; (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217324</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217324</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clarifications on the moral status of newborns and the normative implications</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217325&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F264%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In this paper we clarify some issues related to our previous article &amp;lsquo;After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?&amp;rsquo;. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217325</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217325</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Philosophy, critical thinking and 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217326&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F266%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Confronted with an article defending conclusions that many people judge problematic, philosophers are interested, first of all, in clarifying exactly what arguments are being offered for the views in question, and then, second, in carefully and dispassionately examining those arguments, to determine whether or not they are sound. As a philosopher, then, that is how I would naturally approach the article &amp;lsquo;After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?&amp;rsquo;, by Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva. Very few philosophical publications, however, have evoked either more widespread attention, or emotionally more heated reactions, than this article has. Because of that, I am going to proceed, initially, in a different fashion, and rather than focusing upon the specific arguments that ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217326</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217326</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Infanticide and moral consistency</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217327&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F273%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>The aim of this essay is to show that there are no easy options for those who are disturbed by the suggestion that infanticide may on occasion be morally permissible. The belief that infanticide is always wrong is doubtfully compatible with a range of widely shared moral beliefs that underlie various commonly accepted practices. Any set of beliefs about the morality of abortion, infanticide and the killing of animals that is internally consistent and even minimally credible will therefore unavoidably contain some beliefs that are counterintuitive. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217327</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217327</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217328&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F281%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper identifies and contests the thesis it takes to be the central premise of Giubilini and Minerva, &amp;lsquo;Why should the baby live?&amp;rsquo;, namely that rights, subjecthood and personhood have as a necessary condition that the undergoing of a harm be experienced. That thesis entails the repugnant or absurd conclusion that we do not have the right not to be killed in our sleep. The conclusion can be avoided by adding some premise or qualification about actual capacities for experience of harm, but nothing in the Giubilini and Minerva article shows that such capacities do not exist, as actual and not merely potential, in the newly born human infant (and indeed in the unborn human child/foetus). The present paper reviews an earlier philosophical attempt to deploy an awareness criterion...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217328</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217328</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The common premise for uncommon conclusions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217329&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F284%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Recent controversy over philosophical advocacy of infanticide (or the comically-styled euphemism &amp;lsquo;postnatal abortion&amp;rsquo;) reveals a surprisingly common premise uniting many of the opponents and supporters of the practice. This is the belief that the moral status of the early fetus or embryo with respect to a right to life is identical to that of a newly born or even very young baby. From this premise, infanticidists and strong anti-abortionists draw opposite conclusions, the former that the healthy newly born have no inherent right to life and the latter that minute embryos and the very early fetus have the same right to life as young babies. (Indeed strong anti-abortionists tend to regard this right to life as identical to that possessed by adult humans.) This paper argues that t...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217329</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217329</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217330&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F289%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Giubilini and Minerva ask why birth should be a critical dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable reasons for terminating existence. Their argument is that birth does not change moral status in the sense that is relevant: the ability to be harmed by interruption of one's aims. Rather than question the plausibility of their position or the argument they give, we ask instead about the importance to scholarship or policy of publishing the article: does it to any extent make a novel or needed addition to the literature? Giubilini and Minerva's argument is remarkably similar to one advanced by Michael Tooley in &amp;lsquo;Abortion and Infanticide,&amp;rsquo; almost 40&amp;nbsp;years ago. There have been immense changes in the intervening 40&amp;nbsp;years: in the ability to diagnose conditions early i...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217330</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217330</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Groningen Protocol for newborn euthanasia; which way did the slippery slope tilt?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217331&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F293%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In The Netherlands, neonatal euthanasia has become a legal option and the Groningen Protocol contains an approach to identify situations in which neonatal euthanasia might be appropriate. In the 5&amp;nbsp;years following the publication of the protocol, neither the prediction that this would be the first step on a slippery slope, nor the prediction of complete transparency and legal control became true. Instead, we experienced a transformation of the healthcare system after antenatal screening policy became a part of antenatal care. This resulted in increased terminations of pregnancy and less euthanasia. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217331</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217331</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217332&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F296%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This is a response to Giubilini and Minerva arguing that, on the basis of the similar moral status of the fetus and infant, infanticide is justifiable for many of the same reasons that justify abortion. It argues that, although the authors are correct in claiming the logical connection between abortion and infanticide, they are mistaken in their moral anthropology and so misunderstand which way the reasoning should cut. It concludes with an exhortation&amp;mdash;especially to fellow pro-lifers&amp;mdash;to have a different kind of discourse on these matters. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217332</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217332</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Infanticide and madness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217333&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F299%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>I am, of course, aware that infanticide was accepted and practiced in ancient Greece and Rome, and is still practiced (usually secretly, with winks and nods from public authorities, and with guilty denials by those who perform the killings and those officials who tolerate and sometimes even encourage them) in places like India and China today; just as I am aware that slavery was accepted and practiced in ancient Greece and Rome (and in the American south until 1865), and is still practiced in some places (eg, Mauritania) today. But if philosophers, no matter how sophisticated, were to step forward today to argue that slavery is morally acceptable (eg, because some people would have better lives as slaves than the lives they will lead in circumstances of freedom&amp;mdash;you can easily imagine...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217333</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217333</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217334&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F301%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Professor George and I agree more than we disagree, but I continue to question his use of &amp;lsquo;madness&amp;rsquo; to describe support of infanticide. Many will think he means no reasonable person can support infanticide&amp;mdash;especially when (1) he compares it with support of slavery and (2) he claims that &amp;lsquo;anyone&amp;rsquo; should &amp;lsquo;immediately&amp;rsquo; be able to see that infanticide is wrong. George admits that Jefferson Davis&amp;rsquo; support of slavery was not the same as support of slavery today because Davis&amp;rsquo; social order was built around principles which obscured slavery's great evil. But something similar is the case with contemporary support of infanticide. The social order in the West is built on an understanding of autonomy, sexuality and consumerism, which makes abortio...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217334</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217334</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response to: Is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217335&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F302%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>As Charles Camosy observes, he and I agree more than we disagree. He believes with no less conviction than I do that deliberately killing infant children is profoundly morally wrong and a grave violation of human rights.1 So where do we disagree? I think that killing infant children, or promoting the moral permissibility of doing so, is moral madness, and that we should say so, rather than treating infanticide as just one more legitimate, albeit in the end morally mistaken view. We owe this to potential victims of the potential mainstreaming of support for infanticide. Professor Camosy suggests that my view, or its public expression, is uncharitable towards advocates of infanticide and &amp;lsquo;at variance with a Christian approach&amp;rsquo;. I am confident that it is not. If, however, he is ri...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217335</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217335</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217336&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F303%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article analyses, from a bioethics journal editor's perspective, the threats to academic freedom and freedom of expression that academic bioethicists and academic bioethics journals are subjected to by political activists applying pressure from outside of the academy. I defend bioethicists&amp;rsquo; academic freedom to reach and defend conclusions many find offensive and &amp;lsquo;wrong&amp;rsquo;. However, I also support the view that academics arguing controversial matters such as, for instance, the moral legitimacy of infanticide should take clear responsibility for the views they defend and should not try to hide behind analytical philosophers&amp;rsquo; rationales such as wanting to test an argument for the sake of testing an argument. This article proposes that bioethics journals establish hi...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217336</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217336</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Life in the cloud and freedom of speech</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217337&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F307%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper is primarily about the personal and public responsibilities of ethics and of ethicists in speaking, writing and commenting publicly about issues of ethical, political and social significance. The paper argues that any such interventions are &amp;lsquo;willy-nilly&amp;rsquo;, actually or potentially, in the public domain in ways that make any self-conscious decision about intended publics or audiences problematic. In it is argued that a famous, and hitherto useful, distinction relating to the ethical limitations on freedom of speech which we owe to John Stuart Mill may, because of the emergence of &amp;lsquo;the cloud&amp;rsquo; have become redundant or inoperable. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217337</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217337</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Should policy ethics come in two colours: green or white?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217338&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F312%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>When writing about policy, do you think in green or white? If not, I recommend that you do. I suggest that writers and journal editors should explicitly label every policy ethics paper either &amp;lsquo;green&amp;rsquo; or &amp;lsquo;white&amp;rsquo;. A green paper is an unconstrained exploration of a policy question. The controversial &amp;lsquo;After-birth abortion&amp;rsquo; paper is an example. Had it been labelled as &amp;lsquo;green&amp;rsquo;, readers could have understood what Giubilini and Minerva explained later: that it was a discussion of philosophical ideas, and not a policy proposal advocating infanticide. A serious policy proposal should be labelled by writer(s) and editor(s) as &amp;lsquo;white&amp;rsquo;. Its purpose should be to influence policy. In order to influence policy, I suggest three essential, and two ...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217338</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217338</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The fragility of freedom of speech</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217339&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F316%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Freedom of speech is a fundamental liberty that imposes a stringent duty of tolerance. Tolerance is limited by direct incitements to violence. False notions and bad laws on speech have obscured our view of this freedom. Hence, perhaps, the self-righteous intolerance, incitements and threats in response to Giubilini and Minerva. Those who disagree have the right to argue back but their attempts to shut us up are morally wrong. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217339</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217339</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217340&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F317%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>From 28 February to the end of March 2012, the Italian media reacted fiercely to the Giubilini and Minerva paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics a few days earlier. The first article viewed the proposal as analogous to &amp;lsquo;barbaric invasions&amp;rsquo;, but in a first stage of the debate it could be seen as a case of the usual controversy between Catholics and secularists. Then emotive reactions prevailed and a flood of papers expressed strong opposition to &amp;lsquo;infanticide&amp;rsquo;. The authors were even deemed insane; the fact that both are Italian certainly increased interest in the subject as well as surprise at their proposal, which some reckoned to be an insult to their &amp;lsquo;national identity&amp;rsquo;. Even freedom of academic research and discussion was put in question, an...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217340</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217340</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Introduction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217341&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F323%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In light of controversy surrounding the initial online publication of Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva's article on &amp;lsquo;After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?&amp;rsquo; in the Journal of Medical Ethics,1 we invited all regular and honorary staff members of the Centre for Human Bioethics at Monash University in Melbourne (where Giubilini works as a tutor) to write short commentaries summarising their views on the moral status of early human lives for publication in a special symposium in the journal Monash Bioethics Review (which we co-edit). Our motivation was to illustrate the diversity of views about such matters held by the Centre's members and, more generally, among contemporary secular philosophical bioethicists. Our &amp;lsquo;Symposium on &amp;lsquo;after-birth abortion&amp;rsqu...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217341</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217341</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217342&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F323-a%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Giubilini and Minerva argue that, in cases where in utero abortion is currently condoned, &amp;lsquo;after-birth abortion&amp;rsquo;, or infanticide, ought also to be permitted.1 For example, a third-trimester abortion might be defended on the basis of foetal genetic abnormality, or through appeal to unacceptable parental suffering should the child live. On the authors&amp;rsquo; formulation, infanticide in neonates of the same corrected age, in otherwise identical circumstances, ought also to be defended. The paper has, unsurprisingly, provoked public criticism, and even revulsion. I argue that the distress evoked is a moral consideration in its own right. Community interests ought to inform the morality of abortion and, by extension, its &amp;lsquo;postpartum&amp;rsquo; counterpart. Respect for personal aut...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217342</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217342</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Some comments on the paper 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217343&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F323-b%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Giubilini and Minerva present a clear argument for the view that, other things being equal, reasons that justify abortion also hold for early infanticide.1 A reasoned argument deserves a reasoned response. Instead, many responses following the electronic publication of the article were mere outpourings of outrage and abuse to the authors and the editor of the Journal of Medical Ethics.2 The principal arguments put by Giubilini and Minerva date back some 40&amp;nbsp;years, when Michael Tooley presented a strong case for the moral equivalence of abortion and infanticide. According to Tooley, only &amp;lsquo;continuing selves&amp;rsquo; are &amp;lsquo;persons&amp;rsquo;, and only persons can be ascribed a &amp;lsquo;right to life&amp;rsquo;. Given that neither fetuses nor infants are persons, they lack the right to life...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217343</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217343</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Moral uncertainty and the moral status of early human life</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217344&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F324%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Because a newborn baby does not have sufficiently complex psychological capacities to have a concept of continuation of (its) life, according to Tooley, it cannot desire continuation of (its) life, and thus cannot have a right to it.1 A similar position has been advocated by Kuhse and Singer2 3&amp;mdash;and, more recently, by Giubilini and Minerva.4 Key assumptions of Tooley are that (1) being able to desire something is a necessary condition of having a right to it and (2) having a concept of something is a necessary condition of being able to desire it. Despite their plausibility, these premises are at least open to question&amp;mdash;that is, these are things that there can presumably be reasonable disagreement about. I would guess that many (if not most) people have stronger intuitions regard...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217344</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217344</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217345&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F324-a%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva reject arguments from claims that fetuses and newborn infants are potential persons, because they argue that potential persons cannot be harmed.1 But whether or not potential persons can be harmed, is it clear that potential persons are entirely lacking in moral status, of a kind that could count as a (pro tanto) reason against bringing about their demise? We do not generally regard potential as entirely lacking in moral value until it is actualised. For example, parents who believe they have identified in their child an emerging musical talent commonly see this potential as having some (not necessarily moral) value, however small, which would count as a reason against destroying that potential gratuitously. Similarly, the morally valuable capacities...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217345</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217345</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The performativity of personhood</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217346&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F325%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In debates on infanticide, including the recent defence of so-called &amp;lsquo;after-birth abortion&amp;rsquo;, philosophers generally treat the term &amp;lsquo;the person&amp;rsquo; as descriptive, such that statements claiming that something is a person (or not) can be considered true or false, depending on the characteristics of that thing. This obscures important aspects of its usage. J L Austen identified a subset of speech acts as performative, in that they do things in their very declaration or utterance. They do not simply describe states of affairs or things, but perform the act they ostensibly describe. &amp;lsquo;I promise&amp;rsquo; or &amp;lsquo;I apologise&amp;rsquo; may be taken as paradigmatic. Performative speech acts are not judged according to their truth-value, but their &amp;lsquo;felicity&amp;rsquo;&amp;mdash;...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217346</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217346</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The moral significance of being born</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217347&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F326%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This paper is a response to Giubilini and Minerva's defence of infanticide. I argue that any account of moral worth or moral rights that depends on the intrinsic properties of individuals alone is committed to agreeing with Giubilini and Minerva that birth cannot by itself make a moral difference to the moral worth of the infant. However, I argue that moral worth need not depend on intrinsic properties alone. It might also depend on relational and social properties. I claim that the in principle availability of neonates to participate in scaffolded interactions with carers might plausibly be seen as contributing to their moral worth. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217347</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217347</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217348&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F330%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In their paper 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?' Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue that because there are no significant differences between a fetus and a neonate, in that neither possess sufficiently robust mental traits to qualify as persons, a neonate may be justifiably killed for any reason that also justifies abortion. To further emphasise their view that a newly born infant is more on a par with a fetus rather than a more developed baby, Giubilini and Minerva elect to call this 'after-birth abortion' rather than infanticide. In this paper, I argue that their thesis is incorrect, and that the moral permissibility of abortion does not entail the moral permissibility of 'after-birth' abortion. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217348</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217348</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217349&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F336%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article challenges these criteria, suggesting that these and related ideas are rely on arbitrary and discriminatory notions of human moral status. Our propensity to sleep, fall unconscious, pass out and so on, demonstrates that we often exhibit our status as &amp;lsquo;potential persons&amp;rsquo; who are not in the condition of attributing any value to their own existence. Our abilities, age and desirability can and do fluctuate. The equal dignity principle, distinguished in turn from both the excesses of vitalism and consequentialism, is analysed and defended in the context of human rights logic and law. The normalisation of non- and involuntary euthanasia, via such emerging practices as the self-styled Groningen Protocol, is considered. Substituted consent to the euthanasia of babies and o...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217349</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217349</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217350&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F341%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>This article responds to Giubilini and Minerva&amp;rsquo;s article &amp;lsquo;After birth abortion: why should the baby live?&amp;rsquo; published in the Journal of Medical Ethics. They argue for the permissibility of &amp;lsquo;after-birth abortion&amp;rsquo;, based on two conjoined considerations: (1) the fetus or newborn, though a &amp;lsquo;potential person&amp;rsquo;, is not an actual person, because it is not mature enough to appreciate its own interests, and (2) because we allow parents to terminate the life of a fetus when it is diagnosed with a deformity or fatal illness because of the burden it will place on the child, parent, family or society we should also allow parents to do the same to their newborn, since it is no more a person than the fetus. The author critiques this case by pointing out (a) the met...&lt;div id=&quot;medworm&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;MedWorm Sponsor Message:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Find the best Christmas presents and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejanuarysales.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;January Sales&lt;/a&gt; in the UK with this simple shopping directory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217350</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217350</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The moral status of babies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217351&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F345%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In their controversial paper &amp;lsquo;After-birth abortion&amp;rsquo;, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva argue that there is no rational basis for allowing abortion but prohibiting infanticide (&amp;lsquo;after-birth abortion&amp;rsquo;). We ought in all consistency either to allow both or prohibit both. This paper rejects their claim, arguing that much-neglected considerations in philosophical discussions of this issue are capable of explaining why we currently permit abortion in some circumstances, while prohibiting infanticide. (Source: Journal of Medical Ethics)</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217351</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217351</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Abortion, infanticide and moral context</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=7217352&amp;cid=d_74_74_f&amp;fid=30998&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fjme.bmj.com%2Fcgi%2Fcontent%2Fshort%2F39%2F5%2F350%3Frss%3D1</link>
            <description>In &amp;lsquo;After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?&amp;rsquo;, Giubilini and Minerva argue that infanticide should be permitted for the same reasons as abortion. In particular, they argue that infanticide should be permitted even for reasons that do not primarily serve the interests (or would-be best interests) of the newborn. They claim that abortion is permissible for reasons that do not primarily serve the interests (or would-be interests) of the fetus because fetuses lack a right to life. They argue that newborns also lack a right to life, and they conclude that therefore, the same reasons that justify abortion can justify infanticide. This conclusion does not follow. The lack of a right to life is not decisive. Furthermore, the justificatory power of a given reason is a function of...</description>
            <author>Journal of Medical Ethics</author>
            <type>journals</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=7217352</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">7217352</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
