<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: cognitive science</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'cognitive science'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22cognitive+science%22&t=%22cognitive+science%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:08:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>The Critical Thinking Coach: Interview with Stephen Haggerty, Part 2</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096345&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F08%2F02%2Fthe-critical-thinking-coach-interview-with-stephen-haggerty-part-2%2F</link>
            <description>This is part 2 of an interview with Stephen Haggerty (read part 1 here), a Critical Thinking Teacher of the Year award winner at Eastern Kentucky University.
Does one need to be highly intelligent to be a good critical thinker?
Highly intelligent…what does that mean?  Does that term imply book intelligence? Street smarts?  I would argue anyone could engage in higher-level thinking if they are trained in the terminology and how to apply it.
It takes a lot of practice to be a critical and creative thinker who communicates effectively, but I do believe if one is dedicated to being more successful in life, then they can learn to apply the principles of critical and creative thinking through effective communication.

It seems some critical thinking advocates view critical thinking as nothin...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096345</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:10:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096345</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>&quot;Why Neuroscience Matters&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4968694&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36506&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FBrainSciencePodcastBlog%2F%7E3%2FXjSCPI9gHS0%2Fwhy-neuroscience-matters.html</link>
            <description>On May 11, 2011 Ginger Campbell, MD gave a talk entitled &quot;Why Neuroscience Matters&quot; at the London Skeptics in the Pub. Episode 42 of Books and Ideas is an edited version of that talk, including the lively Q and A with the audience.
 Listen to Episode 42 of Books and Ideas
Free Episode Transcript (Download PDF)
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Subscribe to Books and Ideas Podcast:   &amp;nbsp;
References&amp;nbsp;

Bayes, A., Grant, S., et al. &quot;Characterization of the proteome, diseases and evolution of the human postsynaptic density.&quot;&amp;nbsp;Nature Neuroscience 14, 19&amp;ndash;21 (2011) (Published online 12/23/2010).
Libet, B. &quot;Do We Have Free Will?&quot; Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6. No. 8-9, 1999, pp. 47-57.
On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not (2008) by Robert Burton; p 127.
Philosophy in t...</description>
            <author>the Brain Science Podcast and Blog with Dr. Ginger Campbell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4968694</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:00:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4968694</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Frustrated by Devices? Read the Manual</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4968582&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F06%2F23%2Ffrustrated-by-devices-read-the-manual%2F</link>
            <description>Handsome, well-made tools are a joy to use; confusing devices are a drain. So often, I find, things once easy to operate &amp;#8212; TVs, irons, dishwashers, alarm clocks, washing machines &amp;#8212; are now humiliatingly challenging.
Cognitive-science professor Donald Norman points out that when we expect a device &amp;#8212; like a toaster or video camera &amp;#8212; will be fairly simple to operate, and it’s not, we assume we’re at fault, instead of holding the object responsible. One Sunday afternoon, when I was frantically trying to synchronize the data on my laptop with my desktop, I kept getting strange error messages. In desperation, I asked my husband to take a look. “Oh. Our internet service isn’t working,” he announced after fifteen seconds on the computer. I’d assumed I was doing ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4968582</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:22:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4968582</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Myths about Rationality</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4848003&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F05%2F20%2Fmyths-about-rationality%2F</link>
            <description>Rationality has been a popular topic of discussion for many years.  There is a huge body of literature, popular and scholarly, that addresses rational thinking skills.  It seems as if everyone has an opinion on rationality.  Rationality is often misunderstood, and the word loses its importance when it is defined in terms so broad or ambiguous that it can mean virtually anything.  This confusion has contributed to myths concerning rationality.
In a recent interview I asked cognitive scientist Keith Stanovich:
What are the two most common myths about rationality? I am aware there are more than a few, but if you were limited to discussing two, what would they be and how do we combat these erroneous thoughts?

Here is Dr. Stanovich&amp;#8217;s answer:
I discuss many of these in all my books, ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4848003</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:33:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4848003</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Embodied Cognition with Lawrence Shapiro (BSP 73)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4636555&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36506&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FBrainSciencePodcastBlog%2F%7E3%2F2MrgmzutFLQ%2Fembodied-cognition-with-lawrence-shapiro-bsp-73.html</link>
            <description>Discussion)
Brooks, R. (1991) &quot;New Approaches to Robotics,&quot; Science 253: 1227-32.
Brooks, R. (1991) &quot;Intelligence without Representation,&quot; Artificial Intelligence 47: 139-59.
Clark, A. and Chalmer, D. (1998) &quot;The Extended Mind.&quot; Analysis 58: 7-19.
Glenberg, A. and Kaschak, M. (2002) &quot;Grounding Lanquage in Action,&quot; Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review 9: 558-65.
Ehrlich, S., Levine, S., and Golden-Meadows, S. (2006) &quot;The Importance of Gesture in Children's Spatial Reasoning,&quot; Developmental Psychology 42: 1259-68.
Thelan, E. and Smith,L. (1994) A Dynamical Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action (Cambridge: MIT Press)
See Episode Transcript for additional references.

&amp;nbsp;Subscribe to the Brain Science Podcast:  
Annoucements:
&amp;nbsp;

Join the discussion of this episode in...</description>
            <author>the Brain Science Podcast and Blog with Dr. Ginger Campbell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4636555</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:00:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4636555</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Are We Rational Animals? Part 2</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4470451&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F02%2F12%2Fare-we-rational-animals-part-2%2F</link>
            <description>This is the second in a two-part discussion about human rationality. Click to read Part 1, Are We Rational Animals?.
Intelligence as a predictor of rationality
Some may be surprised to learn that high levels of intelligence do not necessarily indicate high levels of rationality.  In fact, some people may rank high in intelligence while low in rationality.  There is more to sound thinking than intelligence.
Below is a list of rational thinking tasks and their association with cognitive ability/intelligence from Stanovich (2010, p.221).
Tasks that fail to show associations with cognitive ability 

Noncausal base-rate usage (Stanovich &amp; West, 1998c, 1999, 2008)
Conjunction fallacy between subjects (Stanovich &amp; West, 2008)
Framing between subjects (Stanovich &amp; West, 2008)
Anchori...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4470451</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:44:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4470451</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>I’m a Skeptic, Not a Cynic</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4450332&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F02%2F08%2Fim-a-skeptic-not-a-cynic%2F</link>
            <description>“Jamie why are you so skeptical?”
“Why do you have such a negative view of the world?”
“You are so cynical.”
I hear comments and questions such as these on a regular basis.  My answers to these questions:
It is not a bad thing to be skeptical.
I am not cynical (at least not most of the time).
What is a skeptic?
Some people believe that skepticism is the rejection of new ideas. Often people confuse “skeptic” with “cynic.” Skeptic is derived from the Greek skeptikos, which means, &amp;#8220;inquiring&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;to look around.&amp;#8221; The skeptic requires evidence before claims are accepted as fact (fact, not in layman terms, but fact as tentative). It is important to consider who&amp;#8217;s making the claim, but no matter who it may be, evidence is required.

The person...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4450332</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:36:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4450332</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cognitive Atlas</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4419283&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2011%2F01%2F31%2Fcognitive-atlas%2F</link>
            <description>, a machine-readable ontology and semantic database of assertions about cognitive studies, with bibliographic links and brain area localization. (Source: neurodudes)</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4419283</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 01:52:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4419283</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Critical Thinking: What is True and What to Do</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4338023&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F01%2F12%2Fcritical-thinking-what-is-true-and-what-to-do%2F</link>
            <description>Many researchers suggest that a key characteristic of critical thinking is the ability to recognize one’s own fallibility when evaluating and generating evidence &amp;#8212; recognizing the danger of weighing evidence according to one’s own beliefs.  The expanding literature on informal reasoning emphasizes the importance of detaching one’s own beliefs from the process of argument evaluation (Kuhn, 2007; Stanovich &amp; Stanovich, 2010).
The emphasis placed on unbiased reasoning processes has led researchers to highlight the importance of decontextualized reasoning.  For example (Stanovich &amp; Stanovich, 2010, p. 196):
Kelley (1990) argues that &amp;#8220;the ability to step back from our train of thought . . . . is a virtue because it is the only way to check the results of our thinking...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4338023</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:24:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4338023</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Average is Beautiful: A test of Attractiveness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4302190&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2FY4Cf0l5FmIA%2F</link>
            <description>Think we all have different tastes where beauty is concerned? Well, cognitive psychology shows us that an average face (made from several other faces) is almost always judged as more attractive than its constituent faces… Why? It may be for the simple reason that an average face is closer to the mental idea we have of a prototypical face and thus easier for the brain to process.
Want to experience it? Follow this link to the the Face Research Lab and create your own average faces. Enjoy.
Happy stimulating New Year to you! (Source: SharpBrains)</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4302190</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:32:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4302190</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Celebrating 4 Years of the Brain Science Podcast (BSP 71)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4281398&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36506&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FBrainSciencePodcastBlog%2F%7E3%2F7ey3Ju7TBKk%2Fcelebrating-4-years-of-the-brain-science-podcast-bsp-71.html</link>
            <description>Discussion Forum: 
Join our Facebook Fan Page: 
Send me feedback at gincampbell at mac dot com or leave voice mail at 205-202-0663.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;



&amp;nbsp; (Source: the Brain Science Podcast and Blog with Dr. Ginger Campbell)</description>
            <author>the Brain Science Podcast and Blog with Dr. Ginger Campbell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4281398</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:08:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4281398</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How pairs of humans combine uncertain information</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4098202&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F10%2F20%2Fhow-pairs-of-humans-combine-uncertain-information%2F</link>
            <description>Imagine there are two referees who have different opinions about where a ball landed, in particular whether it went over some line. How can they cooperate to make a better decision than either one could individually?

We could flip a coin to decide which ref to believe. But this merely gives us a decision performance which is the average of the decision performance of each individual ref. So this is no good.
We could figure out which ref is better and then always believe that ref whenever the two refs disagree. But in that case the second ref isn&amp;#8217;t contributing anything, so we may as well just have one ref.
However, if the two refs have some estimate of their uncertainty, then we can do better. If d1 represents where ref one thinks the ball landed, and d2 represents what ref 2 thinks...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4098202</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:34:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4098202</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How pair of humans combine uncertain information</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4086389&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F10%2F20%2Fhow-pair-of-humans-combine-uncertain-information%2F</link>
            <description>Imagine there are two referees who have different opinions about where a ball landed, in particular whether it went over some line. How can they cooperate to make a better decision than either one could individually?

We could flip a coin to decide which ref to believe. But this merely gives us a decision performance which is the average of the decision performance of each individual ref. So this is no good.
We could figure out which ref is better and then always believe that ref whenever the two refs disagree. But in that case the second ref isn&amp;#8217;t contributing anything, so we may as well just have one ref.
However, if the two refs have some estimate of their uncertainty, then we can do better. If d1 represents where ref one thinks the ball landed, and d2 represents what ref 2 thinks...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4086389</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:34:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4086389</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Tononi is wrong</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4003005&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F09%2F26%2Fwhy-tononi-is-wrong%2F</link>
            <description>In a recent NY Times article, Tononi chooses to propose a rather sketchily-described “Shannon informational” model to supplant a gamma synchrony model partly on these grounds; 
“Dr. Tononi sees serious problems in these models. When people lose consciousness from epileptic seizures, for instance, their brain waves become more synchronized. If synchronization were the key to consciousness, you would expect the seizures to make people hyperconscious instead of unconscious, he said. “
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/21/science/21consciousness.html?_r=1

Jouny et al (2010) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19910249 surely should have suggested that this is premature closure, with an INCREASE in signal complexity – that is, decline in synchrony – associated with seizure
Our study of...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4003005</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:40:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4003005</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NYT article on study habits research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3946585&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F09%2F06%2Fnyt-article-on-study-habits-research%2F</link>
            <description>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/health/views/07mind.html
Basically, all of the following improve recall:


spacing out study time over a longer period of time
alternating between multiple topics in one study session
studying the same thing in different locations
taking a test

In summary, recalling and using knowledge in a variety of contexts helps you remember it. (Source: neurodudes)</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3946585</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:26:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3946585</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NYT article on study habits resea</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3938419&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F09%2F06%2Fnyt-article-on-study-habits-research%2F</link>
            <description>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/07/health/views/07mind.html
Basically, all of the following improve recall:


spacing out study time over a longer period of time
alternating between multiple topics in one study session
studying the same thing in different locations
taking a test

In summary, recalling and using knowledge in a variety of contexts helps you remember it. (Source: neurodudes)</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3938419</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:26:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3938419</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Re-examining neurosexism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3933170&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F09%2F03%2Fre-examining-neurosexism%2F</link>
            <description>My dad brought this interesting book review to my attention: Peeling Away Theories on Gender and the Brain (NYT)
In her book Delusions of Gender (which I have not read though am intrigued to do so), cognitive neuroscientist Cordelia Fine places several modern studies of early differences in brain anatomy/function into a long line of sexist explanations for supposed differences in male and female behaviors.
The basic argument is that there has been no convincing connection made between any measured structural differences (which she argues might not exist) to behavioral differences. Just another case of correlation (maybe) and not causation.
Here&amp;#8217;s a description of study that you might already be familiar with and Fine&amp;#8217;s take on it:
Dr. Baron-Cohen’s lab conducted research on ...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3933170</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:22:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3933170</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The evolutionary psychology of war</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3569964&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F05%2F16%2Fthe-evolutionary-psychology-of-war%2F</link>
            <description>Nothing too shocking here for students of evolutionary psychology but it&amp;#8217;s always interesting to see real world examples of how our shared behavior. There is a new book by Sebastian Junger called War, in which he recounts how men do not fight for larger ideological goals (eg. &amp;#8220;a safer Iraq&amp;#8221;, &amp;#8220;finding Bin Laden&amp;#8221;) but instead they can overcome fears because &amp;#8220;they&amp;#8217;re more concerned about their brothers than what happens to themselves individually&amp;#8221;. Here&amp;#8217;s Junger on Good Morning America:

After the jump some more from Junger and a nice talk from Robert Sapolsky about similar behaviors in chimps.

Another example from soldiers in Afghanistan is the &amp;#8220;blood-in, blood-out&amp;#8221; ritual for increasing group cohesiveness and testing individ...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3569964</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 20:29:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3569964</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Moral Life of Babies – NYTimes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3549447&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F05%2F10%2Fthe-moral-life-of-babies-nytimes%2F</link>
            <description>The Moral Life of Babies &amp;#8211; NYTimes.com.
Paul Bloom talks about research on the morality of small children, and ways in which their morality is similar to and different from adults. Concise descriptions of supporting experiments is given throughout.
Basically, babies prefer nice people over mean people, but prefer people who punish mean people over people who reward mean people. But babies are not impartial; for example, they give favorable treatment to other babies who are wearing the same tee-shirt as themselves.
Also has some content about the cognition of babies in general. Experiments show that, at various young ages, &amp;#8220;..babies think of objects largely as adults do, as connected masses that move as units, that are solid and subject to gravity and that move in continuous pat...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3549447</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 07:13:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3549447</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mirror neurons reemerge</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3463759&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.discovermagazine.com%2Fgnxp%2F2010%2F04%2Fmirror-neurons-reemerge%2F</link>
            <description>A few years ago I was hearing a lot about mirror neurons. There was a hyped up article on The Edge website about them, MIRROR NEURONS and imitation learning as the driving force behind &amp;#8220;the great leap forward&amp;#8221; in human evolution. But I haven&amp;#8217;t heard much since then, though I&amp;#8217;m not neuro nerd so perhaps I&amp;#8217;m out of the loop. So I pass on this link with interest, Single-Neuron Responses in Humans during Execution and Observation of Actions:
Direct recordings in monkeys have demonstrated that neurons in frontal and parietal areas discharge during execution and perception of actions&amp;#8230;Because these discharges “reflect” the perceptual aspects of actions of others onto the motor repertoire of the perceiver, these cells have been called mirror neurons. Their o...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3463759</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:52:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3463759</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>We be symbolic</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3378661&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2FtfNGj26XUGE%2Fwe_be_symbolic.php</link>
            <description>The Evolution Of Symbolic Language by Terrence Deacon and Ursula Goodenough. Deacon's The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain is a book I liked a great deal, though in hindsight I don't think I had the background to appreciate it in any depth (nor do I now). Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3378661</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:25:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3378661</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Over time, distribution of shot lengths in movies has moved closer to pink noise</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3322508&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2010%2F03%2F02%2Fover-time-distribution-of-shot-lengths-in-movies-has-moved-closer-to-pink-noise%2F</link>
            <description>The statistics of shot durations in 150 films from 1935 to 2005 were analyzed. From about 1970 to the present, the power spectrum of shot durations in individual films has tended to become more like pink noise (power ~= 1/f). Also, autocorrelation shows that the lengths of nearby shots has become more and more correlated.

The authors, Cutting, DeLong, and Nothelfer, speculate that the pink noise bit is being driven by some process that is related to attention, since there are some other results (which they cite) showing the relevance of pink noise to attention.
However, IMDB ratings were not positively correlated with the pink-noise-ness of the movie (partial correlation with release date factored out).
Incidentally, this guy did his PhD thesis on cognitive science explanations for film e...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3322508</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:12:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3322508</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Anthropology as a dog side-effect skill</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3311866&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2FkZ67VSatIWY%2Fanthropology_as_a_dog_side-eff.php</link>
            <description>Social Cognition in Dogs, or How did Fido get so smart?. This you know:
Domesticated dogs seem to have an uncanny ability to understand human communicative gestures. If you point to something the dog zeroes in on the object or location you're pointing to (whether it's a toy, or food, or to get his in-need-of-a-bath butt off your damn bed and back onto his damn bed). Put another way, if your attention is on something, or if your attention is directed to somewhere, dogs seem to be able to turn their attention onto that thing or location as well.

Amazingly, dogs seem to be better at this than primates (including our nearest cousins, the chimpanzees) and better than their nearest cousins, wild wolves.

But there are two explanations for how/why dogs are better than primates at this task:
And ...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3311866</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:36:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3311866</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Face recognition is highly heritable</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3307019&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2FyErWmdwuTQw%2Fface_recognition_is_highly_her.php</link>
            <description>Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable:
Compared with notable successes in the genetics of basic sensory transduction, progress on the genetics of higher level perception and cognition has been limited. We propose that investigating specific cognitive abilities with well-defined neural substrates, such as face recognition, may yield additional insights. In a twin study of face recognition, we found that the correlation of scores between monozygotic twins (0.70) was more than double the dizygotic twin correlation (0.29), evidence for a high genetic contribution to face recognition ability. Low correlations between face recognition scores and visual and verbal recognition scores indicate that both face recognition ability itself and its genetic basis are largely attr...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3307019</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:42:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3307019</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The New York Times on Amy Bishop</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3291974&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2FSom_FZSZb_M%2Fthe_new_york_times_on_amy_bish.php</link>
            <description>Covers all the major angles. Nice that there's a newspaper which can support this sort of reporting (on the other hand). Not surprising that Amy Bishop seems to have some history of delusions of grandeur, she's claiming that both she and her husband have an I.Q. of 180. That's 5.3 standard deviations above the mean. Assuming a normal distribution that's a 1 in 20 million probability. Of course the tails of the distribution are fatter beyond 2 standard deviations than expectation for I.Q., but at these really high levels (above 160) I'm skeptical that most tests are measuring anything real. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3291974</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:20:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3291974</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Most people are not stupid (?)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2879734&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2FVPWGugEBuB4%2Fmost_people_are_not_stupid.php</link>
            <description>More Singularity stuff. I'm Not Saying People Are Stupid, says Eliezer Yudkowsky in response to my summary of his talk. The last line of his post says: &quot;I'm here because I'm crazy,&quot; says the patient, &quot;not because I'm stupid.&quot; So the issue is craziness, not stupidity in Eliezer's reading. The problem I would say is that stupid people have the &quot;Not Even Crazy&quot; problem. They often can't get beyond their basic cognitive biases because they don't have a good grasp of a rational toolkit, nor are they comfortable and fluent in analysis and abstraction. I can grant that many smart people are wrong or crazy, but at least there's a hope of having them internalize Bayes' rule. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2879734</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:07:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2879734</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>George Lakoff on the Metaphorical Situation of Moral Politics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2855655&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F10%2F02%2Fgeorge-lakoff-on-the-metaphorical-situation-of-moral-politics%2F</link>
            <description>From University of California Television: &amp;#8220;UC Berkeley professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics George Lakoff explores how successful political debates are framed by using language targeted to people&amp;#8217;s values instead of their support for specific government programs in this public lecture sponsored by the Helen Edison Series at UC San Diego.&amp;#8221;
* * *

* * *
For a sample of related Situationist posts, see &amp;#8220;The Situation of Metaphors,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;Ideology Shaping Situation, or Vice Versa?,&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;Your Brain on Politics.&amp;#8221; (Source: The Situationist)</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2855655</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:01:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2855655</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brain Fitness at New York Public Library, next week</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2807739&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F6hiu_s-gcV8%2F</link>
            <description>Title: The SharpBrains Guide to Brain Fitness - Practical Advice to Keep Your Brain Sharp 
- Two community-based book talks hosted by New York Public Library and supported by the Einstein Aging Study at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
Description: A fit brain? Can you exercise your brain and become mentally fit? Can you continue to learn and increase your brain’s capacity at any age? Alvaro Fernandez, CEO and Co-Founder of SharpBrains, says Yes!, and in this program he will show you how. Based on research compiled from leading scientists in fields of Neuroscience, Gerontology, and Cognitive Science, and presented in his book “The SharpBrains Guide to Brain Fitness”, Alvaro Fernandez will provide ways to maintain and improve your cognitive health.
He will:
- Debunk 10 Myths of Br...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2807739</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:08:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2807739</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The right-handed ape</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2800608&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34994&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnxp.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F09%2Fright-handed-ape.php</link>
            <description>Via Anthropology.net, The prehistory of handedness: Archaeological data and comparative ethology:Homo sapiens sapiens displays a species wide lateralised hand preference, with 85% of individuals in all populations being right-handed for most manual actions. In contrast, no other great ape species shows such strong and consistent population level biases, indicating that extremes of both direction and strength of manual laterality (i.e., species-wide right-handedness) may have emerged after divergence from the last common ancestor. To reconstruct the hand use patterns of early hominins, laterality is assessed in prehistoric artefacts. Group right side biases are well established from the Neanderthals onward, while patchy evidence from older fossils and artefacts indicates a preponderance of ...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2800608</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2800608</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Babies can understand meaning behind dog barks?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2626201&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2FArkdXksc_GA%2Fbabies_can_understand_meaning.php</link>
            <description>We know that dogs can read human faces, it turns out that babies can infer the meaning of different dog barks:
 New research shows babies have a handle on the meaning of different dog barks - despite little or no previous exposure to dogs.

Infants just 6 months old can match the sounds of an angry snarl and a friendly yap to photos of dogs displaying threatening and welcoming body language. (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2626201</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:01:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2626201</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Good to the bone; adducing honesty via imaging</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2598414&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2Fljq6MvgprlY%2Fgood_to_the_bone_adducing_hone.php</link>
            <description>Randall Parker points me to a new paper from Joshua Greene which describes the neurological responses of individuals when do, or don't, lie, when lying might be in their self-interest. From EurekaAlert:
The research was designed to test two theories about the nature of honesty - the &quot;Will&quot; theory, in which honesty results from the active resistance of temptation, and the &quot;Grace&quot; theory in which honesty is a product of lack of temptation. The results of this study suggest that the &quot;Grace&quot; theory is true, because the honest participants did not show any additional neural activity when telling the truth.
...
Using fMRI, Greene found that the honest individuals displayed little to no additional brain activity when reporting their prediction of the coin toss. However, the dishonest participants...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2598414</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:14:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2598414</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Empathy &amp; neurobiology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2512352&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2FSTDL2od259g%2Fempathy_neurobiology.php</link>
            <description>Related to yesterday's post,The neural bases of empathic accuracy:
Theories of empathy suggest that an accurate understanding of another's emotions should depend on affective, motor, and/or higher cognitive brain regions, but until recently no experimental method has been available to directly test these possibilities. Here, we present a functional imaging paradigm that allowed us to address this issue. We found that empathically accurate, as compared with inaccurate, judgments depended on (i) structures within the human mirror neuron system thought to be involved in shared sensorimotor representations, and (ii) regions implicated in mental state attribution, the superior temporal sulcus and medial prefrontal cortex. These data demostrate that activity in these 2 sets of brain regions trac...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2512352</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:13:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2512352</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Give it up for science</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2452907&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2009%2F06%2F04%2Fgive-it-up-for-science%2F</link>
            <description>No, not that.
Neurodudes reader Deanna Saunders from the Sloman lab at Brown wants survey participants for a brief cognitive psychology survey. I took it and I must say it was kind of fun. She tells me that it&amp;#8217;s about the effects of decision making on learning. (I&amp;#8217;ve got to say I always appreciate the surveys that give you a little debriefing after the survey explaining some of the stimuli and the intended effects. Sadly, this survey doesn&amp;#8217;t seem to have that.) Here it is for those of you with a few extra minutes for science: Click here for the survey. Better than the Colbert bump is the Neurodudes bump! (Source: neurodudes)</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2452907</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:11:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2452907</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Longitudinal study on happiness and success</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2452908&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2009%2F06%2F04%2Flongitudinal-study-on-happiness-and-success%2F</link>
            <description>The Atlantic&amp;#8217;s Joshua Shenk has a fascinating story about a long-running study, started in the 1930s (!), that attempts to discern what makes people happy in life. The study has collected extensive data on subjects over a 70 year period. I couldn&amp;#8217;t stop reading the article&amp;#8230; what an amazing dataset. But, before I say more about that, here is Shenk&amp;#8217;s synopsis of a single case file (ie. actual data) from the study:

Case No. 158
An attractive, amiable boy from a working-class background, you struck the study staff as happy, stable, and sociable. “My general impression is that this boy will be normal and well-adjusted—rather dynamic and positive,” the psychiatrist reported.
After college, you got an advanced degree and began to climb the rungs in your profession. ...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2452908</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:56:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2452908</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brain gene expression differences as a function of time</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2295396&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34994&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnxp.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F03%2Fbrain-gene-expression-differences-as.php</link>
            <description>Transcriptional neoteny in the human brain:In development, timing is of the utmost importance, and the timing of developmental processes often changes as organisms evolve. In human evolution, developmental retardation, or neoteny, has been proposed as a possible mechanism that contributed to the rise of many human-specific features, including an increase in brain size and the emergence of human-specific cognitive traits. We analyzed mRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex of humans, chimpanzees, and rhesus macaques to determine whether human-specific neotenic changes are present at the gene expression level. We show that the brain transcriptome is dramatically remodeled during postnatal development and that developmental changes in the human brain are indeed delayed relative to other prim...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2295396</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:52:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2295396</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Social neuroscience fMRI: Specious correlations?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2112204&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2009%2F01%2F17%2Fsocial-neuroscience-fmri-specious-correlations%2F</link>
            <description>Nature is reporting on potential flaw in multiple imaging (fMRI) studies of social neuroscience. Ed Vul (a graduate student in my dept) and colleagues have a paper in press that says that many of the high correlations between brain regions and social behavior are implausible, given the inherent variability/noise in fMRI. Furthermore, based on a survey of methods from individual investigators, they created a list of papers that commit, in their view, a statistical mistake (non-independence). Naturally, the authors named in the paper aren&amp;#8217;t happy and, according to the Nature article, several rebuttals are in the works. At the very least, to my non-expert eyes, this seems like an important discussion to have about data analysis and methodology. (Source: neurodudes)</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2112204</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:02:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2112204</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cognitive News November-December 2008</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2079027&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F495728856%2F</link>
            <description>This article provides is a very good market overview. The reporter and I also discussed in depth the need for better consumer education and professional development, so people can make informed decisions, and for cognitive assessments to serve as independent baseline, help identify priorities and measure results. Please note that our market estimates do include revenues of computerized cognitive assessments, today mostly used in clinical trials, and wthin the military and sports teams.
2) Navigating the brain fitness landscape: do's and don'ts (McKnight's Long Term Care News)
Comment: &amp;quot;Choosing the right cognitive fitness product or program for senior living residents is harder than it sounds. But understanding residents' needs, identifying your objectives and considering the total c...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2079027</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:03:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2079027</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cognitive science to improve student learning</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2006970&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F473213588%2F</link>
            <description>Today's news:
McDonnell Foundation grant harnesses cognitive science to improve student learning (press release)
- &amp;quot;Using what cognitive psychologists are discovering in the laboratory to improve learning in the classroom is the goal of a $6.47 million collaborative activity grant to Washington University from the James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF).&amp;quot;
- &amp;quot;The aim of the grant is to take the knowledge that cognitive psychologists have gained about learning and memory from laboratory experimentation and to develop techniques to improve learning in the classrooms,&amp;quot; said Henry L. &amp;quot;Roddy&amp;quot; Roediger III, Ph.D., principal investigator on the grant and the James S. McDonnell Distinguished University Professor in Arts &amp;#038; Sciences.
Comment: this is great news, but it...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2006970</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:30:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2006970</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Moral Grammar and Intuitive Jurisprudence - Abstract</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1933484&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F11%2F05%2Fmoral-grammar-and-intuitive-jurisprudence-abstract%2F</link>
            <description>John Mikhail&amp;#8217;s recently posted his forthcoming chapter, &amp;#8220;Moral Grammar and Intuitive Jurisprudence: A Formal Model of Unconscious Moral and Legal Knowledge&amp;#8221; (forthcoming in The Psychology of Learning and Motiation: Moral Cognition and Decision Making (D. Medin, L. Skitka, C. W. Bauman, D. Bartels, eds., 2009) on SSRN.  Here&amp;#8217;s the abstract.

* * *
Could a computer be programmed to make moral judgments about cases of intentional harm and unreasonable risk that match those judgments people already make intuitively? If the human moral sense is an unconscious computational mechanism of some sort, as many cognitive scientists have suggested, then the answer should be yes. So too if the search for reflective equilibrium is a sound enterprise, since achieving this state of...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1933484</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:01:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1933484</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Some people better language learners?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1908829&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34994&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnxp.com%2Fblog%2F2008%2F10%2Fsome-people-better-language-learners.php</link>
            <description>Well, I assume most people probably accept that some people are better than average at learning languages, while others are not as good. But the reasons for this aren't quite clear. PNAS has a paper out on this topic, Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language. I find the ScienceDaily summary comprehensible, and one of the researchers says:&quot;Therefore, these results show that there is a positive correlation between specific speech discrimination abilities and the ability to learn a second language, which means that the individual ability to distinguish the specific phonemes of the language, both in the case of the mother tongue and in the case of other languages, is, without a doubt, a decisive fa...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1908829</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:23:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1908829</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Training Attention and Emotional Self-Regulation - Interview with Michael Posner</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1889209&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F424916302%2F</link>
            <description>Michael I. Posner is a prominent scientist in the field of cognitive neuroscience. He is currently an emeritus professor of neuroscience at the University of Oregon (Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences). In August 2008, the International Union of Psychological Science made him the first recipient of the Dogan Prize &amp;quot;in recognition of a contribution that represents a major advance in psychology by a scholar or team of scholars of high international reputation.&amp;quot;
Dr. Posner, many thanks for your time today. I really enjoyed the James Arthur Lecture monograph on Evolution and Development of Self-Regulation that you delivered last year. Could you provide a summary of the research you presented?
I would emphasize that we human beings can regulate our ...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1889209</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:28:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1889209</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1841017&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2008%2F09%2F30%2Flog-or-linear-distinct-intuitions-of-the-number-scale%2F</link>
            <description>Stanislas Dehaene, Véronique Izard, Elizabeth Spelke, and Pierre Pica. Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 320(5880):1217&amp;#8211;1220, May 2008.
The Mundurucu are an indigenous culture whose language does not contain exact words for numbers above 5. Dehaene, Izard, Spelke, and Pica basically gave subjects an empty horizontal line and then gave them a bunch of numbers and told them to place the numbers where they belong on the line (the line was not entirely empty; the left and right hand sides were labeled with a small number and a big number). 
Western adults tend to place the numbers linearly, whereas the Mundurucu tend to place them logarithmically. Western children also place them logarithmically, and even Western ...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1841017</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:26:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1841017</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Yorker article on number sense</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1841018&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2008%2F09%2F30%2Fnew-yorker-article-on-number-sense%2F</link>
            <description>From March. Actually, the topic of the article is Dehaene, but it talks about some studies too. Excerpts after the break, interspersed with hyperlinks to citations that I looked up.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/03/03/080303fa_fact_holt?currentPage=all

&amp;#8230;Mr. N, had sustained a brain hemorrhage that left him with an enormous lesion in the rear half of his left hemisphere. He suffered from severe handicaps: his right arm was in a sling; he couldn’t read; and his speech was painfully slow. He had once been married, with two daughters, but was now incapable of leading an independent life and lived with his elderly parents. Dehaene had been invited to see him because his impairments included severe acalculia, a general term for any one of several deficits in number processing....</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1841018</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:06:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1841018</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Training Young Brains to Behave</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1826755&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F400952839%2F</link>
            <description>Great article in the New York Times titled Training Young Brains to Behave. A couple of quotes:
- &amp;quot;But just as biology shapes behavior, so behavior can accelerate biology. And a small group of educational and cognitive scientists now say that mental exercises of a certain kind can teach children to become more self-possessed at earlier ages, reducing stress levels at home and improving their experience in school. Researchers can test this ability, which they call executive function, and they say it is more strongly associated with school success than I.Q.&amp;quot;
- “We know that the prefrontal cortex is not fully developed until the 20s, and some people will ask, ‘Why are you trying to improve prefrontal abilities when the biological substrate is not there yet?’ ” said Adele Di...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1826755</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:45:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1826755</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Steven Pinker interview</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1535800&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2F316524706%2Fsteven_pinker_interview.php</link>
            <description>Steven Pinker: The evolutionary man.  Also check out the GNXP interview with Pinker from 2 years ago. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1535800</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1535800</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Situationism of the Late Charles Tilly</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1419169&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F05%2F04%2Fthe-situationism-of-the-late-charles-tilly%2F</link>
            <description>Wikipedia on Charles Tilly:
Examining political, social, and technological change in Europe from the Middle Ages to the present, Tilly attempted to explain the the unprecedented success of the nation-state as the dominant polity on Earth. According to his theory, military innovation in pre-modern Europe (especially gunpowder and mass armies) made war extremely expensive. As a result, only states with a sufficient amount of capital and a large population could afford paying for their security and ultimately survive in the hostile environment. Institutions of the modern state (such as taxes) were created to allow war-making.
Another focus of Tilly&amp;#8217;s work is the area of contentious politics. In opposition to individualistic, dispositional analyses of contentious politics, his work empha...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1419169</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:01:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1419169</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Moral Psychology on Blogging Heads</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1336244&amp;cid=t_100957_109_f&amp;fid=34759&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fmixingmemory%2F%7E3%2F260404107%2Fmoral_psychology_on_blogging_h.php</link>
            <description>You can see Josh Knobe, of Experimental Philosophy fame, and Paul Bloom, who doesn't have a blog but has one of them professorship things up at some podunk little school in New Haven, CT, talking about research in moral psychology here. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Mixing Memory)</description>
            <author>Mixing Memory</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1336244</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:07:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1336244</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A moral instinct?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1146439&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2F215402931%2Fa_moral_instinct.php</link>
            <description>Steven Pinker has a new essay in The New York Times Magazine, The Moral Instinct. Chris of Mixing Memory is critical of Pinker when he goes outside of his specialization in the psychology of language...but I did enjoy the ending:
Far from debunking morality, then, the science of the moral sense can advance it, by allowing us to see through the illusions that evolution and culture have saddled us with and to focus on goals we can share and defend. As Anton Chekhov wrote, &quot;Man will become better when you show him what he is like.&quot; 

Knowledge is power. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1146439</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:43:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1146439</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Learning &amp; The Brain: Interview with Robert Sylwester</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1132270&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F212264461%2F</link>
            <description>Dr. Robert Sylwester is an educator of educators, having received multiple awards during his long career as a master communicator of the implications of brain science research for education and learning. He is the author of several books and many journal articles, and member of our Scientific Advisory Board. His most recent book is The Adolescent Brain: Reaching for Autonomy (Corwin Press, 2007). He is an Emeritus Professor of Education at the University of Oregon.
I am honored to interview him today.
Alvaro Fernandez: Let's start with that eternal source of debate. What do we know about the respective roles of genes and our environment in brain development? 
Robert Sylwester: Genetic and environmental factors both contribute to brain maturation. Genetics probably play a stronger role in...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1132270</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:41:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1132270</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Levels of analysis</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=952108&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F10%2F15%2Flevels-of-analysis%2F</link>
            <description>Salon features an interview today with Steve Pinker and Rebecca Goldstein:
	Proud atheists: Steven Pinker, Rebecca Goldstein interview | Salon Books
	After reiterating the physicalist view of the mind, the article ends with this quote from Pinker (reminiscent of Marr&amp;#8217;s levels of analysis):
	
[&amp;#8230;] But just by looking at the brain itself, will you ever be able to understand the creative mind?
	PINKER: I suspect not. In fact, the reason I&amp;#8217;m not a neurobiologist but a cognitive psychologist is that I think looking at brain tissue is often the wrong level of analysis. You have to look at a higher level of organization. For the same reason that a movie critic doesn&amp;#8217;t focus a magnifying glass on the little microscopic pits in a DVD, even though a movie is nothing but a patt...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=952108</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:44:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">952108</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Steven Pinker &amp; Rebecca Goldstein</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=952146&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2F170140597%2Fsteven_pinker_rebecca_goldstei.php</link>
            <description>Salon has a must read interview of Steven Pinker &amp; Rebecca Goldstein. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=952146</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:16:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">952146</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>F**k you!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=936854&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2F167276947%2Ffk_you.php</link>
            <description>Steven Pinker on why we curse. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=936854</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:05:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">936854</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>POSTDOCTORAL POSITION in NONLINEAR DYNAMICS of MEMORY and ACTIVE PERCEPTION</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=914090&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F09%2F29%2Fpostdoctoral-position-in-nonlinear-dynamics-of-memory-and-active-perception%2F</link>
            <description>POSTDOCTORAL RESEARCH in
	NONLINEAR DYNAMICS of MEMORY and ACTIVE PERCEPTION
	Biologically Inspired Neural &amp;#038; Dynamical Systems (BINDS) Laboratory
University of Massachusetts Amherst
	The postdoc work will be concentrating on:
	How memories are modified, what other systems take part of it, how can the system benefit from changing memories?
These questions are asked from the functional and computational view, and will be tackled using theories of dynamical systems, knowledge of neurobiology and memory system, mathematical analysis and control. The modeling created will then be transferred into crisp principles and from there to machine learning, detection, and navigation.
	The successful candidate will have a Ph.D. in Computer Science, Cognitive Science, Psychology, Engineering or a rel...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=914090</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:22:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">914090</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Your Brain Is A Cartographer</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=865477&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F09%2F11%2Fyour-brain-is-a-cartographer%2F</link>
            <description>The concept that the brain holds maps of the surface of the body in the primary sensory and motor cortex is a fascinating but well known fact to the field of neuroscience since the early work of Wilder Penfield. What is less broadly appreciated is the concept of &amp;#8220;peripersonal space&amp;#8221;. A new book by Sandra and Matthew Blakeslee describes peripersonal space in the following way:
	The maps that encode your physical body are connected directly, immediately, personally to a map of every point in that space and also map out your potential to perform actions in that space. Your self does not end where your flesh ends, but suffuses and blends with the world, including other beings. [&amp;#8230;] Your brain also faithfully maps the space beyond your body when you enter it using tools. Take h...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=865477</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">865477</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Company Using “In Silico Embodiment” To Build Artificial Intelligence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=819523&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F08%2F24%2Fcompany-using-in-silico-embodiment-to-build-artificial-intelligence%2F</link>
            <description>If there&amp;#8217;s one lesson to be learned from almost 60 years of AI research its almost certainly to be skeptical of anyone who says they have found THE ANSWER to producing human level intelligence from computers. Even in the face of this, however, I am intrigued by a new company&amp;#8217;s approach to developing Artifical General Intelligence (AGI), a term which is meant to indicate Strong AI rather than Weak AI. That&amp;#8217;s probably because its founder, Ben Goertzel, manages to skillfully walk the tightrope between staying conservative about how much they realistically accomplish and still managing to inspire hope that their methodology has the potential to get close to AGI. 
	
	This is best demonstrated in a recent talk that Goertzel gave at Google on his approach to AGI. His company, No...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=819523</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:06:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">819523</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Severe lifelong case of hydrocephalus but IQ of 75</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=791322&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F08%2F10%2Fsevere-lifelong-case-of-hydrocephalus-but-iq-of-75-2%2F</link>
            <description>The man had a normal job and is a married father of two children. 
	Nature news
	Lionel Feuillet, Henry Dufour and Jean Pelletier. Brain of a white-collar worker. The Lancet, Volume 370, Issue 9583, 21 July 2007-27 July 2007, Page 262. (Source: neurodudes)</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=791322</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:46:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">791322</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pinkerpalooza</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=765684&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=34736&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fchanneln.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F07%2Fpinkerpalooza.html</link>
            <description>[Paris Hilton, photo by Daniel C. Dennett]title The Cognitive Nichedescription Via Pinkerfest! at Jaime Diskin's blog. The extensive Freethought Media Steve Pinker multimedia archive includes this lecture on the Cognitive Niche from the Second World Conference on the Future of Science: Evolution (video archives).producer Edgefeaturing Steve Pinkerformat  wmvdate  23/09/06length  00: 33:37link  http://www.reitstoen.com/pinker.phpdirect video link  mms://media.tin.it/users/matrix/sapere/futuroscienza/23092006/adsl/02_eng_23_09_2006.wmvTags: webcast brain psychology evolution cog sci cognitive science (Source: Channel N)</description>
            <author>Channel N</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=765684</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:52:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">765684</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Variation as the ultimate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=716620&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2F130868320%2Fvariation_as_the_ultimate.php</link>
            <description>Many of you have heard of the Ultimatum Game:
The ultimatum game is an experimental economics game in which two parties interact anonymously and only once, so reciprocation is not an issue. The first player proposes how to divide a sum of money with the second party. If the second player rejects this division, neither gets anything. If the second accepts, the first gets his demand and the second gets the rest.

In theory a &quot;rational&quot; player should accept whatever is offered when there isn't a repeated iteration. Reality is different. From The Economist:
...Those results recorded, Dr Burnham took saliva samples from all the students and compared the testosterone levels assessed from those samples with decisions made in the one-round game.

As he describes in the Proceedings of the Royal Soc...</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=716620</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:54:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">716620</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Decreased demands on ACC and PFC reveal the benefits of forgetting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=713130&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F07%2F03%2Fdecreased-demands-on-acc-and-pfc-reveal-the-benefits-of-forgetting%2F</link>
            <description>This study provides fMRI evidence that, after forgetting some memories, the brain has to work less hard.
	
	Brice A Kuhl, Nicole M Dudukovic, Itamar Kahn and Anthony D Wagner. Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting. Nature Neuroscience - 10, 908 - 914 (2007)
	Pop sci article.
	Subjects memorized some cue-associate word pairs (i.e. a query word, and a response that they are supposed to give when asked that particular query). Each cue had multiple alternative associates (i.e. each query word had several alternative responses). We call alternative associates for the same cue &amp;#8220;competing memories&amp;#8221;.
	Then, subjects practiced retrieving only some of the associates for the cues (I&amp;#8217;ll call those the &amp;#8220;selected associates&amp;#82...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=713130</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 02:27:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">713130</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cognitive dysfunction in young subjects who have a gene for frontotemporal dementia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=547451&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F04%2F16%2Fcognitive-dysfunction-in-young-subjects-who-have-a-gene-for-frontotemporal-dementia%2F</link>
            <description>This isn&amp;#8217;t news but is rather an interesting thing I learned today. There is a family with an inherited form of frontotemporal dementia. In this family, the onset of dementia occurred between 57-63 years of age. A study was done which did psychological tests on members of this family. It was found that young people (younger than 35) who carried the gene for the disorder had measurable frontal-executive dysfunction (whereas controls, young people in the same family who did not carry the gene, did not have dysfunction).
	
Specifically, 
	
&amp;#8220;Carriers had significantly lower scores than noncarriers on verbal fluency, WCST categories completed, Stroop interference, and the WAIS-R similarities subtest. Performance results on the digit span subtest of the WAIS-R test and Trails B were ...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=547451</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:37:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">547451</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Alien abduction, reincarnation &amp; memory errors</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=536990&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35077&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurophilosophy.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F04%2F11%2Falien-abduction-reincarnation-memory-errors%2F</link>
            <description>We rarely remember things as they actually happened. Rather, as memories are encoded, they are altered in order to be made compatible with our existing knowledge; upon retrieval, memories are reconstructed rather than reproduced. Because the extent to which this reconstruction occurs can vary, some memories are very accurate while others are a mixture of [...] (Source: Neurophilosophy)</description>
            <author>Neurophilosophy</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=536990</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:54:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">536990</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cognitive neuroscience &amp; god</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=523147&amp;cid=t_100957_131_f&amp;fid=34995&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fscienceblogs%2Fgnxp%2F%7E3%2F106904826%2Fcognitive_neuroscience_god.php</link>
            <description>You know you've hit the big time when you are on CNN. Kind of like Anna Nicole. Read the comments on this post... (Source: Gene Expression)</description>
            <author>Gene Expression</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=523147</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:38:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">523147</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How the brain limits our ability to multitask</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=511505&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35077&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurophilosophy.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F03%2F30%2Fhow-the-brain-limits-our-ability-to-multitask%2F</link>
            <description>Multitasking refers to the simultaneous performance of two or more tasks, switching back and forth between different tasks, or performing a number of different tasks in quick succession. consists of two complementary stages: goal-shifting, in which one decides to divert their attention from one task to another, and rule activation, by which the instructions [...] (Source: Neurophilosophy)</description>
            <author>Neurophilosophy</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=511505</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:41:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">511505</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>PFC lesion can change your ethical philosophy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=490050&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F03%2F21%2Fpfc-lesion-can-make-you-an-ethical-utilitarian%2F</link>
            <description>A set of 6 subjects with bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPC) answered ethical questions in a way more consistent with utilitarian ethical philosophy than the control subjects. For example, they would be more willing to kill someone by pushing them off a bridge if that would save 5 other people. This supports the view that social emotions underly ethical judgments.
	Michael Koenigs, Liane Young, Ralph Adolphs, Daniel Tranel, Fiery Cushman, Marc Hauser and Antonio Damasio.Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature. Published online 21 March 2007
	
	Utilitarianism in a nutshell
	Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy where, rather than classifying types of actions into good or evil, you look at the consequences of an action in a g...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=490050</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:55:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">490050</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Most exciting discovery or theory of the past ten years</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=475521&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=34756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrainethics.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fmost-exiting-dscovery-or-theory-of-the-past-ten-years%2F</link>
            <description>I am a sucker for lists, so please bear with me: In a forthcoming editorial, Shbana Rahman, the editor of the great journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences, is celebrating the ten years anniversary of TICS by printing short reflections on what has been the most &amp;#8220;exciting discovery or theory of the past ten years&amp;#8221; by a number of fat cats in the cognitive neurosciences: John Anderson, Nick Chater, Jon Driver, Jerry Fodor, Marc Hauser, Phil Johnson-Laird, Steven Kosslyn, Jay McClelland, George A. Miller, Lynn Nadel, Steven Pinker, Zenon Pylyshyn, Trevor Robbins, and Vincent Walsh. Naturally, there are as many different answers as people asked: the shift from computational models to probalistic models (Chater), Gergely and Csibra&amp;#8217;s experiments on rational imitation in infants (H...</description>
            <author>BRAINETHICS</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=475521</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:42:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">475521</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Most exiting discovery or theory of the past ten years</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=471487&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=34756&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrainethics.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F03%2F14%2Fmost-exiting-dscovery-or-theory-of-the-past-ten-years%2F</link>
            <description>I am a sucker for lists, so please bear with me: In a forthcoming editorial, Shbana Rahman, the editor of the great journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences, is celebrating the ten years anniversary of TICS by printing short reflections on what has been the most &amp;#8220;exiting discovery or theory of the past ten years&amp;#8221; by a number of fat cats in the cognitive neurosciences: John Anderson, Nick Chater, Jon Driver, Jerry Fodor, Marc Hauser, Phil Johnson-Laird, Steven Kosslyn, Jay McClelland, George A. Miller, Lynn Nadel, Steven Pinker, Zenon Pylyshyn, Trevor Robbins, and Vincent Walsh. Naturally, there are as many different answers as people asked: the shift from computational models to probalistic models (Chater), Gergely and Csibra&amp;#8217;s experiments on rational imitation in infants (Ha...</description>
            <author>BRAINETHICS</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=471487</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:07:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">471487</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hawkins Releases Numenta Code</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=486193&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F03%2F05%2Fhawkins-releases-numenta-code%2F</link>
            <description>Entrepreneur-turned-cognitive neuroscientist Jeff Hawkins is distributing a &amp;#8220;research release&amp;#8221; of their experimental code base implementing his idea of hierarchical temporal memory described in his book, &amp;#8220;On Intelligence&amp;#8221;. Hawkins drew inspiration for the model from his own reading about the structure and function of the human neocortex and believes that it represents the foundation for developing intelligent machines.
	Jeff explains this surprising move to open source the code for the Numenta Platform for Intelligent Computing (NuPIC) on the Numenta web site:
	Why are we making NuPIC available now?
	We have been contacted by dozens of researchers and scientists who are excited about HTM and by our work at Numenta. These people are anxious to work on HTM, are willin...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=486193</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:57:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">486193</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More on “Quad Nets” (new brain/mind theory)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=486195&amp;cid=t_100957_122_f&amp;fid=35066&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fneurodudes.com%2F2007%2F02%2F24%2Fmore-on-quad-nets-new-brainmind-theory%2F</link>
            <description>In September, 2006, I described my &amp;#8220;new brain/mind theory&amp;#8221; here and received some challenging criticism from Eric Thomson and Mike S. (see below).  To meet these challenges, I prepared a reduced model discussed in a web page linked to a paper in .pdf form. Since my approach is based on little-known thermodynamics, I have also written about mechanical metaphors that may be helpful in explaining my ideas.
	
	&amp;#8220;Timing devices&amp;#8221; in the new paper are like RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computers) in comparison to Quad Nets that are like CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computers). &amp;#8220;Quad Nets&amp;#8221; is based on &amp;#8220;critical point thermodynamics&amp;#8221; and I am confident that they are new. However, &amp;#8220;timing devices&amp;#8221; may have been explored by others and I will...</description>
            <author>neurodudes</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=486195</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:43:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">486195</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

