<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: airport security</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'airport security'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22airport+security%22&t=%22airport+security%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:18:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Behavior Detection as Interrogation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5118607&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FsIhHwzm_3Z0%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperWith the Department of Homeland Security constantly spinning out new projects and programs (plus re-branded old ones) to investigate you, me, and the kitchen sink, it&amp;#8217;s sometimes hard to keep up. But I was intrigued with a report that behvaior detection officers are getting another look from the Transportation Security Administration. Behavior detection is the unproven, and so far highly unsuccessful (Rittgers, Harper), program premised on the idea that telltale cues can reliably and cost-effectively indicate intent to do harm at airports. 
But there&amp;#8217;s a new behavior detection program already underway. Or is it interrogation?
Due to a bottleneck at the magnetometers in one concourse of the San Francisco airport (no strip-search machines!), I recently had the chance...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5118607</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:43:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5118607</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>After bin Laden</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4780297&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F6uq0Gov-s54%2F</link>
            <description>By David RittgersAs Chris Preble noted early Monday morning, Osama bin Laden is dead. In addition to celebrating V-OBL Day, we should take a moment to reflect on wars of the last decade and the civil liberties we have sacrificed since September 11, 2001. Malou Innocent makes the case for reconsidering our foreign policy, and Jim Harper asks if he can have his airport back. We lay out these thoughts in more detail in this Cato video, After bin Laden.

The phrase “after bin Laden” has a nice ring to it. Cato held counterterrorism conferences in 2009 and 2010, and there’s more Cato work on counterterrorism and homeland security here.
After bin Laden is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4780297</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 12:49:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4780297</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can I Have My Airport Back Please?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4775372&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FSMVDE0lMtw4%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperEven while it was a rumor that President Obama would announce that Osama bin Laden had been killed, Americans began to digest the ramifications, asking, for example, &amp;#8220;can I have my airport back please?&amp;#8221;
Pleasing though it is to have in contemplation, the question is premature. Students of terrorism, such as those who attended our 2009 and 2010 counterterrorism conferences, know that the killing of bin Laden will have little direct effect on the network he spawned. Its indirect, discouraging effect on terrorism is something I mused about in an earlier post.
What about the effects on the rest of us, the people and actors in our great counterterrorism policymaking apparatus?
Osama bin Laden&amp;#8217;s survival helped shore up the mystique of the terrorist supervillain, w...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4775372</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:59:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4775372</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>‘Give Thanks for the TSA’?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4734060&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F_w3pyeTsKZ0%2F</link>
            <description>By Gene HealyMy Washington Examiner column this week covers two developments last week that may make you somewhat less likely to &amp;#8220;Give Thanks for the TSA&amp;#8221; as former Bush speechwriter Marc Thiessen urged on National Review&amp;#8217;s website. 
The first is the viral video of a TSA agent at New Orleans airport giving the “freedom fondle” to a six-year-old girl. The second is Friday’s revelation that among the “behavioral indicators” TSA uses to scope out travelers who deserve extra manhandling is the “arrogant” expression of “contempt against airport passenger procedures.&amp;#8221;
Because, clearly, making a scene on an airport security line is sound strategy for anyone trying to sneak a bomb onto a plane. 
Is it possible that anyone with an IQ above room temperature bu...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4734060</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:06:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4734060</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>TSA’s Pistole Says ‘Risk-Based,’ Means ‘Privacy Invasive’</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4464482&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FM4wg3M3p8Us%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperThere is one thing you can take to the bank from TSA administrator John Pistole's statement that he wants to shift to &quot;risk-based&quot; screening at airports: it hasn't been risk-based up to now. That's a welcome concession because, as I've said before, the DHS and its officials routinely mouth risk terminology, but rarely subject themselves to the rigor of actual risk analysis.
What Administrator Pistole envisions is nothing new. It's the idea of checking the backgrounds of air travelers more deeply, attempting to determine which of them present less of a threat and which prevent more. That opens security holes that the risk-averse TSA is unlikely to actually tolerate, and it has significant privacy and Due Process consequences, including migration toward a national ID syst...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4464482</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:58:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4464482</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Man Acquitted of Crimes Associated with Asserting His Rights</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4394420&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F2ux4-eMpnm4%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim Harper
(HT: Techdirt) It is infuriating to watch the video Phil Mocek made while attempting to assert his legal rights at the airport. The good news is that he has been acquitted of the bogus charges brought against him, including disorderly conduct, concealing his identity, refusing to obey a police officer, and criminal trespass.
The video illustrates the knowledge, fortitude, and cool it takes to assert one&amp;#8217;s rights. We owe our thanks to Mr. Mocek, who has helped to educate the TSA and society in general about the law that applies at the airport. 
Perhaps he can further the educational process by bringing an action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for violation of his civil rights under color of law. The Transporation Security Administration&amp;#8217;s training programs might improve, o...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4394420</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:50:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4394420</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Patdown: Diabetes At The Airport</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4326900&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fthe-patdown-diabetes-at-the-airport%2F2011.01.09</link>
            <description>Last week we were at the airport to travel to Marco Island for the CWD Family Weekend. And we were NOT traveling light, by any stretch. Chris and I had our suitcases, our laptops, and my diabetes supplies (infusion sets, insulin, test strips, glucose tabs, etc.) stashed in a carry on. Oh, and we also had that giggly baby BSparl, plenty of clothes for her to spit up on, formula, bottles, wipes, diapers, water for mixing the formula, toys, Happy Baby puffs for snacks, her car seat, the car seat base, and the stroller. (Phew.)
In addition to all the junk we were carrying, I was also wearing my Animas Ping and my Dexcom sensor (and carrying the receiver) &amp;#8212; which made me a prime candidate for the airport opt-out search from a TSA employee, thanks to the fact that these devices are bett...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4326900</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 23:00:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4326900</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rep. Clyburn Wants Special Treatment at Airports</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4326897&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fl2LdA5IV9s4%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperIt&amp;#8217;s fascinating to watch a member of Congress use a tragedy like Gabrielle Giffords&amp;#8217; shooting to seek advantage over us common folk. On Fox News Sunday this week, Representative James Clyburn (D-SC) suggested that Members of Congress should get special treatment at airports.
Airports are some of the safest places anyone can be. Don&amp;#8217;t use your imagination&amp;#8212;think about it: Airports teem with security personnel and security-conscious citizens. Because their travel schedules are generally unannounced, members of Congress are not any more exposed while traveling than during their other public movements. There is some risk&amp;#8212;we know too well because of this weekend&amp;#8217;s tragedy&amp;#8212;when elected officials make announced public appearances, but that sm...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4326897</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 19:06:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4326897</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Multiple Sclerosis and the TSA: An Open Letter to the Secretary of Homeland Security</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4322594&amp;cid=t_107204_129_f&amp;fid=36038&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.everydayhealth.com%2Fblog%2Ftrevis-life-with-multiple-sclerosis-ms%2Fmultiple-sclerosis-and-the-tsa-an-open-letter-to-the-secretary-of-homeland-security%2F</link>
            <description>Madam Secretary Napolitano,
I’m quite upset… and you should know about it (before someone far more litigious than myself tells you)!
I guess I should preface the forthcoming tirade with the fact that, as I am a proud former member of the US Coast Guard, I know very well the difficulties faced by the line employees of the Transportation Security Administration section of your Homeland Security department. I do not blame them.
I live with multiple sclerosis (MS), a degenerative disease of the central nervous system. Current research points to the body’s immune system as a possible culprit of the disease. As a result, heavy doses of corticosteroids are often employed to battle MS.
One possible side effect of such steroid use is the death of bone, which can force joint replacement. I hav...</description>
            <author>Life with MS</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4322594</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:53:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4322594</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Worth a Thousand Words</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4265677&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FzeMliZLTrhY%2F</link>
            <description>By David Rittgers
Presented without comment. Image here, HT to Uncle.
For more Cato work on the TSA, see “Body Scanners: The Naked Truth,” “On Air Security, We are the Ones We’ve Been Waiting For,” and “TSA Searches, Bomb Risk Near Zero.”
Jim Harper has some blog posts on the topic as well: here, here, here, and here.
Worth a Thousand Words is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4265677</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:14:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4265677</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Conservatives, Liberals, and the TSA</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4197027&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F0GgZvvfEk2s%2F</link>
            <description>By David BoazLibertarians often debate whether conservatives or liberals are more friendly to liberty. We often fall back on the idea that conservatives tend to support economic liberties but not civil liberties, while liberals support civil liberties but not economic liberties &amp;#8212; though this old bromide hardly accounts for the economic policies of President Bush or the war-on-drugs-and-terror-and-Iraq policies of President Obama.
Score one for the conservatives in the surging outrage over the Transportation Security Administration&amp;#8217;s new policy of body scanners and intimate pat-downs. You gotta figure you&amp;#8217;ve gone too far in the violation of civil liberties when you&amp;#8217;ve lost Rick Santorum, George Will, Kathleen Parker, and Charles Krauthammer. (Gene Healy points out th...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4197027</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:16:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4197027</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Privacy and the Common Good</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4074026&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FuutLVr550-4%2F</link>
            <description>By Julian SanchezJim Harper&amp;#8217;s post Monday, responding to communitarian Amitai Etzioni on &amp;#8220;strip search&amp;#8221; scanners at airports, gives me an opportunity to mount one of my hobbyhorses.
My beef with Etzioni&amp;#8217;s conclusory argument isn&amp;#8217;t just that, as Jim observes, he purports to &amp;#8220;weigh&amp;#8221; the individual right to privacy against the common good (here in the guise of &amp;#8220;security&amp;#8221;) without any real analysis of the magnitudes on both sides. It&amp;#8217;s that his framing is fundamentally backwards. The importance of privacy is, to a great extent, a function of its collective dimension—a point to which you&amp;#8217;d think a communitarian theorist who&amp;#8217;s written an entire book on privacy would be more keenly attuned. If I may indulge in a little self...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4074026</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:29:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4074026</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>TSA on the Prowl for Embezzlers</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3895867&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F57rVdRvRjps%2F</link>
            <description>The TSA is exceeding its authority.
At what point does an airport search step over the line?
How about when they start going through your checks, and the police call your husband, suspicious you were clearing out the bank account?
This kind of thing was supposed to stop after the TSA revised its policies a year ago. The revision came in the wake of the unconstitutional seizure of Campaign for Liberty staffer Steven Bierfeldt for carrying cash donations (prompting a lawsuit from the ACLU). A federal judge had already determined that fake passports found on an airline passenger were inadmissible in court.
The TSA is not a law enforcement agency. TSA screeners aren’t supposed to search for anything beyond weapons and explosives. Or, as TSA policy currently reads, &amp;#8220;Screening may not be...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3895867</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:16:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3895867</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stunner: Strip-Search Machine Used to Ogle</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3411089&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fed4MB6J-wnM%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperAn airport security staffer faces discipline after using a whole-body imaging machine to ogle a co-worker, according to this report. It&amp;#8217;s another signal of what&amp;#8217;s to come when the machines are in regular use. (In a previous post, I aired my doubts about the veracity of reports that a famous Indian movie star had been exposed, but the story foretells the future all the same.)
I&amp;#8217;ve written before that whole-body imaging machines in airports create risks to privacy despite TSA&amp;#8217;s efforts to minimize those risks with carefully designed rules and practices.
Rules, of course, were made to be broken, and it’s only a matter of time — federal law or not — before TSA agents without proper supervision find a way to capture images contrary to policy. (Agent ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3411089</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:54:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3411089</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>I Told You So?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3262592&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FC6KCxny69j8%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperThe story that images of a film star produced by whole-body imaging were copied and circulated among airport personnel in London are a little too good to be true for critics of the technology. It may yet be proven a joke or hoax, and airport officials are denying that it happened, saying that it &amp;#8220;simply could not be true.&amp;#8221;
But if Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan was exposed by the technology, it validates more quickly than I expected the concern that controls on body scanning images would ultimately fail.
Here’s how I wrote about the fate of domestic U.S. proscriptions on copying images from whole-body imaging machines in an earlier post:
Rules, of course, were made to be broken, and it’s only a matter of time — federal law or not — before TSA agents witho...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3262592</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:01:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3262592</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>George Clooney’s Docile Body</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3156445&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FGnhUiZBnqHQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Julian SanchezRunning the airport maze to board my flight from Madrid back to the U.S. last week, I found myself thinking, with no small measure of envy, about Ryan Bingham, George Clooney&amp;#8217;s character from Up in the Air. The ultimate frequent flier, Bingham slides shoes and belt off, flips laptop from case, and aligns them neatly on the x-ray conveyor in a seamless, fluid display of security Tai Chi. He navigates from curb to gate and back with crisp efficiency, every motion practiced and automatic.
My envy was tempered somewhat as I reread Discipline and Punish on the trip back. Bingham&amp;#8217;s military precision, it struck me, was the product of a form of training implicit in the security process. As a corrective brace &amp;#8220;teaches&amp;#8221; the proper posture just by making it t...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3156445</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:42:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3156445</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Buck Stops with Obama</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3153351&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FTPYsXXl0820%2F</link>
            <description>By Roger PilonToday Politico Arena asks:
Do you feel safer from terrorism today than you did the day before? Assess Obama&amp;#8217;s response.

My response:
So Obama tells us that the buck stops with him.  Aides signaled that in saying that, Politico reports, the president &amp;#8220;was consciously seeking to be the anti-Bush, airing his administration&amp;#8217;s dirty laundry and stepping up to take his share of the responsibility.&amp;#8221;  Yet as Arena contributor Dana Perino notes in response, with evidence in hand, they don&amp;#8217;t even have their facts right.  Bush repeatedly took responsibility, and for good reason:  There was much to be responsible for, not least the creation of the intelligence bureaucracy that failed so clearly to connect the Christmas Day dots, as discussed in this ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3153351</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:28:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3153351</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Airport of Tomorrow</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3136696&amp;cid=t_107204_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2010%2F01%2F01%2Fthe-airport-of-tomorrow%2F</link>
            <description>New cartoon by Trussell &amp; Trussell on AOL’s Politics Daily. The Airport of Tomorrow.
Posted in Politics Daily Tagged: airport security, chaos theory, dhs, humor, political cartoon, terrorism, travel, tsa (Source: Donna Trussell)</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3136696</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:47:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3136696</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Security-by-Obscurity Is Weak</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3071141&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FngZjybVfQ4s%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperAnd we&amp;#8217;re better off when it fails this way than when we learn the hard way that someone found an exploit.
Watch for the TSA to give extra scrutiny to wheelchairs, casts, and orthopedic shoes now that the screening manual giving those items a pass has been released. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3071141</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:52:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3071141</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Net: Opinions and Temptations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2881292&amp;cid=t_107204_133_f&amp;fid=35096&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAutismVox%2F%7E3%2FrD6b9N3hKxA%2F</link>
            <description>The Net has certainly let loose the dogs of both support and criticism for some parents of children with ASD. In El Paso, Texas, parents and teachers around the world have chimed in regarding a 10-year-old with boy with Asperger&amp;#8217;s who got a ticket for $260 for disrupting class. Students can be ticketed and their parents fined in the state for such actions, and the mom says her son kept falling asleep in class, made noise in the hall, and got down on the floor and refused to get up. She agrees the behavior is not okay and that he should be punished, but she disagrees that this punishment was &amp;#8220;suitable&amp;#8221; for what her son did, claiming he he didn’t hurt anyone or break anything. The ticket was later dismissed. 
Local news outlet KFOX got several e-mails and comments rega...</description>
            <author>Autism Vox</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2881292</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:09:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2881292</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Schneier and Friends on Fixing Airport Security</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2515174&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FlQn07-pvhEw%2F</link>
            <description>Security guru Bruce Schneier comes down on the strictly pragmatic side in this essay called &amp;#8220;Fixing Airport Security.&amp;#8221; Because of terrorism fears, he says, TSA checkpoints are &amp;#8220;here to stay.&amp;#8221; The rules should be made more transparent. He also argues for an amendment to some constitutional doctrines:
The Constitution provides us, both Americans and visitors to America, with strong protections against invasive police searches. Two exceptions come into play at airport security checkpoints. The first is &amp;#8220;implied consent,&amp;#8221; which means that you cannot refuse to be searched; your consent is implied when you purchased your ticket. And the second is &amp;#8220;plain view,&amp;#8221; which means that if the TSA officer happens to see something unrelated to airport securit...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2515174</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:42:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2515174</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Congress on Privacy: Schizophrenic or Lagging?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2464091&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FnLsOla36C9Q%2F</link>
            <description>In the same bill that Congress limited the use of whole-body imaging or &amp;#8220;strip-search machines&amp;#8221; at airports (text of the amendment here), it required the Transportation Security Administration to study using facial and iris recognition to identify people in line for airport security checkpoints (Sec. 242 of House-passed version here).
So glimpses at de-identified bodies are a privacy outrage while massive biometric databases and records of people&amp;#8217;s travels are good to go?
Not necessarily. Average people (and members of Congress) understand better what a look at the body is, but they don&amp;#8217;t understand as well what biometric tracking and databasing of our movements means. So they&amp;#8217;re quick to object to the former and lagging on the latter.
Those of us who understa...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2464091</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:48:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2464091</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>It Is a Checkpoint, After All</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2441165&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FfDCvbF0AKow%2F</link>
            <description>The Philadelphia Inquirer asks why the TSA didn&amp;#8217;t catch Bonnie Sweeten absconding to Orlando at the airport after faking her own and her daughter&amp;#8217;s abduction.
The TSA and FBI are right: it&amp;#8217;s not airport security&amp;#8217;s job to look for people like Bonnie Sweeten. But they quickly agree to make it part of their mission when newspapers and Members of Congress start to say they should. This is how a nominal airline security program transmogrifies into a general law enforcement checkpoint, and the noose tightens on your right to travel. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2441165</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:25:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2441165</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Galling Security Ignorance</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2375862&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FYDuFAS_-0nE%2F</link>
            <description>In a post on Saturday at NRO&amp;#8217;s the Corner blog, former Bush speech writer Marc Theissen exhibits ignorance of basic security concepts too galling to let pass without comment.
Attempting to refute the idea that hijacking planes and flying them into buildings was &amp;#8220;off the table&amp;#8221; as a terrorist tactic after 9/11, Theissen says:
Really? Planes were off the table after 9/11? That would come as a surprise to every passenger in the past three years who had their liquids confiscated in an airport security line. Those security measures were instituted because in 2006 we foiled an al-Qaeda plot to hijack airplanes leaving London’s Heathrow airport and blow them up over the Atlantic (a plot our intelligence community says was just weeks from execution).
(First, put aside some issu...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2375862</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:38:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2375862</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Airport Xray Machines Designed to Expose Your Anxiety.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1844645&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthbolt.net%2F2008%2F09%2F30%2Fairport-xray-machines-designed-to-expose-your-anxiety%2F</link>
            <description>Once upon a time, the Xray machines at airports simply looked into your luggage and the only thing you had to worry about was whether it would mess up the film in your camera.
But with the new digital technology over the past couple of years, we no longer have to worry about putting exposed film into lead carry bags.
Instead we have now have to worry about how much airport Xrays are exposing of us.
Last year Backscatter Xray Screening was tested by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). This technology allows the machine to pretty much &amp;#8217;strip search&amp;#8217; passengers, of course only in a virtual way, to look for any sigs of contraband or weapons.
This year, Homeland Security Department unveiled an anxiety detecting Xray machine known as &amp;#8220;Future AttributeScreening Tec...</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1844645</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:32:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1844645</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Unique Travel Kit for People with Diabetes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=501622&amp;cid=t_107204_87_f&amp;fid=34867&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thediabetesblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F26%2Funique-travel-kit-for-people-with-diabetes%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: Type 1, Type 2, Childhood, Adult Onset, Lifestyle, Products, SupportHere are some fun travel facts about diabetes: an average Boeing 737 carries nearly 10 passengers who have diabetes. For every five cars on the road, there is one person with diabetes present. Whether you're going on a weekend getaway or a once-in-a-lifetime excursion across Europe, if you have diabetes, careful preparation is an essential component of getting ready for your trip.
Accu-check has put together a free resource guide for people with diabetes to help them travel with ease and confidence. It offers some tips, lists and suggestions to help them prepare for the journey and enjoy the ride, worry-free. The diabetes travel kit includes: a brochure detailing tips like proper handling of test supplies and ...</description>
            <author>The Diabetes Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=501622</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">501622</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

