<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: executives</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'executives'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22executives%22&t=%22executives%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:24:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Who Moved My Cheese? Keep Moving the Cheese</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4472980&amp;cid=t_182531_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F02%2F13%2Fwho-moved-my-cheese-keep-moving-the-cheese%2F</link>
            <description>Human beings are creatures of habit, which is why Spencer Johnson sold more than ten million copies of his book, Who Moved My Cheese?. Business executives sit down to PowerPoint presentations based on it, and depressed patients watch the Who Moved My Cheese? video during group therapy in hospital psychiatric units across the country. (Who would have thought corporate America and psych ward programs had so much in common?)
The story is about two mice, Sniff and Scurry, and two &amp;#8220;Littlepeople,&amp;#8221; Hem and Haw, who live in a maze of cheese stations, some filled with cheese and others empty. When Cheese Station C runs out of cheese, the two mice immediately search the maze for other cheese stations, while Hem and Haw overanalyze their situation, convinced that one day the old cheese wi...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4472980</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:17:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4472980</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hospital CIO confidence level for meeting meaningful use drops</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4259000&amp;cid=t_182531_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fhospital-cio-confidence-level-meeting-meaningful-use-drops</link>
            <description>A mid-November survey of 191 members of the College of Health Information Management Executives (CHIME) reveals that hospital CIOs are less confident they will meet Stage 1 meaningful use criteria and therefore not qualify early for EHR federal stimulus funds.
Only 15 percent of respondents, compared to 28 percent of respondents in CHIME's August survey, believe they expect to qualify in the first six months of fiscal year 2011, which began in October of this year. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4259000</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:00:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4259000</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Should Govt Regulate Executive Pay?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3880846&amp;cid=t_182531_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fr_oIT7VSI8Q%2F</link>
            <description>Every couple of weeks, the Economist conducts an on-line debate between two economists over a timely public policy issue.  This week&amp;#8217;s debate features yours truly, debating Professor Wayne Guay of the Wharton School.  The question being debated:  should government regulate the pay of corporate executives?
You probably won&amp;#8217;t be surprised to learn I take the position that government should generally stay out of regulating executive pay (or any pay).  To see my argument, just follow the link. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3880846</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:24:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3880846</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>---</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3671655&amp;cid=t_182531_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2F183640%2F</link>
            <description>BP to Blame for Spill: Lawmakers said BP leaders were solely responsible for the oil spill, calling them &amp;#8220;oblivious.&amp;#8221; (via CNN)
Post from: BlissTree (Source: Breastfeeding 1-2-3)</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3671655</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:01:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3671655</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to stabilize the health IT market with the EHR certification process</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3460260&amp;cid=t_182531_113_f&amp;fid=38236&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcareitnews.com%2Fblog%2Fhow-stabilize-health-it-market-ehr-certification-process</link>
            <description>While the College of Healthcare Information Executives (CHIME) approves of the general concept of ONC's two-stage approach for EHR certification&amp;nbsp;- a temporary and a permanent certification&amp;nbsp;- the healthcare CIO organization has problems with the details of the approach. (Source: Healthcare IT News Blog)</description>
            <author>Healthcare IT News Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3460260</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:06:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3460260</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The States Respond to ObamaCare</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3398886&amp;cid=t_182531_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fv1kB49EVIb0%2F</link>
            <description>By Roger PilonToday Politico Arena asks:
Do the 13 state attorneys general have a case against ObamaCare?
My response:
Absolutely.  It will be an uphill battle, because modern &amp;#8220;constitutional law&amp;#8221; is so far removed from the Constitution itself, but a win is not impossible.  There are three main arguments.  (1) Under the Constitution, as properly interpreted, Congress has no power to enact such a plan.  (2) The plan conscripts state governments into carrying out and paying for federal mandates.  And (3) the individual mandate amounts to an unlawful capitation or direct tax.
The first argument will almost certainly lose, because under post-1937 readings of the Commerce Clause, Congress can regulate anything that &amp;#8220;affects&amp;#8221; interstate commerce, which at some level ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3398886</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:44:57 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3398886</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Wall Street Loves Obama</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2803895&amp;cid=t_182531_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FtlWqSujwMDA%2F</link>
            <description>Was it just me, or did there seem to be a whole lot of applause during Obama&amp;#8217;s Wall Street speech?  Remember this was a room full of Wall Street executives.  The President even started by thanking the Wall Street execs for their &amp;#8220;warm welcome.&amp;#8221;
While of course, there was the obligatory slap on the wrist, that &amp;#8220;we will not go back to the days of reckless behavior and unchecked excess,&amp;#8221; but there was no mention that the bailouts were a thing of the past.  Indeed, there is nothing in Obama&amp;#8217;s financial plan that would prevent future bailouts, which is why I believe there was such applause.  The message to the Goldman&amp;#8217;s of the world, was, you better behave, but even if you don&amp;#8217;t, you, and your debtholders will be bailed out.
The president also...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2803895</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:21:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2803895</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Pay Czar at Work</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2715924&amp;cid=t_182531_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FzuIp2BgI0Is%2F</link>
            <description>Mark Calabria notes how the form of salary scheme at financial institutions played no apparent role in sparking the financial crisis.  But that hasn&amp;#8217;t stopped the federal pay czar from boasting about his power, even to regulate compensation set before he took office.
Reports the Martha&amp;#8217;s Vineyard Times:
Speaking to a packed house in West Tisbury Sunday night, Kenneth Feinberg rejected the title of &amp;#8220;compensation czar,&amp;#8221; but he also said said his broad and &amp;#8220;binding&amp;#8221; authority over executive compensation includes not only the ability to trim 2009 compensation for some top executives but to change pay plans for second tier executives as well.
In addition, Mr. Feinberg said he has the authority to &amp;#8220;claw back&amp;#8221; money already paid to executives ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2715924</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:08:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2715924</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Washington Push on Executive Pay Has Unintended Consequences</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2570380&amp;cid=t_182531_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F1o0aH394hP4%2F</link>
            <description>Regulators at the SEC and politicians on Capitol Hill seem to have short memories when it comes to executive compensation.  When the SEC years ago decided to make the compensation of top executives public information, it had the all too predictable result of actually increasing average compensation levels.  Once a top CEO knew what other CEOs were making, he could argue for a pay hike based upon being &amp;#8220;underpaid&amp;#8221;.  Of course regulators were &amp;#8220;shocked&amp;#8221; by the resulting &amp;#8220;race to the top.&amp;#8221; 
Similarly Congress was shocked when after deciding to heavily tax salaries over $1 million, that companies shifted away from direct cash pay and toward options and increased bonuses in the form of shares. 
And soon Washington will also pretend to be shocked and outra...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2570380</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:23:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2570380</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Women in the Executive Office: Job Stress &amp; Insomnia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2329685&amp;cid=t_182531_146_f&amp;fid=38266&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fsleepeducation.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F04%2Fwomen-in-executive-office-job-stress.html</link>
            <description>A new study examines the sleep quality of men and women who are executives or managers. Does job stress affect their sleep?Results suggest that female executives may be more prone to sleep problems than male executives. The risk is greatest for women who have isolated, demanding jobs.The study also shows that having a high level of control on the job reduces the risk of poor sleep quality. Social support also has a “buffering effect.” Having a strong network of social support promotes good sleep for women with a high-strain job.According to the AASM, job stress can be a cause of adjustment insomnia. This involves disturbed sleep or sleeplessness that may last for a few days or a few weeks. Other symptoms may include anxiety, worry and tension.How can you prevent job stress from disturb...</description>
            <author>Sleep Education</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2329685</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:04:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2329685</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brain Fitness Webinar Series</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1440462&amp;cid=t_182531_122_f&amp;fid=36582&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FSharpBrains%2F%7E3%2F289188628%2F</link>
            <description>I have been travelling much over the last 2 weeks to speak at a number of conferences and universities. I promised I would be sharing some of the key highlights, but we have decided to do something better to do justice to the richness and complexity of the field we cover. We are going to launch an experiment: a Brain Fitness Webinar Series.
This inaugural Brain Fitness Webinar Series will consist of 3 free live sessions. The series covers the most fundamental advances in cognitive science and their implications for individuals, companies and organizations. And we are honored to have John Medina lead of the sessions!
Each event is independent, in topic and in registration process.
Webinar #1: In “The State of the Brain Fitness Software Market, 2008,” I will provide an overview of the s...</description>
            <author>SharpBrains</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1440462</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 05:08:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1440462</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Women Avoid Math, Science and Technology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=925495&amp;cid=t_182531_109_f&amp;fid=35677&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FBrainBasedBusiness%2F%7E3%2F164745702%2Fwhy_women_avoid_math_and_scien.html</link>
            <description>Fortune tells us that women have come a long way in business and they show proof by listing the 50 most powerful women. At the same time though ...&amp;nbsp;concern grows from both men and women, over the unfortunate fact that too few women rise up in Math, Science and Engineering fields.&amp;nbsp; To find out why &amp;hellip; several top US universities looked for legitimate reasons. &amp;nbsp;Why the number gaps in math related areas, with so many gifted women around? Psychologists, Mary Murphy and Claude Steele showed how the structures of Math, Science and Engineering settings out there - play a major part in causing this gap. Do you see it too? Check out compelling details of their Stanford study. It turns out &amp;hellip; &amp;nbsp;according to research &amp;hellip; that women feel threatened to enter &amp;hellip; ...</description>
            <author>BrainBasedBusiness</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=925495</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:17:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">925495</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

