<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: cancer act</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'cancer act'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22cancer+act%22&t=%22cancer+act%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:55:29 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Professor Geoffrey Petts of the University of Westminster says they “are not teaching pseudo-science”. The facts show this is not true</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5159029&amp;cid=t_227982_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D4683%26utm_source%3Drss%26utm_medium%3Drss%26utm_campaign%3Dprofessor-geoffrey-petts-of-the-university-of-westminster-says-they-are-not-teaching-pseudo-science-the-facts-show-this-is-not-true</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up
On 23rd May 2008 a letter was sent to the vice-chancellor of the University of Westminster, Professor Geoffrey Petts








Dear Professor Petts
    &amp;nbsp;
    You may be aware an article by Zoe Corbyn, published in Times Higher Education 24 April 2008, with the title Experts criticise &amp;#8216;pseudo-scientific&amp;#8217; complementary medicine degrees.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The subtitle of the article was Vice-chancellors should re-examine courses, say campaigners.&amp;nbsp; In the light of that, we wondered whether you had anything to add to the comments made by David Peters in todays THE.&amp;nbsp; We are preparing a response to that, and it seems fair to ask your view before we proceed.
    (In order to save you time, copies of the two articles are attached.)
    &amp;nbsp;
    As an expert on...</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5159029</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:37:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5159029</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A thoroughly dangerous charity: YesToLife promotes nonsense cancer treatments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5159038&amp;cid=t_227982_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D4239%26utm_source%3Drss%26utm_medium%3Drss%26utm_campaign%3Da-thoroughly-dangerous-charity-yestolife-promotes-nonsense-cancer-treatments</link>
            <description>Conclusion
The information supplied by YesToLife is more likely to kill you than to cure you.
The next time you see somebody collecting for a &amp;quot;cancer charity&amp;quot; be very careful before you give them money.

Follow-up (Source: DC's goodscience)</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5159038</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:42:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5159038</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What actually gets taught on a homeopathy course: part 1</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3149064&amp;cid=t_227982_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D2628</link>
            <description>The purpose of this post is to reveal a few samples of things that are taught on a homeopathy &amp;#8216;degree&amp;#8217; course. The course in question was the &amp;quot;BSc Hons homeopathy course at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN). Entry to this course was closed in 2008 and, after an internal review, UCLAN closed almost all of the rest of its courses in alternative medicine too. The university is to be commended for this . 
The purpose of making public some of what used to be taught is not to embarrass UCLAN, which has already done the sensible thing, but to make it clear that the sort of thing taught on such courses is both absurd and dangerous, in the hope of discouraging other courses





.Three years after I first asked for teaching materials, the Information Commisioner ruled th...</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3149064</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:56:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3149064</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why degrees in Chinese medicine are a danger to patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2688658&amp;cid=t_227982_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D2043</link>
            <description>Conclusion
This selection of slides shows that much of the stuff taught in degrees in herbal medicine poses a real danger to public safety and to public health. 
Pittilo&amp;#8217;s idea that imposing this sort of miseducation will help safety is obviously and dangerously wrong. The Department of Health must reject the Pittilo recommendations on those grounds.

Follow-up (Source: DC's goodscience)</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2688658</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:24:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2688658</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Consultation opens on Pittilo report: help to stop Department of Health making fool of itself</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2670815&amp;cid=t_227982_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D2007</link>
            <description>Conclusion
Recent events show that the halcyon days for alternative medicine are over. When the Pittilo report first appeared, it was greeted with derision in the media. For example, in The Times Alice Miles wrote

 &amp;#8220;This week came the publication of the Report to Ministers from the Department of Health Steering Group on the Statutory Regulation of Practitioners of Acupuncture, Herbal Medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine and Other Traditional Medicine Systems Practised in the UK. Otherwise known as twaddle.&amp;#8221;

In the Independent, Dominic Lawson wrote

So now we will have degrees in quackery.
What, really, is the difference between acupuncture and psychic surgery?


People will no doubt continue to use it and that is their right and their responsibility. But if the government w...</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2670815</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:45:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2670815</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Prince of Wales Foundation for magic medicine: spin on the meaning of ‘integrated’.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2414821&amp;cid=t_227982_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1466</link>
            <description>This study is no more informative than the infamous Spence (2005) &amp;#8217;study&amp;#8217; of the same type, which seems to be the only thing that homeopaths can produce to support their case.
There is an excellent analysis of the Northern Ireland &amp;#8217;study&amp;#8217; by Andy Lewis, The Northern Ireland NHS Alternative Medicine &amp;#8216;Trial&amp;#8217;.  He explains patiently, yet again, what constitutes evidence and why studies like this are useless.
His analogy start
&amp;#8221; . . . the Apple Marketing Board approach the NHS and ask for £200,000 to do a study to show the truth behind the statement &amp;#8216;An apple a day keeps the doctor away&amp;#8217;. The Minister, being particularly fond of apples, agrees and the study begins.&amp;#8221;
16.30 Social enterprise and whole systems integrated care.  Dee Ky...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2414821</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 07:18:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2414821</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rachel Roberts tries to defend homeopathy but breaches the Cancer Act 1939</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2217362&amp;cid=t_227982_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1196</link>
            <description>Recently I wrote a piece for the National Health Executive (&amp;#8221;the Independent Journal for Senior Health Service Managers&amp;#8221;), with the title Medicines that contain no medicine and other follies.
In the interests of what journalists call balance (but might better be called equal time for the Flat Earth Society), an article appeared straight after mine, [...] (Source: DC's goodscience)</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2217362</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:36:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2217362</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Thinking Positive? Think Again</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1849030&amp;cid=t_227982_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2008%2F10%2F03%2Fthinking-positive-think-again%2F</link>
            <description>If you google positive and cancer, you get over nine million hits.
How did the positive-thinking mantra become the default position for cancer prevention? That question has been on my mind ever since my own negative-thinking drumbeat found both an audience (Newsweek, blogosphere) and, naturally, its fair share of criticism.
For those who can remain upbeat throughout their diagnosis, treatment and aftermath, I say: Good for them. Some people are blessed with an optimistic outlook, either because of genetic predisposition or a happy childhood, or both. While cancer might give these lucky souls a bad day now and then, for the most part they stay steady even if their cancer progresses.
But the above model of coping is of no use to other cancer patients. They&amp;#8217;re in shock. The life they k...</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1849030</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:23:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1849030</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In Memory</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1728307&amp;cid=t_227982_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2008%2F08%2F01%2Fin-memory%2F</link>
            <description>Randy Pausch, 1960-2008
I&amp;#8217;ve been out of the loop. I just found out that 47-year-old professor Randy Pausch died of pancreatic cancer on July 25.
I did not know him. On YouTube I watched his &amp;#8220;last lecture,&amp;#8221; and on March 13, I sent him this email:
I thought about people like you after I was diagnosed with stage III ovarian cancer in 2001. I thought: Why is everything breast and prostate? What about ovarian? What about pancreatic??? 
The idea of lethal &amp;#8220;orphan&amp;#8221; cancers &amp;#8212; where the survivors don&amp;#8217;t live long enough to make a fuss &amp;#8212; continues to haunt me.  Like you, I went to Washington DC to lobby. The American Cancer Society happened to be holding a rally on Capitol Hill the same day. Survivors were marching and wearing banners that read: &amp;#8...</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1728307</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:08:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1728307</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

