<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: 1980s</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with '1980s'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%221980s%22&t=%221980s%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:54:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Psychiatry Doesn’t Do Psychotherapy Anymore</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4554651&amp;cid=t_292347_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F03%2F06%2Fpsychiatry-doesnt-do-psychotherapy-anymore%2F</link>
            <description>Despite a trend that started as early as the late 1980s, Gardiner Harris writing in The New York Times yesterday seems to bemoan the fact that most psychiatrists don&amp;#8217;t practice psychotherapy any longer.
Perhaps Harris should have interviewed Dr. Danny Carlat, who nearly a year ago wrote about his experiences as a modern psychiatrist (in the The New York Times Magazine, no less). Psychiatrists nowadays are generally poorly trained in psychotherapy, so they spend most of their time prescribing psychiatric medications. (Dr. Carlat&amp;#8217;s book, Unhinged is well worth the read for further background about modern psychiatry.)
So I wasn&amp;#8217;t sure why I was reading this in the &amp;#8220;Money and Policy&amp;#8221; section of the Times. Surely it&amp;#8217;s not news that psychiatry is no longer pra...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4554651</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:16:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4554651</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Too Much Journalistic Enthusiasm Again For The Artificial Heart</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3753823&amp;cid=t_292347_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Ftoo-much-journalistic-enthusiasm-again-for-the-artificial-heart%2F2010.07.14</link>
            <description>Here we go again. And believe me, as one who&amp;#8217;s covered the artificial heart experiments of the 1980s, I feel like I&amp;#8217;ve been through this countless times before &amp;#8212; but so have health news readers.
Another entrepeneurial team announces hopes for its artificial heart device and some news coverage trumpets the company&amp;#8217;s announcement:


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
But this was in The New York Times! Now, granted &amp;#8212; it&amp;#8217;s in a &amp;#8220;Global Business&amp;#8221; section. But we don&amp;#8217;t see why that removes the need for more scrutiny, for independent perspective, and for a better discussion of evidence. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Gary Schwitzer's HealthNewsReview Blog* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3753823</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:00:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3753823</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Career Barbie: Flashback Friday</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3632245&amp;cid=t_292347_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fcareer-barbie-flashback-friday%2F</link>
            <description>By the mid 1980s, 42.5% of the nation&amp;#8217;s workforce was made up of women, and Barbie was part of the ranks. We just wonder how she was able to talk on the phone without bendable elbows.

Post from: BlissTree
Career Barbie: Flashback Friday (Source: Breastfeeding 1-2-3)</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3632245</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:25:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3632245</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Demarees to Wal-Mart: Get Ready for Your Bath</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2828435&amp;cid=t_292347_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2009%2F09%2F24%2Fdemarees-to-wal-mart-get-ready-for-your-bath%2F</link>
            <description>My new post on Politics Daily / Woman Up:
A year ago A.J. and Lisa Demaree of Peoria, Ariz. thought they were taking pictures of their daughters taking a bath, but to a Wal-Mart employee, the Demarees were committing &amp;#8220;child erotica&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;sex exploitation.&amp;#8221;
I didn&amp;#8217;t realize that child pornographers were in the habit of schlepping their images over to Wal-Mart, but what do I know?
Child Protective Services took custody of the kids for a month, and the couple, who were never charged, spent $75,000 on legal fees. Now the Demarees are suing both the state of Arizona and Wal-Mart. The Demarees&amp;#8217; lawyer released a photo, available at the San Francisco Chronicle Web site&amp;#8230;
Read the rest on AOL: Demarees to Wal-Mart: Get Ready for Your Bath.
Posted in Woman U...</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2828435</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:29:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2828435</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>High Blood Sugar Increases Cancer Risk</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=501624&amp;cid=t_292347_87_f&amp;fid=34867&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thediabetesblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F26%2Fhigh-blood-sugar-increases-cancer-risk%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: Type 2, Adult Onset, Lifestyle, ResearchA Swedish study has found that elevated blood sugar in women is linked with increased risk of developing cancer.
Researchers identified 2,478 incident cases of cancer from records of 33,293 women and 31,304 men who participated in the study. Participants were recruited in the mid-1980s at age 40, 50 and 60 and the study covered a 13-year period. The records included levels of glucose in the blood when fasting and after receiving an infusion of glucose. Researchers calculated the cancer risk relative to blood glucose while adjusting for: age, year of enrollment, fasting time and smoking status. Women with blood sugar levels higher than normal have a total higher risk for cancer while for men the risk was unchanged at higher blood sugar le...</description>
            <author>The Diabetes Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=501624</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">501624</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

