<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: criticism,</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'criticism,'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22criticism%2C%22&t=%22criticism%2C%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:59:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Nanotech, health and longevity — who makes the predictions?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2865701&amp;cid=t_270706_107_f&amp;fid=34860&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corporeality.net%2Fmuseion%2F2009%2F10%2F06%2Fnanotech-health-and-longevity-who-makes-the-predictions%2F</link>
            <description>Last week, Computerworld carried an interview with futurist Ray Kurzweil, who predicts that in 30 or 40 years from now nanomachines will travel through our bodies, repairing damaged cells and organs, effectively wiping out diseases:
The full realization of nanobots will basically eliminate biological disease and aging. I think we&amp;#8217;ll see widespread use in 20 years of [nanotech] devices that perform certain functions for us. In 30 or 40 years, we will overcome disease and aging. The nanobots will scout out organs and cells that need repairs and simply fix them. It will lead to profound extensions of our health and longevity
What&amp;#8217;s interesting is not whether the prognosis is right or wrong, naïve or realistic. Like all med-tech forecasts it probably reflects our own time better...</description>
            <author>Biomedicine on Display</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2865701</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:00:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2865701</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Misuse of “Reform”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2858619&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FV_H28xZdTMg%2F</link>
            <description>When Samuel Johnson said that &amp;#8221;patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel,&amp;#8221; he overlooked the value of the word &amp;#8220;reform.&amp;#8221; (I didn&amp;#8217;t say this first, but I can&amp;#8217;t discover who did.) Webster&amp;#8217;s says that &amp;#8220;reform&amp;#8221; means &amp;#8220;to put or change into an improved form or condition [or] to amend or improve by change of form or removal of faults or abuses.&amp;#8221; So in political terms, a reform is a change for the better. But whether a particular policy change would actually improve things is often controversial. Unfortunately, the mainstream media typically use the word &amp;#8220;reform&amp;#8221; to mean &amp;#8220;change in a liberal direction.&amp;#8221;
It&amp;#8217;s bad enough that they constantly use the phrase &amp;#8220;campaign finance reform&amp;#8221; to re...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2858619</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:51:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2858619</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Glorious golfing experience</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2793116&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34469&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.medrants.com%2Farchives%2F4847</link>
            <description>Almost home after 4 days of glorious golf at Bandon Dunes on the Oregon coast. Vacations often induce great expectations. The higher the expectations, the less likely that they are met. But this golfing experience exceeded my incredibly high expectations.
Currently the resort has 3 courses and 10 holes open on the 4th (opening completely in March). We did not play the partial course, but played 5 rounds on the 3 courses. I liked Pacific Dunes the best (played it first and last). 
What made this so special is that the only reason to go to the resort is to play golf! The resort is designed for golfers. We had 4 bedroom suites so each person had their own bed and bath. Transportation at the resort was easy to order and prompt.
These are walking courses. We played with caddies the entire time....</description>
            <author>DB's Medical Rants</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2793116</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:14:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2793116</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Addicted to “A Strange Arrangement”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2761818&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34469&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.medrants.com%2Farchives%2F4824</link>
            <description>This post has nothing to do with medicine. Tonight I am writing about music.
One of my greatest pleasures is finding a new artist who infects me. I remember the week I discovered Nick Drake, and could not listen to anything else. Few CDs have that infectious quality. Mayer Hawthorne&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;A Strange Arrangement&amp;#8221; has me obsessed.
Mayer (not his real name) channels 60s and 70s soul, and makes it his own. You hear the influences, yet you hear something brand new.
My son, he of the great musical taste, clued me in on Monday. He provided these YouTube links:
Just ain&amp;#8217;t gonna work out
Maybe so Maybe no 
I wish it would rain
If you do not love this music, then we have different musical taste. I read a couple of reviews that criticized the voice and tried to map each song to pa...</description>
            <author>DB's Medical Rants</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2761818</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:10:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2761818</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Coping With Conflict and Criticism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2691802&amp;cid=t_270706_180_f&amp;fid=38619&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FALifeCoachsBlog%2F%7E3%2F1b5GiveQK4c%2F</link>
            <description>I received from a phone call from a client about 6 months ago, that started like this:
&amp;#8220;You whiny little prick, who the f. do you think you are?”
I listened fascinated by the stream of vitriol that then spewed forth from the guys mouth for the next couple of minutes. It was worth it though because I learned some juicy new colloquialisms that I can no doubt use myself when a suitable time arises.
I’ll not go into all the gory the details of why the person concerned was so upset, other than to say he hired me because he had accountability issues. He then failed to show for our second session and when I e-mailed him to say he wouldn’t get another opportunity, he took exception.
A minute or so into the conversation the guy paused. I’m not sure if it was to check his Profanisaurus...</description>
            <author>Life Coach Blog: The Discomfort Zone :</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2691802</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:50:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2691802</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Video: Learning to Blow Bubbles</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2405419&amp;cid=t_270706_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F05%2F11%2Fvideo-learning-to-blow-bubbles%2F</link>
            <description>Sticks and stones may break my bones, but bubbles can never hurt me. So I put all the meannies &amp;#8212; or at least their words &amp;#8212; in bubbles, where they can&amp;#8217;t bother me. Of course, I&amp;#8217;m so sensitive that I went out and got myself a gazillion bubbles. You&amp;#8217;ll see. Click through to view the video&amp;#8230; (Source: World of Psychology)</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2405419</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:00:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2405419</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Do social scientists dream about biomedical futures? Or do they have nightmares only?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2312712&amp;cid=t_270706_107_f&amp;fid=34860&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.corporeality.net%2Fmuseion%2F2009%2F03%2F29%2Fdo-social-scientists-dream-about-biomedical-futures-or-do-they-have-nightmares-only%2F</link>
            <description>In an interview for the Danish daily Information about his new book The Politics of Climate Change &amp;#8212; which is scheduled for publication in May, with laudatory pre-blurbs by Martin Rees, Ulrich Bech and Bill Clinton on Amazon.com &amp;#8212; British sociologist Anthony Giddens reminds us that Martin Luther King famously said &amp;#8216;I have a dream&amp;#8217;, not &amp;#8216;I have a nightmare&amp;#8217;. In other words: dystopian thinking is not a good basis for political action.
I guess he&amp;#8217;s basically right. There is much that supports the idea that climate policy changes will be served better by what Giddens (1990) called &amp;#8216;realistic utopianism&amp;#8217; than by fear scenarios (even though critical and negative scenarios sometimes are necessary stepping stones towards more po...</description>
            <author>Biomedicine on Display</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2312712</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:00:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2312712</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Should I Have Mentioned That Bush Dared to Call Human Embryos &quot;Human Life?&quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2256069&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34825&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wesleyjsmith.com%2Fblog%2F2009%2F03%2Fshould-i-have-mentioned-that-bush-dared.html</link>
            <description>I am applauded and criticized for my comments about President Obama's rescission of the Bush &quot;alternative method&quot; executive order over at Belief Net--from the version of the criticism I posted on the First Things blog, which contained slightly different language than I put here on the same topic. Thus, David Gibson wrote:Why didn't Obama say more about the promise of adult stem cells--and do something to promote that promise? He said that the administration will support &quot;promising research of all kinds, including groundbreaking work to convert ordinary human cells into ones that resemble embryonic stem cells.&quot; And yet his executive order yesterday also revoked Executive Order 13435 of June 20, 2007, which provided federal backing for promising adult stem cell research. At First Things, Wes...</description>
            <author>Secondhand Smoke</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2256069</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2256069</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>LBC, MMR, Jeni Barnett, an Early Day Motion, the Times, and, er, a bit of Stephen Fry…</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2172866&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F2009%2F02%2Flbc-mmr-jeni-barnett-an-early-day-motion-the-times-and-er-a-bit-of-stephen-fry%2F</link>
            <description>I thought since a few days have passed that I should let you know what&amp;#8217;s happening with the slightly ridiculous LBC situation. If you skip to the bottom you will find a discussion on some mischievous activism which I think has great potential.
Since LBC unwisely threw their legal weight around to prevent you from being [...] (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2172866</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:48:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2172866</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Er, “help”. Legal Chill from LBC 97.3 and “Global Radio” over Jeni Barnett’s MMR scaremongering</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2167524&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F2009%2F02%2Flegal-chill-from-lbc-973-over-jeni-barnetts-mmr-scaremongering%2F</link>
            <description>[Update: links to transcripts and audio hosted elsewhere at bottom of post]
LBC have instructed their lawyers to contact me.
Two days ago I posted about a 7th Jan 2009 broadcast in which their presenter Jeni Barnett exemplified some of the most irresponsible, ill-informed, and ignorant anti-vaccination campaigning that I have ever heard on the public airwaves. [...] (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2167524</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:32:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2167524</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Media recommendations updated</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2060527&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34469&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.medrants.com%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F4009</link>
            <description>&amp;nbsp;
I&amp;nbsp;am slow updating my media recommendations.&amp;nbsp; This weekend I took some time to consider the music I am listening to, the books I have read (or listened to) and the movies I admired.
Music

Veneer - Jose Gonzalez
In our nature - Jose Gonzalez
Time without consequence - Alexi Murdoch
Narrow Stairs - Death Cab for Cutie
Dear Science - TV on the Radio

I&amp;nbsp;am entranced by Jose Gonzalez.&amp;nbsp; His music is lovely, his guitar work sublime, his voice enchanting.
If you like Nick Drake, try out Alexi Murdoch.
Movies

Slumdog Millionaire
Milk
The Dark Knight
Burn after Reading
Munnabhai MBBS (a Bollywood movie from 2003)

I saw Slumdog Millionaire this weekend.&amp;nbsp; The movies combines a disturbing view of Indian poverty with a tale of love and hope.&amp;nbsp; The movie is beautifu...</description>
            <author>DB's Medical Rants</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2060527</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:24:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2060527</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Silence Dissent!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1692126&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F2008%2F08%2Fsilence-dissent%2F</link>
            <description>The CAM world meets a new all time low this week - even by their own standards - as the New Zealand Chiropractors Association threaten the New Zealand Medical Journal with legal action for criticising their ideas and practice. (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1692126</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:55:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1692126</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stools and Bottles</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1366959&amp;cid=t_270706_151_f&amp;fid=35818&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Frecoveryissexy.com%2Fstools-and-bottles%2F</link>
            <description>The booklet Stools and Bottles uses the concept of a barstool (the seat and three legs) and eight bottles to represent the importance of the first four steps (of the Twelve Steps) of Alcoholics Anonymous. 
The author began using this concept in a prior book called The Little Red Book and it got so popular that the concept was expanded into its own book. 
The Stool 
The author begins the book by talking about the “seat” of the stool. The seat, by itself, is “as useless, incomplete, and undependable as the shaky alcoholic it upholds”. For the seat to function, it needs three legs to uphold it, just like the alcoholic needs the first three steps of Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.) for support. The author says that the three legs represent the physical, mental, and spiritual aspects of reco...</description>
            <author>Recovery Is Sexy.com</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1366959</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:48:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1366959</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stop! Wait! Toxins at Work!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1240255&amp;cid=t_270706_109_f&amp;fid=35677&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FBrainBasedBusiness%2F%7E3%2F237288134%2Fstop_wait_toxins_at_work.html</link>
            <description>Over time you may have stopped noticing those things said or done that damage morale or pick away at productivity where you work. If toxins taint your organization &amp;hellip; you are not alone. According to The Conference Board &amp;hellip; more than 50 percent of workers are dissatisfied at their jobs. Even more of the 20-something-year-olds dislike where they work. A full eight out of ten workers don&amp;rsquo;t see themselves at the same workplace ten years from now. &amp;nbsp;Over 25 years of working with leaders &amp;hellip; I&amp;rsquo;ve often observed far too many people who settle for toxins as fair exchange for a salary that pays the mortgage. It doesn&amp;rsquo;t have to be that way. Research by Cooper now allows people to rate their own job satisfaction by rating 22 items as honestly as you can &amp;hellip;...</description>
            <author>BrainBasedBusiness</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1240255</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:29:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1240255</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Eli Stone: ABC Drama premieres misleading program linking vaccines and autism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1191604&amp;cid=t_270706_117_f&amp;fid=36026&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.healthtalk.com%2Fzimney%2Feli-stone-abc-drama-premieres-misleading-program-linking-vaccines-and-autism%2F</link>
            <description>In a move that has already ignited a firestorm of criticism from doctors&amp;#8217; groups, ABC still plans to premiere its new legal drama “Eli Stone” tonight (January 31, 2008) in which a mother, whose child allegedly developed autism after receiving a mercury-containing vaccine, wins a $5.2 million dollar lawsuit against a fictional drug company. The show’s premise is based on a long-standing belief held by childhood immunization critics that thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative, formerly used in vaccines, is a primary cause of autism in children.
There are just two basic problems with this. First, countless medical studies have failed to show any link between vaccination and autism. But let’s say you don’t care about scientific studies or just don’t believe them. Well, the ...</description>
            <author>Dr. Z's Medical Report</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1191604</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:39:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1191604</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Oddments</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1088788&amp;cid=t_270706_88_f&amp;fid=35612&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheknifeman.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F12%2Foddments.html</link>
            <description>A multi-post. I had several good ideas on the way home, again; once again, I appear to have left them on the motorway.Last night was an odd one. Most Docs and Nurses were living it up at the ED Xmas do. Not me, obviously. The gremlins seemed determined to make the most of our discomfort, and so, for reasons I still do not understand, the temperature in the Dept fell steadily to a nice round 16 degrees (Celsius); or maybe it was 14. The corridors were lovely, toasty warm. But the treatment areas? Cold enough to freeze the balls off a brass monkey.(Bonus points for any of my dear readers who can suggest the origin of this expression...)I also began to suspect someone was playing silly buggers with the nitrous, as everyone spent more time than usual giggling. Or maybe I just had something on ...</description>
            <author>The KnifeMan</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1088788</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:56:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1088788</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On a completely different note</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=979080&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34469&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.medrants.com%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F3374</link>
            <description>Today I am departing from my usual blogging and focusing solely on criticism. I will address music, movies and books and hopefully stimulate some modest discussion.
Music
Despite my age, I still listen to new rock music. Today I will comment on two bands that current have captured my focus - Radiohead and Spoon.
The new [...] (Source: DB's Medical Rants)</description>
            <author>DB's Medical Rants</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=979080</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:07:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">979080</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Appendix: Andy’s incredibly polite email to the Society of Homeopaths</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=966706&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D554</link>
            <description>To my mind this is one of the most important parts of the story about the Society of Homeopaths bullying its critics: it&amp;#8217;s the incredibly polite and courteous email that Dr Andy Lewis sent to the SoH after his hosting company received the first threatening letter from their solicitors. (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=966706</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:10:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">966706</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A corporate conspiracy to silence alternative medicine?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=965187&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D553</link>
            <description>Ben Goldacre
The Guardian
Saturday October 20 2007
Ben Goldacre
The Guardian
Saturday October 20 2007
Let’s imagine that we live in an exotic parallel universe where I am able to use an amusing but trivial news event to illustrate a wider cultural and intellectual issue. Dr Andy Lewis runs a website called Quackometer: he criticised the Society of Homeopaths (Europe [...] (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=965187</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:22:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">965187</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A startling lack of critical self-appraisal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=762965&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D475</link>
            <description>One for the small print maybe, but I think this is culturally quite interesting, because to me it tells a small part of the story on how you can maintain a belief system by avoiding appraisal of your ideas.
As you will remember, Craig Sams, a confectionery millionaire, recently wrote an article which I suppose I&amp;#8217;d [...] (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=762965</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:50:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">762965</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stifling Debate - When Bloggers Attack</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=674850&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D437</link>
            <description>Ben Goldacre
Saturday June 16, 2007
The Guardian
	I like short stories with happy endings. Last week we saw how the mightily eminent pharmacologist Professor David Colquhoun (FRS) was having his witty and informative &amp;#8220;Improbable Science&amp;#8221; quackbusting blog quietly banished from the UCL servers. 
	He had questioned claims made by a herbal medicine practitioner called Dr Ann [...] (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=674850</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:37:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">674850</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Mighty David Colquhoun</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=674854&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D431</link>
            <description>[Update: Letter from Provost below]
	Ben Goldacre
Saturday June 9, 2007
The Guardian
	I&amp;#8217;ve always said you&amp;#8217;d get a lot more kids interested in science if you told them it involves fighting - which of course it does. This week, for example, Professor David Colquhoun FRS - one of the most eminent scientists in the UK - has been [...] (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=674854</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:13:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">674854</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dr George Carlo responds to Andrew Goldacre</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=674855&amp;cid=t_270706_87_f&amp;fid=34591&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.badscience.net%2F%3Fp%3D430</link>
            <description>This post is only if you&amp;#8217;re not bored of the rather trying electrosensitivity lobby. Here is a letter which has popped up all over the interweb, I assume it is genuinely from Dr Carlo, who is hawked about as a rather eminent figure, and not a fake created in an effort to smear him.

	 [...] (Source: badscience)</description>
            <author>badscience</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=674855</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:46:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">674855</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>F.e.a.r</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=624483&amp;cid=t_270706_88_f&amp;fid=35612&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheknifeman.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F04%2Ffear.html</link>
            <description>Dropping the BallWhen something doesn't go according to plan, it's usually a system failure. There are rare occasions when someone pulls off an act of sheer banditry that couldn't be anticipated or mitigated by anyone else. But mostly, everyone fucks up a bit. I'm guessing most people feel the same way I do about this - everyone makes mistakes, but we rarely like to admit / talk about it. Mistakes in medicine are always a little bit higher stakes than in other jobs. --------------------------Personally, I've made my share of errors; I've learned from all of them, but the rude fact of life is that shit still goes wrong. Generally, I've got tickets on myself. I reckon I'm good at what I do, so when it turns out I haven't done it to my best ability, I feel shit about myself for days. ---I gue...</description>
            <author>The KnifeMan</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=624483</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:12:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">624483</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

