<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: emr industry</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'emr industry'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22emr+industry%22&t=%22emr+industry%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:54:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Best Description of the CareCloud EHR Platform</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5181959&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FTHPZrzE1cCI%2F</link>
            <description>In a post on EMR and EHR about Social Media and EMRs, Andre Vovan, MD MBA from Mitochon Systems offered an interesting insight into the comparison between EMR and social media.
Social media and EMR are a natural fit. Think about what social media really enables. The ablity to stay connected, following different strings of info/story weaved by connected people. Say for instance you and your friends went to the Grand Canyon, one person took pictures while the other did the cooking, planning, and was responsible for entertainment during the trip. When they try to retell the story to their friends, each will be able to add different aspect of the story and with social network platforms such as facebook, this is possible.
Now take the story above, and insert 2 doctors and change the trip taken ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5181959</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:44:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5181959</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An Opposing View of Carecloud EHR</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5107650&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2011%2F08%2F02%2Fan-opposing-view-of-carecloud-ehr%2F</link>
            <description>Turns out David, who manages the Smart Phone Healthcare, EMR Videos, EMR Screenshots and EMR News websites, didn&amp;#8217;t agree with some of the devil&amp;#8217;s advocate positions I took in my Carecloud EHR post.  He said that after reading Dr. Blackledge&amp;#8217;s post, I missed a number of things. So, the following is his commentary on what I missed in my previous Carecloud post.
Pretty much every company out there has some good and bad about it.  There are a few that are completely useless, and a few that think they are perfect, but for the most part every company has some worthwhile traits and some things they need to work on.
Last week, John wrote about a new EHR, Carecloud that has been talked about for months, but finally was released last week.  He referenced a post that was written...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5107650</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:48:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5107650</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New EHR Company Ready to Launch – Carecloud</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5077817&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emrandhipaa.com%2Femr-and-hipaa%2F2011%2F07%2F26%2Fnew-ehr-company-ready-to-launch-carecloud%2F</link>
            <description>Aaron Blackledge M.D., founder of Care Practice clinic in San Francisco, sent me a link to a post he did back in April about a new EMR company called Carecloud. The irony of this is that Carecloud had just reached out to me for information about advertising their EMR on my sites since they are getting ready to launch their product. Their impending launch was why Aaron decided to share his post with me.
I think Dr. Blackledge&amp;#8217;s post about Carecloud is summarized in his final paragraph:
My recommendation is if you are about to give up and lay down some hard earned cash on an EMR that is just good enough I would urge you to wait a few more months and compare CareCloud’s first iteration with other emerging platforms now gaining a foothold in the marketplace.
Since Carecloud is about to...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5077817</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:11:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5077817</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>KLAS EMR report highlights interesting market dynamics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4003321&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fklas-emr-report-highlights-interesting-market-dynamics</link>
            <description>KLAS' latest report revealed many interesting things about the EMR market, specifically in the area of acute-care EMRs for large hospitals with 200-plus beds. It's a snapshot of a market in transition, thanks to the ARRA funding. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4003321</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:16:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4003321</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>TempDev Named CalHIPSO REC Service Partner</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3813064&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D1016</link>
            <description>We are excited to announce that TempDev has been named an approved service partner for CalHIPSO. As the Regional Extension Center for California (except LA and Orange counties), CalHIPSO is responsible for helping priority primary care providers reach meaningful use. As an approved service partner, we will be providing our optimization and template development services to CalHIPSO enrolled providers. To enroll in CalHIPSO, visit their website and be sure to mention you would like TempDev to help you achieve meaningful use.
Related Posts

August 24, 2009 &amp;#8212; Meaningful Use Due Date: Mid 2010?
March 5, 2009 &amp;#8212; What Problem Are You Trying To Solve?
March 3, 2009 &amp;#8212; TempDev Connects: Interoperability to Create A Connected Record (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3813064</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 04:48:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3813064</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>TempDev Quoted in Technology Review</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3790784&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D1013</link>
            <description>TempDev was recently quoted about the ARRA / HITECH stimulus and the recent meaningful use guidelines in Technology Review! Click here to read the article.
Random Posts

November 30, 2008 &amp;#8212; Implementing An EMR in An IPA
August 17, 2008 &amp;#8212; Writing Gyn Procedure Templates
October 27, 2008 &amp;#8212; Tip #6 on Implementing an EMR: Turn Your Skeptics Include Advocates (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3790784</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:20:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3790784</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EMR Ethical Dilemma</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3467849&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FmFZPjwfDRQk%2F</link>
            <description>I was really intrigued by this well done article by Dr. Richard Hom about the Ethical Dilemma of the EMR. In it he describes the difference between the EMR technology world that will &amp;#8220;sell anything at any cost&amp;#8221; against the medical community values of things like the Hippocratic Oath.
He ends the post with these stinging paragraphs:
But medical angst persists. Because the EMR vendor is pursuing a &amp;#8220;top down&amp;#8221; sell, they bypass the medical leadership and pitch the C-level administrative staff. The medical input is usually an afterthought and the medical angst continues. 
Countering the medical angst and overcoming the perception of &amp;#8220;business ethics&amp;#8221; being ugly will not be easy. If there be a truth in medicine, it is the gaining and loss of trust. Trust is no...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3467849</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:52:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3467849</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How the healthcare industry can increase the number of successful EHR/EMR initiatives</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3039873&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fhow-healthcare-industry-can-increase-number-successful-ehremr-initiatives</link>
            <description>(Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3039873</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:11:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3039873</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Great Time to Be Experienced in the EMR Industry</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2931076&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FcGixiLqu9CQ%2F</link>
            <description>I was reading through this blog post describing the staffing challenges that face the healthcare IT and EMR industry in the coming years. I&amp;#8217;ve read and written quite a bit about the looming crisis in filling qualified healthcare IT and EMR jobs. However, the above blog post does a nice job of looking at it from a number of different angles. Not the least of which is the challenge of retaining staff as demand for those qualified staff members increases.
I&amp;#8217;d love to hear more about what companies are doing to retain the good, qualified and experienced healthcare IT people in their organization.
While we&amp;#8217;re at it, let&amp;#8217;s hear what EMR vendors are doing to prepare for the EMR implementation/training backlog which is likely to happen. In this regard, you might read the re...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2931076</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:47:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2931076</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Allscripts &amp; Intuit Quicken Health Deal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2886542&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D1003</link>
            <description>Today Allscripts &amp; Intuit announced a deal that will integrate Allscripts Practice Management with Intuit Quicken Health systems. Last week at the Health 2.0 Conference Intuit Quicken Health was one of the best demos because you could see how it really changes the patient&amp;#8217;s experience. I can&amp;#8217;t wait to see it working in combination with an EHR/PM system!
Instead of using CPT descriptions on EOBs they use descriptions patients can easily understand so they know what they&amp;#8217;re paying for. It breaks down payments into easily understood math. If the patient doesn&amp;#8217;t agree with something on the bill, they can fix errors right on the website. The patient is also able to pay straight from the website.
Related Posts

April 6, 2009 &amp;#8212; HIMSS Day 2: Allscripts HIE Demo
J...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2886542</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:50:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2886542</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Dell Acquires Perot Systems</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2814522&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D935</link>
            <description>Today, Dell announced that they will be purchasing Perot Systems in order to improve Dell&amp;#8217;s market share in the healthcare IT sector and increase Perot&amp;#8217;s international presence. This is another major shift in the EHR market to include some of the big IT powerhouses, which this year has included SalesForce.com&amp;#8217;s alliance with PracticeFusion and the eCW / Sam&amp;#8217;s Club / Dell deal. As we predicted when ARRA came out, the high profile stimulus is going to continue to reshape the healthcare IT vendor make-up.
For those of us in the NextGen arena, this is a big fish eats little fish scenario. Just a year ago, the major player in NextGen hosting was Tellurian Networks. Tellurian started as a small hosting operation, but did an excellent job of capturing much of the new EHR A...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2814522</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:18:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2814522</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meaningful Use Due Date: Mid 2010?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2730169&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D884</link>
            <description>Last Thursday, Dr. Blumenthal announced that meaningful use will be finalized by mid or late Spring 2010. Turns out that often quoted December 31st date is actually for a draft, after which there will be 60 days for comments and then additional revisions.
Frustrated, I went back to the initial enabling legislation in ARRA and found the following requirement:
3004(b)(1) Not later than December 31, 2009, the Secretary shall&amp;#8230; adopt an initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria&amp;#8230;
I didn&amp;#8217;t see any other language stating that the date could be pushed back. I follow the legislation pretty closely, but its certainly possible that additional legislation has been passed that extended the due date for the criteria. If so, please comment and le...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2730169</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:25:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2730169</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EMR Hype, Hope and Hyperbole</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2730174&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FPW_oVYAGSCY%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;ve been exchanging emails with someone in the EMR industry who described us as going through some interesting times of hype, hope and hyperbole.
Then, they went on to say:
&amp;#8220;I have installed (successfully and not so successfully) EMR’s and clinical systems from most vendors since the mid 90’s and found almost all vaporware looking for their next sale, but not too worried about their last.&amp;#8221;
Thankfully, I know a couple EMR vendors that aren&amp;#8217;t just &amp;#8220;vaporware looking for the next sale.&amp;#8221; Sadly, far too many of them are.


Related posts:Promising EHR Prospects with Short List of EHR Sales I recently got the following message from a colleague who...Another Example Why Small EHR Companies Face Tough Challenges No doubt many small EHR companies have been lo...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2730174</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:36:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2730174</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Strangest EHR Go-Live Stories</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2716044&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D869</link>
            <description>Anyone who has worked on EHRs for any length of time has some great stories. To implement an EHR well, you have to get a deep understanding of the fundamental dynamics of an organization. Oftentimes, you find the good along with the bad.
Here&amp;#8217;s some of the most funny and shocking stories I&amp;#8217;ve heard, with many of the details left out to protect the innocent:

Computers being kicked and thrown by frustrated physicians. I&amp;#8217;ve never experienced this one personally, but its a common theme.
A small solo physician practice where the practice management system consultant discovered the numbers weren&amp;#8217;t adding up accurately. Turns out a family member was embezzling. That&amp;#8217;s probably one of the saddest stories I&amp;#8217;ve heard.
A medical group that converted from one EHR t...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2716044</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:51:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2716044</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NextGen Announces Change to Silverlight</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2703872&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D879</link>
            <description>Last Friday, TempDev sponsored the California NextGen Advisory Group (CNAG) at the beautiful Sir Francis Drake Hotel in San Francisco. CNAG is a a collaborative of large NextGen EHR clients in California, including some of the leading IPAs, MSOs, and multi-specialty groups.
One of the presenters of was Bryan Rosenberger, NextGen&amp;#8217;s Senior Vice President of Research and Development. Bryan made the exciting announcement that NextGen&amp;#8217;s 6.0 version will be developed utilizing Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Silverlight. This is great news for NextGen users:

Silverlight offers a significant improvement in look, feel, and functionality.
By deploying via web browsers, farms of terminal servers are not long required. This allows for faster, less costly, and easier to maintain deployments.
By utilizi...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2703872</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:20:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2703872</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Pushback Against CCHIT / HITSP / HIMSS Escalates</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2695447&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D873</link>
            <description>Practice Fusion recently posted on their blog &amp;#8220;An Open Letter to ONCHIT Chief David Blumenthal&amp;#8221;. The letter contains some pretty strong language, including that CCHIT and HITSP &amp;#8220;&amp;#8230;have been overly influenced by the same small group of special interests, and have created at least the appearance of conflicts of interest.&amp;#8221; With CCHIT and HITSP having such close relationships with HIMSS, which is focused on futhering vendors by defintion, there is certainly a history of deference to furthering the goals of HIT vendors rather than directly improving functionality for physicians or patients.
In addition, the letter goes on to make the compelling point that disruptive new-comers as well as the stalwarts of IT are being left out of the discussion. The letter states tha...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2695447</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:44:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2695447</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Practice Fusion: The Future Has Arrived</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2691576&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D857</link>
            <description>We&amp;#8217;ve long had a corporate crush on Practice Fusion &amp;#8211; that spunky, SaaS EHR that&amp;#8217;s also a built in HIE. You know; the free one? Practice Fusion has been the way of the future for years now, but last Wednesday the future arrived.
Practice Fusion has announced an investment by salesforce.com, an investment which the San Francisco Business Times is calling &amp;#8220;significant&amp;#8221;. Even more revolutionary is the announcement that Practice Fusion&amp;#8217;s newest version is going to be launched on Force.com. I think our corporate crush just got a little stronger!
Why the fascination with Practice Fusion? Well..

By deploying on Force.com, Practice Fusion moves the existing proprietary software model that every current EHR software vendor utilizes to a scalable platform utilize...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2691576</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:49:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2691576</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Welcome to the new TempDev.net!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2685255&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D848</link>
            <description>This year has been revolutionary for organizations who invests in healthcare IT, including TempDev. To celebrate the exciting changes coming to our industry, we&amp;#8217;re very excited to announce our new website and refreshed blog!
You&amp;#8217;ll find a new, fresh look and feel, as well as expanded content that reflects our service lines, including:

Services - A full range of consulting services from planning and project management to custom development and upgrades.
Packages - Our plug and play solutions that offer immediate solutions to the problems you&amp;#8217;re facing today. We can also create new packages at minimal expense by sharing the cost amongst multiple organizations.
Interop -Creating a fully integrated EHR that includes interoperability with labs, radiology, medical devices, hea...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2685255</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:14:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2685255</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meaningful Use and the PHR Market</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2626103&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fmeaningful-use-and-phr-market</link>
            <description>Yesterday&amp;rsquo;s ONC HIT Policy Committee meeting was a big one.&amp;nbsp; Over the course of many hours, the committee went from hearing revised recommendations for Meaningful Use, to recommendations from the HIE workgroup and lastly recommendations regarding certification processes for EHRs.&amp;nbsp; Over the next week or so we plan to do separate write-ups on each of these topics and their implications.
But for today, one topic seems the most urgent and relevant to bring to the forefront (at least from our somewhat biased perspective) and that is&amp;hellip; (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2626103</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:19:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2626103</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Banks Beat Healthcare in Interop</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2598311&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D841</link>
            <description>Over the past year, I’ve heard the frequent comment that banks successfully deployed interoperability over 10 years ago, but the healthcare industry lags far behind. Often the comment is followed up with a statement that we can go to any bank and they can instantly access our financial information, but each physician I go to has to manually fax documentation back and forth. The banking industry is one of the most conservative in our society; healthcare can do better than banks, right?
However, what these commentators fail to remember is we cannot deduce healthcare conditions into one simplem standard currency. For example, my back pain caused by poor posture and too much time in the car is different from someone else’s back pain caused by their scoliosis, which is different from anothe...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2598311</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:01:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2598311</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>CCHIT to ONC: “Hold Your Meaningful Use Horses”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2591555&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D835</link>
            <description>&amp;#8230;.we believe most of the measures proposed for 2011 would be difficult to achieve by providers who have not already begun EHR implementations.
In a letter addressed to the Policy and Standards Committees of the Office of the National Coordinator, CCHIT stated that the draft meaningful use provisions for 2011 are overly ambitious. CCHIT also performed a gap analysis between their 2008 certification requirements and draft meaningful use provisions and came up with this neat color-coded version of the matrix. The largest gap is, not suprisingly, in reporting to Public Health agencies. I&amp;#8217;m currently working on linking up EHRs to two registries and while the people on the registry side are great to work with, it is very much uncharted territory.
While the CCHIT letter reads almost l...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2591555</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:00:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2591555</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Meaningful Use Race: Ready, Set, STOP!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2584233&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D833</link>
            <description>Ready, set, STOP.. in the mad dash to meaningful use, I feel we&amp;#8217;re stuck at the starting line.
As I mentioned in my last blog, we&amp;#8217;ve been working on a lot of big changes at TempDev &amp;#8211; the first of which will be announced early next week. As we were making these changes, the draft definition for meaningful use came out and we didn&amp;#8217;t make a peep. Why? Well, frankly there wasn&amp;#8217;t much to talk about.
The meaningful use matrix laid out the following high-level goals:

Reporting on patient quality measures (which mimic existing PQRI initiatives)
Providing patients with access to their electronic data
Exchanging data with other healthcare providers
Exchanging data with public health agencies
Following HIPAA regulations

These are great goals, but not suprising to anyon...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2584233</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:53:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2584233</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>TempDev Quoted in American Medical News</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2576673&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D830</link>
            <description>A few weeks ago, I spoke with a reported from Americal Medical News (the AMA&amp;#8217;s member newsletter). She had read our white paper about the EHR stimulus and called to ask me a few questions about how physicians can best maximize their stimulus income.
We&amp;#8217;ve been so busy with some exciting new projects (more information coming soon!), I had forgotten about the interview until a physician we work with noticed it in the published edition!
Click here to check out the article! (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2576673</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:09:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2576673</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Would You Go Back to Paper?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2405536&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D822</link>
            <description>A few days ago we received this email:
In the past few years our federally funded research floor had to be taken off of an electronic record system. We returned to paper charting. We had to develop a new system of charting using forms that we made up as we went along. We have no way to interface with the various labs throughout our hospital and clinic. Charts have to be copied so that the Medical Records Department in our hospital has a copy. Copies of the research results must be made for the various Principal Investigators and their subordinates. We used to be able to copy patients&amp;#8217; lab results so they could give this information to their physicians,we no longer have this capability. We have had to abort studies because lab results were found not be WNL. These studies would never h...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2405536</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:26:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2405536</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NextGen KBM Updates from CNAG</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2376299&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D819</link>
            <description>Today I attended California&amp;#8217;s NextGen Advocacy Group Meeting in Southern California where Jan Lee, MD spoke about where the NextGen KBM/templates are going. I thought I would share what I learned.
5.5.28 will (should) have a KBM Upgrade Wizard in it that will help clients do their own KBM Upgrades. I wasn&amp;#8217;t very happy with the fact NextGen took this right away from clients, so I am happy to see that it is returning! I can&amp;#8217;t wait to see what this wizard looks like.
KBM 7.8

Meets CCHIT requirements
Should enter LGR this week
VAERS reporting
Well Woman Quick Visit
New Gyn Home Page &amp; Tabbed Visit
3 Gyn Quick Visits
NextMD Templates
Custom plan enhancements
Age specific Peds Physical Exam with Quick Save
Review co-sign orders
Procedure scheduling
Pre-procedure patient in...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2376299</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:00:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2376299</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Small EHR Vendors: Prove you’re needed!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2376300&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D808</link>
            <description>One of the hottest blog topics of late 2008 / early 2009 has been the cries of smaller EHR vendors that innovation is stifled by large EHR vendors and CCHIT. I&amp;#8217;ll agree that some aspects of CCHIT are disconcerting, particularly the focus on ratcheting up functionality requirements that are largely irrelevant to the goals of improving patient care, EHR usability, and connectivity. However, the EHR market is clearly over-saturated with a tremendous list of EHR vendors . Having a quality product put together by a genius doctor, who used to be a programmer, is no longer enough. At this point, smaller EHR vendors need to be disruptive to capture market share; doing so will put the smaller vendors in the driver&amp;#8217;s seat and make larger vendors sit up and take notice.
Three EHR vendors ...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2376300</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:08:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2376300</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Guest Blog: EMRs &amp; Research</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2348736&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D798</link>
            <description>Phil Miller is a Professor of Biostatistics at Washington University School of Medicine who has been involved in large, multi-site NIH sponsored clinical trials. He teaches courses in epidemiology, biostatistics, and research design and is also the leader of the Research and Design Group at the Institute for Clinical and Translational Sciences (ICTS) at Washington University. We often have many conversations about the possibilities of all the wonderful discrete data just sitting, waiting to be mined in EMRs. So I asked him to write a blog for us and in the interest of disclosure, he is also my father.
EMRs and Research
One of the potential benefits of having an EMR is to facilitate medical research. This is particularly true when the data is entered into systems which contain mostly discre...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2348736</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:33:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2348736</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NextGen EHR on my iPhone!</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2314604&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D792</link>
            <description>Today NextGen announced that they have created a NextGen App for the iPhone. I can&amp;#8217;t begin to describe how exciting this is and how cool it will look in demos. I have to confess that Ben got a sneak peak at it last night and was drooling over it.
Some of the features it will include:

Access to individual patient records
Medication and allergy information, and e-prescribing
Lab orders and results, including workflow capabilities
Problem and procedure lists
Image and document access
Task management and access to the appointment schedule

Thank you NextGen! This will be awesome! (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2314604</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:21:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2314604</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>HIMSS Day 4: Alan Greenspan Keynote Address</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2314606&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D784</link>
            <description>The fourth and final day of HIMSS09. This morning’s keynote speaker was former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. I assume HIMSS booked Greenspan well before the current economic crisis. His bio in the conference guide reads like a thesis on the causes of the crisis:
Dr. Greenspan has advised leaders across the political spectrum as he called for a smaller federal budget deficit, freer trade, and less government involvement in the economy…
However, I studied Business Economics in school, so I eagerly awaited Greenspan’s speech.
Greenspan explained that growing medical costs have had little effect on the economy, despite those medical costs growing at a rate of 2% of GDP, because of the continued growth of the economy. However, the current financial crisis and the upcoming slow recovery wil...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2314606</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:28:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2314606</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NextGen EPM &amp; EHR/EMR SaaS Model</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2314607&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D758</link>
            <description>NextGen is full of pretty awesome announcements this week, including a new Subscription based SaaS (Software as a Service) Delivery Model. Here are some of the details:

$599/month/provider for either the NextGen EPM or the EHR/EMR
$799/month/provider for both the NextGen EPM &amp; EHR/EMR
They provide hosting &amp; maintenance
3M CPT4/ICD9 coding content is provided
Access to NextMD, NextGen&amp;#8217;s PHR
Set-up, implementation, &amp; training fees will be required, I wonder what the ballpark is for this?

I&amp;#8217;m quite excited to hear about this because I think it&amp;#8217;ll provide an easier way for small practices to begin utilizing NextGen. I think if the practice combines NextGen Practice Solutions along with NextGen EPM, EMR/EHR, and NextMD they be light years ahead of most practices....</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2314607</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:09:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2314607</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NextGen Offers Money Back Guarantee Program</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2314611&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D756</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;m interrupting the HIMSS coverage to bring some exciting news from NextGen. NextGen is now offering a Money Back Guarantee Program. I found this to be a very interesting concept, especially because it removes one of the last barriers to physician adoption. Unfortunately I couldn&amp;#8217;t find out too much on their website about it other than the basics:

Are all NextGen customers eligible for this or only new ones?
Is this version specific? Meaning do you have to be on the most current core version to be eligible? How about KBM versions?
How about specialties who are not in the KBM and built their own templates. Do they count?
Do groups who have made their own EMR template modifications count?
Could you get your data out to move it to a different EHR?

It is nice to know that if you...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2314611</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:21:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2314611</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Who Should Conform: You or the EMR?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2288928&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D685</link>
            <description>So you&amp;#8217;ve chosen your EMR and now you&amp;#8217;re heading down the implementation road and you come to a fork in the road: one way is to go with the EMR vendor provided workflow and the other is to forge your own path. I am lucky that I have been witness to physician organizations traveling down each path and some jumping between the paths because they can&amp;#8217;t seem to make up their minds, so I will try to weigh the pros and cons of each.
Traveling the EMR Vendor Workflow Path
Pros

It has been tested and is being used in many practices around the country.
Your vendor should be able to provide you with reference practices if you have questions.
It is often much more affordable.
If the vendor upgrades their workflow to be more efficient or to meet new standards, you should be easily u...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2288928</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:46:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2288928</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Walmart Enters the EHR/EMR Arena with Dell &amp; eClinicalWorks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2258280&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D683</link>
            <description>A while ago Ben wrote about the EHR&amp;#8217;s becoming the New Bubble and today I read news that Walmart is teaming up with Sam&amp;#8217;s Club, Dell, and eClinicalWorks to offer a packaged deal for EHRs. They will be offering a packaged deal using their extraordinary buying power to implement an EHR for under $25,000 for the first physician and about $10,000 for each additional provider. With additional training costs, maintenance, &amp; support between $4,000-6000 a year.
I never thought Walmart would be one of the companies to throw their hat in the game so quickly. I surely thought it would be a technology company. Other than amazing buying power, from somewhat questionable practices to be debated somewhere else, what does Walmart have to offer Healthcare IT? I would love to see tech compan...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2258280</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:16:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2258280</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama’s Newest Website - HealthReform.gov</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2258281&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D678</link>
            <description>Discussions to talk about how to reform health care in America&amp;#8221;. These are intended to be local gatherings, in people&amp;#8217;s homes or community centers, to foster a dialogue on how we can improve our health care system.
I have to admit that this effort looks like window dressing. A group of citizens batting back and forth ideas before hurrying home to catch &amp;#8220;Dancing with the Stars&amp;#8221; isn&amp;#8217;t going to solve our health care issues. However, the openness to foster a dialogue is refreshing. As our newest contributor to this blog, John, has been pointing out, there&amp;#8217;s some very concrete steps that can be taken towards improving our health care system.
But I have to point out&amp;#8230; almost $20 billion will be distributed in less than 2 years, but the word HITECH doesn&amp;#...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2258281</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:27:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2258281</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EHR Certification - A Necessary Process</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2243056&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D670</link>
            <description>Recently a friend asked my opinion on CCHIT with consideration to innovative products and whether there may actually be the touted perception of inclusion/exclusion.  My opinion&amp;#8230;.there&amp;#8217;s NO favoring going on.  The prospect of certification should be broken into 2 areas:  1). the technology and function of it; and 2). the business aspect.
I&amp;#8217;m fortunate enough to be familiar with system certification programs and by far, EHR certification was a long time coming (in fact I recall a distinct conversation with CMS circa  Oct &amp;#8216;03 where I outlined an AS2-like certification process for EHR).  At the time the notion of &amp;#8220;government driving the market&amp;#8221; was a given a strenuous &amp;#8220;NO WAY, that is not our role&amp;#8221;&amp;#8230;
How times change.   Not onl...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2243056</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:13:04 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2243056</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Problem Are You Trying To Solve?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2235820&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D617</link>
            <description>A good friend and mentor was known for sitting patiently during long, contentious meetings before finally asking &amp;#8220;What problem are we trying to solve?&amp;#8221; After receiving blank stares, she would respond with &amp;#8220;I think we&amp;#8217;re getting ahead of ourselves. Let&amp;#8217;s define the problem before we attempt to solve it.&amp;#8221;
I consistently find problem definition to be one of the most overlooked components of any project. And what&amp;#8217;s funny is PMPs often get so busy coming up with a charter, vision statement, or some other Project Management Institute concoctions, rather than gaining a firm grasp of the problem to be solved. This approach directly results in loss in money, time, and resources as the project drifts without a clear mission.
Similarly, when making decisions ...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2235820</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:36:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2235820</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Does Kathleen Sebelius Know About EHRs?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2228389&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D628</link>
            <description>Governor Kathleen Sebelius was nominated by President Obama yesterday for the HHS Secretary post. With much of the definition of the HITECH Act waiting for the new HHS Secretary&amp;#8217;s definition, we&amp;#8217;ve all been waiting with baited breath to see who will be put into this important role. Now we&amp;#8217;re left asking: What does Kathleen Sebelius know about EHRs?
Let me say up-front: I know absolutely nothing about Kathleen Sebelius nor Kansas politics. While considering myself to be a political junkie, most of my knowledge is focused on the politicians of the People&amp;#8217;s Republic of California and the Socialist Hippie State of San Francisco. If someone is an expert in either Kathleen Sebelius or Kansas politics, I welcome you to comment or contact me to do a guest blog.
In place of ...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2228389</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:44:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2228389</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EHR Consultant Motives</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2224525&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D612</link>
            <description>John Lynn at EMR and HIPAA wrote a great article about choosing EHR/EMR Consultants: Does Your EHR Consultant Have Your Best Interest in Mind? I believe people who are thinking about choosing a consultant, should take a couple of moments to read it. One of the reasons I love this article is because it re-affirms a conscious choice Ben &amp; I chose with TempDev: not to be involved in the selection process.
We are both very comfortable with NextGen and while we know other EHRs we would be completely biased towards one EHR. For this reason, we decided it wouldn&amp;#8217;t be ethical for our company to be involved in selection.
One selection and contracts are signed our company can bring vendor relationships to the client to help them with thorough implementation and optimization experience. We ...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2224525</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 01:07:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2224525</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EHR/EMR HITECH Stimulus White Paper</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2207513&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D598</link>
            <description>The HITECH stimulus has caused a lot of confusion and TempDev has wanted to provide a summary for our clients. Here&amp;#8217;s a white paper outlining what&amp;#8217;s known  so far. The white paper is generically written as our clients are include IPAs, MSOs, CHCs, private practices, and vendors. Also, its tailored specifically to the NextGen community, but the  principles are applicable to all EHR users regardless of your vendor. (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2207513</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:30:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2207513</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to Maximize Your EHR HITECH Stimulus</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2207514&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D593</link>
            <description>The HITECH EHR stimulus, coupled with existing incentives for e-prescribing, PQRI, and MCMP represent significant opportunities to further your EHR investment. While much of the HITECH stimulus bill is still undefined, there&amp;#8217;s specific steps that you can take today to optimally position your organization to receive the maximum payments.
Obviously, if you&amp;#8217;re not using an EHR, start looking now as the selection and deployment process will take you several months. If you&amp;#8217;re already using an EHR, you need to meet qualifying requirements early and have a maximum number of providers live.
The qualifying requirements include &amp;#8220;meaningful use&amp;#8221; of a certified EHR. The certification standards are undefined, but will likely follow CCHIT. At a minimum, certified EHRs will ...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2207514</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:57:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2207514</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EHR/EMR Stimulus Package</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2192474&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D572</link>
            <description>All I&amp;#8217;ve been hearing lately is stimulus package, stimulus package, stimulus package. Ben and I have started to make plans for when all this money starts to hit and today I noticed that NextGen has too. They&amp;#8217;ve even made their own webpage for it and even having a webinar! I keep feeling that everyone is just seeing money and I wonder if the industry is really prepared for the influx of cash it is about to see?
Some of the developments I would like to see:

More investments in research and development, what is available just isn&amp;#8217;t good enough to support all the providers that are about to get a new EHR.
Pre-existing software companies creating an EHR, come on Microsoft and Google!
More high level consultants, maybe some of the people from tech will come into health care IT...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2192474</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:19:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2192474</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EHRs: The New Bubble?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2175225&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D562</link>
            <description>As Obama&amp;#8217;s economic stimulus gets closer and closer to passing, EHR companies and consultants alike are celebrating. By providing $41K over 5 years beginning in 2011 (by year: $15K, $12K, $8K, $4K, $2K) via Medicare bonuses, physicians will see a real financial benefit to making the leap to an electronic record. Also, the stimulus plan comes with a stick: if physicians don&amp;#8217;t make the leap by 2015, they will see a decrease in their Medicare reimbursement.
But is the government replacing the burst housing bubble with an EHR bubble? As pointed out in our last post by John Weir, more than 62,000 implementers will be required to fill just the deployment needs.  To fill this need, anyone who has ever touched an EHR, no matter their qualifications or ability to effectively implement,...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2175225</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:57:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2175225</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EMR Stimulus: Commendable but unrealistic?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2169022&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D563</link>
            <description>We always appreciate insight from our friend John Weir, President of Illumysis. He is honest, direct, knowledge, and usually spot on.
As a result, John recent comment on my post about Obama&amp;#8217;s goal of getting the entire country on EMRs deserves its own post. As John points out, while Obama&amp;#8217;s stimulus is commendable, it is unrealistic:
I love the support from Government, BUT feasibility? Not quite…. There are approximately 563,000 providers in the US, layer in support staff and nursing and the numbers are huge. Given that in ambulatory care we’re still in the 18 - 24% adoption range depending on what journal one reads, 5 years is a dream, especially since the outstanding 80% has not selected a system yet (generally a 30-120 process for even solo practices). So let’s take th...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2169022</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:01:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2169022</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EMR and EHR Industry Ready to Contract</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2167459&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=34634&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FEmrAndHipaa%2F%7E3%2FLntQrSKFshY%2F</link>
            <description>Considering the tremendous amount of political talk about EMR and EHR systems, you&amp;#8217;d think that the number of EMR companies would continue to grow (see my EMR list of over 400 companies).  It makes sense that entrepreneurs would chase after the $$&amp;#8217;s that they see being invested in EMR, EHR and health care IT.  However, I personally believe that the number of EMR companies will decrease in the next year rather than increase.
The number one reason that EMR companies will descrease over the next year is that we&amp;#8217;re going to see an amazing number of EMR companies failing.  The current economic climate is not the best time to be an EMR company.  Those EMR companies who require sales of EMR software to survive are going to have major troubles surviving.  Many EMR companies ...</description>
            <author>EMR and HIPAA</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2167459</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:25:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2167459</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EHR vs. EMR: Why Does the Name Matter?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2164640&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D557</link>
            <description>NextGen changed their website a while ago to say that they were changing their product name from EMR to EHR to more accurately reflect what the product truly is. Today they sent out the announcement in their What&amp;#8217;s Next Newsletter with their reasoning:
As recently defined by the National Alliance for Health Information Technology (NAHIT), an EHR takes electronic medical records to the next level with interoperability. We wanted our clinical system’s product name to reflect its ability to deliver this important functionality.
So basically the story goes that an EHR (electronic health record) is an interoperable record where there are multiple contributors to the record. An EMR (electronic medical record) is a record for a single organization without any other interoperability. I hon...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2164640</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:13:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2164640</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>CCHIT Looks to Expand Further into Sub-Categories</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2153722&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D554</link>
            <description>CCHIT has been the target of many smaller EMR companies of late because of frustration around the expense of the certification process and questions about the independence of the commission. I am going to wait until a future blog by one of our guest posters before passing judgement, except to say that for better or worse CCHIT is a powerful driver in the EHR marketplace.
On January 15th, CCHIT released a draft expansion roadmap and requested comments. The areas the commission is looking into expand into are:

Behavioral Health
Clinical Research
Dermatology
Oncology
Advanced Interoperability
Advanced Quality (in reference to Quality Measures)
Advanced Clinical Decision Support
Long Term Care
OB/GYN

This is in addition to the new HIE and PHR categories added for 2009.
As we&amp;#8217;ve said ma...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2153722</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:27:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2153722</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>When Free Isn’t Cheap Enough</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2150122&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D552</link>
            <description>Dr. Robert Rowley wrote a blog over over at The Health Care Blog about Freenomics and Healthcare IT. Now I have to say that I&amp;#8217;m very intrigued by the idea of EMR/EHR Freenomics, but then again I live in the heart of Silicon Valley. I also make my living from the implementation/integration of EMRs so it would hurt my pocketbook if everyone signed up for Practice Fusion, I might not have much of a career in that field. However, it does have Ben and I talking about what we could to implement our solutions at a reduced cost to the practice utilizing some of these ideas.
I found the comments on the blog a bit amusing with people complaining about ads. Can anyone remember a time when they went into a provider&amp;#8217;s office and there wasn&amp;#8217;t an ad on a pen, pad of a paper, poster on t...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2150122</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:07:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2150122</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why is the FDA messing up my med list?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2126497&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D536</link>
            <description>We&amp;#8217;ve been on a bit of a blog writing hiatus. Laura went to DC for Obama&amp;#8217;s inauguration and I&amp;#8217;ve been busy bringing a few clinics live. But when I saw a posting by Paul Land on the popular NextGen Yahoo Users Group, I knew I had to write something.
Turns out that FDA allows drug manufacturers to reuse NDCs, or National Drug Codes. This means if Potassium Chloride  prescribed for me last week. it could now have the same NDC  as Oxycodone HCL. Further, if my EHR record is using the NDC as the identifying key for medications, my medical record could suddenly change from Potassium Chloride to Oxycodone HCL. Even worse, now that Medicare is pushing e-prescribing, my refill request for Potassium Chloride could turn into a bottle of Oxycodone. That&amp;#8217;d be a surprise!
The g...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2126497</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:10:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2126497</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD-10 Code Sets Pushed by 2 Years</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2108645&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D534</link>
            <description>Remember that whole blog I had the other day about how the government should lead by example? Well today they pushed the implementation of ICD-10 codes by 2 years. See, I feel like no one takes any regulation in health care seriously because every time they release a regulation, it always ends up getting pushed a couple of years.
If you&amp;#8217;d like to read more about it, head on over to HHS Issues Final ICD-10 Code Sets and Updated Electronic Transaction Standards Rules.
My favorite quote was:
“These regulations will move the nation toward a more efficient, quality-focused health care system by helping accelerate the widespread adoption of health information technology,” HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said.  “The greatly expanded ICD-10 code sets will fully support quality reporting, p...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2108645</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:09:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2108645</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Consultants: Different Types</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2098744&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D513</link>
            <description>So being a consultant I&amp;#8217;m very passionate about the topic of our series on the Good, Bad, and Ugly of the consultant community. I have to say that after cleaning up &amp;#8220;the ugly&amp;#8221; as a full time employee and as a consultant, it makes me even more fired up. I&amp;#8217;m excited to contribute to John&amp;#8217;s questions about Making the Most of an EHR Consultant. This is a huge topic, so I will break it down to the different types of consultants for the different phases of your implementation.
Phase 1 - EHR/EMR Selection Consultants

There are consulting groups that specialize in helping you make the selection of your EMR/EHR vendor. If your group needs help getting vendors together, viewing demos, knowing what to looking for, and helping you decide what would be the best for your g...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2098744</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:54:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2098744</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Twitter: A New Approach to EMR/EHR Implementation?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2096229&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D523</link>
            <description>So tonight as I was celebrating my husband&amp;#8217;s birthday at Dave and Buster&amp;#8217;s, I was using Twitter to see who was winning the Golden Globes on their Twitter Page. Twitter as Wikipedia defines it is a free social networking and micro-blogging service that allows its users to send and read other users&amp;#8217; updates (otherwise known as tweets), which are text-based posts of up to 140 characters in length.
I have my personal Twitter and my professional Twitter which I love to use to communicate with friends. Sometimes it&amp;#8217;s easier to send a text to update everyone about what is going on that anything else.
So here is my new idea: when there is a large muli-site implementation, use Twitter to communicate with the different onsite implementation teams. Here is how to set it up:

H...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2096229</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:43:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2096229</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Consultants: Does an unbiased consultant exist?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2095449&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D510</link>
            <description>As continuation of our series on the Good, Bad, and Ugly of the consultant community, we&amp;#8217;ll answer another of John&amp;#8217;s questions: Does unbiased consultant exist?
As a consultant, the answer is clearly no! Every consultant will have experience with certain EMRs, maybe even partnerships with specific EMR companies, and will consciously or sub-consciously drive you to their EMR of choice.
However, there are benefits to having consultants assist with the system selection process. Consultants who have been through successful EMR implementations will know the right questions to ask, be able to quickly identify red flags (such as vaporware), and have access to fellow consultants to query for honest, off the record, opinions.
So how do you use a consultant for system selection when they&amp;...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2095449</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:21:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2095449</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What I Like About the Practice Fusion Way</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2093713&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D508</link>
            <description>So this post probably isn&amp;#8217;t the best one for a consultant to write but I&amp;#8217;ve been thinking about things since Practice Fusion&amp;#8217;s Dr. Robert Rowley (their Chief Medical Officer) has replied to our posts and there are quite a few things I like about this company and the way they do things. I haven&amp;#8217;t used their EMR, nor have I implemented it but there are certain ideas about the company. I couldn&amp;#8217;t roll it out to my huge clients in its current state but with some improvements, it could quickly become a force to be reckoned with.
So here are the things I find innovate about Practice Fusion and where other EMR companies should really step up and take notice:

It&amp;#8217;s free! You can also purchase a no-ad version for very reasonable price. I&amp;#8217;m not saying that e...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2093713</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:23:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2093713</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Consultants: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2093714&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D502</link>
            <description>John over at the EMR and HIPAA blog recently asked for feedback on the good, bad, and ugly of EMR consultants. Laura and I are starting a series of post on this topic and will be exploring the consulting world from both a participant and client perspective.
First and foremost, most consultants in the EMR realm (and the larger consulting industry as a whole) are not consultants. They&amp;#8217;re contractors.
Consultants must bring expertise and knowledge to your project that provide measurable results. Consultants should have &amp;#8220;been there&amp;#8221; countless times before, proven the results you&amp;#8217;re looking for in similar settings, and provide strong guidance to the project. Consultants should be seen as a short term solution to get a project on the right track and build momentum for the...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2093714</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:54:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2093714</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama: 100% EMR in 5 Years</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2090832&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D498</link>
            <description>A few weeks ago, I blogged about how Obama wants to include EMR investment as part of his economic stimulus package. Today, in another speech on stimulating the economy, the president-elect made the below statement:
To improve the quality of our health care while lowering its cost, we will make the immediate investments necessary to ensure that within five years, all of America’s medical records are computerized.  This will cut waste, eliminate red tape, and reduce the need to repeat expensive medical tests.  But it just won’t save billions of dollars and thousands of jobs – it will save lives by reducing the deadly but preventable medical errors that pervade our health care system.
The 2014 date for 100% EMR usage isn&amp;#8217;t new; President Bush set this goal in 2004. What&amp;#8217;s...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2090832</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 05:41:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2090832</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Government: Lead by Example</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2090833&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D495</link>
            <description>As I sit in my living room, gazing at a dot matrix printer, I question my wonderful government&amp;#8217;s choices in healthcare. You see, we created a template package that prints the CHDP PM160 Form that uses a dot matrix imprint printer. Why do you ask? Because it&amp;#8217;s for the state of California of course! It needs to be on a 4 piece carbon copy piece of paper. Yes, I am serious.
I also reminded of sitting next to my favorite biller at my previous job, Cindy. Every morning she would dial into the Medicare Bulletin Board System using a Modem. Yes, that&amp;#8217;s right, a modem. The only payer that she had to do this for.
I agree with all of the new regulations that are coming down from the government (eprescribing, secondary claims, etc.). I am very supportive of decreasing the inefficienc...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2090833</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:32:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2090833</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EMR 2.0 Video by AllScripts</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2081838&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D486</link>
            <description>If a picture is worth a thousand words, a video should be worth ten thousand.
We&amp;#8217;ve posted some recent blogs about EMR 2.0 (here and here) outlining what makes an EMR and EMR 2.0. But we haven&amp;#8217;t spent much time explaining why EMR 2.0&amp;#8217;s are needed and what the benefits are to healthcare provides and patients. Look for some future blogs on these topics, but in the meantime check out this great video by AllScripts which is truly worth ten thousand words.
My favorite words: &amp;#8220;Shouldn&amp;#8217;t connecting to healthcare be as easy as going online, using an ATM, or downloading music?&amp;#8221; We agree that yes, connecting to healthcare should be as easy and with EMR 2.o it will be. (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2081838</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:57:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2081838</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What makes an EMR 2.0?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2077112&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D454</link>
            <description>The other day, I posted a guest blog by Dr. Robert Rowley, Chief Medical Officer for Practice Fusion. In his posting, Dr. Rowley explains that Practice Fusion is approaching &amp;#8220;EMR 2.0&amp;#8243; while NextGen and other client-server based applications are &amp;#8220;dinosaurs&amp;#8221;. While I completely agree with Dr. Rowley&amp;#8217;s assertion that EMRs must evolve from stand-alone systems to a network of interconnected tools,  I don&amp;#8217;t agree that a web-based architecture by itself is indicative of EMR 2.0.
For the sake of this posting, I am going to define EMR 2.0 as an electronic medical record system that can share data in real-time with a variety of systems. These other systems should include, at a minimum, a patient portal, major PHR (HealthVault or Google Health), other health syste...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2077112</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 05:00:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2077112</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Guest Blog: A case study in two very different approaches to EMR</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2077114&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D437</link>
            <description>A few days ago Dr. Robert Rowley, Chief Medical Officer at Practice Fusion, posted a comment on my entry about NextGen renaming their product from EHR to EMR. I asked Dr. Rowley if he would be interested in writing a guest blog comparing Practice Fusion&amp;#8217;s business model to that being utilized by NextGen. He provided this interesting analysis from the other side of the EMR universe:
__________________________________________________________________
NextGen vs Practice Fusion: a case study in two very different approaches to EMR
The EMR/EHR space has seen  divergent approaches to medical records software development – NextGen is an example of one approach, and PracticeFusion is an example of a fundamentally different approach. Rather than seeing them as “a spectrum” of approache...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2077114</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:49:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2077114</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Creating a Google Health PHR</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2066295&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D429</link>
            <description>So I&amp;#8217;m working on creating a Google Health PHR because I feel like I should jump on the PHR bandwagon being in this industry and as I work on creating mine I&amp;#8217;m going to provide my feedback.

I imported my prescriptions from Medco which I loved that I had the option to do. However it didn&amp;#8217;t include any strength, start date, or SIG information. I didn&amp;#8217;t really figure out how to make imported medications inactive or edit them. This is really annoying to me. Do I have to make duplicate medications to add this information? I should be able to edit the record.
I used the SIG builder. NextGen, give Google a call. Theirs is pretty easy to use and has quite a bit of what you need.
When I entered my allergy to guinea pigs it couldn&amp;#8217;t find it but still added it but added...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2066295</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:50:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2066295</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Going to Jail…</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2034579&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D408</link>
            <description>Oh, the places our NextGen jobs take us!
I am currently getting ready to go back to jail for the sixth time in two days&amp;#8230; this time at midnight! What&amp;#8217;s my crime? Implementing NextGen in a custody health setting.
Custody is an entirely different setting for implementing NextGen. The jail system is part outpatient, in the form of clinics, and part inpatient, in the form of pill calls and the infirmary.
So why am I going to jail at midnight? Two reasons: I am a firm believer in walking in the users&amp;#8217; shoes whenever I encounter a new clinical setting. Also, I welcome any opportunity to add to my EMR knowledge.
Wish me luck! I hope they keep letting me out of jail&amp;#8230; (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2034579</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:00:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2034579</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama on EMRs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2022804&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D400</link>
            <description>In this past weekend&amp;#8217;s radio address, President-elect Obama discussed his extensive plans for stimulating the economy including significant investment in EMRs:
In addition to connecting our libraries and schools to the internet, we must also ensure that our hospitals are connected to each other through the internet. That is why the economic recovery plan I’m proposing will help modernize our health care system – and that won’t just save jobs, it will save lives. We will make sure that every doctor’s office and hospital in this country is using cutting edge technology and electronic medical records so that we can cut red tape, prevent medical mistakes, and help save billions of dollars each year.
Its certainly exciting to hear Obama continue promoting EMR investments so promin...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2022804</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:23:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2022804</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Implementing An EMR in An IPA</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2000523&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D396</link>
            <description>Laura and I have worked with EMRs in a wide range of settings, including small private practices, large private practices, IPAs, MSOs, public health systems, and correctional health systems. Each setting provides its own nuances and difficulties, but IPAs have some unique challenges.
An IPA is a group of independent practices that come together to collectively contract with HMOs. The IPAs receive capitation, a set fee per member per month, which is in turn used to pay claims from the participating physicians.
The most interesting aspect of an IPA from an EMR perspective is the fact that all of the practices are completely independent from each other and the IPA itself. When an IPA chooses to implement an EMR (which is a very altruistic act of the IPA; there&amp;#8217;s no direct net revenue be...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2000523</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:00:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2000523</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Off to the 2008 NextGen User Group Meeting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1945671&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D309</link>
            <description>Tomorrow, I&amp;#8217;m off to the NextGen User Group Meeting at the Gaylord Opryland hotel in Nashville, TN. This will be the third UGM I have been to and I am sure NextGen will continue their strong record of putting on an informative and exciting event.
For those attending in person, be sure to stop by and talk to Laura the Midmark booth to find out more about Midmark/NextGen device interoperability. Feel free to seek me out as well; I&amp;#8217;ll be attending the talks, catching up with old friends, and meeting new members of the EMR user community.
For those who cannot attend in person, TempDev is excited to announce a first for UGM: Laura and I will be blogging live from the convention floor. Keep checking back here as we keep you updated about on the exciting events! (Source: Implementing ...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1945671</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 08:17:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1945671</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Outsourcing Helpdesk Functions</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1928234&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D109</link>
            <description>One of the most important roles to fill when implementing an EMR for a large practice or enterprise is the Helpdesk. Groups need to have someone to call for help with both IT &amp; EMR needs. This person or group of people should be able to accurately record the problem and have a process for escalation. They need to be competant with the EMR and at least understand basic IT functions. Sometimes this position is very difficult to fill and keep filled because it&amp;#8217;s not always the higest paying position and if the person is good, they&amp;#8217;ll probably be quickly promoted to an Application Specialist/Business Analyst position.
So what should groups do to help out with support? I think that this is a great thing to outsource. You can have a group of people who are both EMR &amp; IT compe...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1928234</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:44:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1928234</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Does It Take to be an EMR Consultant?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1922185&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D286</link>
            <description>Sometimes people say to me that they want to do what I do, so I thought I&amp;#8217;d write about what it takes to be an independent consultant. Well luckily it&amp;#8217;s not just me now, a couple of months ago I brought a partner (Ben) into the company which is awesome. So here are some of my tips:

Be absolutely certain that you&amp;#8217;re prepared to be a consultant. It&amp;#8217;s a lot more demanding than being an employee and mistakes aren&amp;#8217;t as easily forgiven.
Have a solid contract, at least a year commitment, with a group before leaving your full time job. This doesn&amp;#8217;t have to be full-time contract , but at least something that will pay your bills.
Get a CPA! Keeping track of quarterly with holdings and paying the IRA &amp; State all your money is tough.
Try to find a good niche ma...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1922185</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:06:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1922185</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MacPractice Announces Charge Coding</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1909415&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D249</link>
            <description>On Thursday MacPractice announced that they can now capture charges using their EMR. Billers can approve and post charges with a couple of clicks. This just makes MacPractice so much more appealingto users. Now if only there was a PC version of MacPractice so it could be all around versatile.
Here is my favorite part of MacPractice: &amp;#8220;MacPractice EMR for MacPractice MD and MacPractice 20/20 is available through December 31, 2008 for $3500 plus $500 annually for support and updates.&amp;#8221; How great of a deal is that?
I was just wondering if any of our readers use MacPractice? I would love to hear about how it&amp;#8217;s working in your practice. (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1909415</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:01:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1909415</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>UAE Selects Cerner for their EMR</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1909419&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D233</link>
            <description>I recently blogged about American EMR in Europe. This week, I ran across an article on the United Arab Emirates selection of Cerner for the Northern Emirates Ministry of Health.
TempDev has partnerships with a number of consulting companies, including a Cerner partner. Turns out the Cerner partner will be involved in the UAE roll-out. One of their senior managers was explaining to me that he sent an email out to his staff here in the states inquiring who would be interested in staffing the UAE project. He was suprised at the number of favorable response.
While the UAE is relatively safe as Middle East countries go, the American embassy in Abu Dhabi still releases warnings about Americans in UAE becoming potential terrorist targets. Would you be willing to travel to the UAE to assist with t...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1909419</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:14:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1909419</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Because we’ve been there.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1909421&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D235</link>
            <description>We&amp;#8217;ve been thinking about creating a tagline for TempDev and came up with &amp;#8220;Because we&amp;#8217;ve been there&amp;#8221;. The reasoning behind it is that our consultants were full-time employees at practices/groups who were implementing NextGen. We understand how painful bad implementations can be, we&amp;#8217;ve seen the tears. I think this is what makes our group unique. When we walk into a client&amp;#8217;s office, we can empathize with the client because we&amp;#8217;ve been the client. I enjoy this aspect of our company and I hope it stays this way for quite some time.
So, what do you think? Do you like it? (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1909421</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:00:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1909421</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NextGen’s New Push: Hospitals and Health Systems</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1909422&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D226</link>
            <description>Over the past few years, NextGen has been increasingly moving into the Hospital and Health Systems EMR market long dominated by Cerner and Epic. This move made large strides as NextGen&amp;#8217;s strategic relationship with Siemens has brought several large hospital systems on-board.
Today, NextGen released their new website, logo, and marketing efforts which prominently includes Hospital and Health Systems. However, NextGen&amp;#8217;s products are still only applicable to ambulatory settings, which precludes much of the business, and revenue, of Hospital and Health Systems. Makes one wonder what the future holds&amp;#8230; (Source: Implementing EMRs)</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1909422</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:22:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1909422</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Which PHR Do You Use?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1909423&amp;cid=t_209057_113_f&amp;fid=38130&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tempdev.net%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D223</link>
            <description>So with Google Health &amp; Microsoft HealthVault large, respectable software companies are now getting into the Personal Health Record business. Can I just saw how nice it is to have companies like these these paying attention to health care? So I have an account for both, but I hate to say that I just don&amp;#8217;t use them. Now I&amp;#8217;m young and have no chronic conditions, so I haven&amp;#8217;t seen the huge need to get cracking on creating mine. Also, I haven&amp;#8217;t seen the huge benefit yet. I honestly can&amp;#8217;t see the advantage to me until they are hooked up with an EMR or EHR. I know there are plans for these, but until I can see the benefits, I probably won&amp;#8217;t take the time with it.
I helped implement NextMD which is NextGen&amp;#8217;s PHR. It&amp;#8217;s great because it&amp;#8217;s ho...</description>
            <author>Implementing EMRs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1909423</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:46:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1909423</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

