<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: dossia</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'dossia'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22dossia%22&t=%22dossia%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:49:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>“Meaningful Use” Criteria as a Unifying Force</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2699695&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2Fno1LFrhNDCM%2F</link>
            <description>by Vince Kuraitis, Steve Adams, and David C. Kibbe MD, MBA
Over the past several years, many diverse initiatives have arisen offering partial solutions to systemic problems in the U.S. health care non-system. 
We see Meaningful Use Criteria recommended by the HIT Policy Committee as a unifying force for these previously disparate initiatives. These initiatives have included:

Patient Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs)
Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs)/Health Information Exchanges (HIEs)
Payer Disease/Care Management Programs
Personal Health Record Platforms — Google Health, Microsoft HealthVault, Dossia, health banks, more to come
State/Regional Chronic Care Programs (e.g., Colorado, Pennsylvania, Improving Performance in Practice)
Accountable Care Organizations — the n...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2699695</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:41:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2699695</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Rise of the Personal Health Record</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2033029&amp;cid=t_114190_114_f&amp;fid=34646&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fsbwv.com%2Fpdf%2FThe_Rise_of_the_PHR_AHLA.pdf</link>
            <description>Conclusion
PHRs bring a new dimension to the debate over how to create an interoperable health information network. The shift of power into the hands of patients could bring about a sustainable model. Before proceeding with the expansion of PHRs, the legal implications that go along with such an adoption should be addressed.

Bob Coffield is a member of Flaherty, Sensabaugh &amp; Bonasso, PLLC in Charleston, West Virginia. Bob is also a Co-Chair of the Privacy and Security Compliance and Enforcement Affinity Group, a part of AHLA’s Health Information and Technology Practice Group.

Jud DeLoss is a principal with the law firm of Gray Plant Mooty in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Jud is also a Vice Chair of the AHLA’s Health Information and Technology Practice Group.

[1] Mr. DeLoss thanks Brya...</description>
            <author>Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2033029</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:42:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2033029</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Picturing the PHIN as One Interoperable Network</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1955389&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F451312919%2F</link>
            <description>Will the Microsoft HealthVault, Google Health, and Dossia personal health information (PHI) platforms be able to exchange data?  In our introductory essay announcing the Birth of the Personal Health Information Network (PHIN), Dr. David Kibbe and I posed a critical question: 
What will the PHIN look like?  Will there be multiple, non-interoperable, competing networks or just one interoperable network?
This question is being answered with the best possible answer:  the PHIN is evolving as one, interoperable network.
Consider 3 scenarios:
 

Scenario One: Status Quo — Your Personal Health Information Today


Scenario Two: The PHIN — Multiple, non-interoperable platforms


Scenario Three: The PHIN—Multiple, interoperable platforms


In this post, I’ll present  images of these ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1955389</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:16:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1955389</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Picturing the PHIN as One Interoperable Network</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2580318&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FlGsCUEjEK9k%2F</link>
            <description>Will the Microsoft HealthVault, Google Health, and Dossia personal health information (PHI) platforms be able to exchange data?  In our introductory essay announcing the Birth of the Personal Health Information Network (PHIN), Dr. David Kibbe and I posed a critical question: 
What will the PHIN look like?  Will there be multiple, non-interoperable, competing networks or just one interoperable network?

This question is being answered with the best possible answer:  the PHIN is evolving as one, interoperable network.
Consider 3 scenarios:
 

Scenario One: Status Quo — Your Personal Health Information Today


Scenario Two: The PHIN — Multiple, non-interoperable platforms


Scenario Three: The PHIN—Multiple, interoperable platforms


In this post, I’ll present  images of these...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2580318</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:26:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2580318</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Picturing the PHIN as One Interoperable Network</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2511434&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2FlGsCUEjEK9k%2F</link>
            <description>Will the Microsoft HealthVault, Google Health, and Dossia personal health information (PHI) platforms be able to exchange data?  In our introductory essay announcing the Birth of the Personal Health Information Network (PHIN), Dr. David Kibbe and I posed a critical question: 
What will the PHIN look like?  Will there be multiple, non-interoperable, competing networks or just one interoperable network?

This question is being answered with the best possible answer:  the PHIN is evolving as one, interoperable network.
Consider 3 scenarios:
 

Scenario One: Status Quo — Your Personal Health Information Today


Scenario Two: The PHIN — Multiple, non-interoperable platforms


Scenario Three: The PHIN—Multiple, interoperable platforms


In this post, I’ll present  images of these...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2511434</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:26:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2511434</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Rise of the Personal Health Record</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1888079&amp;cid=t_114190_114_f&amp;fid=34646&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthcarebloglaw.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F10%2Frise-of-personal-health-record.html</link>
            <description>ConclusionPHRs bring a new dimension to the debate over how to create an interoperable health information network. The shift of power into the hands of patients could bring about a sustainable model. Before proceeding with the expansion of PHRs, the legal implications that go along with such an adoption should be addressed.Bob Coffield is a member of Flaherty, Sensabaugh &amp; Bonasso, PLLC in Charleston, West Virginia. Bob is also a Co-Chair of the Privacy and Security Compliance and Enforcement Affinity Group, a part of AHLA’s Health Information and Technology Practice Group.Jud DeLoss is a principal with the law firm of Gray Plant Mooty in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Jud is also a Vice Chair of the AHLA’s Health Information and Technology Practice Group.[1] Mr. DeLoss thanks Bryan M. Se...</description>
            <author>Health Care Law Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1888079</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:40:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1888079</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Goldilocks: “Markle’s Framework for Networked Personal Health Information is Just Right”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1546873&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F320108332%2F</link>
            <description>By Vince Kuraitis and David C. Kibbe, MD, MBA
Once upon a time, there was a little girl named Goldilocks. Like most Americans, Goldilocks had concerns about achieving just the right amount of data liquidity for her personal health information (PHI).
Until today Goldilocks felt between a rock and a hard place:
&amp;quot;I want my PHI to be appropriately liquid &amp;#8212; just the right viscosity. My PHI should be viscous enough to flow to my trusted health care providers to use to improve my health and health care.
“Today my PHI is frozen and inaccessible &amp;#8212; it&amp;#8217;s too cold. 
“But I&amp;#8217;m worried about the other extreme &amp;#8212; the risks of using a personal health record (PHR). The privacy/security advocates tell me that I should be concerned about my PHI being too hot &amp;#8212; like ...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1546873</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:28:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1546873</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NEJM and NYT Discuss “Tectonic Shifts” of a Personal Health Information Economy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1378034&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F271808586%2F</link>
            <description>Vince Kuraitis and David C. Kibbe, MD MBA 
Tomorrow’s edition of the New England Journal of Medicine contains an article entitled “Tectonic Shifts in the Health Information Economy”.  While we have not yet fully digested this article, it’s clear that the authors’ description of the “Health Information Economy” closely parallels our initial description of the Personal Health Information Network (PHIN). 
The main thrust of the NEJM article is to discuss implications (good and bad) relating to clinical research. The NEJM article is also highlighted in a New York Times piece entitled “Warning on Storage of Health Records.”
In anticipation of our webinar tomorrow sponsored by Healthcare Informatics, we wanted to bring these articles to your attention ASAP. 
As a f...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1378034</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:52:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1378034</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Healthcare Informatics Webinar: Google, Microsoft, &amp; Dossia Create the Personal Health Information Network</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1362487&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=35744&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fe-CareManagement%2F%7E3%2F267383423%2F</link>
            <description>What are companies like Google, Microsoft, and Dossia (sponsored by Intel, Wal-Mart, AT&amp;T and others) hoping to accomplish in health care?
What is the emerging Personal Health Information Network (PHIN) and why should you care?
What&amp;#8217;s the Continuity of Care Record (CCR) Standard, and how is it destined to become an initial focal point of data exchange initiatives?
Why is the PHIN potentially disruptive to many business models? What types of companies or organizations could be affected the most?
What are opportunities and threats to major health care players &amp;#8212; hospitals, physicians, health plans, enterprise HIT vendors, ambulatory HIT vendors, and others?
What specific actions can you take to be a leader in advancing the PHIN and positioning your company for success?
...</description>
            <author>e-CareManagement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1362487</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:46:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1362487</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Another PHR story</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=781246&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalit.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F08%2Fanother-phr-story.html</link>
            <description>The last of my three features on personal health records has been published, in the August issue of Health Executive.So here are the links:&quot;Getting Personal.&quot; Health Executive, August 2007.&quot;PHRs—Popping Up Everywhere.&quot; For The Record, July 23, 2007.&quot;Google, then Gargle: America's sorry performance on personal health records could soon change.&quot; Red Herring, April 23, 2007.Unfortunately, the Health Executive story went to press one day before I found out about the legal dispute that threatens to derail Dossia. I got a last-minute change to For The Record before that issue closed.In case anyone was wondering if I'm going to do any more work for Red Herring, I'm still waiting for my check nearly five months after I submitted my invoice and almost four months after the article appeared in pri...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=781246</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">781246</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>My 'Red Herring' story</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=559122&amp;cid=t_114190_113_f&amp;fid=34625&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicalit.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F04%2Fmy-red-herring-story.html</link>
            <description>At long last, I have a copy of my story from the April 23 issue of Red Herring. I'll post a PDF version later for easy downloading and printing, but for now, here's the text.Google, then GargleAmerica’s sorry performance on personal health records could soon change.By Neil VerselWith names like GlobalPatientRecord, NoMoreClipboard, HealthKey, and HealthCard, the U.S. marketplace for electronic personal health records, so-called PHRs, is getting crowded. And yet the public has barely noticed that the era of people tracking their own medical history has arrived.Dr. David Kibbe, a former director of the Center for Health Information Technology of the American Academy of Family Physicians, estimates that perhaps 10 percent of adults in the United States will have access to PHRs by the end of...</description>
            <author>Neil Versel's Healthcare IT Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=559122</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 21:37:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">559122</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

