<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: fail</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'fail'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22fail%22&t=%22fail%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:05:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>The Situation of Antitrust Law</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5107616&amp;cid=t_178724_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F08%2F09%2Fthe-situation-of-antitrust-law%2F</link>
            <description>Maurice E. Stucke recently posted his thoughtful paper, &amp;#8220;Reconsidering Antitrust&amp;#8217;s Goals&amp;#8221; on SSRN.  Here&amp;#8217;s the abstract.
* * *
Antitrust policy today is an anomaly. On the one hand, antitrust is thriving internationally. On the other hand, antitrust’s influence has diminished domestically. Over the past thirty years, there have been fewer antitrust investigations and private actions. Today the Supreme Court complains about antitrust suits, and places greater faith in the antitrust function being subsumed in a regulatory framework. So what happened to the antitrust movement in the United States?
Two import factors contributed to antitrust policy’s domestic decline. The first is salience, especially the salience of the U.S. antitrust goals. In the past thirty yea...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5107616</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 05:54:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5107616</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hoenig for FDIC</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4883558&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FOQRfT8bXzW4%2F</link>
            <description>By Mark A. CalabriaOn July 8th, Sheila Bair will step down as Chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).  While I believe she&amp;#8217;s gotten a lot wrong (such as not preparing the fund for the coming crisis), she has been about the only voice among senior bank regulators for actually ending too-big-to-fail.  With her departure, we might lose that one voice.  Later this year, Kansas City Fed President Tom Hoenig is also scheduled to leave his current position.
Hoenig has actually gone beyond Bair in trying to address too-big-to-fail, having called for the largest banks to be broken up.  While I don&amp;#8217;t believe that should be our first approach, having an advocate for both the taxpayer and the overall economy at the helm of the FDIC could make a significant difference...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4883558</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:09:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4883558</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) Will Fail To Reduce Costs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4813286&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fwhy-accountable-care-organizations-acos-will-fail-to-reduce-costs%2F2011.05.11</link>
            <description>In an ideal world ACOs should work. There is no evidence that  untested and complex organizational structure of ACOs developed by Dr. Don Berwick (head of CMS) will improve quality of care and reduce costs.
ACOs are supposed to provide financial incentives to health care organizations to reduce costs and improve quality. There are too many defects in the ACOs infrastructure to improve the financial and medical outcomes.
At a conceptual level, the incentive for ACOs would be to increase efficiency and avoid overuse and duplication of services, resources, and facilities. In this model, ACO members would share the savings resulting from the increased coordination of care.
I have said over and over again that excessive administrative fees and ineffective management of chronic disease is the m...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4813286</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 18:00:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4813286</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Non-Clinician Misinterpretation of DTC Genetic testing</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4636598&amp;cid=t_178724_131_f&amp;fid=35743&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthegenesherpa.blogspot.com%2F2011%2F03%2Fnon-clinician-misinterpretation-of-dtc.html</link>
            <description>Ok,In case you haven't all figured it out. Blogs are dead. Mine is too, sorta. I have less and less time to blog as my practice explodes. But there are some things that just merit a blog post.I am on twitter, you can follow me there @genesherpasBut now I am on the Sherpa. Yes, the blog that nearly got me on 60 Minutes and definitely won me the hearts of USA Today to be interviewed...BTW the practice got super busy after that......Today I want to talk about something more serious. The FDA hearings have laid the course clear. Direct To Consumer Genetic testing will be regulated. Why? 1 part potential harm2 parts irreverence for laws and medical regulation 3 parts flagrant misrepresentation of what genetic tests can do.......See Kari S. Disavowal of his company's stupid tag line.......Today o...</description>
            <author>Gene Sherpas: Personalized Medicine and You</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4636598</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:06:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4636598</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Insurers Force How Much Generic Switching?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4225655&amp;cid=t_178724_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FF-sSQsuvSc0%2F</link>
            <description>As more big-selling, brand-name meds fall off the patent cliff, lower-cost generics are destined to become more popular, yes? And a known side effect of this development is that more insurers are using this transformation to force doctors and patients to switch to generics. But to what extent?
A new survey of 10,842 patients by the non-profit advocacy group shows that up to 70 percent of prescriptions written by doctors are forcibly changed by health insurers. Complete results have not yet been released, but Global Healthy Living Foundation says that, since sometimes generics are not identical to brand-name meds, the findings suggest some patients with chronic conditions are being placed at risk because they relapse after being switched to a cheaper drug.
&amp;#8220;This disturbing finding is ...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4225655</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:36:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4225655</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to Use Failure to Succeed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4225716&amp;cid=t_178724_180_f&amp;fid=38612&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fpickthebrain%2FLYVv%2F%7E3%2FngcP1mvWf_g%2F</link>
            <description>Conclusion
Decide to take charge of your life and become the success you deserve to be.
Don&amp;#8217;t let anything or anyone stand in the way of your goals. Do what it takes and learn from every speed bump on the way.
If you want to read more articles like this visit http://lookingtobusiness.com I recommend you start with these articles as they are Daniels best on &amp;lt;a href=”http://lookingtobusiness.com”&amp;gt;Sales Technique, Motivation and Success&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;.
Don&amp;#8217;t Forget To Follow  PickTheBrain on Twitter! 
:
Reclaim  Your Dream, It&amp;#8217;s Time to Come Alive 
Why  You Should Read Personal Development Books (Source: PickTheBrain | Motivation and Self Improvement)</description>
            <author>PickTheBrain | Motivation and Self Improvement</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4225716</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:20:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4225716</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>7 Things I’ve Learned in 7 Years of Marriage</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4142807&amp;cid=t_178724_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F11%2F07%2F7-things-ive-learned-in-7-years-of-marriage%2F</link>
            <description>A little while ago, my wife and I celebrated seven years of marriage. While ours is a good, healthy relationship, it&amp;#8217;s also had its share of ups and downs like any other. With half of all marriages seemingly doomed to failure, here are seven things I&amp;#8217;ve learned so far from being married.
It may help to know that neither of us have been married previously, and we both entered into our marriage with an understanding about the commitment that a marriage &amp;#8212; for it to last &amp;#8212; takes. So all of the things I&amp;#8217;ve learned are based upon the belief that marriage is a serious, long-lasting commitment &amp;#8212; not a reason to throw a party, or to &amp;#8220;try on&amp;#8221; new relationships for awhile.
Many of the tips below work not just for marriage, but any long-term, committed r...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4142807</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:55:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4142807</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Prevention Magazine’s Inaccurate “Coffee Cures” Story</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3933089&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Fprevention-magazines-inaccurate-coffee-cures-story%2F2010.09.03</link>
            <description>The September issue of Prevention magazine inaccurately headlines the story &amp;#8221;4 Ways Coffee Cures.&amp;#8221; There&amp;#8217;s no solid proof that coffee cures anything &amp;#8212; unless some of you cure bacon with java, which I don&amp;#8217;t want to know about.
What the story (below) did was to try to present a cute little graphic summary of observational studies that show a statistical association between increasing coffee consumption and fewer early deaths, fewer deaths from heart attack, fewer cases of dementia, and fewer cases of type 2 diabetes.
But such observational studies (they actually never cite the source &amp;#8212; I&amp;#8217;m just giving them the benefit of the doubt that they&amp;#8217;re citing observational studies) CAN&amp;#8217;T establish cause and effect, therefore it&amp;#8217;s inaccura...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3933089</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:00:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3933089</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Data #fail</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3614646&amp;cid=t_178724_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F05%2F31%2Fdata-fail%2F</link>
            <description>Unique, yet identical to each other
Filed under: humour, publications Tagged: article, fail, journals (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3614646</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 06:40:01 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3614646</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>7 Quick Tests To Pick EHR Features That Doctors Will Like: Part 2</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3019096&amp;cid=t_178724_113_f&amp;fid=36504&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FMedicalRecordShow%2F%7E3%2F_sAap8VbDls%2F</link>
            <description>You&amp;#8217;re halfway home. Part 1 discussed Tests 1-4, for picking physician-friendly EHR features &amp;#8212; and avoiding those that would incite a riot.
5. Pare With Care
Eventually, you&amp;#8217;ll feel tempted to carve away what seem like excesses &amp;#8212; don&amp;#8217;t do it! Not without checking at least three times!
Scut step reduction always gets a PASS, if by &amp;#8220;scut&amp;#8221; you mean &amp;#8220;multiple steps that are invariably done in a sequence that can&amp;#8217;t go otherwise.&amp;#8221;
So if you ALWAYS sign-off a lab value by

 removing it from your lab listing
tasking a staffer to notify the patient
instructing the staffer on what new action the patient must take

then it makes sense to carve away 2 of those steps, and to have a single button that does all 3.
If at any point, however, somet...</description>
            <author>The EMR/EHR Show: Making Your Electronic Medical Records Really Work</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3019096</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:47:39 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3019096</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Too Big to Fail Redux</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2916085&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FvG64SGU-Y8w%2F</link>
            <description>Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, has shocked the staid world of British banking by raising the possibility of breaking up the UKs big banks. Mr. King is no socialist, but a worried banking regulator. He is worried about &amp;#8220;the sheer creative imagination of of the financial sector to think up new ways of taking risk.&amp;#8221;
Around the world, regulators and finance ministers are hoping that banks will grow their way out of their current mess. To do so, however, banks will in fact need to seek new ways of taking on risk. It is called going for broke: the upside goes to stockholders and managers, and the downside to taxpayers. Mr. King knows that it is a &amp;#8220;delusion&amp;#8221; that regulators can control bank risk-taking.
Whether one agrees with his solution, at least he recog...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2916085</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2916085</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Someone Failed… Is it the System? Everyday EMS Ethics</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2842549&amp;cid=t_178724_101_f&amp;fid=38972&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FLifeUnderTheLights%2F%7E3%2FDGczC1OqpgQ%2Fsomeone-failed-is-it-system-everyday.html</link>
            <description>(Source: Life Under the lights)</description>
            <author>Life Under the lights</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2842549</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:46:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2842549</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>MR Fail</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2745545&amp;cid=t_178724_115_f&amp;fid=37661&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnottotallyrad.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fmr-fail.html</link>
            <description>We who work around MR scanners well know that odd sensation when something you forgot to take out of your pocket starts tugging you firmly toward the giant magnet.Most of us have also idly speculated about the following question...So, what if you actually did push a really big ferromagnetic object into the scan room?This picture from Fail Blog pretty well answers that question.Hat tip to Better Health. (Source: Not Totally Rad)</description>
            <author>Not Totally Rad</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2745545</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:12:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2745545</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Too Risky to Continue</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2681878&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FW9fhTflpsiE%2F</link>
            <description>The profits being reported so far this year by the major financial firms appear to be driven by proprietary trading (trading for their own account, as opposed to those of their customers). The recent $3.44 billion profit of Goldman Sachs in the second quarter is a dramatic case in point.
Proprietary trading is a high-risk activity and signals the financial sector is returning to its bad old ways. Returns cannot be systematically high unless risk is correspondingly high.
None of this would matter if it were just private capital at stake. But Goldman, along with other major financial firms, is being guaranteed under the dubious doctrine that it is too-big-to-fail. Better there were no government guarantees. As long as these guarantees are in place, however, high-risk activity must be curtail...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2681878</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:37:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2681878</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>As much as we love technology, we have to be careful…</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2678886&amp;cid=t_178724_155_f&amp;fid=38406&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FThe1xObjective%2F%7E3%2FqC3ZAG64JpM%2F</link>
            <description>On the lighter side of things...

Catch the rest of the story after the break... (Source: The 1x Objective)</description>
            <author>The 1x Objective</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2678886</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:04:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2678886</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Clinical Reader, a Fancy New Aggregator – But All is not Gold that Glitters</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2663908&amp;cid=t_178724_86_f&amp;fid=38272&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flaikaspoetnik.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F08%2F03%2Fclinical-reader-a-fancy-new-aggregator-but-all-is-not-gold-that-glitters%2F</link>
            <description>Before I went on vacation (July 14th) I started a blogpost about Clinical Reader, a new aggregator. However, a twitter riot -started July 13th- drastically changed my view of Clinical reader and I decided to await further developments till my return. Alas, things have only worsened. 
The adapted blogpost consists of two parts: a neutral [...] (Source: Laika's MedLibLog)</description>
            <author>Laika's MedLibLog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2663908</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 05:12:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2663908</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Too Big to Fail</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2570381&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FFLnyxQ0sxGQ%2F</link>
            <description>One of the most pernicious public policies aggravating the financial crisis is that of “too big to fail.” The doctrine states that some banks (now financial institutions generally) are so large that their failure would incur “systemic risk” for the financial system. That sounds terrible and it is intended to. Financial services regulators and Treasury secretaries use it to frighten small children and congressmen. How can an elected official vote to incur systemic risk? He must vote to approve the bank bailout of the day. In fact, people who use the term cannot even agree among themselves as to what it means, much less what causes it and, therefore, what the appropriate response would be. I suggest the reader substitute the phrase “too politically connected to fail” whenever he ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2570381</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:57:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2570381</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Twitter vs. the Baroness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2523484&amp;cid=t_178724_122_f&amp;fid=34736&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FChannelN-PodcastsPoweredByOdiogo%2F%7E3%2F6qDYhPQ-Zlw%2F756.html</link>
            <description>The Baroness, Consciousness, and the Twitterverse: A Conversation with Susan Greenfield
Greenfield recommends pub debates or rants on street corners instead of using social media. Quote: &amp;#8220;How sad that a species that previously wrote novels and expressed themselves in thousand word letters, are now having to encapsulate important or interesting ideas in 150 [sic] characters, and that&amp;#8217;s the first issue. And if you are used to doing that, are you going to start living your life in windows of 150 characters? And I do find that rather sad. Secondly, there&amp;#8217;s many ways in which you can have debates and discussions. You can go to the pub, you can go out to the street, you know, you can go to universities, you can come to the Royal Institution in London. There&amp;#8217;s many, many p...</description>
            <author>Channel N</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2523484</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:00:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2523484</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Libertarian Dilemma</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2473195&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F5YSZF6r4Fok%2F</link>
            <description>What is to be done with the nation’s largest financial institutions, 19 of which have been officially designated as “too big to fail?” When thus guaranteed government protection, such institutions can be expected to take excessive risk and generally operate recklessly. Profits on risky ventures remain privatized, while losses become socialized. That is what happens when you bet with other people’s (that is, taxpayers’) money. I have called the system “casino capitalism.”
The solution, of course, is to end the policy of “too big to fail.” That will not happen soon, however, and we will likely see the government’s safety net extended to more institutions before there is any prospect for its withdrawal. In the interim, the risk-taking appetite of the large banks must be co...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2473195</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:28:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2473195</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Top 10 Reasons Nobody Follows You On Twitter</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2463537&amp;cid=t_178724_180_f&amp;fid=38604&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fmakeitgreat%2F%7E3%2FCbClho2PHqU%2F</link>
            <description>I try to follow all the real people I can on Twitter. If I see you mentioned from one of my friends, I&amp;#8217;m going to check you out. If you send a tweet to @philgerb, I&amp;#8217;m going to check you out. If I do a search for something and you come up, I&amp;#8217;m going to check you out.
I will not follow you. And I thought I better let you know why.

1) You don&amp;#8217;t have a real avatar - PLEASE upload a picture before you follow anyone. The default looks spammy and fake&amp;#8230;and that&amp;#8217;s NOT who you are if you&amp;#8217;re a real person. I won&amp;#8217;t follow you if you don&amp;#8217;t have a real avatar.
2) You have more than 4 consonants or vowels in a row in your handle - Are you a real person if you create a handle like @jklsafjlk35 or @3523434kjklsa ? NOPE. I&amp;#8217;m not going to follow yo...</description>
            <author>Phil Gerbyshak</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2463537</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:00:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2463537</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>5 Things To Do When Twitter Fails</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2463538&amp;cid=t_178724_180_f&amp;fid=38604&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2Fmakeitgreat%2F%7E3%2FnIgmaa2sR0A%2F</link>
            <description>Last night, Twitter was down for about an hour. They said it was down due to some &amp;#8220;fatal software error.&amp;#8221; Honestly, I don&amp;#8217;t care why it was down. I just know it was down, and I use Twitter for a lot of my research and for a lot of my contact with the rest of the world.
I&amp;#8217;d consider it a primary source of my business, and I spend about 60 minutes or so a day on Twitter, sometimes even more. If your business relies on Twitter as a primary source of advertising specials, or if your services relies on Twitter to communicate to your customers, or worse, if your business relies on Twitter for ALL it&amp;#8217;s business, you&amp;#8217;re probably not very happy when Twitter service fails.
It&amp;#8217;s a free service. It&amp;#8217;s GOING to fail sometimes. I wish that weren&amp;#8217;t tr...</description>
            <author>Phil Gerbyshak</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2463538</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:32:10 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2463538</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The silent killer, hbp</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2442048&amp;cid=t_178724_117_f&amp;fid=38158&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Famericanacupuncture.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F05%2Fsilent-killer-hbp.html</link>
            <description>As a medical physician for over 50 years, I strive to give you the best medical information on controversial medical subjects and let you, the reader, come to your own conclusions. I have no ties to any organization, pharmaceutical, or lobby group. As an practicing medical acupuncturist since 1982, I find western medicine and medical acupuncture are very complimentary that results in astounding healing in pain management, addictions to cigarettes and food, and a host of other maladies. Let me know how we are doing. Your constructive comments are always appreciated. Click the RSS post button on the upper right hand corner if you would like to receive by email our future medical blogs. Visit http;//www.americanacupuncture.com/ for more detailed information on healing.THE SILENT MEDICAL KILLE...</description>
            <author>Dr. Needles Medical Blogs</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2442048</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:01:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2442048</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Whale of a Disgraceful ED Budget</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2398590&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FfIPFc09EpwQ%2F</link>
            <description>Tad DeHaven does a fine job of exposing the mere window dressing that are the cuts in President Obama’s FY 2010 budget proposal. I’ll not add much to that other than to say that while Tad gives Obama’s predecessor a deserved hard time for his own paltry efforts to rein in spending, President Bush’s Education Department  budgets looked downright Draconian compared to what the Obama team just produced.
Bush’s FY 2009 ED budget proposal included nearly $3.3 billion in cuts, generated by eliminating 47 programs. Given the dismal performance of all federal education efforts, this was obviously far too little, but compare it to Obama: His proposed budget would cut just twelve measly programs from ED’s budget, for a puny savings of about $551 million. And if that doesn’t give yo...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2398590</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:00:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2398590</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New Year’s Resolutions - More Trouble Than They Are Worth?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2073982&amp;cid=t_178724_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthbolt.net%2F2009%2F01%2F02%2Fnew-years-resolutions-more-trouble-than-they-are-worth%2F</link>
            <description>So, have you made your New Year&amp;#8217;s resolutions yet?
You know, the &amp;#8216;I&amp;#8217;m going to lose weight, stop smoking, go to the gym, eat healthier, be nicer, get richer, etc, etc, etc&amp;#8217; type of resolutions.
If you have, good luck. I&amp;#8217;ll keep my fingers crossed for you.
And if you haven&amp;#8217;t, my advice is &amp;#8216;don&amp;#8217;t bother&amp;#8217;.
Did you know that most people who make New Year&amp;#8217;s resolutions fail dismally within the first month or two of the new year?
A UK study of 3,000 people found that in the end, only about 400 managed to stay on track and achieve their resolutions.
That&amp;#8217;s pretty grim statistics.
Why so bad?
Well, according to all the &amp;#8216;experts&amp;#8217;, it&amp;#8217;s mostly because we&amp;#8230;
- have too many resolutions
- the resolutions are too va...</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2073982</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 07:15:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2073982</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Depression Introspection Returns and Why Blogs Fail</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1388973&amp;cid=t_178724_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F04%2F21%2Fdepression-introspection-returns-and-why-blogs-fail%2F</link>
            <description>One of our favorite blogs (in fact, one of the ones we named &amp;#8220;Best of the Web&amp;#8221; in the Depression category) is back &amp;#8212; depression introspection.
	I very much like her response, Response to &amp;#8220;Mental Health Blogs Going Bye-Bye?&amp;#8221;, to Philip&amp;#8217;s Furious Seasons&amp;#8217; entry about where do mental health blogs go to, since it seems like they come and go with a fair amount of regularity (even amongst the professionals).
	Here are a few of my own observations, which echo some of Marissa&amp;#8217;s thoughts&amp;#8230;
	1. Blogging well is hard. Blogging poorly is easy. Having a blog that is nothing but links to news stories (as some medical blogs I follow do) is easy. Commenting on those links with some intelligence and insight and more than 10 words is hard. Blogging intell...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1388973</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:07:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1388973</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>1 in 5 Vets from Gulf May Have PTSD or TBI</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1383717&amp;cid=t_178724_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2008%2F04%2F18%2F1-in-5-vets-from-gulf-may-have-ptsd-or-tbi%2F</link>
            <description>The devastating numbers released by researchers today suggest not only that approximately 1 in 5 returning U.S. soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan may have posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or a traumatic brain injury (TBI), but also that veterans often fail to seek care for these problems.
	The study was conducted by the RAND Corporation and suggests that hundreds of thousands of our soldiers may need significant mental health care now and in the foreseeable future. The research put the total societal cost of such care for these individuals upwards of $5 to $6 billion.
	The real problem, of course, is that most soldiers won&amp;#8217;t bother seeking treatment for these concerns, because of the significant stigma that still exists within the military. Whether your&amp;#8217;s a private or an o...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1383717</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:51:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1383717</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>My cunning plan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=794187&amp;cid=t_178724_93_f&amp;fid=34787&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthegirlwiththebluesteth.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F08%2Fmy-cunning-plan.html</link>
            <description>Final exams are looming, and I am rather . . . behind.Luckily, I have made a Study Plan! It is guaranteed to succeed. I know this for a fact, because:1) I made it up on my computer;2) It is in the form of a table, with official-looking columns and rows;3) I have used fancy lettering;4) If it doesn't succeed, I will be in Big Trouble;5) There is no way in HELL that I am going back to my old job permanently, and as such, I am driven by a big scary monster called FEAR;6) The last exam was bloody painful, and I would like this one to be slightly less so.Huzzah! It can't fail! (Source: The Girl with the Blue Steth)</description>
            <author>The Girl with the Blue Steth</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=794187</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:21:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">794187</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

