<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: coordination</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'coordination'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22coordination%22&t=%22coordination%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:20:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Six Quick First Impressions of the CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative (BPCII)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5159299&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FWP26N28MUOk%2F</link>
            <description>This afternoon CMS announced the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative (BPCII). For details, start reading here.
Here are six quick first impressions:
1. It’s very creative and innovative. CMS has demonstrated out-of-the-box thinking and leaves a lot of room for applicants to propose their own approaches. Expect to have to read the materials 2-3 times to wrap your thinking around it.
Unlike the Medicare Shared Savings ACO rule, the BPCII is flexible.  Anticipate some innovative and non-traditional proposals from diverse applicants. Unlike the Medicare ACO Shared Savings rule, the BPCII invites flexibility in:

Definition of care bundles
Proposal of specific   financial terms
Participation by diverse care   providers (see below)
Risk adjustment of   beneficiaries

 (more&amp;#8230...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5159299</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:14:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5159299</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Core Cities Health Network Report: New Horizons and New Challenges</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5158854&amp;cid=t_113822_86_f&amp;fid=36669&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffadelibrary.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F23%2Fthe-core-cities-health-network-report-new-horizons-and-new-challenges%2F</link>
            <description>Scan or click to download &amp;#039;The Core Cities Health Network Report: New Horizons and New Challenges&amp;#039;
Title:  The Core Cities Health Network Report: New Horizons and New Challenges
The Skinny: Report from the Core Cities Health Network that identifies that understanding the commissioning task for securing healthcare for large city/urban areas will be essential for established (and yet to be established) GP commissioning consortia and new statutory Health and Wellbeing Partnership Boards. Building effective partnerships across agencies ensures that local health care strategies for city populations must be informed and driven by health improvement and the reduction of health inequalities.
Publisher: DH
Published: August 2011
Size: 35p.
Filed under: Ooops Missed Category! Tagged: Annu...</description>
            <author>Fade Library</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5158854</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:56:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5158854</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How-to Guide Improving Transitions from the Hospital to the Clinical Office Practice to Reduce Avoidable Rehospitalizations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5158856&amp;cid=t_113822_86_f&amp;fid=36669&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffadelibrary.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F23%2Fhow-to-guide-improving-transitions-from-the-hospital-to-the-clinical-office-practice-to-reduce-avoidable-rehospitalizations%2F</link>
            <description>Scan or click to download &amp;#039;How-to Guide: Improving Transitions from the Hospital to the Clinical Office Practice to Reduce Avoidable Rehospitalizations&amp;#039;
Title: How-to Guide Improving Transitions from the Hospital to the Clinical Office Practice to Reduce Avoidable Rehospitalizations
The Skinny: Guide from Institute for Health Improvement on avoiding avoidable rehospitalisations as a result of poor co-ordination of care settings. Avoiding this is a key step toward achieving broader delivery system transformation. Based on the healthcare system of the USA this guide is of use to those looking at primary care and community settings.
Publisher: Institute for Health Improvement
Published: August 2011
Filed under: Ooops Missed Category! Tagged: Clinical Governance, Collaboration, Coord...</description>
            <author>Fade Library</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5158856</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:53:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5158856</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Practice of Medicine: from Marcus Welby to ???</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5159301&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F6e23a3ZIUP8%2F</link>
            <description>by Jaan Sidorov MD, MHSA, FACP and Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA
Physicians face great uncertainty. According to a survey conducted by The Physicians Foundation, the great majority of physicians (89%) believe the traditional model of independent private practice is either &amp;#8220;on shaky ground&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;is a dinosaur soon to go extinct.&amp;#8221;
In the face of this uncertainty, many physicians are jumping to a conclusion that &amp;#8220;I have to sell my practice to the hospital.&amp;#8221; In this post of our series on The 100 Year Shift, we will examine physician practice.  We’ll show that the economic and clinical environment  is changing rapidly and that selling to the hospital is one option. However, it is not the only option. (more&amp;#8230;)

 Article Series - The 100 Year Shift? Strategic ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5159301</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:26:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5159301</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The future of cancer networks: Policy recommendations as a result of a joint seminar held at the Kings Fund</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5158860&amp;cid=t_113822_86_f&amp;fid=36669&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffadelibrary.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F22%2Fthe-future-of-cancer-networks-policy-recommendations-as-a-result-of-a-joint-seminar-held-at-the-kings-fund%2F</link>
            <description>Title: The future of cancer networks: Policy recommendations as a result of a joint seminar held at the Kings Fund


Scan or click to download &amp;#8216;The future of cancer networks: Policy recommendations as a result of a joint seminar held at the Kings Fund&amp;#8217;

The Skinny: Report that recommends:


Networks need to be strengthened by expanding and diversifying the mix of professionals involved, including primary care, community services, public health and social care


Patients need to be involved through the creation of structures that are internal to the network


A single clinical network (ie covering multiple clinical areas) is an option to meet the challenges posed by the current financial climate as it can generate efficiencies from sharing services and learning, and consistency ...</description>
            <author>Fade Library</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5158860</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:52:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5158860</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Can competition and integration co-exist in a reformed NHS?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5130658&amp;cid=t_113822_86_f&amp;fid=36669&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffadelibrary.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F15%2Fcan-competition-and-integration-co-exist-in-a-reformed-nhs%2F</link>
            <description>Scan or Click to go to King&amp;#039;s Fund website to download &amp;#039;Can competition and integration co-exist in a reformed NHS?&amp;#039;
Title: Can competition and integration co-exist in a reformed NHS?
The Skinny: King&amp;#8217;s Fund report that addresses the fundamental question of whether competition and integration can co-exist and considers the role that different bodies, especially the NHS Commissioning Board and Monitor, will play within a new system.
The NHS Commissioning Board and Monitor must:


develop bundled payment mechanisms so that commissioners can contract for packages of care from different providers


allow flexibility for local innovation – regulations and guidance from both are critical


access to specialist procurement support for clinical commissioning groups is vital ...</description>
            <author>Fade Library</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5130658</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:00:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5130658</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Early Attestation Results: Some Observations – Meaningful Use Monday</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5118748&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FjLM8hRYzQbY%2F</link>
            <description>Lynn Scheps is Vice President, Government Affairs at EHR vendor SRSsoft. In this role, Lynn has been a Voice of Physicians and SRSsoft users in Washington during the formulation of the meaningful use criteria. Lynn is currently working to assist SRSsoft users interested in showing meaningful use and receiving the EHR incentive money. Check out Lynn&amp;#8217;s previous Meaningful Use Monday posts.
At last week’s HIT Policy Committee meeting, Robert Tagalicod, (the new director of the Office of E-Health Standards &amp; Services), presented an analysis of the attestation experience to-date [See John's previous Meaningful Use Details post for the slides and report]. The results lend themselves to some interesting observations—admittedly preliminary findings, but revealing nonetheless: 

The ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5118748</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:58:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5118748</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Physician-Hospital Relationships: The Hospital Morphs from Revenue Center to Cost Center</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5050811&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FtS3SgTYmYeY%2F</link>
            <description>by Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA and Jaan Sidorov MD, MHSA, FACP 
 
In our introductory posting of this series, we noted that economic incentives previously aligning doctor-hospital interests were changing. This creates the potential for The 100 Year Shift – physicians awakening to possibilities for stronger partnerships with payers than with hospitals.
In this post, we will zero in on the changing economic position of hospitals and the effect this is having on physician-hospital relationships. We will examine the trend of hospital employment of physicians and point out challenges and tensions for the future. [This is a long post...so now might be the time to refill your coffee cup.] (more&amp;#8230;)

 Article Series - The 100 Year Shift? Strategic Realignment among Physicians, Hospitals and Payer...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5050811</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:28:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5050811</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Will Health Plans Continue to Buy Up Hospitals?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5050812&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2Fjm_ArodpnyU%2F</link>
            <description>I doubt it.
IMHO, the recent acquisition by Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield of West Penn Allegheny Health System (WPAHS) for $475 M is unique to local market conditions. It was done as a last resort and should not be taken as a signal that health plans are starting a hospital buying binge.
Why are hospitals unattractive investments for health plans:
 (more&amp;#8230;)


	Tags: acquisition, hospital (Source: e-CareManagement)</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5050812</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:00:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5050812</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Payment Transformation: From Volume to Value</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5008372&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FXIWnixTJ1Vs%2F</link>
            <description>by Jaan Sidorov MD, MHSA, FACP and Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA
In our introductory posting, we suggested that a huge shift is underway in the health care industry.  Decades of hospital-physician cooperation are not only eroding, we suggest this trend could accelerate.  Instead of a natural clinical and economic affinity with hospitals, we foresee the potential for physicians forming a new dyad with insurer-buyers.
In this post, we will examine what we and many other commentators view as inevitable: the demise of volume-based payment systems and how the drive for greater value will cause physicians and insurers re-examine their normally antagonistic relationship. (more&amp;#8230;)

 Article Series - The 100 Year Shift? Strategic Realignment among Physicians, Hospitals and PayersThe 100 Year Shift?...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5008372</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:42:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5008372</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The 100 Year Shift? Introduction and Overview</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5008373&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FIJUiE1aXZqA%2F</link>
            <description>by Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA and Jaan Sidorov MD, MHSA, FACP
Gazing at the horizon, we foresee the potential for a tectonic realignment among physicians, hospitals and payers. Here’s a quick visual representation:


This essay is the first of a seven part series. In this first post we will capsulize our vision of this potential 100 Year Shift, answer initial FAQs, and lay out the structure for the rest of the series.
The Lynchpin &amp;#8212; Changing Economic Incentives
In the past, physicians and hospitals have benefited from mutually supportive economic interests. (more&amp;#8230;)

 Article Series - The 100 Year Shift? Strategic Realignment among Physicians, Hospitals and PayersThe 100 Year Shift? Introduction and OverviewPayment Transformation: From Volume to Value Next in series
	Tags: 100 Yea...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5008373</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 17:26:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5008373</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Patient “Leakage”: Rethinking Two Field of Dreams Assumptions About ACOs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4975988&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FKNUpsAvSVXc%2F</link>
            <description>A study released last week by the Massachusetts Attorney General contains surprising data to challenge two commonly held ACO (accountable care organization) &amp;#8221;Field of Dreams&amp;#8221; assumptions. These assumptions relate to patient &amp;#8221;leakage&amp;#8221; — out-of-network patient care and referrals.
1) Hospital administrators assume that tighter physician-hospital integration (e.g., through employment of physicians) will result in &amp;#8221;captive referrals&amp;#8221; by physicians back to the mother-ship hospital.
2) Medicare administrators are assuming that Medicare Shared Savings ACOs will be able to coordinate patient care even without limitations on patients&amp;#8217; choice to go to providers outside of the ACO provider network.
Here&amp;#8217;s the data that challenges the validity of ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4975988</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:21:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4975988</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>BlogTalkRadio Interview — Is Hospital-Physician Alignment Sustainable?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4813411&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F5IW3FuYsJ64%2F</link>
            <description>Why have hospitals increasingly been buying physician practices?  Are these marriages based on true love or convenience? Will these marriages survive?
To address these questions, let&amp;#8217;s take the long view (50–100 years) and revisit 7 assumptions that have driven us to today&amp;#8217;s healthcare non-system:

Healthcare payment systems have rewarded piecemeal work.
Despite uneasiness, hospital-physician relationships have been cooperative.
Physicians can function effectively in small/medium size practices.
The healthcare mindset: built on control, not collaboration.
Barriers to sharing patient info and coordinating care are high.
The hospital has been the economic bedrock of the community.
Health plans are the bad guys.

For more details and discussion, tune in to tomorrow to Blog...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4813411</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 21:48:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4813411</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is Hospital-Physician Integration Sustainable?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4771226&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FHV4Xl_SaRVc%2F</link>
            <description>Reprinted courtesy of MCOL.


Perspectives on a Selected Key Topic |     April 2011/May 2011     |   Volume Three Issue Two



Will a material number of hospitals and their core medical staffs, that are relatively independent, evolve into highly integrated delivery systems during this decade, and why?

 
William J DeMarco MA, CMC

President and CEO, Pendulum HealthCare Development Corporation
The great momentum brought about by government and private payers demand for more accountability is unstoppable. Rapid consolidation of hospitals and consolidation of physicians by physician groups, hospitals and now insurers will shift referral patterns and consumer preference. 1 out of 4 hospitals will fall short of providing value and close or be absorbed within 10 years.
Physicians will ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4771226</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 01:17:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4771226</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Could Facebook Be Your Platform for Care Coordination?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4696719&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FC4I7Th9bops%2F</link>
            <description>My guess is you&amp;#8217;ve probably never asked yourself this question. A quick preview:

Technical barriers aren&amp;#8217;t the limiting factors to Facebook becoming a care coordination platform.
Facebook&amp;#8217;s company DNA won&amp;#8217;t play well in health care.
Could Facebook become the care coordination platform of the future? If not Facebook, then what?

1) Technical barriers aren&amp;#8217;t the limiting factors to Facebook as a care coordination platform.
Can you imagine Facebook as a care coordination platform? I don&amp;#8217;t think it&amp;#8217;s much of a stretch. Facebook already has 650 million people on its network with a myriad of tools that allow for one-to-one or group interactions.
What would it take to make Facebook a viable care coordination platform?

More servers to handle the volume ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4696719</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:13:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4696719</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ACO Roundtable on blogtalkradio: Friday, April 1</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4664298&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FsjGmiz2m08s%2F</link>
            <description>On Friday April 1st, 2011 (yes, &amp;lsquo;April Fools day&amp;rsquo;) at 4 PM Eastern and 1 PM Pacific 
ACO Watch: A Mid Week Review will host a special roundtable series on the &amp;lsquo;hot of the press&amp;rsquo; Notice of Proposed Rules&amp;rsquo; pertaining to the implementation of Accountable Care Organizations. For the published rule,&amp;nbsp;click here.
The&amp;nbsp;roundtable team will consist of Mark Browne, MD,&amp;nbsp;PYA, aka&amp;nbsp;@consultdoc, Vince Kuraitis,&amp;nbsp;e-Care Management blog, aka&amp;nbsp;@VinceKuraitis, and David Harlow, the&amp;nbsp;Harlow Group, LLC, &amp;nbsp;aka&amp;nbsp;@healthblawg, with Gregg Masters, aka&amp;nbsp;@2healthguru,&amp;nbsp;as moderator and host.
To listen live, or via archived replay,&amp;nbsp;click here. During the broadcast you may also listen in via&amp;nbsp;(619) 393-2836, and even participate in t...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4664298</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:05:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4664298</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A One in a Hundred Whitepaper: “Better to Best” Transcends PCMH, Care Coordination, Access, HIT, and ACO Payment Reform</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4664300&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FB9uML3xGuUk%2F</link>
            <description>Let me try to get you in the right frame of mind to read one of the most remarkable white papers in a long time: Better to BEST: Value Driving Elements of the Patient Centered Medical Home and Accountable Care Organizations — released yesterday by the Commonwealth Fund, Dartmouth Institute, and PCPCC.
Having been a debater in high school and then trained as a lawyer, my default mode of thinking is to be critical:
“Hey, Vince, how ya doin&amp;#8217;? Great day isn&amp;#8217;t it?”
“Well, …err…maybe, maybe not…actually, here&amp;#8217;s 14 reasons why not.”
My wife and friends kindly tell me that this personal quality can be insufferable, and if you&amp;#8217;ve ever met a lawyer you know what I&amp;#8217;m talking about. My internal defense mechanism against my inner-critical brain is simply to...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4664300</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:48:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4664300</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The 6th Thing to Watch in the Medicare ACO Regulations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4658436&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FoVM7gUfkvy0%2F</link>
            <description>Health care lobbyists and advocates are bracing for six pages of the health care reform law to explode into more than 1,000 pages of federal regulations when the Department of Health and Human Services releases its long-delayed accountable care organization rules this week. Politico
What should you be looking for as you snuggle by the fireplace this weekend reading the draft ACO regs?
Rob Lazerow writes a helpful article listing 5 Things to Watch in the Medicare Shared Savings Program Proposed Rule. His list of five key design issues includes:

How will patients be assigned to ACOs?
To what cost benchmark will ACOs be compared?
How will bonuses be calculated and paid?
For which quality metrics will ACOs be responsible?
What is the application process?

I&amp;#8217;d like to add a sixth  ite...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4658436</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:03:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4658436</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Crucial Distinction Between “Accountable Care” and ACOs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4610871&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FSjXt2mNST7s%2F</link>
            <description>While in Philadelphia earlier this week, my colleague Dr. David Nace presented me with a print copy of McKesson Relay Health&amp;#8217;s newest whitepaper &amp;#8212; Providing Accountability: Accountable Care Concepts for Providers.  I felt honored as he handed it to me and confided that it was one of only six copies in print.  I took time to read it carefully on the long flight home.
The whitepaper is a great overview of accountable care and ACOs (Accountable Care Organizations). It&amp;#8217;s a quick and easily digestible read.
However, there is one key point articulated in the paper that I&amp;#8217;d like to emphasize here:
accountable care is not synonymous with ACOs.
 (more&amp;#8230;)

 Article Series - Accountable Care Organizations: Cure-du-Jour or Real Collaborative Care?The Big Idea in U...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4610871</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:25:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4610871</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is Economic Credentialing A Tool for Primary Care to Lead ACOs?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4512460&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FL1cOu3ulj6M%2F</link>
            <description>Is economic credentialing — the use of economic factors such as loyalty and utilization rates in the physician credentialing process — a potential tool for primary care physicians to lead ACOs?   and reestablish the vitality of primary care in American health care?
Keith Wright and Gregory Drutchas&amp;#8217; incisive article Economic Credentialing: A Prescription To Secure Shared Savings Under Accountable Care provides useful history and context about economic credentialing:
For many years, the use of economic factors by hospitals in making medical staff credentialing decisions has been the subject of much discussion and debate among physicians, groups such as the American Medical Association (AMA), healthcare providers, payors, and attorneys….the implementation of healthcare reform...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4512460</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:31:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4512460</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HSR Study: Focus on High-Cost Medicare Beneficiaries</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4482850&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FGmgPMF_9Ks8%2F</link>
            <description>Conclusions. Health reform policies currently envisioned to improve care and lower costs may have small effects on high-cost patients who consume most resources. Instead, developing interventions tailored to improve care and lowering cost for specific types of complex and costly patients may hold greater potential for ‘‘bending the cost curve.’’
This research uses patient-level data and a much richer set of explanatory factors than previous studies to examine key patient, physician, practice, and market characteristics associated with costs of high-cost Medicare beneficiaries, defined as the top 25 percent of beneficiaries arrayed by expected Medicare costs… we estimate determinants of Medicare expenditures (costs) at the beneficiary level….After exclusions, the analysis sampl...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4482850</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:17:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4482850</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Complimentary Webinar — An Impending Marriage: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Care Management Software</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4429079&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F32qW7qHRZ2A%2F</link>
            <description>Webinar Title: An Impending Marriage: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Care Management Software
The presentation will be geared at practicing clinical case managers in health plans, hospitals, disease management companies, and similar organizations:

Describe market forces driving integration of EHRs and care management software. 
Review care management software survey data and stimulus funding for EHR adoption. 
Describe a 3 stage framework for the evolution of EHRs and care management software. 
Characterize benefits to patients and impacts on care manager responsibilities.

The event is sponsored by HealthSciences Institute and the PartnersinImprovement Alliance.
When:
Friday, February 4, 2011
11:30 am Eastern Time
10:30 am Central Time
9:30 am Mountain Time
8:30 am Pacific Time...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4429079</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:13:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4429079</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“The Hot Spotters”: Is Better Care For The Neediest Patients The Answer To Lower Healthcare Costs?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4419136&amp;cid=t_113822_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fthe-hot-spotters-is-better-care-for-the-neediest-patients-the-answer-to-lower-healthcare-costs%2F2011.01.31</link>
            <description>Author-physician Dr. Atul Gawande has done it again with a well-written article in The New Yorker magazine entitled, &amp;#8220;The Hot Spotters.&amp;#8221; It deals with the fact that 5 percent of people with chronic illness make up over 50 percent of all healthcare costs.
If we can zero in on providing better preventive care for those people, we can finally get our arms around runaway healthcare costs. How great that you don&amp;#8217;t even have to have a New Yorker subscription to read it. Here are a few cliff notes until you get to it:
&amp;#8211; In Camden, New Jersey, one percent of patients account for one-third of the city&amp;#8217;s medical costs. By just focusing attention on the social and medical outpatient needs of those people, they not only got healthier but costs were cut in half.
&amp;#8...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4419136</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4419136</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Will ACO IT Models Be Walled Gardens or Open Platforms?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4265923&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FMJs5VvLnXPs%2F</link>
            <description>Will ACO (accountable care organization) IT models be walled gardens or open platforms?  i.e., will ACO IT platforms focus on exchanging information within the provider network of the ACO, or will they also be able to exchange information with providers outside the ACO network? (If the question still isn&amp;#8217;t clear, click here for a further explanation.). (more&amp;#8230;)

 Article Series - Accountable Care Organizations: Cure-du-Jour or Real Collaborative Care?The Big Idea in Understanding &amp;#8220;Accountable Care Organizations&amp;#8221;The Achilles Heel of ACOs? Shared Savings Payment Model Unlikely to Motivate HospitalsA Dark Horse in ACO Formation: Large Physician Groups&amp;#8220;Does This ACO Thing Really Mean We Need to be &amp;#8216;Accountable&amp;#8217;&amp;#8221;Will ACO IT Models Be Walled Ga...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4265923</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:45:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4265923</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Newt Gingrich’s Take On Facebook Saving A Woman’s Life</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4249056&amp;cid=t_113822_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fnewt-gingrichs-take-on-facebook-saving-a-womans-life%2F2010.12.10</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;ve seen at least half a dozen links to the op-ed coauthored by Newt Gingrich and neurosurgeon Kamal Thapar about how the doctor used information on Facebook to save a woman&amp;#8217;s life. (It was published by AOL News. Really.)
In brief, a woman who had been to see a number of different health care providers without getting a clear diagnosis showed up in an emergency room, went into a coma and nearly died. She was saved by a doctor&amp;#8217;s review of the detailed notes she kept about her symptoms, etc., which she posted on Facebook. The story is vague on the details, but apparently her son facilitated getting the doc access to her Facebook page, and the details posted there allowed him to diagnose and treat her condition. She recovered fully.
Newt and Dr. Thapar wax rhapsodic about...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4249056</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:00:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4249056</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MGH Medicare Disease/Care Management Demo Shows Home Run Results!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4225414&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2Fuw7kIPbTkeY%2F</link>
            <description>Medicare has (finally) recently released a report showing home run results for a disease/care management demonstration project!
Evaluation of Medicare Care Management for High Cost Beneficiaries (CMHCB) Demonstration: Massachusetts General Hospital and Massachusetts General Physicians Organization (MGH)
Remind Me Again About the CMHCB Medicare Demo…
The CMHCB started in 2005. My recollection is that the demo requirements were extremely similar to the Medicare Health Support (MHS) project, with a few exceptions: 1) Applicants had to include direct care providers (delivery systems, physicians) in their program design, 2) patient populations were significantly smaller than MHS.  Please comment on anything I&amp;#8217;m missing.
I&amp;#8217;ve included an addendum at the bottom providing more...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4225414</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:35:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4225414</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is “CMS Innovation Center” an Oxymoron?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4179379&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FJ8Pn-MgOs5s%2F</link>
            <description>A press release earlier this week announced the new CMS Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation.
If you went to their Twitter feed today, here&amp;#8217;s what you&amp;#8217;d see:


This struck me as a great pictorial representation of the broader challenges the CMS Innovation Center faces:

They&amp;#8217;ve kinda sorta figured out there&amp;#8217;s a conversation going on out there — they&amp;#8217;ve joined Twitter
They haven&amp;#8217;t figured out that they need to listen:  Following = 0
They haven&amp;#8217;t figured out they they need to talk:  Tweets = 0

I remain hopeful, but the CMS Innovation Center has a long way to go.  Dr. Berwick, opening up this closed organization is going to be the challenge of your lifetime.


	Tags: CMI, CMS, health reform, Medicare (Source: e-CareManagement)</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4179379</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:57:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4179379</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Misusing Medical Technology And Escalating The Cost Of Healthcare</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4133715&amp;cid=t_113822_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fmisusing-medical-technology-and-escalating-the-cost-of-healthcare%2F2010.11.03</link>
            <description>Guest post by Stephen C. Schimpff, M.D.
We are often told that the reason for the high cost of medical care is all of our new technologies and drugs. There is an element of truth in that but when used correctly, new technologies save lives and improve the quality of patient care and often improve safety. But technologies used inappropriately increase costs while not improving quality and may adversely impact safety.
A patient example
An older woman had been coming to the same primary care physician (PCP) as her daughter for over twenty years. She lived in another city about 30 miles distant but she preferred to visit the doctor with her daughter. She also occasionally saw a doctor near her home if she had an immediate problem.
On nearly every visit she said that she felt “tired.” Re...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4133715</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:00:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4133715</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Does This ACO Thing Really Mean We Need to be ‘Accountable’”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4125106&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FiVKcHAfiCcc%2F</link>
            <description>The American College of Physicians (ACP) just released a well-reasoned and thorough position paper, The Patient-Centered Medical Home Neighbor: The Interface of the Patient-Centered Medical Home with Specialty/Subspecialty Practices.
As I&amp;#8217;ve written before, the Big Idea behind ACOs (Accountable Care Organizations) is the notion of accountability, not the specifics of organizational structure.
The purpose of the ACP position paper is to address the gaps that exist in care coordination when a physician refers a patient to a specialist. The obvious and logical answer proposed is to develop “Care Coordination Agreements” between primary care physicians and referring specialists, and the position paper takes 35 pages to explain why and how.
A simplified way of thinking about Care...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4125106</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:28:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4125106</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Webinar: Beacon Communities Reshaping Landscape for HIT and Population Health</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4098122&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FPhoA0bPGIvk%2F</link>
            <description>Tuesday, Oct. 26, 1-2 p.m. Eastern Time — Presented by the Care Continuum Alliance
Federally supported &amp;#8220;Beacon Communities&amp;#8221; are at work now defining how health information technology will support accountable, evidence-based care in communities &amp;#8211; especially for care of chronic conditions. Backed by $235 million in federal grants, 15 communities across the country are serving as Beacon Community pilots for eventual wide-scale, performance-based use of technology to improve our health care delivery system.
The goal of the webinar is to address

The fundamental nature and vision of the Beacon Community Program
How the Beacon Program will influence nationwide delivery system reform and be a guide-path toward developing community infrastructures
Other implications for the fu...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4098122</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:09:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4098122</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Care Coordination Metrics: One Can of Worms that NEEDS to be Opened</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4065439&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FR13qXxm3a_c%2F</link>
            <description>“Track who is on a care team — and share info with the patient.”
That&amp;#8217;s just one of the summary recommendations coming from expert testimony given in a recent public hearing on how to improve care coordination through the use of health information technology. The Meaningful Use workgroup and Quality Measures workgroups are now wrestling with how to translate this recommendation into meaningful use criteria for HITECH Stages 2 and 3.
Seems like a good idea — simple, straightforward — perhaps even obvious. The EHR (electronic health record) could be a great tool for keeping care team members in the loop and on the same page about a patient&amp;#8217;s care.
But then I thought about this for a few minutes, and the complexities started dawning. This seemingly simple recomme...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4065439</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 02:14:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4065439</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hospital Readmissions Avoidance “Programs” — Vendors and Hospitals Not All On the Same Wavelength</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4036758&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FdrvBwJYXAbs%2F</link>
            <description>Last week I attended and participated in an excellent conference — the National Reducing Hospital Readmissions Forum sponsored by World Research Group.
One of my main take aways is to observe a simple — yet huge — difference in mindset between hospital executives and vendors.
Over the past few months I&amp;#8217;ve heard many vendors with diverse health care offerings talking about building readmission avoidance “programs” that they want to sell to hospitals.  Their idea here is to put together a soup-to-nuts offering of technologies and services — a “program” that hospitals would mostly outsource to a 3rd  party vendor.
This concept has never quite sat right with me. Having spent the first 15 years of my career in and around the hospital world, I&amp;#8217;ve often observe...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4036758</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:35:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4036758</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The State-of-the-Art of Care Management Software: Disconnected</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4018247&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FMFllEgfzgTU%2F</link>
            <description>Care management software is intended to help patients make critical connections across the health care delivery system.  Today it&amp;#8217;s used primarily by 3rd party care managers who are typically either employed directed or indirectly by payers. While not surprising, the state-of-the-art of care management software is that it continues to function as disconnected islands of information.
The  2010 Health Information Technology Survey (available at no charge) provides an insightful yet sobering snapshot of care management software. The study was sponsored by TCS Healthcare Technologies, the Case Management Society of America, and the American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians.
The study consists of answers from 670 respondents who chose to fill out to a ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4018247</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:37:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4018247</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Playing Video Games Improves Same Hand-Eye Coordination Used By Surgeons</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4003205&amp;cid=t_113822_83_f&amp;fid=34856&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Finsidesurgery.com%2F2010%2F09%2Fplaying-video-games-improves-handeye-coordination-surgeons%2F</link>
            <description>New research published in the journal Cortex shows that the hand-eye coordination skills developed in playing video games is very similar to the skills obtained by top laparoscopic surgeons. Lead author Joshua Granek of the Vision Research Center in York, Canada shares his thoughts on his study. (Source: Inside Surgery)</description>
            <author>Inside Surgery</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4003205</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:42:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4003205</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Soldiers Don’t Trust the Military to Help with Suicide</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4003292&amp;cid=t_113822_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F09%2F27%2Fsoldiers-dont-trust-the-military-to-help-with-suicide%2F</link>
            <description>From the &amp;#8220;Not really surprising&amp;#8221; file&amp;#8230; Returning soldiers and military veterans don&amp;#8217;t really hold much hope or trust in the military to help them with their mental health needs &amp;#8212; especially suicidal thoughts &amp;#8212; according to a new report. 
And why would they? The military is their employer. Would you feel comfortable talking to your bosses about all of your mental health issues? And not just mild stuff either, this is the serious depression, &amp;#8220;I want to kill myself&amp;#8221; stuff. 
Most of us would be extremely uncomfortable with such a conversation. We would be even more uncomfortable with such a conversation knowing it is being recorded in our work record, and will follow us around for the rest of our professional career.
This is exactly what happens ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4003292</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:36:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4003292</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Megatrend Spotting: Health Plan Role of Having “Best Data About YOUR Medical Conditions” is Up for Grabs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3965524&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FW7-Cvm8tO98%2F</link>
            <description>Who has the most comprehensive data about YOUR clinical conditions?
For most people, the answer today is “your health plan”, but it’s not at all clear that health plans will continue to have this role in the future.
As physicians and hospitals adopt EHRs, it’s foreseeable that clinical data about patients will be far more available and accessible.
Will patient data become:

A jockeying point for control and business advantage between health plans and care providers,
A collaborative opportunity to optimize clinical care and care coordination, or
Both? (more&amp;#8230;)


 Article Series - Stages 2 and 3 of HITECH: The Golden Era of Care Coordination or Bureaucrats Practicing Medicine?Overview: Here Come Stages 2 and 3 of HITECH!Megatrend Spotting: Health Plan Role of Having “Best Data...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3965524</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:23:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3965524</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Overview: Here Come Stages 2 and 3 of HITECH!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3946560&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F5rv0xNvyUfk%2F</link>
            <description> 
We’ve spent the past year creating the MU (meaningful use) requirements for Stage 1 of the HITECH act.  As shown by the diagram above, Stage 1 focuses on Data Capture and Sharing. Now it’s time to begin to focus on Stage 2 (Advanced Clinical Processes) and Stage 3 (Improved Outcomes).
The current generation of EMRs (electronic medical records) were designed primarily to assist care providers with clinical documentation, billing, and maximizing revenues. They were not designed to enable care coordination and optimize population health.  
This essay is the first in a new, ongoing series that will highlight:

Design and metrics for Stages 2 and 3 of the HITECH act
Companies and care providers developing and using applications targeting Stage 2 and 3 MU objectives

This first essay wi...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3946560</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:49:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3946560</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>7 Under-The-Radar Healthcare Changes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3746740&amp;cid=t_113822_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2F7-under-the-radar-healthcare-changes%2F2010.07.12</link>
            <description>Kaiser Health News proves its value once again with an under-the-radar story covering some items you won&amp;#8217;t see in many other news sources. An excerpt:
&amp;#8220;&amp;#8230;several lesser-known provisions also take effect in coming months that could have a lasting impact on the nation&amp;#8217;s health care system.
These provisions include eliminating patients&amp;#8217; co-payments for certain preventive services such as mammograms, giving the government more power to review health insurers&amp;#8217; premium increases and allowing states to expand Medicaid coverage to low-income adults without children.
While these changes might not have gotten at lot of attention, they could help build support for the law in the run-up to the contentious mid-term elections.&amp;#8221;
Their list:
• Prevention For Less...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3746740</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:00:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3746740</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medicare MAPCP Medical Home Demo: CMS Kicks Sands in the States’ Faces</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3714288&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F1pHczcOEMmE%2F</link>
            <description>Conclusion: Think Twice Before Signing Up

1) The Promise
The sandbox metaphor was first used by the National Academy for State Health Policy:
For the 10 or more states that are active stakeholders in multi-payer medical home initiatives, the promise of Medicare getting in the sandbox with them and playing (a.k.a. paying) is an exciting proposition. The addition of Medicare as payer to some of these state initiatives may be the critical tipping point that results in widespread primary care delivery system reform in states by involving more practices, payers and patients. (more&amp;#8230;)

 Article Series - Medicare's New Direction for the Medical HomeCMS Shelves Medicare Medical Home DemonstrationMedicare&amp;#8217;s Biggest Change in 40 Years on the Horizon?Three Years Of Medical Home Demonstrat...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3714288</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:11:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3714288</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How An Empowered Patient Finds A New Doctor</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3603595&amp;cid=t_113822_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fhow-an-empowered-patient-finds-a-new-doctor%2F2010.05.26</link>
            <description>What if the average patient (person) knew what healthcare insiders, providers and expert patients know?
Take the process of looking for a new personal physician. Conventional wisdom tells people that when looking for a new physician they need to consider things like specialty, board certification, years in practice, and geographic proximity. Online services like Health Grades allow you to see and compare the satisfaction scores for prospective physician candidates.
But industry insiders know different. Consider those patient satisfaction scores for physicians. In reality, “one can assume that the quality of care is actually worse than surveys of patient satisfaction would seem to show,” according to a 1991 lecture by Avedis Donabedian, M.D.:
“Often patients are, in fact, overly pati...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3603595</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 16:00:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3603595</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is HITECH Working? #6: HITECH and Health Reform Objectives are Synergistic</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3538242&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FdIwL5RIMh8Y%2F</link>
            <description>by Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA and David C. Kibbe MD, MBA
.
….or to be more specific, HITECH is synergistic with payment reform that could come from the recently passed national health care reform legislation — the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
We’ll keep this post fairly short and try to avoid many of the more divisive aspects of this topic. The need for healthcare payment reform is well understood on both sides of the aisle:
Realizing the full potential of health IT depends in no small measure on changing the health care system’s overall payment incentives so that providers benefit from improving the quality and efficiency of the services they provide. Only then will they be motivated to take full advantage of the power of electronic health records. Dr. David...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3538242</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 23:52:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3538242</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Plastic Surgeon Is The King Of Donkey Kong</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3524118&amp;cid=t_113822_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fplastic-surgeon-is-the-king-of-donkey-kong%2F2010.04.30</link>
            <description>Donkey Kong has a new recordholder &amp;#8212; and he’s a plastic surgeon.
Hank Chien, M.D., scored 1,061,700 points in 2 hours and 35 minutes, breaking the world-record score for the classic arcade game.
Read the piece to learn how he did it, and more interestingly, the painstaking steps he had to take to verify his score.
The feat does lend some anecdotal support linking video games and the hand-eye coordination required for surgery. There are small studies linking the laparoscopic skill of surgeons with how well they do on video games. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at KevinMD.com* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3524118</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:00:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3524118</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>PCMH and Healthcare Reform: Avoiding Drowning in an Ocean of Opportunity</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3448955&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F_fkdKFOL_90%2F</link>
            <description>This article appears in the April 2010 issue of Medical Home News.
First, the good news: There are a lot of pilot and demonstration projects potentially involving the Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) in newly enacted Federal health care reform legislation – the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
Then, the bad news: There are a lot of pilot and demonstration projects potentially involving the PCMH in the PPACA.
&amp;#8230;so many that the PCMH risks being drowned in an ocean of opportunity.
I’d like to make a few simple points in this essay:

The number of authorized pilots and demos in the PPACA is staggering
This creates both opportunities and challenges
PCMH focus will be required to navigate the ocean

 (more&amp;#8230;)
 Article Series - Medicare's New Direction for th...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3448955</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:15:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3448955</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pilots, Demonstrations &amp; Innovation in the PPACA Healthcare Reform Legislation</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3416118&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F2hl9dJni6rA%2F</link>
            <description>Here’s a bit of trivia that will make you the hit of the next cocktail party you attend.  How many times are the words “demonstration” and “pilot” mentioned in the newly passed Federal healthcare reform legislation — the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)?
Answer:

“demonstration” — 312 mentions
“pilot” — 80 mentions

This weekend I’ve been trying to wrap my head around the question “Just what are these demos and pilots in the PPACA all about?” I have been boggled by the sheer number and complexity, and thought I’d share some findings from my first dive.
Why are These Pilots and Demonstrations Important?
 (more&amp;#8230;)
No tag for this post. (Source: e-CareManagement)</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3416118</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:58:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3416118</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Long Have We Known This?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3259061&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FVLEXdRRjotg%2F</link>
            <description>Hospitals charge on a cost basis, which places no penalty on inefficient operations. Moreover, present systems of hospital management make it very difficult to maintain effective control over hospital costs. The Commission concluded:
&amp;#8220;If the needs for health care are to be met, the health care system must be organized to employ its resources with more wisdom and effectiveness. The two areas which appear to offer the greatest potential for improvement are (1) reducing unnecessary (or unnecessarily expensive) medical care and (2) increasing efficiency in the provision of hospital care.&amp;#8221;
It will not be easy to carry out this recommendation.
Who said this? &amp;#8230;and when? (more&amp;#8230;)
No tag for this post. (Source: e-CareManagement)</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3259061</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:54:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3259061</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is Gawande Right? Are Pilot Programs the Key to Delivery System Cost Reductions?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3067156&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FmEkR3q1jQvs%2F</link>
            <description>Atul Gawande’s most recent New Yorker article “Testing, Testing” addresses the critics who lament that there is no master plan to curb delivery system costs in pending health reform legislation.
Gawande retorts: “Is that a bad thing?”
…and he answers his own question by describing the value of pilot programs contained in both the Senate and House versions of health reform legislation.
Is Gawande correct?  Yes and no….
 (more&amp;#8230;)
 Article Series - Medicare's New Direction for the Medical HomeCMS Shelves Medicare Medical Home DemonstrationMedicare&amp;#8217;s Biggest Change in 40 Years on the Horizon?Three Years Of Medical Home Demonstration Preparation Down the Drain?The Real Secret Sauce of Medicare’s Participation in Regional Collaboratives &amp;#8212; Network EffectsIs Gawan...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3067156</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:45:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3067156</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medicare Extends PHR Pilot — Big Mistake!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3012474&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FmQyPb5p5cGU%2F</link>
            <description>Medicare announced today that it is extending its Personal Health Record (PHR) pilot project for residents of Utah and Arizona.
This is a waste of time and taxpayer dollars. Those of you who read my blog know that I’m a big fan of PHRs, but you have to know when you’re backing the wrong approach.
What’s wrong with this pilot project? A lot:
 (more&amp;#8230;)

	Tags: business model, EHRs/PHRs, HIE, Medicare, platform (Source: e-CareManagement)</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3012474</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:09:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3012474</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Real Secret Sauce of Medicare’s Participation in Regional Collaboratives — Network Effects</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3003871&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FE-Jk96eOPWk%2F</link>
            <description>Last week I asked whether Medicare’s Biggest Change in 40 Years is on the horizon. That post described and discussed implications of Medicare’s new direction for the medical home — the shelving of Medicare Medical Home Demonstration (MMHD) and the refocusing on the recently announced Multi-Payer Advanced Primary Care Initiative (MAPCI).
In that post I touched briefly on the potential for MAPCI to create effective networks at multiple levels — contracting networks, health IT networks, social and collaborative care networks.  I’d like to expand a bit today…
So, why is Medicare’s participation in MAPCI  and other regional collaboratives such a big deal? Here’s my hypothesis:
Medicare’s non-participation (to-date) in regional payer/provider collaboratives has been a rate...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3003871</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:53:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3003871</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Three Years Of Medical Home Demonstration Preparation Down the Drain?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2984882&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F2NyU0BDII1g%2F</link>
            <description>Do you remember the scene in the movie Animal House where Bluto Blutarski laments “…seven years of college education down the drain?”
Why aren’t primary care physicians expressing similar laments about  the shelving of the MMHD (Medicare Medical Home Demonstration) in favor of the MAPCI (Multi-Payer Advanced Primary Care Initiative).
My colleague Jaan Sidorov, MD and I pick up on no signs of discontent.  Read our essay “Three Years of Medical Home Demonstration Preparation Down the Drain?” on Dr. Sidorov’s blog.
 
 
 Article Series - Medicare's New Direction for the Medical HomeCMS Shelves Medicare Medical Home DemonstrationMedicare&amp;#8217;s Biggest Change in 40 Years on the Horizon?Three Years Of Medical Home Demonstration Preparation Down the Drain? Previous in series 
...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2984882</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:45:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2984882</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medicare’s Biggest Change in 40 Years on the Horizon?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2943908&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2Fsny5F8u6dgs%2F</link>
            <description>Earlier this week CMS issued a typically cryptic Announcement indicating that they were shelving the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration (MMHD) and instead would focus on the recently announced Multi-Payer Advanced Primary Care Initiative (MAPCI). My blog post from Tuesday provides details and asks the question “What does all this mean?”
Today’s blog post will tackle:

Medicare’s biggest change in 40 years?
The rise of MAPCI
The fall of MMHD
Implications/discussion

Medicare’s Biggest Change in 40 Years?

 (more&amp;#8230;)

	Tags: business model, care coordination, care management, conference, EHR, health plan, health reform, HIE, hospital, meaningful use, medical home, Medicare, Medicare Medical Home Demonstration, multipayer, network effect, primary care, readmission (Source: e-C...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2943908</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:35:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2943908</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>CMS Shelves Medicare Medical Home Demonstration</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2931085&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F5FVQDknxCBw%2F</link>
            <description>I just received an email from CMS announcing the latest official word on the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration (MMHD):
10/26/2009 &amp;#8211; In Washington, the efforts to reform health care and health insurance include proposed legislative language that would have an impact on the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration as described in section 204 of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 and amended by section 133 of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008. Specifically, section 1302 of House Bill 3200 contains a provision to repeal this demonstration and replace it with an independent practitioner-based medical home pilot described further in the bill. In addition, the House bill includes a second medical home pilot to evaluate community-based medical home models...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2931085</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:59:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2931085</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Complimentary Webinar: Introduction to Clinical Groupware and the Clinical Groupware Collaborative</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2904964&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F0_vhnMGH51k%2F</link>
            <description>BrightTALK is sponsoring a complimentary Electronic Health Record Summit this Tuesday, October 20, 2009.
David C. Kibbe MD, MBA and I will be presenting “Introduction to Clinical Groupware and the Clinical Groupware Collaborative”

Clinical groupware is a new and evolving model for the development and deployment of health information technology (HIT) platforms and applications having the following characteristics:


Use of the Internet and the web for EHR technology.


Explicit design for information sharing and online communication among providers and patients/consumers.


A modular or component architecture upon which applications can be aggregated to meet specific clinical and workflow tasks.


Patient/consumer engagement tools that facilitate ongoing health management and care coo...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2904964</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:03:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2904964</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HITECH Health IT Legislation: Opportunities for the DMAA Community</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2832251&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FtVXihMwiuC0%2F</link>
            <description>Dr. Don Storey and I spoke at the at The Forum 09 conference in San Diego earlier this week. The DMAA publication “The Continuum” had an excellent writeup of our enthusiastically received presentation. 
Here’s a copy of our PowerPoint slides…
HITECH Health IT Legislation: Opportunities for the DMAA Community
View more presentations from vincek.
and here’s DMAA’s writeup:
Helping physicians and hospitals meet the “meaningful use” criteria for federal support for health information technology under recently passed legislation represents a keen opportunity for the population health management industry, presenters at this session said yesterday.
Vince Kuraitis, JD, MBA, of Better Health Technologies, LLC, and Don Storey, MD, of RMD Networks, presented a look at the evolut...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2832251</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:54:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2832251</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lifemasters Bankruptcy: Will CMS Earn Reputation as a Good Business Partner or Thug?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2804026&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2Fb9XSyQWm-jU%2F</link>
            <description>In my post from Monday on LifeMasters seeking Chapter 11, I dropped a BTW comment.
The part that’s puzzling to me is the statement that LifeMasters owes $125 M to CMS.  That’s hard to figure…the company only participated in MHS for a few months, and to my knowledge MHS is the only Medicare demo that required guaranteed savings (i.e., payback if targets aren’t hit).  
I really have to stretch my imagination to compute how CMS ran the tab to such an astronomical number. It raises questions around CMS’ good faith as a business “partner”.
Let’s do the math.
 (more&amp;#8230;)
 Article Series - CMS Bumps Off Medicare Health SupportCMS: &amp;#8220;Rumors of Medicare Health Support&amp;#8217;s Death Have Not Been Greatly Exaggerated&amp;#8221;$389 M of Healthways&amp;#8217; Market Value Vaporiz...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2804026</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:56:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2804026</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medicare Health Support (MHS) Claims Another Victim: LifeMasters Files for Chapter 11</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2796539&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2Fp5se2G_011g%2F</link>
            <description>Updated 6:10 pm, September 14, 2009
One bad deal can ruin your day.
Today, LifeMasters filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.  According to its press release:
&amp;#8220;The Chapter 11 filing is the most efficient path for the company to restructure liabilities that are a result of Demonstration Projects previously performed under contracts with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), &amp;#8221; said George D. Pillari, President of LifeMasters. Mr. Pillari, named President of LifeMasters today, is a Managing Director of Alvarez &amp; Marsal Healthcare Industry Group, LLC and had been working with the company and its board as a restructuring advisor prior to the filing.
During the last four years, LifeMasters participated in three CMS Demonstration Projects aimed at testing ce...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2796539</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:43:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2796539</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Part II — The Medicare Medical Home Demonstration: Crawling Out From Under the Rock</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2761973&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FcUFc7zNwVKs%2F</link>
            <description>In Part I of my guest post on The Collaborative Forum blog, I wrote that the Medicare Medical Home Demo is in BIG Trouble. Here’s a recap:

Political reality dictates that the MMHD must save costs.
As currently structured, the MMHD cannot achieve cost savings

In any given year, only a small percentage of patients account for the vast majority of costs
Lessons from previous Medicare disease/care management demonstrations has shown that effective care coordination interventions must be targeted at this population
Medicare has structured the MMHD so that any patient with one or more chronic condition is eligible; this includes 86% of all Medicare patients.
Physicians will be paid risk-adjusted care coordination fees for this entire population — the 86% of patients with one or more chron...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2761973</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:39:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2761973</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Meaningful Use” Criteria as a Unifying Force</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2699695&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2Fno1LFrhNDCM%2F</link>
            <description>by Vince Kuraitis, Steve Adams, and David C. Kibbe MD, MBA
Over the past several years, many diverse initiatives have arisen offering partial solutions to systemic problems in the U.S. health care non-system. 
We see Meaningful Use Criteria recommended by the HIT Policy Committee as a unifying force for these previously disparate initiatives. These initiatives have included:

Patient Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs)
Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs)/Health Information Exchanges (HIEs)
Payer Disease/Care Management Programs
Personal Health Record Platforms — Google Health, Microsoft HealthVault, Dossia, health banks, more to come
State/Regional Chronic Care Programs (e.g., Colorado, Pennsylvania, Improving Performance in Practice)
Accountable Care Organizations — the n...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2699695</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:41:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2699695</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medical Home Savings Claims in Medicaid are Not Plausible</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2670910&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FWgmP776-3Xk%2F</link>
            <description>by Al Lewis, Disease Management Purchasing Consortium International, Inc.
Medical homes probably do save money in very controlled settings, where the entire team is literally or at least figuratively under one roof, such as Kaiser.  However, the belief that one can overlay a traditional medical home model across an entire state and save money in the process turns out to be total fiction.
The poster child for that fiction, North Carolina&amp;#8217;s Community Care program, turns out to cost state taxpayers probably $400 million a year, rather than save them $300 million, as the state&amp;#8217;s self-serving and blatantly incorrect analysis claimed.    A more extensive analysis is available for review, and any state is welcome to the backup data as well.
Here’s a press release with more detai...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2670910</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:40:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2670910</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medicare Medical Home Demo (MMHD) is in BIG Trouble</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2670911&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FvIdWeuqPmyk%2F</link>
            <description>Between the time the MMHD was authorized in 2006 and now, we’ve learned a lot about what works and what doesn’t work in Medicare care coordination programs. The MMHD is between a rock and a hard place — conflicted by two “must achieve” objectives that are diametrically opposed:

As a political matter, the MMHD must save money
As currently structured, the MMHD cannot save money

Please read my guest post
The Medicare Medical Home Demonstration (MMHD): Between a Rock and a Hard Place
over at Pharos Innovations new blog: The Collaborative Forum.
Is there a way out from between the rock and the hard place?  In Part II of this series, Dr. Randy Williams will discuss options.
Disclosure: Pharos Innovations is a client of Better Health Technologies, LLC.

	Tags: care coordination, medi...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2670911</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:11:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2670911</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Blueprint for Change: From EMR 1.0 to Clinical Groupware (EHR 2.0)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2580276&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F0wBiPYi-N2o%2F</link>
            <description>by Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA and David C. Kibbe MD, MBA
The last article in this series — Time for EHRs to Become Plug-and-Play — used words to describe a major industry shift underway in health IT.
Sometimes pictures help to make a point. Here are several diagrams that you can also download as PowerPoint slides.
 Computer Industry 1983 to 2002

 
  Source: Venkatraman, N. Winning in a Network Centric Era, 2006


Blueprint for Health IT Shift 
From EMR 1.0 — 2008…

…to Clinical Groupware/EHR 2.0 — 2012 (more&amp;#8230;)
 Article Series - The Dog Manifesto: A Disruptive Innovator's Guide to Health ITWill HITECH Lead to Innovation? The Continuing Cat/Dog DialogueDogged Optimism: Five Innovative Aspects of HITECHFeline Foot-Dragging: Three Non-Innovative Aspects of HITECHWait and S...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2580276</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:18:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2580276</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Blueprint for Change: From EMR 1.0 to Clinical Groupware (EHR 2.0)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2511413&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F0wBiPYi-N2o%2F</link>
            <description>by Vince Kuraitis JD, MBA and David C. Kibbe MD, MBA
The last article in this series — Time for EHRs to Become Plug-and-Play — used words to describe a major industry shift underway in health IT.
Sometimes pictures help to make a point. Here are several diagrams that you can also download as PowerPoint slides.
 Computer Industry 1983 to 2002

 
 
Blueprint for Health IT Shift 
From EMR 1.0 — 2008…

…to Clinical Groupware/EHR 2.0 — 2012 (more&amp;#8230;)
 Article Series - The Dog Manifesto: A Disruptive Innovator's Guide to Health ITWill HITECH Lead to Innovation? The Continuing Cat/Dog&amp;nbsp;DialogueDogged Optimism: Five Innovative Aspects of&amp;nbsp;HITECHFeline Foot-Dragging: Three Non-Innovative Aspects of&amp;nbsp;HITECHWait and See: What&amp;#8217;s Unclear or To-Be-Determined (TBD) ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2511413</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:18:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2511413</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Landmark Report: “The Promise of Care Coordination” in Medicare</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2580290&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FkBeDK-VyyFs%2F</link>
            <description>Download a copy here .  Excerpts from the Executive Summary:
Effective Interventions
Three types of interventions have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing hospitalizations for Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions who in general are not cognitively impaired:

Transitional care interventions in which patients are first engaged while in the hospital and then followed intensively over the 4 &amp;#8211; 6 weeks after discharge
Self-management education interventions that engage patients for 4 -7 weeks in community-based programs designed to “activate” them in the management of their chronic conditions
Coordinated care interventions that identify patients with chronic conditions at high risk of hospitalization in the coming year, conduct initial assessments and care...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2580290</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:00:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2580290</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Landmark Report: “The Promise of Care Coordination” in Medicare</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2288961&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FkBeDK-VyyFs%2F</link>
            <description>Download a copy here .  Excerpts from the Executive Summary:
Effective Interventions
Three types of interventions have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing hospitalizations for Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions who in general are not cognitively impaired:

Transitional care interventions in which patients are first engaged while in the hospital and then followed intensively over the 4 - 6 weeks after discharge
Self-management education interventions that engage patients for 4 -7 weeks in community-based programs designed to “activate” them in the management of their chronic conditions
Coordinated care interventions that identify patients with chronic conditions at high risk of hospitalization in the coming year, conduct initial assessments and care plann...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2288961</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:00:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2288961</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Spider Webs of Care Coordination Networks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2211210&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F8CNlOodxzOM%2F</link>
            <description>We have learned that coordinating care of patients — particular care of Medicare patients — is complex and time consuming for physicians.
A breakthrough study quantifies just how complex and challenging care coordination really is.  The study is reported in the February 17 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine and is entitled Primary Care Physicians’ Links to Other Physicians Through Medicare Patients: The Scope of Care Coordination :
We found that in a single year for just fee-for-service Medicare patients, the typical primary care physician needs to coordinate care with 229 other physicians working in 117 different practices…. The number of peers was greater for physicians treating patients with higher chronic illness burden, who may benefit the most from coordination.
My m...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2211210</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:12:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2211210</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Spider Webs of Care Coordination Networks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2580298&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F8CNlOodxzOM%2F</link>
            <description>We have learned that coordinating care of patients — particular care of Medicare patients — is complex and time consuming for physicians.
A breakthrough study quantifies just how complex and challenging care coordination really is.  The study is reported in the February 17 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine and is entitled Primary Care Physicians’ Links to Other Physicians Through Medicare Patients: The Scope of Care Coordination :
We found that in a single year for just fee-for-service Medicare patients, the typical primary care physician needs to coordinate care with 229 other physicians working in 117 different practices…. The number of peers was greater for physicians treating patients with higher chronic illness burden, who may benefit the most from coordination.
My m...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2580298</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:06:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2580298</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Thankful for Life? Talk With Your Family About Dying - Engage with Grace</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1992524&amp;cid=t_113822_118_f&amp;fid=36984&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FHealthManagementRx%2F%7E3%2F466505634%2Fthankful-for-life-talk-with-your-family.html</link>
            <description>Blogger's Note: Please. Talk with your family, friends, advocates, and caregivers about end of life choices. Do you have an advanced directive? A living will? This is *not* the kind of thing you want to leave til the last minute (literally). Live well. Engage with grace. From the Engage with Grace team: We make choices throughout our lives - where we want to live, what types of activities will fill our days, with whom we spend our time. These choices are often a balance between our desires and our means, but at the end of the day, they are decisions made with intent. But when it comes to how we want to be treated at the end our lives, often we don't express our intent or tell our loved ones about it.This has real consequences. 73% of Americans would prefer to die at home, but up to 50% die...</description>
            <author>Health Management Rx</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1992524</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:25:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1992524</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Making the most of a referral for pain management</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1982188&amp;cid=t_113822_165_f&amp;fid=37959&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthskills.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F11%2F23%2Fmaking-the-most-of-a-referral-for-pain-management%2F</link>
            <description>This is a post for people who may refer someone for pain management, or someone who is personally being referred. When I talk about pain management, I&amp;#8217;m meaning a multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary pain management programme where participants learn about their pain, develop strategies to cope with life despite their pain, and get involved in reactivation.
The contents of a cognitive behavioural pain management programme (eg INPUT, ADAPT, vary considerably - it&amp;#8217;s essential that the approach includes these concepts:

 That clients can learn to accept the chronicity of their pain.


 That clients can change their relationship to their pain in a way that allows them to broaden their sense of identity/self beyond the pain to that of “a well person with pain”.


 That clients...</description>
            <author>HealthSkills Weblog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1982188</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:57:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1982188</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What’s the Best Way to Get Hospitals Involved in Care Coordination?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1833374&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F403257588%2F</link>
            <description>Pay them to do it, take money away when they don’t — make hospitals accountable for their role in avoiding unnecessary readmissions.

Mark E. Miller, Ph.D., Executive Director, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission testified recently in front of the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. He opened his remarks by stating:
The health care delivery system we see today is not a true system: care coordination is rare, specialist care is favored over primary care, quality of care is often poor, and costs are high and increasing at an unsustainable rate.
About a quarter of Mr. Miller’s testimony focused on an issue that hasn’t received much attention: avoidable hospital readmissions . Here are some key excerpts:
 (more&amp;#8230;) (Source: e-CareManagement)</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1833374</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:49:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1833374</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Megatrend Spotting: Collaborative Care Management Networks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1815619&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F400405909%2F</link>
            <description>“Why can’t we all just get along?”  Rodney King

The Megatrend: Collaborative Care Management Networks (CCMNs)
It’s been quite a while since I spotted a new Disease Management Megatrend, but here’s one that’s long overdue:
Collaborative Care Management Networks will be necessary to achieve optimal care coordination.
The trend in a nutshell:  payers (and others) are recognizing that optimal care coordination will require collaboration among health care stakeholders. This CANNOT be achieved with yesterday’s proprietary IT and business models.
CCMNs will share many — perhaps all — of the following elements:

	(...)Read the rest of Megatrend Spotting: Collaborative Care Management&amp;nbsp;Networks (528 words)
	
	&amp;copy; |
	Permalink |
	No comment |
			Want more on these topic...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1815619</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:35:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1815619</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Medical Home: Confusion Over Care Management Fees</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1439973&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F289763443%2F</link>
            <description>This report has stirred cries of confusion and outrage. I’ll elaborate on these cries in the second posting of this series, but if you can’t wait, read here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
Welcome to a series of three blog postings discussing the PCMH, care management fees, and the RUC report.  I can’t claim to smooth the uproar, but I hope to frame the issues so that they can be understood and discussed constructively.
The series will address numerous questions. This first post:

What is the PCMH care management fee?
Why is the PCMH care management fee important?
Why are people confused?

The second post:

What is the American Medical Association/Specialty Society RVS Update Committee (RUC) ?
What is the RUC’s role in the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1439973</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:00:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1439973</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>4 Reasons Why Health Plans Struggle with PHRs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1300456&amp;cid=t_113822_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F250829885%2F</link>
            <description>Aetna recently made another big announcement relating to their PHR.  While the concept of what they’re doing is very appealing, it strikes me that health plans in general face an uphill battle in getting consumers to adopt and use personal health records (PHRs).
I&amp;#8217;ll describe 4 factors behind my thinking:

Lack of Trust
Lack of Access to Clinical Data
Lack of Permission
Lack of Convenience in Consumer Workflow

 (more&amp;#8230;)
Share This

	Related posts (and # of comments)
	
	A First Comparison of Google Health and MS&amp;nbsp;HealthVault (5)
	Four Misconceptions About HealthVault and the Emerging Personal Health Information Ecosystem&amp;nbsp;(PHI-Ecosystem) (7)
	Connecting the Dots&amp;#8230;Google Health Promises to Create AND Dominate Next Generation&amp;nbsp;PHRs (44)
	Birth Announcement: th...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1300456</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:53:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1300456</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Recovering the Lost Literature on Dyslexia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=556192&amp;cid=t_113822_122_f&amp;fid=35065&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Feideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F04%2Frecovering-lost-literature-on-dyslexia.html</link>
            <description>In this study, Dr. Denckla tested dyslexic children (and followed them over time) on a map-walking test that involved drawing a similar pathway as one outlined in dots on a floor. &quot;The younger dyslexic children, that is children below the age of 10 years...had the worst performance of hte three groups, as measured by walking these routes correctly. A startling &quot;late blooming&quot; effect, however, shone forth in the data on children over 10 years old. The teenaged dyslexic group, and in particular the familial dyslexic adolescents demonstrated superior (my italics added) performance on this test, averaging better scores than the nondsylexic, otherwise learning-disabled and normal groups. What could these results possibly mean, and what do they have to do with the history of good athletic abilit...</description>
            <author>Eide Neurolearning Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=556192</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">556192</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

