<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: biotechnolgy</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'biotechnolgy'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22biotechnolgy%22&t=%22biotechnolgy%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:59:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Connecticut Bill To Limit Gifts To Docs Dies Quietly</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3542875&amp;cid=t_157317_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FaEC8QXIOt_M%2F</link>
            <description>A bill that would have gone into effect in Connecticut on July 1 to strictly limit gifts that drug and device makers could provide physicians and restrict the use of prescriber data died last night (this is the text). The bill hardly had bipartisan support as Democrats backed passage, while Republicans opposed (see here). For the legislation, which has been around while, to become law, the state assembly&amp;#8217;s Public Health Committee must reintroduce the legislation during the next session beginning in January.
Instead, in a last-minute maneuver, another bill did pass that simply requires adherence to existing codes adopted by PhRMA and AdvaMed. &amp;#8220;This gets most people where they wanted to be,&amp;#8221; says state senator Jonathan Harris, who chairs the Public Health Committee. &amp;#8220;...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3542875</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:59:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3542875</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Biotech Advance Could Protect Patients in Drug Trials</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1379319&amp;cid=t_157317_87_f&amp;fid=34825&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wesleyjsmith.com%2Fblog%2F2008%2F04%2Fbiotech-advance-could-protect-patients.html</link>
            <description>I probably don't say this often enough, but most biotechnological research is entirely ethical and exciting. Case in point: The FDA is poised to approve a test that picks up &quot;biomarkers&quot; that could tell researchers whether a drug is harming a patient's kidneys during human trials and, I suppose, afterwards. From the story: Currently, experimental drugs are tested in animals before being taken to human clinical trails. But animals' reactions aren't always the best predictor of whether substances will be safe for humans. Drugs harmless to animals can hurt humans, and vice versa. If a drug toxic to the kidneys passes animal tests today, the damage might not show up until it is too late. &quot;Using current tests, you have lost about 70 percent of the kidney function before you pick it up,&quot; says Wi...</description>
            <author>Secondhand Smoke</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1379319</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:28:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1379319</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Creation of New Life Forms: the next step for DNA?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1098832&amp;cid=t_157317_87_f&amp;fid=35052&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwomensbioethics.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F12%2Fcreation-of-new-life-forms-next-step.html</link>
            <description>(Source: Women's Bioethics Blog)</description>
            <author>Women's Bioethics Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1098832</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:47:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1098832</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Great Non-fiction Read: Liberation Biology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1037802&amp;cid=t_157317_87_f&amp;fid=35052&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwomensbioethics.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F11%2Fholiday-reading-suggestion-liberation.html</link>
            <description>(Source: Women's Bioethics Blog)</description>
            <author>Women's Bioethics Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1037802</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:28:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1037802</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

