<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: ceiling</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'ceiling'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22ceiling%22&t=%22ceiling%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:38:13 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>“A Closed ‘Super Congress’? Oh, I Don’t Think So.”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5103328&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F9Vuhjuw4Qh8%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperThat was my inner conversation when I heard that the &amp;#8220;Super Congress&amp;#8221;* (or &amp;#8220;Super Committee&amp;#8221;) created by the debt ceiling deal might operate behind closed doors.
Congress is free to create any committee it wants, of course. Congress determines the rules of its proceedings. But ordinary committees and subcommittees are too opaque. A &amp;#8220;Super Committee&amp;#8221; should lead&amp;#8212;not lag&amp;#8212;in transparent operations.
In a forthcoming report on government transparency, we&amp;#8217;ll be looking at the kinds of things committees should be publishing in computer-useable formats, and in real time or near-real-time: meeting notices, transcripts, written testimonies, live video, original bills, amendments to bills, motions, and votes. There are ways that many ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5103328</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:39:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5103328</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Flap’s Links and Comments for August 2nd through August 4th</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096686&amp;cid=t_134938_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FFullosseousflapsDentalBlog%2F%7E3%2F2-4j9LKSDHU%2F</link>
            <description>These are my links for August 2nd through August 4th:

Sarah Palin Hacker Moves to Halfway House &amp;#8211; The man convicted of hacking Sarah Palin&amp;#039;s e-mail account was released from federal prison and is now spending time in a halfway house.
David Kernell left a fenceless minimum-security federal prison in Ashland, Kentucky, where inmates are put to work on landscaping and building maintenance for between $0.12 and $0.40 per hour for the halfway house, according to a Tennessee television station.
Kernell was convicted last year of breaking into to Palin&amp;#039;s Yahoo e-mail account during the 2008 presidential election. He outsmarted Yahoo&amp;#039;s password reset system by correctly answering questions using information about Palin that was easily available on the Internet &amp;#8212; a techn...</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096686</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 02:02:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096686</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More Cost Data and Better Debt Insight</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096164&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FLrRlWVwpsXk%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperData-transparent government is still a ways off, but some small steps forward are underway. To wit, my project WashingtonWatch.com, which is adding new data going to the costs of bills in Congress.
As detailed in an announcement that went up this morning, many more bills on the site will have cost estimates associated with them, the product of research being done at the National Taxpayers Union Foundation. Some bills spend pennies or less per U.S. family. Some spend $5,000 per family and more. Wouldn&amp;#8217;t you like to know which are which?
The site has also begun displaying national debt information on a per-family, per-person, and per-couple basis. Your individual (official) debt&amp;#8212;just for being an American&amp;#8212;is about $45,000 dollars, your real debt far higher.
I&amp;#...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096164</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:38:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096164</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Debt Deal Signed, Fights over Military Spending Next</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096169&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FZOrZ812LqXk%2F</link>
            <description>By Benjamin H. FriedmanThe legislation signed by President Obama yesterday, as a solution to the debt ceiling debate, includes the possibility of cuts to military spending. But as Chris Preble points out, the legislation guarantees no defense cuts. Republicans will try to dump all the required cuts on non-defense areas. And the White House has already distanced itself from the prospect of any real defense budget cuts, as did Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. Both support only the first round of cuts, which will at best halt Pentagon growth at roughly inflation.
On The Skeptics blog, I take a more detailed look at deal&amp;#8217;s likely impact on military spending. I also examine its political effect, arguing that it will cause at least four political fights.
The first concerns war fun...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096169</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:29:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096169</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Debt Deal to Slow the Economy?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096172&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FtZIi4Y441gQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Chris EdwardsThe Washington Post reports that spending cuts in the budget deal threaten to slow the economy. The article quotes a number of economists who seem to harbor a rather extreme Keynesian bias in their thinking.
The deal would cut discretionary spending by just $21 billion in 2012, or just 0.6 percent of total federal spending that year. And that’s after federal spending has risen 22 percent since 2008 ($2.98 trillion in 2008 to about $3.63 trillion this year). Even if you believe that government spending helps the economy, it seems rather bizarre to claim that a 0.6 percent retrenchment after a 22 percent increase would hurt.
The other thing to note about these spending-cut worries is that, for Keynesians, it is the total amount of deficit spending that is the amount of econ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096172</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:01:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096172</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Turning Point?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096173&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FF6-7Vn4OSSM%2F</link>
            <description>By John SamplesGreg Sargent cites a CNN poll question:
As you may know, the agreement would cut about one trillion dollars in government spending over the next ten years with provisions to make additional spending cuts in the future. Regardless of how you feel about the overall agreement, do you approve or disapprove of the cuts in government spending included in the debt ceiling agreement?
Approve 65
Disapprove 30
Sargent continues:
Sixty five percent approve of deal’s spending cuts. But it gets worse. Of the 30 percent who disapprove, 13 percent think the cuts haven’t gotten far enough, and only 15 percent think the cuts go too far. One sixth of Americans agree with the liberal argument about the deal.
About 20 percent of Americans self-identify as liberals. This would suggest that ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096173</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:18:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096173</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On Debt Ceiling, Congress Kicks the Can</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096175&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FijhtsfNNy8E%2F</link>
            <description>By Caleb O. Brown
This week&amp;#8217;s bipartisan deal to raise the debt limit will do little in the way of actual spending cuts, it defers all the tough decisions on spending and debt to a &amp;#8220;SuperCongress&amp;#8221; committee and the deal will do little to protect the United States credit rating. Cato&amp;#8217;s Dan Mitchell, Jagadeesh Gokhale and Chris Edwards comment on the debt deal.
On Debt Ceiling, Congress Kicks the Can is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096175</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:06:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096175</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In Class War, It’s the “Middle” Ground that’s Key</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5086141&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FXHhlVhgZfyk%2F</link>
            <description>By Neal McCluskeyWan to know a major reason Washington won&amp;#8217;t make the cuts we need? Because winning elections is largely about getting &amp;#8220;middle-class&amp;#8221; votes, and just about any program can be spun as a savior for that big &amp;#8212; but rarely defined by politicians &amp;#8212; chunk of Americans.
Case in point, an animosity-stoking assertion uttered last week by House education committee Ranking Member George Miller.  As reported by CNN, the subject was the possibility of a cut being made to the federal Pell Grant program:
Rep. George Miller, a California Democrat, defended Pell Grant funding on Friday, calling it the &amp;#8220;great equalizer&amp;#8221; for millions of students.
&amp;#8220;Pell is the reason they are able to go to college and get ahead,&amp;#8221; Miller sai...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5086141</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:43:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5086141</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>American science and the budget crisis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5085584&amp;cid=t_134938_139_f&amp;fid=38879&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FVirologyBlog%2F%7E3%2Fsa2sstw4H7s%2F</link>
            <description>Eugenie Samuel Reich speculates about the effect on US science should the debt ceiling not be raised by 2 August 2011:
Republicans have made it clear that they will not cut defence spending, and Democrats are keen to protect social security and health-care programmes such as Medicare and Medicaid. Thus, the cuts are likely to fall on the roughly $600-billion discretionary, domestic budget, which includes funding for scientific agencies including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Energy&amp;#8217;s Office of Science. A reduction of $100 billion, applied across the board, would result in a 17% cut to such agencies.
Excellent discussion of best- and worst-case scenarios and their effect on science, &amp;#8216;an investment in future p...</description>
            <author>virology blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5085584</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:35:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5085584</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Deconstructing the Revenue Side of the Debt-Ceiling Deal: Yes, There’s a Real Threat of Higher Taxes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5086148&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FHxN0VDfJsuQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellPoliticians last night announced the framework of a deal to increase the debt limit. In addition to authorizing about $900 billion more red ink right away, it would require immediate budget cuts of more than $900 billion, though &amp;#8220;immediate&amp;#8221; means over 10 years and &amp;#8220;budget cuts&amp;#8221; means spending still goes up (but not as fast as previously planned).
But that&amp;#8217;s the relatively uncontroversial part. The fighting we&amp;#8217;re seeing today revolves around a &amp;#8220;super-committee&amp;#8221; that&amp;#8217;s been created to find $1.5 trillion of additional &amp;#8220;deficit reduction&amp;#8221; over the next 10 years (based on Washington math, of course).
And much of the squabbling deals with whether the super-committee is a vehicle for higher taxes. As with all k...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5086148</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:27:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5086148</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>We’re In This for the Long Haul</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5077656&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FuSU2KRKUUdU%2F</link>
            <description>By Roger PilonToday POLITICO Arena asks:
Is it the Senate&amp;#8217;s turn to take a crack at the debt ceiling?
My response:
Speaker Boehner has both the Constitution and convention on his side — &amp;#8220;money bills&amp;#8221; arise in the House. In fact, the Constitution is his strongest ally in his struggle to win the support of recalcitrant Tea Party members. They revere the document, after all, and no one has put the point better than Charles Krauthammer in this morning&amp;#8217;s Washington Post.
Boehner&amp;#8217;s bill, just to be clear, is a far cry from what this debt-ridden nation needs. As my colleague Chris Edwards put it yesterday, even the revised plan &amp;#8220;doesn&amp;#8217;t cut spending at all.&amp;#8221; It &amp;#8220;cuts&amp;#8221; only from the CBO baseline, which assumes constantly rising spendin...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5077656</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:40:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5077656</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>US Has Already Been Downgraded</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5062228&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F_DLOOm8e3pY%2F</link>
            <description>Lost in all the concerns over how Moody&amp;#8217;s and S&amp;P will view any deal to raise the debt ceiling and whether such a deal addresses our country&amp;#8217;s long term budget imbalances is the fact that at least three rating agencies have already downgraded U.S. government debt.  One of these agencies, Weiss Ratings, treats U.S. government debt as barely better than &amp;#8220;junk&amp;#8221; or speculative grade.
It would be easy to dismiss these agencies as irrelevant and attempting to simply grab attention, but at least one of these agencies, Egan-Jones, has a track record of correctly predicting problems at such companies as Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers that the major rating agencies missed until it was too late.  Egan-Jones also employs a business mode...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5062228</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:49:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5062228</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Flap’s Links and Comments for July 23rd on 18:59</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5057821&amp;cid=t_134938_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FFullosseousflapsDentalBlog%2F%7E3%2F-BwTVHJROKY%2F</link>
            <description>These are my links for July 23rd from 18:59 to 19:25:

How the White House killed the deal &amp;#8211; In an aggressive move, the House speaker&amp;rsquo;s office has put out a blow-by-blow on how the debt talks collapsed:
The White House is misleading reporters tonight by claiming that new revenue in the framework that was discussed would have been generated by letting the current tax rates expire. That is simply false. Under the framework, a CEILING was offered by the White House that would generate $800 billion in new revenue over ten years. This would be done through comprehensive tax reform that would clear out deductions, credits, and loopholes in the system &amp;ndash; and spur economic growth.
After the gang of six plan came out, the White House moved the goal posts and insisted on $400 billio...</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5057821</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 03:00:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5057821</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Doctors Should Participate In The Debt Ceiling Debate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5050583&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fwhy-doctors-should-participate-in-the-debt-ceiling-debate%2F2011.07.20</link>
            <description>Joe Scarborough reminds us that the divisions in American government are hardly new, paraphrasing Benjamin Franklin’s observation that “When you assemble a number of men, to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble . . . all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views. From such an assembly can a perfect production be expected?” (This comes from a September 17, 1787 speech by Mr. Franklin to urge ratification of the U.S. Constitution, read on his behalf because he was too ill to deliver it in person. The Constitution was ratified the same day.)
I suppose we should be encouraged that Congress’s prejudices, passions, errors of opinion, local interests and selfish views are as American as apple pie,...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5050583</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5050583</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Parallels to 1995 in Spending Fight</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5050534&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FzE5hTHeZnEM%2F</link>
            <description>The American welfare state has been in crisis for decades. Many of the problems faced in 1995 fight have become less tractable problems today. John Samples comments in yesterday&amp;#8217;s Cato Daily Podcast.

One notable difference between 1995 and today, Samples says, is that the GOP of 1995 kept Social Security off the chopping block for spending cuts.
Subscribe to the podcast here (RSS) and here (iTunes).
Parallels to 1995 in Spending Fight is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5050534</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:44:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5050534</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Day By Day July 15, 2011 – Real Estate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5028718&amp;cid=t_134938_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FFullosseousflapsDentalBlog%2F%7E3%2FKRryEun0bKc%2F</link>
            <description>Day By Day by Chris Muir
The whole idea of the President of the United States having to walk out of a debt ceiling meeting leaves everyone suspecting that their judgment of Obama is correct. He is an ego-centric, immature POL who will FLEE when the going gets tough. Remember when the McCain campaign nicknamed Obama &amp;#8220;The One.&amp;#8221;
Not a good character trait for someone who is the leader of the &amp;#8220;free world.&amp;#8221;
Now, a President who has not lead on deficit reducation and not produced a budget in the last two years, is giving the Congress and Republican Leaders a 36 hour deadline.
How quaint.
Obama has been AWOL and now expects immediate action &amp;#8211; HIS WAY.
What will POTUS do next = leave for Europe and declare he won&amp;#8217;t be back until the Republicans do THEIR job?
Pre...</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5028718</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:33:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5028718</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>I Hope I’m Wrong, But Here’s Why Republicans Will Lose the Debt-Limit Fight</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5028148&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fz1Zx0QAvbHM%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellThere are three reasons why I’m not very hopeful about the outcome of the debt-limit battle.
1. There is no unity in the GOP camp.
Republicans have been all over the map during this fight. Some of them want a balanced budget amendment. Some want a one-for-one deal of $2 trillion of spending cuts in exchange for a $2 trillion increase in the debt limit. Others want some sort of spending cap, akin to Senator Corker’s CAP Act. Some want to mix all these ideas together in a cut-cap-balance package. Others want Obamacare repeal.  And the latest proposal is Sen. McConnell’s proposal to let Obama unilaterally raise the debt limit.
These are mostly good ideas, but the failure to coalesce around one proposal – preferably one that is easy to understand – has made the ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5028148</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:00:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5028148</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>McConnell’s Cave-In and Boehner’s Opportunity</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5028153&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F2BZuoMHpplg%2F</link>
            <description>By Chris EdwardsSenate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has offered the president a way to raise the debt ceiling by $2.5 trillion without having to cut spending. The WaPo reports that “McConnell’s strategy makes no provision for spending cuts to be enacted.”
This appears to be an epic cave-in and completely at odds with McConnell’s own pronouncements in recent months that major budget reforms must be tied to any debt-limit increase.
House Republicans should obviously reject McConnell’s surrender, and they should do what they should have done months ago. They should put together a package of $2 trillion in real spending cuts taken straight from the Obama fiscal commission report and pass it through the House tied to a debt-limit increase of $2 trillion. Then they shouldn’t budge...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5028153</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:37:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5028153</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Debt Ceiling: Political Games</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4767979&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FqXPVz_SB4fA%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenBack in January I noted that some analysts believe that the statutory debt ceiling should be eliminated. They view the potential for political brinksmanship as creating an unnecessary risk that financial markets will get rattled if there’s a chance the government won’t make good on its debt obligations in a timely manner. I argued that “forcing policymakers to spar publicly over fiscal policy is healthy, especially at a time when analysts generally agree that the country is headed toward an economic catastrophe if Washington’s mounting debt isn’t brought under control.”
I maintain that view four months later, but an article in Politico illustrates the absurd political shenanigans that accompany debt ceiling deliberations.
Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) is building biparti...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4767979</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:20:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4767979</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Response to Joe Weisenthal’s Critique of My Politico Opinion Piece</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4734055&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fmk_JJ-d9Xfs%2F</link>
            <description>By Jagadeesh GokhaleYesterday I had an op-ed in Politico suggesting that U.S. lawmakers should consider not raising the federal debt limit (at least for now). I argued that freezing the ceiling would assure investors that the United States is serious about reducing its debt, and that it would serve as a commitment device for lawmakers and President Obama to forge and follow a serious debt-reduction strategy.
A financial website writer named Joe Weisenthal strongly disagreed with my column. He seems to misunderstand several of the points that I was making, and so I offer the following response to his comments:
From Weisenthal’s post:
Another day, another economist advocating that the US default on its debt.
The latest is Jagadeesh Gokhale of the Cato Institute, who has a big piece advo...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4734055</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:31:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4734055</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>It’s Bigger Than the Budget</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4704626&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FCDMCl8OnIqI%2F</link>
            <description>By Roger PilonToday POLITICO Arena asks:
Do the cuts (and increases) contained in the six-month spending bill House Republicans posted overnight make sense, and do they go far enough in attacking the deficit and national debt?
My response:
Today’s Arena question captures perfectly what’s missing from our current budget debate. In listing a few of the compromises contained in the six-month spending bill House Republicans posted overnight, and asking whether those cuts (and increases) go far enough in attacking the deficit and national debt, it invites us to imagine that America is one big family, arguing over how “we” should spend “our” money.
We’re not. As I wrote in last Thursday’s Wall Street Journal, we&amp;#8217;re a constitutional republic, populated by discrete individual...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4704626</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:33:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4704626</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Federal Budget Cap at 3%</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4560235&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FdixlovUbwG0%2F</link>
            <description>By Chris EdwardsThe federal government is approaching its legal borrowing limit, and fiscal conservatives in Congress are wondering what spending reforms they can extract in return for supporting a debt-limit increase. Various sorts of balanced budget amendments and debt limits relative to GDP are being kicked around. I support those ideas, but I fear that they may be too complicated to gain traction right now.
A simpler idea would be to impose a statutory limit on annual spending growth of 3 percent. If total federal outlays in a year were $4 trillion, the government couldn’t spend more than $4.12 trillion the next year. It would be that simple.
Such a limit would be easy for policymakers and the public to understand and enforce. It would put ongoing pressure on Congress to cut discreti...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4560235</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:16:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4560235</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>This Week in Government Failure</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4522086&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FzN9pJ3TR6_Q%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenOver at Downsizing Government, we focused on the following issues this week:

On getting out of Afghanistan.
$61 billion in spending cuts amounts to less than a third of what taxpayers will pay in interest on the debt alone this year.
The political stakes in the latest debt ceiling game are high. The  consequences of failing to use it as an opportunity to start reining in  the federal government are even higher.
The IRS is handing out &quot;free&quot; candy.
New data from the Federal Aviation Administration shows that reported air traffic control errors have increased by 81 percent since 2007.

This Week in Government Failure is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4522086</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:26:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4522086</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Buprenorphine Ceiling Effect</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3502994&amp;cid=t_134938_151_f&amp;fid=36896&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fv%2FlrqjJGoSQgc%26amp%3Bhl%3Den_US%26amp%3Bfs%3D1%26amp%3B</link>
            <description>In this video I explain why the ceiling effect is so important to the effects of buprenorphine for treating opiate dependence.


				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (Source: Suboxone Talk Zone)</description>
            <author>Suboxone Talk Zone</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3502994</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:15:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3502994</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tapering off methadone– bupe or no bupe?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3101069&amp;cid=t_134938_151_f&amp;fid=36896&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FSuboxoneTalkZone%2F%7E3%2Fk1550MxtWPI%2F</link>
            <description>A quickie question from a youtube viewer:
hiya&amp;#8211;  Wondering if you could tell me if this is a good idea.  I&amp;#8217;m almost at the end of my taper from methadone from having addiction to oxycontin. been on methadone coming up on 2 years and I&amp;#8217;m taking 8 mg a day.  and was thinking of asking my doctor to switch me over to Suboxone when i get down to 2 mg, use suboxone 2 or 3 months to help with the methadone withdrawal, and then taper off the Suboxone.
My doctor brought up Suboxone to me whe n i was at 30mg, but I didnt know anything about it, so I dismiised it.  Now i hear its a better treatment.  Any advice would be helpful.  I want off methadone very bad, I&amp;#8217;m just nervous about what comes at the end.  I have to continue working&amp;#8211; cant take much time off ...</description>
            <author>Suboxone Talk Zone</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3101069</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:54:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3101069</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is My Suboxone Dose Too High to Have Surgery?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2341900&amp;cid=t_134938_151_f&amp;fid=36896&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FSuboxoneTalkZone%2F%7E3%2F3vHWFoXQFnE%2F</link>
            <description>Thanks, all of you who wrote comments to my last post.  I remind everyone once again to consider taking your comments here and after writing them, also taking them to SuboxForum.com.  I am going to put up a new category to discuss topics that were initiated here;  it would be great to get a spirited, respectful &amp;#8216;give and take&amp;#8217; on some of these topics.  As I have mentioned before, the only thing that I will block on that site would be debating whether people on Suboxone are &amp;#8216;in Recovery&amp;#8217;&amp;#8211; just because there are plenty of other sites for that, and I want the forum to be for people who have made their decision&amp;#8211; and don&amp;#8217;t want to be harassed over it.  I will be upgrading that site shortly and changing the hosting account;  hopefully I will pull i...</description>
            <author>Suboxone Talk Zone</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2341900</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:27:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2341900</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Situationism in the Blogosphere - October, Part III</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1999416&amp;cid=t_134938_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F12%2F01%2Fsituationism-in-the-blogosphere-october-part-iii%2F</link>
            <description>Discussion with Robert Burton”
“In On Being Certain, neurologist Robert Burton challenges his readers to ask one of the most basic—and crucial—of questions: how do we know what we know? With an engaging, conversational style, he tackles the neuropsychological underpinnings of belief and certainty, carefully examining these ubiquitous dynamics in light of what is known about how the mind works.” Read more . . .
From Nueronarrative: “The Lucifer Effect: An Interview with Dr. Philip Zimbardo”
“Social psychologist [and Situationist contributor] Philip Zimbardo has been studying the anatomy of human psychology for nearly four decades. In the summer of 1971, Dr. Zimbardo created the classic Stanford Prison Experiment, a simulation of prison life that investigated a provocative...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1999416</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:01:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1999416</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An inspirational office smoking area</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=760480&amp;cid=t_134938_87_f&amp;fid=34866&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecardioblog.com%2F2007%2F07%2F26%2Fan-inspirational-office-smoking-area%2F</link>
            <description>Filed under: SmokingOffice smoking areas are notoriously drab and plain -- purely functional, with little decor besides places to stand and sit, and of course ashtrays everywhere. And the walls always have that yellowish hue and there's usually a token air freshener in the corner pathetically battling the noxious fumes. I sympathize with smokers because it is a really tough habit to break, but maybe this paint job on the walls and ceiling would help. There's nothing like being reminded of the consequences of such a bad habit by feeling like you're buried alive every time you light up! And while you're remodeling it might be fun to replace the regular ashtrays with these that cough and scream every time they get used. That smoking area will be fun times! (Sorry smokers, it's for your own go...</description>
            <author>The Cardio Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=760480</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">760480</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

