<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: census</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'census'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22census%22&t=%22census%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:24:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>How the DSM Developed: What You Might Not Know</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4992755&amp;cid=t_199506_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F07%2F02%2Fhow-the-dsm-developed-what-you-might-not-know%2F</link>
            <description>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is widely known as the bible of psychiatry and psychology.
But not many people know how this powerful and influential book came to be. Here&amp;#8217;s a brief look at the DSM’s evolution and where we are today.
The Need for Classification
The origins of the DSM date back to 1840 &amp;#8212; when the government wanted to collect data on mental illness. The term “idiocy/insanity” appeared in that year’s census.
Forty years later, the census expanded to feature these seven categories: “mania, melancholia, monomania, paresis, dementia, dipsomania and epilepsy.”
But there was still a need to gather uniform stats across mental hospitals. In 1917, the Bureau of the Census embraced a publication called the Statistical Manual for ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4992755</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:43:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4992755</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>PA Demographics: Who is the Typical Physician Assistant?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4945263&amp;cid=t_199506_175_f&amp;fid=39258&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FInsidePaTraining%2F%7E3%2F0f0O1GkZghI%2Ftypical-physician-assistant</link>
            <description>If you&amp;#8217;re trying to get a grasp of the physician assistant profession, you should probably know what the typical physician assistant looks like.  I just read the American Academy of Physician Assistants&amp;#8217; most recent census of the nation&amp;#8217;s PAs (2009 data), and learned a few things: &amp;#160; The typical physician assistant is female (About 65% [...]Visit us at Inside PA Training - Becoming A Physician Assistant (Source: Inside PA Training)</description>
            <author>Inside PA Training</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4945263</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:22:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4945263</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Strange Psychological Findings</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4803234&amp;cid=t_199506_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F05%2F09%2Fstrange-psychological-findings%2F</link>
            <description>In their excellent book, 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology, Lilienfeld and colleagues (2010) investigate popular psychology myths.  In addition to addressing these prevalent myths, the authors briefly discuss some “difficult to believe” psychological findings.  Some of the findings include:
Our brains contain approximately 3 million miles of neural connections.
People suffering from extreme forms of anterograde amnesia, an inability to consciously recall new information, often display implicit memories without being able to display them consciously.  As an example, they may show a negative emotional reaction when interacting with a doctor who has  been rude to them, even though they can’t recall meeting the doctor.

People who hold a pencil with their teeth find cartoons funn...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4803234</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 11:16:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4803234</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bye-bye, Ward &amp; June Cleaver; Hello, multi-cultural, digital-happy family</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4762764&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=38368&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FDisruptiveWomenInHealthCare%2F%7E3%2F7oPbEF1CU1s%2F</link>
            <description>By Jane Sarasohn-Kahn. “Ward and June Cleaver have left the building,” observe analysts at Nielsen. “The white, two-parent, ‘Leave it to Beaver’ family unit of the 1950s has evolved into a multi-layered, multi-cultural construct dominated by older, childless households,” starts a report from The Nielsen Company, The New Digital American Family.
Whatever ethnic flavor this Digital Family may represent, there’s one equalizer across all of them: the smartphone, which is owned by households across cultures and income levels.

First, the socio-demographics paint a picture of increasingly multi-cultural households. Recent immigrants to the U.S. accounted for 90% of population growth from 2000-2010, over-indexing for Hispanic and Asian communities. Hispanics are the fastest-growi...</description>
            <author>Disruptive Women in Health Care</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4762764</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:58:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4762764</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dogs, Hospitals, And Unintended Consequences</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4615103&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fdogs-hospitals-and-unintended-consequences%2F2011.03.19</link>
            <description>Every day I go to the emergency room to admit my adults, I can hear the screaming babies and toddlers. Sometimes, the screams are actually from their parents after realizing  how much their visit is going to  cost.  But most of the time it&amp;#8217;s really frightened kids in an unfamiliar environment.
Happy&amp;#8217;s hospital used to hand out hospital stickers so kids would associate emergency rooms with a fun place to hang out.  It turns out, after  intense behind the scenes discussions with administration, that this policy was a covert attempt to increase the volume of our pediatric emergency room volumes.
After looking at the numbers, and understanding how hospitals get paid,I have now come on board and am part of a committee think tank that does nothing more than think of ways to get ...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4615103</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4615103</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Healthcare Homicide: Safer To Work In A Prison Than In A Hospital?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4382764&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fhealthcare-homicide-safer-to-work-in-a-prison-than-in-a-hospital%2F2011.01.21</link>
            <description>There&amp;#8217;s been a lot of stories in the news lately about homicides committed in hospitals. Just out of curiosity, I went to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) website and pulled some data from their Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. It confirmed what I suspected &amp;#8212; that homicides of workers in hospitals have increased at twice the rate as correctional facilities, where worker homicides have remained stable. Here&amp;#8217;s the graph I was able to make from the BLS data:

The red bars (hospital murders) are up to six and seven homicides per year while the blue bars (correctional facility murders) have remained stable at about three per year. This is only for the employees who have been murdered, not all murder victims.
When we consider the cost and repercussions of increased ...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4382764</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4382764</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Seeking Happily Ever After: Some Tips for Singles</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4018217&amp;cid=t_199506_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F09%2F30%2Fseeking-happily-ever-after-some-tips-for-singles%2F</link>
            <description>According to the U.S. Census Bureau, about 40 percent of adults were single in 2009. Researchers have found that the &amp;#8220;single stigma&amp;#8221; is worst for women in their mid-20&amp;#8217;s through mid-30&amp;#8217;s. Women 35 and older are more content with their single status and don&amp;#8217;t complain of social pressure as much as younger singles.
Michelle Cove, director and producer of the feature-length documentary, &amp;#8220;Seeking Happily Ever After,&amp;#8221; has just compiled a book by the same title.
In between its covers, Michelle presents simple but smart steps for singles to identify their relationship needs and goals, and learns how to pursue healthier, stronger relationships. I have pulled the following suggestions from chapter four, &amp;#8220;The Princess in Waiting.&amp;#8221;

1. See the pri...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4018217</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:28:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4018217</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Experience Is a Good Teacher, But She Sends in Terrific Bills</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3933078&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FtfPNovv-7YU%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim Harper[above quote attibuted to American writer Minna Thomas Antrim (1861-1950)]
The AP reports on trouble facing the Chinese census:
After years of reforms that have reduced the government&amp;#8217;s once-pervasive involvement in most people&amp;#8217;s lives, some Chinese are proving reluctant to give up personal information and harboring suspicions about what the government plans to do with their details. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3933078</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:59:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3933078</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mental Health Statistics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3526797&amp;cid=t_199506_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F05%2F03%2Fmental-health-statistics%2F</link>
            <description>May is Mental Health Month again, so it&amp;#8217;s also a good time to review the mental health statistics behind mental illness. Some of the statistics going around aren&amp;#8217;t entirely accurate, because they&amp;#8217;re based upon outdated web pages on the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) website. This misinformation is then propagated by well-meaning people and organizations, including NAMI and others. Sadly, the NIMH website is not as accurate or up-to-date as people like to think it is (I think that because it&amp;#8217;s a government resource, people just assume it&amp;#8217;s accurate and correct).
For instance, the NIMH Statistics page puts data into context of 2004 Census data. Well, it&amp;#8217;s 2010, not 2004, and we have more up-to-date Census data. Also according to the more recent...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3526797</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:45:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3526797</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Census Asks Too Much</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3374107&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FBYj8y6F3eFY%2F</link>
            <description>By David BoazEveryone in America, I presume, has just received a letter from the U.S. Census Bureau urging us to fill out our Census forms. Seems like a very expensive way to tell us to watch for the form to arrive in the mail. But I&amp;#8217;m particularly interested in why they say we should promptly fill out the form:
Your response is important. Results from the 2010 Census will be used to help each community get its fair share of [federal] government funds for highways, schools, health facilities, and many other programs you and your neighbors need. Without a complete, accurate census, your community may not receive its fair share.
Obviously this is a zero-sum game. If my neighbors and I all fill out the form, then you and your neighbors will get less from the common federal trough. But ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3374107</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:33:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3374107</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Census Meets the Patriot Act</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3362381&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fsg9Wjs6jdp0%2F</link>
            <description>By Julian SanchezThe Washington Post reports that the Justice Department recently sent out a letter to the chairs of the Asian Pacific, black, and Hispanic caucuses in Congress, reassuring them that the Patriot Act&amp;#8217;s expansion of information-gathering powers, including the controversial Section 215, does not override federal statutes guaranteeing the confidentiality of census data.  DOJ&amp;#8217;s view, according to Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich, is that &amp;#8220;if Congress intended to override these protections, it would say so clearly and explicitly.&amp;#8221;
Section 215, recall, is colloquially referred to as the &amp;#8220;business records&amp;#8221; provision of Patriot, though in fact it permits investigators to obtain &amp;#8220;any tangible thing&amp;#8221; from a designated person or e...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3362381</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:37:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3362381</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Census: Constitutional but Very Costly</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3290801&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F5slCepPOlMI%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenMost activities undertaken by the federal government have no constitutional basis. One exception is the Census carried out every 10 years to determine the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives. Alas, it appears that even this core federal function is subject to cost overruns and waste, as a new report from the Department of Commerce’s inspector general illustrates.
Quarterly updates of progress on the census by the inspector general were required by legislation in 2008, which gave the Census Bureau an additional $210 million “to help cover spiraling 2010 decennial costs stemming from the bureau’s problematic efforts to automate major field operations, major flaws in its cost-estimating methods, and other issues.”
So how are things going?
The Census has b...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3290801</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:13:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3290801</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Census and the Constitution</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3266891&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fo7QfAW-Jra8%2F</link>
            <description>By David BoazThe Washington Post profiles Daniel Weinberg, assistant director of the Census, who says:
&amp;#8220;Since the decennial census is in our Constitution, it is the most important task a government statistician can undertake. The census is key to our democratic society by making sure that our congressional districts are equal in size so that we have representative democracy. To be involved in something that is central to our democracy is pretty exciting.&amp;#8221;
Good point. The census is indeed in the Constitution, Article I, Section 2. The Constitution provides that every ten years an enumeration of the population of each state shall be made in order to allocate members of the House of Representatives.
Unfortunately, the census has been loaded down with intrusive questions not author...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3266891</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:45:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3266891</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Census Paves the Way for Subsidies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3142514&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FDVMBZvjcGTY%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenOur bloated government does a lot of things it shouldn’t, but the decennial census is one of the handful of federal activities the Constitution approves of. The census was intended simply to determine the number of seats each state would have in the House of Representatives. Today, census data is plugged into government formulas to determine how more than $400 billion in subsidies from the federal welfare state are allocated to state and local governments.
The impetus to grab federal dollars caused controversy back in December when the National Association of Latino Elected Officials distributed a census promo that read, &amp;#8220;This is how Jesus was born…Joseph and Mary participated in the Census.&amp;#8221; The group’s website says that, “For each uncounted Latino, more ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3142514</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:10:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3142514</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Census confirms Mormons have many children</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2688836&amp;cid=t_199506_131_f&amp;fid=34994&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnxp.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F08%2Fcensus-confirms-mormons-have-many.php</link>
            <description>I've been poking around the Census data sets for a few days now. I want to merge them with the longevity stuff soon, but while was at it I decided to check to see how variation in geography related to variation in fertility. You can go to the GSS and see all sorts of national trends, but I thought a county-by-county view would be of interest. Click the images for bigger versions. The fertility is defined as &quot;women with births in the past 12 months; rate per 1,000 women.&quot; Coming out of the American Community Survey. All the data are for Non-Hispanic white women. (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2688836</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:35:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2688836</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Many Uninsured Are There?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2510271&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FEX0rLLmjFCE%2F</link>
            <description>The Wall Street Journal&amp;#8217;s Numbers Guy tackles the question:
The Census Bureau estimates that the number of uninsured amounts to 45.7 million people. But the agency might be over-counting by millions due to faulty assumptions&amp;#8230;
Even though legislation won&amp;#8217;t cover many of them, illegal immigrants are especially difficult to enumerate: Few raise their hands to be counted. Prof. [Jonathan] Gruber estimates they make up about 13% of the uninsured today, or nearly six million people of that 45 million number&amp;#8230;
Of the rest, some people are eligible for health insurance but don&amp;#8217;t know it and many can afford it but don&amp;#8217;t want it. About 43% of uninsured nonelderly adults have incomes greater than 2.5 times the poverty level, according to a report released Tuesday by...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2510271</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:53:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2510271</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Robert H. Frank, A 200% Tax Even Socialists Will Hate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2375864&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F-I-SgBwHDh0%2F</link>
            <description>In the latest issue of Forbes, Cornell University economist Robert H. Frank is pushing “A Tax Even Libertarians Can Love.” I hope he wasn’t counting on this libertarian’s support.
What he advocates is “replacing the income tax with a progressive tax on spending. &amp;#8230;A family&amp;#8217;s income minus its savings is its consumption, and that amount minus a large standard deduction &amp;#8212; say, $30,000 a year for a family of four &amp;#8212; would be its taxable consumption. &amp;#8230;Rates would start low, perhaps 20%, then rise gradually with total consumption. &amp;#8230;With savings tax-exempt, top marginal tax rates on consumption would have to be significantly higher than current top rates on income.”
His concept of “significantly higher” includes tax rates of 100-200% on marginal i...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2375864</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:50:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2375864</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Homeless Scare Numbers</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2255990&amp;cid=t_199506_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F2nX4f9l5GWI%2F</link>
            <description>The National Center on Family Homelessness has generated headlines today by releasing a report that claims “one in 50 children is homeless in the United States every year.” That would be a total of 1.5 million homeless children, a truly shocking figure. The number is all the more shocking because the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development says there actually only 671,000 people were homeless in 2007 (the last year for which data is available), of which only about 249,000 were people in families. Assuming even one adult per family would mean there were around 166,000 homeless children, far too many, but also far fewer than 1.5 million.
What accounts for the discrepancy? First, the National Center uses an incredibly broad definition of homeless. For example, in addition to thos...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2255990</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:39:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2255990</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Census and Americans With Disabilities</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2073994&amp;cid=t_199506_111_f&amp;fid=34712&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigitaldoorway.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F12%2Fcensus-and-americans-with-disabilities.html</link>
            <description>The U.S. Census Bureau has released a report which recounts important and thought-provoking information regarding the millions of Americans who are currently living with disabilities. (The report can be downloaded as a pdf file here).The report, based on the most recent census data available, reveals that 54.4 million Americans (18.7 % of the population) are currently classified as disabled, and 35 million (12%) of Americans qualify as severely disabled. Both percentages have risen since the last census, and the numbers are most likely expected to rise again in subsequent studies of a significantly aging American population.In terms of needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) or Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), 11 million people (4.1 % of the population) ov...</description>
            <author>Digital Doorway</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2073994</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:47:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2073994</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What is CData? And what could a dentist use CData for?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1991177&amp;cid=t_199506_125_f&amp;fid=36046&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdentistrylibrary.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F11%2Fwhat-is-cdata-and-what-could-dentist.html</link>
            <description>CData Online is a new product recently released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics and it is designed to manage Census data. It is a free service which allows you to create and customise your own tables, map your data and view it in a variety of graphs.Once you graduate from Uni you are most likely to end up in a private practice. Combined with the National survey of adult oral health 2004-06 , CData could help you create a detailed community profile of the area where you will set up your surgery. Could be a powerful tool to work out where wealthy people with bad teeth live ;-)On a more serious note, ABS is now offering free CDATA information sessions at the ABS office in Sydney on the following dates:Tuesday 2 December 2008 10am and 2pmThursday 18 December 2008 10am and 2pmThursday 15...</description>
            <author>DentistryLibrary@Sydney</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1991177</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:58:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1991177</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

