<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: duties</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'duties'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22duties%22&t=%22duties%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:30:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Why Trading with China is Good for Us</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4653308&amp;cid=t_219185_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fhd7HTNdwtwA%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel GriswoldBack in February, more than 100 House members introduced a bill that would make it easier to slap duties on imports from China. I explain why picking a trade fight with China would be a bad idea all around in an article just published in the print edition of National Review magazine.
Titled “Deal with the Dragon: Trade with the Chinese is good for us, them, and the world,” the article explains why our burgeoning trade with the Middle Kingdom is benefiting Americans as consumers, especially low- and middle-income families that spend a higher share on the everyday consumer items we import from China.
We also benefit as producers—China is now the no. 3 market for U.S. exports and by far the fastest growing major market. Chinese investment in Treasury bills keeps intere...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4653308</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:36:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4653308</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Community Living Changed My Mental Health</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4482823&amp;cid=t_219185_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F02%2F16%2Fhow-community-living-changed-my-mental-health%2F</link>
            <description>Since college, I&amp;#8217;ve moved around. I&amp;#8217;ve lived everywhere from a pint-sized East Village dwelling where I became an expert in throwing drink coasters at mice, to a snowy mountaintop apartment in Maine where I routinely slept in a sweatshirt, hat and fleece pants (ugh). After the horror of sharing a bathroom with 20 people I didn&amp;#8217;t know during my freshman and sophomore years, I made it a point, no matter where I was, to either live alone or with a two roommates at the most.
Even in Maine, where I would often go entire nights without seeing a soul (except the deer who would sometimes stare creepily through my living room windows), I reasoned that the loneliness was better than dealing with piles of other people&amp;#8217;s dirty dishes or toothpaste spit in the bathroom sink.
Fas...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4482823</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:54:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4482823</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>If Only the USTR Were This Enthusiastic about Liberalizing Trade</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4258836&amp;cid=t_219185_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FhdOrVu4LUdo%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel IkensonThere was really never any doubt that the United States would prevail in the dispute brought by China to the World Trade Organization over President Obama’s decision last year to levy duties on tire imports from China. The WTO verdict, revealed yesterday, simply affirms that the administration acted in accordance with U.S. WTO commitments—and leaves to others, such as myself, to conclude that the duties were a highly political act perpetrated with utter contempt for the significant economic and diplomatic costs of those actions.
Thus, &amp;#8220;prevailing&amp;#8221; in the WTO case should not be considered a source of universal joy for all Americans or even most Americans, as one might infer from the reaction of U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, who jubilantly proclaimed, ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4258836</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:13:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4258836</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Novel Interpretation of “Green Tariffs”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2851739&amp;cid=t_219185_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FNbCPxJgC9Vg%2F</link>
            <description>Here&amp;#8217;s a nice follow up to my blog post on Tuesday: firms importing solar panels to the United States face a $70 million bill because of unpaid duties.
It seems to me that a government truly concerned about global warming&amp;#8211;putting aside the merits of that position&amp;#8211;would want to encourage the adoption of solar panels, including by keeping them as cheap as possible. Nor, I would have thought, is this the time to add more fuel to the fire that is starting to characterize the U.S. trade relationship with China. There&amp;#8217;s plenty enough fuel for that already. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2851739</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:23:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2851739</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Return of the Trade Enforcement Canard</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2800376&amp;cid=t_219185_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fr1zXe4jZkpQ%2F</link>
            <description>In defending its tire tariff decision, the White House has glommed on to the &amp;#8220;logic&amp;#8221; that free trade first requires enforcement of trade agreements.  Scott Lincicome exposes the absurdity of that defense here. But with that fallacy serving to undergird what sounds like a pre-justification for more trade cases and more trade restrictions, let me remind the reader that we already have 299 active antidumping and countervailing duty measures in the United States, resticting or prohibiting imports from 43 different countries.  We have all sorts of restrictions on imported textiles, clothing, footwear, food products, agricultural commodities, lumber, steel, pickup trucks, tobacco, and many, many more products, including tires.  But despite all of this enforcement&amp;#8211;of rule...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2800376</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:21:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2800376</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama to Impose Tariff on Chinese Tires</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2788501&amp;cid=t_219185_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F7xZSeeBOV4c%2F</link>
            <description>From the quiet shadows of the White House, at around 10 pm on Friday night, came word that President Obama will impose prohibitive duties of 35% on imports of Chinese tires.
Well, we at Cato and elsewhere have warned repeatedly of the dangerous consequences of this outcome (June 18, July 24, August 13, September 9, September 11). Former Cato colleague and coauthor Scott Lincicome has an excellent analysis on the ramifications right here.
The good news is that we now have clarity about where the president stands on trade. The bad news is that his stance reflects his isolationist primary election campaign rhetoric and not the post-election messages of avoiding protectionism and repairing the damage done to America&amp;#8217;s international credibility by unilateralist Bush administration policie...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2788501</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:35:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2788501</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Muskrat Ignores Moral Duty to Other Sentient Beings</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1552933&amp;cid=t_219185_87_f&amp;fid=34825&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wesleyjsmith.com%2Fblog%2F2008%2F06%2Fmuskrat-ignores-moral-duty-to-other.html</link>
            <description>A muskrat has undermined a levee on the Mississippi River, leading to the threatened destruction of homes. From the story:A heroic effort by hundreds of townspeople, volunteers and National Guardsmen to hold back the Mississippi River failed yesterday--undone by a burrowing muskrat. The furry rodent dug a hole through the earthen levee in the eastern Missouri community of Winfield, allowing water to penetrate the flood wall, which failed shortly before dawn.Gasp. Undermining a human levee is as cruel as destroying a beaver's dam! Put that rodent in jail! This is a profound violation of the muskrat's duty to treat other members of the community of equals based on mere sentience, equally.What? Oh, right. The muskrat owed the threatened homeowners nothing. It is not a moral being. It was mere...</description>
            <author>Secondhand Smoke</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1552933</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1552933</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

