<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: bill o'reilly</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'bill o'reilly'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22bill+o%27reilly%22&t=%22bill+o%27reilly%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:13:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Bill O'Reilly gets it EXACTLY right!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5069720&amp;cid=t_312953_133_f&amp;fid=35452&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.graphictruth.com%2F2011%2F07%2Fbill-orielly-gets-it-exactly-right.html</link>
            <description>&quot;No one believing in Jesus commits mass murder,&quot; he said. &quot;The man might have called himself a Christian on the net, but he is certainly not of that faith...we can find no evidence, none, that this killer practiced Christianity in any way.&quot;It's odd to find that I agree with Bill-O. I do. I've said a great deal about this over the years.&amp;nbsp;I was actually a little shocked to see how VERY much I'd said about it.But I don't think Bill-O would really like to persue that thought. Because it amounts to this: Calling yourself a Christian doesn't make you a Christian.Anders Behring Breivik is a Christian in exactly the same sense that Michelle Bachmann is. Or Ted Haggard. Or George Bush. Or Tom Ball.&amp;nbsp;Jesus made this point a few times. &quot;Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord,..&amp;nbsp;&quot; ...</description>
            <author>Graphictruth</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5069720</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5069720</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is Radiation Good For You? Ann Coulter Got It Wrong</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4636440&amp;cid=t_312953_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fis-radiation-good-for-you-ann-coulter-got-it-wrong%2F2011.03.25</link>
            <description>Sometimes when a pundit or politician makes claims that are either contrary to or distort science for ideological or political advantage, I feel the need to discuss those claims, sometimes even sarcastically. Such was the case last week, when Ann Coulter wrote a blisteringly ignorant column, entitled A Glowing Report on Radiation. She wrote this article in the wake of the fears arising in Japan and around the world of nuclear catastrophe due to the damage to the Fukushima nuclear power plant caused by the earthquake and tsunami that hit northern Japan on March 11. Coulter was subsequently interviewed by Fox News pundit Bill O’Reilly on The O’Reilly Factor on Thursday evening:
Yes, according to Coulter, radiation is good for you, just like toxic sludge! Even more amazing, in this video ...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4636440</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:00:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4636440</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>5 Reasons Jennifer Aniston Is Bad for Society, From Lemondrop's Nick Hadel</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3899346&amp;cid=t_312953_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Ffeel%2F5-reasons-jennifer-aniston-is-bad-for-society-from-lemondrops-nick-hadel%2F</link>
            <description>photo: Getty Images
A certain gentleman and I have a habit of arguing over actresses that we do and don&amp;#8217;t like: I don&amp;#8217;t mind Julia Roberts, but he thinks she&amp;#8217;s a horrid actress. I&amp;#8217;m no fan of Brooklyn Decker (she looks like a pug!), he thinks she&amp;#8217;s not so bad (uh-huh). The other night, we broached the topic of Jennifer Aniston: He hates her for a number of reasons, but his favorite way to sum it all up is by referring to her as &amp;#8220;beige.&amp;#8221; (I think he got this trick from his favorite film critic.) I feigned some resistance to his logic, but by and large, I think he might be right. So this one&amp;#8217;s for him.
Nick Hadel&amp;#8217;s 5 Reasons Jennifer Aniston Is Harmful to Society (That Don&amp;#8217;t Have to Do With Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly):

5. She Plays Jennif...</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3899346</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:42:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3899346</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Jennifer Aniston Is Empowering Women, Destroying America</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3861986&amp;cid=t_312953_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fjennifer-aniston-is-empowering-women-destroying-america%2F</link>
            <description>This is the face that is ruining America. photo: WENN.com
Jennifer Aniston&amp;#8217;s been busy promoting her new movie, The Switch, about a single woman using a sperm donor to have a child. Aniston said, &amp;#8220;Women are realizing more and more that you don&amp;#8217;t have to settle. They don&amp;#8217;t have to fiddle with a man to have that child.&amp;#8221; Yes, that&amp;#8217;s right — Aniston said that women don&amp;#8217;t need men to have a baby. How. Dare. She.



Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly said on Tuesday that Aniston&amp;#8217;s comments were &amp;#8220;destructive to our society.&amp;#8221; If women realize they don&amp;#8217;t need men to have a baby, what else will they think they can do on their own? Drive a car? Run a business? We&amp;#8217;re so lucky that Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly is brave enough to tell the truth, no matte...</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3861986</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:28:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3861986</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>O’Reilly: No Freedom, No How</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3350257&amp;cid=t_312953_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FpgCUg7q37QI%2F</link>
            <description>By David BoazBill O&amp;#8217;Reilly teases an interview with John Stossel this way:
Should Americans be able to use their body for any purpose? John Stossel says yes and joins us to explain!
And Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly says no! No to legal prostitution, no to polygamy, no even to legal markets for vitally needed organs. Check it out:
Watch the latest news video at video.foxnews.com
More Stossel videos on personal freedom here. Cato research on organ markets here. And don&amp;#8217;t forget to watch John Stossel every Thursday night at 8 on the Fox Business Network. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3350257</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:45:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3350257</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Foxy Lady Sarah Palin Weighs In</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3178959&amp;cid=t_312953_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2010%2F01%2F15%2Ffoxy-lady-sarah-palin-weighs-in%2F</link>
            <description>New cartoon by Trussell &amp; Trussell on AOL’s Politics Daily. Foxy Lady Sarah Palin Weighs In.
Posted in Music - TV - Film, Politics Daily Tagged: bill o'reilly, chaos theory, fox tv, political cartoon, sarah palin (Source: Donna Trussell)</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3178959</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:13:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3178959</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sarah Palin - Objectification - Reaction - Situation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2272011&amp;cid=t_312953_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F03%2F16%2Fsarah-palin-objectification-reaction-situation%2F</link>
            <description>Eric Deggans, has a nice article in the Saint Petersburg Times summarizing research by psychologists from Univesity of South Florida, Jamie L. Goldenberg and Nathan A. Heflick.  Their research examined the objectifying effects of thinking about Sarah Palin&amp;#8217;s appearance.  Immediately below, you will find excerpts from Deggans&amp;#8217;s article.  Below that, you&amp;#8217;ll find some reflections from Jamie Goldenberg regarding the negative reaction of some conservative media to her research.
* * *
Two researchers at the University of South Florida have developed a study that suggests . . . that a random group of Republicans and independents asked to focus on Palin&amp;#8217;s attractiveness felt less likely to vote for the GOP ticket in last November&amp;#8217;s elections.
&amp;#8220;The idea is tha...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2272011</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:01:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2272011</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Irishman VS Barney</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1851078&amp;cid=t_312953_140_f&amp;fid=35448&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fseemedlikeagoodideathetime.com%2F2008%2F10%2F03%2Fthe-irishman-vs-barney%2F</link>
            <description>For D&amp;#8230;..The Irishman takes on The Toe Tapping Bathroom Stall Dwelling Barney Frank
 
 

&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; (Source: bipolar chicks blogging)</description>
            <author>bipolar chicks blogging</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1851078</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:30:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1851078</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why is General Electric Still Doing Business with Iran?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1454293&amp;cid=t_312953_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fflapsblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D6998</link>
            <description>Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly :G.E. continue to do business with Iran
Howard Kurtz chronicles the blood feud between Fox News&amp;#8217; Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly and MSNBC&amp;#8217;s Keith Olbermann and their superiors. But, he doesn&amp;#8217;t answer the question:
Why is General Electric, the owner of NBC News, continuing to do business with the terrorist state of Iran?
Well, Flap is waiting for an answer.
Update:
The White House has a bone to pick with NBC News as well in an unprecedented criticism. (Source: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog)</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1454293</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 21:07:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1454293</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bill O’Tantrum: Anger Management, Exhibit One</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1449407&amp;cid=t_312953_135_f&amp;fid=35247&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fmyjourneywithaids.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F05%2F15%2Fbill-o-before-anger-management%2F</link>
            <description>Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly of FAUX News has been the brunt of more-than-the-usual giggling on MSNBC&amp;#8217;s Countdown with Keith Olbermann this week.
An old tape from &amp;#8220;Orally&amp;#8221;&amp;#8217;s days at ABC&amp;#8217;s Inside Edition shows how endearing he has been to co-workers since his youth! (As has been the case throughout the blogosphere, this tape may be removed without [...] (Source: My journey with AIDS)</description>
            <author>My journey with AIDS</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1449407</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:44:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1449407</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hillary Clinton Watch: The O’Reilly Factor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1411737&amp;cid=t_312953_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fflapsblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D6890</link>
            <description>Link: sevenload.com

Senator Hillary Clinton with Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly on the Fox News tonight
Hillary was sociable, respectul and did NOT CACKLE on Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly&amp;#8217;s show tonight. This was Hillary&amp;#8217;s first appearance on Fox News.
The left will be less kind. And, they are now saying Hillary is a tool of the RIGHT - the best surrogate for the GOP.


 
    

Look at the comments:
Who Needs a Republican When You Have HRC





To do all of their dirty work.




**********She has become&amp;#8230;





a filthy Quisling. 
Race-baiting+War-mongering+habitually lying+Quisling&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;-Hillary Clinton




**********I believe if HRC can not win then she does not want another one to win either





I do believe she is looking forward to 2012 as well.Otherwise look...</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1411737</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:31:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1411737</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hell Freezes Over Watch: Hillary Clinton to Appear on Fox News</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1406902&amp;cid=t_312953_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fflapsblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D6873</link>
            <description>Drudge has it, of course.
First, Obama with Chris Wallace and now Hillary with O&amp;#8217;Reilly.
The LEFT is already pissed at Obama. But, Hillary needs to drive up her poll numbers among working class white voters nationally.
Flap wonders if O&amp;#8217;Reilly will play Jeremiah Wright clips? (Source: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog)</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1406902</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:00:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1406902</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hillary Clinton Watch: Media Matters and Hillary</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=921639&amp;cid=t_312953_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fflapsblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D5672</link>
            <description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbzC6-N9mwM

Hillary Clinton helped start Media Matters.
Shocker of the Day.
Now, is that why they are going after Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh?
To discredit them prior to the upcoming Hillary campaign for President, you say?
Fancy that&amp;#8230;&amp;#8230;.
Previous:
Michael Ramirez on Flip Flopping Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton Watch: Norman Hsu Wants Plea Deal Withdrawn
Hillary Clinton Watch: Hsu Contributions Help Hillary Supporters
 Michael Ramirez on Hillary Clinton and Norman Hsu
Hillary Clinton Watch: Will Return $850,000 in Norman Hsu Contributions? Maybe
Hillary Clinton Watch: Will Return $850,000 in Hsu Contributions?


Technorati Tags: Hillary Clinton, Media Matters, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly 

 




 






Facebook Flap! (Source: Fu...</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=921639</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:43:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">921639</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>To Those Who Have Jumped The Shark</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=579427&amp;cid=t_312953_133_f&amp;fid=35452&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.graphictruth.com%2F2007%2F04%2Ffunnysignjpg-jpeg-image-600x399-pixels.html</link>
            <description>Have you noticed how much conservative repositioning sounds like whining? Here's Bill O'Rielly, with a Hail-Mary attempt to save his credibility, with this grouchy (and unfactual) contradiction of his guest, Marvin Kalb.From the April 24 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:  KALB: What was true was that, when the war was being set up, and in the first year or even two after the war got started, Fox and many other people associated with Fox or the Fox point of view -- let's put it that way -- said all kinds of things in support of the war, which were not being borne out by the facts that the two of us --  O'REILLY: No, I didn't. I went on facts and facts alone.Cue Laugh Track, as once again, Media Matters pounces upon his facticious disorder and mocks him publicly. He really, really RE...</description>
            <author>Graphictruth</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=579427</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">579427</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

