<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: bourne</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'bourne'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22bourne%22&t=%22bourne%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:58:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: June 14, 2011</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4934336&amp;cid=t_452912_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F06%2F14%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-june-14-2011%2F</link>
            <description>I have a &amp;#8220;friend&amp;#8221; who spent their entire 2010 stuck in what-ifs. What if I lose my job? What if I never feel better? What if my dreams don&amp;#8217;t come true?
Do you have a friend like that?
Do you have a friend who attacks your self-esteem by laughing at your mistakes, criticizes your weaknesses and points a finger at your flaws. Worse yet, does she ever say, &amp;#8220;You won&amp;#8217;t ever be successful in life&amp;#8221; because all your efforts are &amp;#8220;just not good enough.&amp;#8221;
Some kind of friend right?
But what if I told you that friend was not a friend at all, but your thoughts. Closer to you than any friend would ever be, this inner self-critic sits on your shoulders and constantly berates you. That type of constant negative feedback will wear on a person&amp;#8217;s soul and ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4934336</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:17:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4934336</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>33 Favorite Self-Help Books of Psychologists</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4670173&amp;cid=t_452912_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F04%2F01%2F33-favorite-self-help-books-of-psychologists%2F</link>
            <description>Since the response was good from my post on 15 quotes that motivate and inspire that I pulled from LinkedIn group, The Psychology Network, I joined a few weeks ago, I thought I&amp;#8217;d publish their recommendation for good self-help books, too. 
Since most of them are mental health professionals (unlike me, who just pretends she is), their list lends credibility and might be a good one to review every now and then either for yourself or in your work with patients.
1. Freedom From the Ties That Bind: The Secret of Self Liberation by Guy Finley  
2. I Ain&amp;#8217;t Much Baby, But I&amp;#8217;m All I&amp;#8217;ve Got by Jess Lair, Ph.D.
3. The Anxiety &amp; Phobia Workbook, Fourth Edition  by Edmund J. Bourne   
4. Women with Attention Deficit Disorder: Embrace Your Differences and Transform Yo...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4670173</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:34:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4670173</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: August 10, 2010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3854570&amp;cid=t_452912_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F08%2F10%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-august-10-2010%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;m an avid reader who&amp;#8217;s been alternating between five to ten very different books lately. Why so many? Well it&amp;#8217;s still summer and I&amp;#8217;m soaking every bit of it while I can. One that&amp;#8217;s been taking much of my attention is The Anxiety &amp; Phobia Workbook by Edmund J. Bourne, Ph.D. While the title isn&amp;#8217;t very sexy, the read is very illuminating.
Why?
It talks about the comprehensive (what I&amp;#8217;ll call) diet plan for someone suffering from anxiety and phobia. One of the topics it covers is negative self-talk. The kind that often exacerbates anxiety and is also described as one of five mind traps in this week&amp;#8217;s top post. It also talks about the importance of exercise, meditation and even nutrition. All things that can help ease your anxiety so that yo...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3854570</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:26:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3854570</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>War Is the Health of the State, Redux</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2477548&amp;cid=t_452912_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FmDmTDwITUH8%2F</link>
            <description>Randolph Bourne warned us nearly a century ago that &amp;#8220;war is the health of the state.&amp;#8221;  There may be no better present evidence of the danger of promiscuous war-making comes than a new article by columnist Ralph Peters.  Faced with the inevitable horror of war, he says embrace the horror rather than forgo the war.
Argues Peters:
While the essence of warfare never changes—it will always be about killing the enemy until he acquiesces in our desires or is exterminated—its topical manifestations evolve and its dimensions expand. Today, the United States and its allies will never face a lone enemy on the battlefield. There will always be a hostile third party in the fight, but one which we not only refrain from attacking but are hesitant to annoy: the media.
While this brief ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2477548</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:34:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2477548</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Using Computer Simulation To ID Side Effects</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1082980&amp;cid=t_452912_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F198038164%2F</link>
            <description>That&amp;#8217;s what researchers at the University of California, San Diego, are doing. They believe they found a method that, although not foolproof, may be an easy way to identify some of the side effects currently missed during the clinical trial process, The New Scientist reports (subscription required).
Philip Bourne and his colleagues at the University of California, San Diego, used a process similar to what drugmakers now do when running simulations to test compounds. As a proof of concept, they studied selective oestrogen receptor modulators, a class of drug that includes Tamoxifen. To look for possible side effects of such drugs, the mag writes, they searched around 800 human proteins for sites that the drug might bind to and scored one direct hit - a protein that helps control the m...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1082980</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:25:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1082980</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Webolution Will Be Televised</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=962566&amp;cid=t_452912_132_f&amp;fid=35001&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nodalpoint.org%2F2007%2F10%2F19%2Fthe_webolution_will_be_televised</link>
            <description>The American Gill Scott-Heron once famously remarked that The Revolution Will Not Be Televised. Science has undergone its own quiet revolution since the invention of the Web back in 1990. This has slowly but surely changed scientific communication, a &quot;Webolution&quot; if you like. The recent addition of television to the Web means that, to paraphrase Gill, the Webolution will be televised. You can now watch some of the webolution in science, thanks the likes of JOVE (The Journal Of Visualised Experiments), SciVee.TV, Google Video and YouTube. What are these sites like and is their scientific and technical content any good?
read more (Source: nodalpoint.org - A bioinformatics weblog)</description>
            <author>nodalpoint.org - A bioinformatics weblog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=962566</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:19:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">962566</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

