<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: federated search</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'federated search'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22federated+search%22&t=%22federated+search%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:37:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>ScienceRoll Medical Search : new federated search tool</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2160253&amp;cid=t_118280_86_f&amp;fid=34461&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigicmb.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F02%2Fscienceroll-medical-search-new.html</link>
            <description>ScienceRoll Medical Search is a new federated search tool created by Bertelan (Berci) Meskó together with PolyMeta.
Scienceroll Medical Search is a personalized medical metasearch engine. You can choose the databases you want to search in and exclude any of them to make your search as individualized as possible. ...The aim is to create a useful, editable metasearch engine for the entire medical community.And it does what is said:there are 4 major search categories (Basic Health Information, Drugs, Organizations and Research Information) with all together 23 &quot;databases&quot; which can be selected by choice.it delivers fast results (within 10 second) presented in manageable merged first setwith an &quot; Also Consider&quot; advicea clustered overview of Topics, Date and Formatin a relevance ranked orderI ...</description>
            <author>DigiCMB</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2160253</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:49:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2160253</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mednar the Health Search Solution</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2076960&amp;cid=t_118280_88_f&amp;fid=38129&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fsandnsurf.medbrains.net%2F2008%2F12%2Fmednar-the-health-search-solution%2F</link>
            <description>Mednar is a one-stop federated search engine designed for professional medical researchers to quickly access information from a multitude of credible sources. Researchers can take advantage of Mednar&amp;#8217;s many tools to narrow their searches, drill down into topics and discover new information sources.
Mednar  is here and it is good. Check it out medical librarians, public library staff, [...] (Source: Life in the Fast Lane)</description>
            <author>Life in the Fast Lane</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2076960</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:38:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2076960</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>more on federated search</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=698182&amp;cid=t_118280_86_f&amp;fid=35595&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftunaiskewl.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F06%2F26%2Fmore-on-federated-search%2F</link>
            <description>librarian.net and The Chronicle both covered the Thomas Mann piece I wrote about yesterday today.  The Chronicle coverage is interesting primarily because of its comments.
Here&amp;#8217;s the one I mean:
&amp;#8220;My experience with librarians, at least in scientific university libraries (I’m a scientist) is that they are basically incapable of anything beyond using the keywords in their database.
The reason is that they have absolutely no idea about what they are cataloguing.
If I walk to a librarian and I say “I’d like a book discussing the various definitions of computable reals”, I’m sure she’ll pull a face and input “computable reals” in her database. If the books were not tagged in this precise way, she’ll find nothing.
I’m unsure how humanities libraries are staffed, ...</description>
            <author>omg tuna is kewl</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=698182</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:44:22 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">698182</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>federated searching in medicine</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=695380&amp;cid=t_118280_86_f&amp;fid=35595&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftunaiskewl.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F06%2F25%2Ffederated-searching-in-medicine%2F</link>
            <description>I finished up the Harry Potter books on Saturday, just in time for tomorrow&amp;#8217;s release of Order of the Phoenix on Playstation, so I can finally take a minute to stop neglecting this blog.
Federated search has been on my mind again recently, due to a number of factors.  One, at work, federated search came up again as something we should look into.  Two, I met with a rep of a federated search product.  Three, the excellent report/article by Thomas Mann called, &amp;#8220;The Peloponnesian War and the Future of Reference, Cataloging, and Scholarship in Research Libraries&amp;#8221; (PDF), came to my attention today via David Weinberger&amp;#8217;s blog.
I don&amp;#8217;t think I&amp;#8217;ve been entirely secretive about my dislike for federated searching, but reading Mann&amp;#8217;s report pretty much seal...</description>
            <author>omg tuna is kewl</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=695380</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:31:14 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">695380</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Scitopia</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=604530&amp;cid=t_118280_132_f&amp;fid=35011&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2F%7Er%2Fmndoci%2F%7E3%2F116075319%2F</link>
            <description>Somewhere in my feed reader (apologies for not remembering the source), there was a press release announcing Scitopia, a collaboration between a number of publishers to use a federated search engine to find articles as they are released. Due for release this summer, there was actually quite a lot of press around Scitopia. The search technology of choice has been developed by Deep Web Technologies, which specializes in federated search. The service is free and is being positioned as a better search for scientific content, i.e. one with a superior signal-to-noise ratio than Google or other search engines. The deep web engine will search both journal content, as well as conference proceedings.
Without seeing it in action, there is not much to say, other than hope that Scitopia will not forget...</description>
            <author>business|bytes|genes|molecules</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=604530</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 06:27:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">604530</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

