<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: dr margaret</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'dr margaret'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22dr+margaret%22&t=%22dr+margaret%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:00:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Medical Errors: Should Doctors Always Fess Up?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4355717&amp;cid=t_319858_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fmedical-errors-should-doctors-always-fess-up%2F2011.01.16</link>
            <description>From the Medscape Medical Ethics article entitled &amp;#8220;&amp;#8216;Some Worms Are Best Left In The Can&amp;#8217;: Should You Hide Medical Errors?&amp;#8220;:
Consequences aside, from a strictly ethical perspective, if a patient doesn’t realize that his physician made a mistake, should the physician fess up?
Before you jump to conclusions (as I did), look at the article’s three parts. It’s about a survey. The title is on the inflammatory side; the article is a window into physicians&amp;#8217; views. The introduction continues:
Evidence of the complex prisms through which physicians view these issues was apparent in the replies to four questions asked in Medscape’s exclusive ethics survey. More than 10,000 physicians responded to the survey in 2010.
Subheads:
&amp;#8211; Mistakes that don’t harm p...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4355717</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:00:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4355717</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Often Should Bone Density Testing Be Done?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4237894&amp;cid=t_319858_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fhow-often-should-bone-density-testing-be-done%2F2010.12.07</link>
            <description>Not as often as you think, even though Medicare may be willing to pay for it every two years. Via Science Daily:
Now a new study led by Margaret L. Gourlay, MD, MPH of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine finds that women aged 67 years and older with normal bone mineral density scores may not need screening again for 10 years.
“If a woman’s bone density at age 67 is very good, then she doesn’t need to be re-screened in two years or three years, because we’re not likely to see much change,” Gourlay said. “Our study found it would take about 16 years for 10 percent of women in the highest bone density ranges to develop osteoporosis. That was longer than we expected, and it’s great news for this group of women,” Gourlay said.
The researchers sug...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4237894</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:00:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4237894</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>WHO And H1N1: Conflict Of Interest?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671695&amp;cid=t_319858_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fwho-and-h1n1-conflict-of-interest%2F2010.06.17</link>
            <description>On June 11, 2009, Dr. Margaret Chan, the director general of the World Health Organization (WHO), declared that the H1N1 flu that was then spreading around the world was an official pandemic. This triggered a series of built-in responses in many countries, including stockpiling anti-viral medications and preparing for a mass H1N1 vaccination program.
At the time the flu was still in its “first wave” and the fear was that subsequent waves, as the virus swept around the world, would become more virulent and/or contagious –- similar to what happened in the 1918 pandemic. This did not happen. At least our worst fears were not realized. The H1N1 pandemic, while serious, simmered through the winter of 2009-2010, producing a less than average flu season, although with some worrisome differe...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671695</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:00:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671695</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>10 Ways to Bring Christmas Cheer to a Friend in the Hospital for the Holidays</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3118921&amp;cid=t_319858_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F12%2F24%2F10-ways-to-bring-christmas-cheer-to-a-friend-in-the-hospital-for-the-holidays%2F</link>
            <description>Disease and trauma do not take a holiday. Many of us have loved ones in the hospital for all kinds of reasons. We want to do what we can for them, our brothers, sisters, friends, parents, children, who find themselves in strange surroundings during this supposedly most joyous of times.
Fifteen years ago, a few weeks before Christmas, I was suddenly admitted to Women and Children&amp;#8217;s Hospital.
I was five months pregnant with my daughter and I was very sick. With my history of kidney disease and scleroderma, I chose a maternal-fetus specialist to be my OB-GYN. Trained in situations like mine, where the mother has chronic illness which makes the pregnancy high risk, I had every faith in Dr. Margaret McDonnell. My first pregnancy had gone off without so much as a cold. This time Margaret s...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3118921</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:37:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3118921</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Swine Flu Global Pandemic declared</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2473890&amp;cid=t_319858_131_f&amp;fid=34989&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FGeneticsHealth%2F%7E3%2Fiz7BsoGHRsU%2F</link>
            <description>In this ultra-modern, health-conscious world, one would not have thought this to happen. But the World Health Organization has just declared a swine flu pandemic has begun.
WHO declares Swine Flu Global Pandemic, 11 June 2009. Image: Newscom
Although the WHO declared the danger as “moderate severity”, the agency stressed that the threat of the H1N1 virus needs to be taken seriously, as “the virus is now unstoppable.”
The A(H1N1) virus is a combination of three viruses – human, swine and avian, and that made it particularly dangerous to humans as there is no immunity, nor vaccine (to date), to this strain.

UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES
As of June11, there are 28,774 people infected by the A(H1N1), and 144 have died. Most of those infected rapidly recovered, and did not need medical treat...</description>
            <author>Genetics and Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2473890</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:11:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2473890</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

