<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: dsm 5</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'dsm 5'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22dsm+5%22&t=%22dsm+5%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:53:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>British Psychological Society on DSM-5</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5062291&amp;cid=t_181743_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F07%2F25%2Fbps-on-dsm%2F</link>
            <description>Some of you may be following the development of the forthcoming fifth revision to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the major book used for psychiatric diagnosis. There has been a lot of criticism due to the secrecy of the process this time around, but the British Psychological Society (BPS), the major mental health organization in the UK, is taking an even more interesting and refreshing angle: criticizing the entire current framework of diagnosis.
The DSM takes a medical approach to diagnosis. In short, this means that a &amp;#8216;patient&amp;#8217; is assumed to have an underlying &amp;#8216;pathology&amp;#8217; that manifests as various &amp;#8216;symptoms&amp;#8217; that are assessed to make a &amp;#8216;diagnosis&amp;#8217; and then apply a &amp;#8216;treatment&amp;#8217; to said diagnosis. ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5062291</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:44:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5062291</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Does Schizophrenia Need a New Name?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4429059&amp;cid=t_181743_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F02%2F02%2Fdoes-schizophrenia-need-a-new-name%2F</link>
            <description>I was very nervous when my editorial about schizophrenia &amp;#8212; there we go, a word I ought not to be using &amp;#8212; appeared Open Access online in the December 2010 Journal of Mental Health (published by Informa Healthcare, New York). It contains personal details which it is not customary to reveal. Having got over that I had more anxiety when the printed journal was delayed by a month for unknown reasons. Now that it&amp;#8217;s out I am calm again.
Why should I not be using the ‘S’ word? What’s in a name?
The answer is that it has acquired a stigma in the course of a hundred years owing to the small minority of people with our condition who are violent and attack or kill other people.

Furthermore, according to Jim van Os, a professor of psychiatry at Maastricht University in the Neth...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4429059</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:13:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4429059</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Psychiatric Diagnosis And The DSM-5 Controversy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4355718&amp;cid=t_181743_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fpsychiatric-diagnosis-and-the-dsm-5-controversy%2F2011.01.16</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;ve followed in bits and pieces &amp;#8212; sometimes for Shrink Rap, sometimes because the issues fill my email inbox, sometimes because there&amp;#8217;s no escape. Oh, and lots of the players have familiar names.
In the December 27th issue of Wired magazine, Gary Greenberg writes a comprehensive article on the debates around the revision of the American Psychiatric Association&amp;#8217;s (APA) upcoming revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) entitled &amp;#8220;Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness.&amp;#8221; Do read it. Here&amp;#8217;s an excerpt:
I recently asked a former president of the APA how he used the DSM in his daily work. He told me his secretary had just asked him for a diagnosis on a patient he’d been seeing for a couple of months so that she could bill the insur...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4355718</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4355718</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Friday Flashback for December 17, 2010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4265857&amp;cid=t_181743_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F12%2F17%2Ffriday-flashback-for-december-17-2010%2F</link>
            <description>It&amp;#8217;s been awhile since I&amp;#8217;ve done one of these, but as we head into the holiday season, we slow down a bit here. So enjoy these great golden oldies from days of yore.
15 Years Ago on Psych Central
Seek Out Help
One of the first things I wrote for the website was an editorial piece about how you should nearly always seek out psychotherapy in addition to medications for treatment of mental health issues (which is even more true today than it was 15 years ago). And I announced a call for articles for a new online mental health magazine called Perspectives.

5 Years Ago on Psych Central
At trial, noted cardiologist criticizes Merck’s behavior
Talk about the &amp;#8220;tip of the iceberg.&amp;#8221; In this blog entry from December 2005, I noted how a cardiologist was calling out Merck for...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4265857</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:33:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4265857</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Narcissism: No Longer A Personality Disorder?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4219747&amp;cid=t_181743_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fnarcissism-no-longer-a-personality-disorder%2F2010.12.01</link>
            <description>Via an article in The New York Times entitled &amp;#8220;Narcissism No Longer a Psychiatric Disorder&amp;#8221;:
Narcissistic personality disorder, characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance and the need for constant attention, has been eliminated from the upcoming manual of mental disorders, which psychiatrists use to diagnose mental illness.
As Charles Zanor reports in today’s Science Times, the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders — due out in 2013 and known as D.S.M.-5 — has eliminated five of the 10 personality disorders that are listed in the current edition. The best known of these is narcissistic personality disorder.
So, blogging is normal then? Kinda takes the fun out of it…

			
			*This blog post was originally published at Gr...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4219747</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:00:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4219747</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Deconstructing DSM</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3808722&amp;cid=t_181743_111_f&amp;fid=34834&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FMentalNurse%2F%7E3%2FdpT-GCFi9RM%2F</link>
            <description>In the past couple of days two different articles have appeared on the Guardian&amp;#8217;s Comment is Free website, both critiquing the proposed 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-5 to its mates. If you haven&amp;#8217;t come across it, this is the manual produced by the American Psychiatric Association, giving a shopping catalogue of psychiatric diagnoses. One of them may be yours to keep.
Of the two critiques, one is written by a clinical psychologist, Dorothy Rowe. The other by a Lacanian psychoanalyst, Darian Leader. Both make reasonable points about the various difficulties of defining mental illness. Both then go on to say more about their own ideological biases than they do about psychiatry.

 Let&amp;#8217;s briefly list the valid problems with makin...</description>
            <author>Mental Nurse</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3808722</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:02:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3808722</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: July 27, 2010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3794845&amp;cid=t_181743_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F07%2F27%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-july-27-2010%2F</link>
            <description>This weekend I got in touch with a different side of my personality: the nature loving one. It&amp;#8217;s the part of me that often gets buried underneath daily worries, fears and your garden variety neuroticism. While tending to issues are important, so is taking a break from them. Based on the outpouring of responses I got concerning outdoor activities on Facebook, it seems like I might not be the only one. Isn&amp;#8217;t it nice basking in the ray of hope and possibility instead of fear and uncertainty every once in awhile?
That&amp;#8217;s what I spent my time doing in a rustic cottage in the country. I stared out the French doors of the tiny cottage for several minutes without fear of boredom or anxiety from doing nothing. I heard and felt comforted by the subtle soundtrack created by the soun...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3794845</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:36:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3794845</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Do You Heal Loneliness?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3648599&amp;cid=t_181743_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F06%2F10%2Fhow-do-you-heal-loneliness%2F</link>
            <description>If I had to name the most common complaint I hear among people with depression, it is that they are lonely. Just a little while back, I replied on a thread within Group Beyond Blue to a woman who started a thread called &amp;#8220;Who Do I Turn To?&amp;#8221; She wants so badly to connect with another woman &amp;#8212; as the anchors in her life, her mother and friends, have either passed on or moved.
So many of us are lonely. It is at the core of so many disorders and illnesses. Not just the imaginary ones made up in our psyches (or so many think), but heart disease and immunity functions and nervous system disorders. Many of our health issues in this country stem from loneliness.
In his PsychCentral blog entry, &amp;#8220;Loneliness Is Not a DSM-5 Disorder, But It Still Hurts,&amp;#8221; Psychiatrist Ron Pi...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3648599</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:05:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3648599</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Loneliness is Not a DSM-5 Disorder, But it Still Hurts</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3508243&amp;cid=t_181743_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F04%2F27%2Floneliness-is-not-a-dsm-5-disorder-but-it-still-hurts%2F</link>
            <description>The recent controversy over the still-developing DSM-5 &amp;#8212; that compendium of mental disorders the media love to call, inappropriately, &amp;#8220;The Bible of Psychiatry&amp;#8221; &amp;#8211;has gotten me thinking about loneliness. Now, thankfully, nobody has seriously proposed including loneliness in the DSM-5. Indeed, loneliness is usually thought of as simply an unpleasant part of life &amp;#8212; one of the “slings and arrows” that pierce almost all of us from time to time. Loneliness, in some ways, remains enmeshed in a web of literary and cultural clichés, born of such works as Nathaniel West’s darkly comic novel, Miss Lonelyhearts, and the Beatles’ whimsical anthem, “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band.”
But loneliness turns out to be a serious matter. And as psychiatry debat...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3508243</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:31:32 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3508243</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DSM-5 and the Kids</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3280036&amp;cid=t_181743_111_f&amp;fid=34834&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FMentalNurse%2F%7E3%2FEK2QSrSoD9g%2F</link>
            <description>We&amp;#8217;ve been a bit behind the curve in making any comment on the recently-released draft of the DSM-5. Some very good critiques and analyses have already been posted on the blogowebs, notably by Neuroskeptic and Mindhacks. See also Abysmal Musings and Confessions of a Serial Insomniac for their thoughts on what this will mean for their respective diagnoses of bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder.
Neuroskeptic acerbically comments that, &amp;#8220;If, as everyone says, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual is the Bible of Psychiatry, I&amp;#8217;m not sure why it gets heavily edited once every ten years or so.&amp;#8221; Kind of like the Gospels being rewritten regularly to give a clearer idea of what they think Jesus meant to say. Though some people seem to think that&amp;#8217;s not s...</description>
            <author>Mental Nurse</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3280036</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:07:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3280036</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>DSM-V’s Conflicts of Interest</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1432424&amp;cid=t_181743_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F05%2F09%2Fdsm-vs-conflicts-of-interest%2F</link>
            <description>Earlier this week, the Boston Globe&amp;#8217;s health blog dived into the issue of conflicts of interest for the latest mental disorder diagnostic manual being formulated. The diagnostic manual is known as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and a fifth version of it is currently in development. 
	How a disorder makes it into the DSM &amp;#8212; which is used by mental health professionals and insurance companies to legitimize and pay for a mental health concern &amp;#8212; has been the subject of numerous research papers and essays. It is a messy process, like sausage-making, and involves a combination of expert testimony (often given by the same experts who lead a subcommittee on the specific disorder), research on the disorder, and, of course, a healthy dollop of politi...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1432424</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:27:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1432424</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

