<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: coburn</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'coburn'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22coburn%22&t=%22coburn%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:32:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Washington Post Asks for Budget Plans</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5139695&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FOehssZVSty8%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenThe Washington Post’s editorial board issued a challenge to the president and his Republican opponents: “show us your plans” for deficit reduction. In fact, the Post says it would be “delighted” to receive plans from its readers. However, the Post isn’t interested in “meaningless promises” to cut “waste, fraud, and abuse”—it wants specifics:
Here’s what we’re not looking for: pablum about eliminating unnecessary spending without identifying where. Gauzy rhetoric about making hard choices without making them. Meaningless promises about eliminating waste, fraud and abuse. Broad assertions about where to find the money — “Medicare savings,” “tax reform” — without specifics. Arbitrary spending caps without accompanying details about how those...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5139695</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:16:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5139695</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Budget Plans: Gang of Six and Senator Coburn</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5050529&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F01Hsa0pm0OM%2F</link>
            <description>The “Gang of Six” senators has released an outline of budget reforms that would supposedly reduce deficits by $3.7 trillion over 10 years. Revenues would rise by at least $1 trillion, while spending would be theoretically trimmed by various procedural mechanisms. The plan promises to “strengthen the safety net,” “maintain investments,” and “maintain the basic structure” of Medicare and Medicaid, which doesn’t sound very reform-minded to me.
The Gang of Six plan is a grander version of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s recent debt-limit proposal, which was aimed at putting off any spending cuts. The Gang outline has a few specific cuts, but the document mainly consists of promises to restrain spending and raise taxes in the future.
I’m surprised that Sen. Tom Coburn supports the ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5050529</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:24:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5050529</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Will Obama Comply with the War Powers Resolution?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4841427&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fku2dMnrIqz8%2F</link>
            <description>By Christopher PrebleSix Republican senators are challenging President Obama&amp;#8217;s authority to conduct an open-ended war in Libya without congressional authorization. The six conservative lawmakers (Rand Paul (R-KY), Jim DeMint (R-SC), Mike Lee (R-UT), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Tom Coburn (R-OK), and John Cornyn (R-TX)) sent a letter to the president on May 18th asking if he intends to comply with the War Powers Resolution. The full text of the letter can be found here.
The law stipulates that the president must terminate military operations within 60 days, unless Congress explicitly authorizes the action, or grants an extension. The clock on the Libya operation started ticking on March 19, 2011. Congress has neither formally approved of the mission, nor has it granted an extension. The...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4841427</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 20:49:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4841427</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4789224&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F_T6uSP5kDhU%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellAs I have explained elsewhere, tax increases are a bad idea &amp;#8211; unless you favor bigger government.
And I&amp;#8217;ve already added my two cents to the tax debate between Senator Coburn and Grover Norquist regarding the desirability of higher taxes.
So it won&amp;#8217;t surprise anyone to know that I fully agree with this new video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity, which offers seven reasons why higher taxes are a bad idea.

The video is narrated by Piyali Bhattacharya of Young Americans for Liberty, and here are her seven reasons.

Tax increases are not needed
Tax increases encourage more spending
Tax increases harm economic performance
Tax increases foment social discord
Tax increases almost never raise as much revenue as projected
Tax increases encourage mor...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4789224</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:58:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4789224</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Norquist Is Right, Coburn Is Wrong: Tax Increases Undermine Good Fiscal Policy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4575045&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FhYxQkYpDKeg%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel J. MitchellThere's a significant debate now taking place in Washington — largely behind closed doors, but sometimes covered by the media — on whether fiscal conservatives should maintain a rigid no-tax-increase position. One side of the debate features Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform, which is the organization that maintains the no-tax-increase pledge. The other side features Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who is part of a small group of GOP senators who might be willing to increase the tax burden as part of a deal that supposedly reduces deficits.
I'm a huge fan of Senator Coburn, who was in favor of cutting wasteful spending before it became fashionable. His office, for instance, releases a &quot;Pork Report&quot; every couple of days. You shouldn't read it if you have hi...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4575045</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:28:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4575045</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Other For-Profit College Scandal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4549737&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FVNcSGn3W7Js%2F</link>
            <description>By Neal McCluskeyBecause the evidence of wrongdoing and evasion is so clear, and the effect has been so damaging, I have devoted a lot of pixels to the GAO's horrendous &quot;secret shopper&quot; report on for-profit colleges, as well as the stonewalling about what caused the initial report to be so biased. A potentially even bigger story, though, is what appears to be the machinations of an unholy alliance of Department of Education officials, Senate HELP Committee chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA), and Wall Street short-sellers hoping to make big bucks off the demise of for-profit schools. This Daily Caller article, and the connected video of Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK), are good places to start learning more about this, as is the website of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
The ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4549737</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:06:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4549737</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>GAO Report on Duplicative Programs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4536048&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FxbLj9Kr6Ttk%2F</link>
            <description>This report confirms what most Americans assume about their government. We are spending trillions of dollars every year and nobody knows what we are doing. The executive branch doesn’t know. The congressional branch doesn’t know. Nobody knows.
Nobody knows because no human being could possibly keep sufficient tabs on thousands of programs in a $3.8 trillion federal budget. Compounding the problem is the fact that policymakers devote much of their time to fundraising, campaigning, and other distracting activities.
The report’s takeaway, therefore, should be that the federal government’s scope needs to be drastically curtailed. Unfortunately, a typical response to the report has been to cite it as further evidence that policymakers must “eliminate waste” and “make governmen...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4536048</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:54:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4536048</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Abolish Federal Job Training Programs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4455248&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FKPwpojpQFvo%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenA report from the Government Accountability Office finds that the federal government administers 47 different employment and job training programs at a cost to taxpayers of about $18 billion. The GAO excluded another 51 programs that could be considered as providing job training assistance, such as student loan subsidies.
The takeaway from the report is that there is a lot of duplication, and thus excess bureaucracy and inefficiencies. Moreover, the GAO says that “little is known about the effectiveness of most programs.” Nonetheless, Congress unflinchingly funds these programs even though the GAO has been issuing reports with similar findings since the 1990s.
Coinciding with the GAO report, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) released a paper that singles out 25 particularly egregiou...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4455248</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:27:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4455248</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obsession with Senate “Holds” Is Misguided</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4318308&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FDTY4LtxaeHY%2F</link>
            <description>By Mark A. CalabriaWith the start of the 112th Congress, Senate Democrats have offered a set of rule changes, most of which are geared toward the filibuster.  Some of these changes, such as guaranteeing the minority at least three amendments, make a great deal of sense.  I&amp;#8217;ve long thought that the practice of the Majority Leader (of any party) &amp;#8220;filling the amendment tree&amp;#8221; did not make for good legislating.  And I say that, recalling as a former Senate staffer, the practice made my life easier on numerous occasions.
One part of the package, however, that of ending &amp;#8220;secret&amp;#8221; holds strikes me as rather uninformed as to actual Senate practice.  First let&amp;#8217;s recall that a &amp;#8220;hold&amp;#8217; is essentially a method for Senators to tell the Majority Leader th...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4318308</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:44:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4318308</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Getting Beyond the Anti-Earmark Crusade</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4298614&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F2Em8Cq_NXMM%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenAs a former advisor to one of Congress’s most ardent foes of earmarking, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), I’ve served time on the front-lines of the battle to end the corruptive practice. Yet, I never felt quite comfortable about the mission. At the same time I was assisting the senator in his floor battles against the likes of ex-Sen. Ted Stevens (Porker-AK), some of my other colleagues had been instructed to help Oklahomans get “their fair share” of subsidies from various federal grant programs.
There just isn’t much difference between the activities funded via earmarking and the activities funded by standard bureaucratic processes. The means are different, but the ends are typically the same: federal taxpayers paying for parochial benefits that are properly the domain of ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4298614</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:31:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4298614</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A First Test for Republicans</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4155228&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F8bi5Y7IawoE%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperRepublicans&amp;#8217; hands have been strengthened by a wave of voter angst about big-spending and business-as-usual in Washington, D.C. But have they landed on their limited-government feet? The first test of that question comes next Tuesday.
That&amp;#8217;s when Senate Republicans will likely vote on a proposal to bar themselves from requesting earmarks. Last year, House Republicans adopted that policy for themselves the day after House Democrats limited their earmarking to non-profits and government bodies.
The Senate Republican earmark ban is championed by Tea Party favorite Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.). Its strongest opponent is Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Senator McConnell may have won his race in 2008 thanks to bringing home the bacon, but politics seem to have chang...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4155228</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:43:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4155228</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Halloween: Uncle Sam Style</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4118879&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F88enVGMvFms%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenThe Office of Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) has released an appropriately timed report on federal subsidies that have gone to the deceased. From the introduction:
In the past decade, Washington sent over $1 billion of your tax dollars to dead people. Washington paid for dead people’s prescriptions and wheelchairs, subsidized their farms, helped pay their rent, and even chipped in for their heating and air conditioning bills.
In some cases, these payments quietly gather in a dormant bank account. In many others, however, they land in the pockets of still-living people, who are defrauding the system by collecting benefits meant for a now-deceased relative.
Since 2000, the known cost of these payments to over 250,000 deceased individuals has topped $1 billion, according to a revie...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4118879</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:05:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4118879</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Co-opting the Anti-Spenders</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3780346&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FB2VG-E_w870%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenVoters who recognize the need to make major cuts to federal spending and think returning Republicans to power will accomplish this feat could be in for a big disappointment. Recent comments to the Washington Post made by former Senate majority leader Trent Lott (R-MS) make it clear that anti-spending candidates elected in November will be fighting against their own party &amp;#8212; not just the Democrats.
From the article:
Former Senate majority leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.), now a D.C. lobbyist, warned that a robust bloc of rabble-rousers spells further Senate dysfunction. “We don&amp;#8217;t need a lot of Jim DeMint disciples,” Lott said in an interview. “As soon as they get here, we need to co-opt them.”
Lott actually provided one of the more memorable moments in my career ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3780346</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:12:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3780346</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Emergency Spending</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3757850&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fg0Zva-ruO1Q%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenA recent paper by Veronique de Rugy examines how policymakers use various budgeting gimmicks to increase spending and obscure liabilities. One particularly abusive mechanism is the designation of supplemental spending as an “emergency.” The emergency designation makes it easier for policymakers to skirt budgetary rules, particularly “pay-as-you-go” (PAYGO) requirements.
The following chart from the paper shows how supplemental spending, most of which was designated as “emergency,” has taken off in the last decade:

As the chart notes, much of the increase is attributable to supplemental appropriations for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Bush administration was rightly criticized by analysts across the ideological spectrum for funding the wars outside of the ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3757850</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:59:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3757850</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Is a ‘Strong’ Defense?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3753806&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F2DOL3wUwygM%2F</link>
            <description>By Christopher PrebleThe good people at the Stimson Center&amp;#8217;s Budget Insight blog invited me to contribute a guest post discussing the Sustainable Defense Task Force report  Debt, Deficits, &amp; Defense: A Way Forward. Here&amp;#8217;s an excerpt:
The most common response [to the report] has been some sympathy for our argument that military spending should be subjected to the same scrutiny that should be applied to other government spending. There are still a fair number of people, however, who share our concern about the deficit, but who counter “But I want a strong defense.”
Who doesn’t?
The task force report was written with a single consideration in mind: in what ways, and where, could we make cuts in military spending that would not undermine U.S. security?
[...]
A leading c...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3753806</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:33:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3753806</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On the C Street Where You Live</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3460364&amp;cid=t_316391_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2010%2F04%2F11%2Fon-the-c-street-where-you-live%2F</link>
            <description>New cartoon by Trussell &amp; Trussell on AOL’s Politics Daily. On the C Street Where You Live.
Filed under: Politics Daily Tagged: bart stupak, c street, chaos theory, jeff sharlet, john ensign, lobbyist, political cartoon, sam brownback, the family, tom coburn (Source: Donna Trussell)</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3460364</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:37:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3460364</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How To Make Better Choices</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3331649&amp;cid=t_316391_180_f&amp;fid=38612&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fpickthebrain%2FLYVv%2F%7E3%2FxhpJNw-Cmwo%2F</link>
            <description>I was a touring comedian for ten years and a very successful one at that; in fact, I hold the entertainment industry record of 106-straight weeks touring on the road. At the same time, I managed to retain my anonymity, which was important to me. In those ten years touring, I met tens of thousands of audience members after shows. The most common opening phrase they used? &amp;#8220;I wish I could . . .&amp;#8221; followed by their goal or dream that they just didn&amp;#8217;t know how to go about achieving. In small towns, it was often just &amp;#8220;I wish I could move to a big city where I could have some options.&amp;#8221; (Small town people often feel trapped and because of it often become so.)
I found myself uttering the same phrase back in college at nineteen. Mine was, “I wish I knew how to figure o...</description>
            <author>PickTheBrain | Motivation and Self Improvement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3331649</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:22:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3331649</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Coburn Report on Stimulus Silliness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3071140&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FooxD-uSgAnM%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenSenator Tom Coburn&amp;#8217;s (R-OK) office has released a new report documenting 100 examples of questionable stimulus spending. From a public policy perspective, it&amp;#8217;s a tidy illustration of why the government doesn&amp;#8217;t do a very good job of spending other people&amp;#8217;s money. In terms of entertainment value, it&amp;#8217;s a pretty amusing read in a sad sort of way. Although, I do have one question for the Coburn staffers who included the story of a cruise company receiving a million dollars in anti-terrorism funds: Did you not see Speed 2?! (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3071140</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:29:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3071140</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Frozen Minds on the Medicare Part B Premium Freeze</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2879391&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FtFbCt2kUWlc%2F</link>
            <description>This week, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) blocked an attempt by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) to move — without a recorded vote or CBO score – H.R. 3631, legislation to freeze Medicare Part B premiums. These premiums are automatically deducted from the Social Security checks of seniors, almost all of whom are enrolled in the Medicare Part B (Supplemental Medical Insurance) program.
Social Security recipients will not receive a COLA increase in their monthly checks beginning January 2010 because inflation between October 2008 and September 2009 was negative. But if Part B premiums increase, the dollar amount of their Social Security checks will decrease beginning in January 2010.
What would happen if the Part B premium were frozen for 2010? Seniors would get a double benefit. First they are gaining fr...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2879391</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:35:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2879391</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Congressional Priorities and the FY2010 Budget Resolution</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2380725&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FKYjFx7RRtMI%2F</link>
            <description>Yesterday the House and Senate passed a bloated $3.5 trillion budget blueprint for fiscal year 2010.  According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), &amp;#8220;What is important to us as a nation is reflected in this budget. It&amp;#8217;s a very happy day for our country.&amp;#8221;
Included in the blueprint is language that calls for an equal pay raise between military employees and civilian federal employees.  President Obama had originally proposed slightly higher pay for members of the armed services.  The exact pay raise for bureaucrats will be determined in the appropriations process, but it&amp;#8217;s likely to be a hike of anywhere from 2.9% to 3.9%.  This would come on top of last year&amp;#8217;s 3.9% raise.
Omitted from the blueprint was language included in the Senate version by Sen. Tom Co...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2380725</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:17:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2380725</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Republicans and Earmarks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2249703&amp;cid=t_316391_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fm4qZragGUB4%2F</link>
            <description>This week, a handful of fiscally conservative Republican senators have been trying to cut earmarks out of the $410 billion omnibus appropriations bill. According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, the legislation contains 8,570 earmarks worth $7.7 billion.
Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) has sought to strike specific items, like the $200,000 earmark for Tattoo Removal Violence Prevention Outreach Program in Burbank, California and the $1.9 million earmark to the Pleasure Beach Water Taxi Service in Connecticut.
Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has taken a broader approach by introducing an amendment to strike all earmarks from the bill and revert to last year’s spending levels.
Not surprisingly, they have been unsuccessful. And given recent events, one must wonder if these efforts by fiscal conservative...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2249703</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:47:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2249703</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Congress Criticizes FDA Over HRT Ingredient</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1429313&amp;cid=t_316391_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F286189674%2F</link>
            <description>A bi-partisan group of Congressional reps have introduced a resolution* criticizing the FDA for its recent move to warn compounders about their use of estriol in their bioidentical versions of hormone replacement treatments. 
Last January, the agency questioned the safety and effectiveness of BHRT products, citing unsupported medical evidence, and false and misleading claims. The agency accused seven compounders of claiming their products are superior to FDA-­approved menopausal hormone therapy drugs and prevent or treat such diseases as Alzheimer’s, stroke, and various forms of cancer, according to the FDA.
And last month, US Senator Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma, wrote a letter to FDA commish Andy von Eschenbach seeking agency data on actual adverse events and and to demand t...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1429313</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:36:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1429313</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Barack Obama Watch: Why Wasn’t William Ayers Prosecuted?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1393688&amp;cid=t_316391_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fflapsblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D6815</link>
            <description>William Ayers, Tom Coburn and Barack Obama
Remember that Barack Obama compared Weather Underground Bomber William Ayers to Senator Tom Coburn. Now, questions are arising why Ayers and his radical bomber wife, Bernardine Dohrn were never prosecuted for their crimes (via Hugh Hewitt).
Answer: Deep Throat AKA FBI Agent Mark Felt
If everyone knows that William Ayers and his comrades in the Weather Underground were planning to set bombs to murder innocent people, why didn’t they do time?
Because the investigation against them was muffed thanks to the illegal activities of the Washington Post’s favorite Watergate answer man himself, Mark Felt — aka Deep Throat.
In 1972-73, FBI official Felt and his colleague Edward S. Miller authorized nine illegal break-ins at the homes of Weather Undergr...</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1393688</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:57:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1393688</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hillary Clinton Up By 11 Points on Eve of Pennsylvania Primary?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1388912&amp;cid=t_316391_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fflapsblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D6802</link>
            <description>US Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) takes the stage after her husband, former President Bill Clinton (L), to address a crowd of supporters in Market Square in downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on April 21, 2008.
Matt Drudge had the poop earlier in the day that Hillary is up big in Pennsylvania.
Controlled excitement is building inside of Clinton&amp;#8217;s inner circle as closely guarded internal polling shows the former first lady with an 11-point lead in Pennsylvania!
Clinton is polling near to nearly 2 to 1 over Obama in many regions of the state, a top insider explained to the DRUDGE REPORT.
A strong coalition of middle-class and religious voters has all but secured a Clinton victory Tuesday, with headline-making margins, the campaign believes.
&amp;#8220;It&amp;#8217;s not a matter of if, it&amp;#8217...</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1388912</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:51:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1388912</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Barack Obama Watch: Comparing Bill Ayers and Tom Coburn</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1379351&amp;cid=t_316391_125_f&amp;fid=34819&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fflapsblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D6783</link>
            <description>Bill Ayers, Tom Coburn and Barack Obama
Did Barack Obama REALLY compare Weather Underground bomber Bill Ayers and Oklahoma United States Senator Tom Coburn?
Yes, he did&amp;#8230;&amp;#8230;.. (Source: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog)</description>
            <author>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1379351</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:26:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1379351</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

