<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: fda warning letter</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'fda warning letter'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22fda+warning+letter%22&t=%22fda+warning+letter%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:50:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>A Valeant Pharma Unit Has Problems Making Drugs</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5069824&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F5ktd4wPgYzs%2F</link>
            <description>Valeant Pharmaceuticals has been on an acquisition spree, but perhaps the Canadian drugmaker may want to conduct a bit more due diligence before its next purchase. One of its recent deals was for Sanitas, which is based in Lithuania and controls Jelfa, another drugmaker based in Poland and that actually produces much of the Sanitas portfolio (read this). Valeant is paying about $455 million in cash (see here and here).
However, a July 14 warning letter issued by the FDA to Jelfa notes that the Polish drugmaker has some basic problems with quality control. During an October 2010 inspection, the FDA found Jelfa did not thoroughly investigate the failure of a batch or any of its components to meet specifications, which the agency called an unacceptable practice. The FDA then offered a tutoria...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5069824</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:35:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5069824</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Keeps Scolding Vaccine Maker To No Avail</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4953360&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FJ_ALGGujptA%2F</link>
            <description>If at first you don&amp;#8217;t succeed, try, try again? Last year at this time, the FDA chastised CSL, a big maker of flu vaccines based in Australia, for flunking an inspection that found several manufacturing deficiencies and, in addition to demanding a summary of corrective actions, agency officials took the unusual step of demanding a meeting with senior execs to review their plan (back story). 
Apparently, such meetings have absolutely no impact. The FDA has just issued a warning letter as a follow up to a March 2011 inspection, which generated a 483 report showing that CSL has no idea how to properly conduct an investigation to determine why fevers and convulsions were reported after children were given its products. Just the same, the FDA wants another meeting.
But how bad was the effo...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4953360</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:09:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4953360</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Apotex Creeps Out Of The FDA Dog House</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4848152&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FIJJqdimReMk%2F</link>
            <description>Two years after the FDA warned Apotex about severe manufacturing problems at one of its plants, the agency has issued a so-called close out letter that, essentially, gives the drugmaker a green light to resume shipments to the US. However, the FDA notice did not mention problems cited with another plant that were noted in a separate warning letter issued to Apotex last year (read the close out letter).
The move may largely end a difficult episode for had been one of the biggest providers of generic drugs to the US. A June 2009 warning letter detailed numerous lapses, notably failing to fully investigate why batches of various products did not meet specifications. Three months later, the FDA issued an import alert for all meds made at this facility and the other plant, which was the subject...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4848152</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:43:34 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4848152</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The FDA, The EMA &amp; A Miscreant Drugmaker</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4813675&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FMOvCGSP2Uq4%2F</link>
            <description>Timing, as they say, is everything. On April 14, Octapharma announced that the European Medicine Agency&amp;#8217;s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use had recommended lifting a six-month-long, EU-wide suspension of its Octagam biologics, which are used for treating primary humoral immunodeficiency, myeloma or chronic lymphatic leukaemia.
Why was there a suspension in the first place? Last September, regulators noticed an unexpectedly high number of reports of thromboembolic events in patients using the meds (see here). But last month, Octopharma announced the CHMP had decided the Swedish drugmaker had taken &amp;#8220;appropriate corrective measures&amp;#8221; at its manufacturing sites (read here).
However, on April 15, the FDA issued a warning letter as a follow-up to inspections that to...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4813675</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:38:29 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4813675</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>An API Supplier Practices Revisionist History</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4753970&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FN7yYPeyVrt4%2F</link>
            <description>During a lengthy inspection last fall of a supplier of active pharmaceutical ingredients, the FDA found something curious. The Baltimore facility run by ChemPacific, which also has operations in China, was failing to complete batch records for various lots of Norepinephrine Bitartrate. Entries were incomplete or missing, records were backdated and the in-house quality unit failed to detect the problems.
In other words, ChemPacific was cited for playing fast and loose with its paperwork. In one specific example, the FDA noted that Chinese characters signifying a “need to change” were written on different batch records. And someone at the supplier told FDA investigators that the characters indicated these marked pages were to be replaced with a corrected batch record page. 
Interestingly...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4753970</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:00:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4753970</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>J&amp;J Faces $360M Penalty Over Risperdal Marketing</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4627022&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2Fzsc31rHAVPw%2F</link>
            <description>A South Carolina state court jury decided late yesterday that a Johnson &amp;#038; Johnson unit violated consumer protection laws by sending doctors a misleading letter in 2003 about the safety and effectiveness of the Risperdal antipsychotic. The jurors also found warning label info was deceptive. And so a judge will now decide whether $360 million in penalties will be paid, Bloomberg News writes.
South Carolina argued J&amp;#038;J&amp;#8217;s Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals unit engaged in &amp;#8220;unfair and deceptive acts&amp;#8221; by claiming Risperdal was better than competing drugs in the letter, which was sent to some 700,000 doctors nationwide, including 7,200 in the state. The FDA issued J&amp;#038;J a warning letter about false and misleading claims that minimized risks, such as diabetes, and o...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4627022</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:05:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4627022</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>When A Clinical Trial Goes Awry, ‘Fire The Nurse!’</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4622503&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F_nQ1_zS9Qoc%2F</link>
            <description>As we know, doctors who sign up as clinical trial investigators have certain responsbilities. These include, but are not limited to, protecting the rights, safety and welfare of participants; ensuring the control of drugs used in the trial, personally conducting the trial and supervising other activities. However, while certain tasks can be delegated, general responsibilities may not.
But one doctor failed to follow through. To wit, he relied on a research nurse to carry out all sorts of things back in 2007. Such as? The nurse signed his name on protocol documents, including a financial disclosure form and two serious adverse event reports. Meanwhile, two of four subjects did not meet eligibility criteria. Yet, the doctor was apparently unaware until another research nurse told him.
As the...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4622503</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:12:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4622503</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Taro Pharmaceutical's &quot;Bag O' Glass&quot; Moment</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4610994&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=34889&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpharmamkting.blogspot.com%2F2011%2F03%2Ftaro-pharmaceuticals-bag-o-glass-moment.html</link>
            <description>I don't know who's &quot;stupider&quot; -- Taro Pharmaceutical, which published an OVIDE lotion branded comic book for kids without including warnings or the FDA, which sent the company a notice of violation letter because it did not include warnings such as &quot;OVIDE Lotion is flammable?!&quot;Holy cow! Flammable?! Even with the warning, Taro should never promote this product in a &amp;nbsp;comic book aimed at kids!It sort if reminds me of the Saturday Night Live &quot;Bag O' Glass&quot; skit featuring toy manufacturer Irwin Mainway, played byDan Aykroyd and Consumer Reporter played by Candice Bergen. Consumer Reporter: So, you don't feel that this product is dangerous?Irwin Mainway: No! Look, we put a label on every bag that says, &quot;Kid! Be careful - broken glass!&quot; I mean, we sell a lot of products in the &quot;Bag O'&quot; line....</description>
            <author>Pharma Marketing Blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4610994</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4610994</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>‘There Is A Louse In Your House… And Your Ad’</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4610999&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FBdZ5Bc9I_LI%2F</link>
            <description>There are oversights&amp;#8230; and then there are oversights. Somehow, though, Taro Pharmaceuticals forgot to include all of the warnings about its Ovide lotion for treating lice in a promotional children&amp;#8217;s book distributed at the 2010 American Academy of Physician Assistants conference in Atlanta, and in material submitted to the FDA.
What kind of warnings? Well, Ovide is not the sort of item you would want to simply hand a child. For instance, the lotion should only be used with adult supervision; the lotion is flammable, so its best to stay away from hair dryers if the child has wet hair; never use Ovide with anyone who is sensitive to the active ingredient, and if swallowed - well, you know - seek immediate medical attention. But not one word of these cautionary messages shows up in...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4610999</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:41:59 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4610999</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA To Novartis: Ciba Vision Needs An Eye Exam</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4600797&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FjAzjWgOAy2w%2F</link>
            <description>Some of the employees at the CIBA Vision facility in Cidra, Puerto Rico, appear to have trouble seeing straight. The FDA recently sent a warning letter to the unit, which makes contact lenses, for failing to notice inconsistent product labeling. Moreover, the short-sighted staff also continued to use two contract labs even after determinng the companies were responsible for earlier sterility failures.
&amp;#8220;During the period of March through May 2010 your firm opened three CAPAs (corrective and preventive actions) to address issues related to distributed products which had labeling inconsistencies. These deficiencies were not detected by your quality inspectors even though your procedures require that quality assurance inspectors verify if the label rolls have the correct expiration date,...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4600797</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:31:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4600797</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Warns Sanofi For Failing To Report Side Effects</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4507579&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FVDH6IuJdeJY%2F</link>
            <description>You read it here first. In a harsh warning letter, the FDA has reprimanded Sanofi-Aventis for failing to meet regulatory deadlines for reporting serious side effects with many of its drugs, including the Lovenox blood thinner, the Multaq heart drug and the Allegra D allergy pill, and also did not report post-marketing studies or completed, unpublished clinical trials in NDA annual reports. The seven-page missive, which was dated January 28, comes after the agency reviewed Sanofi paperwork last May. And a separate letter dated February 9 notes that a Sanofi plant in Germany has problems with contamination.
When it came to reporting adverse events, however, some reporting delays stretched back as far as 2007 - there was a delay of 896 days in reporting side effects associated with the Glybur...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4507579</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:42:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4507579</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Warns Novartis Over Flu Vaccine Promotion</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4478161&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FE4YxlSrSI60%2F</link>
            <description>The use of language is a subtle art. Ask any regulator. And the regulators at the FDA have determined that Novartis was a bit too subtle, perhaps, in trying to promote its Fluvirin vaccine for the flu. The agency recently issued a warning letter that chastised the drugmaker for distributing a sales aid and print advertisement that were deemed misleading.
Specifically, the promotional materials incorrectly characterized a published recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and implied the Novartis vaccine can be used in all age ranges covered by the ACIP recommendations, according to the FDA letter, which was issued on February 4.
For the current flu season, the ACIP recommended annual vaccination including infants who ...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4478161</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:22:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4478161</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Baxter: A Long Way To Zero Manufacturing Gaffes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4450520&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FkraFUdPQ2ig%2F</link>
            <description>Two weeks ago, Baxter Healthcare ceo Bob Parkinson disclosed to analysts that he received a warning letter from the FDA concerning problems at two plants in Puerto Rico. This is an embarassment and then some for Baxter, which was at the center of the contaminated Heparin scandal nearly three years ago that led to deaths and intense scrutiny of FDA oversight (back story).
And so Parkinson made a point of mentioning the January 20 letter since it had not yet been disclosed publicly. Not surprisingly, he chose not to dwell on the contents, but did acknowledge the agency took issue with the way Baxter investigated unspecified &amp;#8220;issues,&amp;#8221; conveyed post-marketing reports and other &amp;#8220;relevant information.&amp;#8221; However, he stressed there were &amp;#8220;no reported patient adverse eve...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4450520</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:23:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4450520</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Warns Gilead About Manufacturing Problems</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4018445&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FtabhHuqmFnw%2F</link>
            <description>Gilead Sciences just can&amp;#8217;t get it right. Earlier this year, the FDA inspected its San Dimas, California, facility, which yielded a so-called 483 inspectional report citing various problems with the agency&amp;#8217;s Good Manufacturing Practices. The biotech responded but to no avail. The FDA has now issued a warning letter and Gilead may be forced to curtail exports of the AmBisome antifungal treatment.
The problems, which were noted in a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, include control systems and monitoring, procedures to prevent microbiological contamination and preventative cleaning and equipment maintenance. Quality procedures and controls were also noted for certain lots of the Viread AIDS med and the overall &amp;#8220;effectiveness&amp;#8221; of the plant in carryi...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4018445</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:15:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4018445</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>From Botox To Acuvail: Allergan Violates Another Law</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3973114&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F2VKEYVGzqQs%2F</link>
            <description>Just as Allergan pleads guilty to a misdemeanor for misbranding in relation to off-label promotion of its widely used Botox (see this), the drugmaker was also tagged by the FDA for running an ad for its Acuvail anti-inflammatory that the agency deemed misleading for overstating efficacy and omitting risk information.
Acuvail is an non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or NSAID, that is used Acuvail is used to treat pain and inflammation after cataract surgery. But a recent two-page ad - which features a row of four diamonds that range from small and dull to large and sparkly - suggests the drug has “enhanced&amp;#8221; and is superior to other ocular NSAIDs. The FDA, however, says this isn&amp;#8217;t so, and goes on to spank Allergan for implying Acuvail improves outcomes and patient comfort, a...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3973114</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:30:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3973114</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA To Baxter: Start Telling The Truth</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3921072&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F4G-9Di_UofA%2F</link>
            <description>File this under three strikes and you&amp;#8217;re out: Baxter Healthcare was dinged by the FDA for circulating a brochure for its Aralast NP emphysema treatment that contains misleading efficacy claims. As many of you know, this sort of overstatement is not all that unusual, but in Baxter&amp;#8217;s case, well, the FDA has about had it.
In its Aug. 3, warning letter, the agency points out that Baxter is a corporate recidivist. &amp;#8220;We are very concerned by your continued violative promotion of your products,&amp;#8221; the agency writes. &amp;#8220;Baxter was cited for similar violations (overstatement of efficacy and unsubstantiated claims of superiority) in an April 14, 2009, Warning Letter and a July 7, 2008, Untitled Letter from OCBQ (the Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality).&amp;#8221; 
And so...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3921072</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:28:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3921072</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Will Ranbaxy Pay A Big Fine To End FDA Problems?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3903129&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2FTnk_tZYOS78%2F</link>
            <description>Two years after the FDA came down hard on Ranbaxy Laboratories, the generic drugmaker is reportedly offering to make a sweeping, one-time penalty payment in hopes of convincing the agency to allow shipments of various drugs to the US to resume. Such a payment, which is usually tied to a consent decree, may constitute as much as 20 percent of revenue over the past three years. The news was reported on MoneyControl and Ranbaxy officials refused to comment, but did not deny the report (watch the video here). We await a reply from the FDA.
You may recall that, two years ago, federal prosecutors cited the Indian drugmaker for allegedly falsifying records that resulted in the production and sale of meds failing to meet FDA standards. The allegations included fabricating bioequivalence and stabil...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3903129</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:39:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3903129</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Warns Amgen Over DTC Brochure</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1924714&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F436851712%2F</link>
            <description>The agency sent the biotech a warning letter for using what it called a &amp;#8216;false and misleading&amp;#8217; consumer brochure to promote its Sensipar kidney med to patients. The problem? The brochure &amp;#8220;omits and minimizes the risks associated with the use of Sensipar and broadens the indication for Sensipar,&amp;#8221; according to the letter.
For instance, Amgen failed to note that Sensipar, which is used to treat patients undergoing dialysis for chronic kidney disease, is associated with the risk of adynamic bone disease and poses a risk to patients with hepatic impairment, the FDA letter states. And these are serious risks (here is the brochure).
For its part, Amgen says it will address FDA concerns. &amp;#8220;We immediately ceased distribution of the brochure. Amgen is committed to respon...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1924714</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:05:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1924714</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Issues a Warning Letter to LabCorp Regarding The Illegal Marketing of The OvaSure™ Test</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1860605&amp;cid=t_139590_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F10%2F08%2Ffda-issues-a-warning-letter-to-labcorp-regarding-the-illegal-marketing-of-the-ovasure%25e2%2584%25a2-test%2F</link>
            <description>On September 29, 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety (OIVD), Center for Devices and Radiological Health, issued a warning letter (FDA Warning Letter) to the Chief Executive Officer of the Laboratory Corporation of America (LabCorp) regarding the illegal marketing of the OvaSure™ ovarian cancer [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1860605</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:39:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1860605</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Warns Forest Labs Over Bystolic Ads</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1782899&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F387607769%2F</link>
            <description>The FDA sent a warning letter last month to the drugmaker for promoting its Bystolic high blood pressure med to docs without properly noting the medication&amp;#8217;s risk. An 8-page ad, which ran in various medical journals, also implied the drug is better than rival meds even though there is no substantial evidence to prove such claims.
&amp;#8220;Although the journal ad does include important safety information on its second page, it omits and minimizes certain risks,&amp;#8221; wrote Thomas Abrams, head of the FDA&amp;#8217;s Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communications in the August 28 letter, which noted the ad specifically left off a warning about the drug&amp;#8217;s use in patients with congestive heart failure.
The FDA also noted the ad claimed that the beta-blocker works better for p...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1782899</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:19:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1782899</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Warns Novartis About Manufacturing Plant</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1734253&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F375315658%2F</link>
            <description>The FDA sent a warning letter on August 12 to the drugmaker&amp;#8217;s Sandoz generic unit about a failure to properly validate the manufacturing process for a copycat version of AstraZeneca&amp;#8217;s Toprol XL, a blood pressure medication, which it makes a North Carolina plant.
&amp;#8220;We question the continued distribution of this product until better process controls are implemented and process validation is completed,&amp;#8221; the FDA wrote to Sandoz ceo Bernard Hampl. &amp;#8220;We are also concerned that the problems noted in the metoprolol validations could be indicative of problems and poor decisions made with other product validations.&amp;#8221;
A Novartis spokesman tells Reuters the FDA&amp;#8217;s concerns were &amp;#8220;primarily about documentation and validation. We are working together with the F...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1734253</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:39:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1734253</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Glaxo Slapped By FDA For Tykerb Campaign</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1052570&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F191229872%2F</link>
            <description>The agency sent a warning letter to the drugmaker for omitting and minimizing the most serious risks, and selectively stating efficacy info, in letters that were sent to docs as part of a promotional campaign. The campaign began shortly after the FDA approved Tykerb as a treatment for certain patients with advanced breast cancer. (Here&amp;#8217;s the evidence).
In its Nov. 21 letter (which you can read here), the FDA notes the promo letters &amp;#8220;minimize the important risk of decreased left ventricular ejection fraction,&amp;#8221; which measures of the amount of blood pumped out of one section of the heart. The Glaxo letter also failed &amp;#8220;to present the most serious and important risk information,&amp;#8221; including warnings about pregnancy, patients with liver impairment and diarrhea.
&amp;#822...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1052570</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:59:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1052570</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sanofi-Aventis Receives Warning Letter over Ketek</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=979218&amp;cid=t_139590_97_f&amp;fid=35050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmaGazette%2F%7E3%2F174962703%2Fsanofiaventis_receives_warning.html</link>
            <description>The FDA sent a warning letter to Sanofi&amp;#39;s CEO Gregory Irace accusing the company of knowingly having submitted clinical data had &amp;quot;multiple and significant violations of FDA regulations&amp;hellip; that affected the integrity of data submitted&amp;quot;.After the FDA required more information on Ketek following fears that it could cause liver damage, data obtained as part of a postmarketing study by Pharmaceutical Product Development was submitted on behalf of Aventis prior to its merge with Sanofi-Synthelabo.At the heart of the matter is Dr Anne Kirkman-Campbell who in 2004 was convicted of fraud regarding&amp;nbsp;patient enrollment and fake consent forms during the Ketek study. The issue also raised concerns in Congress and a former Pharmaceutical Product Development employee testified that...</description>
            <author>PharmaGazette</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=979218</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:15:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">979218</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Pharmalot… Pharmalittle… Good Evening</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=903791&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F161314401%2F</link>
            <description>Apologies for signing off so late tonight. We were gainfully occupied with sundry tasks and time slipped away. Nonetheless, here we are with a few items to help you sleep better. We wish you sweet dreams&amp;#8230;
Chinese Drugmaker And API Supplier Gets FDA Warning Letter (FDA Warning Letter)
Crucell Denies Blame For Merck&amp;#8217;s HIV Vaccine Flop (Yahoo/Reuters)
India Tells Pfizer To Drop Prices Of Two OTC Drugs (The Business Standard)
Share / E-mail (Source: Pharmalot)</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=903791</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:58:33 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">903791</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Novartis Slapped By FDA Over Exelon</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=800177&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F144373788%2F</link>
            <description>The drugmaker received a warning letter that a professional file card, which is basically promotional material, overestimated the effectiveness of its Alzheimer&amp;#8217;s med, contained misleading info concerning risks and unsubstantiated superiority claims, and recommended an unapproved combo with another drug. You can look at the file card here.
&amp;#8220;These violations are concerning from a public health perspective because they suggest that Exelon is safer or more effective than has been demonstrated, and they encourage the use of Exelon in circumstances other than those for which the drug has been shown to be safe and effective,&amp;#8221; wrote Tom Abrams, who heads the FDA&amp;#8217;s Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising and Communications, in the letter to Alex Gorsky, who heads Novartis p...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=800177</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:06:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">800177</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FDA Spanks Pfizer For Schizo Drug Ad</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=797221&amp;cid=t_139590_150_f&amp;fid=35777&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FPharmalot%2F%7E3%2F143781157%2F</link>
            <description>The drugmaker omitted important risk info and made unsubstantiated claims that Geodon is better than another drug, according to a July 16 warning letter posted on the FDA web site. And the agency asked Pfizer to stop running the ad, which appeared in an unnamed medical journal.
The FDA wrote that the ad, which you can see by clicking on this link, included some info about potential side effects from the injectable version of Geodon, but didn&amp;#8217;t mention &amp;#8220;other serious warnings and precautions,&amp;#8221; such as the possibility of neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tardive dyskinesia, hyperglycemia and diabetes.
The ad also suggested Geodon was more effective than a generic drug, haloperidol, &amp;#8220;when this has not been demonstrated by substantial evidence or substantial clinical expe...</description>
            <author>Pharmalot</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=797221</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:45:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">797221</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

