<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: carbon dioxide emissions</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'carbon dioxide emissions'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22carbon+dioxide+emissions%22&t=%22carbon+dioxide+emissions%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:26:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Kerry and Lieberman Unveil Their Climate Bill: Such a Deal!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3560214&amp;cid=t_244091_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Ftbj9Cdviku0%2F</link>
            <description>By Patrick J. MichaelsI see that my colleague Sallie James has already blogged on the inherent protectionism in the Senate’s long-awaited cap-and-tax bill.  A summary was leaked last night by The Hill.
Well, we now have the real “discussion draft” of  “The American Power Act” [APA], sponsored by John Kerry (D-NH) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT).  Lindsay Graham (R-SC) used to be on the earlier drafts, but excused himself to have a temper tantrum.
So, while Sallie talked about the trade aspects of the bill, I’d like to blather about the mechanics, costs, and climate effects. If you don’t want to read the excruciating details, stop here and note that it mandates the impossible, will not produce any meaningful reduction of planetary warming, and it will subsidize just about every fo...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3560214</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:42:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3560214</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Photo of the Day: No Cars, or Just Nissan Cars?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3437677&amp;cid=t_244091_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fphoto-of-the-day-no-cars-or-nissan-cars%2F</link>
            <description>This eye-catching ad campaign in New York City seems to be urging consumers to ditch their cars, but the slick &amp;#8220;Journey to Zero&amp;#8221; campaign is actually put on by Nissan. With the help of Richard Saul Wurman (founder of TED), Nissan&amp;#8217;s year-long stunt aims to educate the public about carbon dioxide emissions – just in time for the release of Nissan&amp;#8217;s first electric vehicle next year. At the very least, it makes for a good photo.
Nissan&amp;#39;s clever Journey to Zero ad campaign in New York City.
via StreetsBlog
Post from: BlissTree
Photo of the Day: No Cars, or Just Nissan Cars? (Source: Breastfeeding 1-2-3)</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3437677</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:33:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3437677</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama Commands the Impossible</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3243780&amp;cid=t_244091_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FsDY0XenFj-I%2F</link>
            <description>By Patrick J. MichaelsToday’s New York Times reports that President Obama has &amp;#8220;ordered the rapid development of technology to capture carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of coal,” as well as mandating the production of more corn-based ethanol and financing farmers to produce &amp;#8220;cellulosic&amp;#8221; ethanol from waste fiber.
You&amp;#8217;ve got to like the president’s moxie.  Faced with his inability to pass health care reform and cap-and-trade, he now chooses to command the impossible and the inefficient.
Most power plants are simply not designed for carbon capture.  There isn&amp;#8217;t any infrastructure to transport large amounts of carbon dioxide, and no one has agreed on where to put all of it.  Corn-based ethanol produces more carbon dioxide in its life cycle than i...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3243780</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:01:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3243780</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Long Road to Copenhagen</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3012368&amp;cid=t_244091_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Ful9uy7lpje4%2F</link>
            <description>There are two different stories coming from the same political party on global warming, leading to only one conclusion: President Obama is about to (or has) ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to mandate some type of cap on U.S. carbon dioxide emissions.
Harry Reid and other democratic leaders in the Senate have clearly indicated that cap-and-trade legislation will be put off at least, until what they call &amp;#8220;spring&amp;#8221;, which is long after the upcoming UN climate conference in Copenhagen next month. At the same time, President Obama has said that the U.S., along with China, will announce some type of emissions cap in Copenhagen. Obviously this cannot refer to legislation that has yet to be voted on in the Senate.
President Obama keeps using the language &amp;#8220;operati...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3012368</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:25:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3012368</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama’s Energy Reading</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2452385&amp;cid=t_244091_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FTTLjvcnbj2g%2F</link>
            <description>The Washington Post writes about how President Obama became obsessed with grabbing our complex energy systems by the scruff of the neck and shaking them into something more appealing to Ivy League planners. I was struck by this vignette:
But even before the late-night session in July, Obama had begun to educate himself about energy and climate and to use those issues to define himself as a politician, say people who have advised him. He read a three-part New Yorker series on climate change, for instance, and mentioned it in three speeches.
It&amp;#8217;s great that he read a three-part series in the New Yorker. But has the president ever actually read anything by a climate change skeptic? Actually, a better term would be &amp;#8220;a climate change moderate.&amp;#8221; Leading &amp;#8220;skeptic&amp;#8221; Pa...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2452385</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:28:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2452385</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

