<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: fedex</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'fedex'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22fedex%22&t=%22fedex%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:55:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Congress Is Hurdle to USPS Reforms</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3440774&amp;cid=t_304942_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FK0PDJ3rn0jQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenNational Journal reports that two key policymakers don’t support the U.S. Postal Service’s desire to eliminate Saturday mail delivery. House Financial Services Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Jose Serrano (D-NY) says he’ll be working with USPS management and the postal unions to avoid service cuts. And House Oversight and Government Reform Federal Workforce Subcommittee ranking member Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) announced that he too opposes the move.
Chaffetz intends to introduce legislation that would instead eliminate twelve delivery days a year. Twelve days? With the USPS facing $238 billion in losses over the next ten years, it’s hard to understand why the Republican congressman is fiddling around with such small changes.
From the article:
Chaffetz said he is conc...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3440774</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3440774</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Friday Foolery #14: Pronouncing Hoechst</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3056586&amp;cid=t_304942_86_f&amp;fid=38272&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flaikaspoetnik.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F12%2F04%2Ffriday-foolery-14-pronouncing-hoechst%2F</link>
            <description>Ever had that? You &amp;#8216;re giving a scientific lecture and you mispronounce one or a few words. Sometimes you know a word is hard to pronounce, but, knowing that, it even gets harder to pronounce the word correctly. For instance, I find it hard to pronounce certain gynecological and dermatological diseases.
Sometimes you don&amp;#8217;t know that [...] (Source: Laika's MedLibLog)</description>
            <author>Laika's MedLibLog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3056586</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:20:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3056586</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sacrifice for Brand Success</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3023190&amp;cid=t_304942_109_f&amp;fid=34761&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedblitz.com%2F%7E%2F2099025%2Furuf9%2Fneuromarketing%7ESacrifice-for-Brand-Success.htm</link>
            <description>In developing a brand, it&amp;#8217;s tempting to appeal to as many people as possible. We all want to be liked, and all too often organizations tread lightly with their branding message to avoid impairing their appeal to specific groups of customers. Or, to increase sales, a company tries extending a successful brand to [...]
      CommentsBy: Jeff Ramos by Jeff RamosBy: Jonas by Jonas (Source: Neuromarketing)</description>
            <author>Neuromarketing</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3023190</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:07:55 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3023190</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

