<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: expectation</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'expectation'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22expectation%22&t=%22expectation%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:32:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>One Third of a College Class Caught Cheating</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4179360&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F11%2F18%2Fone-third-of-a-college-class-caught-cheating%2F</link>
            <description>I must be getting old.
When I was in college, and then again in graduate school, there was a simple expectation. I was there to learn, the university was there to help me learn. They do that through centuries&amp;#8217; old methods &amp;#8212; teaching in classrooms, testing on that material, and occasionally having some hands-on experiences in the laboratory or on computers.
This isn&amp;#8217;t rocket science (unless you&amp;#8217;re studying rocket science). 
So why was I so surprised when I watched the video (linked to below) where a professor teaching a management class discovered a statistical anomaly while grading his classes&amp;#8217; midterm exams. His startling findings? Rampant cheating. 

Because a kind of amnesty was offered to the class of 530 students, over 200 students eventually admitted to ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4179360</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:49:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4179360</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Are Your Children Safe on Halloween?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4121919&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F10%2F31%2Fare-your-children-safe-on-halloween%2F</link>
            <description>The short answer is, &amp;#8220;Yes.&amp;#8221; At least from sex offenders.
Halloween is today. And parents around the country walk along their young children for fear of their safety. And yet, what do the data show about sex offenders offending on or around Halloween? Are they more likely to target the holiday because so many children are out and about?
Police are on alert during Halloween, especially for sex offenders. The common wisdom is that sex offenders are out and about on Halloween, looking for targets.
Researchers led by Mark Chaffin (2009) looked at the National Incident-Base Reporting System which reports crime report data. They examined sex crimes data from 1997 to 2005 against children ages 12 year and younger by non-family members.
Halloween crime rates were compared with expected ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4121919</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:43:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4121919</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>GPS Tracking and a ‘Mosaic Theory’ of Government Searches</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3862003&amp;cid=t_184360_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fem9DHbqcQio%2F</link>
            <description>By Julian SanchezThe Electronic Frontier Foundation trumpets a surprising privacy win last week in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In U.S. v. Maynard (PDF), the court held that the use of a GPS tracking device to monitor the public movements of a vehicle—something the Supreme Court had held not to constitute a Fourth Amendment search in U.S. v Knotts—could nevertheless become a search when conducted over an extended period.  The Court in Knotts had considered only tracking that encompassed a single journey on a particular day, reasoning that the target of surveillance could have no &amp;#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&amp;#8221; in the fact of a trip that any member of the public might easily observe. But the Knotts Court explicitly reserved judgment on potential uses ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3862003</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:22:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3862003</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>GPS Tracking and a “Mosaic Theory” of Government Searches</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3858137&amp;cid=t_184360_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fem9DHbqcQio%2F</link>
            <description>By Julian SanchezThe Electronic Frontier Foundation trumpets a surprising privacy win last week in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In U.S. v. Maynard (PDF), the court held that the use of a GPS tracking device to monitor the public movements of a vehicle—something the Supreme Court had held not to constitute a Fourth Amendment search in U.S. v Knotts—could nevertheless become a search when conducted over an extended period.  The Court in Knotts had considered only tracking that encompassed a single journey on a particular day, reasoning that the target of surveillance could have no &amp;#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&amp;#8221; in the fact of a trip that any member of the public might easily observe. But the Knotts Court explicitly reserved judgment on potential uses ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3858137</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 01:22:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3858137</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Myth of More: Why It Won’t Make You Happier</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3790951&amp;cid=t_184360_180_f&amp;fid=38612&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fpickthebrain%2FLYVv%2F%7E3%2FDvcLNRaR0fI%2F</link>
            <description>Photo Credit: Gabrielle Esperdy

We&amp;#8217;re taught that, in almost every area of life, having more is the key to happiness.
Not satisfied with your job? That&amp;#8217;s because you want more money.
Unhappy with your home? You want more space.
Bored of your gadgets and DVDs and computer games? You want more of them.
As you&amp;#8217;ve probably experienced in your own life, though, simply having more doesn&amp;#8217;t tend to make you any happier. If you&amp;#8217;ve ever received a pay raise – only to end up increasing your spending too – you&amp;#8217;ll know that if you aren&amp;#8217;t satisfied on $40,000 you&amp;#8217;re unlikely to be satisfied on $50,000.
And if you&amp;#8217;ve ever bought a new gadget or game, convinced that it&amp;#8217;s going to make you happy, you&amp;#8217;ll have noticed how quickly the thri...</description>
            <author>PickTheBrain | Motivation and Self Improvement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3790951</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:21:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3790951</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Revise the Maryland Wiretap Law?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3625477&amp;cid=t_184360_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FEfeSoF-BG8M%2F</link>
            <description>By David RittgersAs I said in this piece in the Baltimore Sun, Maryland police officers are misusing that state’s wiretap law to deter anyone who would film them performing their duties. Maryland officers have asserted that any audio recording of a conversation, even in a public place, is a violation of the state’s wiretapping law and a felony punishable by five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. Officers made this claim to deter filming of an arrest at the Preakness, and when motorcyclist Anthony Graber videotaped his traffic stop.
As Radley Balko points out, the officers’ reading of the law is out of step with the language of the statute itself and Maryland rulings interpreting the scope of the law. Is it time for a revision of this law, or is it just the officers’ interpretatio...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3625477</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:49:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3625477</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: May 14, 2010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3566662&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F05%2F14%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-may-21-2010%2F</link>
            <description>Is it too late for spring fever? Those of you who are anticipating the end of a school year or an upcoming vacation (based on the tweets of our Twitter followers and Facebook friends there are a lot of you) will love this end of the week list of top posts.
Why?
Because we&amp;#8217;ve got tips on how to get motivated, build your confidence, open yourself up to the possibility of love and make use of all that time you&amp;#8217;ve spent sitting, waiting and dreaming of something you&amp;#8217;d rather be doing instead of what you&amp;#8217;re doing right now. So here we go!
How the Moments You&amp;#8217;re Missing Can Lead to a Better Life
(Mindfulness &amp; Psychotherapy) &amp;#8211; In between point A where you are and point C where you want to get to, there&amp;#8217;s point B the here and now. Learn how to embrace...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3566662</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:33:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3566662</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: May 21, 2010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3564028&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F05%2F14%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-may-21-2010%2F</link>
            <description>Is it too late for spring fever? Those of you who are anticipating the end of a school year or an upcoming vacation (based on the tweets of our Twitter followers and Facebook friends there are a lot of you) will love this end of the week list of top posts.
Why?
Because we&amp;#8217;ve got tips on how to get motivated, build your confidence, open yourself up to the possibility of love and make use of all that time you&amp;#8217;ve spent sitting, waiting and dreaming of something you&amp;#8217;d rather be doing instead of what you&amp;#8217;re doing right now. So here we go!
How the Moments You&amp;#8217;re Missing Can Lead to a Better Life
(Mindfulness &amp; Psychotherapy) &amp;#8211; In between point A where you are and point C where you want to get to, there&amp;#8217;s point B the here and now. Learn how to embrace...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3564028</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:33:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3564028</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Health And Medicine: Scientific Or Miraculous?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3542602&amp;cid=t_184360_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fhealth-and-medicine-scientific-or-miraculous%2F2010.05.06</link>
            <description>I was recently listening to an audiobook about diet, written and read by a “famous” doctor who gets people healthy through dietary changes.
Since my podcast pushes me a little into the mainstream (more than this blog does), I thought it would be good to hear what the “average” person is reading about health. Plus, I am not exactly the most compliant patient when it comes to diet, so I thought I could possibly get something out of it personally.
I did my best to listen with an open mind, ignoring what I thought were gimmicks and trying to glean the valuable information from what this doctor was saying.
I had to stop, however, before finishing the book. It wasn’t the content so much that gave me cause to feel the desire to smash my iPod, it was the hype. The author was constantly u...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3542602</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 01:00:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3542602</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>On Fourth Amendment Privacy: Everybody’s Wrong</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3306819&amp;cid=t_184360_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FTY8S8vDkpz8%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperEverybody&amp;#8217;s wrong. That&amp;#8217;s sort of the message I was putting out when I wrote my 2008 American University Law Review law review article entitled &amp;#8220;Reforming Fourth Amendment Privacy Doctrine.&amp;#8221;
A lot of people have poured a lot of effort into the &amp;#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&amp;#8221; formulation Justice Harlan wrote about in his concurrence to the 1967 decision in U.S. v. Katz. But the Fourth Amendment isn&amp;#8217;t about people&amp;#8217;s expectations or the reasonableness of their expectations. It&amp;#8217;s about whether, as a factual matter, they have concealed information from others&amp;#8212;and whether the government is being reasonable in trying to discover that information.
The upshot of the &amp;#8220;reasonable expectation of privacy&amp;#8221; form...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3306819</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:42:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3306819</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More Drugs Prescribed, But Seniors’ Prescriptions Double</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2389934&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F05%2F05%2Fmore-drugs-prescribed-but-seniors-prescriptions-double%2F</link>
            <description>News out today shows that psychiatric prescriptions have risen 73 percent in adults and 50 percent for children in the 1996 to 2006 time period. Seniors&amp;#8217; prescriptions for medications such as antidepressants and atypical antipsychotics during the same time period doubled (something that USA Today strangely terms as a &amp;#8220;spike,&amp;#8221; despite it occurring over a decade).
The problem with this data is that we really don&amp;#8217;t have much to compare it to. Is a 7 percent annual increase in psychiatric prescriptions over a 10 year time period indicative of over-prescribing and effective pharmaceutical marketing? Or would we expect a similar increase no matter what? (Sadly, no researchers track &amp;#8220;prescriptions&amp;#8221; of psychotherapy, so we don&amp;#8217;t even have other treatment m...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2389934</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:24:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2389934</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Negative Anticipation Set Up For Worry</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2313543&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F04%2F06%2Fnegative-anticipation-set-up-for-worry%2F</link>
            <description>Last night I was worried about a work thing that I felt less than ideally prepared for. Some parts were fine, but others worked against my weaknesses. In short, I was pretty worried. When I went in to work, it all went better than I expected. Some bumps in the road, but it was a great learning experience with good support. I knew this in my head going in, but I was still worried. And I was still somewhat worried about doing it the next time. So if my logic tells me it&amp;#8217;s likely to be OK, why did I still get so worried?
Worrying is feeling anxious about something that could or will happen in the future. The emotion usually includes fear of either something specific or of the unknown. Your heart beats faster, you might feel sweaty, and you often feel a sense of physical tension in your ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2313543</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:55:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2313543</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>More Thoughts On Motherhood and Depression</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2240890&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F03%2F05%2Fmore-thoughts-on-motherhood-and-depression%2F</link>
            <description>The post I wrote earlier only seemed to stir up more thoughts about depression and motherhood. Of course, you could insert whatever mental illness into the place of depression and many of the consequences and outcomes would be similar. So here goes round two of motherhood and depression from a mom who&amp;#8217;s been there.
Many women feel the pressure to be supermoms &amp;#8212; do it all with a smile and have it all at the end of the day. This is so difficult to fulfill that women often feel like they come up short. Somewhere somehow something has to give. Many families certainly have to sacrifice to make ends meet, and especially now the economy isn&amp;#8217;t making it any easier. But it&amp;#8217;s just this type of &amp;#8220;be everything to everyone&amp;#8221; kind of expectation that can get moms in a ...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2240890</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:29:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2240890</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Great Expectations</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2039944&amp;cid=t_184360_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F12%2F16%2Fgreat-expectations%2F</link>
            <description>&amp;#8220;We only become what we are by the radical and deep-seated refusal [to be] that which others have made of us.&amp;#8221;
~Jean-Paul Sartre

	While I’m happy that the election turned out the way it did, I worry about all that’s expected of our new president-elect. Headlines report Obama is expected to solve the health care debacle, save the American car industry, right the mortgage problem, make science and education a priority again, keep the globe from warming, cure race relations… There’s more but you get my point.
	A lot of these expectations Obama set upon himself. He won by being the adult in the room, the go-to guy; he wanted the job and we expect he can handle it. 
	But it got me thinking about the rest of us. When is the pressure of expectations a good thing? When is it b...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2039944</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:00:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2039944</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The New Placebo: Prescribing Positive Expectations with Real Drugs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1964600&amp;cid=t_184360_107_f&amp;fid=36585&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FHighlightHEALTH%2F%7E3%2Fv1PX-vIx6ag%2F</link>
            <description>This article was published on Highlight HEALTH.          Other Articles You May LikeWhat You Believe Can Kill YouThe Cancer Genome Atlas Reports Molecular Characterization of Brain TumorsThe Promise of Stem Cells to Repair the HeartMapping Connections in the Human BrainIncreased Coffee Consumption Associated with Lower Risk of Liver Cancer (Source: Highlight HEALTH)</description>
            <author>Highlight HEALTH</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1964600</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:09:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1964600</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

