<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: carcinogenic</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'carcinogenic'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22carcinogenic%22&t=%22carcinogenic%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:31:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Aspartame: Facts Vs. Fiction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4018177&amp;cid=t_140753_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Faspartame-facts-vs-fiction%2F2010.09.30</link>
            <description>If you believe everything you read on the Internet, then is seems that a chemical found in thousands of products is causing an epidemic of severe neurological and systemic diseases, like multiple sclerosis and lupus. The FDA, the companies that make the product, and the “medical industrial complex” all know about the dangers of this chemical, but are hiding the truth from the public in order to protect corporate profits and avoid the pesky paper work that would accompany the truth being revealed.
The only glimmer of hope is a dedicated band of bloggers and anonymous email chain letter authors who aren’t afraid to speak the truth. Armed with the latest anecdotal evidence, unverified speculation, and scientifically implausible claims, they have been tirelessly ranting about the evils o...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4018177</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:00:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4018177</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Being Proactive About a Healthier Environment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3635983&amp;cid=t_140753_136_f&amp;fid=36032&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.everydayhealth.com%2Fblog%2Flife-with-breast-cancer%2Fbeing-proactive-about-a-healthier-environment%2F</link>
            <description>As part of my healthy life makeover, I am learning about potentially harmful toxins and chemicals in my home and my environment. I watched Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s special report Toxic America on CNN and was surprised to learn that there are over 80,000 chemicals in use in America, but only 200 have been tested. I was further shocked to hear that carcinogenic chemicals in mascara, nail polish, and other cosmetics that have banned from use in Europe are still being used in cosmetics sold in this country.
Having the BRCA gene mutation means that the gene that stabilizes DNA and prevents cells from growing out of control is not functioning properly. Without this mechanism, there is a greater chance of developing a breast cancer tumor. This started me thinking that maybe there is something externa...</description>
            <author>Life with Breast Cancer</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3635983</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:14:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3635983</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>American Cigarettes More Toxic Than Foreign Smokes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3621636&amp;cid=t_140753_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Famerican-cigarettes-more-toxic-than-foreign-cigarettes%2F</link>
            <description>Photo from Flickr user dopesmuglar
European stereotypes practically revolve around slowly-smoked cigarettes and smoky cafes, but it turns out their smoking habits might actually be healthier than ours: Americans are getting a higher dose of the most deadly carcinogens in cigarettes, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. American cigarettes are made from the &amp;#8220;American blend&amp;#8221; tobacco, which has higher levels of carcinogenic nitrosamines because of growing and curing methods.
While it might be tempting to get your pen pal across the Atlantic to send you care packages full of less-toxic British cigarettes, we suggest you use this as yet another reason to kick the habit for good.
via LA Times
Post from: BlissTree
American Cigarettes More Toxic Than Foreign Smok...</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3621636</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:13:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3621636</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pet-Friendly: Green Living for Dogs and Cats</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3610311&amp;cid=t_140753_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fpet-friendly-green-living-for-dogs-and-cats%2F</link>
            <description>photo: Thinkstock
Many of us try to be as eco-friendly as our budgets allow. Green thinking probably has spread to a variety of areas in your life – shopping, eating, cleaning habits. But what about Fido or Mittens? Check out these tips on how to make your pet&amp;#8217;s life more eco-friendly.
1. Check out what type of cat litter you buy; if it&amp;#8217;s lumping clay, it could expose you to carcinogenic silica dust. Switch to one made from pine, wheat, or newspaper, like Swheat Scoop.
2. Make sure the flea or tick treatments you use aren&amp;#8217;t toxic. They could contain pesticides that leave residue on your pet&amp;#8217;s fur, and cause them to have brain or nervous system damage. Check out some natural treatments for animals here.
3. Reconsider what your pet eats. Some pet foods contain chemi...</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3610311</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:41:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3610311</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Firefighters and Bladder Cancer Risk</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1454885&amp;cid=t_140753_136_f&amp;fid=36051&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FCancerCommentary%2F%7E3%2F294196026%2F</link>
            <description>The well known major risk factors for developing bladder cancer are prolonged exposure to certain environmental pollutants and chemicals.
As the body absorbs carcinogenic chemicals, such as cigarette smoke, the chemicals are transferred to the blood, filtered out by the kidneys and expelled from the body through the urine.
Greater concentrations of chemicals in the urine can damage the endothelial lining of the bladder and increase a patient&amp;#8217;s odds of developing transitional cell carcinoma (TCC).
One group of people that are regularly exposed to smoke and chemical fumes are firefighters – more than any other group.

Now, University of California –San Francisco reported at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA), research findings suggesting that...</description>
            <author>Cancer Commentary</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1454885</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:21:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1454885</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Smokeless tobacco worse than cigarettes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=807320&amp;cid=t_140753_87_f&amp;fid=34865&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecancerblog.com%2F2007%2F08%2F19%2Fsmokeless-tobacco-worse-than-cigarettes%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: Research, Smoking, Daily newsYou might think, like many people do, that smokeless tobacco products are safe alternatives to cigarettes. Wrong. According to researchers at the University of Minnesota Cancer Center, smokeless tobacco users are exposed to higher amounts of carcinogenic molecules than cigarette smokers. In a study of 182 users of chewing tobacco or oral snuff and 420 cigarette smokers, they found snuff users were exposed to higher levels of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) than smokers. NNK is a human carcinogen known to produce lung cancer. In laboratory animals, it also contributes to cancers of the pancreas, nasal mucosa, and liver.Published in the August issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &amp; Prevention, this study serves to remind ...</description>
            <author>The Cancer Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=807320</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">807320</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

