<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: dietary supplement</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'dietary supplement'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22dietary+supplement%22&t=%22dietary+supplement%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:02:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Testimonials Aren’t Real Evidence</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4304917&amp;cid=t_282471_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F01%2F03%2Ftestimonials-arent-real-evidence%2F</link>
            <description>Testimonial evidence exists for pretty much any claim that has ever been devised &amp;#8212; alien abductions, demon possessions, miracle medical cures and the like.
One needs to look no further than the dietary supplement industry to see the influence of testimonials.  In fact, testimonials are probably the key marketing tool for the supplement industry.  Medicine, psychology, and the beauty industry, to name a few, often refer to testimonials in an effort to show the efficacy of their products or treatments.  It is not uncommon for people to make decisions based on testimonials that conflict with scientific evidence &amp;#8212; giving more weight to the testimonial.
This is a mistake because testimonials are not real evidence.

Placebo Effect
&amp;#8220;Placebo&amp;#8221; is derived from a Latin word...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4304917</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:59:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4304917</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Book Review: The Mayo Clinic Book Of Home Remedies</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4040565&amp;cid=t_282471_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fbook-review-the-mayo-clinic-book-of-home-remedies%2F2010.10.07</link>
            <description>I write a lot of critical articles. It’s nice to be able to write a positive one for a change. I received a prepublication proof of The Mayo Clinic Book of Home Remedies: What to Do for the Most Common Health Problems. It is due to be released on October 26 and can be pre-ordered from Amazon.com. Since “quackademic” medicine is infiltrating our best institutions and organizations, I wasn’t sure I could trust even the prestigious Mayo Clinic. I was expecting some questionable recommendations for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments, but I found nothing in the book that I could seriously object to.
It is organized alphabetically, starting with acne and airplane ear and progressing through bedbugs, boils and bronchitis, dandruff, depression and diabetes to warts, w...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4040565</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:00:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4040565</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How FDA Warnings &amp; DTC Advertising Increase Sales of Sexual Enhancement Dietary Supplements</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4031500&amp;cid=t_282471_150_f&amp;fid=34889&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpharmamkting.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F10%2Fhow-fda-warnings-dtc-advertising.html</link>
            <description>Here's an example of how the Internet and direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising empowers consumers.For several years now the FDA has been issuing warnings to consumers about &quot;dietary supplements&quot; that claim to enhance sexual performance or treat erectile dysfunction. According to the FDA, although it has issued &quot;many alerts about these types of supplements over the past several years, ... their number seems to be growing&quot; (see &quot;FDA Consumer Corner: Cautions about Sexual Enhancement Products&quot;).Using the Internet, FDA now has a much more direct line of communication to consumers. And consumers use the Internet to buy dietary supplements. This concerns drug companies and the FDA.What concerns the FDA about these products? FDA states:&quot;FDA has found that many of these supposedly 'all natural' pr...</description>
            <author>Pharma Marketing Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4031500</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4031500</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pregnant Women And Vitamin D</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3890478&amp;cid=t_282471_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fpregnant-women-and-vitamin-d%2F2010.08.21</link>
            <description>A new study in the American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology reports that low levels of vitamin D may be linked to early-onset preeclampsia in pregnant women.
The trial found that the average vitamin D level in 50 pregnant women with preeclampsia was 18 ng/mL, compared with 32 ng/mL in 100 women with healthy pregnancies. No casual relationship was proven, and the study&amp;#8217;s lead author told Reuters Health that the recommended vitamin D intake in pregnant women hasn&amp;#8217;t changed, but the study results raise yet more questions about this much-discussed nutrient.
ACP Internist covered the pros and cons of vitamin D in its November 2009 issue. (Reuters, ACP Internist)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at ACP Internist* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3890478</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3890478</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Warning: Industrial Bleach As A Cure For Cancer And HIV?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3862009&amp;cid=t_282471_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Ffda-warning-industrial-bleach-as-a-cure-for-cancer-and-hiv%2F2010.08.12</link>
            <description>On the heels of Scott Gavura’s superb post on dietary supplement regulation in the U.S. and Canada, I bring you one of the most egregious and obscene product cases I have seen in 15 years of teaching on botanical and non-botanical products: Miracle Mineral Solution. Please accept my apologies in advance for not having a scholarly post for you &amp;#8211; this is just too unbelievable not to share with science-based medicine readers. (more&amp;#8230;)

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Science-Based Medicine* (Source: Better Health)</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3862009</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:00:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3862009</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

