<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: fdr</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'fdr'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22fdr%22&t=%22fdr%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:54:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Homeownership Before the New Deal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4489646&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fkn09vYMttp4%2F</link>
            <description>By Mark A. CalabriaThe latest canard offered for keeping taxpayers on the hook for mortgage risk is that, without such, homeownership would limited to the wealthy.  Sarah Rosen Wartell of the Center for American Progress stated before the House Subcommittee on Capital Markets, &quot;The high cost, limited availability, and high volatility of pre-New Deal mortgage finance meant that homeownership was effectively limited to the wealthy.&quot;  Congressman Al Green repeated the point.  As I've generally found Sarah to be one of the more reasonable CAP employees, and that this is fundamentally an empirical question, I would have expected her to offer some evidence to support such a claim.  Alas, she did not.  So I will.
According to the US Census Bureau, at the turn of the century in 1900, the US h...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4489646</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:52:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4489646</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Toward Restoring Constitutional Government</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4318316&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fv3Wt14owxPE%2F</link>
            <description>By Roger PilonToday POLITICO Arena asks:
In light of today&amp;#8217;s reading of the Constitution in the new House, what misinterpretations of the Constitution do you regularly see in American politics? And are House Republicans implying that the previous Democratic majority did not have a firm grasp of the government&amp;#8217;s founding document?
My response:
Thanks to the Tea Party, as I wrote in Tuesday&amp;#8217;s Wall Street Journal, Congress seems to be rediscovering the Constitution &amp;#8212; or at least many House Republicans seem to be. When members read the document aloud today, apparently for the first time in the nation&amp;#8217;s history, they&amp;#8217;ll be throwing down a marker: &amp;#8220;We take the Constitution seriously, and intend to abide by its principles.&amp;#8221; If true, how refreshing....</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4318316</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:14:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4318316</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ObamaCare Is Undermining Economic Recovery, Job Growth</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3714165&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FsgMQt2rrrkY%2F</link>
            <description>By Michael F. CannonIn a recent Wall Street Journal oped, Carnegie-Mellon economist Allan Meltzer explains how ObamaCare is delaying economic recovery:
Two overarching reasons explain the failure of Obamanomics. First, administration economists and their outside supporters neglected the longer-term costs and consequences of their actions. Second, the administration and Congress have through their deeds and words heightened uncertainty about the economic future. High uncertainty is the enemy of investment and growth&amp;#8230;
Mr. Obama has denied the cost burden on business from his health-care program, but business is aware that it is likely to be large. How large? That&amp;#8217;s part of the uncertainty that employers face if they hire additional labor&amp;#8230;
Then there is Medicaid, the medical...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3714165</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:02:38 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3714165</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Uncertainty More Than Anecdotal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3695550&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FLpOi2PFO104%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenDuring a recent CNBC debate on federal spending, I argued that government policies are creating uncertainty in the business community. Businesses are reluctant to invest or hire because they’re concerned that the president’s big government agenda will mean higher taxes and more onerous regulations.
I mentioned that every business owner I’ve spoken with has expressed this concern. In fact, the owner of the TV studio I was in told me that he wants to hire more employees but is afraid he may have to turn around and fire them later on thanks to Washington. My debate opponent dismissed my argument on the basis that “you cannot conduct macroeconomic policy by anecdote.”
Unfortunately, there is plenty of evidence to support my concern beyond what I’ve heard from folks in...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3695550</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:38:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3695550</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Washington Post Cites ‘Regime Uncertainty’</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3644748&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FjytfBRBiAuE%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenI’ve been arguing for a while that “regime uncertainty” is stifling the economy’s ability to recover. Businesses are more reluctant to invest or hire when Washington pursues a policy agenda that could be detrimental to their bottom lines. The phrase was coined by economist Robert Higgs who observed that FDR’s anti-business policies prolonged the Great Depression.
Unfortunately, the media has generally ignored the possibility that uncertainty being generated by the president’s policies has been contributing to the nation’s continuing economic problems. However, an editorial in yesterday’s Washington Post could be a welcome sign that the media is beginning to take notice:
But as analysts ponder the mystery of weak private-sector hiring despite signs of economic ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3644748</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:34:26 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3644748</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cutting Government Spending in a Recession</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3463581&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FR5vqWx39lqY%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenOne of the topics Chris Edwards will be discussing with Glenn Beck this evening (5:00 EST, Fox) is the “Not-So-Great Depression” of 1920-21.
Cato Senior Fellow Jim Powell notes that President Warren G. Harding inherited from his predecessor Woodrow Wilson “a post–World War I depression that was almost as severe, from peak to trough, as the Great Contraction from 1929 to 1933 that FDR would later inherit.”
However, instead of calling for bigger government to right the economy, as President Obama did upon inheriting George Bush’s mess, Harding pushed for spending and tax cuts.
The result?
With Harding&amp;#8217;s tax and spending cuts and relatively non-interventionist economic policy, GNP rebounded to $74.1 billion in 1922. The number of unemployed fell to 2.8 million...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3463581</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:23:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3463581</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Read It Like a Man: Conspiracy Theory Books</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3453870&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fread-it-like-a-man-conspiracy-theory-books%2F</link>
            <description>photo: Thinkstock
Patrick Sauer is funny. This is his second &amp;#8220;Read It Like a Man&amp;#8221; weekly column for Blisstree. Read the first installment here.

Chapter 2: Conspiracy Theories
The Overton Window is a political theory that goes something like this: Previously unaccepted theories become more mainstream when ideas from the fringe are thrown out, thus making the previously stated ideas seem less radical and extreme. (It&amp;#8217;s also the title of Glenn Beck&amp;#8217;s upcoming novel, natch.) The Overton Window explains why conspiracy theories are no longer the provenance of loons and how they root themselves in mainstream thought. In a word, the Internet. Remember a year ago when everyone believed in global warming? HOAX!
So, conspiracy theories are everywhere, but they&amp;#8217;re losing...</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3453870</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:02:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3453870</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Was Bill Clinton Also an “Extremist” on Trade?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3197610&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F46Mw8U1RmtU%2F</link>
            <description>By Daniel GriswoldThis has not been a good week for the national Democratic Party. Along with losing the Massachusetts Senate seat, the party took another step toward making hostility to trade liberalization a plank of party orthodoxy.
As my Cato colleague Sallie James flagged earlier today, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee issued a press release yesterday criticizing a Republican candidate in upstate New York for contributing to the Cato Institute. And, of course, everyone knows that Cato is “a right wing extremist group that has long been a vocal advocate for extremist, unfair trade policies that would allow companies to ship American jobs overseas.”
Among our sins, in the eyes of the DCCC, is that Cato research has supported tariff-reducing trade agreements, such as t...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3197610</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:23:51 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3197610</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Wednesday Links</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3193701&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FayJwHR5nDX4%2F</link>
            <description>By Chris Moody
David Boaz on Obama&amp;#8217;s first year: &amp;#8220;From this libertarian, Obama&amp;#8217;s first year looks grim. &amp;#8230;He may well end up like Lyndon Johnson, with an ambitious domestic agenda eventually bogged down by endless war. But I don&amp;#8217;t think his wished-for FDR model — a transformative agenda that is both popular and long-lasting — is in the cards.&amp;#8221;


The message from Massachusetts: &amp;#8220;There can be no denying that this election was a clear cut rejection of the Democratic health care bills.&amp;#8221;


Attacks from all sides: See what happens when the Right takes on free enterprise. 


A new dictator in Iraq?


Podcast: Daniel Ikenson discusses Obama&amp;#8217;s trade policy. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3193701</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:43:27 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3193701</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brother, Can You Spare A Trillion?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2389664&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F4OyzVrtztoU%2F</link>
            <description>With the economy in a deep recession and policymakers turning to massive government intervention in an attempt to create jobs and bolster the financial system—it feels like the 1930s all over again.  Today’s new New Deal is rapidly unfolding, with the Obama administration and many lawmakers making it clear that any question of the success of FDR’s New Deal policies was resolved long ago: government intervention worked, and history bears repeating.  
However, there are deep disagreements about the New Deal, and whether Roosevelt’s policies deepened the depression and delayed recovery. 
Join us at the Cato Institute on June 1 to be a part of a highly informative half-day conference. Recognized national experts will discuss the economic and legal impact of the New Deal, and how i...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2389664</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:11:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2389664</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NEA Asks President to Nationalize Industries</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2353750&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FReGMHy0HQ98%2F</link>
            <description>The NEA demands that &amp;#8220;a dying laissez faire must be destroyed,&amp;#8221; and calls on the president to nationalize the credit agencies, utilities and major industries (see AP story at right), and we hear hardly a peep from the punditocracy. Strange.
Well, okay, I&amp;#8217;m not actually surprised. This is a real story that actually ran on March 1st&amp;#8230; 1934. I tweaked the image to refer to president Obama rather than FDR.
It&amp;#8217;s taken three quarters of a century, but the NEA&amp;#8217;s plan to nationalize the credit agencies and major industries seems to have finally gotten under way, particularly given the recent assertion of federal control over GM.
One advantage of the delay is that we now have generations of experience with another state-run industry, education, as a guide for what...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2353750</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:45:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2353750</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New on YouTube: Roosevelt v. Reagan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2211759&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FPIJezssGnLc%2F</link>
            <description>Cato Executive Vice President David Boaz debates Heather Boushey, senior economist at the Center for American Progress, over the legacies of Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan.
In light of the current economic crisis, who serves as the better role model for President Obama?

For more videos, subscribe to Cato&amp;#8217;s YouTube channel. (Source: Cato-at-liberty)</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2211759</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:13:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2211759</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Did the New Deal Do?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2141795&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F524805910%2F</link>
            <description>There has been much recent debate about whether or not President Franklin Roosevelt&amp;#8217;s New Deal policies increased the nation&amp;#8217;s economic pain during the Great Depression or led to its end. In today&amp;#8217;s Cato Daily Podcast, Regulation Magazine managing editor Thomas A. Firey reveals why erroneous stories about the effects of the New Deal survive despite decades of economic research that tell a different, more nuanced story:
Listening to the fight today among commentators on the left and the right talking about the New Deal and making various claims about it, as far as a stimulus—they’re almost all wrong, and what’s most disturbing to me as an economic historian is this is actually pretty well-plowed ground, so I don’t know how they can be wrong and how no one’s calli...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2141795</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:12:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2141795</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Did the New Deal ‘Help’?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2108116&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F512422117%2F</link>
            <description>While Barack Obama&amp;#8217;s economics team hammers out its $800 billion fiscal stimulus plan, the commentariat is battling over the effectiveness of what some consider the prototype stimulus package, the New Deal.* The suppressed (and problematic) conclusion to all this punditry seems to be: Because government spending under the New Deal helped/didn&amp;#8217;t help to end the Great Depression, the Obama stimulus plan will/won&amp;#8217;t help to end the current recession.
One of the opening salvos was this exchange between George Will (anti-New Deal) and Paul Krugman (pro). More recently, New York Times editorial board member Adam Cohen (pro) wrote this column, responding to an op-ed by former Business Week bureau chief Andrew Wilson (anti) in The Wall Street Journal.
So who&amp;#8217;s right? Did...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2108116</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:09:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2108116</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What Is It Good For?  Centralizing Power.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2108117&amp;cid=t_195475_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F512184370%2F</link>
            <description>The Politico reports that Vice President-elect Joe Biden has been comparing our current economic troubles to the 9/11 attacks.
&amp;#8220;We’re at war,” Biden told congressional leaders of both parties during their sit-down with Barack Obama in the Capitol, according to two sources familiar with the exchange.
Libertarians and conservatives who fear that Obama&amp;#8217;s inauguration heralds the coming of a new New Deal have new cause for discomfort, then.  FDR&amp;#8217;s embrace of the war metaphor was central to building support for the New Deal:
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, elected in a landslide in 1932, wasn’t the only political figure to analogize America’s economic collapse to an attack by a hostile power; his predecessor Hoover had made the comparison regularly. F.D.R. employed the war...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2108117</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:10:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2108117</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lessons from FDR for a life of chronic pain</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1671896&amp;cid=t_195475_129_f&amp;fid=36035&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.healthtalk.com%2Fchronic-pain%2Flife-with-chronic-pain%2Flessons-from-fdr-for-a-life-of-chronic-pain%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;ve been recovering from various medical testing and been a bit lazier than usual. Today I spent the afternoon resting my body and watching a PBS production called &amp;#8220;FDR: A Presidency Revealed.&amp;#8221; I taped it some time ago but forgot about it. Sometimes, I truly believe books, people, movies and TV come into our lives when we need them. Today, FDR helped me out. Not bad for a dead President. I did appreciate it.
In the current political climate, we hear that word &amp;#8220;change&amp;#8221; almost everyday. Everyone thinks it&amp;#8217;s the answer for the future. It sounds so simple, doesn&amp;#8217;t it? Just go out and change, just like that. Change the world, change the war, change our enemies and then insert miraculous new leadership. How naïve we can be, at times. Those of us whose ...</description>
            <author>Life with Chronic Pain</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1671896</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:04:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1671896</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

