<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: data curation</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'data curation'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22data+curation%22&t=%22data+curation%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:00:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Content, Syntax and Semantics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2382689&amp;cid=t_164117_132_f&amp;fid=35016&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeanutbutter.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F05%2F02%2Fcontent-syntax-and-semantics%2F</link>
            <description>These are the slides I gave at a DCC workshop entitled, &amp;#8220;Digital curation 101&amp;#8243; which aimed to give and overview of what to consider regarding data curation and management in the context of applying for research funding. The presentation starts with definitions of content syntax and semantics, and example of how these concepts are being applied in the life-sciences, specifically proteomics. (Source: peanutbutter)</description>
            <author>peanutbutter</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2382689</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 09:05:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2382689</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Adding informative metadata to bioinformatics services</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2033141&amp;cid=t_164117_132_f&amp;fid=35028&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flurena.vox.com%2Flibrary%2Fpost%2Fadding-informative-metadata-to-bioinformatics-services.html%3F_c%3Dfeed-rss</link>
            <description>[This post has also been copied across to my researchblogging-friendly wordpress site (now completely defunct except for my research blogging efforts, as Vox doesn't play nicely with their aggregator software)].   Carole Goble and the other auth...   
  Read and post comments  |  
  Send to a friend (Source: Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics)</description>
            <author>Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2033141</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:22:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2033141</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Data, models, or both?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1677469&amp;cid=t_164117_107_f&amp;fid=36698&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fminingdrugs.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F08%2Fdata-models-or-both.html</link>
            <description>Correlation supersedes causation, and science can advance even without coherent models, unified theories, or really any mechanistic explanation at all. [C. Anderson, Wired, 2008-07-16]First, I disagree with this statement. Second, thanks to bioinfoman3@delicious for sharing this information.Honestly, I do not get it, why are people claiming that the scientific community, e.g. drug design, is similar to the chip industry or google concepts. Here, Chris Anderson claimed that data alone will replace theoretic concepts. As said by others, in the comments to his article, is data alone not information. Amund Tveit confirms this by showing that data correlations alone might be misleading, because you can find correlations in everything, even if it makes no sense. Data means any data, so if you lo...</description>
            <author>Mining Drug Space</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1677469</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:01:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1677469</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>SuperTarget, Matador, ChemSpider: When data curation becomes a hype</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1147428&amp;cid=t_164117_107_f&amp;fid=36698&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fminingdrugs.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F10%2Fsupertarget-matador-chemspider-when.html</link>
            <description>Although the first version of SuperTarget with all the search and discovery tools around drug-target relations is already an extensive resource for both large-scale research and in depth analysis, the captured knowledge is still far from complete and we would like to invite the community to help in increasing quality and quantity of the records. SuperTarget offers an option to upload and incorporate drug-target relations into a working queue. Uploaded entries will be reviewed and approved by an annotation team comprised of graduated scientists. Both SuperTarget and Matador can be used as knowledge sources, discovery tools or training sets for various applications in chemical biology and elsewhere. [DOI 10.1093/nar/gkm862]Dear community, as already highlighted earlier is it a logical step t...</description>
            <author>Mining Drug Space</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1147428</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:50:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1147428</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

