<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: chiropractor</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'chiropractor'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22chiropractor%22&t=%22chiropractor%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:23:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Fear In The Other Room</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4734710&amp;cid=t_166649_180_f&amp;fid=38607&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fsuccessbeginstoday%2FBHWQ%2F%7E3%2FUz_yH9aAH5A%2F</link>
            <description>Last week a simple action caused me intense pain. It wasn&amp;#8217;t answering the phone or lifting a couch. No&amp;#8230; It was much simpler&amp;#8230; And much more insidious.
I bent over to put my shoes on and my back went out.
No warning. No signs of distress.
I didn&amp;#8217;t see it coming.
Just a simple action that sent waves of pain across my lower back.
Once the pain came, I could hardly walk. I figured a hot shower might fix it up. I got in the shower, but even the hottest water didn&amp;#8217;t relieve the pain. I could barely get around and my wife had to help me put my shoes and socks on. I drove to work and sat in subdued pain all day.
This was a bad one.
I had pain like this before when I was a mechanic, but it had been years since it had acted up. I had just come back from an amazing cruise...</description>
            <author>Success Begins Today</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4734710</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:27:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4734710</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Scandal of the University of Wales and the Quality Assurance Agency</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4167972&amp;cid=t_166649_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D3675</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up
The mainstream media eventually catch up with bloggers. BBC1 TV (Wales) produced an excellent TV programme that exposed the enormous degree validation scam run by the University of Wales. It also exposed the uselessness of the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). Both these things have been written about repeatedly here for some years. It was good to see them getting wider publicity.
Watch the video of the BBC programme, &amp;quot;Week In Week Out &amp;#8211; University Challenged.&amp;quot; &amp;#8220;The programme examines how pop stars and evangelical Christians are running colleges offering courses validated by the University of Wales.&amp;#8221; (I make a brief appearance, talking about validation of degrees in Chinese Medicine).

In October 2008 I posted Another worthless validation: the Un...</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4167972</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:45:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4167972</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medical Moonlighting: How About Doctor Derby?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3542601&amp;cid=t_166649_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fmedical-moonlighting-how-about-doctor-derby%2F2010.05.07</link>
            <description>Medical moonlighting. That&amp;#8217;s what you&amp;#8217;d better be thinking about as the healthcare finance reform trap continues its destined pursuit of bankrupting America.
The only possible outcome to all of this mess is the biggest man-made healthcare recession of all time that will make the current economic implosion look like a walk in the park.
What are some possible second jobs for doctors? Every week I get offers to respond to surveys and telephone conferences by private industry asking for my opinions on up-and-coming pharmaceuticals. Just the other day I was offered $500 for a 90-minute interview. (That reminds me, I had better call them back!)
Other second jobs for doctors? (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at The Happy Hospitalist* (Source: Better Heal...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3542601</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3542601</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The WAR Continues</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3342665&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=35606&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theangriestpharmacist.com%2F2010%2F03%2F08%2Fthe-war-continues%2F</link>
            <description>Which war you ask? Of course, the WAR BETWEEN PHARMACISTS AND CHIROPRACTORS. In honor of my chiropractor, who has been made privy to this site, I&amp;#8217;ve made a couple funny t-shirts. We&amp;#8217;ve had a few good conversations about beliefs, traditions, and principles of both of our professions. I&amp;#8217;ve cited many peer-reviewed research studies. He&amp;#8217;s cited a lot of&amp;#8230;well&amp;#8230;anecdotal evidence&amp;#8230;
Pharmacist 1,  Chiropractors 0

It could be worst I could be a silly CHIROPRACTOR
Love, your local PHARMACIST
It&amp;#8217;s long been known that there are a few QUACK chiropractors out there, and the vast majority of chiropractors don&amp;#8217;t trust pharmaceuticals and ESPECIALLY VACCINES/Antibiotics (other than NSAIDS/Oxicams, COX-2, and a select few other drugs). We might as well...</description>
            <author>The Angriest Pharmacist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3342665</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:27:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3342665</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Simon Singh on chiropractic: “Beware the spinal trap”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2649004&amp;cid=t_166649_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1980</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up
Today, 29 July 2009, a large number of magazines and blogs will publish simultaneously Simon Singh&amp;#8217;s article. The Guardian was forced to withdraw it, but what he said must be heard (even if the word &amp;#8216;bogus&amp;#8217; is now missing).
This is an edited version if the article in the Guardian that resulted in the decision of the British Chiropractic Association to sue Singh for libel. That decision was bad for Singh, though its effects could yet be good for the rest of the world, Firstly the decision to use law rather than rational argument stands a good chance of destroying chiropractic entirely because its claims have now come under scrutiny as never before, and they have been found wanting. Secondly, the support for Singh has been so enormous that there must now b...</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2649004</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:01:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2649004</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>British Chiropractic Association produces its plethora of evidence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2523001&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1775</link>
            <description>Conclusion Chiropractic spinal manipulation is no more effective than placebo in the treatment of infantile colic. This study emphasises the need for placebo controlled and blinded studies when investigating alternative methods to treat unpredictable conditions such as infantile colic.
More on this dishonest selectivity can be found at  Holfordwatch. 
No doubt there will soon be more analyses of what passes, in the eyes of the BCA, for evidence, The nine papers they cite for colic are truly pathetic. Not a single one of them amounts to anything that would be recognised as evidence in the real world. And papers that do provide real evidence are not mentioned.

Follow-up
As always, the blogs provided a very fast response to a document that appeared only late last night.&amp;nbsp; And, as always,...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2523001</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:58:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2523001</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The General Chiropractic Council (GCC) wants to waive the rules</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2523002&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1764</link>
            <description>A flood of complaints against chiropractors has arrived at the General Chiropractic Council (GCC) in the wake of the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) v Singh affair. It is really rather beautiful that people have put some such enormous effort into writing complaints for no gain to themselves. 
My own paltry two complaints to the GCC produced an interesting reaction. Yesterday I was told by the GCC
&amp;#8220;Under the provisions of the General Chiropractic Council (Investigating Committee) Rules

2000 (&amp;#8221;the Rules&amp;#8221;), the Committee is required to invite you to make a statement of evidence in relation to your complaint by way of statutory declaration or affidavit. If you wish to, you can discuss your complaint with a solicitor who acts on behalf of the Committee who could help y...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2523002</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:20:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2523002</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Peter Dixon, chair of the General Chiropractic Council, seems to be a bit careless about evidence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2473435&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1718</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up
Peter Dixon is a chiropractor. He is chair of the General Chiropractic Council (GCC). He was also a member of the hotly-disputed NICE low back pain guidance group that endorsed (you guessed it) the use of chiropractic, a decision that has led to enormous criticism of the standards of the National Institute of health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
As a consequence largely of the decision of the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) to sue Simon Singh for defamation, there has been an unprecedented interest taken in the claims made by chiropractors in general.
Peter Dixon has a problem because something like 600 individual complaints about unjustified health claims have been sent to the GCC. Even when a web site does not claim to be able to benefit things like asthma and ...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2473435</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:17:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2473435</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Medicines and Health Regulatory Authority breaks the law?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2473436&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1704</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up
This is another short interruption in the epic self-destruction of chiropractors.&amp;nbsp; In a sense it is more serious.&amp;nbsp; One expects quacks to advocate quackery.&amp;nbsp; What you don&amp;#8217;t expect is that the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) will endorse it.&amp;nbsp; Neither do you expect the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to betray its mandate to make sure that medicines work.
The saga of the NICE low back pain guidance has been the subject of a deluge of criticism, It seems doubtful that the guidance can survive, not least because of its absurd endorsement of chiropractic, at a time when chiropractic is undergoing self-immolation as a consequence of the persecution of Simon Singh by the British Chiropractic Association (see he...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2473436</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:37:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2473436</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The McTimoney Chiropractic Association would seem to believe that chiropractic is “bogus”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2469530&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1686</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up
That isn&amp;#8217;t my title. It is the title of a post by Richard Lanigan, a chiropractor with whom I&amp;#8217;ve been corresponding. He has a major grudge against the General Chiropractic Council. And in particular he is disaffected about the GCC&amp;#8217;s chair, Peter Dixon, about whom he has written a lot, I can&amp;#8217;t judge the details of his complaints, but they are laid out in detail on his blog, http://chiropracticlive.com/
Particular interest attaches to his recent revelation of a letter that was sent on July 8th to its members by the McTimoney Chiropractic Association. The McTimoney sect of chiropractic are the &amp;#8216;true believers&amp;#8217; in the most mystical codswallop aspects of the subject. Oddly enough their College has been validated by the University of Wales, I...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2469530</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:06:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2469530</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Simon Singh will appeal! Keep the Libel Laws out of Science</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2452540&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1630</link>
            <description>The battle for freedom of speech is under way.




Simon Singh is a great science writer and communicator. He is author of The Big Bang, The Code Book, Fermat&amp;#8217;s Last Theorem, and, with Edzard Ernst, Trick or Treatment. They are superb books (buy from Amazon).





When Singh had the temerity to express an honest opinion, based on the evidence, about that very curious branch of alternative medicine known as chiropractic, the British Chiropractic Association sued Singh for defamation.This was their substitute for producing evidence for their bizarre claims.
Chiropractors seem to be particularly fond of litigation, perhaps because they are so short of evidence. Having had legal threats from them myself, I know how scary it can be, Luckily I was saved by a feisty a journal editor.  Sing...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2452540</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 23:02:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2452540</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The NICE fiasco, Part 3. Too many vested interests, not enough honesty</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2452542&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1593</link>
            <description>Jump to follow-up
The first post was NICE falls for Bait and Switch by acupuncturists and chiropractors: it has let down the public and itself. 
That was followed by NICE fiasco, part 2. Rawlins should withdraw guidance and start again.
Since then, something of a maelstrom has engulfed NICE, so it&amp;#8217;s time for an update.
It isn&amp;#8217;t only those who are appalled that NHS should endorse voodoo medicine on the basis of very slim evidence who are asking NICE to rethink their guidance on low back pain. Pain specialists are up in arms too, and have even started a blog, &amp;#8216;Not Nearly as NICE as you think &amp;#8230;&amp;#8216;, to express their views. Equally adverse opinions are being expressed in the Britsh Medical Journal. A letter there is signed by over 50 specialists in pain medicine. It ...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2452542</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:20:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2452542</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NICE fiasco, part 2.  Rawlins should withdraw guidance and start again</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2441449&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1542</link>
            <description>Conclusions 
Relative to “best care” in general practice, manipulation followed by exercise achieved a moderate benefit at three months and a small benefit at 12 months; spinal manipulation achieved a small to moderate benefit at three months and a small benefit at 12 months; and exercise achieved a small benefit at three months but not 12 months.




In other words, none of them worked very well. The paper failed to distinguish between manipulation by physiotherapists, chiropractors and osteopaths and so missed a valuable chance to find out whether there is an advantage to employing people from alternative medicine (the very problem that this NICE guidance should have dealt with)
Steve Vogel, another member of the guidance development group, is an osteopath. Osteopathy has cast off it...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2441449</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:09:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2441449</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NICE falls for Bait and Switch by acupuncturists and chiropractors: it has let down the public and itself</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2441450&amp;cid=t_166649_97_f&amp;fid=36415&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D1516</link>
            <description>First the MHRA lets down the public by allowing deceptive labelling of sugar pills (see here, and this this blog). Now it is the turn of NICE to betray its own principles.
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) describes its job thus
&amp;#8220;NICE is an independent organisation responsible for providing national guidance on promoting good health and preventing and treating ill health.&amp;#8221;

Its Guidance document on Low Back Pain will be published on Wednesday 27 May 2009, but the newspapers have already started to comment, presumably on the assumption that it will have changed little from the Draft Guidance of September 2008. These comments may have to be changed as soon as the final version becomes available.
The draft guidance, though mostly sensible, has two re...</description>
            <author>DC's Improbable Science</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2441450</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:24:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2441450</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>And then they came for me</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2113757&amp;cid=t_166649_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D832</link>
            <description>One of the most extraordinary bits of journalism I&amp;#8217;ve read for a long time appeared as an editorial in the Sri Lankan newspaper, the Sunday Leader, on Sunday January 11th 2009   It was reproduced in the Guardian on  13th January, and in The Times.  It was written by Lasantha Wickrematunge, editor of the [...] (Source: DC's goodscience)</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2113757</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:58:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2113757</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Oh, my aching back!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1981393&amp;cid=t_166649_129_f&amp;fid=36038&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.healthtalk.com%2Fmultiple-sclerosis%2Flife-with-ms%2Foh-my-aching-back%2F</link>
            <description>So, I expect that I am not the only person living with MS who is developing back issues. Today, we’re going to talk about that. Maybe it was all of you women talking about cute, high heels which got me thinking about this.
Ever since diagnosis in 2001, my left side had been my weak side. Sometimes you wouldn’t know it; we all compensate. In fact, I think sometimes about FDR. He would be buckled and braced and use inertia to move his fractured body and wobble one side then the other to a podium like a stiff-legged, wooden cowboy; throwing his weight from one side to another.
I’m not that bad, but I do know that after years of compensation, my back is toast!
I use good over-the-counter orthotic inserts in my shoes and that helps (though they don’t fit in my slippers which I am forced...</description>
            <author>Life with MS</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1981393</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:02:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1981393</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Chiropractors resort to legal intimidation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1689336&amp;cid=t_166649_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D245</link>
            <description>An editorial in today&amp;#8217;s issue of the New Zealand Medical Journal prints in full a letter sent to the Journal by Paul Radich, a lawyer who acts for the New Zealand Chiropractors&amp;#8217; Association Inc and its members. The letter alleges defamation by Andrew Gilbey&amp;#8217;s articla, and by my editorial which sets the wider context [...] (Source: DC's goodscience)</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1689336</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:28:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1689336</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Doctor Who?    Deception by chiropractors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1655851&amp;cid=t_166649_90_f&amp;fid=36413&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdcscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D241</link>
            <description>The article below is an editorial that I was asked to write for the New Zealand Medical Journal, as a comment on article in today&amp;#8217;s edition about the misuse of the title &amp;#8216;doctor&amp;#8217; by chiropractors. Titles are not the only form of deception used by chiropractors, so the article looks at some of [...] (Source: DC's goodscience)</description>
            <author>DC's goodscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1655851</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:00:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1655851</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Top 3 Thoughtful Reads Today plus an Overdue Rant</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1325122&amp;cid=t_166649_145_f&amp;fid=35710&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fstoryofhealing.com%2F2008%2F03%2F25%2Ftop-3-thoughtful-reads-today-plus-an-overdue-rant%2F</link>
            <description>1. Panda Bear, M.D.&amp;#8217;s Defending the Pie. A clarifying thought on medical quackery, &amp;#8220;dis-ease&amp;#8221;, and what one should be conscious of as a potential patient.
Sure, anybody can see somebody with a cold or some other minor complaint and the odds are good that nothing they do, provided they don’t get too jiggy with it, will do much harm. But let’s suppose that you have never rotated on a medical service or done your share of critical care. Suppose you have never worked in an emergency department or spent a few sloppy months on the labor and delivery floor. Imagine, if you can, seeing a provider for your family’s medical care who is treating your kids but has never had a lick of formal pediatric training or so little that she has never seen the really bad pediatric disease...</description>
            <author>the story of healing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1325122</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:16:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1325122</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Chiropractic Adjustments and Artery Dissection: Is Your Neck in Safe Hands?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1183260&amp;cid=t_166649_107_f&amp;fid=36585&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FHighlightHealth%2F%7E3%2F224603496%2F</link>
            <description>This article was published on Highlight HEALTH.          Related articlesUpdated Rates of the Most Common Neurological Disorders (Source: Highlight HEALTH)</description>
            <author>Highlight HEALTH</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1183260</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:44:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1183260</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

