<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: fiscal year</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'fiscal year'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22fiscal+year%22&t=%22fiscal+year%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:59:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Is Keynesian Stimulus Working?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3075478&amp;cid=t_152215_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FJgUE4NKrvDg%2F</link>
            <description>By Chris EdwardsIn his Brookings Institution speech yesterday, President Obama called for more Keynesian-style spending stimulus for the economy, including increased investment on government projects and expanded subsidy payments to the unemployed and state governments. The package might cost $150 billion or more.
The president said that we&amp;#8217;ve had to &amp;#8220;spend our way out of this recession.&amp;#8221; We&amp;#8217;ve certainly had massive spending, but it doesn&amp;#8217;t seemed to have helped the economy, as the 10 percent unemployment rate attests to.
It&amp;#8217;s not just that the Obama &amp;#8220;stimulus&amp;#8221; package from February has apparently failed. The total Keynesian stimulus is not measured by the spending in that bill only, but by the total size of federal government defici...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3075478</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:43:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3075478</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Texas Punishes 268 Abusive Employees</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2473569&amp;cid=t_152215_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F06%2F13%2Ftexas-punishes-268-abusive-employees%2F</link>
            <description>In April, we noted how 11 Texas employees were let go for their behavior in supervising mentally and developmentally disabled people in a state school. Well, the other shoe has dropped, and it&amp;#8217;s a doozy:

Nearly 270 employees were fired or suspended for abusing or neglecting residents of large, state-run institutions for the mentally disabled in Texas during the last fiscal year, according to records obtained by The Associated Press.
The revelations Friday come a day after Gov. Rick Perry signed legislation aimed at improving security and oversight at the 13 institutions, known as state schools. They are home to about 4,600 residents and more than 12,000 full-time employees.
Documents obtained by the AP through an open records request show that 11 of the 268 firings or suspensions we...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2473569</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:00:58 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2473569</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Taxpayers Deserve Better from the President</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2398595&amp;cid=t_152215_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FdosPwWxBMmk%2F</link>
            <description>President Obama’s estimated $17 billion budget cuts for fiscal year 2010 amounts to a measly .5 percent of the president’s total proposed spending, and 1.5 percent of the president’s proposed deficit for the coming fiscal year. His offerings to cut the budget should be dismissed as unserious. In fact, this is reminiscent of the Bush administration’s annual list of minuscule proposed cuts in the face of profligate spending and mounting federal debt.
President Obama says his efforts “are just the next phase of a larger and longer effort needed to change how Washington does business and put our fiscal house in order.” Promising more spending and more debt while celebrating relatively insignificant cuts and ignoring the looming entitlement crunch represents businesses as usual, not...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2398595</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:09:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2398595</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Congressional Priorities and the FY2010 Budget Resolution</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2380725&amp;cid=t_152215_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FKYjFx7RRtMI%2F</link>
            <description>Yesterday the House and Senate passed a bloated $3.5 trillion budget blueprint for fiscal year 2010.  According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), &amp;#8220;What is important to us as a nation is reflected in this budget. It&amp;#8217;s a very happy day for our country.&amp;#8221;
Included in the blueprint is language that calls for an equal pay raise between military employees and civilian federal employees.  President Obama had originally proposed slightly higher pay for members of the armed services.  The exact pay raise for bureaucrats will be determined in the appropriations process, but it&amp;#8217;s likely to be a hike of anywhere from 2.9% to 3.9%.  This would come on top of last year&amp;#8217;s 3.9% raise.
Omitted from the blueprint was language included in the Senate version by Sen. Tom Co...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2380725</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:17:53 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2380725</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ICD Recall For Medtronic Yet Again</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=954244&amp;cid=t_152215_111_f&amp;fid=36048&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.b5media.com%2F%7Er%2Fb5media%2FAHeartyLife%2F%7E3%2F170413511%2F</link>
            <description>Medtronic disclosed the latest issue early Monday, saying that it decided to pull the &amp;#8220;Sprint Fidelis&amp;#8221; brand of leads for defibrillators, or ICDs, because they are prone to fracturing and potentially causing major problems. The issue may have contributed to five deaths, Medtronic said.
Here we go again. This can&amp;#8217;t be good given the already dark shadow that was cast upon ICD&amp;#8217;s in the major recall that occurred in 2005. And because of limited supplies Medtronic won&amp;#8217;t be able to re-supply patients until later in the fiscal year. I think it is safe to say that there will be an enormous monetary implication due to this.
If you have concerns, put a call into your doctor and they will put a call into consultants for Medtronic. Remember that with this recall, the wire...</description>
            <author>A Hearty Life</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=954244</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:12:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">954244</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

