<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: diagnostic imaging</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'diagnostic imaging'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22diagnostic+imaging%22&t=%22diagnostic+imaging%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:40:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Approves GE’s Newest CT Scanner</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5130744&amp;cid=t_190915_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Ffda-approves-ges-newest-ct-scanner%2F2011.08.15</link>
            <description>GE Healthcare has received the FDA OK for its Optima CT660 computed tomography (CT) system. The CT660, which is already available in Europe, Latin America and Asia, distinguishes itself by its compact footprint combined with a modular design and low dose imaging. In addition, it is also one of the most energy efficient CT scanners available and has an “environmental design” that eases refurbishment and end-of-life recycling. The scanner itself is scalable from 32 to 128 slices through purchasable options and features automatic table positioning and a color 12-inch integrated gantry display monitor. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Medgadget* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5130744</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:05:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5130744</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>3D Water Bath Ultrasound: Next Generation in Cancer Imaging</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4841687&amp;cid=t_190915_113_f&amp;fid=39278&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogsite.mdbuyline.com%2F%3Fp%3D265</link>
            <description>You have to be pretty excited that 3D mammography was just approved, but the good news does not stop there.  A unique 3D ultrasound technology is also in the FDA approval process.  Screening mammography has been the gold standard for detecting breast cancer for 30 years.  Still, the technology has a false positive rate ranging from 5.5% to 7.4%.  Because of this, patients are referred to ultrasound then MRI to rule out cancer before a biopsy is performed.
Warm Bath Ultrasound (WBU) is a new technology designed to produce 3D breast images in less than 10 minutes. It’s based on placing the breast in a warm water bath surrounded by multiple ultrasound transducers, allowing near instantaneous tomographic imaging of the tissue. 
Although limited as a screening tool, ultrasound has proven...</description>
            <author>MD Buyline</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4841687</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 14:06:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4841687</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Identifying Skin Cancer With Light</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4560270&amp;cid=t_190915_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fidentifying-skin-cancer-with-light%2F2011.03.08</link>
            <description>Duke University scientists have been successfully testing a new laser system they developed to identify cancerous skin moles. Two lasers in the system are used to identify the presence of eumelanin in biopsy slices and a future version of the device may work directly without having to sample the mole. According to an article in Science Translational Medicine, &amp;#8220;the ratio of eumelanin to pheomelanin captured all investigated melanomas but excluded three-quarters of dysplastic nevi and all benign dermal nevi.&amp;#8221; From the press release:
The tool probes skin cells using two lasers to pump small amounts of energy, less than that of a laser pointer, into a suspicious mole. Scientists analyze the way the energy redistributes in the skin cells to pinpoint the microscopic locations of diff...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4560270</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:00:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4560270</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Experienced Is The Radiologist Who Reads Your Mammogram?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4532213&amp;cid=t_190915_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fhow-experienced-is-the-radiologist-who-reads-your-mammogram%2F2011.02.28</link>
            <description>There’s a new study out on mammography with important implications for breast cancer screening. The main result is that when radiologists review more mammograms per year, the rate of false positives declines.
The stated purpose of the research*, published in the journal Radiology, was to see how radiologists’ interpretive volume &amp;#8212; essentially the number of mammograms read per year &amp;#8212; affects their performance in breast cancer screening. The investigators collected data from six registries participating in the NCI’s Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, involving 120 radiologists who interpreted 783,965 screening mammograms from 2002 to 2006. So it was a big study, at least in terms of the number of images and outcomes assessed.
First &amp;#8212; and before reaching any concl...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4532213</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:00:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4532213</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MRI-Safe Pacemakers Available In U.S. Hospitals Soon: What It Means For Heart Patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4495203&amp;cid=t_190915_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fmri-safe-pacemakers-available-in-u-s-hospitals-soon-what-it-means-for-heart-patients%2F2011.02.18</link>
            <description>This was the Guest Blog at Scientific American on February 16th, 2011.
New wave of MRI-safe pacemakers set to ship to hospitals
This week Medtronic will begin shipping to hospitals in the United States the first pacemaker approved by the FDA as safe for most MRI scans. For consumers, it is a significant step in what is expected to be a wave of new MRI-compatible implanted cardiac devices.
But this is an example of one technology chasing another and the one being chased, the MRI scanner, is changing and is a step ahead of the new line of pacemakers. The pacemaker approved for U.S. distribution is Medtronic’s first-generation pacemaker with certain limitations, while its second-generation MRI-compatible pacemaker is already in use in Europe where approval for medical devices is not as dem...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4495203</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4495203</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Should Doctors Be Allowed To Self-Refer?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4372047&amp;cid=t_190915_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fshould-doctors-be-allowed-to-self-refer%2F2011.01.19</link>
            <description>Federal law generally prohibits physicians from referring their own patients to a diagnostic facility in which they have an ownership issue &amp;#8212; a practice called “self-referral” &amp;#8212; unless the facility is located in their own practice. This exemption exists to allow patients with access to a laboratory test, X-ray, or other imaging test at the same time and place as when patients are seeing their physician for an office visit. Less inconvenience and speeder diagnosis and treatment &amp;#8212; what could be wrong with that?
Much, say the critics, if it leads to overutilization and higher costs and doesn’t really represent a convenience to patients. This is the gist of two studies by staff employed by the American College of Radiology, published in the December issue of Health Affa...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4372047</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4372047</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>OIG: Imaging pre-authorization may be handled by hospital for referring docs and patients</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3942881&amp;cid=t_190915_114_f&amp;fid=34648&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FHealthBlawg%2F%7E3%2FkWg4LfO-GBo%2Foig-imaging-preauthorization-may-be-handled-by-hospital-for-referring-docs-and-patients.html</link>
            <description>The OIG released an advisory opinion at the end of last month OK'ing a hospital's proposal to provide insurance pre-authorization srevices free of charge to patients and physicians.  This is an issue that has long vexed folks in the imaging world.  Clearly, this is a free service provided to referral sources (to the extent they are obligated by contract with third party payors to obtain the pre-authorization before referring a patient for an MRI, for example), so why is the OIG OK with it?  In the opinion, the OIG blesses the arrangement for four reasons:


The arrangement doesn't target specific referring docs, so the pre-authorization service will be provided for patients of docs who are contractually bound to handle it themselves, as well as for patients of those who aren't, and t...</description>
            <author>HealthBlawg :: David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3942881</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:17:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3942881</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Actively Monitoring Medical And Healthcare Apps</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3929234&amp;cid=t_190915_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Ffda-actively-monitoring-medical-and-healthcare-apps%2F2010.09.02</link>
            <description>Bradley Merrill Thompson, an attorney with expertise in the FDA approval process for medical devices, is stating that the FDA is actively monitoring app stores on various platforms. Regulating medical devices and health care-related applications falls under the FDA’s jurisdiction.
James Kendrick from JkOnTheRun spoke with Thompson, where he stated the following:
The FDA is actively engaged in surveillance of various app stores to see if apps should trigger their involvement. Applications where a smartphone is connected in any way to imaging are under scrutiny, in particular. Any app that is used to transmit images to a medical facility requires FDA approval.
By “various app stores,” Thompson is likely referring to the App store [Apple], Palm App Catalog [Web OS], App World [BlackBe...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3929234</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:00:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3929234</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Doctors In Cubicles: A Barrier To Patient Care</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3876650&amp;cid=t_190915_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fdoctors-in-cubicles-a-barrier-to-patient-care%2F2010.08.17</link>
            <description>I present interesting cases to colleagues often because it&amp;#8217;s educational and good for patient care and because I like to. But it has been many years since I was mandated to present a case.
It seems that I&amp;#8217;m not the only doctor exasperated by a pesky new barrier to patient care: Doctors in cubicles.
An old friend and mentor, Dr. Richard Kovacs, now chair of the American College of Cardiology&amp;#8217;s Board of Governors (and IU guy), has written about these same pre-certification barriers. Dr. Kovacs, being a professor and distinguished ACC official, kindly terms these obstructionists &amp;#8220;radiology benefit managers&amp;#8221; (RBMs). (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Dr John M* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3876650</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3876650</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Healthymagination VP Mike Barber speaks with David Harlow about GE's investment in health care and health care improvement</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3679828&amp;cid=t_190915_114_f&amp;fid=34648&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthblawg.typepad.com%2Ffiles%2Fmike-barber-interview-w-david-harlow-on-healthblawg-062010.mp3</link>
            <description>What if you could improve health care across the three intransigent parameters of cost, access and quality by 15%?  That's the challenge GE has set out for itself in the form of its current five-year Healthymagination campaign, and it's investing $6 billion in the effort.  I caught up with GE's VP for Healthymagination, Mike Barber, recently, and I invite you to listen in on our conversation about GE's efforts in the US and globally, within GE's health care business unit and beyond, to roll out this major investment -- which, obviously, GE expects to yield a return in the future.The audio file of my interview with Mike Barber (about 20
 minutes long) is available for listening or download:  



A full 
transcript is at the end of this post (and in the linked Mike Barber, VP, Healt...</description>
            <author>HealthBlawg :: David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3679828</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:07:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3679828</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA takes it up a notch: A fresh look at radiation emitting equipment regulation, and what about EHRs?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3490728&amp;cid=t_190915_114_f&amp;fid=34648&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FHealthBlawg%2F%7E3%2FN0rw9xKpgWg%2Ffda-radiation-therapy-emitting-equipment-regulation-ehr-device.html</link>
            <description>Earlier this month, the FDA released a letter announcing a new focus on radiation-emitting products.  Here's the core of the letter:In order to reduce the number of under-doses, over-doses, and misaligned exposures from therapeutic radiation the FDA is taking several steps to improve the safety and safe use of certain radiation therapy devices. Analyses of Medical Device Reports (MDRs) revealed device problems that appear to be the result of faulty design or use error that could be mitigated by the incorporation of additional safeguards. Between December 31, 1999, and February 18, 2010, FDA received 1,182 MDRs associated with the use of radiation therapy devices. Of these MDRs, linear accelerators accounted for 74%, radiation therapy treatment planning systems (RTP) accounted for 19%, and...</description>
            <author>HealthBlawg :: David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3490728</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:59:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3490728</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Diagnostic Radiology Controls: David Harlow Interviews MITA Executive Director Dave Fischer</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3318495&amp;cid=t_190915_114_f&amp;fid=34648&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthblawg.typepad.com%2FDave%2520Fischer%2520MITA%2520HealthBlawg%2520Interview%2520with%2520David%2520Harlow%2520022510.mp3</link>
            <description>MITA Executive Director Dave Fischer spoke with HealthBlawg last week about industry efforts to control radiation dose in diagnostic radiology modalities such as CT.  

A congressional hearing on radiation dose control took place the day after we spoke, and the FDA will be holding a hearing on diagnostic radiology issues in late March.  Earlier last week, timed in part perhaps because of the upcomng congressional committee hearing, MITA kicked off the dose check initiative, a tool for manufacturers and providers to use in better regulating diagnostic imaging radiation dose, which Dave Fischer describes in our interview.  He also referred to the CMS demonstration project on appropriateness of imaging services now underway, authorized by MIPPA.   

It now seems surprising that there ...</description>
            <author>HealthBlawg :: David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3318495</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:39:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3318495</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Myth of Prevention and EHRs?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2570668&amp;cid=t_190915_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fmyth-prevention-and-ehrs</link>
            <description>I was just referred this article which I found to be thoughtfully crafted. Abraham Verghese is a Professor and Senior Associate Chair for the Theory and Practice of Medicine at Stanford University. I found the article interesting, by somewhat anachronistic in terms of his perception of prevention and electronic medical records. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2570668</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:24:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2570668</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Medicare Expands Coverage of PET Scans as Cancer Diagnostic Tool</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2326618&amp;cid=t_190915_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F04%2F07%2Fmedicare-expands-coverage-of-pet-scans-as-cancer-diagnostic-tool%2F</link>
            <description>&amp;#8220;The Centers for Medicare &amp;#38; Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final national coverage determination (NCD) to expand coverage for initial testing with positron emission tomography (PET) for Medicare beneficiaries who are diagnosed with and treated for most solid tumor cancers.  This decision applies to PET scans used to support initial diagnosis and treatment for most [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2326618</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:36:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2326618</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

