<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: endnote</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'endnote'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22endnote%22&t=%22endnote%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:36:45 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Collaborating and Delivering Literature Search Results to Clinical Teams Using Web 2.0 Tools</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3845075&amp;cid=t_114681_86_f&amp;fid=38272&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flaikaspoetnik.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F08%2F08%2Fcollaborating-and-delivering-literature-search-results-to-clinical-teams-using-web-2-0-tools%2F</link>
            <description>There seem to be two camps in the library, the medical and many other worlds: those who embrace Web 2.0, because they consider it&amp;#160;useful for their practice and those who are unaware of Web 2.0 or think it is just a fad.&amp;#160;There are only a few ways the Web 2.0-critical people can be convinced: by [...] (Source: Laika's MedLibLog)</description>
            <author>Laika's MedLibLog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3845075</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:52:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3845075</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>No time for an EndNote class?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2206817&amp;cid=t_114681_125_f&amp;fid=36046&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdentistrylibrary.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F02%2Fno-time-for-endnote-class.html</link>
            <description>Try our EndNote tutorial online! Also, EndNoteX2 for Mac or PC is now available for download from the same page with your UniKey. To help you with the use of the software we prepared EndNote basic and EndNote extras notes for you.&amp;nbsp;Subscribe in a reader (Source: DentistryLibrary@Sydney)</description>
            <author>DentistryLibrary@Sydney</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2206817</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:38:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2206817</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>EndNote X1 tips</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1829031&amp;cid=t_114681_86_f&amp;fid=34468&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrowsing.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F09%2Fendnote-x1-tips.html</link>
            <description>This posting is to augment the information at http://www.le.ac.uk/li/research/bibliographic.html and I shall add to it as I realise things. What is on this page applies only to University of Leicester members.1. EndNote 9 is due to disappear very soon, and you must download EndNote X1. Instructions for doing this are on the link above. 2. You then need to install the EndNote X1 toolbar - go to Start - All Programs - CFS Software 2 - EndNote X1 - Install Word toolbar. Note that Word 2007 has its own referencing facilities (on the References tab) - I personally think this will be too limited for the sort of use we want to make. This References tab is nothing to do with EndNote. If you had EndNote 9 and Word 2007, EndNote appeared on the Add-Ins tab. Once you have installed the EndNote X1 too...</description>
            <author>Browsing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1829031</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:07:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1829031</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>PubMed includes DOIs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1622003&amp;cid=t_114681_86_f&amp;fid=34468&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrowsing.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F07%2Fpubmed-includes-dois.html</link>
            <description>PubMed now includes DOIs in its records - see NLM Technical Bulletin article for more details.  In the tagged MEDLINE format, the DOI is in a field called LID, according to this bulletin. I have done a quick PubMed search and found the DOI appearing as AID, however.A quick test suggests that AID goes to the DOI field in RefWorks, and the Electronic Resource Number field in EndNote 9. (Source: Browsing)</description>
            <author>Browsing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1622003</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:32:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1622003</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Ovid Medline and EndNote</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1360301&amp;cid=t_114681_86_f&amp;fid=34468&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrowsing.blogspot.com%2F2008%2F04%2Fovid-medline-and-endnote.html</link>
            <description>Problem solved!  I posted to Thomson's email discussion list, and John East of the University of Queensland Library replied with a solution.  There are tags within the filter that EndNote uses to decide which filter to choose to import the references.  There was another filter with the same settings for those tags, and EndNote was using that filter instead.  That filter (the one for Ovid AutoAlerts) was set to import AU and FA both into the Author field.I would never have thought of this in a long time! Most grateful to John for his help. (Source: Browsing)</description>
            <author>Browsing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1360301</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:52:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1360301</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Comparison bibliographic management software: Refworks, EndNote &amp; EndNoteWeb</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=563791&amp;cid=t_114681_86_f&amp;fid=34461&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigicmb.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F04%2Fcomparison-bibliographic-management.html</link>
            <description>Jeroen Bosmans posts about on a special seminar of Refworks in Utrecht, lists minimum requirements and summarizes convincing arguments why possible web-based alternatives like Connotea, Zotero, CiteUlike (and a host of others) do not comply: they lack SFX compliance, word processor integration and/or easy import functionsRefworks promotion in the Netherlands, or: what criteria for bibliographic management software?Tags: refworks, reference manager, endnote, endnoteweb, citation managers, bibliographic management, connotea, zotero
This item is automatically generated from the DIGICMB Blog of Guus van de den Brekel (Source: DigiCMB)</description>
            <author>DigiCMB</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=563791</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">563791</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

