<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: fossil fuels</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'fossil fuels'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22fossil+fuels%22&t=%22fossil+fuels%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:31:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>USGS Slashes Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Reserve Estimate</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5158890&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F008254.html</link>
            <description>The US Geological Survey has cut its estimate of technically recoverable natural gas from the big Marcellus Shale by about 79.5%. You just got more energy poor. Get a more insulated water heater next time you need a new one. The shale formation has about 84 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered, technically recoverable natural gas, according to the report from the United States Geological Survey. This is drastically lower than the 410 trillion cubic feet that was published earlier this year by the federal Energy Information Administration. These are technically recoverable estimates. Economically recoverable reserves will be some amount less than these numbers and to get anywhere near the full technically recoverable number above might require substantially higher costs. How... (Source: Futu...</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5158890</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5158890</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NYT And EIA: Shale Gas Bubble?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4975800&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F008157.html</link>
            <description>The New York Times has gotten hold of internal documents of the US Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration where several EIA officials are found voicing their skepticism about the long term prospects for extracting large amounts of natural gas from fracturing shale rock. The term &quot;irrational exuberance&quot; gets used. In scores of internal e-mails and documents, officials within the Energy Information Administration, or E.I.A., voice skepticism about the shale gas industry. One official says the shale industry may be &amp;nbsp;set up for failure. It is quite likely that many of these companies will go bankrupt, a senior adviser to the Energy Information Administration administrator predicts. Several officials echo concerns raised during previous bubbles, in housing and in ...</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4975800</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4975800</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Most Expensive Offshore Ship For LNG Production</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4911427&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F008123.html</link>
            <description>A post by Big Gav at The Oil Drum reports on a decision by Shell to spend $12.6 billion to build a ship that will float above an Australian offshore natural gas field and liquify natural gas for shipment. The field is too far from the coast to have pipelines built to bring the natural gas onshore. My take: This ship illustrates the massive amounts of capital and engineering talent available to extract fossil fuels (about $490 billion total capital spending by oil companies in 2011). Offshore floating LNG production ships seem to be unrivaled in costs for a single energy extraction device. Even a nuclear power plant won't cost that much (caveat: nuclear power cost estimates cover a wide... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4911427</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4911427</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Shell Sees Intensified Economic Cycles Due To Oil</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4482725&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007909.html</link>
            <description>A new energy report from Shell sees increased economic volatility due to high oil costs and rising demand. (thanks Lou Pagnucco) We believe that the world is entering an era of volatile transitions and intensified economic cycles. The recession interrupted the oil and commodity price boom but it may return. Emerging nations like China and India are going through materially intensive development and a tighter market will continue to put pressure on prices and generate volatility. Improvements in policy-making and strong gains in productivity have helped economies to grow without inflation in the last two decades. We do not believe the moderating effect of this combination of good policies, good practices, and good luck will continue into the future. Supply... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4482725</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4482725</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Wikileaks: Saudi Arabia Oil Reserves Much Lower</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4455236&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007890.html</link>
            <description>The US government secretly takes seriously former Saudi Aramco exploration chief Sadad al-Husseini's belief that Saudi Arabia has far less oil than its official claimed reserves. Saudi Arabia's oil production might already be past peak. The US fears that Saudi Arabia, the world's largest crude oil exporter, may not have enough reserves to prevent oil prices escalating, confidential cables from its embassy in Riyadh show. The cables, released by WikiLeaks, urge Washington to take seriously a warning from a senior Saudi government oil executive that the kingdom's crude oil reserves may have been overstated by as much as 300bn barrels  nearly 40%. The cable even betrays a thorough understanding of why peak oil exports precedes peak oil production. The... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4455236</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4455236</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sen. Rand Paul Proposes Serious Cuts</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4419112&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F8PbpRgs3Pk8%2F</link>
            <description>By Tad DeHavenFreshman Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has raised the bar in Washington by releasing a bill that would make substantial, specific, and immediate cuts in federal spending. While policymakers on both sides of the aisle have largely paid lip service to stopping Washington’s record run of fiscal profligacy, Paul’s proposal makes good on his campaign promise to seriously tackle the federal government’s bloated budget.
Paul’s bill would target $500 billion in cuts for fiscal 2011 alone. While audacious by Washington standards, cutting federal spending by that amount would still leave us with a projected $1 trillion deficit this year. Nonetheless, the federal government’s scope would be dramatically curtailed, which would pay dividends in coming years as the economy is unshackled ...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4419112</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:49:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4419112</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Chinese Government Worries On Domestic Peak Coal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4175657&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007652.html</link>
            <description>The Wall Street Journal reports that the Chinese government might place a limit on coal mining in order to make Chinese domestic coal reserves last longer. State-run media reported that Beijing is considering capping domestic coal output in the 2011-2015 period, partly because officials worry miners are running down reserves too quickly to meet the needs of a rapidly expanding economy. &quot;China accounts for around 14% of global coal reserves but its share of global coal consumption is already over triple that at 47%, which is unsustainable,&quot; Hong Kong-based brokerage CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets said in a report last month. Their main worry on coal consumption is not global warming. They want their reserves to last longer and would rather import... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4175657</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4175657</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>J.R. Ewing Is Back: Selling Green Energy, Not Oil</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3753782&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fj-r-ewing-is-back-selling-green-energy-not-oil%2F</link>
            <description>If you were a fan of Dallas back in the day (and who wasn&amp;#8217;t?), you know that J.R. Ewing as a big-wig oil tycoon who only associated the color green with money – and got shot. But now, J.R.&amp;#8217;s back, singing the praises of green living through solar energy in a commercial for SolarWorld. Check out the commercial here, and an interview with Larry Hagman (the man behind J.R.), at his real-life solar powered mansion, below.
Perhaps next, Homer Simpson will convince Mr. Burns to convert the nuclear power plant into a wind farm.


via The New York Times
Post from: BlissTree
J.R. Ewing Is Back: Selling Green Energy, Not Oil (Source: Breastfeeding 1-2-3)</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3753782</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:34:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3753782</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>BP-ify Your Computer Screen: Instant Oil Spill</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3746711&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Fbp-ify-your-computer-screen-instant-oil-spill%2F</link>
            <description>If you need something to occupy yourself today while BP is trying to put a new cap on the leaking oil well in the Gulf, we&amp;#8217;ve got just the thing. It&amp;#8217;s called Instant Oil Spill, and it&amp;#8217;s an interactive site that brings the murky toxins of the oil spill right to your computer screen.
The site is brought to you by A Cleaner Future, a nonprofit that focuses on creating awareness about alternative and cleaner energy sources. We thought that adding a little oil spill to the BP website would be cathartic, and, while it was sort of fun in an ironic way to see the black goop fill their homepage, it just wasn&amp;#8217;t all that satisfying.
via The Huffington Post
Post from: BlissTree
BP-ify Your Computer Screen: Instant Oil Spill (Source: Breastfeeding 1-2-3)</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3746711</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:19:31 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3746711</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>America's Energy Sacrifices: A Cartoon That Makes Us Sad</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3718366&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36050&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Flive%2Famericas-energy-sacrifices-a-cartoon-that-makes-us-sad%2F</link>
            <description>There&amp;#8217;s really not much else we can add – this cartoon says it all. If only we could just laugh off this comic strip.

via Reddit
Post from: BlissTree
America's Energy Sacrifices: A Cartoon That Makes Us Sad (Source: Breastfeeding 1-2-3)</description>
            <author>Breastfeeding 1-2-3</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3718366</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 22:00:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3718366</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Gulf Oil Spill Makes Alberta Tar Sands Look Good</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3635710&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007229.html</link>
            <description>What does Peak Oil look like? The world's so desperate for oil that a big oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico makes the oil in the Alberta tar sands look like an environmentally superior choice. &quot;In North America there are really only two places where you can see meaningful supply growth, one being in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, and the other being the oil sands,&quot; said Mark Frieson, an energy analyst with Versant Partners Inc. in Calgary. &quot;We know what's happening with [the Gulf], and I think that has some potential positive implications for the oil-sands industry here in Alberta. For example, BP is going to develop an Alberta oil sands (really tar sands) project that has 10... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3635710</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3635710</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Oil Industry Veterans On Peak Oil</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3567882&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007179.html</link>
            <description>Wondering about what sorts of people think Peak Oil is a real problem? Watch this video. Then watch this video. Check out more videos at aspo.tv (Association for the Study of Peak Oil &amp; Gas). Also, listen to this interview with retired petroleum geologist Colin Campbell. Also, read former ConocoPhillips engineer Robert Rapier on the latest US Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook for 2010. The EIA took away the scary unidentified projects graph from last year. People in the International Energy Agency want to tell you about Peak Oil but the Obama Administration silenced them.... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3567882</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3567882</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Bright Future For Natural Gas From Shale Rock?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3552198&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007162.html</link>
            <description>Wiriting in the Wall Street Journal Amy Myers Jaffe of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University says technological advances that ease the extract of the huge quantities of natural gas in shale rock are a game changer that will make natural gas cheap and plentiful for decades to come. Over the past decade, a wave of drilling around the world has uncovered giant supplies of natural gas in shale rock. By some estimates, there's 1,000 trillion cubic feet recoverable in North America aloneenough to supply the nation's natural-gas needs for the next 45 years. Europe may have nearly 200 trillion cubic feet of its own. We've always known the potential of shale; we just... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3552198</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3552198</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why the Neo-Malthusian Worldview Fails the Reality Check</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3519440&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FpTnhFrfoYjA%2F</link>
            <description>By Indur GoklanyWhy does the Neo-Malthusians’ dystopian worldview — that human and environmental well-being will suffer with increases in population, affluence and technological change — fail the reality check? Why has human well-being improved in the Age of Industrialization despite order-of-magnitude increases in the consumption of materials, fossil fuel energy and chemicals?
I offer some reasons in the last of a series of posts (1, 2, 3, 4) at MasterResource.
I note that although population, affluence and technology can create some problems for humanity and the planet, they are also the agents for solving those problems. In particular, human capital and greater affluence have helped the development and adoption of new and improved technologies, which empirical data show have redu...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3519440</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:19:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3519440</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Poll of the Day: Should Our Country Quit Coal?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3460130&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblisstree.com%2Ffeel%2Fpoll-of-the-day-should-our-country-quit-coal%2F</link>
            <description>Last week in Montcoal, West Virginia, an explosion inside a Massey Energy Company coal mine killed 29 men. Just four short years ago, 12 miners died inside West Virginia&amp;#8217;s Sago coal mine. Nationwide, the powerful coal mining industry provides consistent jobs to many people in low-income areas. But at what cost? Just a few dozen human lives every couple of years. Should the U.S. continue its dependency on this dirty fossil fuel, even if it means risking the lives of many of its workers on a daily basis? Or should our nation phase out coal mining in favor of cleaner and safer alternative methods of energy production that could potentially spare the environment – not to mention lives? Take our poll below.
#MicroPollDiv_247083 { width: 250px; margin: 0px auto; }


via The New York Time...</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3460130</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:52:54 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3460130</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Atomic Dreams</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3448841&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FcXWA7doTgeo%2F</link>
            <description>By Jerry TaylorLast week I was on John Stossel’s (most excellent) new show on Fox Business News to discuss energy policy &amp;#8212; in particular, popular myths that Republicans have about energy markets.  One of the topics I touched upon was nuclear power.  My argument was the same that I have offered in print: Nuclear power is a swell technology but, given the high construction costs associated with building nuclear reactors, it’s a technology that cannot compete in free markets without a massive amount of government support.  If one believes in free markets, then one should look askance at such policies. 
As expected, the atomic cult has taken offense. 
Now, it is reasonable to argue that excessive regulatory oversight has driven up the cost of nuclear power and that a “better...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3448841</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:36:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3448841</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Outer Continental Shelf Oil Drilling Potential</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3366166&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007017.html</link>
            <description>Gail the Actuary points to an interesting claim about deep offshore oil drilling potential. Gary P. Luquette, President of Chevron North America Exploration and Production Co., argues that Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil drilling could add a substantial amount to our oil supplies. The good news: the OCS has significant potential. Over time, it could add 1 million more barrels of oil and natural gas equivalent a day--potentially representing a fifth of the current total U.S. oil production. Advances in technology could increase that amount dramatically. Some people believe that if the United States just opens up currently closed off areas for drilling oil then there'd be so much the US wouldn't need to import any oil and oil would... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3366166</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3366166</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Peak Oil In 2014?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3354275&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F007003.html</link>
            <description>Researchers at Kuwait University predict world conventional oil production will peak in 2014. In a finding that may speed efforts to conserve oil and intensify the search for alternative fuel sources, scientists in Kuwait predict that world conventional crude oil production will peak in 2014  almost a decade earlier than some other predictions. Their study is in ACS' Energy &amp; Fuels, a bi-monthly journal. Ibrahim Nashawi and colleagues point out that rapid growth in global oil consumption has sparked a growing interest in predicting &quot;peak oil&quot;  the point where oil production reaches a maximum and then declines. Scientists have developed several models to forecast this point, and some put the date at 2020 or later. One of the... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3354275</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3354275</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Richard Branson: Oil Crunch In 5 Years</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3254426&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F006931.html</link>
            <description>Virgin Group boss and billionaire Richard Branson joins the Peak Oil crowd. &quot;The next five years will see us face another crunch  the oil crunch. This time, we do have the chance to prepare. The challenge is to use that time well,&quot; Branson will say. &quot;Our message to government and businesses is clear: act,&quot; he says in a foreword to a new report on the crisis. &quot;Don't let the oil crunch catch us out in the way that the credit crunch did.&quot; One wonders what Branson thinks this means for Virgin Air. Is he still buying airplanes? What's he planning to fuel them with? Other notable British CEOs join Branson in citing the looming threat. Other British executives who... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3254426</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3254426</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>China And India Displacing OECD Oil Consumption</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3137485&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F006832.html</link>
            <description>Writing in a comment on a post at The Oil Drum Gregor Macdonald very succinctly sums up an energy future where China, India, and other rapidly developing countries gradually displace OECD countries as oil purchasers. High oil prices are more painful to the OECD/Developed world user than the Developing world user. In the Developing world coal accounts for the largest chunk of BTU consumption, and the marginal utility to the new user of oil is high. In other words, the OECD user is embedded in a system where the historical consumption pattern has been to use much more oil per capita. But in the developing world, just a small amount of oil to the new user of oil is transformational.... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3137485</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3137485</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Will Natural Gas Shale Plays Replace Dwindling Oil?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2894471&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F006632.html</link>
            <description>In recent years the development of technology for extracting natural gas from shale has boosted natural gas production from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and Barnett shales. While Peak Oil still looks... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2894471</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2894471</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Arctic Has 13% Of Remaining Undiscovered Oil?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2814385&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F006550.html</link>
            <description>An article about the potential for oil discovery in the Arctic gives a sense of how much oil is left to be discovered. The other man who knows interesting things... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2814385</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2814385</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cherry Picking Climate Catastrophes: Response to Conor Clarke, Part II</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2657586&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2F4Pc9P-lMicE%2F</link>
            <description>Conor Clarke at The Atlantic blog, raised several issues with my study, “What to Do About Climate Change,” which Cato published last year.
One of Conor Clarke’s comments was that my analysis did not extend beyond the 21st century. He found this problematic because, as Conor put it, climate change would extend beyond 2100, and even if GDP is higher in 2100 with unfettered global warming than without, it’s not obvious that this GDP would continue to be higher “in the year 2200 or 2300 or 3758”. I addressed this portion of his argument in Part I of my response. Here I will address the second part of this argument, that “the possibility of ‘catastrophic’ climate change events — those with low probability but extremely high cost — becomes real after 2100.”
The examples o...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2657586</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:53:05 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2657586</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>1999 Oil Production Model Pretty Accurate So Far</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2576574&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F006347.html</link>
            <description>Euan Mearns, writing on The Oil Drum Europe, takes a look at predictions made by Richard Duncan and Walter Youngquist in a paper they published in 1999 about expected future... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2576574</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2576574</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Global Taxes and More Foreign Aid</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2464100&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=36438&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FCato-at-liberty%2F%7E3%2FeHk3_GJW6JM%2F</link>
            <description>The U.K.-based Guardian reports that the United Nations and other international bureaucracies dealing with so-called climate change are scheming to impose global taxes. That&amp;#8217;s not too surprising, but it is discouraging to read that the Obama Administration appears to be acquiescing to these attacks on U.S. fiscal sovereignty. The Administration also has indicated it wants to squander an additional $400 billion on foreign aid, adding injury to injury:
&amp;#8230;rich countries will be asked to accept a compulsory levy on international flight tickets and shipping fuel to raise billions of dollars to help the world&amp;#8217;s poorest countries adapt to combat climate change. The suggestions come at the start of the second week in the latest round of UN climate talks in Bonn, where 192 countrie...</description>
            <author>Cato-at-liberty</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2464100</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:45:06 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2464100</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>David Rutledge Sees Far Less Coal Remaining</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2052765&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005806.html</link>
            <description>Projections of future coal burning maybe excessively optimistic or pessimistic (depending on your point of view) because the amount recoverable from the ground might be far less than governments project.... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2052765</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2052765</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Alberta Oil Sands Production To Fall Short Of Goal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2035625&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005791.html</link>
            <description>The long term growth in capital infrastructure to extra more oil out of tar sands in Alberta is called into question as large tar sands projects get canceled in response... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2035625</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2035625</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Methane Hydrate Extraction To Become Viable?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2033169&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005785.html</link>
            <description>Maybe methane hydrates will become an economically affordable source of methane for natural gas. Hydrates have been hailed as a paradigm shift in how to achieve energy independence and as... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2033169</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2033169</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Marginal Oil Production Costs Rising</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1730685&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005483.html</link>
            <description>Rising marginal production costs for additional barrels of oil put a pretty high long term floor on oil prices. Last year analysts estimated it cost around $60 a barrel to... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1730685</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1730685</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Synfuels Internationl Cuts Natural Gas To Liquids Cost</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1709140&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005456.html</link>
            <description>Synfuels International claims they've found a way to cut the cost of converting natural gas to liquid fuels. A Texas company says that it has developed a cheaper and cleaner... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1709140</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1709140</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Oil Consumption Drops In Developed Countries</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1689015&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005425.html</link>
            <description>Oil prices have declined on demand destruction. The CEO of BP observes a big decline in oil demand in developed countries. Tony Hayward, chief executive of BP, said last week... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1689015</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1689015</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Saudi Arabia Will Not Achieve Oil Production Goal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1616024&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005355.html</link>
            <description>Will Saudi Arabia manage to raise their production to 12.5 million barrels per day? BusinessWeek has a reliable source that says the Saudis can not ramp up their production nearly... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1616024</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1616024</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IEA Sees More Rapid Decline In Existing Oil Fields</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1581928&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005339.html</link>
            <description>The latest International Energy Agency Medium-Term Oil Market Report (MTOMR) has an important change from previous reports: The IEA has increased their projected rate of production decline from existing oil... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1581928</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1581928</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>US Oil Consumption Falls Back To 2002 Level</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1556334&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005327.html</link>
            <description>For most of the post-WWII era US oil consumption went up year after year. One deviation from that came in the early 1980s. An even longer lasting and probably permanent... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1556334</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1556334</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fatih Birol Sees Peak Oil Soon</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1536460&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005301.html</link>
            <description>Mainstream purveyors of conventional wisdom have for years dismissed or ignored the prospect of a world peak in oil production before the 2030s or later. But high oil prices are... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1536460</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1536460</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Big Oil Producers Cut Exports In 2007</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1477939&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005229.html</link>
            <description>As reported by the Wall Street Journal the Export Land Model comes home to roost. The big oil producers are producing less oil. And about one of those other big... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1477939</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1477939</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Fact or Ficton: Obesity is Contributing to Global Warming?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1451778&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34872&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthbolt.net%2F2008%2F05%2F19%2Ffact-or-ficton-obesity-is-contributing-to-global-warming%2F</link>
            <description>Okay, don&amp;#8217;t shoot the messenger but the word out on the streets is that &amp;#8216;obesity is to blame for global warming.&amp;#8217;
So is there merit to this hypothesis or is it just one more way of laying a guilt trip on those who are overweight?
Let&amp;#8217;s look at the facts.
This recent discussion relating obesity to global warming started when The Lancet published a letter by two British scientists that stated the obese population consumes 18% more food energy than the normal weight population. And as a result&amp;#8230;
&amp;#8220;&amp;#8230;more transportation fuel energy will be used to transport the increase mass of the obese population, which will increase even further if, as is likely, the overweight people in response to their increased body mass choose to walk less and drive more.&amp;#8221;
T...</description>
            <author>Healthbolt</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1451778</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:10:44 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1451778</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Kashagan Oil Field Production Start Hits Another Delay</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1439579&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005196.html</link>
            <description>On a day when oil hit a new intra-day trading high of $126.40 we also received indications that attempts to boost world oil production continue to hit roadblocks. Eni, Italy's... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1439579</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1439579</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Mainstream Takes Oil Supply Problem More Seriously</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1405365&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005168.html</link>
            <description>A little over a week ago Jad Mouawad of the New York Times wrote a piece on rising demand for oil and worries about supplies. His piece, while drawing attention... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1405365</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1405365</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>$225 Per Barrel Oil Seen By 2012</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1397662&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005159.html</link>
            <description>Jeff Rubin of investment and merchant bank CIBC says a continuing world oil production plateau combined with growth in demand will double the price of oil in the next 4... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1397662</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1397662</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Time To Think About Petroleum Oil Substitutes</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1386827&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005152.html</link>
            <description>With oil hitting $117 per barrel major media organizations are paying more attention to the future availability of oil. On the one hand, a New York Times discusses worries about... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1386827</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1386827</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Peak Oil By 2012?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1320541&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F005082.html</link>
            <description>Some analysts think we are close to world Peak Oil production. Chris Skrebowski, a researcher for the Energy Institute in Britain, told delegates that the oil supply will peak in... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1320541</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1320541</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stuart Staniford: Peak Oil And The Fallacy Of Reversibility</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1167213&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004939.html</link>
            <description>On The Oil Drum Stuart Staniford argues agriculture will not deindustrialize when the production of oil peaks and goes into long term decline. So when you industrialize a society, is... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1167213</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1167213</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New York Times Notices Oil Export Land Model Problem</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1082083&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004845.html</link>
            <description>When a tree falls in a forest where no human will hear it does it make any sounds? Yes, but some like to pretend no in order to make the... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1082083</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1082083</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Wall Street Journal Takes Peak Oil Seriously</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1037773&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004804.html</link>
            <description>On the front page today the Wall Street Journal basically legitimized the coming of peak oil. A growing number of oil-industry chieftains are endorsing an idea long deemed fringe: The... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1037773</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1037773</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Royal Dutch Shell In Lead With Oil Shale Technology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1015780&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004768.html</link>
            <description>Royal Dutch Shell decided to lift some (though not all) of the secrecy surrounding their research into extracting oil from oil shale in Colorado and Wyoming. Jon Birger of Fortune... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1015780</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1015780</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Subsidized Gasoline Prices Eat Into Venezuelan Oil Exports</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=989688&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004735.html</link>
            <description>Venezuelans are buying big cars because their gas is subsidized and cheap. Motorists in the United States smarting from rising gasoline prices, take note: Mr. Taurisano pays the equivalent of... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=989688</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">989688</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>India Embracing Nuclear Power While China Sticks With Coal</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=980546&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004718.html</link>
            <description>More coal means even more pollution. A new report by the International Atomic Energy Agency forecasts India will increase nuclear production eight-fold by 2030 to account for 26 percent of... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=980546</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">980546</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Opposition Builds Against Coal Electric Power Plants</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=965208&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004694.html</link>
            <description>Environmentalists who oppose coal-based electric power generation are beginning to make headway in blocking new coal electric power plants. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment yesterday became the first... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=965208</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">965208</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Declining Exports From Big Oil Exporters Expected</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=911870&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004629.html</link>
            <description>Economist Jeffrey Rubin sees higher oil prices in part due to rising demand in oil exporting countries. CORK, IRELAND, Sept. 17 /CNW/ - CIBC (CM: TSX; NYSE) - Oil prices... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=911870</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">911870</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Former Shell Chairman Foresees $150 Barrel Oil</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=876044&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004593.html</link>
            <description>But since we just hit $80 per barrel $150 is less than a doubling. What, me worry? Lord Oxburgh, the former chairman of Shell, has issued a stark warning that... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=876044</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">876044</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Biotechnology is SO 19___</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=811349&amp;cid=t_141311_107_f&amp;fid=36045&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbayblab.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F08%2Fbiotechnology-is-so-19.html</link>
            <description>Recently the AC questioned the novelty of human genome sequencing (albeit from fossilized specimens), the work of one of Discover magazine's picks for last year's scientist of the year. He has inspired me to also question the novelty of their other two picks, just for old time's sake:1. Using microorganisms to produce fossil fuel alternatives is SO 1934 (and probably even older).William J. Hale of Dow Chemicals discussed this idea as a part of his broader plan for increasing the scope of agricultural manufacturing in his 1934 classic The Farm Chemurgic. I'm sure the notion had been floating around before, as it was well-known by this time that ethanol is a natural product of fermentation. But hey, who wants to burn it when you can get hammered and take off on a gasoline-guzzling joyride in...</description>
            <author>Bayblab</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=811349</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:10:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">811349</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IEA: Oil Supply Crunch After 2010</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=725131&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004381.html</link>
            <description>Peak Oil anyone? The latest Medium-Term Oil Market Report from the International Energy Agency (IEA) paints a moderately bleak picture on oil availability in the next 5 years. World oil... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=725131</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">725131</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Limited Hydrocarbons Mean Little Global Warming?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=696883&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004350.html</link>
            <description>Dastardly humans won't be able to fry the world with excessive amounts of fossil fuels burning because we do not have enough fossil fuels left to burn to cause a... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=696883</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">696883</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>American Coal Reserves Not So Big</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=692360&amp;cid=t_141311_87_f&amp;fid=34902&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futurepundit.com%2Farchives%2F004343.html</link>
            <description>Heard the oft repeated claim that America has enough coal to last 250 years? A new report from the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) claims recoverable US reserves are... (Source: FuturePundit)</description>
            <author>FuturePundit</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=692360</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">692360</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

