<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: associated press</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'associated press'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22associated+press%22&t=%22associated+press%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:07:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Time for a Reality Check on the Trade Deficit</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4570530&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FyhHnxEePFbM%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel GriswoldThe U.S. trade deficit rose in January, according to this morning’s monthly trade report from the U.S. Commerce Department, and on cue the news is being greeted as a bad omen for the U.S. economy.
Reflecting the conventional wisdom, this morning’s Associated Press story states as a matter of fact, with no attribution:
A widening trade deficit hurts the U.S. economy. When imports outpace exports, more jobs go to foreign workers than to U.S. workers.
Oh really? As I’ve documented elsewhere, the U.S. economy actually grows faster during periods when the trade deficit is widening compared to when it is shrinking. That’s because an expanding economy increases demand for imports as well as domestically made goods. Stronger growth also attracts more foreign investment, w...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4570530</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:06:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4570530</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hey Tipper and Al: Why Divorce After 40 Years?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4121918&amp;cid=t_92009_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F10%2F31%2Fhey-tipper-and-al-why-divorce-after-40-years%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;m the skeptical, jaded type who believes the passionate kiss former Vice President Al Gore and his wife Tipper exchanged in front of the Democratic National Convention in July of 2004 was most likely staged. But I am truly puzzled, with the rest of America, on why a couple who seemed so together is now splitting after 40 years.
I&amp;#8217;m not only puzzled, but also disheartened. Because I respect and admire couples who have made it beyond their silver anniversary. Like everyone else confused by the Gores decision, I suppose I attach a layer of immunity to the partners who&amp;#8217;ve raised their kids, launching them successfully. Now they are safe to buy that double burial lot because, like or not, they are sticking together.

No so, says Betsey Stevenson, an economist at the Universi...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4121918</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:53:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4121918</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How The Swedish Mammography Study Should’ve Been Analyzed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4036649&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fhow-the-swedish-mammography-study-shouldve-been-analyzed%2F2010.10.05</link>
            <description>We reviewed four stories on the Swedish mammography study that appeared in the journal Cancer last week. Three of the four stories gave a pretty clear indication that there were methodological concerns about the Swedish research (of the four reviewed, only HealthDay offered no such hint):
• 4th paragraph of AP story: &amp;#8220;The new study has major limitations and cannot account for possibly big differences in the groups of women it compares.&amp;#8221;
• 1st paragraph of LA Times blog story: &amp;#8220;Critics charged that the study was poorly designed and potentially vastly misleading.&amp;#8221;
• 2nd sentence of NY Times story: &amp;#8220;Results were greeted with skepticism by some experts who say they may have overestimated the benefit.&amp;#8221;
But none of the stories did a very complete job of ...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4036649</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:00:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4036649</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>KFF/HRET Survey, Part III: Employers Can’t Shift to Workers a Cost that Workers Already Bear</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4013137&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FGw1wIjQHXrQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Michael F. CannonIn a previous post, I promised to address the negative spin that the Kaiser Family Foundation put on its annual Employer Health Benefits Survey, released this month.  I do so in an op-ed that ran today at the Daily Caller.  An excerpt:
The Kaiser Family Foundation recently issued its annual survey of employer-sponsored health benefits, declaring: “Family Health Premiums Rise 3 Percent to $13,770 in 2010, But Workers’ Share Jumps 14 Percent as Firms Shift Cost Burden.” That’s half-right — but the other half perpetuates a myth about employee health benefits that stands in the way of real health care reform&amp;#8230;.
[Y]ou pay the full cost of your health benefits: partly through an explicit $4,000 premium and partly because your wages are $9,770 lower than ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4013137</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:07:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4013137</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Apple to introduce guidelines for the apps</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3954485&amp;cid=t_92009_150_f&amp;fid=38374&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FePharmaSummit%2F%7E3%2FxGq4jRrjEQw%2Fapple-to-introduce-guidelines-for-apps.html</link>
            <description>After two years of little guidance, Apple has announced that it will introduce guidelines for Applications in its App store, as reported by the Associated Press. There are are currently over 250,000 apps available. For the past two years, the developers of these programs would submit their applications with no structure during development, leaving some with Apps that were not approved. Also, they've lifted the ban on using third-party development tools that ''translate'' code written for another platform. Will this encourage more apps from Pharma companies that will allow the digital tracking of health to increase?This blog is co-posted with Community 2.0. (Source: ePharma Summit)</description>
            <author>ePharma Summit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3954485</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:56:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3954485</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>JAMA’s Breast And Ovarian Cancer Article: Getting The Facts Straight</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3946452&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fjamas-breast-and-ovarian-cancer-article-getting-the-facts-straight%2F2010.09.08</link>
            <description>Journalist Andrew Holtz has been a colleague for longer than probably either one of us wants to remember. He is currently one of our story reviewers on HealthNewsReview.org. In fact, he was one of the reviewers on four stories we analyzed last week on the same study. He thought there were some important take-home messages that rose above the walls of our formal systematic review, so he wrote this guest blog post, and we thank him for it:
The Sept. 1 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association included an article that is likely to have a strong influence on the advice given to women who have a very high risk of breast and ovarian cancer linked to mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Of the four stories we reviewed, only the AP report scored well on our review criteria.
I kno...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3946452</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:00:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3946452</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Global Cost Of Fighting Cancer</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3895891&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fthe-global-cost-of-fighting-cancer%2F2010.08.23</link>
            <description>Cancer is the world&amp;#8217;s costliest disease, sapping the equivalent of 1.5 percent of the global gross domestic product through disability and loss of life, according to the American Cancer Society (ACS). Cancer cost $895 billion in 2008, and that&amp;#8217;s before factoring in the cost of treating cancer.
Cancer and other chronic diseases cost more than infectious diseases and even AIDS, according to a report the ACS [presented last] week. While chronic diseases are 60 percent of all deaths globally, they receive only 3 percent of private and public research funding. The organization is calling for a new look at priorities by the United Nations and the World Health Organization. (Associated Press)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at ACP Internist* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3895891</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3895891</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Emergency Medicine Dilemma: Risk Malpractice Or Overtesting?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3726596&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Femergency-medicine-dilemma-risk-malpractice-or-overtesting%2F2010.07.05</link>
            <description>Emergency physicians are in a dilemma. Risk missing a diagnosis and be sued, or be criticized for overtesting.
Regular readers of this blog, along with many other physicians’ blogs, are familiar with the difficult choices facing doctors in the emergency department.
The Associated Press, continuing its excellent series on overtesting, discusses how lawsuit fears is a leading driver of unnecessary tests. Consider chest pain, one of the most common presenting symptoms in the ER:
Patients with suspected heart attacks often get the range of what the ER offers, from multiple blood tests that can quickly add up in cost, to X-rays and EKGs, to costly CT scans, which are becoming routine in some hospital ERs for diagnosing heart attacks …
… and the battery of testing may be paying off: A few...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3726596</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:00:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3726596</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Too Much Testing And Treatment? Try Superb Primary Care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671699&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Ftoo-much-testing-and-treatment-try-superb-primary-care%2F2010.06.16</link>
            <description>The Associated Press has been running a fantastic series of must reads with the latest article highlighting the consequence of too many imaging studies, like X-rays and CT scans, which are the biggest contributor to an individual&amp;#8217;s total radiation exposure in a lifetime. Americans get more imaging radiation exposure and testing than people from other industrialized countries.
Reasons for doing too many tests include malpractice fear, patient demands for imaging, the difficulty in obtaining imaging results from other doctors or hospitals, as well as advanced technologies, like coronary angioplasty, which have increased radiation but avoid a far more invasive surgery like heart bypass. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Saving Money and Surviving the Heal...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671699</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671699</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Unnecessary Tests And Treatments: Responsible Reporting Can Help</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3662674&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Funnecessary-tests-and-treatments-responsible-reporting-can-help%2F2010.06.14</link>
            <description>Just when I’ve lost hope that mainstream media will stop perpetuating the myth the more medicine equals better care, the Associated Press came up with this excellent piece. The article states, rightly, that “anywhere from one-fifth to nearly one-third of the tests and treatments we get are estimated to be unnecessary,” and that, “it may lead to dangerous side effects.”
Regular readers of this blog should be familiar with those concepts. I wrote recently that patients often reject evidence-based medicine. One reason is that there aren&amp;#8217;t enough clinical guidelines available for patients to make an informed decision. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at KevinMD.com* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3662674</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:00:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3662674</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fidel Castro Endorses ObamaCare</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3411088&amp;cid=t_92009_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FLox5rixfciM%2F</link>
            <description>By Michael F. CannonAs Dave Barry would say, I swear I am not making this up.
Yesterday, the Associated Press reported that the world&amp;#8217;s last unreconstructed communist dictator endorsed President Obama&amp;#8217;s new health care law:
HAVANA (AP) — It perhaps was not the endorsement President Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress were looking for.
Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro on Thursday declared passage of American health care reform &amp;#8220;a miracle&amp;#8221; and a major victory for Obama&amp;#8217;s presidency, but couldn&amp;#8217;t help chide the United States for taking so long to enact what communist Cuba achieved decades ago.
&amp;#8220;We consider health reform to have been an important battle and a success of his (Obama&amp;#8217;s) government,&amp;#8221; Castro wrote in an essay pub...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3411088</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:55:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3411088</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Floods in Manila, Capital City of the Philippines: Ways to Donate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4642968&amp;cid=t_92009_145_f&amp;fid=35710&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fksdescartin.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F09%2F28%2Ffloods-in-manila-capital-city-of-the-philippines-ways-to-donate%2F</link>
            <description>Typhoon Ondoy hits the capital city of Metro Manila, Philippines very recently.




Maps via Google.
Here are some links to the news:


China View [with photos]
New York Times [via Associated Press]
Philippine Daily Inquirer [one of Philippines' national newspaper]
Here&amp;#8217;s a link to a video of the said floods in various areas of the the metropolis.

[video via INITIATE 360 on YouTube]
Ways to donate towards supporting work that assist Typhoon Ondoy victims in the Philippines:
1.  TXTPower [magbayanihan@yahoo.com.ph]
This is a Philippine listed organization. There is a possibility that donations coming from the U.S. are not tax deductible, in case that is a concern. However, they have a Paypal account—thus, very convenient.
Please do your own research about the organization. I did m...</description>
            <author>the story of healing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4642968</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:42:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4642968</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mentally Ill Violence in Nursing Homes?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2287232&amp;cid=t_92009_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F03%2F23%2Fmentally-ill-violent-in-nursing-homes%2F</link>
            <description>In yet another example of sensationalism posing as legitimate journalism, the Associated Press&amp;#8217;s Carla K. Johnson penned an article over the weekend calling people with mental illness who live in nursing homes a &amp;#8220;threat.&amp;#8221; What kind of threat? Well, according to the article, it appears to be the usual one, drawing an unscientific and unsupported link between mental illness and violence:

Over the past several years, nursing homes have become dumping grounds for young and middle-age people with mental illness, according to Associated Press interviews and an analysis of data from all 50 states. And that has proved a prescription for violence, as Jackson&amp;#8217;s case and others across the country illustrate.
Younger, stronger residents with schizophrenia, depression or bipola...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2287232</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:31:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2287232</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Virtual colonoscopy - ready for prime time?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1806604&amp;cid=t_92009_117_f&amp;fid=36026&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.healthtalk.com%2Fzimney%2Fvirtual-colonoscopy-ready-for-prime-time%2F</link>
            <description>Virtual colonoscopy is an x-ray examination of the colon used to screen for cancer. It is also called CT colonography because the x-ray test used is a CT scan (also called computed tomography or CAT scan for computed axial tomography). Virtual colonoscopy is in the news because of a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that compared the x-ray test to traditional colonoscopy and found comparable results in terms of identifying abnormal growths. But while the headlines will tout the positive findings, there are a few things you should know before undergoing one of these procedures.
First off let me say that screening for colon cancer is an extremely important and life-saving yet underutilized undertaking that I&amp;#8217;ve written about before, and which you should unde...</description>
            <author>Dr. Z's Medical Report</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1806604</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:29:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1806604</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Many colon cancer patients don’t get proper follow-up</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1779892&amp;cid=t_92009_117_f&amp;fid=36026&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.healthtalk.com%2Fzimney%2Fmany-colon-cancer-patients-dont-get-proper-follow-up%2F</link>
            <description>After surgery for colon cancer, you are still at risk, both for cancer recurrence and for development of another new colon cancer. Because of this it’s important for colon cancer survivors to be followed closely and monitored carefully. But new research has found that many such survivors aren’t getting the proper follow-up care. And it looks as though the fault lies more with the doctors than it does with the patients. If you or someone you love is a colon cancer survivor, it’s important to know the guidelines for follow-up in order to ensure you’re getting the right tests.
In the study, published online in the journal Cancer on September 8, 2008 - only 40 percent of colon cancer survivors who were followed for three years had all the right doctor visits and tests. But since 92 per...</description>
            <author>Dr. Z's Medical Report</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1779892</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:05:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1779892</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Associated Press Says “Mentally Retarded” Is Outdated Term</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1556400&amp;cid=t_92009_133_f&amp;fid=35096&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAutismVox%2F%7E3%2F323381501%2F</link>
            <description>The latest update of the Associated Press Stylebook says, no more using &amp;#8220;mentally retarded&amp;#8221; (&amp;#8221;mentally disabled&amp;#8221; is preferred). Notes Gawker:
Journo-nerds rejoice: the AP Stylebook has been updated! It&amp;#8217;s the Bible of all that is considered acceptable in middle American newsrooms, and, like middle America itself, is consistently several years behind the times.
Make that at least several years behind&amp;#8230;&amp;#8230;&amp;#8230;
Tags: asd, asperger, associated press, autism, autism blog, disabilities blog, disability, Family, family blog, Language, Parenting, pdd-nos, styleShare This (Source: Autism Vox)</description>
            <author>Autism Vox</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1556400</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:00:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1556400</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Battle Over Online Content</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1546976&amp;cid=t_92009_147_f&amp;fid=35750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FHealthCareVox%2F%7E3%2F320638605%2Fthe_battle_over_online_content.html</link>
            <description>Earlier this month, the blogosphere &amp;ndash; and to a lesser extent the Twittersphere &amp;ndash; was blazing with news that the Associated Press was pressing bloggers to take down content it felt was in violation of copyright law.&amp;nbsp; Not only were bloggers annoyed that the Associated Press made this request, but they contended that AP routinely cribbed content from bloggers, but failed to credit them for their work. The Associated Press soon backed down, but the AP-blogosphere flap is only a taste of what some are saying will be a war between producers of user-generated content and the mainstream media.&amp;nbsp; According to BusinessWeek: &amp;ldquo;The dustup between the AP and bloggers was just an early skirmish in what&amp;#39;s likely to become a protracted war over how and where media content is ...</description>
            <author>HealthCareVox</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1546976</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:13:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1546976</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Media In Medicine: The Big Guns Are On It</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1253247&amp;cid=t_92009_145_f&amp;fid=35710&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fstoryofhealing.com%2F2008%2F02%2F25%2Fmedia-in-medicine-the-big-guns-are-on-it%2F</link>
            <description>Before I share the main course for today, let me first touch base with the chosen labels for our endless babble involving technology&amp;#8217;s role in potentially enhancing or carrying medicine and health care to the next better level—Media, Medicine 2.0 and Health 2.0. I initially have veered away from the latter term in my previous posts as I would like to apply my time more on Media (being mostly new media) and Medicine 2.0. These are more tangible to my focus at this point. I wanted to alleviate the great confusion these digital surnames bring us all. Though further on, I also realized that I too have to be educated on what these terms entail. The differences in detail between the two are also important. We could all learn something new everyday. That said, what is Medicine 2.0 and Hea...</description>
            <author>the story of healing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1253247</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:51:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1253247</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Health Care Commotion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1221288&amp;cid=t_92009_145_f&amp;fid=35710&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fstoryofhealing.com%2F2008%2F02%2F10%2Fthe-health-care-commotion%2F</link>
            <description>Michael Moore&amp;#8217;s Sicko was just one of the manifestations of many Americans&amp;#8217; seeming discontent on the current status of its policies affecting health care. All of a sudden, there is this more-than-romantic urgency to get packing for France! Or quite simply, curse the insurance companies.
This so called commotion has started long before the movies came out. And now, it is election time. Along with these varied degrees and reasons for this noise, there is this apparent expression of the desire to see changes. Among a gamut of issues in town, health care is one closest to the heart and probably the first card people want laid out on the table by the candidates.
Is America&amp;#8217;s health care going to change? How is America&amp;#8217;s health care going to change? Where will the next l...</description>
            <author>the story of healing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1221288</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:09:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1221288</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Master Cleanse debate on radio talk show</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1175087&amp;cid=t_92009_117_f&amp;fid=36026&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.healthtalk.com%2Fzimney%2Fmaster-cleanse-debate-on-radio-talk-show%2F</link>
            <description>I have written many times about the Master Cleanse program in this blog (links provided at the end of this post). My comments have been covered by the Associated Press and are also on Wikipedia. Most recently, however, was a radio talk show virtual debate between Peter Glickman, a major proponent of the Master Cleanse, and myself, taking a more negative position.
The program aired live on Saturday January 19, 2008 on KCRW, a public radio station in Los Angeles. The show was part of a weekly food program called Good Food, hosted by Evan Kleiman. But if you’re interested, you can access the show’s archive at any time simply by visiting the KCRW web page. When you get there, you’ll find a description of the entire show, including all the guests. Near the top of the page, under the date,...</description>
            <author>Dr. Z's Medical Report</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1175087</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:49:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1175087</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

