<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: farm bill</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'farm bill'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22farm+bill%22&t=%22farm+bill%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:38:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Will the GOP Finally Cut Farm Subsidies?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4934121&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fpw9c0aAgXos%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel GriswoldWith trillion dollar deficits and mounting federal debt, will Congress finally get serious about cutting farm subsidies? We’ve been disappointed before, but there are a few hopeful signs—like the front-page story in this morning’s Washington Post—that this Congress may be serious about cutting billions in payments to farmers. As the Post reports:
In their recent budget proposals, House Republicans and House Democrats targeted farm subsidies, a program long protected by members of both parties. The GOP plan includes a $30 billion cut to direct payments over 10 years, which would slash them by more than half. Those terms are being considered in the debt-reduction talks led by Vice President Biden, according to people familiar with the discussions.
The Post story pro...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4934121</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:20:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4934121</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The (Beginning of the) End of the Shameful U.S. Cotton Deal?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4893417&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FD9pbEbw8h1s%2F</link>
            <description>By Sallie JamesHeartening news from the Appropriations Committee yesterday: they voted to cut aid to farmers generally, and to make significant changes to an egregious cotton program. But first, some background.  You&amp;#8217;ll recall the embarrassing deal made by the Obama administration last year to head off Brazil&amp;#8217;s right to impede American exports in retaliation for WTO-illegal cotton support. The United States is, in other words, now sending almost $150m worth of &amp;#8220;technical assistance&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;capacity building&amp;#8221; funds to Brazil, just so we can continue to subsidize American cotton growers without penalty (so much for U.S. promotion of the rule of law in international commercial relations). Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI) tried to end that deal earlier this year, but...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4893417</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:46:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4893417</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Rep. Frank Lucas (R-Farm Subsidies)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4337908&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FGE5MNSlFpJg%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenThe Washington Times says that the upcoming farm bill re-write could “sow division in the GOP.” While House Republican leaders John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Kevin McCarthy voted against the 2008 farm bill, the new chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, Frank Lucas (R-Okla.), is a dedicated supporter of farm subsidies.
The Times recalls Boehner’s comments on the 2008 farm bill:
“The farm bill has often been abused by politicians as a slush fund for bizarre earmarks and wasteful spending projects, and the latest version &amp;#8230; is no different,” Mr. Boehner, then the GOP minority leader, said at the time.
It’s too bad then that the Boehner-friendly Republican Steering Committee, which decided the committee chairs, didn’t appear to blink at handing the agric...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4337908</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:39:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4337908</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Are Tea Partiers Anti-trade?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4245287&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FJC0c-yGFhaI%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel GriswoldWhere will the new Tea-Party-backed members of Congress come down on trade issues, such as the newly revised trade agreement with South Korea or the next farm bill?
Those elected to the House are the biggest question marks because very few of them have had to think much about trade, never mind actually cast a vote on it. In an op-ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer this week, I try to discern what direction the new members will take the generally pro-trade Republican Party, and which direction they should take it in light of the movement&amp;#8217;s free-market, limited-government principles.
For my full take, see “Are Tea Partiers Anti-trade?”
Are Tea Partiers Anti-trade? is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4245287</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:44:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4245287</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Post-Election Outlook: Agriculture Edition</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4133671&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FDeOi65dU6nM%2F</link>
            <description>By Sallie JamesMy colleagues have done a thorough job of analyzing the policy implications of Tuesday&amp;#8217;s federal election outcome as it affects trade policy, health care, immigration, education, and the scope and size of government generally (more here on federal spending). Most of them are cautiously optimistic that a Republican-controlled House is good news for liberty-minded folk. Let&amp;#8217;s hope so.
Unfortunately, there are fewer obvious reasons for optimism that Tuesday&amp;#8217;s result will mean big changes in agricultural policy, a depressingly bipartisan area of federal intervention. Even Rand Paul, the poster child for the Tea Party, expressed &amp;#8220;moderate&amp;#8221; views on farm subsidies during his campaign.
On the positive side of the ledger, our friends at the Envir...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4133671</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:19:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4133671</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Navigating Your Farmers Market</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3687379&amp;cid=t_125572_167_f&amp;fid=38271&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Frebeccascritchfield.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F06%2F11%2Ffarmers-market-finds%2F</link>
            <description>One of my favorite parts of summer is shopping at the Farmers Market. Farmers Markets are a great place to find fresh, local and sustainable produce. Not only are you shopping in a very environmentally friendly manner, but this also a great chance to get to know the people that grow your food. And the taste of fresh fruit and vegetables in your meals can not be equaled by anything in the supermarket! Here are some tips to make the most out of your farmers market trip!

Find a Market Close to You! Local Harvest will help you find farmers&amp;#8217; markets, family farms, and other sources of sustainably grown food in your area, where you can buy produce, grass-fed meats, and many other things!
Bring a Reusable Bag-So you can load up on veggies without wasting paper or plastic
Chat it up! Get to...</description>
            <author>Balanced Health and Nutrition Rebecca Scritchfield's Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3687379</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:31:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3687379</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Organic Food: Is It Better For You?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3603591&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=39187&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetbetterhealth.com%2Forganic-food-is-it-better-for-you%2F2010.05.27</link>
            <description>In 1952 Martin Gardner, who just passed away this week at the age of 95, wrote about organic farming in his book Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. He characterized it as a food fad without scientific justification. Now, 58 years later, the science has not changed much at all.
A recent review of the literature of the last 50 years shows that there is no evidence for health benefits from eating an organic diet. The only exception to this was evidence for a lower risk of eczema in children eating organic dairy products. But with so many potential correlations to look for, this can just be noise in the data.
Another important conclusion of this systematic review is the paucity of good research into organic food –- they identified only 12 relevant trials. So while there is a lack of ...</description>
            <author>Better Health</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3603591</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 12:00:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3603591</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cheap Talk from a Fiscal Commissioner</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3515335&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FUDM234-0uLQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenThe president’s fiscal reform commission started off with some breathtaking chutzpah from Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND):
Rising federal debt is like a tsunami that could swamp the country at any moment…Our economic strength and security is on the line. Now is the time to act. And we need everyone, Democrats and Republicans, working together on a solution.
If now is the time to act, why did Sen. Conrad just pass a budget plan out of his committee that promises massive spending, deficits, and debt?
From a transcript of Conrad’s opening remarks:
I personally believe that saying, ‘everything is on the table’ is critical. I hope none of us will take things off the table prematurely, because I think it is clear it’s going to take dramatic changes o...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3515335</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:46:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3515335</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Peterson (Finally) Changes His Tune</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3487044&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F4VC4OgGr6Zk%2F</link>
            <description>By Sallie JamesI&amp;#8217;ve written before about Rep. Collin Peterson&amp;#8217;s (D, MN) disdain for the World Trade Organization, and its rulings against U.S. farm programs. However, in launching his 2012 Farm Bill listening tour, the Brownfield blog reports that he sees that perhaps some changes might be necessary after all. And, lo and behold, he cites the WTO rulings as the reason:
One of the key issues [in the 2012 Farm Bill] will be what to do about the way that cotton farmers are subsidized. The committee’s chairman, Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., said today that the cotton program will have to be overhauled in the wake of Brazil’s successful challenge to the subsidies at the World Trade Organization. The Obama administration agreed to change the program in a deal to avert retalia...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3487044</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:46:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3487044</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Change You Can Be Deceived In</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3235821&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F3RcaiyzvnDs%2F</link>
            <description>By Sallie JamesThis priceless quote from Barack Obama comes from 2007 apparently, but is depressingly instructive:
We need to stand up to the special interests, bring Republicans and Democrats together, and pass the farm bill immediately
From Jacob Sullum at Reason, via Megan McArdle (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3235821</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:38:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3235821</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Food Stamps = Economic Driver?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3216566&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FEmoAYlv-QkA%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenIt’s become standard fare for senior government leaders to declare that any and all subsidies are good for economic growth. Two weeks ago it was the Economic Development Administration’s John Fernandez. This week it’s USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack in a speech to the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
From GovExec.com:
In his speech, Vilsack called the increase in supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits &amp;#8220;an economic driver&amp;#8221; that helps truckers, grocery stores and farmers. Those benefits, which used to be known as food stamps, have gotten the most funding of any USDA program.
Vilsack also cited increased funding to bring high-speed Internet service to rural America; accelerated implementation of the energy title of the farm bill; and USDA investments in small,...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3216566</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:48:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3216566</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Agricultural Exceptionalism</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3212316&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fqd8-53IOb_4%2F</link>
            <description>By Sallie JamesHouse Agriculture Committee Chairman Colin Peterson (D, Sugarbeet Farmers) announced yesterday [$] that he would begin hearings on the 2012 Farm Bill this spring. I&amp;#8217;m still recovering from the traumatizing 2008 Farm Bill fight, so I heard this news with some trepidation.
But wait! Put those red pens away, folks, because Chairman Peterson plans to keep on spending on agricultural programs. Heaven forbid that agriculture should take any of those &amp;#8220;cuts&amp;#8221; we&amp;#8217;ve been hearing so much about :
House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, D-Minn., said&amp;#8230; he is determined to write a bipartisan bill that is within the funding baseline that exists in 2012.
The funding baseline is the amount of money that the Congressional Budget Office determines wo...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3212316</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:56:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3212316</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Hell Freezes Over (Or At Least Gets Cooler)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3089260&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F6-Rob9CAzpQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Sallie JamesWell here&amp;#8217;s an interesting, if three-weeks-old, story. Apparently the North Dakota Farm Bureau&amp;#8217;s annual convention recently passed a policy calling for the elimination of all agricultural programs.  Reading between the lines of the original press release indicates that the call was part of a broad political position by the NDFB to move away from government intervention in many areas of the economy apart from farm programs, including cap-and-trade and health care:
“As people in this country expect more from the government and less from themselves, our delegates are urging everyone, including farmers, to step away from the public trough and get back to the principles of individual responsibility and initiative,” said NDFB President Eric Aasmundstad&amp;#8230;.
...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3089260</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:51:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3089260</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>If At First You Don’t Succeed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2954491&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FeY5mHHxTn2w%2F</link>
            <description>Mexican sugar growers want &amp;#8220;in&amp;#8221; on the cozy little arrangement that domestic sugar growers have here in the United States.  They have formed an alliance with the U.S sugar lobby to recommend that the U.S. and Mexican governments work to &amp;#8220;avoid importing sugar from other countries to help boost the market between the neighbours&amp;#8221; (full article here [$]).
This proposal is not new, of course, having previously been suggested to lawmakers&amp;#8217; during the 2008 farm bill debate (see here). The &amp;#8220;recommendation&amp;#8221; was rebuffed at that time, but these people are nothing if not tenacious.
In what surely must be a contender for the &amp;#8220;Understatement of the Year&amp;#8221; award, the article ends with this: &amp;#8221; Sweetener users and free trade advocates are ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2954491</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:37:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2954491</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Obama Administration Sides With Special Interests and Status Quo on Sugar Imports</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2715920&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FUrtpVTrB35Q%2F</link>
            <description>Pardon me while I pile on the post earlier today by my colleague Sallie James about the Obama administration refusing to allow more sugar to be imported to the United States. The U.S. Department of Agriculture this week declined to relax the quotas the federal government imposes on imported sugar despite soaring domestic prices and understandable complaints from U.S. confectioners and other sugar-consuming businesses about potential shortages.
For all his talk about change, President Barack Obama has shown no inclination to pursue meaningful reform of U.S. agricultural programs. He supported the subsidy-laden and protectionist farm bill that finally passed Congress in 2008. On the eve of the U.S. presidential election in October 2008, he wrote a letter to the U.S. sugar industry reminding ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2715920</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:49:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2715920</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Situation of Food: The Movie</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2570575&amp;cid=t_125572_109_f&amp;fid=36089&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fthesituationist.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F07%2F03%2Fthe-situation-of-food-the-movie%2F</link>
            <description>From Michael Phillips&amp;#8217; Chicago Tribune review: Several things &amp;#8212; too many, probably &amp;#8212; are going on in &amp;#8220;Food, Inc.,&amp;#8221; all connected. Kenner begins by tracing the impact of 20th Century American fast food on industrialized food production, and notes that when McDonald&amp;#8217;s brought factory assembly-line strategies into practice, everything changed. McDonald&amp;#8217;s became a universe of beef-purchasing power unto itself. Their cows, like so many millions of other feedlot residents, consume corn instead of grass; the humans in our increasingly obese nation eat a ton of corn as well, courtesy of high-fructose, heavily subsidized corn syrup found in everything from ketchup to Twinkies to Coke. As a Brooklyn, N.Y., doctor in another food doc, &amp;#8220;King Corn,&amp;#8221;...</description>
            <author>The Situationist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2570575</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:01:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2570575</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Not-so-COOL Rules Stoke Xenophobia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2263782&amp;cid=t_125572_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F80euALkVotE%2F</link>
            <description>Come Monday you can thank the federal government for making food more expensive by requiring retailers to provide useless information.
On March 16, federal regulations will finally kick in that require perishable food at the grocery store to sport “country of origin labeling,” known as COOL. The rules were originally passed by Congress as part of the 2002 farm bill, but are only being implemented now because of understandable resistance from retailers.
The COOL regulations will require that all perishable food products be labeled at retail to indicate the country of origin. The regulations cover beef, pork, lamb, goat, chicken; wild and farm-raised fish and shellfish; fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables; peanuts, pecans, macadamia nuts, and ginseng.
In a recent statement announcing ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2263782</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:44:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2263782</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

