<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: enemy</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'enemy'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22enemy%22&t=%22enemy%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:22:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: June 3, 2011</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4893556&amp;cid=t_152827_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F06%2F03%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-june-3-2011%2F</link>
            <description>It&amp;#8217;s easy to slip into the &amp;#8220;coulda, woulda, shouldas&amp;#8221; of our lives. There&amp;#8217;s the trip you didn&amp;#8217;t take. The relationship you might have ended too soon. The career that sits, still waiting to be pursued.
And though it maybe difficult to admit, it&amp;#8217;s not the boss that held you back or the friend that slighted you. In fact, there&amp;#8217;s probably some true to the saying that &amp;#8220;you are your own worst enemy.&amp;#8221;
It&amp;#8217;s the weekend again. It&amp;#8217;s June. Summer is upon us. Why not take the time to reflect on why you&amp;#8217;re holding yourself back?
A few days ago, I asked our Facebook friends what&amp;#8217;s the best decision they ever made. It was one of our most popular topics and we received responses on everything from living to accepting their life....</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4893556</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:16:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4893556</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Please don't hit me when I'm down</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4238104&amp;cid=t_152827_136_f&amp;fid=39016&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fturquoisegates.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F12%2Fplease-dont-hit-me-when-im-down.html</link>
            <description>It is hard, hard, hard to have cancer for 2 1/2 years and not be healed. I have heard from so many - even those I trust and love - rebuke instead of grace and love. Yet the Bible is so clear: the faithful suffer - Job, Paul, Jesus. Suffering - even big, huge, one-upon-another trials - is not in and of itself a sign of sin. There are nights I lay awake, laying my heart bare before the Lord in prayer. Spending hours in the living room trying not to disturb my family as I pore over Scripture and weep into my Bible. Is this my fault? Could I solve this problem somehow, through my own actions? Do I need to increase my faith? Change a sin habit? Let God &quot;in&quot; somewhere I have hedged Him out of? At times, I've had to table the issue, lay it to the side, and just put one foot in front of the other....</description>
            <author>Turquoise Gates</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4238104</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:08:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4238104</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Yes, you can swallow upside down</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3655773&amp;cid=t_152827_136_f&amp;fid=39016&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fturquoisegates.blogspot.com%2F2010%2F06%2Fyes-you-can-swallow-upside-down.html</link>
            <description>...and other ways to say, &quot;life goes on.&quot;That should be the title today.When I took these photos, I imagined some creative, helium-filled happy words about the joys and simplicity of homeschooling. It was the day we learned about the digestive system and I taught the girls about peristalsis. But life intervened, and I never wrote helium-filled happiness, all through a week without seizures and preparing for a long-awaited visit from old friends, and finishing work to meet deadlines, and doing the fall and spring cleaning I missed last fall, last spring.We kept swallowing, through all those good days of hard work and elbow grease. Nothing seemed too terribly upside down. And tonight it doesn't, either - seem upside down, I mean. It's just a normal night. I can't sleep because the day was st...</description>
            <author>Turquoise Gates</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3655773</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:50:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3655773</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Estrada and Taylor on Kagan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3556069&amp;cid=t_152827_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FUlleBYNc0wc%2F</link>
            <description>By Mark MollerKagan gets an endorsement from superstar conservative appellate litigator and Bush II appellate nominee (also my old boss) Miguel Estrada here (see last paragraph).
Plus, Stuart Taylor says Kagan&amp;#8217;s nomination could mean a more conservative Court:
Commentators on the left . . . complain that Kagan never compiled much of a record of aggressively championing liberal causes during her years as a law professor. Some say she was too friendly as dean of Harvard Law School to conservatives and did not recruit as many women and minorities for the faculty as diversitycrats desired.
Speaking as a moderate independent, I like everything about Kagan that the left dislikes. To borrow from my friend Harvey Silverglate, a leading Boston lawyer who champions both civil liberties and a...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3556069</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:35:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3556069</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>To Fight Cancer, Know The Enemy</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2730323&amp;cid=t_152827_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F08%2F24%2Fto-fight-cancer-know-the-enemy%2F</link>
            <description>An Op-Ed entitled &amp;#8220;To Fight Cancer, Know the Enemy&amp;#8221; was published in The New York Times on August 6, 2009.  The author of the Op-Ed was James D. Watson, Ph.D.  James Watson co-discovered the DNA double helix structure; a discovery for which he received the 1962 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine. In the [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2730323</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:55:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2730323</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Terrorist We Should Have Prosecuted</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2570376&amp;cid=t_152827_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FYTWEc7fIpeU%2F</link>
            <description>Andy McCarthy makes a good point over at The Corner about Laith al-Khazali, a member of a Shiite militant group responsible for the deaths of American troops in Iraq. Al-Khazali has been released, allegedly as part of negotiations with terrorists holding British hostages. Senators Sessions and Kyl have questioned this action in a letter to President Obama.
McCarthy lays out the facts on al-Khazali here. Al-Khazali participated in a sophisticated attack on American troops in Karbala. The militants wore American uniforms and took American soldiers hostage. After leaving the site of the attack, the militants executed their prisoners.
Though I have disagreed with McCarthy on other issues, he makes a valid point here.
Al-Khazali is guilty of honest-to-goodness war crimes.
Wearing an enemy&amp;#8217...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2570376</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:14:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2570376</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fixing Detention</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2553006&amp;cid=t_152827_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F7UyyRIzgbNo%2F</link>
            <description>The Obama administration performed another Friday afternoon Guantanamo news dump last week, indicating that it will probably maintain administrative military detention of combatants under a forthcoming executive order.
This is unnecessary executive unilateralism. As Benjamin Wittes and Jack Goldsmith point out in today&amp;#8217;s Washington Post, this is a debate that ought to be held in Congress.
This would not be a tough push for Obama. The Obama administration already amended its claim of authority in a filing with the District Court for the District of Columbia, the judicial body sorting through the detainees remaining at Gitmo. Convincing Congress to ratify this decision should not be hard; the differences between the Bush administration&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;enemy combatant&amp;#8221; criteria and...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2553006</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:31:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2553006</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Jurisprudence of Detention: Definitions and Cases</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2398592&amp;cid=t_152827_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FOYz7MGa3phk%2F</link>
            <description>Conclusion
The cases above illustrate that the general principles of detention have not changed significantly with adjusted definitions. The terms &amp;#8220;enemy combatant,&amp;#8221; &amp;#8220;direct participation in hostilities,&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;substantial support&amp;#8221; will be interpreted by judges on a case-by-case basis much like a finding of probable cause to issue a warrant or justify a search. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2398592</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:16:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2398592</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Al-Marri Pleads Guilty</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2382262&amp;cid=t_152827_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FcaICLqS9N7s%2F</link>
            <description>Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri pleaded guilty to conspiring with al Qaeda leaders to commit acts of terrorism yesterday.  He could be sentenced up to 15 years in prison, though he has spent nearly half that awaiting trial and may get credit for the time already served.
Al-Marri was an exchange student who arrived in the United States on September 10th, 2001 as an al Qaeda sleeper agent.  Read the government&amp;#8217;s declaration of facts used to detain him.  This is the stuff of movies; the FBI took a dangerous man off the streets when it arrested him.
Unfortunately, the government took him out of the criminal justice system and asked that the charges against him be dismissed with prejudice (meaning that they cannot be re-filed in the future).  He became a domestically detained enemy combatan...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2382262</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:23:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2382262</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Supreme Court Will Not Hear al-Marri Appeal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2249690&amp;cid=t_152827_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Ff3_bKB4CWEE%2F</link>
            <description>The Supreme Court previously granted certiorari to the appeal of Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, the only enemy combatant taken into custody domestically and detained in a military brig. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that he could continue to be detained as an alleged al Qaeda operative without trial. The Supreme Court reversed its decision to hear the case today.
The Obama administration moved him back into the civilian criminal justice system, and denied that it was doing so to keep the lower domestic detainee precedent intact. It argued that denying review while vacating the Fourth Circuit&amp;#8217;s decision would serve the ends of justice. Apparently, the Court agreed.
As I have said before, domestic counterterrorism is a law enforcement task, not a military one. The Wash...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2249690</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:02:18 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2249690</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Animal Rights Violence: An Attack Against One Should be Deemed an Attack Against All</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1351932&amp;cid=t_152827_87_f&amp;fid=34825&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wesleyjsmith.com%2Fblog%2F2008%2F04%2Fanimal-rights-violence-attack-against.html</link>
            <description>In &quot;Keep Scientists Safe,&quot; neuroscience professor Jeffrey Kordower had the guts to unequivocally identify terrorism in the name of animal rights as the thuggery it is. From his column in the Chicago Tribune:Black-masked attackers disrupting a child's birthday party. A firebomb left on a doorstep. In the last six months, biomedical researchers have faced these terrifying attacks and more, with shadowy animal rights groups proudly claiming responsibility. Despite being highly regulated, peer-reviewed, crucial to public health and legal, vital research is increasingly under violent attack by activists using illegal means. It is time for the science, academic and health communities to say &quot;enough&quot; and do something about it. No researcher should experience the trauma of this kind of attack alon...</description>
            <author>Secondhand Smoke</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1351932</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:03:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1351932</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Enemy or Amity?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1218208&amp;cid=t_152827_109_f&amp;fid=35677&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FBrainBasedBusiness%2F%7E3%2F231583594%2Fenemy_or_amity.html</link>
            <description>Over at Fearless Dreams I was intrigued by a post that asked &amp;hellip;Do You Have Enemies?What a shocking reminder that &amp;hellip; we&amp;rsquo;re consumed with the idea of wars and enemies.Unfortunately this toxic mental pattern triggers and sustains fears that follow. Have you seen it? No wonder it&amp;rsquo;s easy to believe the 2005 survey by the National Institute of Mental Health &amp;hellip; that shows how 58 million people suffer from anxiety disorders.If you&amp;rsquo;ve detected people out to get you, you likely also see fellow workers as enemies. My question is &amp;hellip; Do you consider folks who offer opposing views as combatants? Have you ever noticed subtle differences between well respected firms and combatant organizations? In fighter settings ... wars arise from mere differences in culture, b...</description>
            <author>BrainBasedBusiness</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1218208</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:36:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1218208</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Kill A Scientist Today</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1094195&amp;cid=t_152827_132_f&amp;fid=35001&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nodalpoint.org%2F2007%2F12%2F14%2Fkill_a_scientist_today</link>
            <description>Is there a scientist in your laboratory (or elsewhere) you'd like to wipe out? Perhaps you know a crackpot Computer &amp;#x201C;scientist&amp;#x201D;. Or an Arrogant Physicist? Meddling mathematician maybe? Stubborn statistician? Bonkers Biologist? Kooky Chemist? You could try Nerd Sniping them, as demonstrated by Randall Munroe over at the University of XKCD.
read more (Source: nodalpoint.org - A bioinformatics weblog)</description>
            <author>nodalpoint.org - A bioinformatics weblog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1094195</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:14:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1094195</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Uh Oh Chuck, They Ain't Undahstanding You Man</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=587783&amp;cid=t_152827_109_f&amp;fid=34800&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FClinicalPsychologyAndPsychiatryACloserLook%2F%7E3%2F114004473%2Fuh-oh-chuck-they-aint-undahstanding-you.html</link>
            <description>I've had a couple people indicate confusion regarding the meaning of the titles of my posts that include &quot;Uh-Oh Chuck They Out to Get Us Man&quot;(1, 2, 3, 4, 5).&quot;Uh-Oh Chuck They Out to Get Us Man&quot; is the opening lyric from the opening track (You're Gonna Get Yours) from the classic Public Enemy album Yo! Bum Rush the Show. Chuck D was the main voice in Public Enemy (not to neglect Flava Flav's notable contributions -- including the aforementioned opening lyric), and one of the people discussed in the posts is named Charles, which could be abbreviated to Chuck, though I don't believe the Charles in my posts goes by Chuck. I wanted to find some way to throw in a PE lyric to my posts, so I did, even if it was a stretch. Next question... (Source: Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry: A Closer Look)</description>
            <author>Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry: A Closer Look</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=587783</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:12:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">587783</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

