<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: balanced</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'balanced'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22balanced%22&t=%22balanced%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:59:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>New CBO Numbers Confirm – Once Again – that Modest Spending Restraint Can Balance the Budget</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5158943&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FkYybUa_rHFo%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellThe Congressional Budget Office has just released the update to its Economic and Budget Outlook.
There are several things from this new report that probably deserve commentary, including a new estimate that unemployment will &amp;#8220;remain above 8 percent until 2014.&amp;#8221;
This certainly doesn&amp;#8217;t reflect well on the Obama White House, which claimed that flushing $800 billion down the Washington rathole would prevent the joblessness rate from ever climbing above 8 percent.
Not that I have any faith in CBO estimates. After all, those bureaucrats still embrace Keynesian economics.
But this post is not about the backwards economics at CBO. Instead, I want to look at the new budget forecast and see what degree of fiscal discipline is necessary to get rid of red ink.
Th...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5158943</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:34:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5158943</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) Headline Results from Years 1 and 2 (combined)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5139642&amp;cid=t_101784_86_f&amp;fid=36669&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffadelibrary.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F17%2Fnational-diet-and-nutrition-survey-ndns-headline-results-from-years-1-and-2-combined%2F</link>
            <description>Title: National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) Headline Results from Years 1 and 2 (combined)


Scan or click to download &amp;#8216;National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) Headline Results from Years 1 and 2 (combined)&amp;#8217;

The Skinny: Key findings
The findings show that the overall picture of the diet and nutrition of the UK population is broadly similar to previous surveys in the NDNS series carried out between 1994 and 2001. The analyses presented in this report do not identify any new nutritional problems in the general population.

Adults (aged 19 to 64 years), consumed on average 4.2 portions of fruit and vegetables per day and older adults (aged 65 years and over) consumed 4.4 portions. Thirty per cent of adults and 37 per cent of older adults met the ‘five-a-day’ recommenda...</description>
            <author>Fade Library</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5139642</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:16:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5139642</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Commissioning healthier catering and hospitality: Investing in a healthy workforce – guidance to help specify healthier catering and hospitality</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5130650&amp;cid=t_101784_86_f&amp;fid=36669&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffadelibrary.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F15%2Fcommissioning-healthier-catering-and-hospitality-investing-in-a-healthy-workforce-%25e2%2580%2593-guidance-to-help-specify-healthier-catering-and-hospitality%2F</link>
            <description>Title: Commissioning healthier catering and hospitality: Investing in a healthy workforce &amp;#8211; guidance to help specify healthier catering and hospitality
Click or scan to download Commissioning healthier catering and hospitality: Investing in a healthy workforce - guidance to help specify healthier catering and hospitality
The Skinny: Report from the North West Food &amp; Health Taskforce that offers guidance in specifying healthier catering and hospitality with in the NHS. It also considers issues of sustainability and fair trade.
Publisher: North West Food &amp; Health Taskforce
Published: March 2006
Size: 136p.
Published: May 2011
Filed under: Ooops Missed Category! Tagged: Balanced diet, Catering, Commissioning, Contract catering, Food preparation, Food purchasing, Grey Literature,...</description>
            <author>Fade Library</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5130650</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:57:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5130650</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>I’m Willing to Go Along with President Obama’s ‘Balanced Approach’ to Deficit Reduction, but Only if We Use Honest Math</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5008147&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FFLm7kkThP6Y%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellThe President has issued an ultimatum that more tax revenue must be part of budget negotiations. Indeed, he endlessly repeats his desire for a “balanced approach,” implying that as much as 50 percent of the deficit reduction in any agreement should come from higher revenues.
Because I am a thoughtful, middle-of-the-road, pragmatic guy, I’m willing to accept the President’s ultimatum. I do have one tiny request, however, and that is for any such deal to be based on honest math.
What I mean by this is that I don’t want politicians to approve a budget that results in more spending, but then claim that they “cut spending” because the budget didn’t grow even faster. I want a spending cut to mean less spending (gee, what a novel idea).
And when they talk abou...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5008147</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:57:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5008147</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Senate Vote on Rand Paul’s Budget</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4883556&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F4gQD5uysK4k%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenLast week, a motion to proceed on a budget resolution introduced by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) was decisively defeated in the Senate (7 in favor, 90 opposed). Paul’s proposal would have balanced the budget in five years (fiscal year 2016) through spending cuts and no tax increases. Social Security and Medicare would not have been altered. Instead, the proposal merely instructed relevant congressional committees to enact reforms that would achieve &amp;#8220;solvency&amp;#8221; over a 75-year window.
That’s hardly radical.
Paul’s proposed spending cuts were certainly bold by Washington’s standards, but they weren’t radical either. For example, military spending would have been cut, in part, by reducing the government’s bootprint abroad. From the Paul proposal:
The ability to ut...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4883556</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:14:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4883556</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Could Technical Default Today Save America from Greek-Style Fiscal Disaster in the Future?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4828862&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FIwlo5uy3QJk%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellThere&amp;#8217;s a lot of buzz about a Wall Street Journal interview with Stanley Druckenmiller, in which he argues that a temporary delay in making payments on U.S. government debt (which technically would be a default) would be a small price to pay if it resulted in the long-term spending reforms that are needed to save America from becoming another Greece.
One of the world&amp;#8217;s most successful money managers, the lanky, sandy-haired Mr. Druckenmiller is so concerned about the government&amp;#8217;s ability to pay for its future obligations that he&amp;#8217;s willing to accept a temporary delay in the interest payments he&amp;#8217;s owed on his U.S. Treasury bonds—if the result is a Washington deal to restrain runaway entitlement costs. &amp;#8220;I think technical default would...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4828862</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:48:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4828862</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Updated Cato Budget Plan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4753669&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FEWH5eRgfepA%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenOver at Downsizing the Federal Government, Chris Edwards has released an updated version of his &amp;#8220;Plan to Cut Spending and Balance the Federal Budget.&amp;#8221; The plan proposes spending cuts of more than $1 trillion annually by 2021, which would balance the budget without resorting to damaging tax increases. Federal spending would be reduced to 18 percent of gross domestic product by 2021 under the plan, which compares to President Obama&amp;#8217;s projected spending that year of 24.2 percent of GDP.


Some key points:

No sacred cows are spared.   Defense, domestic, and so-called entitlement programs are all cut.


The plan recognizes that   the scope of federal activities must be curtailed. It would begin the reversal   of decades of federal expansion into hundreds of area...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4753669</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:10:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4753669</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can weight loss boost memory?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4724050&amp;cid=t_101784_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2FZkidvf57iq0%2F</link>
            <description>In the past few days you may have come across headlines claiming that weight loss can improve memory. If so, you may be wondering what to make of this.
Let’s take a brief look at the study at the origin of these articles. Participants were 109 bariatric surgery patients and 41 obese people (controls) who had not undergone surgery. Bariatric surgery refers mostly to gastric bypass surgery, which creates a smaller stomach and bypasses part of the small intestine. The bariatric patients were enrolled in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery project conducted, among others, by researchers at Kent State university and Columbia University.
The memory of the 150 participants was assessed before the surgery as well as 12 weeks after. Results showed that the memory of the surgery patie...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4724050</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:02:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4724050</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Budget Plan from Conservative House Members Would Do Best Job of Shrinking the Burden of Federal Spending</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4684261&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FtbAiJU8RsZk%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellJust days after the introduction of a very good plan by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, leaders from the Republican Study Committee in the House of Representatives have introduced an even better plan.
In a previous post, I compared spending levels from the Obama budget and the Ryan budget and showed that the burden of federal spending would rise much faster if the White House plan was adopted.
If the goal is to restrain government, the RSC blueprint is the best of all worlds. As the chart illustrates, government only grows by an average of 1.7 percent annually with that plan, compared to an average of 2.8 percent growth under Ryan's good budget and 4.7 percent average growth with Obama's head-in-the-sand proposal.

According to the numbers released by the R...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4684261</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:03:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4684261</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to Find Balance in Life</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4658650&amp;cid=t_101784_180_f&amp;fid=38612&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fpickthebrain%2FLYVv%2F%7E3%2FL2ApoMP4M1s%2F</link>
            <description>Most people have enjoyed great successes in some parts of their lives. The problem is that most of us neglect some parts to succeed in others. Doing this corrodes your success and will over time start hurting your future chances.
If you do not find balance and succeed in all 4 areas you will start to deteriorate in all.
The Four Major Areas of Your Life Are: 
Health
Family
Career
Finances
How they work together:
All aspects of your life work in tandem. Success in one area will spill over to another, but on the other hand neglect will destroy your success in any of the other areas of your life.
Some examples of problems that can arise if you don’t take care of all areas 
Health –&amp;gt; Relationships –&amp;gt; Career –&amp;gt; Finance
If you let your health slide your energy levels deteriorate...</description>
            <author>PickTheBrain | Motivation and Self Improvement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4658650</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:12:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4658650</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Are Republicans Thinking?!?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4642577&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FDUAjXcfKZ1Y%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellI posted recently at International Liberty about the stunning political incompetence of Republican Senators, who reportedly are willing to give Obama an increase in the debt limit in exchange for a vote (yes, just a vote) on a balanced budget amendment.
As I explained, there is no way they can get the necessary two-thirds support to approve an amendment, so why trade a meaningless and symbolic vote on a BBA for meaningful and real approval of more borrowing authority for Obama? My analogy yesterday was that this was like trading an all-star baseball player for a utility infielder in the minor leagues.
I did acknowledge that forcing a vote on a BBA was a worthwhile endeavor, but said that the GOP has that power anyhow, so why trade away something valuable to get somethi...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4642577</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:29:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4642577</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rand Paul’s Balanced Budget Plan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4622231&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FZ_y95HAocHs%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenSen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has released a detailed plan that would balance the federal budget in five years. Paul’s plan would achieve balance by halting and reversing the historic rise in federal spending. Taxes would not be increased, but revenues would steadily increase as the economy recovers.
The following charts compare Paul’s plan versus President Obama’s recent budget submission for fiscal 2012:


While Obama intends to continue spending at a historically high level, Paul would reduce spending as a share of the economy. Paul takes the scalpel to all areas of federal spending, including discretionary, defense, and mandatory. However, it is not a radical plan. In fact, it’s a practical, common sense budget that recognizes that the federal government’s growth has be...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4622231</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:51:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4622231</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Who’s Afraid of an Amendments Convention?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4436736&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FYLO-_XEBUf0%2F</link>
            <description>By Ilya ShapiroThose of us who are upset at how &quot;constitutional law&quot; has gotten far away from the text of the Constitution have more options than just hoping the judiciary tosses us an occasional bone and otherwise writing law review articles and op-eds.  We can also amend the Constitution!
Indeed, the Framers provided a method of constitutional amendment that is easy to understand (if not to execute, at least not since the New Deal Congress and FDR began de facto amending the Constitution without bothering to amend it de jure).  Article V says that an amendment can be sent to the states for ratification upon approval by two thirds of both houses of Congress.  In the alternative, two thirds of the state legislatures can call for an amending convention.  Either way, the resulting prop...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4436736</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 04:41:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4436736</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New CBO Numbers Re-Confirm that Balancing the Budget Is Simple with Modest Fiscal Restraint</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4405756&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fi_fqsUVGRmQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellMany of the politicians in Washington, including President Obama during his State of the Union address, piously tell us that there is no way to balance the budget without tax increases. Trying to get rid of red ink without higher taxes, they tell us, would require &amp;#8220;savage&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;draconian&amp;#8221; budget cuts.
I would like to slash the budget and free up resources for private-sector growth, so that sounds good to me. But what&amp;#8217;s the truth?
The Congressional Budget Office has just released its 10-year projections for the budget, so I crunched the numbers to determine what it would take to balance the budget without tax hikes. Much to nobody&amp;#8217;s surprise, the politicians are not telling the truth.
The chart below shows that revenues are expected t...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4405756</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:00:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4405756</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: January 11, 2011</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4338024&amp;cid=t_101784_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F01%2F11%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-january-11-2011%2F</link>
            <description>Today is 1/11/11. Maybe for you, it will be a day filled with firsts.
The first time you sought therapy. The first step you took towards healing yourself. The first time you realized how far you&amp;#8217;ve come and how much you have achieved towards your goals and your mental health.
If so, I hope you will celebrate these firsts and remember them when times get tough. Because ever year brings with it a new challenge, an obstacle we didn&amp;#8217;t foresee and with it an opportunity for self-growth and a chance for a better more balanced life. When that opportunity comes, will you take it?
For me, I&amp;#8217;ve finally come home. The holidays are over. And instead of being surrounded by the voices of my family members, I&amp;#8217;m here sitting back at my home in silence.
This Christmas was as chaotic...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4338024</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:02:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4338024</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tax Loopholes Are Corrupt and Inefficient, but They Should only Be Eliminated if Every Penny of New Revenue Is Used to Lower Tax Rates</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4197040&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F_3IzcUQDY4Q%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellThere&amp;#8217;s been a lot of heated discussion about various preferences, deductions, credits, shelters, and other loopholes in the tax code. Some of this debate has revolved around whether it is legitimate to refer to these provisions as &amp;#8220;tax expenditures&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;subsidies.&amp;#8221;
Michael Cannon vociferously argues that subsidies and expenditures only occur when the government takes money from person A and gives it to person B. On the other side of the debate are people like Josh Barro of the Manhattan Institute, who argues that tax preferences are akin to subsidies or expenditures since they can be just as damaging as government spending programs when looking at whether resources are efficiently allocated.
Since I&amp;#8217;m a can&amp;#8217;t-we-all-get-along,...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4197040</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:28:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4197040</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama’s Fiscal Commission and Health Care Spending</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4159219&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FujSpzFqXP-E%2F</link>
            <description>By Michael F. CannonFollowing up on what Dan and Chris have said &amp;#8230;
If the co-chairs of President Obama&amp;#8217;s fiscal commission were serious about reducing federal spending and deficits, they would have proposed eliminating the federal deficit, rather than &amp;#8220;reduc[ing] it to 2.2 percent of GDP by 2015.&amp;#8221;  Yawn. They would have proposed cutting federal spending (currently, 24 percent of GDP and rising) to match federal tax revenue (currently at 15 percent of GDP).  But the co-chairs proposed only to &amp;#8220;bring spending down to 22 percent and eventually 21 percent of GDP.&amp;#8221;  Not only does that elicit another yawn, but since the co-chairs only asked for half a loaf, they won&amp;#8217;t even get that much.
If the co-chairs were serious about reducing federal spending ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4159219</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:55:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4159219</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Are You a Mental Slave or a Mental Master?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4119788&amp;cid=t_101784_180_f&amp;fid=38612&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fpickthebrain%2FLYVv%2F%7E3%2FLCjYE0Of-F0%2F</link>
            <description>“Anyone here look like slave to you?”
In the eighties there was a hilarious BBC comedy sketch series called The Real McCoy and one of my favourite clips was from Miss Rees (Miserys!) West Indian Restaurant.
In one scene, a customer sits down and waits for the waitress to take his order. She rolls her eyes, sucks her teeth and asks “Anyone here look like slaaave to you?” (see video @ 3 minutes 31 onwards)
This lady knew she was beholden to no-one and took it to the extreme. But on a serious note, I think there is an awful lot of modern day slavery going on it our heads.
As Jean Jacques Rousseau said “Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains.” Of course, I am talking about psychological chains and as the apostle Peter said in 2 Pet 2: 191 “a man is a slave to whateve...</description>
            <author>PickTheBrain | Motivation and Self Improvement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4119788</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:34:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4119788</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Would You Trade Higher Taxes for Much Lower Spending and Less Red Tape?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4036631&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F0DmXBgK2qaY%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellI dislike taxes as much as the next person (and probably a lot more), but other policies matter as well, so if I had the choice of replacing current government policies with the ones that existed at the end of the Clinton years, I would gladly make that trade. Yes, it would mean higher tax rates, but it also would mean slashing government spending from 24 percent of GDP down to 18 percent of GDP. It would mean no sleazy TARP bailout, no Sarbanes-Oxley red tape, no expansion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and no added power and authority for the federal government.
This is the argument that I made in this interview on CNBC, though my opponent tried to do his version of the Brezhnev Doctrine (what&amp;#8217;s mine is mine, what&amp;#8217;s yours is negotiable), so I concluded th...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4036631</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:24:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4036631</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Here’s How to Balance the Budget</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4031220&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FcnNZY-c7_eA%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellOur fiscal policy goal should be smaller government, but here&amp;#8217;s a video for folks who think that balancing the budget should be the main objective.

The main message is that restraining the growth of government is the right way to get rid of red ink, so there is no conflict between advocates of limited government and serious supporters of fiscal balance.
More specifically, the video shows that it is possible to quickly balance the budget while also making all the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts permanent and protecting taxpayers from the alternative minimum tax. All these good things can happen if politicians simply limit annual spending growth to 2 percent each year. And they&amp;#8217;ll happen even faster if spending grows at an even slower rate.
This debunks the statist a...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4031220</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:29:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4031220</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medicare Reimbursement: A 23 Percent Cut Soon To Come?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4027159&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fmedicare-reimbursement-a-23-percent-cut-soon-to-come%2F2010.10.03</link>
            <description> 
“It will never happen.”
“They know better than to do it.”
“They realize the disaster it would be if they let it pass.”
That’s what I hear. I hear that the upcoming SGR adjustment, the one that will cut Medicare reimbursement by 23 percent, won’t go through.
In case you missed it, the SGR is a formula coming from the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 that does automatic cuts to Medicare reimbursement. This year we witnessed a legislative game of chicken in congress, with both sides agreeing that it was a bad idea to screw physicians in a time that they are trying to fix healthcare. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Musings of a Distractible Mind* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4027159</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:00:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4027159</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bending the Cost Curve: Ryan’s Roadmap Would Succeed Where ObamaCare Fails</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4013143&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fb7UUEW1Qu7s%2F</link>
            <description>By Michael F. CannonFrom my oped in today&amp;#8217;s Investors Business Daily:
Rep. Paul Ryan&amp;#8217;s (R-Wis.) &amp;#8220;Roadmap for America&amp;#8217;s Future&amp;#8221; proposes even tighter limits on Medicare&amp;#8217;s growth, leading columnist Bruce Bartlett to opine, &amp;#8220;the Medicare actuaries have shown the absurdity of the Ryan plan by denying that Medicare cuts already enacted into law are even worthy of projecting into the future.&amp;#8221;
On the contrary, experience and public choice theory suggest that the Ryan plan has a better shot at reducing future Medicare outlays than past efforts, because the Roadmap would change the lobbying game that fuels Medicare&amp;#8217;s growth.
For more on Ryan&amp;#8217;s Roadmap, click here.  For more on Medicare, read David Hyman&amp;#8217;s Medicare Meets Mephistophel...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4013143</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:52:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4013143</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>It’s Simple to Balance the Budget without Higher Taxes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3993877&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FEXtRwURzsag%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellJohn Podesta of the Center for American Progress had a column in Politico yesterday asserting that &amp;#8220;closing the budget gap entirely on the spending side would require draconian programmatic cuts.&amp;#8221; He went on to complain that there are some people who &amp;#8220;refuse to look at the revenue side of the ledger – while insisting that we dig the hole $830 billion deeper over the next decade by extending the Bush tax cuts.&amp;#8221;
 
Not surprisingly, Mr. Podesta is totally wrong. It&amp;#8217;s actually not that challenging to balance the budget. And it doesn&amp;#8217;t even require any spending cuts, though it would be a very good idea to dramatically downsize the federal government. Here&amp;#8217;s a chart showing this year&amp;#8217;s spending and revenue totals. It then sh...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3993877</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:02:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3993877</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Antioxidants, Nutritional Supplements &amp; Facial Wrinkles</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3780580&amp;cid=t_101784_160_f&amp;fid=36189&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skinmdblog.com%2F231%2Fantioxidants-nutritional-supplements-facial-wrinkles%2F</link>
            <description>Some fine lines on the face may be unavoidable if we live long enough.   But, the visible  signs of age  can be minimized in the same way that aging inside of the body can be kept to a minimum.   Good nutrition is the key.
You do not  need  large amounts of vitamins.  You just need  a balanced diet and good anti aging natural supplements to help you along.   It’s  very difficult , if not impossible, to get  every nutrient  that you  require  every day from the foods that you eat.  Studies (conducted in the US and Canada) have proven  that vegetables contain  less  nutrients than they had in the past,  due mainly  to soil depletion.
Some of the most helpful  antioxidants cannot be  found in common every day foods.  For example, curcumin is one of the most potent  antioxidants and na...</description>
            <author>Skin MD</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3780580</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 03:31:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3780580</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What is Brain Fitness? How to Enhance Brain Fitness?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3699606&amp;cid=t_101784_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F9kuPOAPPJdk%2F</link>
            <description>We define Brain Fitness as having the brain-based cognitive, emotional and self-regulation capacities required to succeed in one’s environment. Not everyone is exposed to the same mental demands nor do we all have the same starting points. This means we need to stop looking for ‘magic pills’ and invest more resources in developing toolkits and infrastructure similar to what the physical fitness industry has done over the last 30-40 years.
The following question guides much of our work at SharpBrains: “What tools provide the right kind of experience to refine our brains from a structural and functional point of view to harness neuroplasticity into real-world benefits?” We try to provide good information and answers by constantly monitoring and analyzing the state of science and th...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3699606</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:31:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3699606</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Wear “Goodnighties,” Get Better Sleep?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3679756&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fwear-goodnighties-get-better-sleep%2F2010.06.20</link>
            <description>We present for your consideration &amp;#8220;Goodnighties&amp;#8221; made from patented Ionx fabric.
THE CLAIM (from goodnighties.com):
All About Ionx®
Some have called it a &amp;#8216;miracle,&amp;#8217; but the benefits of Goodnighties® is really the result of nature meeting science in a process called ionization. Ionization under the patented brand name ‘Ionx’ is the process that saturates the fabric with negative ions –- more than 20 times found in nature.
Wearing Goodnighties with Ionx close to the body has been proven to increase blood flow thus reducing inflammation, improving muscle function, speeding recovery and reducing muscle aches and pains.
For years ionized fabric has been used by the medical community, professional athletes, Olympic teams, the military and astronauts because of th...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3679756</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3679756</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An Eater’s Guide To Food</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3592212&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fan-eaters-guide-to-food%2F2010.05.23</link>
            <description>Michael Pollan has become one of our most important writers about human nutrition. His book, The Omnivore&amp;#8217;s Dilemma (2006), spelled out why the almost eight billion humans on this planet had better balance what we eat &amp;#8211; for our own health and the health of the planet.
He published a small book in 2009 (Penguin Books) called Food Rules: An Eater&amp;#8217;s Manual. His rules are around seven words in three brief statements: &amp;#8220;Eat Food, Not Too Much, Mostly Plants.&amp;#8221; How simple and wise is that?
These three statements make up the three parts of this small book, with lots of practical &amp;#8220;rules.&amp;#8221; (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at eDocAmerica* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3592212</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 14:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3592212</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Utah Legislators Call for Fiscal Federalism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3298292&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fc8d7z699Udg%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenTea partiers take note: at the forefront of any effort to reduce the size of the federal government should be the devolvement of federal programs to the states. Achieving this may seem like mission impossible given the states&amp;#8217; addiction to federal money. However, there are signs that the idea of returning the relationship between the federal government and the states to that which the Founders prescribed is starting to gain some currency.
On Friday, the president of the Utah Senate and the speaker of the Utah House of Representatives penned an op-ed in the Washington Post calling for the federal government to begin the devolution process. The authors want the states to have the right to opt out of federal programs and allow the states to keep the taxes their residents s...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3298292</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:52:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3298292</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Problem Is Spending, not Deficits</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3092679&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fb0H6c8OTIyM%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellReckless spending increases under both Bush and Obama have resulted in unprecedented deficits. Congress will soon be forced to increase the nation&amp;#8217;s debt limit by an astounding $1.8 trillion. Government borrowing has become such a big issue that some politicians are proposing a deficit reduction commission, which may mean they are like alcoholics trying for a self-imposed intervention.
But all this fretting about deficits and debt is misplaced. Government borrowing is a bad thing, of course, but this video explains that the real problem is excessive government spending.
 
Fixating on the deficit allows politicians to pull a bait and switch, since they can raise taxes, claim they are solving the problem, when all they are doing is replacing debt-financed spending...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3092679</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:35:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3092679</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What’s Your Personality Like?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2807660&amp;cid=t_101784_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F09%2F17%2Fwhats-your-personality-like%2F</link>
            <description>An important part of improving one&amp;#8217;s life, searching for happiness, and even helping us with mental health issues or our relationships in life is self-discovery. The more you know about yourself &amp;#8212; your preferences, your way of thinking, your way of looking at the world &amp;#8212; the more you can actually go ahead and make changes in your life. If you&amp;#8217;re a big question mark to yourself, it&amp;#8217;s lot more difficult to start to improve those areas of your life that you&amp;#8217;d like to improve upon.
For years now, Psych Central and other websites have offered online personality quizzes and tests that help give you some insight into your personality. And while these work well for what they can say about you, they don&amp;#8217;t always give you as much information as you might lik...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2807660</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:32:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2807660</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Are contemporary diet plans compatible with Chinese medical theory?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192790&amp;cid=t_101784_127_f&amp;fid=38263&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fdeepesthealth%2FBMCc%2F%7E3%2FDUQj2Ic9Q5U%2F</link>
            <description>No.
But, let&amp;#8217;s discuss this further.  I&amp;#8217;ll be brief.  Consider, say, Medifast. It&amp;#8217;s popular among teenage girls and, apparently, some Chinese medicine students.  Perusing the website, it seems like a perfectly reasonable diet plan.  Things seem balanced, on the whole.  Great, great.
Let me ask you a question - is there something wrong with a basic whole foods diet consisting of whole grains, legumes and/or lean organic animal products, vegetables and fruits?  Maybe some exercise?  In the form of gentle Qigong, Taiji, walks outside, hiking, playing team sports and the like?  Are contemporary people so different from ancient people that we can&amp;#8217;t engage in the same activities that they did and manage to stay fit?
No.  No, no, no, no, NO.
Medifast, like many of...</description>
            <author>Deepest Health: Exploring Classical Chinese Medicine</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192790</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:39:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192790</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brain Fitness at New York Public Library</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2022186&amp;cid=t_101784_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F476789893%2F</link>
            <description>A few weeks ago I had the pleasure to give a talk to one hundred or so staff members at New York Public Library. As you would expect, it was a very stimulating group, and one of the participants, Brigid Cahalan, just wrote a fun blog post on her impressions from the event:
Brain Fitness at New York Public Library:
- &amp;quot;After attending a recent staff training session offered by the library's Office of Staff Development, I decided to return to a habit of my childhood--eating sardines.&amp;quot;
- key pillars for brain health ...are... &amp;quot;1) A balanced diet; 2) Cardiovascular physical exercise; 3) Stress management; and 4) Brain exercise: Novelty, Variety, Challenge (as long as it doesn't stress us out).&amp;quot;
Read full article: here.
Comment: A very interesting trend of observe - the growi...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2022186</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:30:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2022186</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Goes After More Unapproved Meds</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1826212&amp;cid=t_101784_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F400911377%2F</link>
            <description>The agency is telling companies that marketing unapproved ophthalmic balanced salt solutions (BSS) and unapproved topical drugs containing papain to stop manufacturing and marketing - or they risk enforcement action, such as seizure or an injunction - due to reports of serious adverse events. The manufacturing deadline is November 24 and the shipping deadline is January 21. 
&amp;#8220;These unapproved products have put consumers health in jeopardy, from reports of permanent vision loss with unapproved balanced salt solutions to a serious drop in blood pressure and increased heart rate from the topical papain products,” Janet Woodcock, who heads the FDA&amp;#8217;s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, says in a statement.

Ophthalmic balanced salt solutions are used to irrigate the eye durin...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1826212</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:54:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1826212</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Journal of Management &amp; Marketing in Healthcare 1(4)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1622038&amp;cid=t_101784_86_f&amp;fid=36669&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffadelibrary.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F07%2F15%2Fjournal-of-management-marketing-in-healthcare-14%2F</link>
            <description>This study examines how technological innovation is encouraged, and discouraged, in Canada and other selected Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, including the UK, France and the USA. The research uses The Conference Board of Canada&amp;#8217;s Innovation Framework as an analytical tool in benchmarking the performance of Canada and other OECD countries in several areas of health innovation, including the innovation environment, and the creation, diffusion, transformation and use of knowledge. The results of this study are discouraging for Canada as it scores poorly in many important areas of technological health innovation. Substantial efforts are needed, and needed now, to revitalise health innovation systems and to refuel the capacity to commercialise heal...</description>
            <author>Fade Library</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1622038</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:27:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1622038</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Know your onions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1301858&amp;cid=t_101784_133_f&amp;fid=35129&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwhitterer-autism.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F03%2Fknow-your-onions.html</link>
            <description>The campaign to increase food intake and variety is wearing me out. I foolishly decided that if we never eat the same thing twice, then everything will always be new, then there will be no safe harbour. It is now a given that every mealtime results in collective squalks of horror.He takes one glance at his dinner plate, clutches his throat and makes retching noises. I nudge the plate towards him, Asparagus spears, caramelized onions with crumbled bacon and a side of Dauphinoise potatoes. This child has to eat some, that child has to eat more and the other child just has to tolerate the food being on the table.“I am hate!”“You’ve never had it before so you don’t know if you hate it yet.”“I hate celery!”“It’s not celery dear.”“What it is den?”“Asparagus.”“I ha...</description>
            <author>Whitterer on Autism</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1301858</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:44:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1301858</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>It is Not Only Cars That Deserve Good Maintenance: Brain Care 101</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1147157&amp;cid=t_101784_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F215632839%2F</link>
            <description>Last week, the US Car Care Council released a list of tips on how to take care of your car and “save big money at the pump in 2008.”
You may not have paid much attention to this announcement. Yes, it’s important to save gas these days; but, it’s not big news that good maintenance habits will improve the performance of a car, and extend its life.
If we can all agree on the importance of maintaining our cars that get us around town, what about maintaining our brains sitting behind the wheel?
A spate of recent news coverage on brain fitness and “brain training” has missed an important constituency: younger people. Recent advancements in brain science have as tremendous implications for teenagers and adults of all ages as they do for seniors.
In a recent conversation with neuroscie...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1147157</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:27:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1147157</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Balancing Brains For Profit's Sake</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=815342&amp;cid=t_101784_109_f&amp;fid=35677&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FBrainBasedBusiness%2F%7E3%2F146745482%2Fa_brain_for_balance_and_profit.html</link>
            <description>If you agree that unbalanced doctor&amp;ndash;nurse relationships cut out weath from both sides &amp;hellip; or that CEO&amp;ndash;employee rapport problems stall profits for most firms &amp;hellip; you&amp;rsquo;ll also agree there are likely better ways to relate at work. How so? For instance, toss in a few current brain keys about how talents grow and develop or how diverse people draw higher productivity from multiple intelligences, and you&amp;rsquo;ll also open radical challenges to deep seated conventional wisdom.Cultures can become a firm&amp;#39;s best currency,&amp;nbsp;and that transformation happens easier than you may think.Simply rewire&amp;nbsp;your firm&amp;#39;s mental&amp;nbsp;plasticity for better balances between people and profit. Rather than rely on one boss ... ask instead&amp;nbsp;...Do rigid hierarchies stifle i...</description>
            <author>BrainBasedBusiness</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=815342</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:04:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">815342</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Does this look swollen?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=719399&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=34867&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thediabetesblog.com%2F2007%2F07%2F07%2Fdoes-this-look-swollen%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: Type 2, Adult Onset, Diet, Lifestyle, Exercise, SupportWhat is the purpose of body fat? We all have it, some of us a little more than others. As we grow older, some of our diets fall out of balance with our energy needs causing our white fat cells to become swollen. 
White fat cells secrete leptin, adiponectin and resistin. Leptin and adiponectin work together in suppressing appetite. Resistin is the newest discovered - and has been found to participate in the inflammatory response and resistence to insulin. It also triggers an immune response to irritation, so it may be the fat cells attempt to shut your piehole because we're not gonna take it. As the white fat cells take on excessive calories they begin swelling, resulting in an inflammatory response. 
Inflammation, by defin...</description>
            <author>The Diabetes Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=719399</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">719399</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>O'Rielly &quot;less nuanced&quot; than Father Charles Couglin</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=587990&amp;cid=t_101784_133_f&amp;fid=35452&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.graphictruth.com%2F2007%2F05%2Forielly-less-nuanced-than-father.html</link>
            <description>In this study, O'Reilly is a heavier and less-nuanced user of the propaganda devices than Coughlin.&quot;tag: Hate Speech, Hate Radio, conservative radio, Authoritarianism, integrety. Bill O'Rielly, Fair and BalancedYou can syndicate this site using our atom feed. (Source: Graphictruth)</description>
            <author>Graphictruth</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=587990</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">587990</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Depression in breast cancer moms affects kids</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=478733&amp;cid=t_101784_87_f&amp;fid=34865&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecancerblog.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fdepression-in-breast-cancer-moms-affects-kids%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: Breast Cancer, Research, Daily news, Cancer SurvivorsCancer sent me into a state of depression. And it took more than a year of counseling and treatment with an anti-depressant to bring me back to a balanced and healthy level of functioning.My type of depression -- the kind that shows up just after a cancer diagnosis -- is not uncommon. And neither is the spillover that depression can leave on the children of moms depressed because of their disease.A study at the University of Pittsburgh -- the first to examine the relationship between children's concerns and a mother's cancer-related depression -- found children of depressed breast cancer patients were more likely to be concerned or anxious about their mother's cancer and about how the disease affects their families.It's not ...</description>
            <author>The Cancer Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=478733</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">478733</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

