<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: edwards john</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'edwards john'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22edwards+john%22&t=%22edwards+john%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:57:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Today's Random Poll: Cheater!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3386870&amp;cid=t_431692_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Ffeel%2Ftodays-random-poll-cheater%2F</link>
            <description>John Edwards, philanderer (photo: WENN.com)
Following up on our Quote of the Day (thank you, Tiger!), Blisstree wants to know what you think about the issue of extramarital affairs. Would you stay with a John Edwards or a Mark Sanford? Take our anonymous poll.
#MicroPollDiv_241884 { width: 250px; margin: 0px auto; }


Post from: BlissTree (Source: Healthbolt)</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3386870</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:33:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3386870</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>John Edwards Is the Father? You Don’t Say!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3200636&amp;cid=t_431692_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2010%2F01%2F22%2Fjohn-edwards-is-the-father-you-dont-say%2F</link>
            <description>My new post on Politics Daily / Woman Up:
The only mystery left on the John Edwards story is why everyone is still talking about it. Looks like a cat-bites-toy tale to me.
After months of public denials, John Edwards has finally admitted he&amp;#8217;s the father of Rielle Hunter&amp;#8217;s 22-month-old baby girl. Yes, Edwards proved less trustworthy than his John-Boy looks suggested, but I thought Washington was used to that.
I feel sorry for John. He&amp;#8217;s ripped right out of the pages of a Shakespearean tragedy. The word &amp;#8220;scandal&amp;#8221; will forever be attached to his name. My advice to him is to devote the rest of his life to obscurity and philanthropy.
Despite all the game changing in Washington, I just can&amp;#8217;t bring myself to pile on Elizabeth Edwards. I feel bad for her, but I ...</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3200636</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:18:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3200636</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Medea or A Saint?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2414877&amp;cid=t_431692_109_f&amp;fid=35451&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jung-at-heart.com%2Fjung_at_heart%2Fa_medea_or_a_saint.html</link>
            <description>Let me start this post by saying that I am and have been a great admirer of Elizabeth Edwards since the 2004 campaign. And, while he was in the race, I was a supporter of John Edwards also, because of his willingness to speak for the poor. But something has been nagging at me since the flurry of interviews with Elizabeth has been appearing. And that something crystallized for me when I watched the first part of Charlie Rose's interview with her Thursday night. I did my dissertation on Medea and the Medea complex, which I believe is often in play when a woman feels betrayed. And I believe that there is an element of it in play now with John and Elizabeth Edwards.
What brought this into focus for me was the following:


&amp;quot;I believed we had a marriage in which this could not happen&amp;quot;...</description>
            <author>Jung At Heart</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2414877</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:29:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2414877</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Big Pharma And Its Presidential Bets</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1137220&amp;cid=t_431692_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F213162442%2F</link>
            <description>These are the figures as compiled by OpenSecrets. Hillary Clinton received $269,436 from the pharma/healthcare sector, while Barak Obama garnered $261,784. Right behind was Mitt Romney, with $260,535 (please click on the chart to make it bigger). One caveat: this is as of Oct. 29.
As an aside, it&amp;#8217;s interesting to contrast the contributions with the rhetoric. Last week, Clinton said: “I’ve taken on the drug companies. I’ve taken on the health insurance companies. I’ve taken on the oil companies, and I intend to keep doing it.&amp;#8221; Perhaps, she meant take them on until they contribute still more.
John Edwards was also talking tough. &amp;#8220;I don’t believe you can sit at a table and negotiate with drug companies, insurance companies, oil companies and hope that they will vol...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1137220</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:01:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1137220</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

