<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>MedWorm Tags: friendfeed</title>
        <description>MedWorm provides a medical RSS filtering service. Over 6000 RSS medical sources are combined and output via different filters. This feed contains the latest medical blog items that have been tagged with 'friendfeed'.</description>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.medworm.com/rss/search.php?qu=%22friendfeed%22&t=%22friendfeed%22&r=Exact&o=d&f=tag]]></link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:05:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <item>
            <title>Analysis of ISMB coverage at FriendFeed: 2008 – 2011</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=5077941&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F07%2F28%2Fanalysis-of-ismb-coverage-at-friendfeed-2008-2011%2F</link>
            <description>ISMB/ECCB 2011 was held between July 15-19 this year and as in previous years, FriendFeed was used to cover the meeting.
Last year, I wrote a post about how to use R to analyse the coverage. I was planning something similar for 2011 when I thought: we have 4 years of ISMB at FriendFeed now &amp;#8211; why not look at all of them?
So I did. Read on for the details.




   1. First &amp;#8211; an apology
In my post from last year, I included some R code which will grab a FriendFeed feed in JSON format using the API and convert it to an R list. I would have used it again this year, except that the ISMB 2008 feed is no longer a complete archive of the 2008 meeting. This is, unfortunately, my fault &amp;#8211; but all is not lost.
I decided to leave FriendFeed earlier this year and began by deleting the se...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=5077941</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:40:17 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">5077941</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Farewell FriendFeed. It’s been fun.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4419352&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F01%2F31%2Ffarewell-friendfeed-its-been-fun%2F</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;ve been a strong proponent of FriendFeed since its launch. Its technology, clean interface and &amp;#8220;data first, then conversations&amp;#8221; approach have made it a highly-successful experiment in social networking for scientists (and other groups). So you may be surprised to hear that from today, I will no longer be importing items into FriendFeed, or participating in the conversations at other feeds.
Here&amp;#8217;s a brief explanation and some thoughts on my online activity in the coming months.

The value of FriendFeed
FriendFeed is simply an aggregator, displaying items from other online services. There&amp;#8217;s nothing special about that: other sites do the same thing (although many have fallen by the wayside) and were FriendFeed to disappear, those items would still exist at thei...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4419352</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:34:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4419352</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>APIs have let me down part 2/2: FriendFeed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4405960&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F01%2F27%2Fapis-have-let-me-down-part-22-friendfeed%2F</link>
            <description>In part 1, I described some frustrations arising out of a work project, using the Array Express API. I find that one way to deal mentally with these situations is to spend some time on a fun project, using similar programming techniques. A potential downside of this approach is that if your fun project goes bad, you&amp;#8217;re really frustrated. That&amp;#8217;s when it&amp;#8217;s time to abandon the digital world, go outside and enjoy nature.
Here then, is why I decided to build another small project around FriendFeed, how its failure has led me to question the value of FriendFeed for the first time and why my time as a FriendFeed user might be up.

At the beginning of each year, I frequently experience a period of angst with respect to my social network and other web activity. Specifically, I ask...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4405960</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:06:30 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4405960</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>APIs have let me down part 1/2: ArrayExpress</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4405961&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2011%2F01%2F27%2Fapis-have-let-me-down-part-12-arrayexpress%2F</link>
            <description>The API &amp;#8211; Application Programming Interface &amp;#8211; is, in principle, a wonderful thing. You make a request to a server using a URL and back come lovely, structured data, ready to parse and analyse. We&amp;#8217;ve begun to demand that all online data sources offer an API and lament the fact that so few online biological databases do so.
Better though, to have no API at all than one which is poorly implemented and leads to frustration? I&amp;#8217;m beginning to think so, after recent experiences on both a work project and one of my &amp;#8220;fun side projects&amp;#8221;. Let&amp;#8217;s start with the work project, an attempt to mine a subset of the ArrayExpress microarray database.

1. Introduction
ArrayExpress is an online database of microarray experiments, organised by both gene (the expression at...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4405961</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:04:11 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4405961</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Social media and microbiology education</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4117879&amp;cid=t_173036_139_f&amp;fid=38879&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FVirologyBlog%2F%7E3%2FTuRVxRrSPD8%2F</link>
            <description>Readers of this blog know that I embrace social media for teaching virology. My experience with two types of social media, blogging and podcasting, has been published as an Opinions piece by PLoS Pathogens (read the full text or download the pdf file). In this article I discuss how social media is becoming an increasingly integral component of both research and education in the world of science. My experience has convinced me that scientists must embrace these applications to not only better communicate their work to the public, but to facilitate the progress of research.
Blogging and podcasting are not the only forms of social media that I have found useful for teaching and research. I use Twitter to locate or disseminate information about virology. I often tweet when I write a new blog ...</description>
            <author>virology blog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4117879</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:28:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4117879</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brief words on Cliqset</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3903081&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F08%2F26%2Fbrief-words-on-cliqset%2F</link>
            <description>Since I seem to be at least partially-responsible for a burst of new users at Cliqset, I thought I&amp;#8217;d clarify my own ideas about our future use of so-called &amp;#8220;lifestream&amp;#8221; applications.
In my opinion, FriendFeed is by far the best approach that I&amp;#8217;ve seen, so far, to creating discussions and communities around items of information. Unfortunately, it is unlikely to survive much longer. Yes, its creators tell us that their intention is to keep it running &amp;#8220;indefinitely&amp;#8221;, but the cracks are beginning to show. Search no longer works, feeds do not import reliably, outages are becoming more frequent and lasting longer.
It&amp;#8217;s natural, then, to ask if anything similar exists. Search Google for &amp;#8220;lifestream application&amp;#8221; and you&amp;#8217;ll find many alter...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3903081</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:01:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3903081</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lazy post:  a Life Scientists best-of</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3798733&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2F29%2Flazy-post-a-life-scientists-best-of%2F</link>
            <description>When stuck for ideas or pressed for time, a blogger can always fall back on a round-up of activity from elsewhere on the web. Yes, it&amp;#8217;s time for a &amp;#8220;best of the past 14 days&amp;#8221; from the FriendFeed Life Scientists group.
Just a slight twist to make it more exciting (?) &amp;#8211; we&amp;#8217;ll automate the process using the API and a little Ruby.


#/usr/bin/ruby
require &amp;quot;rubygems&amp;quot;
require &amp;quot;json/pure&amp;quot;
require &amp;quot;open-uri&amp;quot;

bestof = JSON.parse(open(&amp;quot;http://friendfeed-api.com/v2/feed/the-life-scientists/summary/14&amp;quot;).read)
0.upto(9) {|entry|
 url = bestof['entries'][entry]['url']
 body = bestof['entries'][entry]['body']
 puts &amp;quot;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href='#{url}'&amp;gt;ff#{entry+1}&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt; - #{body}&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;quot;
}

Run, copy output and paste to ...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3798733</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:10:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3798733</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>“Smile, Open Your Eyes, Love and Go On.”</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3795022&amp;cid=t_173036_136_f&amp;fid=37846&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fhealthinfoispower.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2F28%2Fsmile-open-your-eyes-love-and-go-on%2F</link>
            <description>Today marks the 2nd anniversary of Libby&amp;#8217;s death from ovarian cancer at the age of 26. Although the family healing process continues, we celebrate Libby&amp;#8217;s life formally on this day to honor her memory, and remind ourselves that life is precious and should not be taken for granted. Today marks the 2nd anniversary of Libby&amp;#8217;s [...] (Source: Libby's H*O*P*E*)</description>
            <author>Libby's H*O*P*E*</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3795022</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:00:47 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3795022</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Analysing the ISMB 2010 meeting using R</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3767238&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2F20%2Fanalysing-the-ismb-2010-meeting-using-r%2F</link>
            <description>The colossus of bioinformatics meetings, ISMB, convened in Boston this year from July 9 &amp;#8211; 13. As in recent years, the meeting was covered online at its website, FriendFeed and Twitter.
I thought it would be fun to run a quick analysis of activity at the FriendFeed room using R.

1. Fetch the data
We can use the FriendFeed API to fetch data in JSON format. R provides two useful packages: RCurl, for making the HTTP request and rjson (or RJSONIO), to parse the results into a list. Since we don&amp;#8217;t know in advance how many entries to expect, we set some arbitrarily large maximum number of entries, loop towards it and break when no more entries are returned.

library(RCurl)
library(rjson)

ismb.url &amp;lt;- &amp;quot;http://friendfeed-api.com/v2/feed/ismb2010&amp;quot;
ismb.data &amp;lt;- list()

fo...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3767238</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:24:19 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3767238</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Stack Exchange sites for science</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3570009&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35021&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FYourBonesGotALittleMachine%2F%7E3%2FO4btHltj2IM%2F</link>
            <description>Recently I&amp;#8217;ve noticed the emergence of several Stack Overflow-style sites for science-related questions and answers. For those unfamiliar with Stack Overflow &amp;#8211; it&amp;#8217;s a question and answer &amp;#8216;forum&amp;#8217; for computer programmers that keeps the signal-to-noise ratio very high through a carefully refined reputation system. Late last year the creators of Stack Overflow launched a hosted service called Stack Exchange, which allows anyone to start their own &amp;#8220;Stack Overflow&amp;#8221; based around any topic.
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/alicebartlett/ / CC BY-NC 2.0
The service is was a little pricey ($129+/month), and I suspect this is one reason why a few open source clones inspired by Stack Overflow also exist. Since then, Stack Exchange sites (or clones) have prolifer...</description>
            <author>Your bones got a little machine.</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3570009</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 05:33:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3570009</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>StackExchange sites for science</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3556283&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35021&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FYourBonesGotALittleMachine%2F%7E3%2FO4btHltj2IM%2F</link>
            <description>Recently I&amp;#8217;ve noticed the emergence of several Stack Overflow-style sites for science-related questions and answers. For those unfamiliar with Stack Overflow &amp;#8211; it&amp;#8217;s a question and answer &amp;#8216;forum&amp;#8217; for computer programmers that keeps the signal-to-noise ratio very high through a carefully refined reputation system. Late last year the creators of Stack Overflow launched a hosted service called Stack Exchange, which allows anyone to start their own &amp;#8220;Stack Overflow&amp;#8221; based around any topic.
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/alicebartlett/ / CC BY-NC 2.0
The service is was a little pricey ($129+/month), and I suspect this is one reason why a few open source clones inspired by Stack Overflow also exist. Since then, Stack Exchange sites (or clones) have prolifer...</description>
            <author>Your bones got a little machine.</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3556283</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 05:33:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3556283</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>This is FriendFeed…</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3456828&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F04%2F10%2Fthis-is-friendfeed%2F</link>
            <description>&amp;#8230;at its very best.
Scientists Embrace Openness &amp;#8211; discuss.
Filed under: open science, web resources Tagged: discussion, friendfeed, social (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3456828</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:19:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3456828</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>ISMB/ECCB 2009 reports</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3223442&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F01%2F30%2Fismb-2009-reports%2F</link>
            <description>Great to see more reports describing the use of online tools to cover scientific meetings. Here are the publications, from PLoS Computational Biology:

Live Coverage of Scientific Conferences Using Web Technologies.
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000563
Live Coverage of Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology/European Conference on Computational Biology (ISMB/ECCB) 2009.
doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000640

And here&amp;#8217;s Ally a.k.a the robo-blogger on Social Networking and Guidelines for Life Science Conferences.
Looks like we&amp;#8217;ve started a trend, long may it continue at future meetings.
Filed under: bioinformatics, meetings, publications Tagged: 2009, eccb, friendfeed, ismb, report (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3223442</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:22:12 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3223442</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How to: archive data via an API using Ruby and MongoDB</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3149253&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F01%2F07%2Fhow-to-archive-data-via-an-api-using-ruby-and-mongodb%2F</link>
            <description>I was going to title this post &amp;#8220;How to: archive a FriendFeed feed in MongoDB&amp;#8221;. The example code does just that but (a) I fear that this blog suggests a near-obsession with FriendFeed (see tag cloud, right sidebar) and (b) the principles apply to any API that returns JSON. There are rare examples of biological data with JSON output in the wild, e.g. the ArrayExpress Gene Expression Atlas. So I&amp;#8217;m still writing a bioinformatics blog ;-)
Let&amp;#8217;s go straight to the code:

#!/usr/bin/ruby

require &amp;quot;rubygems&amp;quot;
require &amp;quot;mongo&amp;quot;
require &amp;quot;json/pure&amp;quot;
require &amp;quot;open-uri&amp;quot;

# db config
db = Mongo::Connection.new.db('friendfeed')
col = db.collection('lifesci')

# fetch json
0.step(9900, 100) {|n|
 f = open(&amp;quot;http://friendfeed-api.com/v2/feed/...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3149253</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:17:46 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3149253</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Life Scientists at FriendFeed: 2009 summary</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3115235&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F12%2F23%2Fthe-life-scientists-at-friendfeed-2009-summary%2F</link>
            <description>The Life Scientists 2009
It&amp;#8217;s Christmas Eve tomorrow and so I declare the year over. My Christmas gift to you is a summary of activity in 2009 at the FriendFeed Life Scientists group. It&amp;#8217;s crafted using R + Ruby, with raw data and some code snippets available. If you want to see the most popular items from the group this year, head down to the bottom of this post.
(Note: this post is a work in progress)

The contributors
First of all, take a look at yourselves. There are, allegedly, 1250 subscribers to the group, but I can only retrieve profiles for 1053 of them.
248 of you are rather shy, opting for the default avatar and one or two of you look rather like porn stars. If nothing else, this illustrates the difficulty of compiling reliable user statistics.
Here&amp;#8217;s how this ...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3115235</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:15:40 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3115235</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>APIs: I wish the life sciences would learn from social networks</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=3079512&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F12%2F11%2Fapis-i-wish-the-life-sciences-would-learn-from-social-networks%2F</link>
            <description>I was prompted by a thread on the apparent decline of FriendFeed to look for evidence of declining participation in my networks.

First, a quick and dirty Ruby script, tls.rb to grab the Life Scientists feed and count the likes and comments:

#!/usr/bin/ruby

require 'rubygems'
require 'json/pure'
require 'net/http'
require 'open-uri'

def format_date(d)
 if d =~ /(\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})T(\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2})Z/
  return &amp;quot;#{$1},#{$2}&amp;quot;
  else
  return d
 end
end

def count_items(i)
 if i.nil?
  return 0
  else
  return i.count
 end
end

n = ARGV[0]
u = &amp;quot;http://friendfeed-api.com/v2/feed/the-life-scientists?start=#{n}&amp;quot;
f = open(u).read
j = JSON.parse(f)

j.each_pair do |k,v|
 if k == &amp;quot;entries&amp;quot;
  v.each do |entry|
   date = format_date(entry['date'])
   likes = count_it...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=3079512</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:50:49 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">3079512</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Beware of Top 50 “Great Tools to Double Check your Doctor” or whatever Lists.</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2751832&amp;cid=t_173036_86_f&amp;fid=38272&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flaikaspoetnik.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F09%2F01%2Fbeware-of-top-50-great-tools-to-double-check-your-doctor-or-whatever-lists%2F</link>
            <description>Just the other week I wrote a post &amp;#8220;Vanity is the Quicksand of Reasoning: Beware of Top 100 and 50 lists!&amp;#8221;
In short this post describes that (some) Top 100 etc lists may not be as useful or innocent as they seem. Some of these lists are created by real scam-sites, who&amp;#8217;s only goal is to [...] (Source: Laika's MedLibLog)</description>
            <author>Laika's MedLibLog</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2751832</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:33:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2751832</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FriendFeed Life Scientists: 14-day summary</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2741537&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F08%2F28%2Ffriendfeed-life-scientists-14-day-summary%2F</link>
            <description>Since I haven&amp;#8217;t posted for 14 days, what better (and lazier) way to post something than to surf over to a 14-day summary from the Life Scientists Group and link to the top ten items!

Review process files in the EMBO Journal &amp;#8211; but why only for &amp;#8220;the majority of papers&amp;#8221;?
How XML threatens Big Data. Or not. How JSON might be an alternative &amp;#8211; or not.
Solve any computer problem &amp;#8211; with this classic XKCD flowchart.
Science reviews the revolution in &amp;#8217;strategic scientific reading&amp;#8217; &amp;#8211; are they way behind the curve, or providing a useful summary for the uninitiated?
Best practice in microbial genome annotation &amp;#8211; spirited discussion on the nature of best bioinformatics practice.
FriendFeed Life Scientists user survey &amp;#8211; no further word on...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2741537</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:03:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2741537</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The best analogy for the FriendFeed purchase</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2691710&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35024&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FBlindscientist%2F%7E3%2Fvj5BIAQ6hN8%2F</link>
            <description>I don&amp;#8217;t like Facebook, the same way I don&amp;#8217;t like Orkut. The only reason for me to use Facebook is contact people I don&amp;#8217;t see in years, and that facet of it I appreciate. On the other hand I really liked FriendFeed, which is (was) a great service, but didn&amp;#8217;t have a commercialization plan, hence it was sold.
Anyway, the best analogy I can make of this purchase is: It&amp;#8217;s like when that indie, miniscule band that you love and cherish goes mainstream. In a matter of seconds, the whole world knows that band and you don&amp;#8217;t like it anymore, because you &amp;#8220;discovered&amp;#8221; it, because they were &amp;#8220;connected&amp;#8221; only to you, not the whole world. 
Now, FriendFeed is Facebook, and Facebook is mainstream, and we scientists need to stay indie, or at least ke...</description>
            <author>Blind.Scientist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2691710</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:53:15 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2691710</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Great work, ISMB microblogging team</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2571048&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F07%2F03%2Fgreat-work-ismb-microblogging-team%2F</link>
            <description>Another year, another ISMB/ECCB meeting and &amp;#8211; another great blogging effort.
It&amp;#8217;s all at the FriendFeed group: ISMB/ECCB Stockholm 2009, with outgoing links to individual blogs too.
Thanks and congratulations to all involved for a great effort. Looking forward to the official write-up.
Posted in bioinformatics, computing, meetings, web resources Tagged: friendfeed, iscb, ismb, microblogging (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2571048</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:42:35 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2571048</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Semantic Web of Life Science</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=4098296&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35016&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffgibson.com%2F2009%2F04%2F25%2Fthe-semantic-web-of-life-science%2F</link>
            <description>This summary was born out of a question  on Twitter and percolated to FriendFeed, which was “Who is using RDF and integrating other resources at the minute and what are those resources? From this question, several resources were highlighted.
UniProt. The comprehensive resource of protein information is available as an RDF distribution and each Protein record has a corresponding RDF download option.
Phil pointed out Semantic Systems Biology, As systems biology is largely concerned with representing networks and interactions at a systems level, a language like RDF would seem an obvious choice to represent this type of knowledge, to aid semantic description and data integration.
Melanie pointed out the following resources such as Bio2RDF. This project aims to RDF-ize numerous public life-s...</description>
            <author>peanutbutter</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=4098296</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:45:02 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4098296</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>12 Ways to Fight Mental Health Stigma With Social Media</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2367524&amp;cid=t_173036_109_f&amp;fid=35044&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fadultaddstrengths.com%2F2009%2F04%2F25%2F12-ways-to-fight-mental-health-stigma-with-social-media%2F</link>
            <description>Post from: Adult ADD Strengths
12 Ways to Fight Mental Health Stigma With Social Media
This is for a presentation I&amp;#8217;m doing at Mental Health Camp Vancouver (a conference combining social media with mental health) called ADHD - Busting the myths, breaking the stigma, showing reality, one post and tweet at a time. While ADHD is especially stigmatized as the orphan of mental health conditions, especially Adult ADHD, it&amp;#8217;s not the only one that suffers stigma.
12 Ways to Fight Mental Health Stigma With Social Media
Arranged from more anonymous to more personal, and less effort to more effort. There&amp;#8217;s a choice for everyone.
1. Click on a factually correct, non stigmatizing mental health article, or personal story via a blog post, tweet, podcast, YouTube video, Facebook update, ...</description>
            <author>Adult ADD Strengths</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2367524</comments>
            <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:31:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2367524</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>This should not be here … or Notes to a bioinformatician – two years later</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2349281&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35024&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FBlindscientist%2F%7E3%2FJqd895EuEzA%2F</link>
            <description>Image via CrunchBase



I was contacted a couple of months (maybe more) to write a guest entry for their blog. I did that and on March 11th I sent the text you see below. It&amp;#8217;s not my best creation (and not the worst, believe me), but as they&amp;#8217;re taking so long to publish it and I don&amp;#8217;t want it to go to waste, I&amp;#8217;m publishing it. 
&amp;#8212;
Exactly two years ago (or almost exactly), I posted a follow-up blog entry to Notes to a young computational biologist. I still believe that 97% of all advice is worthless, but I also believe that it&amp;#8217;s worth sharing your experiences as it might be useful to someone in the future.
In this guest blogging, I will examine those two-year old posts, mixing, matching, remixing, adding and deleting thins. Consider this my four cents on ...</description>
            <author>Blind.Scientist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2349281</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:07:25 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2349281</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brief words on the FriendFeed beta</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2323829&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F04%2F07%2Fbrief-words-on-the-friendfeed-beta%2F</link>
            <description>The best place for discussion about the latest FriendFeed beta is at FriendFeed, of course. However, it would be amiss of me not to record a couple of thoughts.
On the whole, there&amp;#8217;s little about which I feel strongly for better or worse - which rather suggests that the current design is just fine. With three major exceptions:


The service favicons and service filtering
Someone has decided that the source of information is less important than the content - in fact, that the source is irrelevant. I and many others disagree strongly. It seems that many people use the small icons that identify the item source as a subconscious visual cue, in ways that the designers have not anticipated. Richard describes this concisely.
Retain source icon and ability to filter by source.
Merging of roo...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2323829</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:06:37 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2323829</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The BioSysBio conference 2009</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2296199&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35016&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeanutbutter.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F03%2F26%2Fthe-biosysbio-conference-2009%2F</link>
            <description>Image via Wikipedia



The premise of the BioSysBio conference is to
bring together the best young researchers working in Synthetic Biology, Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, providing a platform to hear and discuss the most recent and scientific advances and applications in these fascinating fields.
This years BioSysBio 09 has just taken place in Cambridge, UK. The program was more slanted towards synthetic biology rather than more traditional systems biology, which I think reflects the growing momentum that synthetic biology has gained in the past year. I think this is a good progress and  I was secretley glad as I did not want to spend 3 days looking at massive network diagrams squashed onto power point slides.
This was the first conference I had been to that the organisers actually ...</description>
            <author>peanutbutter</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2296199</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:00:41 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2296199</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Choosing a license for your ontology</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2260167&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35028&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flurena.vox.com%2Flibrary%2Fpost%2Fchoosing-a-license-for-your-ontology.html%3F_c%3Dfeed-rss</link>
            <description>Over on Friendfeed this week, I started a discussion (both in The Life Scientists room and in the Science 2.0 room) about ontologies and licensing them. I am creating a couple, and was trying to determine whether I should use some flavor of CC lic...  

  Read and post comments

 | 

  
  Send to a friend (Source: Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics)</description>
            <author>Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2260167</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:29:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2260167</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Add FriendFeed comments and likes to WordPress.com posts using Ruby</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2163540&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F02%2F06%2Fadd-friendfeed-comments-and-likes-to-wordpresscom-posts-using-ruby%2F</link>
            <description>The problem
FriendFeed aggregates your blog posts from WordPress.com. Naturally, people prefer to comment on your post at FriendFeed - it&amp;#8217;s quicker, easier and more fun. However, you would like to see an indication of this activity back at the original blog post.
The solutions
You could self-host your blog using software from WordPress.org. This allows you to install plugins such as FriendFeed comments. But you&amp;#8217;re at WordPress.com because you don&amp;#8217;t want to self-host, right? So you just have to live with the absence of useful plugins. My advice: don&amp;#8217;t try discussing issues like this one in the WordPress.com forums unless you&amp;#8217;re the kind of person who enjoys comment threads at YouTube.
For intelligent, mature and constructive discussion go to FriendFeed of cours...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2163540</comments>
            <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 07:50:43 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2163540</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Brief notes on export from FriendFeed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2150752&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F02%2F02%2Fbrief-notes-on-export-from-friendfeed%2F</link>
            <description>During discussion of the ISMB 2008 room, Thomas asks: &amp;#8220;Does FF really provide long-term archival?&amp;#8221; Lars points out that it&amp;#8217;s as permanent as anything else on the Web, Dorothea points out that FriendFeed offer no guarantees and Deepak discusses the FriendFeed API.
Question: how useful is the FriendFeed API as a tool to, for example, archive a FriendFeed room?

We can access the ISMB 2008 room via the API using a URL like this:

curl &amp;#8220;http://friendfeed.com/api/feed/room/ismb-2008?format=xml&amp;#8221; &amp;gt; ismb.xml

We can also retrieve items in other formats by substituting &amp;#8220;xml&amp;#8221; in the URL with one of: json, atom, rss. Note that where a FriendFeed post contains a &amp;#8220;N more comments&amp;#8221; link, those comments are actually present on the page and revealed...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2150752</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:01:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2150752</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why Open Science/Research won’t work, at least for now, a story from FriendFeed</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2125284&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35024&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedproxy.google.com%2F%7Er%2FBlindscientist%2F%7E3%2FRuLoNou1lAk%2F</link>
            <description>So, we&amp;#8217;re back! And to the old-new story of why the Open Science movement will fail, at least for now. I was planning to post something on a different note, but a recent discussion thread on FriendFeed called me to post about it. 
This thread was started by a blog entry the poster-boy of the Open Science/Research/Buzz-Word-of-the-moment Movement, Cameron Neylon. 
As most of the &amp;#8220;literature&amp;#8221; you find in his blog, very well written, he uses a metaphor of some mundane human social behaviour/activity trying to captivate the reader and bring him to his &amp;#8220;open&amp;#8221; universe. Sometimes it&amp;#8217;s related to a train commute, sometimes a music or a scientific article. When the the reader is inside his web, BANG! comes the open science mantra, that we have to be open, that w...</description>
            <author>Blind.Scientist</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2125284</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:46:07 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2125284</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Is Twitter the essential Blogging nutrient?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2112880&amp;cid=t_173036_88_f&amp;fid=38129&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fsandnsurf.medbrains.net%2F2009%2F01%2Ftwitter-essential-blog-nutrient%2F</link>
            <description>Prompted by a series of conversational musings and twitterings the concept of a &amp;#8216;blogging ecosystem&amp;#8216; became apparent. With the &amp;#8216;blogging host&amp;#8216; as the primary producer and &amp;#8216;blog posts&amp;#8217; as distribution seeds - I went in search of the other energy sources necessary to create a fit, helathy and viable blog.
Additional correlates within the blog life cycle include [...] (Source: Life in the Fast Lane)</description>
            <author>Life in the Fast Lane</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2112880</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:12:36 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2112880</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Conversation takes unexpected and welcome direction</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2086873&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F01%2F08%2Fconversation-takes-unexpected-and-welcome-direction%2F</link>
            <description>This is just brilliant. The PSB 2009 panel session on &amp;#8220;molecular bioinformatics for disease&amp;#8221; has veered in a far more interesting direction. I&amp;#8217;m reading it as the establishment versus the enlightened, but don&amp;#8217;t let me influence you - go and look at the thread yourself.
I so wish I was there.
Posted in bioinformatics, meetings&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Tagged: friendfeed, psb2009&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2086873</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:09:56 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2086873</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Uninspired?  Attend PSB 2009 (virtually)</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2081028&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F01%2F06%2Funinspired-attend-psb-2009-virtually%2F</link>
            <description>Christmas break too short? More tired after the holiday than you were before? Perhaps you&amp;#8217;d like to be on a Pacific atoll; Hawaii, for example.
Cheer up - attend the 2009 Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing via the magic of FriendFeed. They&amp;#8217;ve already had an excellent session on open science (more details here) and the fun continues through to January 9.
Thanks to Shirley, Cameron et al. for the virtual proceedings. Oh, and a belated happy New Year.
Posted in bioinformatics, meetings, open science, web resources&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Tagged: friendfeed, hawaii, psb2009&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2081028</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:46:24 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2081028</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>10 Tips: How to filter discussions on Twitter?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2078783&amp;cid=t_173036_131_f&amp;fid=35008&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fscienceroll.com%2F2009%2F01%2F04%2F10-tips-how-to-filter-discussions-on-twitter%2F</link>
            <description>I follow more than 570 users on Twitter that leads to more than 100 new tweets an hour and I don&amp;#8217;t have hours a day to check all the messages. Co-bloggers frequently ask me how I can follow all of them efficiently. Well, I have a few tips on this and feel free to share yours with us:

Tweetdeck: The best tool to organize your tweets. I created a Health 2.0 group to filter the tweets of the users who are writing about medicine or health 2.0.



Twitter Search:  I always do a search for a few keywords to find new people twitting about my field of interest.



Twilert.com: It works like Google Alerts which means it lets you receive regular e-mail updates of tweets containing your keywords.



Filter by replies: It&amp;#8217;s easy to discover ongoing discussions as people reply to each oth...</description>
            <author>ScienceRoll</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2078783</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:31:00 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2078783</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>This site now listed in Nature Blogs, and the reason behind my keyword choices</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2027020&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35028&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flurena.vox.com%2Flibrary%2Fpost%2Fthis-site-now-listed-in-nature-blogs-and-the-reason-behind-my-keyword-choices.html%3F_c%3Dfeed-rss</link>
            <description>Last week when scanning through Friendfeed, someone mentioned Nature Blogs. A number of my friends and fellow friendfeeders (1,2,3,4,5,6,etc.) already have their blogs registered there. I took the plunge and submitted my request last week, and thi...   
  Read and post comments  |  
  Send to a friend (Source: Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics)</description>
            <author>Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2027020</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:03:23 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2027020</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Citeulike, Friendfeed and me: BFF?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=2011110&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35028&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Flurena.vox.com%2Flibrary%2Fpost%2Fciteulike-friendfeed-and-me-bff.html%3F_c%3Dfeed-rss</link>
            <description>I'll start off by saying that I'm new to the whole Friendfeed thing, and I've also only recently started using Citeulike in a more comprehensive way. I started out on the former through the recommendation of Frank over at peanutbutter, and it's on...   
  Read and post comments  |  
  Send to a friend (Source: Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics)</description>
            <author>Systems Biology &amp; Bioinformatics</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=2011110</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:46:08 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">2011110</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Snippets</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1750047&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F09%2F02%2Fsnippets-4%2F</link>
            <description>Bioinformatics career survey - data released
Read the blog post, join the FriendFeed discussion, edit the wiki page. Don&amp;#8217;t like the analyses? Download the data, do your own.

A new job for everyone&amp;#8217;s favourite French bioinformatician - congratulations Pierre (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1750047</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:47:20 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1750047</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FriendFeed “best of” the week</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1521987&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F06%2F17%2Ffriendfeed-best-of-the-week%2F</link>
            <description>The new best of FriendFeed feature is proving to be a hit. It also provides material for people who are too busy to write real blog posts. Here&amp;#8217;s my top 10, according to FriendFeed, from the past 7 days:

We&amp;#8217;re all looking forward to having an insider at Amazon Web Services
Cameron explains FriendFeed for scientists
A variety of (non-serious) explanations for the falling number of Google searches for bioinformatics-related keywords
Our thoughts on certifying online research
Get to know Prochlorococcus - you&amp;#8217;re probably breathing the by-product of its metabolism right now
Pierre on sorting articles by journal impact factor
Could XMPP be the new MPI?
Welcoming new members to the Life Scientists room
Who&amp;#8217;s off to ISMB 2008?
Paris area employers: call this talented man ...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1521987</comments>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:28:48 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1521987</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Proteomics discussion from the science streamosphere</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1436793&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F05%2F12%2Fproteomics-discussion-from-the-science-streamosphere%2F</link>
            <description>We find ourselves wondering why codon adaptation index (CAI) is used as a measure of protein expression level in this article.
One answer is that CAI does correlate well with protein expression in many proteomics studies; but surely these same studies contain raw data with protein expression level? On reflection, I bet the answer is that it&amp;#8217;s too difficult and laborious to access this type of data. There are plenty of papers that describe large-scale analysis of protein expression using proteomics, but the data are locked up in the articles or as inappropriate supplementary files.
Note to self: look into open-source software and standard data formats for proteomic data. (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1436793</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:27:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1436793</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Now officially living in my browser</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1392480&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F04%2F23%2Fnow-officially-living-in-my-browser%2F</link>
            <description>Firefox screenshot, from left to right:

Vertical tabs, courtesy of Vertigo - because you can never have too many tabs
Main window: the feeds roll into GReader
On the right, almost all the functionality of FriendFeed (except search) in fantastic new extension MySocial 24&amp;#215;7
On the right? Yes, because sidebars look better on the right IMHO, made possible by MultiSidebar

Tenuous bioinformatics connection: well, you work more effectively if you&amp;#8217;re happy with your browser setup (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1392480</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:28:52 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1392480</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Two great open science resources</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1371904&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F04%2F15%2Ftwo-great-open-science-resources%2F</link>
            <description>The Twitter + FriendFeed combination is proving to be a very useful information stream; not just from other people but as a reminder of what I thought was worth sharing. Two links from there that I think deserve wider attention:

One Big Lab proposes that we become, well, one big lab - and has some ideas as to how that might work.
From the OWW wiki, an excellent article on python in computational biology. This has been presented at Pycon 2008 and is also a companion article to a paper in PLoS Computational Biology. Imagine if everyone described their methods in this detail.

Deepak has some commentary on what we&amp;#8217;re now calling the &amp;#8220;bio-twitterverse&amp;#8221;. (Source: What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate)</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1371904</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:56:50 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1371904</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Aggregating the aggregators</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1358513&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F04%2F09%2Faggregating-the-aggregators%2F</link>
            <description>Cameron has a good discussion of lifestream aggregators in a research context.
I have a non-research problem: two apps (FriendFeed and Profilactic), doing essentially the same job, each with features that make both worthwhile. I like Profilactic for these reasons:

Design and appearance (YMMV)
Ability to fetch content from my friends if they use the same services that I do, without having to get them to subscribe to Profilactic (killer feature IMHO - FriendFeed has the &amp;#8220;imaginary friend&amp;#8221; to do a similar job, but way less convenient)
Huge number of services that can be aggregated
Ability to aggregate any feed without giving it a misleading label (FriendFeed will aggregate any feed too, but insists on titling items as &amp;#8220;blog post&amp;#8221;)

On the other hand, FriendFeed has th...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1358513</comments>
            <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 04:40:42 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1358513</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>FriendFeed: What are your friends into?</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1316735&amp;cid=t_173036_93_f&amp;fid=36200&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.jammedph.com%2Ffriendfeed-what-are-your-friends-into%2F</link>
            <description>I was reading a CNET article a while ago and found out about FriendFeed thought to be as the new Twitter.
I will disagree however. Although it has similar feature like Twitter where you are able to know what&amp;#8217;s your friends been up to (in fact, Twitter is one of the shared sites), it has a lot better functionality than the latter.

FriendFeed lets you share your favorite website, whereabouts through Twitter, YouTube video uploads and favorites, del.icio.us bookmarks, Stumble Upon reviews, etc to your friends. So it is basically social media and web 2.0 sites rolled into one. 
Similar sites include Plaxo and Iminta. (Source: Jammed: Full into Capacity)</description>
            <author>Jammed: Full into Capacity</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1316735</comments>
            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:42:28 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1316735</guid>        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lifestreaming</title>
            <link>http://www.medworm.com/index.php?rid=1289733&amp;cid=t_173036_132_f&amp;fid=35006&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fnsaunders.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F03%2F10%2Flifestreaming%2F</link>
            <description>In yet another moment of BBGM synchronicity, I started to think about lifestreaming and its applications as Deepak wrote about it. My inspiration was the recent article 35 ways to stream your life.
I&amp;#8217;ve tried (and you can find me at):

Mugshot - aggregates a limited number of sources, doesn&amp;#8217;t seem to update properly from del.icio.us, has conversation features (quips, comments)
FriendFeed - nice look and feel, a limited number of sources, has conversation features (comments, ratings)
Profilactic - by far my favourite in terms of look/feel and sources (you can add anything that has a feed) but no conversations as yet

Lifestreams are fun. I don&amp;#8217;t expect anyone to care about what I just played on last.fm (and likewise), but these are all ways of broadcasting yourself and mak...</description>
            <author>What You're Doing Is Rather Desperate</author>
            <type>blogs</type>
        <comments>http://www.medworm.com/rss/comments.php?id=1289733</comments>
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:47:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">1289733</guid>        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

