<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: act health</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'act health'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22act+health%22&t=%22act+health%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:35:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>If It’s Evitable, I Don’t Like It!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4626872&amp;cid=t_345007_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F03%2F24%2Fif-its-evitable-i-dont-like-it%2F</link>
            <description>Situationist Contributor Aaron Kay as well as Peter A. Ubel and Gavan Fitzsimons wrote the following editorial for the Detroit Free Press.:
This week it will be one year since President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law. Despite all the controversy that preceded the bill’s passage, most health policy experts confidently predicted that the public would soon embrace the legislation.
To back up these predictions, they pointed out that Medicare was quite controversial when it was established in the 1960s, but rapidly grew in popularity. Much the same happened more recently with Medicare Part D, the law championed by President George W. Bush to extend Medicare coverage to medications.
Recent polls belie these predictions, however, as support for health care reform has...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4626872</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:01:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4626872</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tougher Sentencing For Pharma Fraud?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4592689&amp;cid=t_345007_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FUdLb4vh7Hrs%2F</link>
            <description>What if a pharma exec was supposed to be sentenced for a misdemeanor but, due to a change in sentencing guidelines, was instead going to receive a harsher sentence usually meted out for felonies? Depending upon your station in life, this may be a good thing or a bad thing. If you happen to be the exec, however, this is probably not a good thing. But if a recent proposal goes into effect, well&amp;#8230; tough luck.
What are we talking about? Two months ago, the US Sentencing Commission issued a proposal to amend the sentencing guidelines that would impose tougher punishments for anyone convicted of so-called strict liability offenses under the Food, Drug &amp;#038; Cosmetic Act (look here). In legal lingo, the difference is between between following the 2B guidelines for fraud instead of the curre...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4592689</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:15:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4592689</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>National Health Policy Conference Summary Blog Post</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4455261&amp;cid=t_345007_87_f&amp;fid=38368&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FDisruptiveWomenInHealthCare%2F%7E3%2FYAbzkXwG0_0%2F</link>
            <description>By Hope Ditto. It has been almost a year since Congress passed the Affordable Care Act (ACA), but it seems that the questions and concerns surrounding it and its implementation are increasing rather than decreasing with time. From its legality to its funding, threats of repeal to promises to replace, buzz about the ACA from Wall Street to Main Street and up and down Pennsylvania Avenue has reached a fever pitch since the 112th Congress convened last month.
We have accepted that things are currently in limbo with regards to health care reform and the provisions born from the ACA, but that does not mean that those in the health care industry can call a recess until Congress can come to some sort of consensus/final decision on health care reform.
Instead, it is up to health care industry to s...</description>
            <author>Disruptive Women in Health Care</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4455261</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:23:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4455261</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An Interview with Disruptive Woman Stephanie Cohen</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4429011&amp;cid=t_345007_87_f&amp;fid=38368&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FDisruptiveWomenInHealthCare%2F%7E3%2Fevo4a9kNq-U%2F</link>
            <description>By Hope Ditto. It’s still too early to tell what exactly will come of the repeal vote on the Hill this week, and what it will mean for health care coverage. Whether the law is repealed altogether, or whether supplemental bills changing different parts of the original legislation are passed, only time will tell. Whether Obama will veto the repeal act, should a repeal make it to his desk (okay, that’s pretty certain, but stranger things have happened), or whether the Republicans would be able to whip enough votes for an override, we can only venture guesses. Only one thing is for certain – there has never been a more confusing time to buy health insurance.
That’s where health care benefits consultants – like Disruptive Women blogger and Golden &amp; Cohen benefits consulting firm c...</description>
            <author>Disruptive Women in Health Care</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4429011</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:04:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4429011</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Majority of States for Repeal Too</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4377557&amp;cid=t_345007_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FM6ZRGjdMFXQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Ilya ShapiroIt&amp;#8217;s now official: 28 states are challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare in the courts. For those of you keeping score, the following six joined the Florida-led lawsuit: Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, Kansas, Wyoming and Maine. Then of course Virginia is pursuing its own suit, and now Oklahoma is about to file its own separate lawsuit based on its voters&amp;#8217; approval in November of a Health Care Freedom Act similar to Virginia&amp;#8217;s.
Sadly &amp;#8212; if I&amp;#8217;m allowed to stop being hard-headed and just shake my head in an &amp;#8220;o tempore o mores&amp;#8221; sort of way &amp;#8212; the government opposed Florida&amp;#8217;s motion to add the six states to its lawsuit. There was no basis for this opposition: the newcomers are for these purposes similarly situated to the existing...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4377557</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:29:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4377557</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Healthcare Reform Will Hit Drug Prices: CBO</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4159499&amp;cid=t_345007_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FgwDDlcchpMc%2F</link>
            <description>So what will health care reform mean to prescription drug pricing? In response to a query from Paul Ryan, a Republican from Wisconsin who is the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, the US Congressional Budget Office has analyzed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and come up with the following forecasts, which discuss price hikes and rebates&amp;#8230;
For instance, the new law is expected to raise prices paid by pharmacies, less any rebates paid by drugmakers to insurers, by about 1 percent, on average. That increase would slightly raise federal costs for Medicare’s drug benefit and the costs for some beneficiaries, but the new discounts would make the costs faced by other beneficiaries substantially lower. T...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4159499</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:13:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4159499</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Federal Right to Obfuscate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3920827&amp;cid=t_345007_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FmipidtQECHg%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperH.R. 3421, the &amp;#8220;Medical Debt Relief Act of 2009,&amp;#8221; has nothing to do with relieving people of medical debts. It adds to the list of information credit reporting agencies may not communicate to their clients.
Current law bars credit bureaus from sharing truthful information about bankruptcies occuring more than ten years in the past, and lawsuits, judgments, tax liens, accounts placed in collection, or other adverse information more than seven years old, except in certain high-dollar credit transactions. This bill would add a new item to the list of officially banned information: medical debts that have been paid more than thirty days before a credit report is issued. 
There are many cases, of course, where people who incur medical debts deserve our sympathy. But do ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3920827</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:43:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3920827</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dentists Should Know About New HIPAA Rules</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2741498&amp;cid=t_345007_125_f&amp;fid=34820&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dentalblogs.com%2Farchives%2Fadministrator%2Fdentists-should-know-about-new-hipaa-rules%2F</link>
            <description>In February, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) was passed as under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). The purpose of the act was to create a nationwide information technology infrastructure that would allow controlled electronic dissemination of health information (EMR).
HITECH rules, which are currently being promulgated by HHS, will place more responsibilities on covered business entities and their business associates. On August 18, a new regulation will go into effect which requires covered entities and their business associates to provide notice of breaches or unauthorized disclosures of protected health information (PHI) within 60 days. Covered entities would be required to provide notification to the breached indiv...</description>
            <author>dental blog for dentists about dentistry</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2741498</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:54:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2741498</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>University of Central Lancashire stops its alternative medicine degrees (or does it?). Yes, it does!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2613856&amp;cid=t_345007_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1899</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up




.The University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) is the first place I asked to see teaching materials that were used on its homeopathy &amp;#8220;BSc&amp;#8221; course. The request was refused, and subsequent internal appeals were refused too, Clearly UCLAN had something to hide. 



 	



An appeal to the information commissioner took almost two years to be judged, but the case was won. The eventual decision by the Information
 Commissioner rejected all the grounds that UClan had used to evade the Freedom of Information Act. 
UClan appealed against the judgement and I still haven&amp;#8217;t got the stuff but that hardly matters now, because the course in question shut its doors. In any case, plenty of stuff from similar courses has leaked out already.
Meanwhile, in September 2008,...</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2613856</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:21:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2613856</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>University of Central Lancashire stops its alternative medicine degrees (or does it?)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2610924&amp;cid=t_345007_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1899</link>
            <description>.The University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) is the first place I asked to see teaching materials that were used on its homeopathy &amp;#8220;BSc&amp;#8221; course. The request was refused, and subsequent internal appeals were refused too, Clearly UCLAN had something to hide. 



 	



An appeal to the information commissioner took almost two years to be judged, but the case was won. The eventual decision by the Information
 Commissioner rejected all the grounds that UClan had used to evade the Freedom of Information Act. 
UClan appealed against the judgement and I still haven&amp;#8217;t got the stuff but that hardly matters now, because the course in question shut its doors. In any case, plenty of stuff from similar courses has leaked out already.
Meanwhile, in September 2008, UCLAN announced an in...</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2610924</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:21:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2610924</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

