<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: fort hood</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'fort hood'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22fort+hood%22&t=%22fort+hood%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:41:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Nidal Hasan Exactly the Man Many Knew Him to Be</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4433135&amp;cid=t_307821_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2011%2F02%2F03%2Fnidal-hasan-exactly-the-man-many-knew-him-to-be%2F</link>
            <description>Army Maj. Nidal Hasan was exactly the kind of man many people knew him to be. And that&amp;#8217;s why they continually promoted him and sent him some place else. Because nobody, apparently, was willing to intervene despite many warning signs about his behavior.
Those are the findings from the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. They found that the massacre allegedly carried out by Nidal Hasan could have have been prevented.
Had just one person acted on the information many different people had, the tragedy that occurred at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009 may have been prevented.

&amp;#8220;The officers who kept Hasan in the military and moved him steadily along knew full well of his problematic behavior,&amp;#8221; the report found. &amp;#8220;As the officer who assigned Has...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4433135</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:00:13 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4433135</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>‘The Dumbest Terrorist In the World’?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3538078&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FBab5R3VnWa4%2F</link>
            <description>By Benjamin H. FriedmanBusinessweek has a story quoting a former federal prosecutor in Brooklyn, Michael Wildes, speculating that Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square bomber, made so many mistakes (leaving his house keys in the car, not knowing about the vehicle identification number, making calls from his cellphone, getting filmed, buying the car himself) that he may be the &amp;#8220;dumbest terrorist in the world.&amp;#8221; But Wildes can&amp;#8217;t accept the idea that an al Qaeda type terrorist would be so incompetent and suggests that Shahzad was &amp;#8220;purposefully hapless&amp;#8221; to generate intelligence about the police reaction for the edification of his buddies back in Pakistan.
Give me a break. This incompetence is hardly unprecedented. Three years ago Bruce Schneier wrote an art...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3538078</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 18:14:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3538078</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Reactions to al Qaeda Terrorism Have Opened a Flank</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3411094&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FnHXpN68eSsE%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperExcellent recent posts by my colleague David Rittgers have covered the legal (and practical) issues involved in terrorist detention. Take a look at &amp;#8220;The Case against Domestic Military Detention&amp;#8221; and his follow-up, &amp;#8220;Playing Chicken Again.&amp;#8221; He has also lectured on the Hill about terrorism strategy, relating themes I used to open our 2009 and 2010 counterterrorism conferences.
The gist is that terrorism seeks overreaction on the part of the victim state. Lacking power of their own, terrorists try to goad states into overzealous and misdirected responses that serve their aims.
A prominent aim among members of the al-Qaeda franchise is mobilization of others, one of five strategies that U.S. National War College professor of strategy Audrey Kurth Cronin la...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3411094</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:05:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3411094</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to Prevent a Fort Hood Shooting</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3374111&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FI_SOJfqUdrQ%2F</link>
            <description>By Jim HarperI wrote some posts a few months ago (1, 2, 3) about the difficulty of discovering and preventing essentially random events like the Fort Hood shooting. I was pleased by the compliment security guru Bruce Schneier paid them in his recent post, &amp;#8220;Small Planes and Lone Terrorist Nutcases.&amp;#8221; (Such happy subject matter we get to write about!)
Now comes Radley Balko with a great column illustrating what you get when authorities try to &amp;#8220;get ahead&amp;#8221; of this problem. &amp;#8220;Pre-Crime Policing&amp;#8221; tells the story of a gun buyer who had been tagged with the adjective &amp;#8220;disgruntled.&amp;#8221; A SWAT team appeared on his property, police tricked him into surrendering for a mental evaluation, they illegally entered his home, and they seized his guns.
Says the ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3374111</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:53:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3374111</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Holder on the Hot Seat</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3239548&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FGm8h5rMVYhE%2F</link>
            <description>By Roger PilonToday Politico Arena asks:
Terror suspects: Eric Holder&amp;#8217;s defense (nothing new here)&amp;#8211;agree or disagree?
My response:
There&amp;#8217;s no question that after the killings in Little Rock and Fort Hood, the decision to try the KSM five in a civilian court in downtown Manhattan, and the Christmas Day bombing attempt (the government&amp;#8217;s before and after behavior alike), the Obama-Holder &amp;#8220;law-enforcement&amp;#8221; approach to terrorism is under serious bipartisan scrutiny.  And Holder&amp;#8217;s letter yesterday to his critics on the Hill isn&amp;#8217;t likely to assuage them, not least because it essentially ignores issues brought out in the January 20 hearings before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security, like the government&amp;#8217;s failure to have its promise...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3239548</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:38:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3239548</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Report on Fort Hood, Hasan</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3178814&amp;cid=t_307821_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2010%2F01%2F15%2Freport-on-fort-hood-hasan%2F</link>
            <description>The AP reported this morning that the Army report to be released today will implicate Army Maj. Nidal Hasan&amp;#8217;s supervisors and those who knew of his troubled behavior, but failed to detail it in his records or further followup on it. 
Hasan&amp;#8217;s disturbing behaviors were detailed as far back as during his medical residency and were apparently known to anyone who worked closely with him in a supervisory capacity. And when they became aware of his behavior, did they detail it and pass it along to Hasan&amp;#8217;s future bosses? Apparently not:

Hasan got passing grades and a promotion in part because disturbing information about his behavior and performance was not recorded by superiors or properly passed to others who might have stepped in, the report found.
As Hasan&amp;#8217;s training p...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3178814</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:45:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3178814</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fort Hood: That No Such Attack Ever Occurs Again</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3003730&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Fo_wl0uhJLxg%2F</link>
            <description>Colleagues and correspondents have kindly shared their understandable discomfort with my conclusion in recent posts that the Fort Hood shooting was nearly impossible to discover in advance, and thus prevent.
The one ray of hope I can offer is that the shooting itself makes such things more foreseeable, putting the military community and investigators on notice prospectively that this kind of thing can happen. No formal policy change can do more than the Fort Hood shooting itself to ferret out inchoate incidents like it in the future. Belief that the Fort Hood shooting was easily preventable, though, is 20/20 hindsight.
I first read How We Know What Just Isn&amp;#8217;t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life to get a handle on how it became so plausible after the September 11, ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3003730</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:34:03 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3003730</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tuesday Links</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3003734&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FKCglQpiCXZE%2F</link>
            <description>In the past eight months, the unemployment rate has jumped from 7.2 percent to 10.2 percent. Here&amp;#8217;s why. 


Three trillion reasons to hope the Senate is not as fiscally reckless as their counterparts in the House on health care reform. 


 Obama a federalist? Not quite: &amp;#8220;Not yet a year into his administration, Obama&amp;#8217;s record on 10th Amendment issues is already clear: He&amp;#8217;ll let the states have their way when their policies please blue team sensibilities and he&amp;#8217;ll call in the feds when they don&amp;#8217;t.&amp;#8221; More here. 


It&amp;#8217;s time to get immigration reform right: &amp;#8220;Republican leaders need to liberate themselves from the Lou Dobbs minority within their own ranks that will oppose any legalization. Democratic leaders need to face down their labor-unio...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3003734</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:49:21 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3003734</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Listen to Your Doctor, Uncle Sam</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2999621&amp;cid=t_307821_111_f&amp;fid=34716&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FNurseRatchedsPlace%2F%7E3%2FPIx1l-NSA2Y%2F</link>
            <description>Dear Uncle Sam:
I know it&amp;#8217;s been a rough week. I&amp;#8217;m sure you&amp;#8217;re grieving the lost of life at Fort Hood just like the rest of us, but I&amp;#8217;m compelled to write you this letter. I hope you take it in the spirit in which it is meant. 
I read an article at Salon.com today that made me wonder about your judgement. Since when did you stop listening to your doctors? The article was about Dr. Kernan Manion, a psychiatrist who wanted to help troops before they went postal on military bases. Uncle Sam, Dr. Manion use to work for you at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Then he got fired. Why did you give Dr. Manion the boot for stating the obvious? He pointed out that troops at Camp Lejeune are getting bullied by superiors and dumped into an overwhelmed mental health care system when...</description>
            <author>Nurse Ratched's Place</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2999621</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:10:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2999621</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Shockumentary: A Horror Genre for Our Times</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2995995&amp;cid=t_307821_136_f&amp;fid=37852&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdonnatrussell.com%2F2009%2F11%2F16%2Fshockumentary-a-horror-genre-for-our-times%2F</link>
            <description>Jennifer Carpenter in 2008 film Quarantine
My new post on Politics Daily / Woman Up:
They say we know who we are by the myths we cherish.
I&amp;#8217;d planned to weigh in on the third-season finale of &amp;#8220;Mad Men,&amp;#8221; a show that is both a valentine to and a critique of the 1960s. But I got sidetracked by another kind of myth – a tale of horror.
Last night I watched the 2008 film &amp;#8220;Quarantine.&amp;#8221; Whether filmmakers intend it or not, all horror movies tap into the anxieties of their times. With &amp;#8220;Quarantine,&amp;#8221; it&amp;#8217;s the war we&amp;#8217;re now fighting.
Japan&amp;#8217;s 1954 &amp;#8220;Godzilla&amp;#8221; put the trauma of the atomic age on display for all the world to see. The 1956 film &amp;#8220;Invasion of the Body Snatchers&amp;#8221; reflected the fear of communism taking over o...</description>
            <author>Donna Trussell</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2995995</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:44:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2995995</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fort Hood: Reaction, Response, and Rejoinder</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2984777&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FODpp6kuKYzg%2F</link>
            <description>Commentary on the Fort Hood incident can be categorized three ways: reaction, response, and rejoinder (commentary on the commentary).
Reactions generally consist of pundits pouring their preconceptions over what is known of the facts. These are the least worthy of our time, and rejoinders like this one from Stephen M. Walt of Harvard University in the Fort Hood section of The Politico&amp;#8217;s Arena blog dispense with them well:
Of course [Fort Hood] is being politicized; there is no issue that is immune to exploitation by politicians and media commentators. The problem is that there are an infinite number of &amp;#8220;lessons&amp;#8221; one can draw from a tragic event like this &amp;#8212; the strain on our troops from a foolish war, the impact of hateful ideas from the fringe of a great religion...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2984777</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:39:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2984777</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fort Hood and Political Correctness</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2984784&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FMTmkItfLiyM%2F</link>
            <description>This morning, Politico Arena asks:
The Fort Hood tragedy: Why does it matter, or not, what we call it? Is it being politicized?
My response:
If we want to be technical, what we call the Fort Hood massacre matters, and James Taranto got it right in Monday&amp;#8217;s Wall Street Journal:  It was not a terrorist attack, targeting noncombatants, but an act of guerrilla warfare, carried out by one of our own in apparent contact with the enemy, and hence an act of treason.
But the deeper and far larger problem is why the Army didn&amp;#8217;t act sooner against this man and, even more, why it is, as Dorothy Rabinowitz put it in yesterday&amp;#8217;s Journal, that &amp;#8220;the tide of pronouncements and ruminations pointing to every cause for this event other than the one obvious to everyone in the rationa...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2984784</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:23:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2984784</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Search for Answers in Fort Hood</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2977263&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FMKdMzR_2CCI%2F</link>
            <description>The country is unpacking the recent shooting at Fort Hood and analyzing the perpetrator intensely. Along with natural shock and curiosity, a principle reason for doing so is to discover what can prevent incidents like this in the future.
When faced with any risk, including rampaging gunmen, there are four options:

Prevention&amp;#8212;the alteration of the target or its circumstances to diminish the risk of the bad thing happening.
Interdiction&amp;#8212;any confrontation with, or influence exerted on, an attacker to eliminate or limit its movement toward causing harm.
Mitigation&amp;#8212;preparation so that, in the event of the bad thing happening, its consequences are reduced.
Acceptance&amp;#8212;a rational alternative often chosen when the threat has low probability, low consequence, or both.

(Ther...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2977263</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:51:16 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2977263</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Preemptive Word on “Lone Wolves”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2977272&amp;cid=t_307821_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2Frhu-1uSAIRs%2F</link>
            <description>As Marcy Wheeler notes, the press seem to have settled on the term &amp;#8220;lone wolf&amp;#8221; to describe Fort Hood gunman Nidal Malik Hasan, which means it&amp;#8217;s probably only a matter of time before we encounter a pundit or legislator who is cynical or befuddled enough (or both) to invoke the tragedy in defense of the PATRIOT Act&amp;#8217;s constitutionally dubious Lone Wolf provision. (A &amp;#8220;matter of time&amp;#8221; apparently meaning the time it took me to write that sentence: We have a winner!) Though the Senate Judiciary Committee has approved a bill that would renew the measure, their counterparts in the House wisely—though narrowly—voted to permit it to expire last week.
To spare anyone tempted by this argument some embarrassment: The Lone Wolf provision is totally irrelevant to th...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2977272</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:37:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2977272</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Best of Our Blogs: November 6, 2009</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2967340&amp;cid=t_307821_109_f&amp;fid=34750&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpsychcentral.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2009%2F11%2F06%2Fbest-of-our-blogs-november-6-2009%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;m attending the 25th Annual Rosalynn Carter Symposium on Mental Health Policy today, and I&amp;#8217;ll write more about the inspirational work this organization has been doing for 25 years shortly (not just in Georgia, but throughout the entire country). The people who are attending this symposium &amp;#8212; as well as the Carter Center itself &amp;#8212; have done much to improve mental health care in the U.S., but it&amp;#8217;s not something you hear enough about. It&amp;#8217;s heartening so many great minds coming together to share best practices and ideas for improvement (especially at this unique time in healthcare history). Not just policy wonks, but also physicians, mental health practitioners, administrators, consumers, CEOs, you name it &amp;#8212; they&amp;#8217;re all here. All talking about wa...</description>
            <author>World of Psychology</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2967340</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:06:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2967340</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

