<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: background check</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'background check'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22background+check%22&t=%22background+check%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:30:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Why Every Pregnant Woman Needs To Do A Background Check</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4405774&amp;cid=t_215788_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fwhy-every-pregnant-woman-needs-to-do-a-background-check%2F2011.01.27</link>
            <description>The journey to a healthy pregnancy and delivery begins with the selection of a healthcare provider, and the challenge is to find the right one. This is the person who will be in charge of your pregnancy up until the time of the delivery, so it certainly is not a casual date. For the next 280 days your life and the life of your unborn child will be in this person’s hands. A background check is therefore in order.
One of the best ways to find the right healthcare provider is by word-of-mouth referral from neighbors, friends, or family members however please don’t stop there. Labor and delivery nurses are also a great source of referral because they have seen physicians and midwives under their most vulnerable and challenging moments.
Don&amp;#8217;t feel intimidated about checking a provide...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4405774</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:00:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4405774</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ending the Black Market in Low-skilled Labor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3429160&amp;cid=t_215788_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FNAy9l6EF2gI%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel GriswoldAlex Nowrasteh and Ryan Young of the Competitive Enterprise Institute make the case for immigration reform in an especially appealing way in a fresh op-ed this week in the Detroit News.
In a commentary article titled, “Fix immigration rules to crush black market,” they dissect a well-meaning but flawed Obama administration effort to fix the dysfunctional H-2A visa program for temporary farm workers. Instead of fine tuning an unworkable law, Nowrasteh and Young advocate liberalization:
That means making H-2A visas inexpensive, easy to obtain, and keeping the related paperwork and regulations to a minimum. That means no minimum wage hike. No costly background check requirements. People rarely break laws that are reasonable and easy to obey.
When legal channels cost too ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3429160</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:42:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3429160</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Would PASS ID Really Save States Money?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2630054&amp;cid=t_215788_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FpHXPcnkCiBc%2F</link>
            <description>The proposed PASS ID Act is a national ID just like REAL ID, and it threatens privacy just as much. Some argue that a national ID under PASS ID should be palatable, though, because it reduces costs to states.
But savings to states under PASS ID are not at all clear. Let’s take a look at the costs of creating a U.S. national ID.
The REAL ID Act, passed in May 2005, required states to begin implementing a national ID system within three years. In regulations it proposed in March 2007, the Department of Homeland Security extended that draconian deadline. States would have five years, starting in May 2008, to move all driver&amp;#8217;s license and ID card holders into REAL ID-compliant cards.
The Department of Homeland Security estimated the costs for this project at $17.2 billion dollars (net ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2630054</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:46:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2630054</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Questions for Heritage: REAL ID</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2389659&amp;cid=t_215788_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FjhwD7iG_CAc%2F</link>
            <description>The Heritage Foundation&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;The Foundry&amp;#8221; blog has a post up called &amp;#8220;Questions for Secretary Napolitano: Real ID.&amp;#8221;
Honest advocates on two sides of an issue can come to almost perfectly opposite views, and this provides an example, because I find the post confused, wrong, or misleading in nearly every respect.
Let&amp;#8217;s give it a brief fisking. Below, the language from the post is in italics, and my comments are in roman text:
Does the Obama Administration support the implementation of the Real ID Act?
(Hope not . . . .)
Congress has passed two bills that set Real ID standards for driver’s licenses in all U.S. jurisdictions.
REAL ID was a federal law that Congress passed in haste as an attachment to a military spending bill in early 2005. To me, &amp;#8220;REAL ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2389659</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:38:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2389659</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>U.S. Chamber on Electronic Employment Verification</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2306742&amp;cid=t_215788_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F5jD7vZ_jCwM%2F</link>
            <description>The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has a new paper out on electronic employment verification systems. Using government estimates, it finds that operating a nationwide worker background check system would cost $10 billion a year.
The Chamber is no opponent of requiring employers to check workers&amp;#8217; immigration status &amp;#8212; I oppose the policy, preferring to live in a free country &amp;#8212; but the paper has a lot of information about the practical impediments to giving the federal government a say in every hiring decision.
It also gives the last word to my paper, Electronic Employment Eligibility: Franz Kafka&amp;#8217;s Solution to Illegal Immigration. In the paper, I discuss a method for verifying work eligibility under the current immigration law without creating a national identity system. It...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2306742</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:22:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2306742</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Audit Reveals Failures in SC Department of Disabilities and Special Needs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2011194&amp;cid=t_215788_133_f&amp;fid=35096&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAutismVox%2F%7E3%2F7N4v9CZX5V4%2F</link>
            <description>An audit of the South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs has reported numerous oversights including failures to follow up on up on safety violations and insufficient efforts to keep abusers off facility payrolls, yesterday&amp;#8217;s Associated Press (via the Courier Post) reports.
The audit recommends Disabilities and Special Needs require fingerprinting and FBI national background checks for caregivers, not just a check through the South Carolina State Law Enforcement Division. The agency said it would consider the feasibility of fingerprint checks.
Meanwhile, the agency isn&amp;#8217;t doing enough to check references. It &amp;#8220;does not have an adequate system to ensure that direct caregivers who are dismissed for consumer safety-related disciplinary infractions are not reh...</description>
            <author>Autism Vox</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2011194</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:00:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2011194</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

