<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: dod</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'dod'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22dod%22&t=%22dod%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:02:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Debt Deal Signed, Fights over Military Spending Next</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5096169&amp;cid=t_207635_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FZOrZ812LqXk%2F</link>
            <description>By Benjamin H. FriedmanThe legislation signed by President Obama yesterday, as a solution to the debt ceiling debate, includes the possibility of cuts to military spending. But as Chris Preble points out, the legislation guarantees no defense cuts. Republicans will try to dump all the required cuts on non-defense areas. And the White House has already distanced itself from the prospect of any real defense budget cuts, as did Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. Both support only the first round of cuts, which will at best halt Pentagon growth at roughly inflation.
On The Skeptics blog, I take a more detailed look at deal&amp;#8217;s likely impact on military spending. I also examine its political effect, arguing that it will cause at least four political fights.
The first concerns war fun...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5096169</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 16:29:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5096169</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Pentagon’s Faux Cuts</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4477699&amp;cid=t_207635_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FTiVWVOvmBW8%2F</link>
            <description>By Christopher PreblePresident Obama might want it to appear as though he is reining in defense spending with his budget submission for FY 2012, but his approach to the Pentagon’s budget reveals the opposite.
Perhaps the president hopes that his adoption of the faux cuts that Secretary Gates put on the table last month will be seen as responsible. Perhaps he is taking a prudent first step and signaling to the military, and its suppliers and contractors, that the days of double-digit increases are over. That may be; but far deeper cuts are warranted. . If the president had truly wanted to send a signal, he would have followed the advice of his own deficit reduction commission and endorsed far deeper cuts in military spending.
The Department of Defense will spend $78 billion less over the ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4477699</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:48:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4477699</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Call To Action! Protect &amp; Expand U.S. Federal Ovarian Cancer Research Funding</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3925054&amp;cid=t_207635_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F09%2F01%2Fcall-to-action-protect-expand-u-s-federal-ovarian-cancer-research-funding%2F</link>
            <description>Do you live in AL, CA, HI, IL, IA, KS, KY, MD, MI, MO, NH, ND, PA, TX, UT, VT, WA or WI? If so, one of your Senators sits on the U.S. Senate Defense Appropriations subcommittee that determines how much funding is given to the Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program. Ask your [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3925054</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:42:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3925054</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>We Fail More—So Put Us in Charge</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3902887&amp;cid=t_207635_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F7cw2y1Jr3nI%2F</link>
            <description>The Washington Post reports today on an article coming out in Foreign Affairs in which Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III reveals a successful 2008 intrusion into military computer systems. Malicious code placed on a thumb drive by a foreign intelligence agency uploaded itself onto a network run by the U.S. military&amp;#8217;s Central Command and propagated itself across a number of domains.
The Post article says that Lynn &amp;#8220;puts the Homeland Security Department on notice that although it has the &amp;#8216;lead&amp;#8217; in protecting the dot.gov and dot.com domains, the Pentagon &amp;#8212; which includes the ultra-secret National Security Agency &amp;#8212; should support efforts to protect critical industry networks.&amp;#8221;
The failure of the military to protect its own systems creat...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3902887</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3902887</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Much Is Enough?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3718383&amp;cid=t_207635_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F8z4V9g2yTDs%2F</link>
            <description>By Christopher PrebleIn yesterday&amp;#8217;s Daily Caller, I responded to an article questioning cuts in military spending. Although the author focuses on a few of the specifics proposals put forward by the Sustainable Defense Task Force (SDTF), he seems to imply that any cuts in a budget that has grown 86 percent since 1998 (in real terms) would undermine our security.
I was able to respond to his more outrageous claims, including his assertion that Barack Obama plans to cut $1 trillion from the Pentagon budget over the next ten years. In fact, Obama has now submitted two DoD budgets, each larger than the year before. We are spending more money (in real, inflation-adjusted dollars) on the military today than at any time since World War II.
One of the other assertions in an article riddled wi...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3718383</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:28:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3718383</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cognitive Assessments: HeadMinder, ANAM, and more</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1892347&amp;cid=t_207635_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F427061680%2F</link>
            <description>Just saw a very interesting press release regarding computer-based neurocognitive assessments - a critical part of the brain fitness puzzle. How long will it take before consumers can have access to a reliable and credible annual &amp;quot;mental check-up&amp;quot;/ cognitive baseline?
HeadMinder Cognitive Stability Index: Computerized Neurocognitive ... (Press release)
- &amp;quot;The HeadMinder web-based Cognitive Stability Index (CSI) has proven more useful for blast-concussion detection than the ANAM computerized test battery the DoD currently employs. The CSI provides an immediate solution to clear the backlog of 400,000 IED-exposed service members in less than two years.&amp;quot;
- &amp;quot;The CSI is a 30-minute, Internet-based, computerized test that provides automated, objective measures of attenti...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1892347</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:39:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1892347</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

