<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: brigham and women's hospital</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'brigham and women's hospital'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22brigham+and+women%27s+hospital%22&t=%22brigham+and+women%27s+hospital%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:50:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Imaging That Can Reliably Distinguish Between Benign And Malignant Pancreatic Cysts</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5174615&amp;cid=t_356304_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fimaging-that-can-reliably-distinguish-between-benign-and-malignant-pancreatic-cysts%2F2011.08.29</link>
            <description>Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) has been demonstrated to be able to differentiate between benign and potentially malignant pancreatic cysts. Researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital, Physical Sciences, Inc., Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Brandeis University have published their findings in Biomedical Optics Express. In their study they used surgically removed pancreas specimens of patients with pancreatic cysts to assess them with OCT and compare the results with histology examinations. OCT was able to reveal specific morphological characteristics used to differentiate between the low-risk and high-risk cysts. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Medgadget* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5174615</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:00:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5174615</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Dietary Guidelines Give Little New Guidance</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4429019&amp;cid=t_356304_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fnew-dietary-guidelines-offer-little-new-guidance%2F2011.02.02</link>
            <description>There isn’t much new in the latest iteration of the &amp;#8220;Dietary Guidelines for Americans.&amp;#8221; Three years in the making, the 2010 guidelines (released a tad late, on January 31, 2011) offer the usual advice about eating less of the bad stuff (salt; saturated fat, trans fats, and cholesterol; and refined grains) and more of the good stuff (fruits and vegetables; whole grains; seafood, beans, and other lean protein; and unsaturated fats). I’ve listed the 23 main recommendations below. You can also find them on the &amp;#8220;Dietary Guidelines&amp;#8221; website.
The guidelines do break some new ground. They state loudly and clearly that overweight and obesity are a leading nutrition problem in the United States, and that a healthy diet can help people achieve a healthy weight. They also r...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4429019</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:00:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4429019</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Eat More Calcium To Prevent Calcium-Containing Kidney Stones?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4025620&amp;cid=t_356304_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Feat-more-calcium-to-prevent-calcium-containing-kidney-stones%2F2010.10.02</link>
            <description>Over the years I have had a number of patients with painful kidney stones and once they have passed (or been removed) I have felt at a loss to helping them prevent them. &amp;#8221;Stay hydrated&amp;#8221; somehow didn&amp;#8217;t seem adequate, although we know fluid intake can help stave off recurrent kidney stone attacks.
Some textbooks said &amp;#8220;avoid calcium&amp;#8221; since most stones are made of calcium oxylate. High oxylate levels can be found in some fruits and vegetables, as well as in nuts and chocolate. Yet there was no real scientific evidence that these foods caused stones. The evidence for who got kidney stones was all over the ballpark and for a physician, that means no prevention advice is really proven.
A new study published in the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Neph...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4025620</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4025620</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Young Doctors Who Lie</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3858156&amp;cid=t_356304_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fyoung-doctors-who-lie%2F2010.08.11</link>
            <description>This is something: A study published in the July 20, 2010 Annals of Internal Medicine finds that 5 percent of residency applications contain plagiarized content. The study from Boston’s Brigham &amp; Woman’s Hospital is based on the personal statements of nearly 5,000 residency applicants that were matched against a database of published content.
The authors comment that the study is limited, among other things, by the fact that it was done in just one institution. It makes me wonder if the number is artificially high or potentially too low.
So why would medical students lie? (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at 33 Charts* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3858156</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:00:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3858156</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>2010-2011 U.S. News &amp; World Report “Best Hospitals” List</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3758063&amp;cid=t_356304_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2F15%2F2010-2011-u-s-news-world-report-best-hospitals-list%2F</link>
            <description>This week, U.S. News &amp;#38; World Report issued its 2010-2011 rankings of the best U.S. hospitals for adults. The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is rated #1 in cancer treatment, and Johns Hopkins is rated #1 in gynecology and #1 overall based upon all medical specialties. If you would like more information regarding [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3758063</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:16:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3758063</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Problem With The Newly-Launched “Healthcare.gov”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3750060&amp;cid=t_356304_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fthe-problem-with-the-newly-launched-healthcaregov%2F2010.07.13</link>
            <description>If a website touted misleading healthcare information, you’d hope the government would do something about it. But what do you do when the government is the one feeding the public bad information?
Last week the Obama administration launched the new Healthcare.gov. It’s mostly an online insurance shopping website. It&amp;#8217;s very much a federal government version of sites like eHealthInsurance.com or Massachsetts’ HealthConnector site, which have been around for years.
So when HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, in announcing the new site, claims it gives consumers “unprecedented transparency” into the healthcare marketplace, you should wonder what she means. But that’s not the big problem with this site. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at See First B...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3750060</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:00:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3750060</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Acupuncture CME Offered By Harvard Medical School</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3737041&amp;cid=t_356304_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Facupuncture-cme-offered-by-harvard-medical-school%2F2010.07.08</link>
            <description>Some universities have more cachet than others. On the West Coast it&amp;#8217;s Stanford that has the reputation as the best. Then there&amp;#8217;s Oxford, Yale, and MIT. I would wager that in most people’s minds the creme de la creme is Harvard, where you find the best of the best. If Harvard is involved, a project gains an extra gobbet of credibility. Brigham and Women’s Hospital also has similar reputation in U.S. as one the hospitals associated with only Harvard and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) &amp;#8212; premier university, premier hospital, premier journal.
So if Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital are offering continuing medical education (CME) for acupuncture, there must be something to it, right? A course called “Structural Acupuncture for Physic...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3737041</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 01:00:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3737041</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How A Gynecologist Thinks About Lung Cancer</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3529787&amp;cid=t_356304_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fhow-a-gynecologist-thinks-about-lung-cancer%2F2010.05.04</link>
            <description>A new report on lung cancer in women has been published by the Women&amp;#8217;s Health Policy and Advocacy Program at Brigham and Women&amp;#8217;s Hospital.
Called &amp;#8220;Out of the Shadows,&amp;#8221; the report seeks to raise awareness about lung cancer, currently the leading cause of cancer death in women, and more importantly, to increase funding for research for its prevention, detection and treatment. (HT to Booster Shots, the LA Times&amp;#8216; fabulous health blog, for highlighting the report.)
I encourage you to read the report, which is well written and comprehensive. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at The Blog that Ate Manhattan* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3529787</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3529787</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Doc Quits Hospital Over Conflict Of Interest Policy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3205115&amp;cid=t_356304_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2Fkofw7pUnOBc%2F</link>
            <description>In an effort to limit industry influence, Partners HealthCare, which owns Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s Hospitals in Boston, recently imposed a new conflict of interest policy (background here and here). Now, one doc is quitting.
Lawrence DuBuske, 55, an allergy and asthma specialist and a Harvard Medical School instructor, will resign from Brigham and Women’s Hospital at month&amp;#8217;s end, The Boston Globe reports, which notes he was Glaxo&amp;#8217;s highest-paid speaker during a three-month period last year, making $99,375 for giving 40 talks to other docs last April, May, and June (see here).
He spoke in Boston, Buenos Aires, Poland, and Russia, six other drugmakers also use him as a speaker, and he is a consultant for a half-dozen more, the paper adds, although there w...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3205115</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:03:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3205115</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Boston Hospitals Limit Pharma Board Compensation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3139246&amp;cid=t_356304_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FLLh7x1LGSFU%2F</link>
            <description>The effort to limit industry influence on the medical community continues. Partners HealthCare, which owns Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s Hospitals in Boston, has imposed caps on the amount of money that its senior officials can receive for sitting on the boards of drugmakers and biotechs, The New York Times reports. The limits? No more than $5,000 a day for actual board work (some had been receiving more than $200,000 a year) and stock may no longer be accepted.
The move appears to go further than what other hospitals are instituting and is significant given the research hospitals are affiliated with Harvard Medical School. Although if more academic centers take this step, such efforts may rub up against the insistence by shareholder groups that board members hold stock s...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3139246</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:55:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3139246</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MAGP2 Gene Expression Signature: A Potential Ovarian Cancer Personalized Treatment Target</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3071433&amp;cid=t_356304_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F12%2F08%2Fmagp2-gene-expression-signature-a-potential-ovarian-cancer-personalized-treatment-target%2F</link>
            <description>A multi-institutional study has identified a potential personalized treatment target for the most common form of ovarian cancer. In the December 8 issue of Cancer Cell, the research team describes finding that a gene called MAGP2 – not previously associated with any type of cancer – was overexpressed in papillary serous ovarian tumors of patients [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3071433</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:17:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3071433</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>2009-2010 U.S. News &amp; World Report Best U.S. Hospital Rankings</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2611148&amp;cid=t_356304_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F07%2F16%2F2009-2010-u-s-news-world-report-best-u-s-hospital-rankings%2F</link>
            <description>Today, U.S. News &amp;#38; World Report issued its 2009-2010 rankings of the best U.S. hospitals for adults. The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is rated #1 in cancer treatment; Brigham and Women&amp;#8217;s Hospital is rated #1 in gynecology; and Johns Hopkins is rated #1 overall based upon all medical specialties.
If you would like [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2611148</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:14:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2611148</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patty Franchi Flaherty Loses Battle to Ovarian Cancer, But Deserves a Long Standing Ovation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1727797&amp;cid=t_356304_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F08%2F19%2Fpatty-franchi-flaherty-loses-battle-to-ovarian-cancer-but-deserves-a-long-standing-ovation%2F</link>
            <description>It is with deep regret that I must inform you that, Patty Franchi Flaherty, founder of the nonprofit organization Ovations for the Cure of Ovarian Cancer, peacefully succumbed to her nine-year battle with the disease on August 18, 2008, surrounded by friends and family. She was 53 years old. Patty was a legendary ovarian cancer [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1727797</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:34:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1727797</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

